
Issues Area Home
Issues Summaries Abortion Veto for Dads ACTA = Anti-Counterfeiting Surveilance Adoption Veto for Dads Adopted Children Disallowed NPs Affirmative Action Age Of Consent Anti-Depressants, Drug Induced Suicide Battered Woman Syndrome BC Vital Statistics Act Misandry BC Legislature MUST Big Brother, Micro-Management Bill C-22 Best interests of the Child Birth Registration - Paternity Fraud Birth Registration - Paternity Denied Breach of Trust "Case Law" is NOT Law CCA Wood and Playgrounds Child Support Tables / SOW Fraud Child Trafficking by Public Officers Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges Compulsory Drugging of Children, Thymerisol Corren Agreement Court Ordered Sexism Credit Crisis, Currency Replacment Custody Orders not Enforced Debtor's Prison Reinstituted Day Care Universal Deadbeat Dads Disabled parents DISS = Divorce Initiated Suicide Syndrome Domestic Violence Propaganda Division of Assets Enticement Seduction Ex Parte Orders False Accusations Father Hatred Propaganda Fatherlessness, State Imposed Federal Reserve / Fiat Currency Feminism = Socialism = Nazism Fitness Test for Natural Parents in Divorce Fitness Test for Students: "Transitions" FMEP = Family Maintenance Enforcement Forgiveness is NOT Compulsory Freedom of Speech Friendly Parent Rule, Max. Contact Fundamental Justice Globalism is Treason Global Warming Fraud "Climategate" Habeus Corpus Abandoned "Hate Crime" Speech Police Homofacism Homosexual Activism Homosexual Marriage "Human Rights” Commissions in Canada Human Trafficking Imputed Income Inheritance Theft: Grey & Black Widow Judicial Activism is Breach of Trust Judicial Falsification of Court Transcripts Judicial Freemasonry is Racketeering Judicial Globalization is Treason Judicial Interpretation Kinship Families & Grandparents raising Children Law Societies' Self Regulation, Corruption Lawyers Lying in Court Legal Abuse Syndrome Letters to MP Letters to MLA Letters to Editor Malicious Mother Syndrome Malicious Prosecution MCF = Ministry Children & Families Misandry, Hatred of Males Money as Debt / Money Masters Move Aways Narcissism Natiional Sovreignity Natural Parents Rights Eliminated, SSM NAU = North American Union No Fault Divorce NCR = Not Criminally Responsible Parliament MUST Parental Alienation Parental Kidnapping Parenting Time Presumption Passport & DL Removal Pedophiles Fear Dads!! Pedophiles Fear Dads New Pedophiles in Public Service Petitions Poofy Judges Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Protestant Revolution, BBC Sexual Abuse by a Public Officer Shadow Government Sole Custody is Child Abuse Special Prosecutors for Homosexuals, Judges Star Chamber's Secret Overlords SOW = Status of Women, KILL IT!!!! Stockholm Syndrome Paradigm Shift Straw Man Redemption, Free Man Supremacy of Parliament Target Legislation Teachers displacing Parents Teachers Seducing Students Tracts and Flyers "Women's Shelters" Lesbian Gulags |
|






Albrecht, Katherine : RFID Spychips Annett, Kevin: Child Trafficking in Beautiful BC Asher, Jeffrey Baskerville, Stephen: "Taken .. Custody Baxter, Dorian: Canada Courtwatch BC Conservatives Beck, Glenn Beck: World Government Bennett, Richard: Purpose Driven & Catholicism Blick, Edward: Global Warming & Marxism Blumner,Court Ordered Sexism Boys of St. Vincent <Mount Cashel>, NL Burrows, Lynette: Homo Adoption Carley, Dr. Rebecca: Vaccinations Carr, William Guy: Pawns in the Game Christie, Doug: Freedom of Speech, Assembly Chopra, Dr. Shiv: Health Canada Coulter, Ann: Free Speech Cools, Senator Anne: Lying Lawyers Coffman, Dr. Michael: Global Warming Coleman, John: Global Warming Fraud Conspiracy