senators know that I have studied a terrible and pernicious
heart of darkness that
has developed in our court system, being the use of
FALSE ACCUSATIONS in civil justice.
the mischief of litigating parties, usually mothers, suddenly
within the context of divorce and within child custody
proceedings falsely accusing the other party, usually fathers,
of the sexual abuse of their own children. ,,,
FALSE ACCUSATIONS are often made with the overt or
covert complicity of their
are a lethal weapon in the business of parental alienation. They
are a tool for achieving sole custody of children and creating
Cause or Consent, no Child shall be
removed from a Natural Parent!!!
"Two Equal Parents may .. agree to unequal
Parenting Time, but this does NOT impugn the Parental Authority
of either Natural Parent relative to Third Party Interlopers.
1. The Bottom Layer: The Initial
Equal Parenting Agreement
Equal Parenting Agreement creating full time, all time
equality of both natural parents, subordinate to no third
parties (a Constitutional right ignored by most Family Courts);
a series of tentative
Parenting Timetables for each year and statement of intent,
or "Wishes"; the requirement that the tentative Parenting
Timetable laid out there will be reviewed and finalized annually
and incorporated into the
Annual Parenting Supplement. Parental authority and
discretion is always equal and unaffected by inequalities of
Parenting Time allocations.
2. Middle Layer: The Annual
Supplement & its Parenting Timetable
3. Top Layer: Autonomy of Both
Equal Parents on all matters not previously Constrained.
Timetable alternates all residual parenting questions
between the two otherwise equal parents who are subordinate to
no third parties. Full autonomy of each parent during
their Parenting Time as allotted in the agreed Parenting
Timetable on all residual parenting questions not previously
constrained by Covenants in the initial Equal Parenting
Agreement, or the current Annual Parenting Supplement.
Full discretion on residual parenting with the Timetabled
Parent, but flexibility encouraged and provided by Ad Hoc
"Conservatives are committed to Shared Parenting. The
national party “Policy Declaration” that was passed by delegates
at our March 2005 Montreal convention
clearly that: Shared Parenting: is an objective of the
Conservative Party of Canada.
Government will make the necessary changes to the Divorce Act to
ensure that in the event of a marital breakdown, the Divorce Act
will allow both parents and all grandparents to maintain a
meaningful relationship with their children and grandchildren,
unless it is clearly demonstrated not to be in the best
interests of the children".
our buddies at the
Human Rights Tribunal and the Courts we have with NO
STATUTORY BASIS established that
HOMOSEXUAL RIGHTS trump
NATURAL PARENTS' RIGHTS.
exercising the Courts in Homosexualist Doctrine, the outcome of
any contest between a homosexual "Legal Parent" wannabe and the
"Natural Parent" has been predetermined, because
we have now established that "NATURAL PARENTS HAVE NO
RIGHTS".Our demands for
Homosexual Marriage is now purging from Canadian Statute the
term "Natural Parent", displacing it with the term "Legal
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"
Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to conform
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal BREACH
the ideas that the State assigns
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from pre-war
Nazi Germany. Under the British system rights are
not State-given, but God Given.
Buying into the Court's position that what rights
remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same position
that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and Canadian Children
are at birth the property of the Courts.
"HELP invents ideological policy-based evidence
to push for increasing institutional child care and decreasing
the time children spend with parents"
Clyde Hertzman wants to know everything he can about about
your family and children. He and his
Human Early Learning Partnerships program has been
successful in subverting our privacy laws to legalize his
collection, analysis, and reporting of your family's
personal information to global policy makers.
Universal Day Care Scam: OECD
Displacement of Natural Parents
The so called "sperm to worm" vision of
Liberal Governments to regulate every activity of Canadians is
pushing to get also into the Universal Daycare business. Pushing
with them are private interests looking for new government
First position that Governments should stay OUT of the Day
Care business and instead restore the Direct Funding to Natural
Parents lost during successive Liberal and Mulroney Governments.
We want to see further Direct Funding for the Nurture of Natural
Parents of Canadian Children instead of creating another
expansion of the typically abusive and treacherous Public
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and they
will likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these
This is completely FALSE. The Judges are
Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT
CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
PARLIAMENT has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was only
observed and documented by individuals sent out by the newly
Norman Crown after the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the laws
and customs of the various peoples of Britain.. This was
done with a view to aggregate existing customs which may vary
across the land, into a unified body of Laws. The
Authority quoted by the Commoners in their administration of
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
The process of documentation took only a
couple of hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body of
Law which was historical, popular, and has served in the
intervening centuries as a Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
is embarking on a cross-Canada cycle to raise awareness
regarding the Father being stripped of the family by the Family
Court System. He is seeking fairness.
want my kids back, at least half the time. I want this law that
removes children from their fathers - and fathers from their
children -to change. I am cycling across Canada to raise
awareness of this problem.
