"Natural
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
"Natural
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"
16.10 Maximum
Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to conform
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal BREACH OF TRUST"
FYI,
the ideas that the State assigns
Rights &
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from pre-war Nazi
Germany. Under the British system rights are not
State-given, but God Given.
Buying
into the Court's position that what rights remain are Children's Rights,
is buying into the same position that "<Natural> Parents have no
rights", and Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.
...
No one would listen to my father
, no one would give him a chance to speak. ... My dad was an abused
husband, he was abused by his wife, and the justice system. ... He
was a kind man who fought a good fight but no matter what he did or
said, he could never win with this system.
Instead their position to promote the "rights" of
a "Parent" in the widest sense of the word, making NO distinction
between NATURAL PARENTS and wannaabe
Legal Parents. They have bowed to
University of Victoria's
assertion that the SCC's
Trociuk Decision"endorses a
Heterosexual View of the Family and must be ignored",
legitimizing the ongoing
Child
Trafficking by the State which views
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in the
lucrative Child Adoption
Market They refuse to be hampered by prior obligations to that
pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can
Veto an Adoption.
It appears that many
"Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United Nations and
Liberal Irwin Cotler's
assertion that the
Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent has
"NO RIGHTS", making the
State, not the Natural Parents the
Protector of the Child..
Without
Cause or Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and they will
likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these days".
This is
completely FALSE. The Judges are Agents of the Crown
and they BY DEFINITION Judges
are WITHOUT CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
1649, only PARLIAMENT
has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was only observed
and documented by individuals sent out by the newly Norman Crown after
the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the laws and
customs of the various peoples of Britain.. This was done with a
view to aggregate existing customs which may vary across the land,
into a unified body of Laws. The Authority quoted by the Commoners
in their administration of
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
Bible and principles
of
Danelaw
The process of documentation took only a couple of
hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body of Law which was
historical, popular, and has served in the intervening centuries as a
Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
Equal Parenting Roundups for Natural Parents' Rights
An EP Roundup is a gathering of NATURAL parental rights groups
that are within driving distance of one another.
An
"Equal Parenting Roundup" is a gathering of all the disparate
parental rights groups
that are within driving distance of one another. Whereas any group
can call an "Ad Hoc" Roundup with their neihbors, we hope you will have
at least one annual EP
Roundup an incorporate it into the
Equal Parenting Trek
"Honourable senators know that I have studied a terrible and pernicious
heart of darkness that has developed in our court system, being the use
of
FALSE ACCUSATIONS in civil justice.
This is
the mischief of litigating parties, usually mothers, suddenly within the
context of divorce and within child custody proceedings falsely accusing
the other party, usually fathers, of the sexual abuse of their own
children. ,,,
These
FALSE ALLEGATIONS are often made with the overt or covert complicity
of their lawyers. They are a lethal weapon in the business of parental
alienation. They are a tool for achieving sole custody of children and
creating fatherlessness."
We are also fortunate to haveJay Hill, MP(Prince George – Peace River) here in British Columbia.
“I’m
pushing for equality —both parents should have equal rights and equal
access to their child,”
Hill said. “The courts
seem to start from the premise that somehow fathers aren’t responsible
parents. But both parents are deemed good parents as long as the
marriage lasts; why are they not when the marriage ends?”
We are fortunate in British Columbia to have a
number of pro-family parliamentarians. Of particular
prominence is Paul Forseth,
M.P. - member of the "For the Sake of the Children"
Committee, co-author of the
Dissenting Opinions, and a staunch advocate of pro-family
concerns. Paul has put in many years pushing to have Equal
Parenting issues brought forward to the Canadian Parliament, and
faced fierce opposition from the Prime Minister. Both
Paul and Senator Cools have pressed on to redeem fathers from groups
like the Status of Women (SOW) enduring multiple death
threats from various radical feminist groups while serving on the
Committee. These MPs are tough.
Monday Nov.7th 2005 Dear Equal
Parenting-BC: "Conservatives are committed to
Shared Parenting. The national party “Policy Declaration” that was
passed by delegates at our March 2005 Montreal convention says
clearly that: 65. Shared Parenting: A
Conservative Government will make the necessary changes to the
Divorce Act to ensure that in the event of a marital breakdown, the
Divorce Act will allow both parents and all grandparents to maintain
a meaningful relationship with their children and grandchildren,
unless it is clearly demonstrated not to be in the best interests of
the children.
