Guy Fawkes thumbnail

Remember, Remember the 5th of November,
The gunpowder treason and plot, I see no reason why Gunpowder Treason
should ever be forgot

    ● EP-BC Home About  Issues   News  Testimonials  Reference   Fun Stuff Members


About Area Home

Families-4-Justice & Fathers-4-Justice
SOS = Spouses of Survivors, PIH
Beware of the IMPOSTER!!!!
Contact Us at Equal Parenting-BC
Equal Parenting How To's
Grandparents in Equal Parenting
Equal Parenting Q & A
Equal Parenting as Consent Agreement
Equal Parenting as a Living Will
EPA = Equal Parenting Anonymous
EPA Meeting Formats
EPR = Equal Parenting Roundups
EPR March, How To
EPT = Equal Parenting Trek
Equal Parenting Trek Calendar

Equal Parenting How To's

Equal Parenting is like a Three Layer Cake. 

"Without Cause or Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!

"Two Equal Parents may .. agree to unequal Parenting Time, but this does NOT impugn the Parental Authority of either Natural Parent relative to Third Party Interlopers.

1.  The Bottom Layer:  The Initial Equal Parenting Agreement

Initial Equal Parenting Agreement creating full time, all time equality of both natural parents, subordinate to no third parties (a Constitutional right ignored by most Family Courts); a series of tentative Parenting Timetables for each year and statement of intent, or  "Wishes"; the requirement that the tentative Parenting Timetable laid out there will be reviewed and finalized annually and incorporated into the Annual Parenting Supplement.  Parental authority and discretion is always equal and unaffected by inequalities of Parenting Time allocations.

2.  Middle Layer:  The Annual Supplement & its Parenting Timetable

At-A-Glance® Erasable Yearly Vertical Jumbo Wall Calendar, 48" x 32", 2005Yearly Annual Parenting Supplements for planning the school year and finalizing the Parenting Timetable for the upcoming  parenting year.  Parenting Timetable must meet the test for equality established in 1) the initial Equal Parenting Agreement.

3.  Top Layer:  Autonomy of Both Equal Parents on all matters not previously Constrained.

Parenting Timetable alternates all residual parenting questions between the two otherwise equal parents who are subordinate to no third parties.  Full autonomy of each parent during their Parenting Time as allotted in the agreed Parenting Timetable on all residual parenting questions not previously constrained by Covenants in the initial Equal Parenting Agreement, or the current Annual Parenting Supplement.  Full discretion on residual parenting with the Timetabled Parent, but flexibility encouraged and provided by Ad Hoc Agreements.

4.  Icing on the Cake.....

Forget about the Courts, and your Ex, and go have fun with your kids!!!







More:  About:  Equal Parenting How To's:  Three Layer Cake;
About:  Grandparents in Equal Parenting;
About:  EPR = Equal Parenting Roundups;
About: EPT =  Equal Parenting Trek;
About:  EP Trek Generic Calendar:
Issues:  Kinship Families or Grandparents raising Children::

Senator Anne Cools, FTSOTC Chair on False Accusations &
Law Societies' permitting Lawyers to Lie in Court

Senator Anne Cools, FTSOTC Chair, formerly Liberal, now Conservative

Anne Cools - Google Search
Anne Cools - Google Video

Anne Cools' Website
 Anne Cools on False Accusations

EP Nemesis, Liberal Hedy Fry, the Queen of FALSE ACCUSERS

"Honourable senators know that I have studied a terrible and pernicious heart of darkness that has developed in our court system, being the use of FALSE ACCUSATIONS in civil justice.

This is the mischief of litigating parties, usually mothers, suddenly within the context of divorce and within child custody proceedings falsely accusing the other party, usually fathers, of the sexual abuse of their own children.    ,,,    

These FALSE ALLEGATIONS are often made with the overt or covert complicity of their lawyers. They are a lethal weapon in the business of parental alienation. They are a tool for achieving sole custody of children and creating fatherlessness."