I need other fathers to know they are not alone. I want to unify
the men and children abused by this Family Court System. It is
important that the general public becomes aware of this problem.
Strong has built his career
acting as the Agent of various international money men.
is not the driving force or decision-maker, apparently, and has
since the age of seventeen been transferring ownership of
Canadian Resources out of the country, making himself a Traitor.
He has fled to communist China.
Pierre E Trudeau is listed in the
Guinness Book of Records as being the Prime Minister with
the longest time in office of any Commonwealth PMO, having a
year "reign of terror".. He popularized open
contempt for the Electorate with his
"Fuddle Duddle" responses to questions and his
"Trudeau Salute". Strangely, many Canadians thought
more of him for it. That tells you something about
talking the Provinces into going to the Judiciary for "Binding
Arbitration" on future Constitutional Amendments during the
"Constitution Act, 1982", Trudeau gave the Judiciary it's
first toe into the formerly closed door on
Supremacy and Judicial subordination to Parliament.
then invited Supreme Court Judges to make decisions he couldn't
survive if he took them to the Electorate; and encouraged the
PACs to expand their role in Governmental decision making.
Making Activist Judges
in the SCC the norm, he successfully conned Canadians into
thinking Parliament is bound by SCC's decisions. By
this skillful lawyering. Trudeau successfully
sidestepped both Parliamentary Accountability to the Electorate,
and to their
Protector, the Queen.
Canadians have been so slow in
correcting Trudeau's displacement of Parliament with Judicial
Oligarchy, Judges are now openly and regularly striking
down Parliamentary Statutes, and committing with impunity
High Treason by incorporating Judgments of Foreign Judges
and legislative bodies into Canadian Orders, and writing
Legislative scripts for lackey parliamentarians like
Action Chief Justice
Beverley McLachlin as Judicial Whip for insists Canadian
Judges be far more aggressive in asserting the power of
Trudeaus' Judicial Oligarchy to speedily harmonize Canadian
Statute with the
Global Judiciary's specifications..
Skeletons in the Closet, a film drawn from the dramatized lives of
families living with a protected
Pedophile and the
mental illness it may create when a loving, faithful, Victim keeps the
Secret. This is shockingly
common. The Secret is their Power -
(You would be well advised to stay away from the Public Servant.)
on the Canadian Courts the Supremacy of Parliament, as
expressed in the legislation of the Canadian Parliament.
Judges are not the "New Priests" of Canada, creating
their own "Law" and ruling by "Divine Right".
(Judges are New Priests) ;
2000-xx-xx "The Charter Revolution & The Court Party" They
may not hijack the legislative process in the execution of the
PUBLIC TRUST placed in them to ADMINISTER our LEGISLATION created in
Put into Law and practice the major components of
Recommendations such as the equality of male and female
parents. It seems the Charter, the trump law of Canadian
legislation has been too easily ignored by those entrusted with the
administration of our Canadian legislation.
Purge the law and practice of the "Child
Support Guidelines" of feminarcissism and hyperbolic reasoning. and
make mothers equally burdened by it.
most outrageous example of Judges usurping the role of Parliament is, of
"New Priests" making the false claim that the
Charter's protection against discrimination based on "sex"
means protection against discrimination based on "sexual orientation".
Does the Charter protect sexual
orientations such as polygamists, pedophiles and bestiality?
Of course not!
S.15. (1) Every individual is equal before and
under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal
benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without
discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour,
religion, SEX,age or mental or physical disability.
S.28. Notwithstanding anything in this
Charter, the rights and freedoms referred to in it are guaranteed equally to
MALE and FEMALE persons.
Charter makes absolutely NO REFERENCE to SEXUAL ORIENTATION.
This is simply a wish of the Judiciary they have read into the Charter,
while ignoring the clear wishes of the Electorate. On this
point they have simply been taking care of their own. See:
Egan v. Canada
the Family Law Judges, in BC especially, typically ignore the Statutes
of Parliament in the Divorce Act, which require Judges to remove
custodial rights of a Parent who will not use those rights to maintain
the relationship with the other parent, usually the mother, and assign
those rights to the other parent, usually the father.
