|
Anne Cools - Google Search
Anne Cools' Website
Anne Cools
on False Accusations
EP Nemesis,
Liberal Hedy Fry, the Queen of FALSE ACCUSERS
"Honourable senators know that I have studied a terrible and pernicious
heart of darkness that has developed in our court system, being the use
of
FALSE ACCUSATIONS in civil justice.
This is
the mischief of litigating parties, usually mothers, suddenly within the
context of divorce and within child custody proceedings falsely accusing
the other party, usually fathers, of the sexual abuse of their own
children. ,,,
These
FALSE ALLEGATIONS are often made with the overt or covert complicity
of their lawyers. They are a lethal weapon in the business of parental
alienation. They are a tool for achieving sole custody of children and
creating fatherlessness."
More:
Issues: Cools,
Senator Anne |
|
We are also fortunate to have
Jay Hill, MP
(Prince George – Peace River) here in British Columbia.
“I’m
pushing for equality —both parents should have equal rights and equal
access to their child,”
Hill said. “The courts
seem to start from the premise that somehow fathers aren’t responsible
parents. But both parents are deemed good parents as long as the
marriage lasts; why are they not when the marriage ends?”
More:
Jay's site;
Iissues: Hill, MP Jay. |
We are fortunate in British Columbia to have a
number of pro-family parliamentarians. Of particular
prominence is Paul Forseth,
M.P. - member of the "For the Sake of the Children"
Committee, co-author of the
Dissenting Opinions, and a staunch advocate of pro-family
concerns. Paul has put in many years pushing to have Equal
Parenting issues brought forward to the Canadian Parliament, and
faced fierce opposition from the Prime Minister. Both
Paul and Senator Cools have pressed on to redeem fathers from groups
like the Status of Women (SOW) enduring multiple death
threats from various radical feminist groups while serving on the
Committee. These MPs are tough.
Monday Nov.7th 2005 Dear Equal
Parenting-BC: "Conservatives are committed to
Shared Parenting. The national party “Policy Declaration” that was
passed by delegates at our March 2005 Montreal convention says
clearly that: 65. Shared Parenting: A
Conservative Government will make the necessary changes to the
Divorce Act to ensure that in the event of a marital breakdown, the
Divorce Act will allow both parents and all grandparents to maintain
a meaningful relationship with their children and grandchildren,
unless it is clearly demonstrated not to be in the best interests of
the children.
My Liberal colleagues that served with me on
the Senate-Commons committee that wrote the “For
the Sake of the Children report, admitted that they have
little confidence that their Party will ever enact the needed
amendments to the Divorce Act, that completely fulfills the report
recommendations. The NDP opposed us during the Committee process,
and have never been supportive of dads.
Conservatives are the only hope for fairness
and reasonableness in Divorce and Family Law. I encourage those who
care, to focus their energy where it will help the most, by working
to elect as many Conservatives as possible. I hope that the many who
are frustrated, not become sidetracked into protest, which does
nothing during an election but undercut our ability to make good
things happen. The Liberals and the NDP will say anything in an
election to get a vote, but they will never deliver “shared
parenting”. Every vote that does not go to a Conservative in the
next election is a vote against “shared parenting”.
Paul Forseth MP |
|
Although not from British Columbia, and less familiar
to us, we cannot neglect to recognize the solid support of once Liberal
MP, Rodger Gallaway of
Sarnia. Gallaway and Cools were frequently photographed together
while championing the rights of children to both
NATURAL PARENTS. |
| |
Femicentric Parenting, the Status Quo in British Columbia
There little doubt that in new
marriages,. it is the femicentric IN-EQUALITY of parents that imposes an
inherent risk and instability into every marital bond in this Province. Surely,
this instability alone PRECIPITATES marital breakdown and divorce
in many cases. There is no question that many divorces would never happen if Equal Parenting
Agreements were in effect prior to conception. The best time to make
an Equal Parenting Agreement is probably before marriage. If you do nothing, the
system is rigged to bust up your family, and to send men in particular
into the poorhouse. Every member of your family looses.
Stats Canada has reported that the AVERAGE age of the
YOUNGEST
child when the divorce is filed has now dropped below THREE years old. What were these women thinking of when
they decided to become pregnant? Why wouldn't they end the marriage
before bringing these children into a family they were on the cusp of
tearing apart?
In
British Columbia, 91% of the filings are by the mothers. Not surprising,
since
mothers have historically had a 92% probability of getting sole custody if they
want it, and all the "benefits" that brings. This is a
deception of the Industry. By pitting the mothers against the fathers in
the BC Family Courts, the
Family Law industry provides itself with a bountiful steady unearned income. The women of
divorce get just a tiny fraction of the "winnings" extorted from the men,
forever enslaved to these perps.
Because so many divorced women had driven their ex-husbands
broke and were themselves going onto welfare and overloading the women's
shelters and becoming a burden on the Taxpayer, the Provincial NDP Party
extended a divorced woman's financial claims beyond the children's natural
fathers to any man she could develop a sexual relationship with. Prior to this
change, the new man in her life would have to adopt the children after marriage
to become financially responsible for them.
The NDP made things even worse by encouraging women to get
into relationships with men knowing they can end the the relationship at any
time, and prosecute for money any man foolish enough to get involved with them.
The deception of being a "Victim" has been very effective
in driving fathers, who might have revealed the deception, out of their
children's lives..
See Anne
Cools on False Accusations
Quite apart from the catastrophic consequences
to BC Families these FALSE VICTIMS create, their deception have made many
question the REAL LEGITIMATE CLAIMS of REAL VICTIMS.
It is always very difficult enough for REAL VICTIMS of
abuse to expose the REAL PERPETRATORS. It seemed overly convenient that
so quickly after the horrors of real victims of abuse finally started being heard than so many women got on the
Victim bandwagon that the FALSE MEMORY SYNDROME defense was developed.
This gave the real perpetrators, often in the "care-giving" businesses
themselves, enough of a distraction to make a clean getaway. Some of them
were making money at the same time. This is an
unbelievable cruelty to the real victims, and perpetrated by other women,
masquerading as "Victims".
The Presumption of Sole Custody except by Consent of
the mother is of course in contravention of the
Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedom (Section 15.1 & Section 28).
The Presumption of Sole Custody except by Consent of
the mother is a flagrant disregard for the children's' needs for
both parents, and the legal battles it creates moves incredible wealth from British Columbian families
to British Columbian lawyers and other BC Family Law professionals .
|
|
should
ever be forgot
