|

Anne Cools - Google Search

Anne Cools' Website
Anne Cools
on False Accusations
EP Nemesis,
Liberal Hedy Fry, the Queen of FALSE ACCUSERS
"Honourable senators know that I have studied a terrible and pernicious
heart of darkness that has developed in our court system, being the use
of
FALSE ACCUSATIONS in civil justice.
This is
the mischief of litigating parties, usually mothers, suddenly within the
context of divorce and within child custody proceedings falsely accusing
the other party, usually fathers, of the sexual abuse of their own
children. ,,,
These
FALSE ALLEGATIONS are often made with the overt or covert complicity
of their lawyers. They are a lethal weapon in the business of parental
alienation. They are a tool for achieving sole custody of children and
creating fatherlessness."
More:
Issues: Cools,
Senator Anne |
|

We are also fortunate to have
Jay Hill, MP
(Prince George – Peace River) here in British Columbia.
“I’m
pushing for equality —both parents should have equal rights and equal
access to their child,”
Hill said. “The courts
seem to start from the premise that somehow fathers aren’t responsible
parents. But both parents are deemed good parents as long as the
marriage lasts; why are they not when the marriage ends?”
More:
Jay's site;
Iissues: Hill, MP Jay. |

We are fortunate in British Columbia to have a
number of pro-family parliamentarians. Of particular
prominence is Paul Forseth,
M.P. - member of the "For the Sake of the Children"
Committee, co-author of the
Dissenting Opinions, and a staunch advocate of pro-family
concerns. Paul has put in many years pushing to have Equal
Parenting issues brought forward to the Canadian Parliament, and
faced fierce opposition from the Prime Minister. Both
Paul and Senator Cools have pressed on to redeem fathers from groups
like the Status of Women (SOW) enduring multiple death
threats from various radical feminist groups while serving on the
Committee. These MPs are tough.
Monday Nov.7th 2005 Dear Equal
Parenting-BC: "Conservatives are committed to
Shared Parenting. The national party “Policy Declaration” that was
passed by delegates at our March 2005 Montreal convention says
clearly that: 65. Shared Parenting: A
Conservative Government will make the necessary changes to the
Divorce Act to ensure that in the event of a marital breakdown, the
Divorce Act will allow both parents and all grandparents to maintain
a meaningful relationship with their children and grandchildren,
unless it is clearly demonstrated not to be in the best interests of
the children.
My Liberal colleagues that served with me on
the Senate-Commons committee that wrote the “For
the Sake of the Children report, admitted that they have
little confidence that their Party will ever enact the needed
amendments to the Divorce Act, that completely fulfills the report
recommendations. The NDP opposed us during the Committee process,
and have never been supportive of dads.
Conservatives are the only hope for fairness
and reasonableness in Divorce and Family Law. I encourage those who
care, to focus their energy where it will help the most, by working
to elect as many Conservatives as possible. I hope that the many who
are frustrated, not become sidetracked into protest, which does
nothing during an election but undercut our ability to make good
things happen. The Liberals and the NDP will say anything in an
election to get a vote, but they will never deliver “shared
parenting”. Every vote that does not go to a Conservative in the
next election is a vote against “shared parenting”.
Paul Forseth MP |
|

