Senator Anne Cools, FTSOTC Chair on False Accusations
&
Law Societies' permitting Lawyers to Lie in Court

Senator Anne Cools, FTSOTC Chair, formerly
Liberal, now Conservative
Anne Cools - Google Search
Anne Cools - Google Video

Anne Cools' Website
Anne Cools
on False Accusations
EP Nemesis, Liberal Hedy Fry, the Queen of FALSE ACCUSERS
"Honourable senators know that I have studied a terrible and pernicious
heart of darkness that has developed in our court system, being the use
of
FALSE ACCUSATIONS in civil justice.
This is
the mischief of litigating parties, usually mothers, suddenly within the
context of divorce and within child custody proceedings falsely accusing
the other party, usually fathers, of the sexual abuse of their own
children. ,,,
These
FALSE ALLEGATIONS are often made with the overt or covert complicity
of their lawyers. They are a lethal weapon in the business of parental
alienation. They are a tool for achieving sole custody of children and
creating fatherlessness."
Identified Issue: Canadian Law Societies' General Failure to Self
Regulate, Members permitted to Lie in Court, Anne Cools' Bill 2-12
provides an answer
2004-06-08 SENATOR ANNE COOLS LEAVES LIBERAL FOLD TO JOIN
Senator Anne Cools Runs Away With The Suns's 10 Top Women Poll, Kevin
Connor, TO Sun
2004-06-08 Liberal senator < Anne Cools > goes Conservative
1997-10-28 Child Custody and Access Reform, Special Joint Committee
Established
More:
Issues: Cools,
Senator Anne
Issues: False Accusations;
Isues Womens Shelters' Scam
Issues:Senator Anne
Cools
News: Liberal Hedy Fry /
Status of Women (SOW):
Issues: Pedophiles
Fear Dads |
Darrin White,
RIP of Prince George, BC

Death by Judicial
Kleptomania
- Manslaughter, Suicide, March 2000
Darrin White, suicide, Prince George - Google Search;
Darrin White, suicide, Prince George - Google Video
"Darren
White died in March of 2000 by his own hand. BC Supreme Court
Master Doug Baker had just ordered Darren to pay
$2,071 per
month in child and spousal support. His monthly income at the time
of that order was only $950 after taxes.
..He
was also paying $439 a month to support an
older child from a
previous marriage.
...
No one would listen to my father
, no one would give him a chance to speak. ... My dad was an abused
husband, he was abused by his wife, and the justice system. ... He
was a kind man who fought a good fight but no matter what he did or
said, he could never win with this system. "
More...
Testimonials: Darren
White, RIP
Testimonials:
Mark Dexel, RIP of Kamloops, BC;
Testimonials:
Manley, Perry: RIP
Testimonials:
Jeffery,
Hal & Danica
Issues:
Custody Orders not Enforced;
Issues: Parental
Alienation Syndrome;
Issues: Imputed income;
Issues: Child
Support Fraud;
Issues: Debtors' Prison
Reinstituted |
Beware of the "Parental Rights" IMPOSTER!!!!

"Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights"
Be on the lookout for the "Parent's Rights"
IMPOSTER. Insist on "Natural Parents Only", please!
It comes as a big surprise to us that many groups
that present themselves as
"Parents Rights" groups REFUSE to defend the
NATURAL PARENT, and and to demand
RESTORATION of
Natural Parents Rights taken from Canadians in the
Homosexual Marriage
legislation.

Instead their position to promote the "rights" of
a "Parent" in the widest sense of the word, making NO distinction
between NATURAL PARENTS and wannaabe
Legal Parents. They have bowed to
University of Victoria's
assertion that the SCC's
Trociuk Decision
"endorses a
Heterosexual View of the Family and must be ignored",
legitimizing the ongoing
Child
Trafficking by the State which views
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in the
lucrative Child Adoption
Market They refuse to be hampered by prior obligations to that
pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can
Veto an Adoption.