Identified Issue: Canadian Law Societies' General Failure to Self Regulate, Members permitted to Lie in Court, Anne Cools' Bill 2-12 provides an answer

2004-06-08  SENATOR ANNE COOLS LEAVES LIBERAL FOLD TO JOIN   

Senator Anne Cools Runs Away With The Suns's 10 Top Women Poll, Kevin Connor, TO Sun

2004-06-08  Liberal senator < Anne Cools >  goes Conservative

1997-10-28 Child Custody and Access Reform, Special Joint Committee Established

More:  Issues:  Cools, Senator Anne
Issues: False Accusations;
Isues Womens Shelters' Scam
Issues:Senator Anne Cools
News:  Liberal Hedy Fry / Status of Women (SOW):
Issues:  Pedophiles Fear Dads

Liberal Irwin Cotler:  "Natural Parents have NO RIGHTS"

Irwin Cotler, former Liberal "Justice" Minister robbed Canadians of their NATURAL PARENTS' Rights

Irwin Cotler - Google Search;
Irwin Cotler - Google Video


"Natural Parents have NO RIGHTS....  ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....

"Natural Parents' Rights now  gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"

16.10 Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to conform to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal BREACH OF TRUST"


FYI, the ideas that the State assigns Rights & Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from pre-war Nazi Germany.   Under the British system rights are not State-given, but God Given.

Buying into the Court's position that what rights remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same position that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.

More:  News:  Cotler, Irwin:  "Natural Parents have NO RIGHTS...;
News:  European Union;
Issues:  Paul Watson:  Nazi Origins of European Union;;;
Issues: G. Edward  Griffin ;
Issues: Fabian Socialism;

Darrin White, RIP of Prince George, BC

Death by Judicial Kleptomania - Manslaughter, Suicide, March 2000

Darrin White, suicide, Prince George - Google Search;
Darrin White, suicide, Prince George - Google Video

"Darren White died in March of 2000 by his own hand. BC Supreme Court Master Doug Baker had just ordered Darren to pay $2,071 per month in child and spousal support. His monthly income at the time of that order was only $950 after taxes.  

..He was also paying $439 a month to support an older child from a previous marriage.

... No one would listen to my father , no one would give him a chance to speak. ... My dad was an abused husband, he was abused by his wife, and the justice system.  ... He was a kind man who fought a good fight but no matter what he did or said, he could never win with this system."

More...   Testimonials: Darren White, RIP
Testimonials:  Mark Dexel, RIP of Kamloops, BC;
Testimonials:  Manley, Perry:  RIP
Testimonials:  Jeffery, Hal & Danica
Issues:  Custody Orders not Enforced;
Issues:  Parental Alienation Syndrome;
Issues:  Imputed income;
Issues:  Child Support Fraud;
Issues:  Debtors' Prison Reinstituted

Beware of the "Parental Rights" IMPOSTER!!!!

"Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights"

Be on the lookout for the "Parent's Rights" IMPOSTER.  Insist on "Natural Parents Only", please!

It comes as a big surprise to us that many groups that present themselves as "Parents Rights" groups  REFUSE to defend the  NATURAL PARENT, and  and to demand RESTORATION of Natural Parents Rights taken from Canadians in the Homosexual Marriage legislation.

Instead their position to promote the "rights" of  a "Parent" in the widest sense of the word, making NO distinction  between NATURAL PARENTS and wannaabe Legal Parents.  They have bowed to University of Victoria's  assertion that  the SCC's Trociuk Decision "endorses a Heterosexual View of the Family and must be ignored", legitimizing the ongoing Child Trafficking by the State which views Canadian children as State Property and merchandise for  sale in the lucrative Child Adoption Market  They refuse to be hampered by prior obligations to that pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can Veto an Adoption.


It appears that many "Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United Nations and Liberal Irwin Cotler's assertion that the Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent has "NO RIGHTS", making the State, not the Natural Parents the Protector of the Child..

Without Cause or Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!

More:  About:  Beware of the IMPOSTER!!!!  "Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights";
News:  Lessard, Hester - Heterosexual view of Parenthood must be ignored
News:  Smith, Judge Daphne, BCSC, for Child Trafficking;
Issues:  Trociuk, Darrell;
Issues:  Child Trafficking, Canadian;
Testimonials:  Rick Fredrickson of Saskatoon

Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges and Legal Oligarchy

Chapter VII. The English Common Law. Section 57. The Norman Conquest

A beautiy of British  Common Law is that it is STATIC, and NOT DYNAMIC as these Activist Judges would have you think.

Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and they will likely tell you it is "Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say "Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these days"

This is completely FALSE.  The Judges are Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever.  Since 1649, only PARLIAMENT has the Capacity to make Law.

