"Honourable senators know that I have studied a terrible and
pernicious heart of darkness that has developed in our court
system, being the use of FALSE ACCUSATIONS
in civil justice. This is the mischief of litigating parties,
usually mothers, suddenly within the context of divorce and
within child custody proceedings falsely accusing the other
party, usually fathers, of the sexual abuse of their own
children. ,,, These FALSE ALLEGATIONS
are often made with the overt or covert complicity of their
lawyers. They are a lethal weapon in the business of parental
alienation. They are a tool for achieving sole custody of
children and creating fatherlessness."
EPA
Meetings
are now managed using the Meetup meeting and messaging tools.
Leave a Note at: Equal
Parenting-BC if you wish, with your phone number or Skype ID
and we will try to call you to get you into a Group near you.
Spouses welcome at "Open Meetings", but NCPs only at
"Closed Meetings", please.
With
our buddies at the
Human Rights Tribunal and the Courts we have with NO
STATUTORY BASIS established that
HOMOSEXUAL RIGHTS trump
NATURAL PARENTS' RIGHTS.
By
exercising the Courts in Homosexualist Doctrine, the outcome of
any contest between a homosexual "Legal Parent" wannabe and the
"Natural Parent" has been predetermined, because
we have now established that "NATURAL PARENTS HAVE NO
RIGHTS".Our demands for
Homosexual Marriage is now purging from Canadian Statute the
term "Natural Parent", displacing it with the term "Legal
Parent".
"Natural
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
"Natural
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"
16.10
Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to conform
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal BREACH
OF TRUST"
FYI,
the ideas that the State assigngs
Rights &
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from pre-war
Nazi Germany. Under the British system rights are
not State-given, but God Given.
Buying into the Court's position that what rights
remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same position
that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and Canadian Children
are at birth the property of the Courts.
In
"Women and the Process of Constitutional Reform" McLellan
warns that <Horrors!>
"Provincial
Legislatures may impose a presumption of Joint Custody... and
perpetuate the domination of men over women"
Clyde Hertzman wants to know everything he can about about
your family and children. He and his
Human Early Learning Partnerships program has been
successful in subverting our privacy laws to legalize his
collection, analysis, and reporting of your family's
personal information to global policy makers.
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and they
will likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these
days".
This is completely FALSE. The Judges are
Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT
CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
1649, only
PARLIAMENT has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was only
observed and documented by individuals sent out by the newly
Norman Crown after the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the laws
and customs of the various peoples of Britain.. This was
done with a view to aggregate existing customs which may vary
across the land, into a unified body of Laws. The
Authority quoted by the Commoners in their administration of
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
Bible and
principles of
Danelaw
The process of documentation took only a
couple of hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body of
Law which was historical, popular, and has served in the
intervening centuries as a Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
Arnie Hein is embarking on a cross-Canada cycle to raise
awareness regarding the Father being stripped of
the family by the Family Court System. He is seeking fairness.
" I
want my kids back, at least half the time. I want this law that
removes children from their fathers - and fathers from their
children -to change. I am cycling across Canada to raise
awareness of this problem.
I need other fathers to know they are not alone. I want to unify
the men and children abused by this Family Court System. It is
important that the general public becomes aware of this problem.
"
"Anyone who knows anything of
history knows that great social
changes are impossible without
feminine upheaval. Social
progress can be measured exactly
by the social position of the
fair sex, the ugly ones
included."
-- Karl
Marx
For
us, of course, it is not Parliament that needs to be "Blown Up" but the
Star Chamber and the back-door Courtrooms
of
these unelected, Evil and treacherous
Activist Judges.
"The most
merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant
members is to kill it.",
Margaret Sanger,
Women
and
the New Race (Eugenics Publ. Co., 1920, 1923)
On blacks, immigrants and
indigents: "...human weeds,' 'reckless breeders,'
'spawning... human beings who never should have been born." Margaret
Sanger,
Pivot
of Civilization, referring to
immigrants and poor people
On sterilization & racial
purification: Sanger believed that, for the purpose of racial
"purification," couples should be rewarded who chose
sterilization. Birth Control in America, The Career of
Margaret Sanger,
by
David Kennedy, p. 117, quoting a 1923 Sanger speech.
On the right of married couples
to bear children: Couples should be required to submit
applications to have a child, she wrote in her
"Plan
for Peace." Birth Control Review, April 1932
On the purpose of birth
control: The purpose in promoting birth control was "to
create a race of
thoroughbreds,"
she wrote in the Birth Control Review, Nov. 1921 (p. 2)
See
Eugenics
On the rights of the
handicapped and mentally ill, and racial minorities: "More
children
from
the fit, less from the unfit -- that is the chief aim of birth
control." Birth Control Review, May 1919, p. 12
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.
Margaret
Sanger, 
