|
Anne Cools - Google Search
Anne Cools' Website
Anne Cools
on False Accusations
EP Nemesis,
Liberal Hedy Fry, the Queen of FALSE ACCUSERS
"Honourable senators know that I have studied a terrible and pernicious
heart of darkness that has developed in our court system, being the use
of
FALSE ACCUSATIONS in civil justice.
This is
the mischief of litigating parties, usually mothers, suddenly within the
context of divorce and within child custody proceedings falsely accusing
the other party, usually fathers, of the sexual abuse of their own
children. ,,,
These
FALSE ALLEGATIONS are often made with the overt or covert complicity
of their lawyers. They are a lethal weapon in the business of parental
alienation. They are a tool for achieving sole custody of children and
creating fatherlessness."
More:
Issues: Cools,
Senator Anne |
|
We are also fortunate to have
Jay Hill, MP
(Prince George – Peace River) here in British Columbia.
“I’m
pushing for equality —both parents should have equal rights and equal
access to their child,”
Hill said. “The courts
seem to start from the premise that somehow fathers aren’t responsible
parents. But both parents are deemed good parents as long as the
marriage lasts; why are they not when the marriage ends?”
More:
Jay's site;
Iissues: Hill, MP Jay. |
We are fortunate in British Columbia to have a
number of pro-family parliamentarians. Of particular
prominence is Paul Forseth,
M.P. - member of the "For the Sake of the Children"
Committee, co-author of the
Dissenting Opinions, and a staunch advocate of pro-family
concerns. Paul has put in many years pushing to have Equal
Parenting issues brought forward to the Canadian Parliament, and
faced fierce opposition from the Prime Minister. Both
Paul and Senator Cools have pressed on to redeem fathers from groups
like the Status of Women (SOW) enduring multiple death
threats from various radical feminist groups while serving on the
Committee. These MPs are tough.
Monday Nov.7th 2005 Dear Equal
Parenting-BC: "Conservatives are committed to
Shared Parenting. The national party “Policy Declaration” that was
passed by delegates at our March 2005 Montreal convention says
clearly that: 65. Shared Parenting: A
Conservative Government will make the necessary changes to the
Divorce Act to ensure that in the event of a marital breakdown, the
Divorce Act will allow both parents and all grandparents to maintain
a meaningful relationship with their children and grandchildren,
unless it is clearly demonstrated not to be in the best interests of
the children.
My Liberal colleagues that served with me on
the Senate-Commons committee that wrote the “For
the Sake of the Children report, admitted that they have
little confidence that their Party will ever enact the needed
amendments to the Divorce Act, that completely fulfills the report
recommendations. The NDP opposed us during the Committee process,
and have never been supportive of dads.
Conservatives are the only hope for fairness
and reasonableness in Divorce and Family Law. I encourage those who
care, to focus their energy where it will help the most, by working
to elect as many Conservatives as possible. I hope that the many who
are frustrated, not become sidetracked into protest, which does
nothing during an election but undercut our ability to make good
things happen. The Liberals and the NDP will say anything in an
election to get a vote, but they will never deliver “shared
parenting”. Every vote that does not go to a Conservative in the
next election is a vote against “shared parenting”.
Paul Forseth MP |
|
Although not from British Columbia, and less familiar
to us, we cannot neglect to recognize the solid support of once Liberal
MP, Rodger Gallaway of
Sarnia. Gallaway and Cools were frequently photographed together
while championing the rights of children to both
NATURAL PARENTS. |
| |
March How to's
|
 |
A March is not a Parade.
A parade is historically derived from a
March, but the connotations are very different. A Parade is the result of
an UNCHALLENGED MARCH, and is a statement of CONQUEST! A Parade is more of a
“Look at me. I'm a Boss. I can do what I
want.” type of thing. Note the flamboyant Law-Breaking of the "Gay
Parades".
A March is NOT festive.
A March is a very serious, somber affair.
In British law, and elsewhere I suppose, to own land you have to occupy it.
To occupy it you have to walk on it at least once a year. You will
remember even Abraham had to walk on his land to lay claim to it. This
tradition/principle goes back a very long way.
To maintain occupancy rights you have to
walk on your land every so often, or you may loose your right to occupancy to squatters.
By not walking on your land, every year that goes by, the squatters have a better claim
to “your” land. If you want your land right maintained you walk on your land
once a year.
The kind of March this writer would like to see is an
opportunity to exercise our right to ASSEMBLY and FREE SPEECH (like our land).
Rights you don't exercise once a year can be lost. We could just do what
is “normal” historically, and start with a few guys assembled on a corner in
such a way as to make a public statement. Images of the Salvation Army
come to mind. You might have a guy on his literal soapbox saying a few
things to anybody that would listen, while the other guys stand around with
tracts and Contact Us info. Get your new guys
![]() into the local Meeting that
very week. If people listen, the speaker might go on about some
issue for a bit, but the idea is to keep it short, and pick up your things and
move down the street a few blocks, and do it all again at another location.
You want to STAY ON THE MOVE to get your brief message out as efficiently as
possible, and to gather up as many marchers as you can. You want some
really Big Bastard looking guys up front. Put the biggest on in front with
the Mace to set the pace. The next biggest goes further back with
the big Bass Drum pounding out the time. If it gets big, you'll want to
make some of your medium sized guys into "Sheriffs" who run along side the March
to make sure nobody interferes or gets hurt. This can be a lot of
fun, and very good for your head if you've been emotionally battered.. |
Hopefully, you pick up a bunch of comrades
to join you as you move along. Eventually, you may just be marching,
handing out tracts, and asking fellows to march along with you to the
<Courthouse>. You could plan your March to progress past the Courthouses
and terminate at the Legislative Buildings or a Park where there' lots of foot
traffic and space. Finish with a big Hurrah and Thump of the Bass
Drum. Then break up. This is all part of the
Democratic process, but Canadian government is rapidly becoming
very autocratic. There are more reasons than Equal Parenting to MARCH.
In the old days, a march was a call to
battle. You’d march around with your drums beating, your pipes and whistles
blasting, and march your men eventually down to the field, and you’d line them
up along one side. If you had an opponent – the squatters, for example - they’d
march their men down the other side, and a some point you’d go at it. To the
winner go the spoils. I don’t imagine we’d be doing that any
more. We don’t have to. We DO have to EXERCISE OUR RIGHTS, however.
The Statement to send is that:
- We are here.
- This is OUR land, and OUR Courts, and OUR Legislative Buildings, not
yours.
- We are not going away.
- We will fight your Tyranny to protect our Freedom and our children's Freedom
- On Guard!!
 |
|
should
ever be forgot
