Guy Fawkes thumbnail

Remember, Remember the 5th of November,
The gunpowder treason and plot, I see no reason why Gunpowder Treason
should ever be forgot

    ● EP-BC Home About  Issues   News  Testimonials  Reference   Fun Stuff Members


About Area Home

Families-4-Justice & Fathers-4-Justice
SOS = Spouses of Survivors, PIH
Beware of the IMPOSTER!!!!
Contact Us at Equal Parenting-BC
Equal Parenting How To's
Grandparents in Equal Parenting
Equal Parenting Q & A
Equal Parenting as Consent Agreement
Equal Parenting as a Living Will
EPA = Equal Parenting Anonymous
EPA Meeting Formats
EPR = Equal Parenting Roundups
EPR March, How To
EPT = Equal Parenting Trek
Equal Parenting Trek Calendar

Equal Parenting How To's

Equal Parenting is like a Three Layer Cake. 

"Without Cause or Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!

"Two Equal Parents may .. agree to unequal Parenting Time, but this does NOT impugn the Parental Authority of either Natural Parent relative to Third Party Interlopers.

1.  The Bottom Layer:  The Initial Equal Parenting Agreement

Initial Equal Parenting Agreement creating full time, all time equality of both natural parents, subordinate to no third parties (a Constitutional right ignored by most Family Courts); a series of tentative Parenting Timetables for each year and statement of intent, or  "Wishes"; the requirement that the tentative Parenting Timetable laid out there will be reviewed and finalized annually and incorporated into the Annual Parenting Supplement.  Parental authority and discretion is always equal and unaffected by inequalities of Parenting Time allocations.

2.  Middle Layer:  The Annual Supplement & its Parenting Timetable

At-A-Glance® Erasable Yearly Vertical Jumbo Wall Calendar, 48" x 32", 2005Yearly Annual Parenting Supplements for planning the school year and finalizing the Parenting Timetable for the upcoming  parenting year.  Parenting Timetable must meet the test for equality established in 1) the initial Equal Parenting Agreement.

3.  Top Layer:  Autonomy of Both Equal Parents on all matters not previously Constrained.

Parenting Timetable alternates all residual parenting questions between the two otherwise equal parents who are subordinate to no third parties.  Full autonomy of each parent during their Parenting Time as allotted in the agreed Parenting Timetable on all residual parenting questions not previously constrained by Covenants in the initial Equal Parenting Agreement, or the current Annual Parenting Supplement.  Full discretion on residual parenting with the Timetabled Parent, but flexibility encouraged and provided by Ad Hoc Agreements.

4.  Icing on the Cake.....

Forget about the Courts, and your Ex, and go have fun with your kids!!!







More:  About:  Equal Parenting How To's:  Three Layer Cake;
About:  Grandparents in Equal Parenting;
About:  EPR = Equal Parenting Roundups;
About: EPT =  Equal Parenting Trek;
About:  EP Trek Generic Calendar:
Issues:  Kinship Families or Grandparents raising Children::

Senator Anne Cools, FTSOTC Chair on False Accusations &
Law Societies' permitting Lawyers to Lie in Court

Senator Anne Cools, FTSOTC Chair, formerly Liberal, now Conservative

Anne Cools - Google Search
Anne Cools - Google Video

Anne Cools' Website
 Anne Cools on False Accusations

EP Nemesis, Liberal Hedy Fry, the Queen of FALSE ACCUSERS

"Honourable senators know that I have studied a terrible and pernicious heart of darkness that has developed in our court system, being the use of FALSE ACCUSATIONS in civil justice.

This is the mischief of litigating parties, usually mothers, suddenly within the context of divorce and within child custody proceedings falsely accusing the other party, usually fathers, of the sexual abuse of their own children.    ,,,    

These FALSE ALLEGATIONS are often made with the overt or covert complicity of their lawyers. They are a lethal weapon in the business of parental alienation. They are a tool for achieving sole custody of children and creating fatherlessness."

Identified Issue: Canadian Law Societies' General Failure to Self Regulate, Members permitted to Lie in Court, Anne Cools' Bill 2-12 provides an answer

2004-06-08  SENATOR ANNE COOLS LEAVES LIBERAL FOLD TO JOIN   

Senator Anne Cools Runs Away With The Suns's 10 Top Women Poll, Kevin Connor, TO Sun

2004-06-08  Liberal senator < Anne Cools >  goes Conservative

1997-10-28 Child Custody and Access Reform, Special Joint Committee Established

More:  Issues:  Cools, Senator Anne
Issues: False Accusations;
Isues Womens Shelters' Scam
Issues:Senator Anne Cools
News:  Liberal Hedy Fry / Status of Women (SOW):
Issues:  Pedophiles Fear Dads

Liberal Irwin Cotler:  "Natural Parents have NO RIGHTS"

Irwin Cotler, former Liberal "Justice" Minister robbed Canadians of their NATURAL PARENTS' Rights

Irwin Cotler - Google Search;
Irwin Cotler - Google Video


"Natural Parents have NO RIGHTS....  ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....

"Natural Parents' Rights now  gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"

16.10 Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to conform to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal BREACH OF TRUST"


FYI, the ideas that the State assigns Rights & Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from pre-war Nazi Germany.   Under the British system rights are not State-given, but God Given.

Buying into the Court's position that what rights remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same position that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.

