Beware of the "Parental Rights" IMPOSTER!!!!
"Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights"
Be on
the lookout for the "Parent's Rights" IMPOSTER. Insist on "Natural
Parents Only", please!
It comes as a big surprise to us that many groups
that present themselves as
"Parents Rights" groups REFUSE to defend the
NATURAL PARENT, and and to demand
RESTORATION of
Natural Parents Rights taken from Canadians in the
Homosexual Marriage
legislation.
Instead their position to promote the "rights" of
a "Parent" in the widest sense of the word, making NO distinction
between NATURAL PARENTS and wannaabe
Legal Parents. They have bowed to
University of Victoria's
assertion that the SCC's
Trociuk Decision
"endorses a
Heterosexual View of the Family and must be ignored",
legitimizing the ongoing
Child
Trafficking by the State which views
 Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in the
lucrative Child Adoption Market They
refuse to be hampered by prior obligations to that pesky Natural Parent
who thinks they can Veto
an Adoption.
It appears that many
"Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United Nations and
Liberal Irwin Cotler's
assertion that the
Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent has
"NO RIGHTS", making the
State, not the Natural Parents the
Protector of the Child..
Without
Cause or Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!
More: About:
Beware of the IMPOSTER!!!! "Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's
Rights";
News:
Lessard, Hester - Heterosexual view of Parenthood must be ignored
News: Smith, Judge
Daphne, BCSC, for Child Trafficking;
Issues: Trociuk,
Darrell;
Issues:
Child Trafficking, Canadian;
Testimonials:
Rick Fredrickson of Saskatoon |
Beware of the IMPOSTER!!!!
"Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights"
Be on
the lookout for the "Parent's Rights" IMPOSTER. Insist on "Natural
Parents" only, please!
It comes as a big surprise to us that many groups
that present themselves as "Parents Rights" groups do NOT
subscribe our position that it is the NATURAL
PARENT who's rights are being impinged upon.
Instead their position is to promote the "rights" of
a "Parent" in the widest sense of the word, and make NO distinction for
the rights of a NATURAL PARENT and a NATURAL CHILD to be with each
other.
More: About:
Beware of the IMPOSTER!!!! "Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's
Rights" |
|
Anne Cools - Google Search
Anne Cools' Website
Anne Cools
on False Accusations
EP Nemesis,
Liberal Hedy Fry, the Queen of FALSE ACCUSERS
"Honourable senators know that I have studied a terrible and pernicious
heart of darkness that has developed in our court system, being the use
of
FALSE ACCUSATIONS in civil justice.
This is
the mischief of litigating parties, usually mothers, suddenly within the
context of divorce and within child custody proceedings falsely accusing
the other party, usually fathers, of the sexual abuse of their own
children. ,,,
These
FALSE ALLEGATIONS are often made with the overt or covert complicity
of their lawyers. They are a lethal weapon in the business of parental
alienation. They are a tool for achieving sole custody of children and
creating fatherlessness."
More:
Issues: Cools,
Senator Anne |
|
We are also fortunate to have
Jay Hill, MP
(Prince George – Peace River) here in British Columbia.
“I’m
pushing for equality —both parents should have equal rights and equal
access to their child,”
Hill said. “The courts
seem to start from the premise that somehow fathers aren’t responsible
parents. But both parents are deemed good parents as long as the
marriage lasts; why are they not when the marriage ends?”
More:
Jay's site;
Iissues: Hill, MP Jay. |
We are fortunate in British Columbia to have a
number of pro-family parliamentarians. Of particular
prominence is Paul Forseth,
M.P. - member of the "For the Sake of the Children"
Committee, co-author of the
Dissenting Opinions, and a staunch advocate of pro-family
concerns. Paul has put in many years pushing to have Equal
Parenting issues brought forward to the Canadian Parliament, and
faced fierce opposition from the Prime Minister. Both
Paul and Senator Cools have pressed on to redeem fathers from groups
like the Status of Women (SOW) enduring multiple death
threats from various radical feminist groups while serving on the
Committee. These MPs are tough.
Monday Nov.7th 2005 Dear Equal
Parenting-BC: "Conservatives are committed to
Shared Parenting. The national party “Policy Declaration” that was
passed by delegates at our March 2005 Montreal convention says
clearly that: 65. Shared Parenting: A
Conservative Government will make the necessary changes to the
Divorce Act to ensure that in the event of a marital breakdown, the
Divorce Act will allow both parents and all grandparents to maintain
a meaningful relationship with their children and grandchildren,
unless it is clearly demonstrated not to be in the best interests of
the children.
