Beware of the "Parental Rights" IMPOSTER!!!!

"Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights"
Be on
the lookout for the "Parent's Rights" IMPOSTER. Insist on "Natural
Parents Only", please!
It comes as a big surprise to us that many groups
that present themselves as
"Parents Rights" groups REFUSE to defend the
NATURAL PARENT, and and to demand
RESTORATION of
Natural Parents Rights taken from Canadians in the
Homosexual Marriage
legislation.

Instead their position to promote the "rights" of
a "Parent" in the widest sense of the word, making NO distinction
between NATURAL PARENTS and wannaabe
Legal Parents. They have bowed to
University of Victoria's
assertion that the SCC's
Trociuk Decision
"endorses a
Heterosexual View of the Family and must be ignored",
legitimizing the ongoing
Child
Trafficking by the State which views
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in the
lucrative Child Adoption Market They
refuse to be hampered by prior obligations to that pesky Natural Parent
who thinks they can Veto
an Adoption.


It appears that many
"Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United Nations and
Liberal Irwin Cotler's
assertion that the
Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent has
"NO RIGHTS", making the
State, not the Natural Parents the
Protector of the Child..
Without
Cause or Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!
More: About:
Beware of the IMPOSTER!!!! "Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's
Rights";
News:
Lessard, Hester - Heterosexual view of Parenthood must be ignored
News: Smith, Judge
Daphne, BCSC, for Child Trafficking;
Issues: Trociuk,
Darrell;
Issues:
Child Trafficking, Canadian;
Testimonials:
Rick Fredrickson of Saskatoon |
Beware of the IMPOSTER!!!!
"Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights"
Be on
the lookout for the "Parent's Rights" IMPOSTER. Insist on "Natural
Parents" only, please!
It comes as a big surprise to us that many groups
that present themselves as "Parents Rights" groups do NOT
subscribe our position that it is the NATURAL
PARENT who's rights are being impinged upon.
Instead their position is to promote the "rights" of
a "Parent" in the widest sense of the word, and make NO distinction for
the rights of a NATURAL PARENT and a NATURAL CHILD to be with each
other.
More: About:
Beware of the IMPOSTER!!!! "Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's
Rights" |
|

Anne Cools - Google Search

Anne Cools' Website
Anne Cools
on False Accusations
EP Nemesis,
Liberal Hedy Fry, the Queen of FALSE ACCUSERS
"Honourable senators know that I have studied a terrible and pernicious
heart of darkness that has developed in our court system, being the use
of
FALSE ACCUSATIONS in civil justice.
This is
the mischief of litigating parties, usually mothers, suddenly within the
context of divorce and within child custody proceedings falsely accusing
the other party, usually fathers, of the sexual abuse of their own
children. ,,,
These
FALSE ALLEGATIONS are often made with the overt or covert complicity
of their lawyers. They are a lethal weapon in the business of parental
alienation. They are a tool for achieving sole custody of children and
creating fatherlessness."
More:
Issues: Cools,
Senator Anne |
|

We are also fortunate to have
Jay Hill, MP
(Prince George – Peace River) here in British Columbia.
“I’m
pushing for equality —both parents should have equal rights and equal
access to their child,”
Hill said. “The courts
seem to start from the premise that somehow fathers aren’t responsible
parents. But both parents are deemed good parents as long as the
marriage lasts; why are they not when the marriage ends?”
More:
Jay's site;
Iissues: Hill, MP Jay. |

We are fortunate in British Columbia to have a
number of pro-family parliamentarians. Of particular
prominence is Paul Forseth,
M.P. - member of the "For the Sake of the Children"
Committee, co-author of the
Dissenting Opinions, and a staunch advocate of pro-family
concerns. Paul has put in many years pushing to have Equal
Parenting issues brought forward to the Canadian Parliament, and
faced fierce opposition from the Prime Minister. Both
Paul and Senator Cools have pressed on to redeem fathers from groups
like the Status of Women (SOW) enduring multiple death
threats from various radical feminist groups while serving on the
Committee. These MPs are tough.
Monday Nov.7th 2005 Dear Equal
Parenting-BC: "Conservatives are committed to
Shared Parenting. The national party “Policy Declaration” that was
passed by delegates at our March 2005 Montreal convention says
clearly that: 65. Shared Parenting: A
Conservative Government will make the necessary changes to the
Divorce Act to ensure that in the event of a marital breakdown, the
Divorce Act will allow both parents and all grandparents to maintain
a meaningful relationship with their children and grandchildren,
unless it is clearly demonstrated not to be in the best interests of
the children.
My Liberal colleagues that served with me on
the Senate-Commons committee that wrote the “For
the Sake of the Children report, admitted that they have
little confidence that their Party will ever enact the needed
amendments to the Divorce Act, that completely fulfills the report
recommendations. The NDP opposed us during the Committee process,
and have never been supportive of dads.
Conservatives are the only hope for fairness
and reasonableness in Divorce and Family Law. I encourage those who
care, to focus their energy where it will help the most, by working
to elect as many Conservatives as possible. I hope that the many who
are frustrated, not become sidetracked into protest, which does
nothing during an election but undercut our ability to make good
things happen. The Liberals and the NDP will say anything in an
election to get a vote, but they will never deliver “shared
parenting”. Every vote that does not go to a Conservative in the
next election is a vote against “shared parenting”.
Paul Forseth MP |
|

