"Natural
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
"Natural
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage
bill"
16.10 Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to
conform
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal
BREACH OF TRUST"
FYI,
the ideas that the State assigns
Rights &
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from
pre-war Nazi Germany. Under the British system
rights are not State-given, but God Given.
Buying into the Court's position that what
rights remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same
position that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and
Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.
In
"Women and the Process of Constitutional Reform"
McLellan warns that <Horrors!>
"Provincial
Legislatures may impose a presumption of Joint Custody...
and perpetuate the domination of men over women"
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and
they will likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these
days".
This is completely FALSE. The Judges
are Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT
CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
1649, only
PARLIAMENT has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was
only observed and documented by individuals sent out by the
newly Norman Crown after the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the
laws and customs of the various peoples of Britain..
This was done with a view to aggregate existing customs
which may vary across the land, into a unified body of
Laws. The Authority quoted by the Commoners in their
administration of
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
Bible and
principles of
Danelaw
The process of documentation took only a
couple of hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body
of Law which was historical, popular, and has served in the
intervening centuries as a Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
Instead their position to promote the
"rights" of a "Parent" in the widest sense of the
word, making NO distinction between
NATURAL PARENTS and
wannaabe
Legal Parents. They have bowed to
University of
Victoria's assertion that the SCC's
Trociuk
Decision
"endorses a Heterosexual View of the Family and must be
ignored", legitimizing the ongoing
Child
Trafficking by the State which views
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in
the lucrative Child
Adoption Market They refuse to be hampered by prior
obligations to that pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can
Veto an Adoption.
It appears that many
"Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United
Nations and Liberal
Irwin Cotler's assertion that the
Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent
has "NO RIGHTS",
making the State, not the Natural
Parents the Protector of the Child..
Without Cause or
Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!
"In spite of credible revelations dating back to April 2002
about Bill Graham, a sex addicted bi-sexual sodomizing a 15
year old male prostitute named
Lawrence Metherel,
Paul Martin allowed Graham to remain
Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister - and eventually named
him to the portfolio of Minister of Defense.
"On Sept. 28/2005 a vote was held in Parliament to raise the
age of consent from 14 (one of the lowest age of consents in
the world) to 16 (an age which many still consider too low).
"Bill Graham, Paul Martin, and Anne McLellan, on Sept. 28th,
voted against raising the age of consent to 16
"The Family Courts
are <generally> a bunch of second rate hangers-on
... build each other's businesses through
referrals...Family Law is a <parasitic> self-sustaining
Industry"
Habeas
Corpus : "literally, "you
may have the body". A Habeas
Corpus is a legal writ that protects an individual against arbitrary
imprisonment by requiring that any person arrested be brought before
a court for formal charge. If the charge is considered to be valid,
the person must submit to trial; if not, the person goes free. When
the law is suspended, then individuals can be imprisoned
indefinitely and without charge."
.....
Skeletons in the Closet, a film drawn from the dramatized lives
of families living with a protected
Pedophile and the mental
illness it may create when a loving, faithful, Victim keeps the
Secret. This is shockingly
common. The Secret is their Power -
BREAK IT!
(You would be well advised to stay away from the Public Servant.)
Anti-Depressants, Zyprexa: Canadian experiments in Drug
Induced Suicide
This young woman's Cause of Death was written
up as a "Drug Overdose". This is the term they used for
this woman who had drunk alcohol while on Antidepressants.
Our
position is to go to
Meetings
and stay away from
psychoactive and
psychotropic drugs because of their stupefying effect and
their arrest of any remedial actions you may take to improve
your life and the lives of your family members..
Psychiatry is well known to be completely
ineffective. Once you start taking a Psychiatrists' pills,
however it is also known that you will probably become their
Patient For Life.
Anti-Depressants used to cause spontaneous
abortion of children conceived in Psychiatric Hospitals
For reasons we don't understand, a
significant part of the Psychiatric community considers sexual
activity a healing activity for their patients regardless of
their marriage status. They are known to provide their
patients with space and opportunity to seek "sexual healing"
with other patients in the Psychiatric Ward..
By keeping their female patients doped with
an Anti-Depressant with the known side effect of
Spontaneous Abortion, the existence of children conceived
and aborted under their care are never reported.
"Incest isn't Damaging. THINKING Incest
is damaging is what's damaging", says BC Psychiatrist
"Incest isn't Damaging. THINKING Incest is damaging is
what's damaging". So says the Doctor in Charge at
Surrey Memorial Hospital. He may have considered his
surname to be an omen of his phallic destiny.
Dr.
<May> appeared to be Indian. His philosophy sounded Indian
in that he refused to talk about Reality as something concrete
as a Westerner would, but insisted Reality is very fluid and
something we create by our thoughts.
Also under
Dr. <May>'s care at the time was a beautiful
Indian girl who was being chronically incested by her father and
three brothers. She hated living at home and was being
treated at Surrey Memorial for
Suicidal Ideation. She felt she had no way out.
We feel that Dr. <May>'s advice that
"Incest isn't Damaging" encouraged this girl to accept
her position as a sub-class of sexual slaves, which although
convenient for him, and familiar to his countrymen, we as
Canadians must reject.
FYI, We're told by a PhD Biochemist that Lawyers and Insurance
Companies over the last
couple of decades have
put
intense pressure on
Ontario Doctors that they owe their patients no "Duty
of Care". In recent years, Ontario Doctors have
accepted the will of the Insurance Companies and implemented
this into their Society.
Byron
Prior was before Judge David Orr without the benefit of a Jury.
Although six mental health
professionals in an out-of-province Assessment had described him as suffering from post-tramatic
stress, and NOT delusional, Judge Orr sent Byron from the Courtroom to
Newfoundland's Waterford Hospital where his wife
Dr. Dena Orr treats patients. The
Waterford is also
where the sexually abused boys from the
Mount Cashel Orphanage
were sent from time to time.
Mount Cashel provided
the storyline for the
"Boys of St. Vincent" Biopic.
Byron says he protested his being assessed by
his Judges' wife, but
Dr. Dena Orr insisted her professionalism was sufficient to
permit her to assess Byron.
Assessment, of course
determines a patients treatment, medications, and the Conditions
of Release.
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and they
will likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these days".
This is completely FALSE. The Judges are
Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT
CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
1649, only PARLIAMENT has
the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was only
observed and documented by individuals sent out by the newly
Norman Crown after the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the laws
and customs of the various peoples of Britain.. This was done with a view to aggregate
existing customs which may vary across the land, into a unified
body of Laws.
The Authority quoted by the Commoners in their administration of
Common Law
were frequently direct quotations from the
Bible and
principles of
Danelaw
The process of documentation took
only a couple of hundred years, and the product was a STATIC
body of Law which was historical, popular, and has served in the
intervening centuries as a Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for
"Fairness".
It does NOT change.
He describes an environment of obligatory capitulation at Health
Canada to the lawyers of drug companies and of the
insurance companies providing medical malpractice
insurance to MDs.
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.