of Silence, Boystown Pedophiles Cromwell, Oliver: Supremacy / Parliament Cuddy, Dennis L. Cumbey, Constance : New Age Nazism Dodd, Norman: NWO Fabian Socialists Dutton, Don: RADAR, "Rethinking DV" EP-Australia Federer, Bill: Endang'd Speeches, Quran Farrell, Warren: Why Men Earn More Fischer, Greg: Family Preservation Festival Fogal, Connie: No NAU Forseth, MP Paul: FTSOTC Panelist Fromm, Paul: Free Speech, CAFE FTSOTC 48 Recom's Gage, Richard: Architects & Engineers 9/11 Gairdner William Galloway, Roger: FTSOTC Panelist Geldof, Sir Bob: The Love.. Gerrish, Brian: EU's "Common Purpose" Griffin, G. Edward: Fed Reserve Grignon, Paul: "Money As Debt" Gunderson, Ted: FBI Haeck, Lisa: Sexual Abuse Haines, Bruce, QC: Justice Review Hiebert, MP Russ: Human Rights Commission Hill, MP Jay: EP Legislation Howse, Torm "In a Small Town" Pedophile Boy Scouts Iserbyt, Charlotte: Dumbing Down Jones, Alex Kay, Barbara, National Post Kennedy, John F: targeted for Assassination in 1963 Kernberg, Dr. Otto: Personality Disorder Kruk, Edward: Child Custody Leslie, Sarah: "Pied Pipers of Purpose" LInde, Carey Lively, Scott: "Pink Swastika" Luther, Martin: "Sola Scriptura" Macdonald, Peter: TAXCAP Martin, Malachi: Globalization, Occult McManus, John: Stopping NAU McKay, Dr. Marty McLean, Candis MacKenzie, Rob: "Paul Revere Ride", EP Trek 2006 McQuaid, Robert: Fix Children's Aide Society, CAS Millar, David Hinton , Betty: Status of Women's "Hit List" Mills, Dennis: Former MP Targetted by Homsexuals Monckton, Lord Christopher Monarchy, David Starkey Monteith, Dr. Stanley: Tax Exempt Foundations Nash, Dave: Cross Canada Run Nazanin: Persian Beauty for a Free Iran Neufeld, Gordon: Hold - Kids Nicolosi, Joseph: Treatment of Homosexuality O'Connor, Matt: Original F4J-UK PAFE = Planetary Alliance for Fathers in Exile Palin, Sarah Paul, Dr. Ron: Sound Money Peck, Dr. Scott: "People of the Lie" Pedersen, Rob: EP Bike Trek US, 2007 Pellman, Adrian, LLB: Judicial Activism Perloff, James: Shadows of Power Phenomenon: The Lost Archives Pizzey, Erin: Women's Shelter Scam Plywood Man, NWT Quigley, Carroll: Banking, Globalization Rhodes, Carol: Friend.Court = Enemy. Family Riplinger, Gail: Luciferian Bibles Roberts, Carey Roberts, Elise Roscoe, Peter: Judicial Bigotry Russo, Aaron: NAU, CFR, Rockefellers Ruppert, Michael C Saburido, Jacqueline: Don't Drink Sacks. Glenn Secret Files of the Inquisition Schlafly, Phyllis: Global Governance Simons, Frank: Courts From Hell Schafer, Nancy: Child Trafficking at CPS Simpson, Kari: Road Kill Radio Smith, Ron: DC Rally, Drugging of Children Soever, Alar Sodhi, Eeva Somerville, Margaret:“Same-Sex Marriage” Stopps, Gordon Vs Just Ladies, BCHRT Stormer, John: Betrayed .. Bench Story, Christopher: "Perestroika Dec. Sutton, Anhony: Wall Street & Hitler Taylor, Captain Tony: F4J-US "Fatherless Day" Trociuk Darrell, BC Birth Registration Tyndale, William, "God's Outlaw", RIP 1536 V for Vendetta / Guy Fawkes the Hero Vellacott, MP Maurice Ventura, Jesse: Conspiracy Theory Vieira, Dr. Edwin: Fiat Empire Wagener, William Warren, Elizabeth: Collapse Middle Class Watson, Paul: EU's Nazi Origins William III & Mary II: "Bill of Rights" 1689 Wooldridge, Nancy: Canadian Grans Zepezauer, Frank: Feminist Crusades |
|
Let Ex Husbands Be Fathers Perception vs Reality Some Facts... Both Parents Vital Broken Homes, Bleak Future Justice Review Fatherneed Rights of fathers Ignored? |
|
Support one of over 50 class-actions against
unconstitutional 'sole custody' by Indiana Civl Rights
Council
thetruthandjusticefoundation.org
BC Statutory Amendments |
McKenzie & Pedersen, the "Two Robs",
Equal Parenting Bike Trek US 2006, 2007...