More:  News:  Cotler, Irwin:  "Natural Parents have NO RIGHTS...;
News:  European Union;
Issues:  Paul Watson:  Nazi Origins of European Union;;;
Issues: G. Edward  Griffin ;
Issues: Fabian Socialism;

Darrin White, RIP of Prince George, BC

Death by Judicial Kleptomania - Manslaughter, Suicide, March 2000

Darrin White, suicide, Prince George - Google Search;
Darrin White, suicide, Prince George - Google Video

"Darren White died in March of 2000 by his own hand. BC Supreme Court Master Doug Baker had just ordered Darren to pay $2,071 per month in child and spousal support. His monthly income at the time of that order was only $950 after taxes.  

..He was also paying $439 a month to support an older child from a previous marriage.

... No one would listen to my father , no one would give him a chance to speak. ... My dad was an abused husband, he was abused by his wife, and the justice system.  ... He was a kind man who fought a good fight but no matter what he did or said, he could never win with this system."

More...   Testimonials: Darren White, RIP
Testimonials:  Mark Dexel, RIP of Kamloops, BC;
Testimonials:  Manley, Perry:  RIP
Testimonials:  Jeffery, Hal & Danica
Issues:  Custody Orders not Enforced;
Issues:  Parental Alienation Syndrome;
Issues:  Imputed income;
Issues:  Child Support Fraud;
Issues:  Debtors' Prison Reinstituted

Beware of the "Parental Rights" IMPOSTER!!!!

"Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights"

Be on the lookout for the "Parent's Rights" IMPOSTER.  Insist on "Natural Parents Only", please!

It comes as a big surprise to us that many groups that present themselves as "Parents Rights" groups  REFUSE to defend the  NATURAL PARENT, and  and to demand RESTORATION of Natural Parents Rights taken from Canadians in the Homosexual Marriage legislation.

Instead their position to promote the "rights" of  a "Parent" in the widest sense of the word, making NO distinction  between NATURAL PARENTS and wannaabe Legal Parents.  They have bowed to University of Victoria's  assertion that  the SCC's Trociuk Decision "endorses a Heterosexual View of the Family and must be ignored", legitimizing the ongoing Child Trafficking by the State which views Canadian children as State Property and merchandise for  sale in the lucrative Child Adoption Market  They refuse to be hampered by prior obligations to that pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can Veto an Adoption.


It appears that many "Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United Nations and Liberal Irwin Cotler's assertion that the Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent has "NO RIGHTS", making the State, not the Natural Parents the Protector of the Child..

Without Cause or Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!

More:  About:  Beware of the IMPOSTER!!!!  "Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights";
News:  Lessard, Hester - Heterosexual view of Parenthood must be ignored
News:  Smith, Judge Daphne, BCSC, for Child Trafficking;
Issues:  Trociuk, Darrell;
Issues:  Child Trafficking, Canadian;
Testimonials:  Rick Fredrickson of Saskatoon

Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges and Legal Oligarchy

Chapter VII. The English Common Law. Section 57. The Norman Conquest

A beautiy of British  Common Law is that it is STATIC, and NOT DYNAMIC as these Activist Judges would have you think.

Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and they will likely tell you it is "Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say "Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these days"

This is completely FALSE.  The Judges are Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever.  Since 1649, only PARLIAMENT has the Capacity to make Law.

British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was only observed and documented by individuals sent out by the newly Norman Crown after the Norman Conquest of 1066  to observe and codify the laws and customs of the various peoples of Britain..  This was done with a view to aggregate existing customs which may vary across the land,  into a unified body of Laws.  The Authority quoted by the Commoners in their administration of Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the Bible and principles of Danelaw

The process of documentation took only a couple of hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body of Law which was historical, popular, and has served in the intervening centuries as a Benchmark against which Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".  It does NOT change.

More:   Issues:  Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges and Legal Oligarchy;
Issues:  "Judicial Interpretation" to pervert Statutes of Parliament;
Issues:  Judicial Activism is Breach of Trust;
Issues:  Judicial Globalization is Treason

Equal Parenting Roundups for Natural Parents' Rights

An EP Roundup is a gathering of NATURAL parental rights groups that are within driving distance of one another.

An "Equal Parenting Roundup" is a gathering of all the disparate parental rights groups that are within driving distance of one another.  Whereas any group can call an "Ad Hoc" Roundup with their neihbors, we hope you will have at least one annual EP Roundup an incorporate it into the Equal Parenting Trek

An Equal Parenting Roundup is an exercise in your Freedom of Assembly and Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Assembly, following some of the traditions that established our Supremacy of Parliament

More:  About:  EPR = Equal Parenting Roundups;
About: EPT =  Equal Parenting Trek;
EP Trek Generic Calendar;
About:  Equal Parenting How To's:  Three Layer Cake;
About:  Grandparents in Equal Parenting;
About:  EPR = Equal Parenting Roundups;
About: EPT =  Equal Parenting Trek;
EP Trek Generic Calendar:Issues:  Kinship Families or Grandparents raising Children::
About:  Grandparents in Equal

Equal Parenting Trek, an annual "Progressive Convention" of Equal Parenting Roundups

More:  About:  EPT =  Equal Parenting Trek;
About:  EPR = Equal Parenting Roundups;
Meetings:  EP Trek Generic Calendar

Senator Anne Cools on the Evil of False Accusations

Anne Cools - Google Search

Anne Cools' Website
 Anne Cools on False Accusations

EP Nemesis, Liberal Hedy Fry, the Queen of FALSE ACCUSERS

"Honourable senators know that I have studied a terrible and pernicious heart of darkness that has developed in our court system, being the use of FALSE ACCUSATIONS in civil justice.