British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was only observed and documented by individuals sent out by the newly Norman Crown after the Norman Conquest of 1066  to observe and codify the laws and customs of the various peoples of Britain..  This was done with a view to aggregate existing customs which may vary across the land,  into a unified body of Laws.  The Authority quoted by the Commoners in their administration of Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the Bible and principles of Danelaw

The process of documentation took only a couple of hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body of Law which was historical, popular, and has served in the intervening centuries as a Benchmark against which Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".  It does NOT change.

More:   Issues:  Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges and Legal Oligarchy;
Issues:  "Judicial Interpretation" to pervert Statutes of Parliament;
Issues:  Judicial Activism is Breach of Trust;
Issues:  Judicial Globalization is Treason

Equal Parenting Roundups for Natural Parents' Rights

An EP Roundup is a gathering of NATURAL parental rights groups that are within driving distance of one another.

An "Equal Parenting Roundup" is a gathering of all the disparate parental rights groups that are within driving distance of one another.  Whereas any group can call an "Ad Hoc" Roundup with their neihbors, we hope you will have at least one annual EP Roundup an incorporate it into the Equal Parenting Trek

An Equal Parenting Roundup is an exercise in your Freedom of Assembly and Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Assembly, following some of the traditions that established our Supremacy of Parliament

More:  About:  EPR = Equal Parenting Roundups;
About: EPT =  Equal Parenting Trek;
EP Trek Generic Calendar;
About:  Equal Parenting How To's:  Three Layer Cake;
About:  Grandparents in Equal Parenting;
About:  EPR = Equal Parenting Roundups;
About: EPT =  Equal Parenting Trek;
EP Trek Generic Calendar:Issues:  Kinship Families or Grandparents raising Children::
About:  Grandparents in Equal

Equal Parenting Trek, an annual "Progressive Convention" of Equal Parenting Roundups

More:  About:  EPT =  Equal Parenting Trek;
About:  EPR = Equal Parenting Roundups;
Meetings:  EP Trek Generic Calendar

Senator Anne Cools on the Evil of False Accusations

Anne Cools - Google Search

Anne Cools' Website
 Anne Cools on False Accusations

EP Nemesis, Liberal Hedy Fry, the Queen of FALSE ACCUSERS

"Honourable senators know that I have studied a terrible and pernicious heart of darkness that has developed in our court system, being the use of FALSE ACCUSATIONS in civil justice.

This is the mischief of litigating parties, usually mothers, suddenly within the context of divorce and within child custody proceedings falsely accusing the other party, usually fathers, of the sexual abuse of their own children.    ,,,    

These FALSE ALLEGATIONS are often made with the overt or covert complicity of their lawyers. They are a lethal weapon in the business of parental alienation. They are a tool for achieving sole custody of children and creating fatherlessness."

More:  Issues:  Cools, Senator Anne

Jay Hill, MP (Prince George – Peace River)

We are also fortunate to have Jay Hill, MP (Prince George – Peace River)  here in British Columbia. 

“I’m pushing for equality —both parents should have equal rights and equal access to their child,” Hill said. “The courts seem to start from the premise that somehow fathers aren’t responsible parents. But both parents are deemed good parents as long as the marriage lasts; why are they not when the marriage ends?”   

More:   Jay's site;
Iissues:  Hill, MP Jay.

Paul Forseth, past M.P., (New Westminster-Coquitlam-Burnaby)

We are fortunate in British Columbia to have a number of pro-family parliamentarians.  Of particular prominence is Paul Forseth, M.P. -  member of the "For the Sake of the Children" Committee, co-author of the Dissenting Opinions, and a staunch advocate of pro-family concerns.  Paul has put in many years pushing to have Equal Parenting issues brought forward to the Canadian Parliament, and faced fierce opposition from the Prime Minister.   Both Paul and Senator Cools have pressed on to redeem fathers from groups like the Status of Women (SOW) enduring multiple death threats from various radical feminist groups while serving on the Committee.  These MPs are tough.