My Liberal colleagues that served with me on
the Senate-Commons committee that wrote the “For
the Sake of the Children report, admitted that they have
little confidence that their Party will ever enact the needed
amendments to the Divorce Act, that completely fulfills the report
recommendations. The NDP opposed us during the Committee process,
and have never been supportive of dads.
Conservatives are the only hope for fairness
and reasonableness in Divorce and Family Law. I encourage those who
care, to focus their energy where it will help the most, by working
to elect as many Conservatives as possible. I hope that the many who
are frustrated, not become sidetracked into protest, which does
nothing during an election but undercut our ability to make good
things happen. The Liberals and the NDP will say anything in an
election to get a vote, but they will never deliver “shared
parenting”. Every vote that does not go to a Conservative in the
next election is a vote against “shared parenting”.
Paul Forseth MP
Although not from British Columbia, and less familiar
to us, we cannot neglect to recognize the solid support of once Liberal
MP, Rodger Gallaway of
Sarnia. Gallaway and Cools were frequently photographed together
while championing the rights of children to both
NATURAL PARENTS.
Arnie Hein's, "Cross My Heart" Equal Parenting Trek
CA 2005
Arnie Hein is embarking on a cross-Canada cycle to raise awareness
regarding the Father being stripped of
the family by the Family Court System. He is seeking fairness.
" I want my
kids back, at least half the time. I want this law that removes children
from their fathers - and fathers from their children -to change. I am
cycling across Canada to raise awareness of this problem.
I need other fathers to know they are not alone. I want to unify the men
and children abused by this Family Court System. It is important that
the general public becomes aware of this problem. "
"Natural
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
"Natural
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"
16.10 Maximum
Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to conform
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal BREACH OF TRUST"
FYI,
the ideas that the State assigngs
Rights &
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from pre-war Nazi
Germany. Under the British system rights are not
State-given, but God Given.
Buying
into the Court's position that what rights remain are Children's Rights,
is buying into the same position that "<Natural> Parents have no
rights", and Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.
"In spite of credible revelations dating back to
April 2002 about Bill Graham, a sex addicted bi-sexual sodomizing a 15
year old male prostitute named
Lawrence Metherel, Paul Martin
allowed Graham to remain
Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister - and eventually named him to the
portfolio of Minister of Defense.
"On Sept. 28/2005 a vote was held in Parliament to raise the age of
consent from 14 (one of the lowest age of consents in the world) to 16
(an age which many still consider too low).
"Bill Graham, Paul Martin, and Anne McLellan, on
Sept. 28th, voted against raising the age of consent to 16
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and they will
likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these days".
This is
completely FALSE. The Judges are Agents of the Crown
and they BY DEFINITION Judges
are WITHOUT CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
1649, only PARLIAMENT
has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was only observed
and documented by individuals sent out by the newly Norman Crown after
the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the laws and
customs of the various peoples of Britain.. This was done with a
view to aggregate existing customs which may vary across the land,
into a unified body of Laws. The Authority quoted by the Commoners
in their administration of
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
Bible and principles
of
Danelaw
The process of documentation took only a couple of
hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body of Law which was
historical, popular, and has served in the intervening centuries as a
Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
The common practice in BC Courts when Fathers do not
pay Child Support -
which most of the time is merely
Imputed - is to send
non-paying Father to Prison until he or his family members pay the fees
imposed by the Judge.
Even when mothers agree that Child Support should no
longer be paid, we find that the Family
Enforcement agencies, which are private contractors functioning as
Bounty Hunters, typically refuse to end their claim on the father's
income,.
EqualParenting-BC
invites websites in other Provinces and States to create
collaborative web-pages and link with us when they share our
purpose of making available to those that need them any day of
the week
MEETINGS, within driving distance of the alienated parent
who still suffers.
Homosexual
Activists with their ubiquitous
"Friends in Court". frequently enter and end marriage
for no reason other than to further abase Marriage and
"Exercise the Courts" creating legal presidents for
Homosexual
Marriage For the other
98% of us however, we
think Marriages are entered with at least the INTENT of
forming a long term, if not life-long commitment in which to
raise children.