My Liberal colleagues that served with me on
the Senate-Commons committee that wrote the “For
the Sake of the Children report, admitted that they have
little confidence that their Party will ever enact the needed
amendments to the Divorce Act, that completely fulfills the report
recommendations. The NDP opposed us during the Committee process,
and have never been supportive of dads.
Conservatives are the only hope for fairness
and reasonableness in Divorce and Family Law. I encourage those who
care, to focus their energy where it will help the most, by working
to elect as many Conservatives as possible. I hope that the many who
are frustrated, not become sidetracked into protest, which does
nothing during an election but undercut our ability to make good
things happen. The Liberals and the NDP will say anything in an
election to get a vote, but they will never deliver “shared
parenting”. Every vote that does not go to a Conservative in the
next election is a vote against “shared parenting”.
Paul Forseth MP |
|
Although not from British Columbia, and less familiar
to us, we cannot neglect to recognize the solid support of once Liberal
MP, Rodger Gallaway of
Sarnia. Gallaway and Cools were frequently photographed together
while championing the rights of children to both
NATURAL PARENTS. |
McKenzie & Pedersen, the "Two Robs",
Equal Parenting Bike Trek US 2006, 2007...
Robb MacKenzie Equal Parenting Bike Trek - Google Search;
Robb MacKenzie Equal Parenting Bike Trek - Google Video
Rob Pederson, Equal Parenting - Google Search;
Robert Pederson, Equal Parenting - Google Video
Cycling4Children.com Equal Parenting Bike Trek's photostream
More:
Issues:
McKenzie & Pedersen, the "Two Robs", Equal Parenting Bike Trek US 2006,
2007...;
Issues: Smith,
Ron: DC Family Preservation Rally, Compulsory Drugging of
Children;
Issues:
Compulsory Drugging of Children, Thymerisol; |
Bill Graham, Pedophile Parliamentarian & Defense Minister
Bill Graham, mp - Google Search;
Bill Graham, mp - Google Video
Lawrence Metherel - Google Search
2007-06-19 Liberal MP Bill Graham announces resignation
"In spite of credible revelations dating back to
April 2002 about Bill Graham, a sex addicted bi-sexual sodomizing a 15
year old male prostitute named
Lawrence Metherel, Paul Martin
allowed Graham to remain
Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister - and eventually named him to the
portfolio of Minister of Defense.
"On Sept. 28/2005 a vote was held in Parliament to raise the age of
consent from 14 (one of the lowest age of consents in the world) to 16
(an age which many still consider too low).
"Bill Graham, Paul Martin, and Anne McLellan, on
Sept. 28th, voted against raising the age of consent to 16
More: News:
Graham, Bill: Pedophile Parliamentarian, Defense Minister |
Barbara Kay, National Post
Barbara Kay - Google Search;
Barbara Kay - Google Video
"In
Ontario alone, the names
Cornwall, Prescott, and London became synonymous with "respectable"
pedophile rings -- lawyers, doctors, police officers and Catholic
clergymen -- that for decades preyed on society's most vulnerable boys."
2008-04-22 We're
still ignoring abused straight men, Barbara Kay;
2007-09-26 Forgetting the male victims of child abuse, Barbara Kay
2006-06-14 Welcome to the matriarchy, Barbara Kay;
More....
Issues: Barbara Kay, National Post;
Testimonials: Prior, Byron: Sexual Abuse;
News: Mount Cashel
Orphanage, St. John's NL;
Issues: Boys Of St.
Vincent <Mount Cashel, NL>
News: Southin, Mary: BC Judge
backs Pedophilia, Solicitation of Children for Sexual Activities;
News: Ramsay, Judge David
BC Judge & Pedophile
News: Orr, Judge David:
Protection of Pedophiles in Public Service;
News: Hickman, T. Alex,
NL Judge, alleged Pedophile & Town Tyrant
Testimonials:
Earle, Shane: Mount Cashel Orphange, NL;
Testimonials: Samson,
Pierre: Duplessis Orphans, QU
News: Duplessis
Orphans: Nazi Experiments
Orphange, NL
Issues: Child Trafficking
by Public Officers & Judges;
Issues: Judicial
Freemasonry
Issues: Judicial
Interpretation;
News:
Crowley, Aleister: Luciferian Freemasonry, Homosexual Pedophilia &
Pederasty; |
| |
Shouldn't Web-Site Organization echo the Canadian
"Federal" System of confederating Provinces?
|
|
Canada's "Federal" system as created by
the
British North
America Act, 1867 . It created a new legal entity
called "Canada" as "Federation" of
hitherto independent, pre-existing Provinces and Territories.