This is the mischief of litigating parties, usually mothers, suddenly within the context of divorce and within child custody proceedings falsely accusing the other party, usually fathers, of the sexual abuse of their own children.    ,,,    

These FALSE ALLEGATIONS are often made with the overt or covert complicity of their lawyers. They are a lethal weapon in the business of parental alienation. They are a tool for achieving sole custody of children and creating fatherlessness."

More:  Issues:  Cools, Senator Anne

Jay Hill, MP (Prince George – Peace River)

We are also fortunate to have Jay Hill, MP (Prince George – Peace River)  here in British Columbia. 

“I’m pushing for equality —both parents should have equal rights and equal access to their child,” Hill said. “The courts seem to start from the premise that somehow fathers aren’t responsible parents. But both parents are deemed good parents as long as the marriage lasts; why are they not when the marriage ends?”   

More:   Jay's site;
Iissues:  Hill, MP Jay.

Paul Forseth, past M.P., (New Westminster-Coquitlam-Burnaby)

We are fortunate in British Columbia to have a number of pro-family parliamentarians.  Of particular prominence is Paul Forseth, M.P. -  member of the "For the Sake of the Children" Committee, co-author of the Dissenting Opinions, and a staunch advocate of pro-family concerns.  Paul has put in many years pushing to have Equal Parenting issues brought forward to the Canadian Parliament, and faced fierce opposition from the Prime Minister.   Both Paul and Senator Cools have pressed on to redeem fathers from groups like the Status of Women (SOW) enduring multiple death threats from various radical feminist groups while serving on the Committee.  These MPs are tough.

Monday Nov.7th 2005   Dear Equal Parenting-BC:    "Conservatives are committed to Shared Parenting. The national party “Policy Declaration” that was passed by delegates at our March 2005 Montreal convention says clearly that:   65. Shared Parenting:    A Conservative Government will make the necessary changes to the Divorce Act to ensure that in the event of a marital breakdown, the Divorce Act will allow both parents and all grandparents to maintain a meaningful relationship with their children and grandchildren, unless it is clearly demonstrated not to be in the best interests of the children.    

My Liberal colleagues that served with me on the Senate-Commons committee that wrote the “For the Sake of the Children report, admitted that they have little confidence that their Party will ever enact the needed amendments to the Divorce Act, that completely fulfills the report recommendations. The NDP opposed us during the Committee process, and have never been supportive of dads.

Conservatives are the only hope for fairness and reasonableness in Divorce and Family Law. I encourage those who care, to focus their energy where it will help the most, by working to elect as many Conservatives as possible. I hope that the many who are frustrated, not become sidetracked into protest, which does nothing during an election but undercut our ability to make good things happen. The Liberals and the NDP will say anything in an election to get a vote, but they will never deliver “shared parenting”. Every vote that does not go to a Conservative in the next election is a vote against “shared parenting”. Paul Forseth MP

Betty Hinton, MP (Kamloops Thompson)

Many thanks to  Kamloops MP Betty Hinton for standing up in Parliament  for us against the State funded FATHER HATRED of the Status of Women.  For an example of Betty's provocative advocacy, see:  Betty Hinton, Kamloops Thompson MP speaks against SOW's promotion of Father Hatred

Roger Gallaway, MP (Sarnia-Lambton, ON, Liberal)

Although not from British Columbia, and less familiar to us, we cannot neglect to recognize the solid support of once Liberal MP, Rodger Gallaway of Sarnia.  Gallaway and Cools were frequently photographed together while championing the rights of children to both NATURAL PARENTS.

Arnie Hein's, "Cross My Heart" Equal Parenting Trek CA 2005

Arnie Hein "Cross My Heart" - Google Search;
Arnie Hein "Cross My Heart" - Google Video

Arnie Hein is embarking on a cross-Canada cycle to raise awareness regarding the Father being stripped of
the family by the Family Court System. He is seeking fairness.

" I want my kids back, at least half the time. I want this law that removes children from their fathers - and fathers from their children -to change. I am cycling across Canada to raise awareness of this problem.

I need other fathers to know they are not alone. I want to unify the men and children abused by this Family Court System. It is important that the general public becomes aware of this problem. "


Arnie Hein

More:  Issues:  Hein, Arnie: "Cross My Heart" Equal Parenting Trek 2005;
Meetings:  Equal Parenting Trek 2005

McKenzie & Pedersen, the "Two Robs",
Equal Parenting Bike Trek US 2006, 2007...

Robb MacKenzie Equal Parenting Bike Trek - Google Search;
Robb MacKenzie Equal Parenting Bike Trek - Google Video

Rob Pederson, Equal Parenting - Google Search;
Robert Pederson, Equal Parenting - Google Video

Cycling4Children.com Equal Parenting Bike Trek's photostream

More:  Issues:  McKenzie & Pedersen, the "Two Robs", Equal Parenting Bike Trek US 2006, 2007...;
Issues:  Smith, Ron:  DC Family Preservation Rally, Compulsory Drugging of Children;
Issues:  Compulsory Drugging of Children, Thymerisol;

Liberal Irwin Cotler:  "Natural Parents have NO RIGHTS"

Irwin Cotler, former Liberal "Justice" Minister robbed Canadians of their NATURAL PARENTS' Rights

Irwin Cotler - Google Search;
Irwin Cotler - Google Video

"Natural Parents have NO RIGHTS....  ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....

"Natural Parents' Rights now  gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"

16.10 Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to conform to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal BREACH OF TRUST"

FYI, the ideas that the State assigngs Rights & Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from pre-war Nazi Germany.   Under the British system rights are not State-given, but God Given.

Buying into the Court's position that what rights remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same position that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.