The Charter's usage of the word "sex" is as the
common usage of "gender". The Charter's clear intent is that there
to be no discrimination between male and female, even in such questions
as Parenting. The Courts are driven inexorably towards Equal
Parenting by the Charter, the "Supreme Law of Canada". And yet
they do not comply with our instructions to them in the Statutes of a
duly elected Parliament.
From: maurice.vellacott.a1 <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Wed, May 7, 2014 4:14 pm
Subject: Update on anticipated C-560 debate
Well, we were expecting one hour of debate
Bill C-560 today but the votes scheduled
for today take precedence over PMB hour, and
there were a much larger than normal # of
votes this evening on various other bills.
I learned yesterday that when these votes
continue beyond 7pm, the Speaker cancels
Private Member's Debate for the day, and
it is rescheduled. It will be rescheduled
for another day within the next 10 sitting
days of the
House of Commons. Since there is a break
week from the 18th to the 24th, this means
that it will be rescheduled for a day
between now and May 28th.
will keep you updated. But despite the
this gives people more time to contact their
MPs and to send in petitions, etc.
A new group is emerging that may finally change the way Family Courts
treat mothers and fathers. Currently, the default in most states is to award the
lion's share of the time with the children to mothers, and require the father to
pay child support. This is unfair to fathers, and has resulted in massive abuses
within the system, leading to fathers committing suicide and being imprisoned. A
new organization I am a part of,
Leading Women for Shared Parenting, seeks to
remedy this inequality by having women and mothers speak up in favor of shared
parenting. When legislators realize that women themselves are in favor of
reversing this bias, they should finally change the laws to make the default a
presumption of 50/50 equally shared custody.
Fathers' rights organizations have tried for years to change the status quo, but
have not quite pulled it off, no doubt due to the growing stigma against men in
society. They have been marginalized by being called sore losers and deadbeats
who only want to lower their child support.
Continually, between 78 and 87 percent of both men and women support shared
parenting – and there is no statistical difference between the sexes.Dr.
William Fabricius, an Associate Professor of Psychology of at Arizona State
University, discovered these results when polling residents in Pima County,
Arizona. He also found that polls taken in Canada and a vote in Massachusetts
revealed very similar results. But sadly, Fabricius writes, “there is a very
sizable gap between current popular views strongly favoring equal custody, as
reflected in polls and votes on custody allocation, and actual legal outcomes.”
The reason we don't have shared parenting is because it's a big business.
law attorneys make too much money off the years of legal fighting, and the state
bar associations help their own keep their greedy claws controlling the system
by lobbying state legislatures to oppose shared parenting bills.
There is significant research showing that shared parenting is best for kids.
There are over three dozen medical studies which indicate that shared parenting
arrangements – joint decision-making and near-equal parenting time – provide the
best outcomes for children. The studies also reveal that parenting time of every
other weekend, commonly ordered by judges, is harmful to children.
The stereotype that women are more nurturing than men has been challenged by a
study published a couple of years ago in the
Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences. The study found that fatherhood awakens men's nurturing side.
Testosterone levels in men fall 30 percent after they become fathers, and even
more when the children are infants and when the fathers are significantly
involved with child-rearing.
According to a report released this month from
Pew Research Analysis, women
aren't staying at home anymore, dependent upon men earning an income to support
them. Mothers are the sole or primary source of income for a record 40 percent
of households with children. This is almost a 400 percent increase from 1960,
when just 11 percent of mothers were the breadwinners.
What sister, mother, grandmother, or daughter hasn't had a brother, father or
son suffer within the unjust family law system? Many women end up helping their
male relative pay his child support and legal fees. I have no children of my
own, but have spent money and countless hours helping male relatives with legal
proceedings related to child custody and child support.
No doubt as a result of this broad unfairness, the women who are a part of this
new organization surprisingly range from conservative
Phyllis Schlafly to a
former president of the feminist National Organization of Women. With agreement
all across the political spectrum, there is a tremendous chance that state
legislators will be able to fight off the slick lobbyists from
and pass shared custody legislation.