Although not from British Columbia, and less familiar
to us, we cannot neglect to recognize the solid support of once Liberal
MP, Rodger Gallaway of
Sarnia. Gallaway and Cools were frequently photographed together
while championing the rights of children to both
NATURAL PARENTS. |
| |
Should mandatory Equal Parenting become law how will the
following issues be addressed?
Firstly, this is something you can do NOW, with EXISTING
legislation. If you wait for things like the gutted "For the Sake of the
Children" legislation to get past the current crowd of
Activist Judges, you and your kids
will be waiting a long time.
|
Recall: Essential Ingredients of an Equal Parenting
Agreement: the three "layers":
-
Initial Equal Parenting Agreement creating full time, all time equality
of both natural parents, subordinate to no third parties (a Constitutional
right ignored by most Family Courts); a series of tentative
Parenting Timetables for each year and statement of intent, or
"Wishes"; the requirement that the tentative Parenting Timetable laid out
there will be reviewed and finalized annually and incorporated into the
Annual Parenting Supplement. Parental authority and discretion is
always equal and unaffected by inequalities of Parenting Time
allocations.
-
Yearly
Annual Parenting Supplements for planning the school year and finalizing
the
Parenting Timetable for the upcoming parenting year.
Parenting Timetable must meet the test for equality established in 1)
the initial Equal Parenting Agreement.
-
Parenting Timetable alternates all residual parenting questions
between the two otherwise equal parents who are subordinate to no third
parties. Full autonomy of each parent during their
Parenting Time as allotted in the agreed Parenting Timetable on all
residual parenting questions not previously constrained by Covenants
in the initial Equal Parenting Agreement, or the current Annual Parenting
Supplement. Full discretion on residual parenting with the Timetabled
Parent, but flexibility encouraged and provided by Ad Hoc Agreements.
|
Recall: Trust Terminology applied to a Parenting Agreement
constructed as a formal Trust.
You don't have to set up your equal Parenting Agreement as a
Trust, but it helps in manifold ways. After the “death” of the
married parents, they “settle” the care of the marriage’s children (and
assets for the benefit of the beneficiaries / children) to the “Trustees” – the
unmarried parents. Use “Covenants” and “Wishes” for the
Settlors’ binding and non-binding intents on the “death” of the married
parents. Trustees who do not obey the Trusts are removed from the
list of Trustees (in effect, loose legal custody, not necessarily physical
custody, as in “Friendly Parent Rule”.) |
What if one or both of the former spouses re-marries?
Do the Step Parents have Parenting Rights and get involved in
the Parenting Agreements?
No, and No!! |
What if an employer transfers a Natural Parent to another city, state or
province?
Don't do it. You have "prior commitments".
If you go without prior arrangements with the remaining Natural Parent, you will
forfeit your Parenting Time for at least the current parenting year. You
may be able to work something out in the next
Annual Parenting Agreement Supplement .
We adamantly discourage
Move-Aways because it
separates a Child from one of their Natural Parents and the
established family & social network (all the more necessary when
their family is disrupted).
We encourage zero-tolerance of Sole Custodial
Parents' practice of contriving a
Move-Away to
Alienate a Natural
Parent, almost always a Dad.
In the event of a truly necessary
Move-Away, we would
encourage that the children remain in their familiar environment
and maintain their social activities and friends in conformity
with the last
Annual Agreement.
A critical point of
Equal Parenting as we
have it set up is that Equal Parents share the
decision-making capacity equally. The Natural Parent
moving away has de facto by consent assigned some of their
Parenting Time to the Natural Parent who remains and will
probably incur the wrath of the corrupt
Child Support Tables, but they DO NOT loose any right to
make parental decisions. There has to be good reason to
eliminate a parent from Equal Parenting status.
Again, equality is about status and
decision-making, not
Parenting Time – although Parenting Time should be about
equal in the long haul
|
What if the family has siblings one which decides to remain with the mother, and
the other with the father?
This is sometimes called "Split
Custody". Set this up when you're making the
Annual Parenting Agreement Supplements
and tweaking the Parenting Timetable it contains.
Kids always have the ability to ask the
Timetabled Parent if they can have a sleepover for special events at the
other parent’s as an “Ad Hoc” Agreement, but whether or
not this change happens is exclusively at the discretion of the
Timetabled Parent.
We encourage cooperation and facilitating a
happy life for the kids, but it is always at the discretion of
the Timetabled Parent whether or not the change will be
made.
Again, by allowing the child a sleep-over at
the non-Timetabled parent’s, the Timetabled Parent looses
NOTHING in rank or right. There is ZERO IMPACT on their
ability to function in the future as an equal parent. This
is directly analogous to leaving your kids with a baby sitter or
a school teacher.
Kids do seem to be drawn to male and female
parents in some unpredictable alternating pattern to come to
some kind of balance of viewpoints over time. The
Annual Parenting Agreement Supplements and zero-legal-impact
Ad Hoc agreements support this, but we discourage an obvious
departure from equal Parenting Time in a given year until a few
years after puberty.
Parents with kids living in 'blended
families" will have as many Agreements as there are pairs of
