"Honourable senators know that I have studied a terrible and
pernicious heart of darkness that has developed in our court
system, being the use of FALSE ACCUSATIONS
in civil justice. This is the mischief of litigating parties,
usually mothers, suddenly within the context of divorce and
within child custody proceedings falsely accusing the other
party, usually fathers, of the sexual abuse of their own
children. ,,, These FALSE ALLEGATIONS
are often made with the overt or covert complicity of their
lawyers. They are a lethal weapon in the business of parental
alienation. They are a tool for achieving sole custody of
children and creating fatherlessness."
EPA
Meetings
are now managed using the Meetup meeting and messaging tools.
Leave a Note at: Equal
Parenting-BC if you wish, with your phone number or Skype ID
and we will try to call you to get you into a Group near you.
Spouses welcome at "Open Meetings", but NCPs only at
"Closed Meetings", please.
With
our buddies at the
Human Rights Tribunal and the Courts we have with NO
STATUTORY BASIS established that
HOMOSEXUAL RIGHTS trump
NATURAL PARENTS' RIGHTS.
By
exercising the Courts in Homosexualist Doctrine, the outcome of
any contest between a homosexual "Legal Parent" wannabe and the
"Natural Parent" has been predetermined, because
we have now established that "NATURAL PARENTS HAVE NO
RIGHTS".Our demands for
Homosexual Marriage is now purging from Canadian Statute the
term "Natural Parent", displacing it with the term "Legal
Parent".
"Natural
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
"Natural
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"
16.10
Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to conform
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal BREACH
OF TRUST"
FYI,
the ideas that the State assigngs
Rights &
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from pre-war
Nazi Germany. Under the British system rights are
not State-given, but God Given.
Buying into the Court's position that what rights
remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same position
that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and Canadian Children
are at birth the property of the Courts.
In
"Women and the Process of Constitutional Reform" McLellan
warns that <Horrors!>
"Provincial
Legislatures may impose a presumption of Joint Custody... and
perpetuate the domination of men over women"
Clyde Hertzman wants to know everything he can about about
your family and children. He and his
Human Early Learning Partnerships program has been
successful in subverting our privacy laws to legalize his
collection, analysis, and reporting of your family's
personal information to global policy makers.
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and they
will likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these
days".
This is completely FALSE. The Judges are
Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT
CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
1649, only
PARLIAMENT has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was only
observed and documented by individuals sent out by the newly
Norman Crown after the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the laws
and customs of the various peoples of Britain.. This was
done with a view to aggregate existing customs which may vary
across the land, into a unified body of Laws. The
Authority quoted by the Commoners in their administration of
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
Bible and
principles of
Danelaw
The process of documentation took only a
couple of hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body of
Law which was historical, popular, and has served in the
intervening centuries as a Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
Arnie Hein is embarking on a cross-Canada cycle to raise
awareness regarding the Father being stripped of
the family by the Family Court System. He is seeking fairness.
" I
want my kids back, at least half the time. I want this law that
removes children from their fathers - and fathers from their
children -to change. I am cycling across Canada to raise
awareness of this problem.
I need other fathers to know they are not alone. I want to unify
the men and children abused by this Family Court System. It is
important that the general public becomes aware of this problem.
"
or
us, of course, it is not Parliament that needs to be "Blown Up"
but the
Star Chamber and the back-door Courtrooms
of
these unelected, Evil and treacherous
Activist Judges.
Mid-Week
Closed Meetings: Intermediate Towns or Towns not on
Arnie's Route might want to have a Mid-Week Closed Meeting, say
on the Wednesday Evening.
Friday,
Arrivals Day: Arrivals in the late afternoon.
Dinner, Billets set up. Closed Meetings during Friday
Evening and Saturday Morning.
Saturday: Meetings Day: Open
Speaker Meetings Saturday Morning thru Saturday Evening.
Please have your best SPEAKERS at OPEN MEETINGS recorded if you
can for uploading to YouTube for viewing in subsequent Roundups
during the EP Progressive Convention.