Monday Nov.7th 2005   Dear Equal Parenting-BC:    "Conservatives are committed to Shared Parenting. The national party “Policy Declaration” that was passed by delegates at our March 2005 Montreal convention says clearly that:   65. Shared Parenting:    A Conservative Government will make the necessary changes to the Divorce Act to ensure that in the event of a marital breakdown, the Divorce Act will allow both parents and all grandparents to maintain a meaningful relationship with their children and grandchildren, unless it is clearly demonstrated not to be in the best interests of the children.    

My Liberal colleagues that served with me on the Senate-Commons committee that wrote the “For the Sake of the Children report, admitted that they have little confidence that their Party will ever enact the needed amendments to the Divorce Act, that completely fulfills the report recommendations. The NDP opposed us during the Committee process, and have never been supportive of dads.

Conservatives are the only hope for fairness and reasonableness in Divorce and Family Law. I encourage those who care, to focus their energy where it will help the most, by working to elect as many Conservatives as possible. I hope that the many who are frustrated, not become sidetracked into protest, which does nothing during an election but undercut our ability to make good things happen. The Liberals and the NDP will say anything in an election to get a vote, but they will never deliver “shared parenting”. Every vote that does not go to a Conservative in the next election is a vote against “shared parenting”. Paul Forseth MP

Betty Hinton, MP (Kamloops Thompson)

Many thanks to  Kamloops MP Betty Hinton for standing up in Parliament  for us against the State funded FATHER HATRED of the Status of Women.  For an example of Betty's provocative advocacy, see:  Betty Hinton, Kamloops Thompson MP speaks against SOW's promotion of Father Hatred

Roger Gallaway, MP (Sarnia-Lambton, ON, Liberal)

Although not from British Columbia, and less familiar to us, we cannot neglect to recognize the solid support of once Liberal MP, Rodger Gallaway of Sarnia.  Gallaway and Cools were frequently photographed together while championing the rights of children to both NATURAL PARENTS.

Arnie Hein's, "Cross My Heart" Equal Parenting Trek CA 2005

Arnie Hein "Cross My Heart" - Google Search;
Arnie Hein "Cross My Heart" - Google Video

Arnie Hein is embarking on a cross-Canada cycle to raise awareness regarding the Father being stripped of
the family by the Family Court System. He is seeking fairness.

" I want my kids back, at least half the time. I want this law that removes children from their fathers - and fathers from their children -to change. I am cycling across Canada to raise awareness of this problem.

I need other fathers to know they are not alone. I want to unify the men and children abused by this Family Court System. It is important that the general public becomes aware of this problem. "


Arnie Hein

More:  Issues:  Hein, Arnie: "Cross My Heart" Equal Parenting Trek 2005;
Meetings:  Equal Parenting Trek 2005

McKenzie & Pedersen, the "Two Robs",
Equal Parenting Bike Trek US 2006, 2007...

Robb MacKenzie Equal Parenting Bike Trek - Google Search;
Robb MacKenzie Equal Parenting Bike Trek - Google Video

Rob Pederson, Equal Parenting - Google Search;
Robert Pederson, Equal Parenting - Google Video

Cycling4Children.com Equal Parenting Bike Trek's photostream

More:  Issues:  McKenzie & Pedersen, the "Two Robs", Equal Parenting Bike Trek US 2006, 2007...;
Issues:  Smith, Ron:  DC Family Preservation Rally, Compulsory Drugging of Children;
Issues:  Compulsory Drugging of Children, Thymerisol;

Liberal Irwin Cotler:  "Natural Parents have NO RIGHTS"

Irwin Cotler, former Liberal "Justice" Minister robbed Canadians of their NATURAL PARENTS' Rights

Irwin Cotler - Google Search;
Irwin Cotler - Google Video

"Natural Parents have NO RIGHTS....  ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....

"Natural Parents' Rights now  gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"

16.10 Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to conform to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal BREACH OF TRUST"

FYI, the ideas that the State assigngs Rights & Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from pre-war Nazi Germany.   Under the British system rights are not State-given, but God Given.

Buying into the Court's position that what rights remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same position that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.