Natural Parents. .... Do keep that simple, please. |
|
What if one of the EPs enrolls the child in an activity without the agreement of
the other parent? What about the costs & effects on Parenting Time?
Like the move-away, whoever makes a decision has to take
responsibility for the consequences of their decision and bear the costs.
Like any other area of law, the instigator of the disturbance is also required
to cease or provide Remedy for the disturbance caused by their decision.
It's probably better not to do it at all.
By consent, of course, the two Equal Parents
can do anything they want in the formal
Annual Parenting Supplements of in an Ad-Hoc Agreement.
We encourage parents to demonstrate problem
solving, reason, and fair play. The current methods of
Feminist double-talk, double standards, and bullying NCPs
into capitulation under the fear of greater
Femi-Narcissism has to be named, labeled and and eradicated
in the Equal Parenting community..
|
What if one parent has an RESP (Registered Education Savings Plan) for a Child,
but the other does not? How are the costs for Post secondary education
dealt with?
RESP contributions should be planned in the Annual
Supplemental Agreement. In our experience, parents are usually too broken
by the Family Law Industry to take asset management and financial planning
seriously, but that is not where we want to be.
We aim to get Family Assets away from the
Family Court Industry and into a Trust vehicle for RESPs and
housing.
In view of the trickery used to put into
place the
Child Support Tables, we don’t accept their legitimacy.
(These are a gross farce, purposed to transfer wealth from men
to women.) For the sake of argument, however, we can take the
contributions of “support” per child given by the Tables by each
parent and use the RATIO of contributions the Tables provides as
a basis for determining the RELATIVE contributions of each
parent to RESPs (and other provisions) for the children.
The Family Court Industry can’t sensibly
argue with that. We take the position that these
contributions will of course be “Child Support” so far as the
Tables go, and are simply allocated for a specific purpose.
Other examples are team memberships, musical instruments,
lessons and so forth. We need to eliminate or minimize the
ability of a spendthrift mother to dissipate family assets and
children’s inheritance after divorce.
|
Does Equal Parenting prevent new relationships & children? How does that
work in terms of Child Support.
No, Future relationships and Children are not precluded.
It does bring up the rather GLARING deficiency of the
Child Support Tables in that they make NO accommodation for other children
of the Payor born before OR afterwards.
The
Parenting Time of the NP in a new marriage should probably
be diminished in the next
Annual Agreement to give the "new relationship’ time
alone for a year or two to get established. This
diminishment of Parenting Time in no way diminishes the Status
of either EP, and after a couple years the Parenting
Timetable will be back to normal. . |
If not between Natural Parents, Sexual
Activity around Children is Passive Sexual Abuse, and invites
Sexual Predators
We are not impressed with mothers who
displace Dad by hooking up with some other man. Women are
now more likely than men to be promiscuous and have affairs
while married, BTW.
This "Step-parent" scenario is the context
identified as one of the top three scenarios in which active Sexual
Abuse
occurs, and we take a very dim view of mothers moving into this
“I need a man” mode.
Just last night one of our guys reported his
problem with his ex. repeatedly having sex in front of his ~6yr
old son, and having sex with two or three of the men in her
neighborhood. Mom is evidently promiscuous.
While Mom was "engaged" in the bedroom, his
son and a little girl from the neighborhood started going i
trying to copy Mom and her boyfriend in the living room.
We call this
Passive Sexual Abuse.
Don’t expect the
Ministry of Children and Families to stop Mom from doing
this, though! They will probably fake up a bunch of
False Accusations
against Dad to keep Mom doing whatever she wants! MCF has
a long history of making children available for
sexual abuse
In general, however, we reckon unmarried “new relationships”
to be a disturbance to the security of the children’s relationships with their
Natural Parents, and if you are looking for a Naughty Weekend with your lover,
you had best keep the children out of it by not doing it on your
Parenting Time,
or if you can't control yourself, by leaving the children with the other Natural
Parent while you relieve yourself. |
When the child is at a young age how does Equal Parenting
affect the child's school if one of the former spouses reside outside of the
child's school district?
Again, the Annual Parenting Supplement is the time to
lay down the plan for the upcoming year. Part of that is establishing a “Parenting
Community” which hopefully doesn’t change year over year. By consent
parents can do anything, of course, but we would encourage avoiding change if at
all possible, from the tentative plan laid out in the initial Equal Parenting
Agreement.
If the “Parenting Community” must change, we would encourage
that it change at natural breaks like switches form Elementary School to Middle
School, and of course to not make changes until a school year is complete.
This is an example of where having two parents not living together is actually
an advantage. Having Equal Parenting in place provide for more rather than
less stability for the children with their social peer group. Remember a
parent who moves away, moves away alone, until the next Annual Supplement or Ad
Hoc Agreement makes other provisions, and they do NOT loose their equality of
decision making as a result.
|
|
|