More:  News:  Cotler, Irwin:  "Natural Parents have NO RIGHTS...;
News:  European Union;
Issues:  Paul Watson:  Nazi Origins of European Union;;;
Issues: G. Edward  Griffin ;
Issues: Fabian Socialism;

Allan Rock, Liberal:



Imprisonment  & Removal of Drivers' Licenses, Passports for Non-Payment of Imputed FMEP Debts, UN's Agenda 21 Implementation, Termination of Free Speech

Allan rock, liberal - Google Search;
Allan rock, liberal - Google Search


More:  News:  Rock, Allan, Liberal:  Imprisonment  & Removal of Drivers' Licenses, Passports for Non-Payment of FMEP Debts;
News:  Houle, Francois / University of Ottawa:  Canada's Speech Crime Laws
Issues:  Coulter, Ann:  Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Assembly;
Issues:  Paul, Ron;
Issues:  "Hate Crime" Thought Police, Tyranny of Human Rights Tribunals;
News:  Robinson,
Svend  NDP MP, Lawyer & Thief for "Hate Crimes" Legislation;
Issues:  "Special Prosecutors"  for Lawyers & Judges;

Bill Graham, Pedophile Parliamentarian & Defense Minister


Bill Graham, mp - Google Search;
Bill Graham, mp - Google Video

Lawrence Metherel - Google Search

2007-06-19  Liberal MP Bill Graham announces resignation

"In spite of credible revelations dating back to April 2002 about Bill Graham, a sex addicted bi-sexual sodomizing a 15 year old male prostitute named Lawrence Metherel, Paul Martin allowed Graham to remain Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister - and eventually named him to the portfolio of Minister of Defense.

"On Sept. 28/2005 a vote was held in Parliament to raise the age of consent from 14 (one of the lowest age of consents in the world) to 16 (an age which many still consider too low).

"Bill Graham, Paul Martin, and Anne McLellan, on Sept. 28th, voted against raising the age of consent to 16

More:  News:  Graham, Bill:  Pedophile Parliamentarian, Defense Minister

Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges and Legal Oligarchy

Chapter VII. The English Common Law. Section 57. The Norman Conquest

A beautiy of British  Common Law is that it is STATIC, and NOT DYNAMIC as these Activist Judges would have you think.

Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and they will likely tell you it is "Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say "Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these days"

This is completely FALSE.  The Judges are Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever.  Since 1649, only PARLIAMENT has the Capacity to make Law.

British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was only observed and documented by individuals sent out by the newly Norman Crown after the Norman Conquest of 1066  to observe and codify the laws and customs of the various peoples of Britain..  This was done with a view to aggregate existing customs which may vary across the land,  into a unified body of Laws.  The Authority quoted by the Commoners in their administration of Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the Bible and principles of Danelaw

The process of documentation took only a couple of hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body of Law which was historical, popular, and has served in the intervening centuries as a Benchmark against which Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".  It does NOT change.

More:   Issues:  Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges and Legal Oligarchy;
Issues:  "Judicial Interpretation" to pervert Statutes of Parliament;
Issues:  Judicial Activism is Breach of Trust;
Issues:  Judicial Globalization is Treason

Debtor's Prison, abolished in 1869 in the UK, reinstituted to appease "Femi-Nazis"

Debtor's Prison - Google Search;
Debtors Prison - Google Video;
Debtors Prison abolished - Google Search

The common practice in BC Courts when Fathers do not pay Child Support - which most of the time is merely Imputed - is to send non-paying Father to Prison until he or his family members pay the fees imposed by the Judge. 

1869-xx-xx Debtors Act 1869 (c.62), United Kingdom

Even when mothers agree that Child Support should no longer be paid, we find that the Family Enforcement agencies, which are private contractors functioning as Bounty Hunters, typically refuse to end their claim on the father's income,.

More:  Issues:  Debtors's Prison Reinstituted;
Issues:  Passports Removed to Appease Femi-Nazis;
Issues:  Driver's Licenses removed to appease "Femi-Nazis";
Testimonials:  Jeffery, Hal & Danica;
Issues:  Imputed income;
Issues:  Child Support Fraud;

Barbara Kay, National Post

Barbara Kay - Google Search;
Barbara Kay - Google Video

"In Ontario alone, the names Cornwall, Prescott, and London became synonymous with "respectable" pedophile rings -- lawyers, doctors, police officers and Catholic clergymen -- that for decades preyed on society's most vulnerable boys."

;

2007-09-26 Forgetting the male victims of child abuse, Barbara Kay

2006-06-14  Welcome to the matriarchy, Barbara Kay;


More.... Issues:  Barbara Kay,  National Post;
Testimonials:  Prior, Byron: Sexual Abuse;
News:  Mount Cashel Orphanage, St. John's NL;
Issues:  Boys Of St. Vincent <Mount Cashel, NL>
News: Southin, Mary: BC Judge backs Pedophilia, Solicitation of Children for Sexual Activities;
News:  Ramsay, Judge David BC Judge & Pedophile
News:  Orr, Judge David:  Protection of Pedophiles in Public Service;
News:  Hickman, T. Alex, NL Judge, alleged Pedophile & Town Tyrant
Testimonials:   Earle, Shane: Mount Cashel Orphange, NL;
Testimonials: Samson, Pierre:  Duplessis Orphans, QU
News:  Duplessis Orphans:  Nazi Experiments Orphange, NL
Issues: Child Trafficking by Public Officers & Judges;
Issues:  Judicial Freemasonry
Issues:  Judicial Interpretation;
News:  Crowley, Aleister:  Luciferian Freemasonry, Homosexual Pedophilia & Pederasty;

 Philip Mayfield, Cariboo - Chilcotin

We also wish to thank retired MP Philip Mayfeild,  Cariboo - Childotin for his work in the Joint Committee.