Robb MacKenzie Equal Parenting Bike Trek - Google Search;
Robb MacKenzie Equal Parenting Bike Trek - Google Video

Rob Pederson, Equal Parenting - Google Search;
Robert Pederson, Equal Parenting - Google Video

Cycling4Children.com
Equal Parenting Bike Trek's photostream
More:
Issues:
McKenzie & Pedersen, the "Two Robs", Equal Parenting Bike
Trek US 2006, 2007...;
Issues: Smith,
Ron: DC Family Preservation Rally, Compulsory Drugging
of Children;
Issues:
Compulsory Drugging of Children, Thymerisol; |
Beware of the "Parental Rights" IMPOSTER!!!!

"Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights"
Be on the lookout for the "Parent's
Rights" IMPOSTER. Insist on "Natural Parents Only",
please!
It comes as a big surprise to us that
many groups that present themselves as
"Parents Rights" groups REFUSE to defend the
NATURAL PARENT, and
and to demand RESTORATION
of
Natural Parents Rights taken from Canadians in the
Homosexual Marriage
legislation.

Instead their position to promote the
"rights" of a "Parent" in the widest sense of the
word, making NO distinction between
NATURAL PARENTS and
wannaabe
Legal Parents. They have bowed to
University of
Victoria's assertion that the SCC's
Trociuk
Decision
"endorses a Heterosexual View of the Family and must be
ignored", legitimizing the ongoing
Child
Trafficking by the State which views
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in
the lucrative Child
Adoption Market They refuse to be hampered by prior
obligations to that pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can
Veto an Adoption.


It appears that many
"Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United
Nations and Liberal
Irwin Cotler's assertion that the
Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent
has "NO RIGHTS",
making the State, not the Natural
Parents the Protector of the Child..
Without Cause or
Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!
More:
About:
Beware of the IMPOSTER!!!! "Natural Parent's Rights"
Vs "Parent's Rights";
News: Lessard, Hester - Heterosexual view of
Parenthood must be ignored
News: Smith,
Judge Daphne, BCSC, for Child Trafficking;
Issues: Trociuk,
Darrell;
Issues:
Child Trafficking, Canadian;
Testimonials: Rick Fredrickson of Saskatoon |
Bill Graham, Pedophile Parliamentarian & Defense
Minister


Bill Graham, mp - Google Search;
Bill Graham, mp - Google Video
Lawrence Metherel - Google Search
2007-06-19 Liberal MP Bill Graham announces
resignation
"In spite of credible revelations
dating back to April 2002 about Bill Graham, a sex addicted
bi-sexual sodomizing a 15 year old male prostitute named
Lawrence Metherel,
Paul Martin allowed Graham to remain
Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister - and eventually named
him to the portfolio of Minister of Defense.
"On Sept. 28/2005 a vote was held in Parliament to raise the
age of consent from 14 (one of the lowest age of consents in
the world) to 16 (an age which many still consider too low).
"Bill Graham, Paul Martin, and Anne
McLellan, on Sept. 28th, voted against raising the age of
consent to 16


More:
News: Graham,
Bill: Pedophile Parliamentarian, Defense Minister |


















 |
|
We apologize that the
following figures have not been developed for the Province of BC
specifically. We hope to do this over time. We do know,
however that women often move to BC from Alberta and the rest of Canada
to have their divorces done here in BC where the
misandry of the Family Courts will
maximize their powers to destroy their husbands.
Children from fatherless homes account
for:
-
63% of youth suicides. (Source: US Dept.
of Health & Human Services, Bureau of the Census).
-
71% of pregnant teenagers. (Source: US
Dept. of Health & Human Services)
-
90% of all homeless and runaway
children.
-
70% of juveniles in state-operated
institutions come from fatherless homes (Source: U.S. Dept. of
Justice, Special Report, Sept 1988)
-
85% of all children that exhibit
behavioral disorders. (Source: Center for Disease Control).
-
80% of rapists motivated with displaced
anger. (Source: Criminal Justice & Behavior, Vol. 14, p. 403-26,
1978).
-
71% of all high school dropouts.
(Source: National Principals Association Report on the State of High
Schools).