It appears that many
"Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United Nations and
Liberal Irwin Cotler's
assertion that the
Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent has
"NO RIGHTS", making the
State, not the Natural Parents the
Protector of the Child..
Without
Cause or Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!
More: About:
Beware of the IMPOSTER!!!! "Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's
Rights";
News:
Lessard, Hester - Heterosexual view of Parenthood must be ignored
News: Smith, Judge
Daphne, BCSC, for Child Trafficking;
Issues: Trociuk,
Darrell;
Issues:
Child Trafficking, Canadian;
Testimonials:
Rick Fredrickson of Saskatoon |
|

Anne Cools - Google Search

Anne Cools' Website
Anne Cools
on False Accusations
EP Nemesis,
Liberal Hedy Fry, the Queen of FALSE ACCUSERS
"Honourable senators know that I have studied a terrible and pernicious
heart of darkness that has developed in our court system, being the use
of
FALSE ACCUSATIONS in civil justice.
This is
the mischief of litigating parties, usually mothers, suddenly within the
context of divorce and within child custody proceedings falsely accusing
the other party, usually fathers, of the sexual abuse of their own
children. ,,,
These
FALSE ALLEGATIONS are often made with the overt or covert complicity
of their lawyers. They are a lethal weapon in the business of parental
alienation. They are a tool for achieving sole custody of children and
creating fatherlessness."
More:
Issues: Cools,
Senator Anne |
|

We are also fortunate to have
Jay Hill, MP
(Prince George – Peace River) here in British Columbia.
“I’m
pushing for equality —both parents should have equal rights and equal
access to their child,”
Hill said. “The courts
seem to start from the premise that somehow fathers aren’t responsible
parents. But both parents are deemed good parents as long as the
marriage lasts; why are they not when the marriage ends?”
More:
Jay's site;
Iissues: Hill, MP Jay. |

We are fortunate in British Columbia to have a
number of pro-family parliamentarians. Of particular
prominence is Paul Forseth,
M.P. - member of the "For the Sake of the Children"
Committee, co-author of the
Dissenting Opinions, and a staunch advocate of pro-family
concerns. Paul has put in many years pushing to have Equal
Parenting issues brought forward to the Canadian Parliament, and
faced fierce opposition from the Prime Minister. Both
Paul and Senator Cools have pressed on to redeem fathers from groups
like the Status of Women (SOW) enduring multiple death
threats from various radical feminist groups while serving on the
Committee. These MPs are tough.
Monday Nov.7th 2005 Dear Equal
Parenting-BC: "Conservatives are committed to
Shared Parenting. The national party “Policy Declaration” that was
passed by delegates at our March 2005 Montreal convention says
clearly that: 65. Shared Parenting: A
Conservative Government will make the necessary changes to the
Divorce Act to ensure that in the event of a marital breakdown, the
Divorce Act will allow both parents and all grandparents to maintain
a meaningful relationship with their children and grandchildren,
unless it is clearly demonstrated not to be in the best interests of
the children.
My Liberal colleagues that served with me on
the Senate-Commons committee that wrote the “For
the Sake of the Children report, admitted that they have
little confidence that their Party will ever enact the needed
amendments to the Divorce Act, that completely fulfills the report
recommendations. The NDP opposed us during the Committee process,
and have never been supportive of dads.
Conservatives are the only hope for fairness
and reasonableness in Divorce and Family Law. I encourage those who
care, to focus their energy where it will help the most, by working
to elect as many Conservatives as possible. I hope that the many who
are frustrated, not become sidetracked into protest, which does
nothing during an election but undercut our ability to make good
things happen. The Liberals and the NDP will say anything in an
election to get a vote, but they will never deliver “shared
parenting”. Every vote that does not go to a Conservative in the
next election is a vote against “shared parenting”.
Paul Forseth MP |
|

Although not from British Columbia, and less familiar
to us, we cannot neglect to recognize the solid support of once Liberal
MP, Rodger Gallaway of
Sarnia. Gallaway and Cools were frequently photographed together
while championing the rights of children to both
NATURAL PARENTS. |
McKenzie & Pedersen, the "Two Robs",
Equal Parenting Bike Trek US 2006, 2007...

