"Honourable senators know that I have studied a terrible and
pernicious heart of darkness that has developed in our court
system, being the use of FALSE ACCUSATIONS
in civil justice. This is the mischief of litigating parties,
usually mothers, suddenly within the context of divorce and
within child custody proceedings falsely accusing the other
party, usually fathers, of the sexual abuse of their own
children. ,,, These FALSE ALLEGATIONS
are often made with the overt or covert complicity of their
lawyers. They are a lethal weapon in the business of parental
alienation. They are a tool for achieving sole custody of
children and creating fatherlessness."
EPA
Meetings
are now managed using the Meetup meeting and messaging tools.
Leave a Note at: Equal
Parenting-BC if you wish, with your phone number or Skype ID
and we will try to call you to get you into a Group near you.
Spouses welcome at "Open Meetings", but NCPs only at
"Closed Meetings", please.
With
our buddies at the
Human Rights Tribunal and the Courts we have with NO
STATUTORY BASIS established that
HOMOSEXUAL RIGHTS trump
NATURAL PARENTS' RIGHTS.
By
exercising the Courts in Homosexualist Doctrine, the outcome of
any contest between a homosexual "Legal Parent" wannabe and the
"Natural Parent" has been predetermined, because
we have now established that "NATURAL PARENTS HAVE NO
RIGHTS".Our demands for
Homosexual Marriage is now purging from Canadian Statute the
term "Natural Parent", displacing it with the term "Legal
Parent".
Resistance
is Futile. We Judges, Lawyers,
Social Workers, and Teachers will decide who will be your
LEGAL PARENTS are. We have
our lackeys in the federal Liberals (Irwin Cotler) announcing
Buying into the Court's
position that what rights remain are Children's Rights, is
buying into
the same position that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and
Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.
With barely four years of legal practice under her belt (none of
it in the Courtroom apparently) it's hard to think of a better example
of how
Affirmative Action has
done damage to the Canadian Courts and
Public Service than the case of
Beverly McLachlin.
Breach of trust by public officer
122.
Every official
who, in connection with the duties
of his office, commits fraud or a
breach of trust is guilty of an
indictable offence
and liable to
imprisonment for a term not
exceeding five years, whether or not
the fraud or breach of
trust would be an offence if it were
committed in relation to a private
person.
"The
topic assigned to me this morning is
"Paradigm Shifts in Law and Changing
Philosophical Perspectives."
This assignment requires a study of
how the gigantic strides in other fields of human knowledge have
affected and continue to affect law in general and judicial doctrines in
particular....
"Let
me begin with
the well-known caveat that,
traditionally. laws and judicial
decisions are territorial in scope
and are binding only within the
country of the issuing authority.
This concept flows from the
centuries-old view that sovereignty
is absolute within a state's
boundary.However. the advances of
science, the cross-pollination of
technology, and the realities of our
ever-shrinking world have gradually
assaulted this doctrine.
A
new paradigm has emerged. demanding
the universalization of laws and of
the judicial rulings interpreting
them....
<Who's demanding this
universalization? The Judges
only!!!?>
"Verily.
issues concerning diverse subjects like
international trade. banking, intellectual property, immigration, human
rights. human dignity and criminal law enforcement have built up a
burgeoning literature on the subject of
judicial globalization. One of
the leading academics in this field.
Professor Anne-Marie Slaughter of
Harvard Law School, says that
modern judges should "see one
another not only as servants or even representatives of it particular
government or party, but as fellow professionals in a profession that
transcends national borders.
...
<TREASON!!!!!>
Judicial globalization, sometimes referred to as
''World
Constitutionalism"
or more simply as
"international judicial cooperation".
is
necessitated by the basic similarities of issues facing many courts all
over the world at present."
"Anyone who knows anything of
history knows that great social
changes are impossible without
feminine upheaval. Social
progress can be measured exactly
by the social position of the
fair sex, the ugly ones
included."
-- Karl
Marx
The
case law preferred by Pound and his followers allowed them to
slip out from under the constraints of the timeless and
universal precepts foundational to the Common Law. Case law
<claim the Judges> allows judges to “make law.” One of Pound’s
followers, <former>
Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes, made this
amazing statement: “We are under
a constitution, but the constitution is what we <Judges> say it
is.”