-
75% of all adolescent patients in
chemical abuse centers. (Source: Rainbows for all God's Children).
-
85% of all youths sitting in prisons.
(Source: Fulton Co. Georgia jail populations, Texas Dept. of
Corrections 1992).
Children from fatherless
homes are:
-
11 times more likely to exhibit violent
behavior than children from intact "married" homes.
-
5 times more likely to commit suicide.
-
32 times more likely to runaway.
-
20 times more likely to have behavioral
disorders.
-
14 times more likely to commit rape.
-
9 times more likely to drop out of high
school.
-
10 times more likely to abuse chemical
substances.
-
9 times more likely to end up in
state-operated institutions.
-
20 times more likely to end up in
prison.
"37.9% of
fathers have no access/visitation rights."
(Source: p.6, col.II, para. 6, lines 4 & 5, Census Bureau
P-60, #173, Sept 1991.)
"40% of mothers reported that they had interfered with the
non-custodial father's visitation on at least one occasion, to punish
the ex-spouse." (Source: p. 449, col. II, lines 3-6, (citing
Fulton) Frequency of visitation by Divorced Fathers; Differences in
Reports by Fathers and Mothers. Sanford Braver et al, Am. J. of
Orthopsychiatry, 1991.)
"Overall,
approximately 50% of mothers "see no value in the father's continued
contact with his children...."
(Source: Surviving the Breakup, Joan Kelly & Judith
Wallerstein, p. 125) Only 11% of mothers value their husband's input
when it comes to handling problems with their kids. Teachers & doctors
rated 45%, and close friends & relatives rated %16.(Source: EDK
Associates survey of 500 women for Redbook Magazine. Redbook, November
1994, p. 36)
"The former
spouse (mother) was the greatest obstacle to having more frequent
contact with the children." (Source:
Increasing our understanding of fathers who have infrequent contact with
their children, James Dudley, Family Relations, Vol. 4, p. 281, July
1991.)
"A clear
majority (70%) of fathers felt that they had too little time with their
children." (Source: Visitation and the
Noncustodial Father, Mary Ann Kock & Carol Lowery, Journal of Divorce,
Vol. 8, No. 2, p. 54, Winter 1984.)
"Very few of
the children were satisfied with the amount of contact with their
fathers, after divorce." (Source:
Visitation and the Noncustodial Father, Koch & Lowery, Journal of
Divorce and Remarriage, Vol. 8, No. 2, p. 50, Winter 1984.)
"Feelings of anger towards their former spouses hindered effective
involvement on the part of fathers; angry mothers would sometimes
sabotage father's efforts to visit their children." (Source:
Ahrons and Miller, Am. Journal of Orthopsychiatry, Vol. 63. p. 442, July
1993.)
"Mothers may
prevent visits to retaliate against fathers for problems in their
marital or post-marital relationship."
(Source: Seltzer, Shaeffer & Charing, Journal of Marriage & the Family,
Vol. 51, p. 1015, November 1989.)
In a study: "Visitational
Interference - A National Study" by Ms. J Annette Vanini, M.S.W. and
Edward Nichols, M.S.W., it was found that 77% of non-custodial fathers
are NOT able to "visit" their children, as ordered by the court, as a
result of "visitation interference" perpetuated by the custodial parent.
In other words, non-compliance with court ordered visitation is three
times the problem of non-compliance with court ordered child support and
impacts the children of divorce even more. Originally published Sept.
1992
Child Support
Information from multiple
sources show that only 10% of all non-custodial fathers fit the
"deadbeat dad" category: 90% of the fathers with joint custody paid the
support due. Fathers with visitation rights pay 79.1%; and 44.5% of
those with NO visitation rights still financially support their
children. (Source: Census Bureau report. Series P-23, No. 173).
Additionally, of those not paying support, 66% are not doing so because
they lack the financial resources to pay (Source: GAO report:
GAO/HRD-92-39 FS).
The following is sourced from: Technical Analysis Paper No. 42, U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Income Security
Policy, Authors: Meyer and Garansky.
-
Custodial mothers who receive a support
award: 79.6%
-
Custodial fathers who receive a support
award: 29.9%
-
Non-custodial mothers who totally
default on support: 46.9%
-
Non-custodial fathers who totally
default on support: 26.9%
source:
http://njlaw924.com/id39.html |
|
Judges and their elite
Star
Chamber entrench their power and status to rule over Canadians with
impunity and unbridled
narcissism.