Although not from British Columbia, and less familiar
to us, we cannot neglect to recognize the solid support of once Liberal
MP, Rodger Gallaway of
Sarnia. Gallaway and Cools were frequently photographed together
while championing the rights of children to both
NATURAL PARENTS. |
McKenzie & Pedersen, the "Two Robs",
Equal Parenting Bike Trek US 2006, 2007...

Robb MacKenzie Equal Parenting Bike Trek - Google Search;
Robb MacKenzie Equal Parenting Bike Trek - Google Video

Rob Pederson, Equal Parenting - Google Search;
Robert Pederson, Equal Parenting - Google Video

Cycling4Children.com Equal Parenting Bike Trek's photostream
More:
Issues:
McKenzie & Pedersen, the "Two Robs", Equal Parenting Bike Trek US 2006,
2007...;
Issues: Smith,
Ron: DC Family Preservation Rally, Compulsory Drugging of
Children;
Issues:
Compulsory Drugging of Children, Thymerisol; |
Bill Graham, Pedophile Parliamentarian & Defense Minister


Bill Graham, mp - Google Search;
Bill Graham, mp - Google Video
Lawrence Metherel - Google Search
2007-06-19 Liberal MP Bill Graham announces resignation
"In spite of credible revelations dating back to
April 2002 about Bill Graham, a sex addicted bi-sexual sodomizing a 15
year old male prostitute named
Lawrence Metherel, Paul Martin
allowed Graham to remain
Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister - and eventually named him to the
portfolio of Minister of Defense.
"On Sept. 28/2005 a vote was held in Parliament to raise the age of
consent from 14 (one of the lowest age of consents in the world) to 16
(an age which many still consider too low).
"Bill Graham, Paul Martin, and Anne McLellan, on
Sept. 28th, voted against raising the age of consent to 16


More: News:
Graham, Bill: Pedophile Parliamentarian, Defense Minister |
Barbara Kay, National Post

Barbara Kay - Google Search;
Barbara Kay - Google Video
"In
Ontario alone, the names
Cornwall, Prescott, and London became synonymous with "respectable"
pedophile rings -- lawyers, doctors, police officers and Catholic
clergymen -- that for decades preyed on society's most vulnerable boys."
2008-04-22 We're
still ignoring abused straight men, Barbara Kay;
2007-09-26 Forgetting the male victims of child abuse, Barbara Kay
2006-06-14 Welcome to the matriarchy, Barbara Kay;