Recovered pages of EPG website

equalparenting.net

Rights of fathers Ignored?
Both Parents Vita, Lynn Bentz
Broken Homes Mean Bleak Future
Fatherneed
Perception vs Reality
"For the Sake of the Children"
Some Facts on Families



Fathers for Life


Yahoo Groups





Click here to join equalparenting-bc













































KRights Radio!











Fathers for Life






Equal Parenting Trek - US:  Equal Parenting Roundups from Seattle & LA to Washington DC

Yahoo Groups





Click here to join equalparenting-bc

MeetUp Groups









Beware of the "Parental Rights" IMPOSTER!!!! 
"Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights"


Beware of the IMPOSTER!!!! 
"Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights"

It comes as a big surprise to us that the majority of Canadian groups that present themselves as "Parents Rights" groups  do NOT subscribe our position that it is the NATURAL PARENT who's rights are being robbed, making Family Courts an over-the-counter Child Trafficking business .  Perhaps this will surprise you also. Perhaps you too, have been duped.

It appears to be normal in Canada, that  that what calls itself a "Parent's Rights" group - at least those with funding and prominence - is being run from the perspective of Homosexual Activists and Step Parents wishing to displace Natural Parents.  They insist that ALL the classes of "parents", be they Homosexual Lovers of a Natural Parent, Step-Parents, Legal Parents, Foster Parents and so on must be given equal status in Law with Natural Parents, and what Statutory Amendments must must reflect a "modern" view of the Family which is "Community" or "Constellation" rather than "Nuclear" family consisting of a Natural Father and Mother living together or apart.  They are EXTREMELY hostile to our view that  it is the NATURAL PARENT that is being robbed of their historic and Common Law rights to be the Custodians of their Natural Children until they attain an Age of Majority. 

They are EXTREMELY insistent that attention NOT be brought to the ELIMINATION of Natural Parents' Rights in the Canadian Homosexual Marriage legislation.  We know of no major "Father's Rights" group in Canada which is not scrutinized and actively censures it's Member by those defending Homosexual displacement of Natural Parents.  At Meetings they harangue, mock and overtalk you.  In blogs and Yahoo groups they expel you.  Some join Canadian  Gay Parades where children are painted up, cross-dressed, and forced to accept public nudity, homosexual sex acts public demonstrations of sex acts, flagrant law-breaking and Cross-Dressing as their lifestyle.  Recall at least 40% and maybe 50% of Judges are Homosexual.  and that promoting Homosexuality has been identified as a vehicle to reduce World Population by the Club of Rome and the Rockefellers. for at least forty years.

More:  About:  Beware of the IMPOSTER!!!!  "Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights";
News:  Lessard, Hester - Heterosexual view of Parenthood must be ignored
News:  Smith, Judge Daphne, BCSC, for Child Trafficking;
Issues:  Trociuk, Darrell;
Issues:  Child Trafficking, Canadian;
Testimonials:  Rick Fredrickson of Saskatoon

My Experience with "Mens Groups" in Vancouver, BC

This echoes this writers' experience in the first years of Separation.  I was told by the Social Services "Helpline" to go to certain "Men's Groups" - these groups were funded for this purpose - and they gave me a list of groups to attend..  I did.  I couldn't understand why nobody there had children or understand my anxiety over not knowing where my children were, where my wife was, etc..  Their concerns always seems to revolve around my sexual activity - or lack thereof - insisting it was "unhealthy" that I hadn't had sex for <some time>. 

Over the months, they kept wanting me to go to dinner with them to "relax" and go camping with them where we would go into a Sweat Lodge, oil each other down and "Beat our Drums",.   I said "No Thank you", and kept coming back hoping to find a Dad who could help me out with Family Court.   As I recall no Dad showed up at that group.

After a couple of months or so, a trio of total Flamers started showing up, which I tried to ignore.  During the Meeting the "regular" guys told me again how important for "Men's Health" that I have sex.  They nodded at the "Flamers" saying they were available to do the dirty deed, that they really liked doing it, and told me I should just close my eyes and imagine it was a woman.  I would feel a lot better afterwards, they said. 

After a few Meetings with me trying to brush them off, they got pretty aggressive with me, and demanded an answer as to why I would care whether it was a man or a woman?  I was there for help with my family problems on the advise of the "Helpline" and all these guys cared about was my 'sexual health' and putting me on the defensive about why I wouldn't accept the oral services they were offering!!!  

I never went back there again.  I went to another group on the List.  The second group the "Leader" made a point of introducing himself as a Homosexual, which I tried to ignore.  He was a very nice fellow, but completely incapable of being any assistance on Family Court .  He told us his Story.... that he was raised without a father, and that he was desperately lonely alone in the house while his mother worked.  At five, his only friend it seemed was a man in the neighborhood who spent time with him, comforted him while he lay face down on the floor by  by stroking his legs.  In time he was seduced into a homosexual relationship.  All the while, his mother was too busy to know what was going on at home while she was at work.  He was careful to point out, though his first sexual experience being with the neighborhood pedophile this had nothing to do with his being Homosexual.  He claimed he was "born" a Homosexual.

I didn't have the heart to tell him there had just been a study released that had interviewed thousands of homosexuals and asked  them  hundreds of questions seeking the factors that that correlated with homosexuality.  The MOST HIGHLY CORRELATED FACTOR WAS "RAISED WITHOUT A FATHER". 