Feminist and Homosexual Activists as Judges effect
their political agenda without the consent of the Canadian demographic.
They with full knowledge and intent (scripted in the sixties & seventies
by their Activist writers) circumvent due democratic process and
knowingly contravene the founding legal constructs of Canada in the BNA
& in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Activist Judges happily
and routinely breach the Trust placed in them by their employer, the
Canadian Taxpayer.
Lawyers routinely Entice into self-destruction and
financial rape vast numbers of families entering their doors.
Because of the Statutory self-regulation of the BC Law Society, we know
of no limiting factor to cap the Activism of the Judiciary other than
prosecuting Judges and Lawyers who exceed the powers granted them by
Statute.
The BC Law Society pimps BC women, and use them as
their hookers. With others (also conspicuously funded by the
Taxpayer), Law Society members instruct women to hook fathers and
families into the Courts and the financial ruin a "Legal Marriage"
entails. Children NEED this threat to their security to be
EXTERMINATED.
Faced with the entrenched Father Hatred and
Affirmative Action of the burgeoning civil service, boys and young men
despair. Having no vision for a Future or a university education,
they become prone to fulfill the Father Hatred prophecies of BC
university's Women's Studies faculties and Feminist Activists. |
|
2005-xx-xx Third
National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect
"Children of single parents were at
higher risk of physical abuse and of all types of neglect and were
overrepresented among seriously injured, moderately injured, and
endangered children. Compared with their counterparts living with both
parents, children in single parent families had:
-
a 77% greater risk of being
harmed by physical abuse (using the stringent Harm Standard) and a
63% greater risk of experiencing any countable physical abuse (using
the Endangerment Standard);
-
an 87% greater risk of being
harmed by physical neglect and a 165% greater risk of experiencing
any countable physical neglect;
-
a 74% greater risk of being
harmed by emotional neglect and a 64% greater risk of experiencing
any countable emotional neglect;
-
a 220% (or more than three
times) greater risk of being educationally neglected;
-
an approximately 80% greater
risk of suffering serious injury or harm from abuse or neglect;
-
an approximately 90% greater
risk of receiving moderate injury or harm as a result of child
maltreatment; and
-
a 120% (or more than two times)
greater risk of being endangered by some type of child abuse or
neglect."
|
|
2006-11-10
Top judges rebuke Tories Federal plan would allow police to help
appoint judiciary - workopolis.com; "Beverley
McLachlin, Canada's Chief Justice, along with a powerful council of
the country's top judges issued an unprecedented rebuke yesterday to
Justice Minister Vic Toews for hatching a plan to arbitrarily change
the way judges are chosen. The Canadian Judicial Council
expressed dismay that Mr. Toews is planning to introduce
"significant
changes to the composition and functioning of the Judicial Advisory
Committees," secret groups which are set up in each region to vet
candidates for the 1,100 federal judgeships across the country.
Chief Justice McLachlin, who chairs the council, urged Mr. Toews to
include the judiciary and key legal bodies in any discussion of
changes to the committee vetting process."
We
need in the very least some kind of JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY ACT
which will look something like::
-
Divide the Law Society into two groups of
Judges and Practicing Lawyers to protect the Lawyers who would
make Cases against Judges. There would be some Law Society
Members who may practice as Barristers, and some as Solicitors,
but a Judge must RETIRE from the Practice of Law and
become unable to affect the Law Society while they act as a
Judge. On removal of a Judge for
Judicial Activism,
the Law Society may deny their return to Practice from
Retirement for specified cause, such as the case made during
an unsuccessful Criminal Charge of
Breach of Trust or Treason.
-
The Judges naturally divide into two bodies,
the Provincial and Federal Judicial Societies to parallel the
Provincial and Federal Courts. Membership in both Judicial
Societies must be precluded. Federal Judges would be tried
by Provincial Judges according to the
JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY ACT, and the Provincial Judges would
be tried by the Federal Judges. They could be tried both
in Tort and in Criminal Court for
Breach of Trust and for
Treason.
-
Make Judicial Appointments for a FIXED TERM
of no more than five years (Jimmy Pattison where are you when we
need you?)
-
Judicial Re-Appointment must meet a Test for
Judicial Re-Appointment which demonstrates the prescribed
Impartiality (that is an Activism Free record.) and Non-Infamy
with the Electorate.