Sadly the propaganda of the
"Queen of False Accusers"
Hedy Fry and her
EVIL
Status of Women (SOW) and the despicable and typically
lesbian-run
Women's Shelters
(see
Erin Pizzey)
seem to regularly win
The War Against the Family
convincing
women to file a Petition for Divorce in 92% of Divorce Proceedings
brought before BC Courts, by the way consuming 40% of the BC Courts
time and presumably creating 40% of the BC Law Society's business.
In BC, 93% of
the women creating this Casework for BC Courts are rewarded with
Sole Custody and with that, all the Commissions and sympathy that go to the poor
"Single Mother". In the vast majority of
cases, we expect, she is "a foolish woman <who> tears down her own home."
In
Equal Parenting
Anonymous
we do nothing to make marriages "work". It takes a
MINIMUM of TWO to make a Marriage. It takes
only one to end it.. Only occasionally, is it both
parties who end a Marriage, and only occasionally is there
NOT
a Victim
left behind. For those Victims, both Adult and Child, we have
EPA
and EPA
Meetings. There we instruct newcomers on
EP How Tos and
construct
Equal Parenting Agreements to propose to the Petitioner,
and if not accepted by Consent, to pursue as Respondent in
Family Court.
Although usually unsuccessful, we still expect Judges to
award Costs to our Respondent EPAs, both Moms & Dads, when
they have already made a Offer to settle on an
Equal Parenting Agreement..
The dates for these are found at the
Equal Parenting Trek Calendar
and the
EP Trek Meetup. During your
EP Roundups, we are asking you to build your
program with Private and Public sessions having Private and
Public Speakers. Ideally you will have some great
Testimonials and
Public Speakers to put on
YouTube. If you need more than ten minutes, you
can put them on
Google Video
Phyllis Schlafly & Stephen Baskerville on KRights Radio,
February 14, 2006
"The Family
Courts are a bunch of second rate hangers-on
... build each other's businesses through
referrals...Family Law is a <parasitic> self-sustaining
Industry"
Canadian Family Courts routinely divide divorced families on the
basis of sex, alienating the children from their fathers,
and impose crushing penalties on Fathers who do not accept the
femicentric view of the Courts and Public Service. When fathers argue
with these tax-funded Custodians of the Public Trust, they are
typically maligned as "angry" and "unfit to be parents" of their own
children, jeopardizing the tenuous relationship they may have
retained with their children during the Proceedings. Falsifying records,
Reports and
Court Depositions to accuse Dads has common practice in Social Worker's offices, and are supplemented by falsified
information provided by the Public Schools. RCMP policy is
such that in attending a Domestic Dispute the parent to be
arrested is NOT the parent creating the disturbance, but the
"heaviest" parent, ie Dad.
Canadian Courts routinely punish Canadian Fathers
more harshly for
the "crime" of being a Male Parent than they
do the criminals we pay them to protect us from, who commit robbery
and murder. Dads are routinely sentenced to 29 years, while convicted murders are free in 7 years. Dad's "debts" to the FMEP - often farcical because of "Imputing" non-existing income to
Dads - are unforgivable and Dads are sent to Debtors Prison where
their debts are compounded, loose their passports and Driver's
Licenses while Extortionists don't repay their Debts and are free
after "serving their time". Women committing violence against
Men and children are in a position of profound privilege in Canadian
and BC Courts, and routinely receive little or no punishment for
crimes of violence and perjury. None of this would be possible without first striking Dad out as a Custodial Parent and giving Sole
Custody to Mom. None of this would be possible if Parents and
their kids were not robbed their Constitutional Right to Equal
Parenting. We don't want to tell you the how bad the
statistics are for a Dad facing the BC Family Court for fear of
encouraging you Mom's to bust up your family and taking Dad there.
A word has come into use for the Father Hatred, which has become
entrenched in our Civil Service. The word is
MISANDRY, the compliment to the
grossly over-used female counterpart "Misogyny".
