Shouldn't Web-Site Organization parallel the Canadian "Federal" System of confederating Provinces?

Canada's "Federal" system as created by the British North America Act, 1867 .  It created a new legal entity called "Canada" as "Federation" of hitherto independent,  pre-existing Provinces and Territories. 

Prior to "Confederation" each Province was autonomous and for many years refused to be ruled by a body of interlopers in Ottawa.  To overcome the the Provinces' intransigence, the "Confederation" of Canadian Provinces and Territories had to be  created in observance of the condition that each Province retained it's  autonomy certain scopes which was ultimately prescribed in the BNA:  namely natural resources, language, schooling, health care, etc. These remained the SOLE jurisdiction of the Provinces.   The newly created "national government" was given a complimentary, but relatively short list of functions (including national defense, immigration, and currency)  which all Provinces by assent deferred to the new legal entity, the "national" government.    The War of 1812 against the American's vision of "Manifest Destiny" was well within living memory.

" ...  The Fathers of Confederation created an original form of government: a constitutional monarchy based on the principle of parliamentary supremacy, combined with a federation of self-governing provinces..."    . Federalism in Canada

The word "federal" refers to the notion that the Provincial Governments and National Governments operate in discreet spheres without interference one upon the other.  However, due to ignorance or ill-conceived tolerance, Canadians have suffered monstrous intrusions of the national government into domains which are solely of Provincial jurisdiction. 

Since Trudeau  Ottawa has used their powers of unlimited taxation and Party Discipline to morph Canada into a Dictatorship or Oligarchy, and make Parliamentary legislation which routinely intrude into Provincial matters like natural resources, language, marriage, schooling, and health care.  They have spent Canadians' tax money as if it was their own to assert powers over the Provinces they don't Constitutionally possess!  The frequent claim from Ottawa to excuse their chronic bullying of the Provinces was that Canadians wanted a "strong central government".  At some point it is not inconceivable to De-Confederate Canada, if necessary, and simple "opt out" of the growing Dictatorial Regime in Ottawa and beyond.

The Monarch's historic role of Ombudsman over a potentially abusive Parliament  was ended in Canada, thanks to Pierre Elliot Trudeau's  Constitution Act, 1982..   In the event the Prime Minister asserts dictatorial control, Canadians cannot now Appeal to the Queen, or her Appointee, the Governor General of Canada.   As a consequence of the British Civil War and Cromwell's  Declaration of the Commonwealth in 1649, the British Monarch has had no legislative powers.  All of these have been devolved to a duly elected Parliament.

As Head of State, however, the Monarch, prior to 1982 retained powers to instruct the Prime Minister to either Form or Dissolve Parliament.  In the latter, an Election would be called to bring to Canadians the question of who was to form their Government.  It is not clear if this is still the case, and is seems likely it is not.  In any case, the lessons of history indicate tht dictatorial regimes, such as that which Cromwell faced and  which will soon face Canadians once again, must be taken down by an armed and bloody  rebellion.  How foolish Canadians have been to permit the Prime Minister to shrug off his accountability to the Crown.

We believe that to confront the abuses the Parliament and the Courts have perpetrated on Canadian Families, there is good reason for Equal Parenting groups to follow the pattern by which our Legislatures and national Parliament were set out. By design the two levels of government, Provincial & National / Federal were separate and discrete. 

It's probably a good idea for  for our web sites to pattern themselves along the same lines as the BNA: focusing on either provincial, or national issues.  We need to establish an audible presence in the form of discussion at the provincial and state legislative houses.  This is probably most effective if new sites limit their scope to the provincial or state level.  (It's easy for a Politician to ignore you if you are in another Province.)

Among many other things, the Trudeau era has so weakened the Canadian Family in Statute, in government practice and in funding as to make "family making" an extremely precarious and dangerous proposition for Canadian men.  Can it be entirely by chance that Canadian families cannot now offer much resistance to the increasingly autocratic Aristocracy in Ottawa?