-
Automatic Temporary Suspension Without Pay
for a Judge who is going to Trial in Tort or in Criminal
Court, pending its outcome.
-
Eradication
of
Freemasonry from the Judiciary and Law Societies. Both
are granted special privileges by Parliamentary Statute which
they receive In Trust.. Judicial Candidates and sitting
Judges must be vetted for
Occult
practices resulting in Public Safety concerns such as
Pedophilia.
Pedophilia is an established part of Occult worship
(See
Malachi Martin among others) and is reported to be a
tolerated practice of some high ranking Judges.
-
Trial by Jury of Judges before non-allied and
non-associated Judges, e.g.. Federal
Judges
tried before Provincial Judges, visa versa..
-
NO SPECIAL
PROSECUTORS for Judges or other Public Servants being
tried.
Under the "federal" division of powers in the BNA
(Constitution Act, 1867)) Education falls into the Provincial
domain. A parallel Provincial Statute to amend the licensing
and Suspension of
Teachers
would be necessary to stop the present use of our Schools for
Political Indoctrination by Activists. See also
Four Missions |
|
Do we have any such provision? Who executes
the required actions in the event a Judge has to be removed?
Submit new info on Removal of Judges
Removal of judges from office, Oklahoma
Constitution
(a) In addition to other
methods and causes prescribed by the Constitution and laws,
the judges of any court, exercising judicial power under the
provisions of Article VII, or under any other provision, of
the Constitution of Oklahoma, shall be subject to removal
from office, or to compulsory retirement from office, for
causes herein specified, by proceedings in the Court on the
Judiciary.
(b) Cause for removal from
office shall be: Gross neglect of duty; corruption in
office; habitual drunkenness; commission while in office of
any offense involving moral turpitude;
gross partiality in office;
oppression in office; or other grounds as may be
specified hereafter by the legislature.
(c) Cause for compulsory
retirement from office, with or without compensation, shall
be mental or physical disability preventing the proper
performance of official duty, or incompetence to perform the
duties of the office" |
|
Habeas
Corpus : "literally, "you
may have the body". A Habeas
Corpus is a legal writ that protects an individual against arbitrary
imprisonment by requiring that any person arrested be brought before
a court for formal charge. If the charge is considered to be valid,
the person must submit to trial; if not, the person goes free. When
the law is suspended, then individuals can be imprisoned
indefinitely and without charge."
.....
More,
Glossary of
terms |
|
2006-03-10 The right to abandon your child by Mona Charen;
"This
is one of those moments when you want to grab liberals by the lapels
and demand, "Well, what did you expect?" ... A group called the
National Center for Men has filed a lawsuit they are calling "Roe v.
Wade for Men." ... More than three decades
ago Roe vs. Wade gave women control of their reproductive lives but
nothing in the law changed for men. Women can now have sexual
intimacy without sacrificing reproductive choice. Women now have the
freedom and security to enjoy lovemaking without the fear of forced
procreation. Women now have control of their lives after an
unplanned conception. But men are routinely forced to give up
control, forced to be financially responsible for choices only women
are permitted to make, forced to relinquish reproductive choice as
the price of intimacy."
COMMENT: Roe
V. Wade was a "Femi-Narcissistic" decision, looking after the
interests of the Mother only. The principal established there
established was extrapolated into a Mother's "murder rights"
expressed in minimal sentences when murdering their children.
Equal Parenting eliminates much of this. |
Father dealt difficult hand by the system
"Even last week, when the family court file of
Elaine and Leo Campione was released to the press -- in
significant measure because Mr. Campione didn't oppose the
media's bid to see it .. There is, to be frank, an
underlying perspective of feminist oppression from which all
else springs. .. Women are seen first as victims --
generally of male power and particularly of husband power -- and
presumed to be truth-tellers and good mothers until proven
otherwise. The starting point for men is that they are abusers
and deadbeat dads in the making unless they can prove the
contrary, and if it takes years for them to demonstrate that, oh
well."
|
| |
Fatherneed: Why Father Care Is as Essential as Mother Care
for Your Child
Kyle D. Pruett, M.D.