After many months of Public Hearings held across Canada - all held
under numerous death threats and bomb threats - individually
against Committee members and corporately against Meeting Attendees
- fathers and other concerned Canadians across Canada aided by the
Joint Committee prepared in 1998 their
For the Sake of the Children Report. This gave formal
recognition of many of the atrocities being perpetrated by the
sexist Civil Servants against Canadian Families. It observed,
for example, that Canadian Courts invariably refused to abide by
EXISTING legislation in which Parliament instructs the Courts to
maintain the "Maximum Contact" of parents and children, and
that Sole Custody should only be given to a Parent which will
ensure that the "Maximum Contact" (i.e. Equal Contact) is
facilitated with BOTH NATURAL PARENTS. This is commonly called
the
"Friendly Parent Rule", which you've probably never heard of,
and is an example of the growing intransigence of the Courts
regarding the Supremacy
of Parliament. The Report also acknowledged that
Canadian Courts commonly accept FALSE ACCUSATIONS as fact
when
they are made by women against Fathers, and in it's original form
recommended that Legislation be made to make False Accusations in
Family Court be made a criminal offense. While the
Meetings were being held, we were told by Legal Counsel that any
proposed Legislation prepared by the Committee would be
stopped by
Homosexual Activists and that these same well positioned
Activists would instead
INCREASE the burden on fathers and ram Homosexual Marriage
through the Canadian Parliament. This seemed impossible at the
time, but we have since had to accept these reports as correct.
We are consistently told that homosexual/Activists are grossly
overrepresented in the Law Societies and Benches, and that the
distortion is in the order of about 25:1 relative to the
Canadian population at large. (Stats Canada reports
Homosexuals & Bisexuals combined represent 1.7% of the Canadian
population.) The explanation offered for this gross distortion
is that many Feminist & Homosexual Activists began entering Law in
the sixties to achieve their goals and this is the reason the Law
Societies and Benches are now grossly over-represented by them.
We know of no other protection from these
Activist Judges other than the
Supremacy of Parliament.
"We
shall sodomize your sons, emblems of
your feeble masculinity, of your shallow
dreams and vulgar lies.
We shall seduce
them in your schools, in your
dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your
locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in
your seminaries, in your youth groups,
in your movie theater bathrooms, in your
army bunkhouses4 in your truck stops, in
your all-male clubs, in your houses of
Congress, wherever men are with
men together.
Your sons will become our
minions and do our bidding. They will be
recast in our image. They will come to
crave and adore us.",
StatsCanada reports the fraction of
Homosexuals and Bisexuals combined
comprise 1.7% of the Canadian population
- that is a 58:1 ratio Hetero :
non-Heterosexuals.
For the Sake of the Children proposals were strenuously rejected by those represented by
Liberal
Hedy Fry.
Fry's primary concern seemed to be that perjury and use of
false
accusations to gain sole custody NOT be made a criminal offense
as was anticipated at the Hearings and was included in the earlier
Legislation proposals.
Ultimately, the Liberal Government collaborated with Fry & SOW's demands
to remove preventative measures against perjury in Family Courts.
Paul Forseth, MP Eric Lowther, MP and Philip Mayfield, MP
felt so strongly about the remedies for such things as FALSE
ACCUSATIONS being excised from the Report that they wrote
their
Dissenting Opinions in protest.
Today, Activist Judges and other Activist Civil Servants continue to run
amuck harassing Canadian Families rather than
enforce the Law as it now stands even WITHOUT the changes
proposed in
For the Sake of the Children . They
continue to tear
families apart and drive Dads away from their children.
Current Legislation incorporates the "Maximum Contact Principle" and
the
FRIENDLY PARENT RULE which (with the Charter of rights and
freedoms prohibitions discrimination on the basis of sex) requires
that children are to be
raised by BOTH NATURAL PARENTS EQUALLY, and that a
SOLE CUSTODIAL
PARENT who does not use those powers to maintain Maximum Contact
(i.e., Equal Contact) SHALL LOOSE THOSE CUSTODIAL POWERS.
These provisions,
For the Sake of the Children
revealed, are being completely ignored by the Courts who by their
practice reveal their objective of destroying the Family and forming
a Global Cabal of Treasonous Judges. The argument they are using to
advance their Fabian
Socialist cause will only work in a Constitutional Law context,
because as they have observed, "We live under Constitutional
Law, but it's we Judges who will decide what the Constitutional Law
requires". Explore what they are saying by searching
World Constitutionalism. (They really ARE perpetrating the
grossest TREASON by building a fabric of Globalist Courts from which
they expect to "Rule the World".)
The
Liberals and a few
Pink Tories are a clearly complacent in overthrowing our
centuries old
Supremacy of Parliament
in pursuit of
a new Socialist system. Rather than prosecute the
Activist
Judges and charge them with
Criminal Breach of
Trust and
TREASON, the
Liberal Government, (supported by these same
Pink Tories),
having characterized itself by capitulating to
rather than prosecuting and directing the Supreme Court, continued
to rewrite Canadian Statute to conform to Judicial Practice by
moving to ELIMINATE the
Divorce Act's 16.10, the so-called
"MAXIMUM CONTACT" and "FRIENDLY
PARENT RULE" provisions of Parliament. See
FACT's tract below.