Sunday,
March & Farewells Day:
Gather at your muster station at 9 AM
and find your group's March Marshalls. The
EP
Trekkers, be they Cyclists, Classic Cars, or Motorbikes,
will probably depart first, and start circling the
buildings at the Rally Point until your arrival. The March
Marshalls will organize each groups departure. which will
be followed by literature distribution & "flag waving" as
you
MARCH to the steps of the
the Rally Point buildings , which will probably be a local
University, College, Library or Government Buildings.
Ideally, your Rally Point will be your local Courthouse or
Legislative Buildings, as you message to others is to
"Take Back the Courts".
Remember, a March is NOT a
Parade, but an assertion of Ownership. To remain
unfettered by licensing requirements, it may be advantageous for
the Trekkers to remain as simple Vehicles on the roadways, and
the Marchers to remain as simple Pedestrians off the roads, each
obeying all pertinent local laws.
The MARCH incorporates
ongoing leaflet distribution and Calls for new Marchers to tag
along, as you approach the Rally site at Noon, hopefully with
lots of Drums & Pipes. Have your Speakers over the Lunch
Hour, followed by the
"Fare
Well" and Trekker's Departure onto the Next Leg of the
Equal Parenting Trek Please let everything be done
in an orderly and courteous fashion, mindful of the needs of
your fellow Citizens.
Simply exercise without hooliganism your rights of Freedom
of Speech and Freedom of Assembly, and to Petition the
Legislature. These hard-won Freedoms must be exercised.
Those of you who wish to maintain Anonymity way wish to done the
Garb of Vendetta.
Perhaps on Sunday Evening you might even be able to enjoy a
Fireworks display in fond anticipation of the next Meetup in you
town on November 5th at the same March destination.
"Pass
on. This was a man who was illegally arrested and sent to jail on
a bench warrant and the judge refused to let him speak in his own
defense, yelled at him and ordered the sheriffs to take him away.
He had
Lou Gehrig's Disease. This absolutely disgusts me. The
guy could not work but the judge felt he could work and pay child
support. Judge Kieser is disgraceful. Also, Wilbur's ex-wife
and her attorney are disgraceful. They have no moral compass.
... "
"Description:
Since the introduction of the so called “No
Fault Divorce” in Canada, the divorce industry has
evidenced unprecedented growth estimated at $6 billion
per year. The problem is that the Legal / Court industry
thrives off the $B’s generated by Tax payers and
Families in crises. For this they provide no value and
in fact cause
destruction of families by unnecessarily
removing fathers from children’s lives
and lowering the
standard of living for all family members. This is done through
unnecessary litigation, biased decisions and
unreasonable support orders which escalate conflict to
perpetuate the status quo in support of their self
serving business. The Solution is to update divorce laws
to reflect parental equality and get families out of
court eliminating significant grief and $'s wasted by
families and taxpayers. An alternative to courts is
identified in the book."
Robert Pedersen was devastated three years ago when a
divorce judge said he could see his two children only a few days
a month. ...Michigan law recommends that custody decisions
be based on which parent has been the primary caregiver unless
it can be
shown that another arrangement is
more
appropriate, but Pedersen and other noncustodial parents are
fighting to modify the law so joint physical custody becomes the
norm. They view equal parenting access as a civil rights issue,
but opponents <all with a vested interest
in Sole
Custody
outcomes> say equal time isn't always best for children.
... "With the pain of a divorce, a lot of stupid
decisions are made initially as far as the kids go,"
said
Pedersen, who plans to ride his bike from Lansing to Washington, D.C.,
this summer to raise awareness of the issue. "There are
different
contributions that Mom and
Dad make to a child, and
kids need both of them." ... You can
reach Kim Kozlowski at (313) 222-2024 or
kkozlowski@detnews.com;
http://www.erideshare.com
"Pass
on. This was a man who was illegally arrested and sent to jail on
a bench warrant and the judge refused to let him speak in his own
defense, yelled at him and ordered the sheriffs to take him away.
He had
Lou Gehrig's Disease. This absolutely disgusts me. The
guy could not work but the judge felt he could work and pay child
support. Judge Kieser is disgraceful. Also, Wilbur's ex-wife
and her attorney are disgraceful. They have no moral compass.
