The Canadian Parliament MUST:

1. Impress on the Canadian Courts  the Supremacy of Parliament, as  expressed in the legislation of the  Canadian Parliament.  Judges  are not  the "New Priests" of Canada, creating their own "Law" and ruling by "Divine Right". (Judges are New Priests) ; 2000-xx-xx  "The Charter Revolution & The Court Party" They may not hijack the legislative process in the execution of the PUBLIC TRUST placed in them to ADMINISTER our LEGISLATION created in Parliament.

2. Put into Law and practice the major components of  48 Recommendations  such as the equality of male and female parents.  It seems the Charter, the trump law of Canadian legislation has been too easily ignored by those entrusted with the administration of our Canadian legislation.

3. Purge the law and practice of  the "Child Support Guidelines" of feminarcissism and hyperbolic reasoning. and make mothers equally burdened by it.

The most outrageous example of Judges usurping the role of Parliament is, of course  these "New Priests"  making the false claim  that the Charter's  protection against discrimination based on "sex" means protection against discrimination based on "sexual orientation".  Does the Charter  protect sexual orientations such as  polygamists, pedophiles and bestiality?  Of course not! 

What the Charter DOES say is:

S.15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, SEX, age or mental or physical disability.

S.28. Notwithstanding anything in this Charter, the rights and freedoms referred to in it are guaranteed equally to MALE and FEMALE persons.

The Charter makes absolutely NO REFERENCE to SEXUAL ORIENTATION.  This is simply a wish of the Judiciary they have read into the Charter, while  ignoring the clear wishes of the Electorate.  On this point they have simply been taking care of their own.  See: Egan v. Canada

Similarly the Family Law Judges, in BC especially, typically ignore the Statutes of Parliament in the Divorce Act, which require Judges to remove custodial rights of a Parent who will not use those rights to maintain the relationship with the other parent, usually the mother, and assign those rights to the other parent, usually the father.

The Charter's usage of the word "sex" is as the common usage of "gender".  The Charter's clear intent is that there to be no discrimination between male and female, even in such questions as Parenting.   The Courts are driven inexorably towards Equal Parenting by the Charter, the "Supreme Law of Canada".  And yet they do not comply with our instructions to them in the Statutes of a duly elected Parliament.   

More... Issues:  Parliament Must;     "Friendly Parent Rule" 16.10 , AKA "Maximum Contact" ignored, almost eliminated by Liberal Party of Canada;      Custody Orders not Enforced when Moms are in Breach;      Parental Alienation & "PAS";      Fabian Socialism, AKA Stealth Communism

This interview outlines his discovery that some of the largest Tax Exempt Foundations are Fabian Socialists having among their objectives the re-education of the US, conditioning it to be  "comfortably merged with the Soviet Union".

More:  Issues:  Quigley,  Carroll...  "Tragedy & Hope";
Issues:  Dodd, Norman:  Congressional Investigator & former Banker;
Issues:  Griffin, G. Edward:  Creature From Jekyll Island A Second Look at the Federal Reserve;
Issues:  Russo, Aaron:  "America, Freedom to Fascism"