More....
Issues: Barbara Kay, National Post;
Testimonials: Prior, Byron: Sexual Abuse;
News: Mount Cashel
Orphanage, St. John's NL;
Issues: Boys Of St.
Vincent <Mount Cashel, NL>
News: Southin, Mary: BC Judge
backs Pedophilia, Solicitation of Children for Sexual Activities;
News: Ramsay, Judge David
BC Judge & Pedophile
News: Orr, Judge David:
Protection of Pedophiles in Public Service;
News: Hickman, T. Alex,
NL Judge, alleged Pedophile & Town Tyrant
Testimonials:
Earle, Shane: Mount Cashel Orphange, NL;
Testimonials: Samson,
Pierre: Duplessis Orphans, QU
News: Duplessis
Orphans: Nazi Experiments
Orphange, NL
Issues: Child Trafficking
by Public Officers & Judges;
Issues: Judicial
Freemasonry
Issues: Judicial
Interpretation;
News:
Crowley, Aleister: Luciferian Freemasonry, Homosexual Pedophilia &
Pederasty; |
| |
Equal Parenting as a Consent Agreement after Divorce
|
|
The more decisions that can be settled in the
Equal Parenting Agreement, the less trouble and expense later in
rehashing these same topics every year in the Annual Parenting Supplement. All these settled joint decisions are set
down in the legally binding "Covenants Section" of the Equal
Parenting Agreement.
The Supremacy and Legal Equality of Both Natural Parents
Any "Equal Parenting Agreement" must establish
the legal equality of both parents. This is already guaranteed under in
the Charter of
Rights and Freedoms (Sections 15.1 & 28). Neither parent’s
authority is subjugated to any third party: This is very easy to
do conceptually.
The problem as always are the ubiquitous femiinarcissist
"Women's right to Choose" types. For these it is second nature to demand
the woman's prerogative and right to murder unborn children with impunity at
taxpayers expense, the right to murder their husbands and young children
demanding the greatest sympathies and leniencies of the Courts, and to
"murder" their husbands and older children emotionally and financially in Family
Court. Stay clear of these ubiquitous femiinarcissists. Do not
be seduced by them. They mean you and family members no good.
Their intent is for your harm, and once injured, to give them greater access to
emotionally vulnerable women and their children. Tales of seduction and
sexual harassment in Women's Shelters abound. All these, if in government
service, are in Breach of
trust by public officer
To cover their tracks, and those of their kind, femiinarcissist
"Activist Judges" have by MIS-interpretation of the Charter fabricated the
fictitious "Charter Rights" of "sexual orientations" while ignoring generally
the true Charter Rights of Fathers and their Sons to equality on the basis of
"sex" literally prescribed TWICE in the Charter.)
Long Term Planning for Parenting, entrenched as Covenants
Anticipate all the joint decisions that have to be made in
parenting until the end of high school, and arrange them into functional
periods according to chronology. For example, plan separately the
pre-school, elementary school, middle school, high school periods of Parenting.
The objective is to develop an exhaustive list, which is to hashed over
until a consensus is reached. What can be agreed upon is entrenched into
the Agreement as Covenants.
Determine to lay down enough of a backbone of Covenants, so
that future efforts will be directed at day to day matters, rather than
foundational issues, like custody and guardianship - all easy money for the
legal profession, but lousy for families. What cannot be determined in
advance, and laid down in Covenants may be deferred to Annual Agreements to
supplement the initial Equal Parenting Agreement.
If at all possible, determine the "Parenting Community"
for each period, and lay that out in either the Covenants or Wishes section..
Parental "Wishes" Section
In addition to a "Covenants Section" of
the Agreement which IS binding, you can make a non-binding statement of
intent in a
"Wishes Section" to guide any person caring for the child in absence of
both parents. Set you mind to the prospect of "dying" and you are having
to set out your wishes to whoever is caring for you children after your "death".
For decent parents, this should be an easy and collaborative part, and provides
momentum for more difficult questions.
This might be the place to begin the Agreement making
process. It fits in well with the death of the marriage, and some of the
grieving that entails.
Although not strictly binding, the Wishes Section
provides any non-parent providing care, or making decisions on behalf of the
child in the absence of the parents a description of the Trust placed in
them. This is also the measure by which any such non-parent is to be
judged to be in breach of the Trust placed in them by lending them
parental powers in trust.
Short-Term Planning Parenting Supplements, "Annual
Agreements"
An ESSENTIAL Covenant of the Equal Parenting Agreement
is that Annual Parenting Supplement WILL be made yearly.
It is prudent to include in the initial Equal Parenting
Agreement what would normally be considered Annual Agreement material, to
provide a preexisting agreement to fall back on if one of the parents refuses to
participate in the preparation of an Annual Agreement in the future.
Embedded with in the initial Agreement and each Annual
Supplement is a "Parenting Timetable" to govern which parent has
autonomy on all residual day to day parenting issues on each calendar day in the
year in questions
Parenting Timetable:
The "Timetable" plans a one year calendar of
parenting alternation, encompassing all 52 weeks of school weeks and non-school
weeks. The Timetabled Parent is the parent obligated to provide care for
the child and given the right to decide how care not already determined in the
various covenants will be implemented.
It is desirable for the parenting split ratio between parents
to be close to 50% for many reasons. If the parents both live within driving