Legislators must also fight against pressure to substitute watered-down bills
that do not provide for approximately 50/50 shared custody. “Joint custody” is
often little more than a semantic difference from “sole custody.” Joint custody
generally gives one parent much more time and control, as well as child support
from the other parent. Unless one parent has committed abuse, serious crimes, or
similar circumstances, the default should be a presumption of equally shared
Children – including daughters – who were withheld from their fathers while
growing up, who saw their fathers living out of their cars and crippled
financially, have now become adults and are saying enough. It is way overdue to
stop appeasing Big Law at the expense of families. Now, a group of Leading Women
is speaking out.
Its recommendations, which will be officially
released later this month, reportedly include strategies for
streamlining the legal process, encouraging mediation and
The report will note that
number of self-representing litigants in family-law cases has
climbed to above 70%, largely due to the exorbitant cost of
lawyers. That statistic suggests the economic hardship
breakups impose, but not the heartbreaking human costs imposed
on parents — especially fathers, who often find the deck stacked
against them in court.
Efficiency, reduced costs and diminished litigation are worthy
goals in a system notorious for being out of control in all
these areas. But a
more fundamental reform also is needed: The establishment of
equal shared parenting as the default in custody after
In most contested
cases, mothers are awarded sole — or effectively sole — custody
over children, with fathers relegated to the role of visitors,
an unsatisfactory situation for them and for their children.
Even unlitigated cases are settled “in the shadow of the law” —
meaning that fathers often are advised by their lawyers to
settle for whatever they can get, as they know the deck would be
stacked against them in court.
— a minimum of 40% of time spent with children by each parent —
has been federal Conservative party policy in theory since 2002,
following an exhaustively researched landmark federal study in
1998, “For the Sake of the Children,” which recommended equal
parenting as the presumptive custodial arrangement in the
absence of abuse.
in spite of its own avowed, reiterated position — and polls
showing 80% of Canadians support a strong role for both divorced
parents in the lives of their children — Stephen Harper’s
government has failed to enable
MP Maurice Vellacott’s repeated motions to that end. As a
result, fathers often continue to be unjustly marginalized in
We know much more about the effects of enforced separation from
fathers on children than we did even a decade ago.
anti-father myths persist, such as: that infants and toddlers
have only one primary “attachment figure”; that overnighting
away from mothers causes anxiety or maladjustment in all infants
and toddlers; that children prefer living with only one parent,
and shared parenting isn’t worth the hassle; that shared
parenting works only in the case of harmonious divorces; and
that the quality of children’s relationships with their fathers
is not related to how much time they spend together.
fact-based drama explores the..
World War II Danish Resistance fighters
Flame and Citron, who, after taking orders from a Resistance
leader, systematically assassinated Danish collaborators and
Flame and Citron on NETFILX
LGBT Activist Masha Gessen: Gay Marriage is about the
destruction of Marriage
"It's a no-brainer that the institution of Marriage should not
exist. ... That causes my
brain some trouble.... Why it causes me trouble is because
fighting for gay marriage generally involves lying about what
we're going to do with marriage when we get there. ..
that the institution of marriage is not going to change... and
that is a Lie.
institution of Marriage is going to change, and it should
change.. Again, I don't think it should exist.
BTW It is
important that Equal
Parenting legislation be SILENT on a
to give clear unambiguous direction to the Courts.
External, existing legislation
and CPS & MCF
"Ministries" are already more than adequate to intervene in
Child Abuse or Child Abandonment... and been so over used
they have in fact become instruments of
All the more reason that BOTH NATURAL PARENTS be fully engaged in their
children's lives after Divorce.
Brian Gerrish discusses Common
Purpose its connections with freemasonry and the
implications in family courts controlled by
Thousands of families everyday are being
stripped bare and children removed to care homes by a
small cabal of self appointed judicial monsters
Natural Parents, subordinate to no third parties (a
Constitutional right ignored by most Family Courts); a series of
Parenting Timetables for each year and statement of intent, or
"Wishes"; the requirement that the tentative Parenting Timetable laid
out there will be reviewed and finalized annually and incorporated into
Annual Parenting Supplement. Parental authority and discretion
is always equal and unaffected by inequalities of Parenting Time
In an Equal Parenting Agreement, Parenting Time is NOT an indicator of
Parents may by consent agree to unequal Parenting Time, but this does
NOT impugn the Parental Authority of either Natural Parent
relative to third parties without Cause or Consent.
Annual Supplement is made about the same time each
year and deals only with parenting decisions for the upcoming year which were
deferred in the Initial Agreement, and made only In Principle.
will be made annually until the Agreement's
term is completed at the Age of Majority of the youngest Child.