Robb MacKenzie Equal Parenting Bike Trek - Google Search;
Robb MacKenzie Equal Parenting Bike Trek - Google Video

Rob Pederson, Equal Parenting - Google Search;
Robert Pederson, Equal Parenting - Google Video

Cycling4Children.com Equal Parenting Bike Trek's photostream
More:
Issues:
McKenzie & Pedersen, the "Two Robs", Equal Parenting Bike Trek US 2006,
2007...;
Issues: Smith,
Ron: DC Family Preservation Rally, Compulsory Drugging of
Children;
Issues:
Compulsory Drugging of Children, Thymerisol; |
Allan Rock, Liberal:




Imprisonment & Removal of Drivers' Licenses, Passports for
Non-Payment of Imputed FMEP Debts, UN's Agenda 21 Implementation,
Termination of Free Speech
Allan rock, liberal - Google Search;
Allan rock, liberal - Google Search


More:
News: Rock, Allan,
Liberal: Imprisonment & Removal of Drivers' Licenses,
Passports for Non-Payment of FMEP Debts;
News:
Houle, Francois / University of Ottawa: Canada's Speech Crime Laws
Issues:
Coulter, Ann: Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Assembly;
Issues: Paul, Ron;
Issues: "Hate
Crime"
Thought Police, Tyranny of Human Rights Tribunals;
News: Robinson,
Svend
NDP MP, Lawyer & Thief for "Hate Crimes" Legislation;
Issues: "Special
Prosecutors" for Lawyers & Judges; |
Bill Graham, Pedophile Parliamentarian & Defense Minister


Bill Graham, mp - Google Search;
Bill Graham, mp - Google Video
Lawrence Metherel - Google Search
2007-06-19 Liberal MP Bill Graham announces resignation
"In spite of credible revelations dating back to
April 2002 about Bill Graham, a sex addicted bi-sexual sodomizing a 15
year old male prostitute named
Lawrence Metherel, Paul Martin
allowed Graham to remain
Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister - and eventually named him to the
portfolio of Minister of Defense.
"On Sept. 28/2005 a vote was held in Parliament to raise the age of
consent from 14 (one of the lowest age of consents in the world) to 16
(an age which many still consider too low).
"Bill Graham, Paul Martin, and Anne McLellan, on
Sept. 28th, voted against raising the age of consent to 16


More: News:
Graham, Bill: Pedophile Parliamentarian, Defense Minister |
Barbara Kay, National Post

Barbara Kay - Google Search;
Barbara Kay - Google Video
"In
Ontario alone, the names
Cornwall, Prescott, and London became synonymous with "respectable"
pedophile rings -- lawyers, doctors, police officers and Catholic
clergymen -- that for decades preyed on society's most vulnerable boys."
2008-04-22 We're
still ignoring abused straight men, Barbara Kay;
2007-09-26 Forgetting the male victims of child abuse, Barbara Kay
2006-06-14 Welcome to the matriarchy, Barbara Kay;


More....
Issues: Barbara Kay, National Post;
Testimonials: Prior, Byron: Sexual Abuse;
News:
Mount Cashel Orphanage, St. John's NL;
Issues:
Boys Of St. Vincent <Mount Cashel, NL>
News: Southin, Mary: BC Judge
backs Pedophilia, Solicitation of Children for Sexual Activities;
News: Ramsay, Judge David
BC Judge & Pedophile
News: Orr, Judge David:
Protection of Pedophiles in Public Service;
News: Hickman, T. Alex,
NL Judge, alleged Pedophile & Town Tyrant
Testimonials:
Earle, Shane: Mount Cashel Orphange, NL;
Testimonials: Samson,
Pierre: Duplessis Orphans, QU
News: Duplessis
Orphans: Nazi Experiments
Orphange, NL
Issues: Child Trafficking
by Public Officers & Judges;
Issues: Judicial
Freemasonry
Issues: Judicial
Interpretation;
News:
Crowley, Aleister: Luciferian Freemasonry, Homosexual Pedophilia &
Pederasty; |





































