Other studies, BTW, have shown that "Last Born Male". is highly correlated with homosexuality.  Both of these stats tell you that genetics hasn't a lot to do with homosexual origins.

Eventually I quit that group and went to another on the List.....  which also seemed pretty fruity with the oil, the sweat lodges, etc, so I went to yet another.  Same old stuff there, too.

At this  point I quit going to "Men's groups"

Many years later, I was told to go to a government funded private office for "Counseling" during the years of my having been put onto "Supervised Access" because I had caught my child's teacher shoving him onto the school floor and then darting away when she saw me entering the room.  I had foolishly gone to the School Board to report her.  The School Board's response was to have an Order of Supervised Access made out in which a Condition of us seeing each other was that neither of us could "speak negatively" of the teacher whom I witnessed shoving him onto the ground, and whom he said had been doing this for months, but he had been forbidden to say anything about it to me.  He was still very compliant on those days but fortunately he learned to rebel over the course of the Supervision.

The Bulletin Board of the government funded private office was packed with pamphlets and notices on STDs, Homosexuality, "Coming Out", Abortion rights, and of course loads of pamphlets about "Living in an Abuse Relationship" with a man which ultimately will lead to Male Violence.  Curiously there were plenty of pamphlets too about Lesbians Battering Women, addressing the bizarrely high rate of violence and murder in homosexual pairs I had never guessed at until a criminal lawyer tipped me off..  

In due time, I made regular complaints there about the Bulletin Board, that they had no programs or Meeting Space for NCP Dads.  (I was hoping we could have  Meeting there, and described what we might do.) Some months later the bulletin board was stripped, and I was told they were starting a "Dad's" group,  which they thought I should attend, and I should round up the Dads and bring them along.

Wouldn't you know it, they rejected the Volunteer model, I suggested, and had HIRED a couple of guys to run the program.  One was an openly gay bottom, and the other who was at least a very aggressive domineering Homophile.  You have to wonder why the government jobs keep going to these guys.  Our guess after going to a Courthouse with a lawyer friend and seeing how things work down there, we have coined the phrase "Sexual Nepotism".to explain the rather obvious power base taking over many government offices.

We were expected to recite with the Leader a Prayer to a strange "earth goddess" type of Deity at the end of the Meetings - an obviously New Age perv-Version of a Recovery Group's "God, grant me the Serenity ...." prayer.

More:  About:  Beware of the IMPOSTER!!!!  "Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights";
News:  Lessard, Hester - Heterosexual view of Parenthood must be ignored
News:  Smith, Judge Daphne, BCSC, for Child Trafficking;
Issues:  Trociuk, Darrell;
Issues:  Child Trafficking, Canadian;
Testimonials:  Rick Fredrickson of Saskatoon

Constance Cumbey:  New Age Nazism

CONSTANCE CUMBEY: DISCOVERING THE NEW AGE MOVEMENT

More:  Issues:  Cumbey, Constance :  New Age Nazism;
Issues:  Monteith, Dr. Stanley: Tax Exempt Foundations
Issues:  Riplinger, Gail: Luciferian / New Age Bibles
;
News:  Helena Blavatsky (1831–1891), Lesbian Founder of Theosophical Society & Godmother of New Age Movement;
News:  Georgia Guide Stones: Global De-Population;
News:  Lucis Trust;
News:  Strong, Maurice;
News:  Club of Rome:  Ten Regions & Global Warming Fraud

Attributing "Parental Rights"  to anyone other than a Natural Parent thieves children from their Natural Parents.

This position, which is so common - that ALL varieties of a "Parent" must be treated equally - is inherently HOSTILE to the rights of a NATURAL PARENT and their NATURAL CHILD.  To our knowledge what government funding exists goes to groups that press for the rights of the "LEGAL PARENT" and by nature sidelines the interests of the NATURAL PARENT

Just think about that for a second.  Who is it that decides who the "Legal Parent" is?  It is the  Courts.  And who is it that is running the Courts, since the Courts refuse to conform to the Supremacy of Parliament?

When you fund a "Parents" group you would be well advised to make sure you are not funding the Natural Enemy of Natural Parents, the Court appointed "LEGAL PARENT" and are in fact funding a group that seeks to defeat the rights of a NATURAL PARENT  in favor of a Step-Parent, a Legal Parent, a Homosexual Lover of a Natural Parent, or a Foster Parent

More:  Issues:  Poofy Judges
Issues:  Lively, Scott:  "Pink Swastika", Homosexuality and the Nazi Party;
Issues:  Lynette Burrows, Psychologist warns on Pedophiles
Issues:  Homosexual Activism;
Issues:  Judicial Activism;

CHILDREN need BOTH NATURAL PARENTS and ALL NATURAL GRAND-PARENTS!

Repeal Activist-imposed Homosexual Marriage Legislation and
Restore the right of NATURAL PARENTS to their own children!

"Granting gay couples the right to have children by definition means giving at least one of the partners the right to have someone else's children, and the question arises whether the original parent or parents ever agreed to part with them or committed some transgression to warrant losing them. Current law governing divorce, domestic violence, and child abuse render this question open. ... gay marriages and gay adoption ..  ensued once government officials got into the business .. of distributing other people's children."

"War Against The Family".mp3

The Charter makes NO reference to sexual orientation

Parenting Rights MUST be assigned EQUALLY to both male and female  NATURAL PARENTS. 

The rights of Natural   Parents must be RESTORED  

Parliament must

AXE ACTIVIST JUDGES!!!