Our Legislative System has been built and predicated on the
Supremacy of Parliament, and is not equipped with protections for
Society from these same Activist Judges who often are guilty of
Criminal BREACH OF TRUST. It is clear that the need to
prosecute these
Activist Judges and
Public Servants for
BREACH OF TRUST
is great, but we rely on these same individuals who clearly
refuse to prosecute themselves.
Rather that prosecute Activist Judges (and other activist Civil Servants), the
Liberals capitulated to the SCC's homophillic directives and
began changing
the Law to expunge from Canadian Statutes the historic right of
NATURAL PARENTS to parent their
NATURAL CHILDREN. In place of the
"heterosexist"
term NATURAL PARENT, the Liberals began
substituting the new term LEGAL PARENT.
By doing so, the Liberals were fixed on eradicating a Canadian's
Parenting Rights utterly, and placing all powers of Parenting into
the hands of these very same homophillic Judges See:
FACT's C22 Radicals.pdf.
If
you never sign a
Master Joyce Guardianship Model (or any
other non-equal
Parenting Agreement), your kids'
Custodial Parent, Step-Parent, Teacher,
Social Worker, or
Pastor
can never point to your Signature and tell
them that you didn't want them or that you
gave them up BY CONSENT.
Always
MAKE THE JUDGE SIGN the disgusting Sole
Custody Order and reap the consequences
later.
Meanwhile, we hope
estranged Dads can look forward to a Happy
Reunion with your children in not too many
years.
Equal Parenting-BC.ca offers electronic support for groups
pursuing Equal Parenting of both Natural Parents and their children before,
during, and
after marriage. Groups seem to
need to be of two basic types: Support / Recovery likeEqual
Parenting Group Society, and Political
Action, like Families-4-JusticeandFathers-4-Justice.
For the sake of your headspace, it seems to be a good idea not to mix the two
types on the same day. Our desire is to get you first into a Support /
Recovery Group. When you have developed some peer support and feeling better
adjusted to the crushing realities of being a Dad in Canada, we then hope to
send you on to the various Political Action groups. How groups
organize themselves is entirely their own affair. The "Granddaddy" Group
is the Equal Parenting Group Society, but when we found that finding a common
format was getting in the way of pursuing an individual Group's goals, we
decided to abandon that idea and let the individual Chapters evolve naturally
with minimum interference from the Society proper. One such Chapter
evolved into the Families-4-Justice Society whose purpose is focused on
Legislative change, relieving EPG of that purpose, and permitting better focus
on residual issues like pesonal support for Beat-Dead Dads. We see this as an
entirely healthy thing. Similarly, EqualParenting-BC.ca is here to
facilitate passing on to new groups the methods we have found to work by
introducing them to temporary "Sponsor" Groups. If you are a
Natural Parent or Natural Child whose relationship has been destroyed or damaged
by the formidable forces at work today to destroy these relationships, we
encourage you get to a MEETING and find or
form some local Group you feel comfortable with and join.
We will
show you how to do Equal Parenting, and how to form your Group. We welcome Grandparents, Fathers, Mothers, Teens, and to the
best of our ability, the Children.
The Equal Parenting Group Society is a
registered Society in British Columbia. We are
dedicated to the Equality of Male and Female Parents and to
the inherent right of every child to love and be
loved by both parents. We reject the doctrine of
presumed sole custody to the mother. We reject the
premise that
every case of shared custody is "unique" and
requires an array "professional" reports to decide
parenting.
We are committed to
restoring the equality of parenting relationships between
Natural Parents and their children destroyed in the
present "Mixed
War" against BC Families. There is a plethora of
Courts and Government agencies set on the
Enticement of
Mothers to destroy their families and feed their Industry
with the children's inheritance and the Family's Assets.