Failure to create an Annual Supplement means the requirements of the
Initial Agreement made In Principle will be by silence be
Top Layer: Autonomy of Both Equal Parents on all matters not
Parents retain full Parental Authority relative to all third parties,
and are subject to no third
party Interloper or to a Public Officer without statutory Cause or
Consent. This way the Natural Parent who is not the
Timetabled Parent (and is now a subordinate Co-Parent) remains at all
times empowered to protect the Child from the
State and all other
Icing on the Cake.....
Forget about the Courts,
and your Ex, and go have fun with your kids!!!
"First Week In" Charles Bruce Vs Judicial Racketeers
Sent to Debtors Prison for Non-Payment of
YouTube removed at the
demand of a Colorado law firm claiming to represent
Mr. Bruces's ex,
Discovery Channel is "defaming" his Client and "exploiting
by showing blurred images of them with their
Charles Bruce. The firm says Mr. Bruce
is being incarcerated because he
is in "contempt of Court" by being unable to
pay their extortionate demands.
Discovery's YouTube many times we are unable to find a
blunder in Discovery's editing which would reveal the identities
of the mother or children and validate
they are receiving Threats as
as a result of Discovery's programming.
FALSE ACCUSATIONS are often made with the overt or
covert complicity of their
lawyers. They are a lethal weapon in
the business of parental alienation. They are a tool for
achieving sole custody of children and creating fatherlessness."
Money Masters - How International Bankers Gained Control of America
does Money Come From ... The new Amero Note that the gold
bullion which was once in Fort Knox appears to have been spirited
elsewhere - presumably to the Lenders' coffers - so the return to the
Gold Standard may NOT be the solution to these ills, and may actually
COMPOUND the problem of indebtedness.
"Billionaire George Soros will soon make his
first major contributions in the 2012 election
cycle with donations of $1 million each to two
independent groups backing President Obama's
re-election bid: .. The
New York Times reports that, in all, Soros
and his fellow deep-pocketed liberal donors are
preparing to inject as much as $100 million into
independent groups looking to help Democrats
lots more of this with the
40% increase in number of American Dollars created
(Quantitative Easing). This steals 29%
of the existing buying power from existing dollar
holders and gives that buying power to to the
central banks to whom it is given (JP
Morgan / Chase "JPM" et al.).
BIS, the "Nazi Bank" is positioned as the
"Central Bank of Central Banks".
currency holders will see NYSE products at "fire sale" prices being
priced in newly devalued American dollars. American currency
holders will be likely be deceived,
$AM are "recovering". Currently being discussed is the
"urgent" need to raise the American Debt Ceiling to permit the Fed
to print more $AM.
Rhodes, former Friend of the Court Investigator ... recently did
an interview with host Richard Farr on the
KRights.com Internet Radio station. Michigan Shared parenting
Robert Pedersen of
A Child’s Right was also interviewed. To listen, click
you never sign a
Master Joyce Guardianship Model (or any
Parenting Agreement), your kids'
Custodial Parent, Step-Parent, Teacher,
Social Worker, or
can never point to your Signature and tell
them that you didn't want them or that you
gave them up BY CONSENT.
MAKE THE JUDGE SIGN the disgusting Sole
Custody Order and reap the consequences
Meanwhile, we hope
estranged Dads can look forward to a Happy
Reunion with your children in not too many
15-20 years to eradicate morals in youth and train them in
Marxist thinking. Positions of power in government,
civil service, business, educational system... occupied by
Leftists, Dissidents and half-baked intellectuals.
Essentially complete now in US <& Canada!!>.
Irreversible within a generation.
Destabilization of economy, foreign relations &
defense systems: 2 - 5 years.
Crisis: perhaps only 6 weeks
Normalization: Shooting the Dissidents & Useful
Idiots, taking power.
"SEATTLE - A man shot and killed by officers after he brandished
an inert <child's plastic> grenade at
Seattle's new Federal Courthouse Monday was described as
angry about child support rulings, police said. ... Court records
wages had been garnished in a child support case. ... He
twice by two veteran Seattle Police Department officers. ..."
"Canada’s Guidelines .. ignore the child-support recipient’s income, ..
child-support payor’s directly-paid child-related expenses .. do not
permit Canada’s Guidelines to ignore either parent’s income or to ignore
either parent’s child-related expenses."