Prior to "Confederation" each Province was
autonomous and for many years refused to be ruled by a body of
interlopers in Ottawa. To overcome the the Provinces'
intransigence, the "Confederation" of Canadian
Provinces and Territories had to be created in observance of
the condition that each Province retained it's autonomy
in certain scopes which was ultimately prescribed in the BNA: namely natural resources, language, schooling, health
care, etc. These remained the SOLE jurisdiction of the
Provinces. The newly minted "national government" was given
a complimentary, but relatively short list of functions
(including national defense, defending the borders, immigration, and
establishing a national currency) which
all Provinces by assent delegated to the new entity, the "national" government. The
War of 1812 against the American's vision for "Manifest
Destiny" was well within living memory. The word "federal" refers to the notion that the
Provincial Governments and National Governments operate in discreet
spheres without interference one upon the other. However, due
to ignorance or ill-conceived tolerance, Canadians have suffered
monstrous intrusions of the national government into domains which
are solely of Provincial jurisdiction.
The most aggressive interloper over provincial jurisdiction is
of course the infamous
Pierre Elliott Trudeau, whose Aides now reveal really was a
Communist in purpose, expecting to bring the US and Canada into
a Global Soviet. Since
Trudeau, Ottawa has used their powers of
unlimited taxation and Party Discipline to morph Canada into a
Dictatorship or Oligarchy, and make Parliamentary legislation which routinely
intrude into Provincial matters like natural resources,
language, marriage, schooling, and health care.
They have spent Canadians' tax money as if it was their own to
assert powers over the Provinces they don't Constitutionally possess!
The frequent claim from Ottawa to excuse their chronic bullying of
the Provinces was that Canadians wanted a "strong
central government". At some point it is not inconceivable
to De-Confederate Canada, if necessary, and simple exercise the
Notwithstanding Clause and "opt out" of the
growing Dictatorial Regime in the Courts, Ottawa, and beyond.
The Monarch's historic role of Ombudsman over a potentially tyrannical Parliament
was possible ended in Canada, in Trudeau's
Constitution Act, 1982..
In the event the Prime Minister asserts dictatorial control, Canadians may not
now be able to
Appeal to the Queen, or her Appointee, the
Governor
General of Canada. Recall that since the British Civil War and
Cromwell's
Declaration of the Commonwealth in 1649, the British Monarch has had no
legislative powers. All powers of Legislation have been settled to a duly
elected Parliament as Trustee of these Powers of Legislation. As Head of State, however, the
Constitutional Monarch retains
Powers of Appointment regarding who in Parliament shall form
the Government, and may on Appeal (or by expiry of term) instruct the
Prime Minister to either Form
or Dissolve Parliament. In the latter, an Election would be
called to bring to Canadians the question of who was to form their
Government.
The lessons of history
indicate that dictatorial regimes, such as that which Cromwell faced
and which will soon face Canadians once again, must be taken down by
an armed and bloody rebellion. How foolish Canadians
have been to permit the the evil
Pierre Elliott Trudeau to shrug off his
accountability to the Crown, to who we could Appeal to have him
removed were he to say, commit Canada to annexation by the USSR,
UN, or EU, or invite
our invasion by UN or Chinese troops. We believe that to
confront the abuses the Parliament and the Courts have perpetrated on Canadian
Families, there is good reason for Equal Parenting groups to follow the pattern
by which our Legislatures and national Parliament were set out 1867 in what
never was a "Constitution" but is the
British North America Act.. By design the two
levels of government, Provincial & National / Federal had separate and
discrete funtions. It's probably a good idea for for our
web sites and "Equal Parenting Groups: to pattern themselves along the same lines as the BNA: focusing on
either provincial, or national issues. We need to establish an audible
presence in the form of discussion at the provincial and state legislative
houses. This is probably most effective if new sites limit their scope to
the provincial or state level. (It's easy for a Politician to ignore you
if you are in another Province.) |
|
Invitation to EP Confederation:
We invite other Provinces and States that feel an
affinity with our purpose of making MEETINGS within driving distance
available to alienated Children, Parents & Grandparents every day, seven days a week to create web-pages and
link with us info@equalparenting-bc.ca |
|
|
should
ever be forgot