Equal Parenting Trek - US: Equal Parenting
Roundups from Seattle & LA to Washington DC

|
| |
Beware of the "Parental Rights" IMPOSTER!!!!
"Natural Parent's Rights" Vs
"Parent's Rights"
|
Beware of the IMPOSTER!!!!
"Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights"
It comes as a big surprise to us
that the majority of Canadian groups that present themselves as "Parents
Rights" groups do NOT subscribe our position
that it is the
NATURAL PARENT
who's rights are being robbed, making Family Courts
an over-the-counter
Child Trafficking business . Perhaps this
will surprise you also. Perhaps you too, have been
duped.
It appears to be normal in
Canada, that that what calls
itself a "Parent's Rights" group - at
least those with funding and prominence - is being
run from the perspective of
Homosexual Activists and Step Parents wishing to
displace Natural Parents.
They insist
that ALL the classes of "parents", be they
Homosexual Lovers of a Natural Parent,
Step-Parents,
Legal
Parents,
Foster
Parents and so on must be given equal status in Law
with Natural Parents, and what
Statutory Amendments must must reflect a "modern"
view of the Family which is "Community" or
"Constellation" rather than "Nuclear" family
consisting of a Natural Father and Mother living
together or apart. They are EXTREMELY hostile
to our view that it is the
NATURAL PARENT
that is being robbed of their historic and
Common
Law rights to be the Custodians of their Natural
Children until they attain an Age of Majority.
They are EXTREMELY insistent that
attention NOT be brought to the ELIMINATION of
Natural Parents' Rights in the Canadian
Homosexual Marriage legislation.
We know
of no major "Father's Rights" group in Canada which
is not scrutinized and actively censures it's Member
by those defending Homosexual displacement of
Natural Parents.
At Meetings they harangue, mock and overtalk you. In blogs and Yahoo groups they
expel you. Some join
Canadian Gay Parades where children are
painted up, cross-dressed, and forced to accept
public nudity, homosexual sex acts public
demonstrations of sex acts, flagrant law-breaking
and Cross-Dressing as their lifestyle. Recall
at least 40%
and maybe 50% of Judges are Homosexual.
and that promoting Homosexuality has been identified
as a vehicle to reduce
World
Population by the
Club
of Rome and the
Rockefellers. for at least forty years.
 More:
About: Beware of the IMPOSTER!!!! "Natural Parent's
Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights";
News:
Lessard, Hester - Heterosexual view of Parenthood must be
ignored
News:
Smith, Judge Daphne, BCSC, for Child Trafficking;
Issues: Trociuk, Darrell;
Issues:
Child Trafficking, Canadian;
Testimonials:
Rick Fredrickson of Saskatoon
|
My Experience with "Mens Groups"
in Vancouver, BC
This echoes this writers'
experience in the first years of Separation. I
was told by the Social Services "Helpline" to go to
certain
"Men's Groups"
- these groups were funded for this purpose - and
they gave me a list of groups to attend.. I
did. I couldn't understand why nobody there
had children or understand my anxiety over not
knowing where my children were,
where my
wife was, etc.. Their concerns always seems to
revolve around my sexual activity - or lack thereof
- insisting it was "unhealthy" that I hadn't had sex
for <some time>.
Over the months, they kept
wanting me to go to dinner with them to "relax" and
go camping with them where we would go into a Sweat
Lodge, oil each other down and "Beat our Drums",.
I said "No Thank you", and kept coming back hoping
to find a Dad who could help me out with Family
Court. As
I recall no Dad showed up at that group.
After a couple of months or so, a trio of total
Flamers started showing up, which I tried to ignore.
During the Meeting the "regular" guys told me again
how important for "Men's Health" that I have sex.
They nodded at the "Flamers" saying they were
available to do the dirty deed, that they really
liked doing it, and told me I should just close my eyes and