Feminism, Socialism, and Communism are one in the same, Catharine A. MacKinnon;

 

 

More:  Issues:  Baskerville, Dr. Stephen;
Axe_Activist_Judges!:
Fabian Socialism
Gay Rights Strategies Involve Conscious Deception And Wholesale Manipulation of Public Opinion;

Two Kinds of "Equal Parenting"

There are two kinds of "Equal Parenting" groups:

There are those like us who confine their arguments for Equal Parenting to Natural Parents only, and for the Natural Grandparents. who in the Natural Parent's absence must be be permitted to stand as an Equal Parent against the present Natural Parent..  We say:"Without CAUSE or CONSENT no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent."  

To our amazement we find that the majority of "Parenting Rights" groups with which we are familiar REFUSE to confine their arguments for primacy of Parental Rights to NATURAL PARENTS,   We think that for the average hearer, this is deceptive and a fraud.  They average person, we think, will assume that "Equal Parenting" refers to the two Natural Parents only.

Most "Equal Parenting": groups when we press them on the Natural Parents' question eventually take the position that "there are MANY classes of people NOT related by blood to the Child whose "rights" are being infringed upon when they are not awarded "Equal Parenting" rights with the Natural Parents.  

They often claim that by spending time with a Child, one can accrue Parental Rights.  We REJECT this completely.

They say that by developing a social relationship with a Natural Parents or a Child, basically any adult living in the same household as the Child can accrue Parental Rights which must be "respected"

Oddly only the man the mother claims is the father is required to pay Child Support and pay the living expenses of these Interlopers.. 

FYI the custom of the Courts is that an unmarried man accused of fathering a Child cannot require a Paternity Test, before having his wages gleaned.  Again False Accusations with Impunity for women are fully supported by these "Femi-Nazi" courts.. 

Neither will a Natural  father  be granted an Adoption Veto thanks to BC Judge Daphne Smith!!! Fathers are now being required to bay Child Support to Adoptive Parents to whom he has lost a Custody Battle.   

We think it's blatantly obvious that you can't ascribe Parental Rights to anyone but the two Natural Parents (or the Natural Grandparents & Natural Siblings in their absence)  without treating Human Beings like cattle whose children are a commodity you  can sell for profit into the lucrative Child Trafficking market.  We reject their assertion a person other than the two Natural Parents have Parental Rights upon the conception of any Child. and that these rights are strengthened the longer the Natural Parent is kept from their child.

The Courts and Lawyers will love the confusion they've brought to this simple  question by giving  "Equal Parenting" to Step Parents and Lesbian Lovers  of a Natural Parent.

Beware of the "Parental Rights" IMPOSTER!!!!

"Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights"

Be on the lookout for the "Parent's Rights" IMPOSTER.  Insist on "Natural Parents Only", please!

It comes as a big surprise to us that many groups that present themselves as "Parents Rights" groups  REFUSE to defend the  NATURAL PARENT, and  and to demand RESTORATION of Natural Parents Rights taken from Canadians in the Homosexual Marriage legislation.

Instead their position to promote the "rights" of  a "Parent" in the widest sense of the word, making NO distinction  between NATURAL PARENTS and wannaabe Legal Parents.  They have bowed to University of Victoria's  assertion that  the SCC's Trociuk Decision "endorses a Heterosexual View of the Family and must be ignored", legitimizing the ongoing Child Trafficking by the State which views Canadian children as State Property and merchandise for  sale in the lucrative Child Adoption Market  They refuse to be hampered by prior obligations to that pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can Veto an Adoption.


It appears that many "Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United Nations and Liberal Irwin Cotler's assertion that the Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent has "NO RIGHTS", making the State, not the Natural Parents the Protector of the Child..

Without Cause or Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!

More:  About:  Beware of the IMPOSTER!!!!  "Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights";
News:  Lessard, Hester - Heterosexual view of Parenthood must be ignored
News:  Smith, Judge Daphne, BCSC, for Child Trafficking;
Issues:  Trociuk, Darrell;
Issues:  Child Trafficking, Canadian;
Testimonials:  Rick Fredrickson of Saskatoon

Liberal Irwin Cotler:  "Natural Parents have NO RIGHTS"

Irwin Cotler, former Liberal "Justice" Minister robbed Canadians of their NATURAL PARENTS' Rights

Irwin Cotler - Google Search;
Irwin Cotler - Google Video

"Natural Parents have NO RIGHTS....  ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....

"Natural Parents' Rights now  gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"

16.10 Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to conform to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal BREACH OF TRUST"

FYI, the ideas that the State assigns Rights & Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from pre-war Nazi Germany.   Under the British system rights are not State-given, but God Given.

Buying into the Court's position that what rights remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same position that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.

More:  News:  Cotler, Irwin:  "Natural Parents have NO RIGHTS...;
News:  European Union;
Issues:  Paul Watson:  Nazi Origins of European Union;;;
Issues: G. Edward  Griffin ;
Issues: Fabian Socialism;

Scott Lively,
"Pink Swastika"

Homosexuality and the Nazi Party

Scott Lively - Google Search
Scott Lively - Google Videos

:... many leaders in the German Nazi regime, including Adolf Hitler himself, were homosexual .. eight of the top ten serial killers in the US were homosexuals."

book_1995-LIVELY-pink-swastika.pdf.zip




More:  Issues:  Lively, Scott:  "Pink Swastika", Homosexuality and the Nazi Party;
Issues:  Lynette Burrows, Psychologist warns on Pedophiles
Issues:  Homosexual Activism;
Issues:  Judicial Activism;
Issues:  Poofy Judges
;
News:  Skull & Bones, 322, Yale;
Issues:  Sutton, Anhony C: Wall Street & the Rise of Hitler;
Issues:  Iserbyt, Charlotte: Dumbing Down
News:  Weishaupt, Adam:  Illuminati Founder;
;
Issues:  Dennis L. Cuddy, PhD;
 Issues:  Monteith, Dr. Stanley: Tax Exempt Foundations:

 Hester Lessard / University of Victoria: "Heterosexual View of Parenthood must be ignored"

Lessard, Hester - Google Search;
Lessard, Hester: UVic Faculty of Law

 "Trociuk is .. a disheartening endorsement of biological  concepts of parenthood  ... flawed .... it legitimizes a heterosexual view of the family.   ..   It must be ignored."