"Canadians pay $200
million monthly in child support according to Canada’s Child-Support
Guidelines of which $100 million is above what may reasonably be
considered to be a fair amount. The unfair content of child support paid
according to Canada’s Guidelines will reach $20 billion by the end of
It is clear to any disinterested observer
hat almost the only opponents to
are misandric ideologues ..
financially invested in the Family
Court system ..
a drastic reduction in revenue.
FMEP Members are lawyers.
Their job is to enforce Orders, so also participate in sale of
properties, bankruptcies & foreclosures,"
"the Homosexual fraction of the Law
Societies & Judiciaries is "forty-something" percent"
FALSE ACCUSATIONS are often made with the overt or
covert complicity of their
lawyers. They are a lethal weapon in
the business of parental alienation. They are a tool for
achieving sole custody of children and creating fatherlessness."
Senator Nancy Schaefer and her husband Bruce have died from
a single shot wound each.
was shot once in the back while she lay sleeping. Her husband
Bruce was shot once in the chest.
Both shots were
Two shots, Two Kills
The deaths are being handled as
a 'murder-suicide'. More likely Bruce was shot
in the chest while confronting the Shooter having been woken by
the the shot that killed Nancy.
Lawyers consistently estimate the
homosexual fraction of
the Law Societies & Judiciaries as "forty-something" percent.
a randomly selected Judge or Lawyer is about thirty
TIMES more likely to be homosexual than the population at large
"Last Friday my bank account was garnished. I was
left with a total of $00.43 in the bank. ..
Since my last pay was direct deposited on Friday I now have no
way of supporting myself. I have no money for food or for gas
for my car to enable me to work. ..
I would have preferred to die with more dignity."
Although born a Catholic to his rabid mother
Elizabeth I's nephew James could not have been seen as a Catholic
when his Assassination was ordered.
"Authorized Version" of the Bible
would be printed
in the English language.
In 1605, the
assassination was attempted, by the infamous
"King James Bible" was printed in spite of Roman plots to
destroy James, Britain's Protestant Parliament, and the what was
derisively called the
Born an English Catholic, Fawkes left Britain to fight as a
Mercenary for the Spanish. He later returned secretly to
England from France to Assassinate the newly Protestant
James I in what
has been called the "Gunpowder Plot".
It is inconceivable that the
Cardinal Richelieu were not
fully knowledgeable and participant in the Operation..
when a BC Teacher is impregnated by a FOURTEEN year
old boy, BC Courts have ordered HIS PARENTS to pay the Teacher
insists the parents are not permitted to know their Child is
sexually active, or who in the school is coaching their Child.
Federation will be dropping the prohibitions on Teachers having
sex with Students. They are too costly to retain when BC
Courts routinely dismiss charges against the Pedophile Teachers we
the man died Saturday in a crash near the Dundurn military base
south of Saskatoon. He was driving a car that was hit head-on by
a truck pulling a trailer on the wrong side of the highway."
<Rick's death seems all too convenient!!!!!>
"Shame on them,"
said in an interview, after learning
the couple who left a Saskatoon
hospital with his newborn son this
spring while he desperately
sought help asserting his
Paternity & Right to custody
<The Adoptive Parents> now want
access to his financial records in
order to calculate how much he
should pay them for the child's
"Lohstroh, a 41-year-old emergency-room doctor, was shot in
the back Friday when he went to pick up his two sons at their mother's
home. Police say the 10-year-old boy climbed into the back of his
father's sport utility vehicle, fired a pistol several times through the
back of the driver's seat and then ran back inside the home."
FYI the rate of violence and murder in
lesbian relationships is bizarrely high when compared to
heterosexual couples. Sexual mutilation of the corpse is
very common, but rarely reported in the papers for fear of "offending the
Judges and lawyers often refer to what is called
which simply is the past decisions of judges made in other cases. In reality,
there is no such thing as "Case Law" because
Judges don't have the necessary Jurisdiction to make Law.
Parliament has that
Jurisdiction.. The Courts are Agents of the Crown, and
what Jurisdiction they have has been delegated to them
BY STATUTE of Parliament.
Their role is the ADMINISTRATION
of Law created by our elected Parliament, not it's creation.
your lawyer, whose career depends upon his submission to the
Judges, may tell you as we have been told repeatedly, that
doesn't matter what the Statue says..... all that matters
is what the Judge says. Common Law is whatever the
Judges are commonly saying these days.
This is a Bluff of the Activist
Judges, which you must Call.