imagine it was a woman. I would feel a lot
better afterwards, they said.
After a few Meetings with me
trying to brush them off, they got pretty aggressive
with me, and demanded an answer as to why I would care whether it was a man or a woman? I
was there for help with my family problems on the
advise of the "Helpline" and all these guys cared
about was my 'sexual health' and putting me on the defensive about why I wouldn't
accept the oral services they were offering!!!
I never went back there again.
I went to another group on the List. The
second group the "Leader" made a point of
introducing himself as a Homosexual, which I tried
to ignore. He was a very nice fellow, but
completely incapable of being any assistance on
Family Court . He told us his Story.... that
he was raised without a father, and that he was
desperately lonely alone in the house while his
mother worked. At five, his only friend it
seemed was a man in the neighborhood who spent time
with him, comforted him while he lay face down on
the floor by by stroking his legs. In
time he was seduced into a homosexual relationship.
All the while, his mother was too busy to know what
was going on at home while she was at work. He
was careful to point out, though his first sexual
experience being with the neighborhood pedophile
this had nothing to do with his being Homosexual.
He claimed he was "born" a Homosexual.
I didn't have the heart to tell
him there had just been a study released that had
interviewed thousands of homosexuals and asked
them hundreds of questions seeking the factors
that that correlated with homosexuality.
The MOST HIGHLY CORRELATED FACTOR WAS "RAISED
WITHOUT A FATHER".
Other studies, BTW, have shown
that
"Last Born Male". is highly correlated with
homosexuality. Both of these stats tell you
that genetics hasn't a lot to do with homosexual
origins.
Eventually I quit that group and
went to another on the List..... which also
seemed pretty fruity with the oil, the sweat lodges,
etc, so I went to yet another. Same old stuff
there, too.
At this point I quit going
to "Men's groups"
Many years later, I was told to
go to a government funded private office for
"Counseling" during the years of my having been put
onto "Supervised Access" because I had caught my
child's teacher shoving him onto the school floor
and then darting away when she saw me entering the
room. I had foolishly gone to the School Board
to report her.
The School
Board's response was to have an Order of Supervised
Access made out in which a Condition of us seeing
each other was that neither of us could "speak
negatively" of the teacher whom I witnessed shoving
him onto the ground, and whom he said had been doing
this for months, but he had been forbidden to say
anything about it to me. He was
still very compliant on those days but fortunately
he learned to rebel over the course of the
Supervision.
The Bulletin Board of the
government funded private office was packed with
pamphlets and notices on STDs, Homosexuality,
"Coming Out", Abortion rights, and of course loads
of pamphlets about "Living in an Abuse Relationship"
with a man which ultimately will lead to Male
Violence. Curiously there were plenty of
pamphlets too about
Lesbians Battering Women, addressing the
bizarrely high rate of violence and murder in
homosexual pairs I had never guessed at until a
criminal lawyer tipped me off..
In due time, I made regular
complaints there about the Bulletin Board, that they
had no programs or Meeting Space for NCP Dads.
(I was hoping we could have Meeting there, and
described what we might do.) Some months later the
bulletin board was stripped, and I was told they
were starting a "Dad's" group, which they
thought I should attend, and I should round up the
Dads and bring them along.
Wouldn't you know it, they
rejected the Volunteer model, I suggested, and had
HIRED a couple of guys to run the program. One
was an openly gay bottom, and the other who was at
least a very aggressive domineering Homophile.
You have to wonder why the government jobs keep