More: News:  Lessard, Hester - Heterosexual view of Parenthood must be ignored
News:  Smith, Judge Daphne, BCSC, for Child Trafficking;
Issues:  Trociuk, Darrell;
Issues:  Child Trafficking, Canadian;
Testimonials:  Rick Fredrickson of Saskatoon

Alfred Kinsey:  Rockefeller Research in Pedophilia & Falsified Reporting

Alfred Kinsey - Google Search;
Alfred Kinsey - Google Video

Sexual psychopath.  His 'data' mostly came from sexual psychopaths, sex offenders, criminals, paedophiles, male prostitutes, and promiscuous homosexuals.  Two of his "co-investigators" were serial rapists: Rex King, convicted of 800 counts of child rape involving both sexes, and Fritz von Balluseck, an ex-Nazi convicted of the rape-murder of a ten-year-old girl in Berlin

Kinsey solicited and encouraged pedophiles, at home and abroad, to sexually violate from 317 to 2,035 infants and children for his alleged data on normal "child sexuality."

Poofy Judges

2004-06-16  Gays, lesbians and the numbers game (1.0% Canadians gay, 0.7% Bi)

Lawyers consistently estimate the homosexual  fraction of the Law Societies & Judiciaries as "forty-something" percent.  That is, a randomly selected Judge or Lawyer is about thirty TIMES  more likely to be homosexual than the population at large

More:  Issues:  Poofy Judges
Issues:  Lively, Scott:  "Pink Swastika", Homosexuality and the Nazi Party;
Issues:  Lynette Burrows, Psychologist warns on Pedophiles
Issues:  Homosexual Activism;
Issues:  Judicial Activism;

Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges and Legal Oligarchy

Chapter VII. The English Common Law. Section 57. The Norman Conquest

A beautiy of British  Common Law is that it is STATIC, and NOT DYNAMIC as these Activist Judges would have you think.

Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and they will likely tell you it is "Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say "Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these days"

This is completely FALSE.  The Judges are Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever.  Since 1649, only PARLIAMENT has the Capacity to make Law.

British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was only observed and documented by individuals sent out by the newly Norman Crown after the Norman Conquest of 1066  to observe and codify the laws and customs of the various peoples of Britain..  This was done with a view to aggregate existing customs which may vary across the land,  into a unified body of Laws.  The Authority quoted by the Commoners in their administration of Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the Bible and principles of Danelaw

The process of documentation took only a couple of hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body of Law which was historical, popular, and has served in the intervening centuries as a Benchmark against which Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".  It does NOT change.

More:   Issues:  Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges and Legal Oligarchy;
Issues:  "Judicial Interpretation" to pervert Statutes of Parliament;
Issues:  Judicial Activism is Breach of Trust;
Issues:  Judicial Globalization is Treason

Equal Parenting How To's

Equal Parenting is like a Three Layer Cake. 

"Without Cause or Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!

"Two Equal Parents may .. agree to unequal Parenting Time, but this does NOT impugn the Parental Authority of either Natural Parent relative to Third Party Interlopers.

1.  The Bottom Layer:  The Initial Equal Parenting Agreement

Initial Equal Parenting Agreement creating full time, all time equality of both natural parents, subordinate to no third parties (a Constitutional right ignored by most Family Courts); a series of tentative Parenting Timetables for each year and statement of intent, or  "Wishes"; the requirement that the tentative Parenting Timetable laid out there will be reviewed and finalized annually and incorporated into the Annual Parenting Supplement.  Parental authority and discretion is always equal and unaffected by inequalities of Parenting Time allocations.

2.  Middle Layer:  The Annual Supplement & its Parenting Timetable

At-A-Glance® Erasable Yearly Vertical Jumbo Wall Calendar, 48" x 32", 2005Yearly Annual Parenting Supplements for planning the school year and finalizing the Parenting Timetable for the upcoming  parenting year.  Parenting Timetable must meet the test for equality established in 1) the initial Equal Parenting Agreement.

3.  Top Layer:  Autonomy of Both Equal Parents on all matters not previously Constrained.

Parenting Timetable alternates all residual parenting questions between the two otherwise equal parents who are subordinate to no third parties.  Full autonomy of each parent during their Parenting Time as allotted in the agreed Parenting Timetable on all residual parenting questions not previously constrained by Covenants in the initial Equal Parenting Agreement, or the current Annual Parenting Supplement.  Full discretion on residual parenting with the Timetabled Parent, but flexibility encouraged and provided by Ad Hoc Agreements.

4.  Icing on the Cake.....

Forget about the Courts, and your Ex, and go have fun with your kids!!!







More:  About:  Equal Parenting How To's:  Three Layer Cake;
About:  Grandparents in Equal Parenting;
About:  EPR = Equal Parenting Roundups;
About: EPT =  Equal Parenting Trek;
About:  EP Trek Generic Calendar:
Issues:  Kinship Families or Grandparents raising Children::


     
Copyright 2002  equalparenting-bc.ca 

 

       Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages  exercising democratic rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.