Prior to 1972, Enticement was prohibited by Federal Law,
and the Victims of Enticement were able to claim penalties
against the perpetrators of Enticement - a practice
which Feminist Groups now commit as their "raison d'etre",
typically with Public Funding. In BC,
Enticement - the act of intentionally causing a wife
to leave her husband or intentionally interfering with a
married couple’s consortium, formerly a common law cause
of action - was then expressly forbidden by the BC Family
Relations Act. We work hard to equip
parents of both sexes
with our methods and support to effect the
Equal Parenting
of their natural Children after Divorce. The primary
antagonists of Equal Parenting is surprisingly NOT the
Mothers, but the Government Agencies and , in sharp
contrast with we want to see fathers having the desire
and perseverance necessary to overcome the systemic malice
towards fathers presented by and
Father Hatred Industry back into their children's lives in
a meaningful way and gain the equal parental status with
BC mothers they deserve.
We believe that the attack on the
democratic traditions of our Canadian Parliament and
Legislatures due to
Party Discipline and hijacking of our Courts by
Judicial Activists is so great that no
Agent of the Government the Law Societies, and
the Civil Service can safely be trusted to act in the best
interest of Canadian Families. We therefore do not
wish to loose our autonomy by adopting the usual
dependency of their Funding for our operations.
Self-Funding, and private contributions are welcomed to
help us focus on rectifying the damage done by these
Agencies, distinguishing us from other "Father's groups"
who, like the Feminist PAC groups, depend on funding from
the very Government Agencies we hope to embarrass and
influence.
What we have accomplished has been
done thus far with ZERO government funding.
We welcome your participation, fellowship, and support in pursuing Equal
Parenting for BC children and families. If you would like to join with us,
please contact us at
info@equalparenting-bc.ca.
The Conservative Party of
Canada (CPC) has a policy document describing its platform. ...
The current document is at
HERE. It has this to say about family law:
56. Family
i) The Conservative
Party of Canada believes that the family unit is essential to
the well-being of individuals and society, because that is where
children learn values and develop a sense of responsibility.
Therefore government legislation and programs should support and
respect the role of the Canadian family. September 8, 2004 Page
16 Conservative Party of Canada
ii) The Conservative Party of Canada believes in the right and
duty of parents to raise their own children responsibly
according to their own conscience and beliefs. We believe no
person, government or agency has the right to interfere in the
exercise of that duty except through due process of law.
iii) The Conservative Party of Canada believes that Parliament,
through a free vote, and not the courts should determine the
definition of marriage. A Conservative government would support
the freedom of religious organizations to determine their own
practices with respect to marriage.
... Robert T McQuaid, Orangeville
Ontario, Decriminalize parents
Equal Parenting - BC's objectives will be
achieved when fathers and their children have real, true,
practical opportunity for relationship equal to that of mothers.
Their relationship will not be threatened by the many
femi-narcissistic groups using public funds on the pretence of
bettering the lot BC Children and Families when in fact they are
primarily interested in bettering the lot of women (and
lesbians) over men (and heterosexuals).
Children and fathers in British Columbia will
not be enjoy the assurance and stability Equal
Parenting offers until the BC Legislature has
eliminated the Misandry
these femicentric "Feminist" groups have cultivated against
fathers and their children. Ending public funding of
femi-narcissistic groups is an easy and effective means of
reducing the present father-hatred that permeates our civil
service and publicly funded NGOs.
See
48
Recommendations for the summation of the Joint Committee
Report
For the Sake of the Children Report prepared in the
nineties of the to address these systemic problems in
Canadian Family Law, but was cast off by the Liberal Party,
ignoring the petition of their own Liberal delegates to the
Committee. Few fought harder to defeat Equal Parenting
than
Hedy Fry & SOW. In particular
Hedy Fry, Liberal MP Vancouver Centre refused to end
her determination to derail the proposed changes until the
proposal to make FALSE ACCUSATIONS punishable was purged
from the submission. In time, Prime Minister Jean
Cretien broke the deal struck between opposing groups to
get Equal Parenting legislation passed together with the grossly
inflated "Child
Support Guidelines".
Prime Minister Cretien, pressured by
Hedy Fry & SOW (Status Of Women) discarded the
48
Recommendations, and passed only the grossly inflated
"Support Guidelines".
Equal Parenting policies will likely eliminate about 80% of
the BC Family Law / Father Hatred industry's business, freeing our energy and
stimulating our productivity. When in place, Equal Parenting
Enforcement Officers, possibly local police, will hand out Non-Compliance
"tickets" to parents interfering with equal parenting time as commonly as
speeding tickets are handed out today. By adopting Equal Parenting
policies, we think the present rate of divorce in British Columbia be at least
halved. We think the birthrate will will return to replacement levels; the
number of children living with both parents will certainly double, and drop the
cost of assisting troubled teens by half..