More:  News:  Cotler, Irwin:  "Natural Parents have NO RIGHTS...;
News:  European Union;
Issues:  Paul Watson:  Nazi Origins of European Union;;;
Issues: G. Edward  Griffin ;
Issues: Fabian Socialism;

Allan Rock, Liberal:



Imprisonment  & Removal of Drivers' Licenses, Passports for Non-Payment of Imputed FMEP Debts, UN's Agenda 21 Implementation, Termination of Free Speech

Allan rock, liberal - Google Search;
Allan rock, liberal - Google Search


More:  News:  Rock, Allan, Liberal:  Imprisonment  & Removal of Drivers' Licenses, Passports for Non-Payment of FMEP Debts;
News:  Houle, Francois / University of Ottawa:  Canada's Speech Crime Laws
Issues:  Coulter, Ann:  Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Assembly;
Issues:  Paul, Ron;
Issues:  "Hate Crime" Thought Police, Tyranny of Human Rights Tribunals;
News:  Robinson,
Svend  NDP MP, Lawyer & Thief for "Hate Crimes" Legislation;
Issues:  "Special Prosecutors"  for Lawyers & Judges;

Bill Graham, Pedophile Parliamentarian & Defense Minister


Bill Graham, mp - Google Search;
Bill Graham, mp - Google Video

Lawrence Metherel - Google Search

2007-06-19  Liberal MP Bill Graham announces resignation

"In spite of credible revelations dating back to April 2002 about Bill Graham, a sex addicted bi-sexual sodomizing a 15 year old male prostitute named Lawrence Metherel, Paul Martin allowed Graham to remain Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister - and eventually named him to the portfolio of Minister of Defense.

"On Sept. 28/2005 a vote was held in Parliament to raise the age of consent from 14 (one of the lowest age of consents in the world) to 16 (an age which many still consider too low).

"Bill Graham, Paul Martin, and Anne McLellan, on Sept. 28th, voted against raising the age of consent to 16

More:  News:  Graham, Bill:  Pedophile Parliamentarian, Defense Minister

Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges and Legal Oligarchy

Chapter VII. The English Common Law. Section 57. The Norman Conquest

A beautiy of British  Common Law is that it is STATIC, and NOT DYNAMIC as these Activist Judges would have you think.

Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and they will likely tell you it is "Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say "Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these days"

This is completely FALSE.  The Judges are Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever.  Since 1649, only PARLIAMENT has the Capacity to make Law.

British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was only observed and documented by individuals sent out by the newly Norman Crown after the Norman Conquest of 1066  to observe and codify the laws and customs of the various peoples of Britain..  This was done with a view to aggregate existing customs which may vary across the land,  into a unified body of Laws.  The Authority quoted by the Commoners in their administration of Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the Bible and principles of Danelaw

The process of documentation took only a couple of hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body of Law which was historical, popular, and has served in the intervening centuries as a Benchmark against which Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".  It does NOT change.

More:   Issues:  Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges and Legal Oligarchy;
Issues:  "Judicial Interpretation" to pervert Statutes of Parliament;
Issues:  Judicial Activism is Breach of Trust;
Issues:  Judicial Globalization is Treason

Debtor's Prison, abolished in 1869 in the UK, reinstituted to appease "Femi-Nazis"

Debtor's Prison - Google Search;
Debtors Prison - Google Video;
Debtors Prison abolished - Google Search

The common practice in BC Courts when Fathers do not pay Child Support - which most of the time is merely Imputed - is to send non-paying Father to Prison until he or his family members pay the fees imposed by the Judge. 

1869-xx-xx Debtors Act 1869 (c.62), United Kingdom

Even when mothers agree that Child Support should no longer be paid, we find that the Family Enforcement agencies, which are private contractors functioning as Bounty Hunters, typically refuse to end their claim on the father's income,.

More:  Issues:  Debtors's Prison Reinstituted;
Issues:  Passports Removed to Appease Femi-Nazis;
Issues:  Driver's Licenses removed to appease "Femi-Nazis";
Testimonials:  Jeffery, Hal & Danica;
Issues:  Imputed income;
Issues:  Child Support Fraud;

Barbara Kay, National Post

Barbara Kay - Google Search;
Barbara Kay - Google Video

"In Ontario alone, the names Cornwall, Prescott, and London became synonymous with "respectable" pedophile rings -- lawyers, doctors, police officers and Catholic clergymen -- that for decades preyed on society's most vulnerable boys."