"For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the
political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my
encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the
inordinate influence they claim we wield over American
political and economic institutions.
Some even believe we are
part of a secret C
abal
working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing
my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others
around the world to build a more integrated global political and
economic structure – one world, if you will.
If that’s the charge, I STAND
GUILTY, and I AM PROUD OF IT",
David Rockefeller, of
Standard Oil,
Chase Manhattan Banksand
the
Council on Foreign Relations (one of the main
headquarters of the World Government proponents) in "Memoirs"
Random House, 2002.
A pretty clear objective of
Globalization is to
geographically
separate populations from the materials & products they consume. This
is true even of Critical Resources. What
EU
populations used to create locally they are now
required to shut down local production and become
dependant on foreign imports to survive, all the while
creating greater and greater dependency on the "Middlemen"
administrators and Oil-based transportation methods.
Many in the Alternative Energies report their
efforts to get "off the grid" and become independent of
Oil have been intentionally frustrated. FYI,
here's a couple of links given us as
Energy Alternatives to Oil. ...
Dr. Robert Bussard's Fusion Breakthrough;
EMC2 Fusion Development
Corporation
What happens as
Banking goes Global? There is constant talk of
globalizing the currencies and Stock Exchanges.
See the
Euro and the
Amero. What happens to the democratic process
and accountability of our Legislators to the Electorate
if we lose autonomy even over our own currency and
interest rates? This is another reason for finding
out why crimes of
Treason aren't being prosecuted, and demand
prosecution of those who work on forfeiting our Canadian
property & Sovereignty to foreigners. It's
too late to get
Trudeau.
Mulroney showed Canadians it was just too expensive
to prosecute a living Prime Minister for Crimes
committed in office because he was protected by the
<doctrine of ??>.. See also
Fabian
Socialism
Amero, Debut of the amero;
"The People's Republic
of China, long lauded by America's enemies as
the world's next economic power, will be the
country that will force the creation of the
North American Union' (NAU). ...
The billions of dollars China has invested in
the flagging American economy will be worthless.
They will have to negotiate the exchange rate to
the new Amero. This will then force the creation
of the North American Union
"The
story went on to say that the US Government has
intentionally overspent itself for the purpose
of irreversibly Bankrupting the country. The
idea is that they will drive the country into
economic failure, then when millions of
Americans are panicking at the prospect, offer
them a solution of merging the three countries
as "the only possible way" to avoid losing
everything. <Remember socialist
Trudeau's unbridled spending? This
writer said then, it was with purpose.>
...
They will force Canada into the merger by
telling them the US currency they hold and rely
upon will be worthless and the only way Canada
can even hope to salvage any of the funds is to
join the NAU. ...
They will sell it to the Mexican people by
saying it will instantly improve their
buying-power and quality of life."
On
the day the North American Monetary Union is
created--perhaps on
January 1, 2010
-
Canada,
the United States, and Mexico will replace their
national currencies with the amero.
On that day, all American
dollar notes and coins will be exchanged at the
rate of one US dollar for one amero (). Canadian
and Mexican currencies will be exchanged at
rates
that leave unchanged their nations'
competitiveness
and wealth. In all three
countries, the prices of goods and services,
wages, assets, and liabilities will be
simultaneously converted into ameros at the
rates at which currency notes are exchanged.
At the same time, the national central banks of
the three countries will be replaced by the
North American Central Bank. The operations of
that bank will be governed by a constitution
like that of the European Central Bank, which
makes it responsible solely for maintaining
price stability. It is not required to pursue
full employment or maintain certain exchange
rates. Its personnel policies will be free from
political influences, in particular those
arising out of partisan national politics in
member countries.
"Runner-Up: The 2001 Donner
Prize:
The Charter of Rights has transformed Canadian politics. The
Supreme Court has used the Charter to change government
policy on an ever-expanding list of controversial
issues—abortion, aboriginal rights, gay rights,
bilingualism, criminal law enforcement and prisoner-voting.
The Court has made itself the second <???!> most powerful
institution in Canadian politics after the Federal Cabinet.
"
"Morton
and Knopff demonstrate that the Court is not so much the
cause as the means by which the Charter Revolution has been
achieved. Behind the judges is a well orchestrated network
of state-funded interest groups that use litigation and the
media to achieve what they can't win through democratic
elections."
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.