The Charter makes
absolutely NO REFERENCE to SEXUAL ORIENTATION. This is simply a wish of
the Judiciary. By adopting Equal Parenting, the present Mother Victim /
Father Abuser Paradigm; and Mother Decision-Maker, Spender / Father Serf -
Breadwinner Paradigm will have been thoroughly shattered. The professional
promulgators of Father Hatred will be silenced. The enslavement of
non-custodial fathers by the Family Law industry and their lovely assistants
will have been publicly recognized and remedied.
Children will play together in
peace and security, forming their peer relationships for the
future, unencumbered by the fear of the opposite sex.
They will have the knowledge and certainty that the wisdom
of both parents is easily and readily available on demand.
They will look forward to finding their "special person" and
forming their own family knowing that "family" is truly a
bastion of security and a bulwark against the hardships of
the world.
Children can happily forget that their
mothers once falsely accused and decapitated their fathers
routinely, mounted their heads on the pikes of the Family
"Justice" system and then had them paraded them though the
streets with the FMEP and the "DeadBead Dads"
websites, all to the praises and cheers of their
sisterhood,. Family Values will be restored.
We think that will be some time. To
continue, please go to Issues.
About "Equal Parenting", our response to SOW's deception &
defeat of the Joint Committee
1.
The Bottom Layer: The Initial Equal Parenting Agreement
Initial Equal Parenting Agreement creating full time, all time
equality of both natural parents, subordinate to no third parties (a
Constitutional right ignored by most Family Courts); a series of
tentative
Parenting Timetables for each year and statement of intent, or
"Wishes"; the requirement that the tentative Parenting Timetable laid
out there will be reviewed and finalized annually and incorporated into
the
Annual Parenting Supplement. Parental authority and discretion
is always equal and unaffected by inequalities of Parenting Time
allocations.
3.
Top Layer: Autonomy of Both Equal Parents on all matters not
previously Constrained.
Parenting Timetable alternates all residual parenting questions
between the two otherwise equal parents who are subordinate to no third
parties. Full autonomy of each parent during their Parenting Time
as allotted in the agreed Parenting Timetable on all residual parenting
questions not previously constrained by Covenants in the initial Equal
Parenting Agreement, or the current Annual Parenting Supplement.
Full discretion on residual parenting with the Timetabled Parent, but
flexibility encouraged and provided by Ad Hoc Agreements.
4.
Icing on the Cake.....
Forget about the Courts and your Ex, and go have fun with your kids!!!
Hester Lessard, Feminist Law,
University of Victoria
"Heterosexual View of Parenthood must be ignored"
"Trociuk is .. a
disheartening endorsement of biological concepts of parenthood
... flawed .... it legitimizes a heterosexual view of the family. ..
It must be ignored."
"HELP invents ideological policy-based evidence to
push for increasing institutional child care and decreasing the
time children spend with parents"
Clyde Hertzman wants to know everything he can about about
your family and children. He and his
Human Early Learning Partnerships program has been
successful in subverting our privacy laws to legalize his
collection, analysis, and reporting of your family's
personal information to global policy makers.
Presently, the burden of proof is on the Accused to prove
themselves innocent (unless you are in a Criminal Court), Rare is the Judge who enforces Perjury laws against a
woman.
Having been put on a "Hit List" by
SOW. Ken sued
SOW's Pierrette
Bouchard for Defamation. He lost.
The Judge said in effect that even though
SOW's material was
incorrect, was published in newspapers across Canada, is
damaging Ken's consulting career, and is used to script
Government Policy,
Bouchard and
SOW were not found
culpable for Damages, because, the Judge said, the Readership
knows or ought to know
SOW is not a reliable source, and what
SOW writes is "just
an opinion". (For Contrast see
Testimonials: Prior, Byron:
Sexual Abuse by Public Officer)
As
of spring of 2010 SOW
is holding Ken liable for Court Costs and Damages for having
lost his case in Court. They are expecting him to pay
around $70,000. To stay abreast of this see
www.fathers.bc.ca and
come to a
CourtWatch Meeting during Ken's proceedings.
Note: "Court Costs" is the same device your lawyer
has probably used to trick you into abandoning your kids to the
SCP...... "as
a father you have a ninety something percent probability of
failure if you pursue
Joint Custody
in Court....., so you better cut your losses and avoid adding to
your Bill the Court Costs and the SCP's expenses."