distance to the child's school, it is difficult to imagine why this would not be
possible.
Remember, what alternates in the Timetable is the
OBLIGATION to provide care and the RIGHT to make a parental decisions not
already established in the Covenants. Usually the right and obligation of
care is concurrent with physical care, but not necessarily.
If for some reason the Timetabled Parent cannot be
physically present with the child during their Timetabled time, we think it is
preferable to leave small children especially in the care of the Non-Timetabled
Parent than any third party. Under an Equal Parenting Agreement this
should not become contentious issue. The
Time-tabled Parent retains the obligation to provide care, and the right
to decide how that care will be implemented (subject to the Covenants and
Wishes), even while the child is in the care of the Non-Timetabled Parent.
The Non-Timetabled Parent of course in not under
obligation to provide care at such time, but if they are willing, the Timetabled
parent may assign care to the Non-Timetabled Parent..
|
|
Each spring, in anticipation of the coming school year, the
Equal Parenting Agreement requires a list of specific parenting decisions
be reviewed, modified if necessary, and recorded in the Annual Parenting Supplement.
The usual topics to be reviewed are schooling, day care, extra-curricular
activities, medical, health, how to pay for things, and so forth.
This is typically very simple and straight forward. Any
married couple would have to do the same thing yearly. The Annual
Agreements, often in tabular form, are written down and formalized in writing.
If for some catastrophic reason, preparation of these Annual
Agreements become problematic, they may be settled by Mediation or Binding
Arbitration predicated on the equality of the parents and all constraining
Covenants and guiding Wishes made in the initial Equal Parenting Agreement..
We tend to place a high value on maintaining a single
community for both parents, the settling stability of weekly routine, and
flexible predictability. Parents who move away move away without
their kids until alternative arrangements are made.
|
|
Embedded within the initial Equal Parenting Agreement and
each Annual Supplemental Agreement is a refreshed "Parenting-Time
Timetable". On any given day, one parent is the Timetabled Parent,
and the other parent is the
Non-Timetabled Parent. Neither parent’s authority is subjugated to any
third party, and they themselves are of equal status, with alternating parental
care and control.
Set down in each Agreement, specific dates and times which
predetermine which parent exercises parental control on any given date in the
Calendar Year. This constitutes the "Parenting-Time" Timetable.
Ideally you will have tentative Parenting-Time Timetables planned out from
Divorce through until the children reach the age of consent, which will be
tweaked and ratified in each Annual Parenting Supplement..
Registering the Equal Parenting Agreement and it's Annual Supplements in
Provincial Court means its terms can be amended without the chronic
involvement of lawyers or their additional cost to the raising of a child.
With in a calendar year there are ? weeks of Summer
Vacation, ? weeks of Standard School Weeks, and within the school
term, ? weeks of School Vacation. We recommend these all be divided
as equally between the parents as practicable. With Equal Parenting both
parents have equal rights to parenting time, but may waive these rights
for practical considerations. Equal Parenting rights are guaranteed under
the Charter, but rarely complied with in Family Court.
By adhering to this ESSENTIAL principle of INDEPENDENCE on
day to day parenting concerns not jointly established in the Covenants and
Wishes sections of the Agreements, disagreement which are bound to occur between
parents on day to day parenting are eliminated. This independence does not
permit a cantankerous parent, usually the mother, to escalate problems
with Joint Custody into a false claim sole custody predicated on the disruptions
she herself created. Traditionally, because of the most favored
status of women in BC Family Courts, Mothers gain by being disruptive, while
Fathers can only loose if they can't keep things on a steady keel with the
mother.
|
|
Just think of all the money your family will save by heading
directly into an Equal Parenting Agreement!
By the way, studies have clearly shown that the old sixties
thinking that conflict is harmful to kids is WRONG! Conflict in
marriage is not an excuse to end the "commitment" provided in marriage for your
spouse and your children. On the contrary, it is not CONFLICT that harms
kids, it is protracted, UNRESOLVED CONFLICT, such as that inflicted on us after
Divorce by the Family Law Industry, that creates the damage to our kids.
Conflict is inevitable where freewill exists, within
Marriage, and after Divorce. In fact, CONFLICT DEMONSTRATING PROBLEM
SOLVING and CONSENSUS BUILDING between equal partners is a necessary
and highly beneficial environment for kids to be raised in , and
far superior to the autocratic tyranny of a Sole Custodial Parent.
What needs to be avoided is the long term, UNRESOLVED conflict, the current
practice of the Family Law Industry creates. Long term, unresolved
conflict is a problem while the opportunity exists for one of the parents,
typically the mother determines to be uncooperative or disruptive. Many,
if not most BC judges allow women to be disruptive and make false
allegations in their bid for sole custody, even though they are instructed
in the Divorce Act to remove the disruptive parent from the class of custodial
parents.
You can save all that money the lawyers will charge you to
mess up your family their way, and have fun with your kids to put some icing on
your cake instead. Minimize the lawyers, and lather on the Icing!
|
|
Equal Parenting as a Consent Agreement after Divorce
|
|
|