... "
"Description:
Since the introduction of the so called “No
Fault Divorce” in Canada, the divorce industry has
evidenced unprecedented growth estimated at $6 billion
per year. The problem is that the Legal / Court industry
thrives off the $B’s generated by Tax payers and
Families in crises. For this they provide no value and
in fact cause destruction of families by unnecessarily
removing fathers from children’s lives and lowering the
standard of living for all family members. This is done through
unnecessary litigation, biased decisions and
unreasonable support orders which escalate conflict to
perpetuate the status quo in support of their self
serving business. The Solution is to update divorce laws
to reflect parental equality and get families out of
court eliminating significant grief and $'s wasted by
families and taxpayers. An alternative to courts is
identified in the book."
CANGRANDS is an national
internet support group
for kinship families
raising ‘other people’s
children’. According to
Stats Canada, 70,000
grandparents are raising
grandchildren, with no
bio parent in the home,
and with next to nil for
government support.
There are 20,000 kinship
children in Ontario. In
the Ottawa area there
are over 3000 kinship
families! ..
"Kinship care" is
defined as the placement
of a child in the home
of the child's relative
.. 58% of Kinship
families consist of a
single grandmother,
raising one or two
special needs
grandchildren.
2005-06-21 Memory, Pain and the Truth: A
leading psychologist long skeptical about 'repressed' recollections
challenged a much-cited sex abuse claim. Scorn and litigation
ensued.
This article
demonstrates a "Jane Doe" who in adulthood had forgotten her
mothers' sexually abusing her until she was shown a tape of
herself as a child reporting her mother's molesting her.
NOTE: Sexually abused children often discard (forget)
unacknowledged painful events to maintain sanity
and emotionally
survive while living with their Abuser. In adulthood,
memories may erupt spontaneously decades later, triggered by
some seemingly trivial event evoking the discarded memory. These
are the true "recovered memories". An extraordinary
injustice was done when Psychologist "professionals" began
searching for these memories in their clients using hypnotism,
promptings and suggestion, seeking for a "memory" to "recover".
This led to a plethora of false accusations against men, and
gave rise to discounting all "Recovered Memories" as "Recovered
Memory Syndrome".
Psychologist Elizabeth F. Loftus
sought to expose the feminazi witch hunt against falsely
accused men, but appears to have inadvertently strengthened the
legal defense of true Pedophiles and prompting true
victims to continue their suffering in silence once again.
See also:
breakingthesilence.com; and
June 13, 2005 / Matthew MacDonald,
hiddenfromhistory.org.
"The
nuclear family must be destroyed ... Whatever its
ultimate meaning, the break-up of families now is an
objectively revolutionary process" -
Linda Gordon
"We
can't destroy the inequities between men and women until
we destroy marriage" -
Robin Morgan, Ms. Magazine;
"I feel that
'man-hating' is an honourable and viable political act,
that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against
the class that is oppressing them." -
Robin Morgan, Ms. Magazine Editor
"I
want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a
high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the
mouth of a pig" -
Andrea Dworkin "Marriage as an institution developed
from rape as a practice" -
Andrea Dworkin "Heterosexual intercourse is the
pure, formalized expression of contempt for women's
bodies" -
Andrea Dworkin
"The
institution of sexual intercourse is anti-feminist" -
Ti-Grace Atkinson;
"Feminism is the theory,
lesbianism is the practice"-
Ti-Grace Atkinson
Violence and Homosexuality;
"The top six U.S. male serial killers were all
gay < as are
40-something % of Canadian Law Faculties, Law Societies, and the
Judiciary, "common knowledge" among lawyers>:
Juan Corona was
convicted of murdering 25 migrant workers (he "made love"
with their corpses).
"Lesbian
Aileen Wuornos laid claim in 1992 to "worst female killer" with
at least 7 middle-aged male victims. She singlehandedly topped
the lesbian nurse team of Catherine Wood and Gwen Graham, who
had killed 6 convalescent patients in Grand Rapids, Michigan.