Your are then trapped by Consent. We want to see you withEqual
Parenting
Equal Parenting March on your local Courthouses &
Legislative Buildings, How-To's
A parade is historically derived from a
March, but the connotations are very different. A Parade is the result of
an UNCHALLENGED MARCH, and is a statement of CONQUEST!
The kind of March
we would like to see is an
opportunity to exercise our right to FREE ASSEMBLY,
to FREE SPEECH,
and to SUPREMACY OF PARLIAMENT
over the COURTS.
FYI the rate of violence and murder in
lesbian relationships is bizarrely high when compared to
heterosexual couples. Sexual mutilation of the corpse is
common, but not reported in the papers for fear of offending the
"gays".
"Conservatives are committed to Shared Parenting. The
national party “Policy Declaration” that was passed by delegates
at our March 2005 Montreal convention
says
clearly that: Shared Parenting: is an objective of the
Conservative Party of Canada.
A Conservative
Government will make the necessary changes to the Divorce Act to
ensure that in the event of a marital breakdown, the Divorce Act
will allow both parents and all grandparents to maintain a
meaningful relationship with their children and grandchildren,
unless it is clearly demonstrated not to be in the best
interests of the children".
Equal Parenting Roundups for Natural Parents' Rights
An
"Equal Parenting Roundup" is a gathering of all the
disparate parental rights groups that are within driving
distance of one another. Whereas any group can call an "Ad
Hoc" Roundup with their neihbors, we hope you will have at least
one annual EP Roundup
an incorporate it into the Equal
Parenting Trek
An
Equal Parenting Roundup is an exercise in your Freedom of
Assembly and Freedom of
Speech and Freedom of Assembly, following some of the
traditions that established our
Supremacy of
Parliament. Ideally, you will want be evangelical
about your Roundup, you can add to it's end a Free Man's
March
External, existing legislation on
Parental Fitness is sufficient. It is
important that Equal
Parenting legislation be SILENT on a Parental Fitness
to give clear direction to the Courts.
The
Doctrines of "Rights
and Responsibilities" of a good Socialist now being promulgated in
Schools and Family Courts is an idea developed in pre-war Nazi Germany.
They have been popularized by
Peter Drucker.
Fitness Testing IS a core element of Nazism, Eugenics, Socialism,
and a fulfillment of the Peter
Drucker vision for Global Socialism. Fitness Testing of
Natural Parents and Students must be stopped, and it's Practitioners
fired.
Lawyers consistently estimate the homosexual fraction of
the Law Societies & Judiciaries as "forty-something" percent.
That is, a randomly selected Judge or Lawyer is about thirty
times more likely to be homosexual than the population at large
2006-01-19
The Straight slate - Port Moody–Westwood–Port Coquitlam, Mary Woo
Siims, Straight.com;
"Mary Woo Sims, the former chief commissioner of the
BC Human Rights Commission,
is a hero to some in the gay and lesbian community for her record as
a defender and promoter of human rights.
Sims, a motorcycle-riding lesbian, lost a bid last year to
get elected to Coquitlam city council",
Georgia Straight
Former
Senator Nancy Schaefer and her husband Bruce have died from
a single shot wound each. The deaths are being handled as
a 'murder-suicide'. <Ha!> The husband shot once in the chest.
Nancy was shot once in the back. Both shots were
lethal. Two shots, Two Kills
Families-4-Justice was formed to permit multiple
memberships in "father's groups" other than F4J, which is
presently disallowed by
Fathers-4-Justice. This is
presumably because of the
clandestine nature of F4J operations. In response,
Families-4-Justice is aimed at lobbying for legislative change for Equal Parenting specifically
and exposing the misandry and "Organized
Crime" against BC Families being perpetrated by the BC Courts.
Copyright 2002 equalparenting-bc.ca
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.
should
ever be forgot
The Equal Parenting Group Society is a
registered Society in British Columbia. We are
dedicated to the Equality of Male and Female Parents and to
the inherent right of every child to love and be
loved by both parents. We reject the doctrine of
presumed sole custody to the mother. We reject the
premise that
every case of shared custody is "unique" and
requires an array "professional" reports to decide
parenting.
We are committed to
restoring the equality of parenting relationships between
Natural Parents and their children destroyed in the
present "