;

2007-09-26 Forgetting the male victims of child abuse, Barbara Kay

2006-06-14  Welcome to the matriarchy, Barbara Kay;


More.... Issues:  Barbara Kay,  National Post;
Testimonials:  Prior, Byron: Sexual Abuse;
News:  Mount Cashel Orphanage, St. John's NL;
Issues:  Boys Of St. Vincent <Mount Cashel, NL>
News: Southin, Mary: BC Judge backs Pedophilia, Solicitation of Children for Sexual Activities;
News:  Ramsay, Judge David BC Judge & Pedophile
News:  Orr, Judge David:  Protection of Pedophiles in Public Service;
News:  Hickman, T. Alex, NL Judge, alleged Pedophile & Town Tyrant
Testimonials:   Earle, Shane: Mount Cashel Orphange, NL;
Testimonials: Samson, Pierre:  Duplessis Orphans, QU
News:  Duplessis Orphans:  Nazi Experiments Orphange, NL
Issues: Child Trafficking by Public Officers & Judges;
Issues:  Judicial Freemasonry
Issues:  Judicial Interpretation;
News:  Crowley, Aleister:  Luciferian Freemasonry, Homosexual Pedophilia & Pederasty;

 Philip Mayfield, Cariboo - Chilcotin

We also wish to thank retired MP Philip Mayfeild,  Cariboo - Childotin for his work in the Joint Committee.

Recovered pages of EPG website

equalparenting.net

Rights of fathers Ignored?
Both Parents Vita, Lynn Bentz
Broken Homes Mean Bleak Future
Fatherneed
Perception vs Reality
"For the Sake of the Children"
Some Facts on Families



Fathers for Life


Yahoo Groups





Click here to join equalparenting-bc













































KRights Radio!











Fathers for Life






Equal Parenting Trek - US:  Equal Parenting Roundups from Seattle & LA to Washington DC

Yahoo Groups





Click here to join equalparenting-bc

MeetUp Groups









Equal Parenting March on your local Courthouses & Legislative Buildings:  How-To's


A March is not a Parade. 

A parade is historically derived from a March, but the connotations are very different.  A Parade is the result of an UNCHALLENGED MARCH, and is a statement of CONQUEST! A Parade is more of a “Look at me.  I'm a Boss.  I can do what I want.” type of thing.   Note the flamboyant Law-Breaking of the "Gay Parades".

A March is NOT festive.  

A March is a very serious, somber affair.  In British law, and elsewhere I suppose, to own land you have to occupy it.  To occupy it you have to walk on it at least once a year.  You will remember even Abraham had to walk on his land to lay claim to it.  This tradition / principle goes back a very long way.

To maintain occupancy rights you have to walk on your land every so often, or you may loose your right to occupancy to squatters.  By not walking on your land, every year that goes by, the squatters have a better claim to “your” land.  If you want your land right maintained you walk on your land once a year.

The kind of March we would like to see is an opportunity to exercise our right to FREE ASSEMBLY and FREE SPEECH (like our land), and SUPREMACY OF PARLIAMENT over the COURTS.  Rights you don't exercise once a year can be lost.  We could just do what is “normal” historically, and start with a few guys assembled on a corner in such a way as to make a public statement.  Images of the Salvation Army come to mind.  You might have a guy on his literal soapbox saying a few things to anybody that would listen, while the other guys stand around with tracts and Contact Us info.  Get your new guys into the local Meeting that very week.  If people listen, the speaker might go on about some issue for a bit, but the idea is to keep it short, and pick up your things and move down the street a few blocks, and do it all again at another location. 

You want to STAY ON THE MOVE to get your brief message out as efficiently as possible, and to gather up as many marchers as you can.  You want some really Big Bastard looking guys up front.  Put the biggest on in front with the Mace to set the pace.  The next biggest goes further  back with the big Bass Drum pounding out the time.  If it gets big, you'll want to make some of your medium sized guys into "Sheriffs" who run along side the March to make sure nobody interferes or gets hurt.   This can be a lot of  fun, and very good for your head if you've been emotionally battered..

Hopefully, you pick up a bunch of comrades to join you as you move along.  Eventually, you may just be marching, handing out tracts, and asking fellows to march along with you to the <Courthouse / Legislature.> 

You could plan your March to progress past the Courthouses and terminate at the Legislative Buildings or a Park where there' lots of foot traffic and space.   Finish with a big Hurrah and Thump of the Bass Drum.   Then break up. This is all part of the Democratic process, but Canadian government is rapidly becoming very autocratic.  There are more reasons than Equal Parenting to MARCH.