The association between serial murder and homosexuality isn’t
recent..... "
"Opponents of same
sex-marriage claimed a major victory yesterday after a
respected constitutional expert issued the legal opinion
that Parliament could define marriage as a union between
a man and a woman without contravening the Supreme
Court's comments on the issue. According to Eugene
Meehan, a former national president of the Canadian Bar
Association and former executive legal officer of the
Supreme Court, Canada's highest court has not required
Parliament to amend the Traditional definition, nor has
gay marriage received protection under the Charter of
Rights and Freedoms."
Comment:
Go to
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Why
the discrepancy between the SCC Judges' claims,
emphasized vociferously by the Liberals in the last
election, and the Statute? We suggest the problem
is the prevalence of Career Activists -
"New Priests" they call themselves -
purposefully positioning themselves in our Judiciaries
to subvert the powers of the Canadian Electorate and
their elected members of Parliament. In truth the
Charter in TWO places (Section 15.1
Equality Rights and again in Section 28:
General.), the Courts are by Statute of Parliament
and the Legislatures, instructed they MAY NOT
DISCRIMINATE BASED ON GENDER - an every day occurrence
in Family Courts. If Overturnings of Provincial
Court rulings by the Supreme Court of Canada are a
measure of legitimacy or competence, the BC Courts have
the worst record of any Province in the country.
Based on five-year averages, BC, with roughly 14% of the
national population, represents about 35% of the
Canadian Supreme Court Overturnings of Provincial Court
rulings.
Stay up to date on
Bill C-38:
Click here for Bill C-38's current status
A special committee has been formed to conduct an
in-depth study on Bill C-38. Contact information for the
members of this committee can be found [here]
Skeletons in the Closet, a film drawn from the dramatized
lives of families living with a protected
Pedophile and the
mental illness it may create when a loving, faithful, Victim
keeps the Secret. This is shockingly
common. The Secret is their Power -
BREAK IT!
(You would be well advised to stay away from the Public
Servant.)
This TV docudrama highlights the inadequacies
of Inheritance Statutes to protect Grandparents and Natural
Children from theft by a Newcomer Spouse. The only remedy
for Natural Children against the "Black Widow" and "Grey Widow"
strategies is more Court Time, and that with only an abysmal
prognosis in outcome. Again, Judges do not consider
themselves bound by Statute, and the Statutes that exist were
typically written when a Surviving Spouse and a Natural Parent
were one and the same person, hardly the case today.
The current probability of divorce at five years duration is 65%
in new first marriages, and increases with duration.
Second and third marriages are even worse. Instead
of deterring the Newcomer Spouse from making spurious claims
upon Family Assets at Death and Divorce, BC Judges are now
waiving completely the time constraints for a "Long Marriage",
the duration of marriage necessary before Assets are divided
50/50. The explanation offered is that that the present
rapidity of Divorce following Marriage justifies giving a
Newcomer Spouse upon marriage an INSTANT 50% interest in the
Family Assets accrued by the Natural Parents and Grandparents.
Like the writers of
"WIDOW ON THE HILL" we consider this a profound insult
to the Grandparents and the Deceased Natural Parent whose work
and savings created the Family Assets for the Benefit of their
progeny (family). This is a strong deterrent against
saving for the financial security for your family and your
children's future and harmful to families. We believe the
Newcomer's absconding with the Family Assets with the
complacency of the Courts is tantamount to Grave-Robbing.
Less recognized is that the Natural Children
of the deceased Natural Parents, cannot contest the Claim of the
Newcomer Spouse on Family Assets unless they remain a part of
the Estate, and assets are no longer a part of the Estate once
once they have been "commingled" with the Newcomer Spouse in
marriage. On Marriage, the first half-interest transfers
immediately to the Newcomer Spouse. The remaining
half-interest transfers immediately to the Newcomer Spouse
upon the death of the remaining Natural Parent!
Consequently, ALL FAMILY ASSETS, more than likely, will be
handed over the Newcomer Spouse, disinheriting utterly the
Natural Children. We, like author
Stephen Harrigan,
find this deplorable.
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.