going to these guys. Our guess after going to
a Courthouse with a lawyer friend and seeing how
things work down there, we have coined the phrase "Sexual
Nepotism".to explain the rather obvious power
base taking over many government offices.
We were expected to recite with
the Leader a Prayer to a strange "earth goddess"
type of Deity at the end of the Meetings - an
obviously New Age perv-Version of a Recovery Group's
"God, grant me the Serenity ...."
prayer.
 More:
About: Beware of the IMPOSTER!!!! "Natural Parent's
Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights";
News:
Lessard, Hester - Heterosexual view of Parenthood must be
ignored
News:
Smith, Judge Daphne, BCSC, for Child Trafficking;
Issues: Trociuk, Darrell;
Issues:
Child Trafficking, Canadian;
Testimonials:
Rick Fredrickson of Saskatoon
|
Attributing "Parental Rights" to anyone
other than a Natural Parent thieves children from
their Natural Parents.
This
position, which is so common - that ALL varieties of
a "Parent" must be treated equally - is inherently
HOSTILE to the rights of a
NATURAL PARENT and their
NATURAL CHILD.
To our knowledge what government funding exists goes
to groups that press for the rights of the "LEGAL
PARENT" and by nature sidelines the
interests of the
NATURAL PARENT.
Just think about that for a
second. Who is it that decides who the "Legal
Parent" is? It is the Courts. And
who is it that is running the Courts, since the
Courts refuse to conform to the
Supremacy of Parliament?
When you fund a "Parents" group you would be well
advised to make sure you are not funding the Natural
Enemy of Natural Parents, the Court appointed
"LEGAL PARENT" and are in fact funding a
group that seeks to defeat the rights of a
NATURAL PARENT in favor of a
Step-Parent, a
Legal Parent, a
Homosexual Lover of a Natural Parent, or a
Foster Parent.
More:
Issues: Poofy
Judges
Issues: Lively, Scott: "Pink Swastika",
Homosexuality and the Nazi Party;
Issues: Lynette
Burrows, Psychologist warns on Pedophiles;
Issues:
Homosexual Activism;
Issues: Judicial
Activism; |
Two Kinds of "Equal Parenting"
There are two kinds of
"Equal Parenting" groups:
There are those like us
who confine their arguments for
Equal Parenting to
Natural Parents only, and for the
Natural Grandparents. who in the Natural
Parent's absence must be be permitted to
stand as an Equal Parent against the present
Natural Parent.. We say:"Without
CAUSE or CONSENT no Child
shall be removed from a
Natural Parent."
To our amazement we find
that the majority of "Parenting Rights"
groups with which we are familiar REFUSE to
confine their arguments for primacy of
Parental Rights to NATURAL PARENTS,
We think that for the average hearer,
this is deceptive and a fraud.
They average person, we think, will assume
that "Equal Parenting" refers to the two
Natural Parents only.
Most
"Equal Parenting":
groups when we press them on the Natural
Parents' question eventually take the
position that
"there are MANY classes of
people NOT related by blood to the Child
whose "rights" are being infringed upon when
they are not awarded "Equal Parenting"
rights with the Natural Parents.
They often claim that by
spending time with a Child, one can accrue
Parental Rights. We REJECT this
completely.
They say that by
developing
a social relationship with a
Natural Parents or a Child, basically
any adult
living in the same household as the
Child
can
accrue Parental
Rights which must be "respected".
Oddly only the
man the mother claims is the father
is required to
pay
Child Support
and pay the living expenses of these
Interlopers..
FYI
the custom of the Courts is that an
unmarried man accused of fathering a Child
cannot require a
Paternity Test, before having his wages
gleaned. Again
False
Accusations with Impunity for women are
fully supported by these "Femi-Nazi"
courts..
Neither will a Natural
father be granted an
Adoption
Veto thanks to
BC
Judge Daphne Smith!!! Fathers are now
being required to bay
Child Support
to
Adoptive Parents to whom he has lost a
Custody Battle.