In the old days, a march was a call to battle.  You’d march around with your drums beating, your pipes and whistles blasting, and march your men eventually down to the field, and you’d line them up along one side.  If you had an opponent – the squatters, for example - they’d march their men down the other side, and a some point you’d go at it.  To the winner go the spoils.   I don’t imagine we’d be doing that any more.  We don’t have to. We DO have to EXERCISE OUR RIGHTS, however. 

The Statement to send is that:

  1. We are here. 

  2. This is OUR land, and OUR Courts, and OUR Legislative Buildings, not yours.

  3. We are not going away. 

  4. We will fight your Tyranny to protect our Freedom and our children's Freedom

  5. On Guard!!

Orange Order Parade in SCARBOROUGH 2010

Orange Order Parade in SCARBOROUGH 2010

Harthill Loyalists at Glasgow Walk 2010

Harthill Loyalists at Glasgow Walk 2010  

UDR Parade 27th February 2010

UDR Parade 27th february 2010

 

Equal Parenting March on your local Courthouses & Legislative Buildings, How-To's

A parade is historically derived from a March, but the connotations are very different.  A Parade is the result of an UNCHALLENGED MARCH, and is a statement of CONQUEST!  

The kind of March we would like to see is an opportunity to exercise our right to FREE ASSEMBLY, to FREE SPEECH, and to SUPREMACY OF PARLIAMENT over the COURTS

More:  About:  EPT March, How To;
About:  EPR = Equal Parenting Roundups;
About: EPT =  Equal Parenting Trek;
EP Trek Generic Calendar

Equal Parenting Roundups for Natural Parents' Rights

An "Equal Parenting Roundup" is a gathering of all the disparate parental rights groups that are within driving distance of one another.  Whereas any group can call an "Ad Hoc" Roundup with their neihbors, we hope you will have at least one annual EP Roundup an incorporate it into the Equal Parenting Trek

An Equal Parenting Roundup is an exercise in your Freedom of Assembly and Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Assembly, following some of the traditions that established our Supremacy of Parliament.  Ideally, you will want be evangelical about your Roundup, you can add to it's end a Free Man's March

More:  About:  EPR = Equal Parenting Roundups;
About: EPT =  Equal Parenting Trek;
About:  EPT March, How To
EP Trek Calendar

Equal Parenting How To's 

Equal Parenting is like a Three Layer Cake. 

1.  The Bottom Layer:  The Initial Equal Parenting Agreement

Initial Equal Parenting Agreement creating full time, all time equality of both natural parents, subordinate to no third parties (a Constitutional right ignored by most Family Courts); a series of tentative Parenting Timetables for each year and statement of intent, or  "Wishes"; the requirement that the tentative Parenting Timetable laid out there will be reviewed and finalized annually and incorporated into the Annual Parenting Supplement.  Parental authority and discretion is always equal and unaffected by inequalities of Parenting Time allocations.

2.  Middle Layer:  The Annual Supplement

Yearly Annual Parenting Supplements for planning the school year and finalizing the Parenting Timetable for the upcoming  parenting year.  Parenting Timetable must meet the test for equality established in 1) the initial Equal Parenting Agreement.

3.  Top Layer:  Autonomy of Both Equal Parents on all matters not previously Constrained.

Parenting Timetable alternates all residual parenting questions between the two otherwise equal parents who are subordinate to no third parties.  Full autonomy of each parent during their Parenting Time as allotted in the agreed Parenting Timetable on all residual parenting questions not previously constrained by Covenants in the initial Equal Parenting Agreement, or the current Annual Parenting Supplement.  Full discretion on residual parenting with the Timetabled Parent, but flexibility encouraged and provided by Ad Hoc Agreements.

4.  Icing on the Cake.....

Forget about the Courts and your Ex, and go have fun with your kids!!!

More:  About:  Equal Parenting How To's:  Three Layer Cake;
About:  Grandparents in Equal Parenting;
About:  EPR = Equal Parenting Roundups;
About: EPT =  Equal Parenting Trek;
EP Trek Generic Calendar
:Issues:  Kinship Families or Grandparents raising Children::
About:  Grandparents in Equal Parenting


     

Copyright 2002  equalparenting-bc.ca 

 

       Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages  exercising democratic rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.