We think it's
blatantly obvious that you can't ascribe
Parental Rights to anyone but the two
Natural Parents (or the
Natural Grandparents & Natural Siblings
in their absence) without treating
Human Beings like cattle whose children are
a commodity you can sell for profit
into the lucrative
Child Trafficking market. We
reject their assertion a person other than
the two Natural Parents have Parental Rights
upon the conception of any Child. and that
these rights are strengthened the longer the
Natural Parent is kept from their child.
The
Courts and Lawyers will love the confusion
they've brought to this simple
question
by giving
"Equal Parenting" to Step Parents and
Lesbian Lovers of a Natural
Parent.
|
|
Beware of the "Parental Rights" IMPOSTER!!!!

"Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights"
Be on the
lookout for the "Parent's Rights" IMPOSTER.
Insist on "Natural Parents Only", please!
It comes as a big surprise to us
that many groups that present themselves as
"Parents
Rights" groups REFUSE to defend the
NATURAL PARENT, and
and to demand RESTORATION of
Natural Parents Rights taken from Canadians in the
Homosexual Marriage
legislation.

Instead
their position to promote the "rights" of a
"Parent" in the widest sense of the word, making
NO distinction between
NATURAL PARENTS and wannaabe
Legal Parents. They have bowed to
University of
Victoria's assertion that the SCC's
Trociuk Decision
"endorses a Heterosexual View of the Family and must be ignored",
legitimizing the ongoing
Child
Trafficking by the State which views
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in the
lucrative Child Adoption Market They
refuse to be hampered by prior obligations to that pesky Natural
Parent who thinks they can
Veto an Adoption.


It appears that many
"Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United
Nations and Liberal Irwin
Cotler's assertion that the
Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent has
"NO RIGHTS", making
the State, not the Natural Parents
the Protector of the Child..
Without Cause or Consent,
no Child shall be
removed from a Natural Parent!!!
More:
About: Beware of the IMPOSTER!!!! "Natural Parent's
Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights";
News:
Lessard, Hester - Heterosexual view of Parenthood must be
ignored
News:
Smith, Judge Daphne, BCSC, for Child Trafficking;
Issues: Trociuk, Darrell;
Issues:
Child Trafficking, Canadian;
Testimonials:
Rick Fredrickson of Saskatoon
|
Scott Lively,
"Pink Swastika"

Homosexuality and the Nazi
Party
Scott Lively - Google Search
Scott Lively - Google Videos
:... many leaders in the German Nazi regime, including
Adolf Hitler himself, were homosexual .. eight of the top
ten
serial killers in the US were homosexuals."
book_1995-LIVELY-pink-swastika.pdf.zip


 




 More:
Issues: Lively, Scott: "Pink Swastika", Homosexuality and
the Nazi Party;
Issues: Lynette
Burrows, Psychologist warns on Pedophiles;
Issues:
Homosexual Activism;
Issues: Judicial
Activism;
Issues: Poofy Judges;
News: Skull &
Bones, 322, Yale;
Issues:
Sutton, Anhony C: Wall Street & the Rise of Hitler;
Issues:
Iserbyt, Charlotte: Dumbing Down
News:
Weishaupt, Adam: Illuminati Founder;
;
Issues: Dennis L.
Cuddy, PhD;
Issues: Monteith, Dr.
Stanley: Tax Exempt Foundations:
|
Alfred Kinsey: Rockefeller Research in Pedophilia &
Falsified Reporting

Alfred Kinsey - Google Search;
Alfred Kinsey - Google Video
Sexual psychopath. His
'data' mostly came from sexual psychopaths, sex offenders,
criminals, paedophiles, male prostitutes, and promiscuous
homosexuals. Two of his "co-investigators" were serial
rapists:
Rex King, convicted of 800 counts of child rape involving
both sexes, and
Fritz von Balluseck, an ex-Nazi convicted of the rape-murder
of a ten-year-old girl in Berlin
Kinsey solicited and encouraged pedophiles, at home and abroad,
to sexually violate from 317 to 2,035 infants and children for
his alleged data on normal "child sexuality."
|
|
|