Research
…shows that kids yearn deeply for dads. Infants in the first
months of life can tell the difference between a mother’s and father’s style of
care. Furthermore, children thrive when they experience those different styles
throughout all the developmental stages of life. Developmental research clearly
shows that children are born with a drive to find and connect to their fathers,
and fathers have the internal capacity, the instinct, to respond. Children and
fathers hunger for each other early, often, and for a very long time. [p. 2]
An infant’s capacity to recognize father care in its own
right so early in life alerts us to how critical connecting to the father is to
the healthy development of the child. And this is only the beginning. Children
often utter their word (or sound) for “father” before their “mother” word, and
no one really knows why. Is it because the mother and child are so close that
the mother does not need a name whereas the slightly more separate father entity
does? By the time kids can walk and talk, they search out their father on their
own. [p. 8]
Infants who have time alone with dad show richer social and
exploratory behavior than children not exposed to such experiences. They smile
more frequently in general, and they more frequently present toys to their dad.
They also spend more time looking at and manipulating objects as part of
heightened exploratory behavior. [p. 20]
Since parenting is largely about solving problems as lovingly
as possible for any given parent-child pair and since we acknowledge that men
and women differ in the ways they solve problems, we can conclude that fathers
and mothers have equal, if slightly different, parenting abilities…”With the
exception of lactation,” writes Michael Lamb “there is no evidence that women
are biologically predisposed to be better parents than men are. Social
convention, not biological imperatives, underlie the traditional division of
parental responsibilities.” [p. 23]
…there are intriguing findings from child development
studies that prove father care is necessary to the developing child from the
first months of life. We already know that human development wastes little time
or energy while promoting its own development, and the observable reality that
infants only weeks old show interest in their father means that father care has
its role in helping babies become fully human. [p. 25]
Here is what we know about the child’s interest in the
father, beginning from the first weeks and months of life: [p. 25-26]
By six weeks of age, infants can distinguish their father’s
voice from their mother’s voice. While a quiet and alert infant will attend more
quickly to mother’s voice, an upset or fretting infant will calm more readily to
the father’s voice.
By eight weeks, infants can anticipate differences in
maternal and paternal handling styles. Pediatrician and researcher Michael
Yogman’s split-screen video studies at Boston Children’s Hospital of the
responses of alert, comfortable infants to the approach of their mother and
father are still disarming twenty years later. When infants were approached by
their mother, they slowed and regulated their heart and respiratory rates,
relaxed their shoulders, and lowered their eyelids (Ahh…Mom). When the father
approached, the infant’s heart and respiratory rates quickened, shoulders
hunched up, and eyes widened and brightened (Dad’s here…party time!).
Toward the end of the first year, infants protest separations
from mother or father less if they have an involved father. In fact, the
infant’s ability to connect with the father delays the onset of separation
protest in general.
Toddlers seek out and seem to join in the father’s more
playful, more robust, less predictable style of play. Boston psychoanalyst James
Herzog finds children of this age seem attuned to and anticipate the disruptive,
stimulating nature of such play.
As Rob Reiner states succinctly in his I Am Your Child
campaign, “The first years last forever.” [p. 41]
Adaptive and Problem-Solving Abilities
Infants who have been well fathered during the first eighteen
to twenty-four months of life are more secure that those who were not in
exploring the world around them, and they do so with vigor and interest. They
tend to be more curious and less hesitant or fearful, especially in the face of
novel or unusual stimuli. The combination of the fathers’ more active play
initiation and his somewhat less immediate support in the face of frustration
promotes adaptive and problem-solving competencies in the child…Research by
Henry Biller and Frank Pederson explores these interesting predilections of
fathers to show that by the time children of involved fathers are ready for
school, they tend to have greater tolerance for stress and frustration… [p.
41-42]
Strengthened Cognitive Capacities
In the early 1960’s psychologist Ellen Bing initiated one of
the first studies ever of the effect on children of time spent with their
fathers. Its findings surprised even the author. Bing found that the amount of
time fathers spend reading to their children is a strong predictor for many
cognitive abilities, particularly of daughters’ high verbal skills. Equally
surprising is the finding that the amount of time mothers spend reading to
children predicts neither daughters’ nor sons’ verbal ability, suggesting that
there is something unique or characteristic about father-daughter reading time.
[p. 43]
Another important investigation, by Norma Radin, compares
preschool children of highly involved dads with preschoolers with less involved
fathers. Radin found that both sons and daughters of the dad-involved group had
higher levels of verbal skills. [p. 43]
Michael Lamb studied a group of preschool children of
positively engaged fathers and recorded more cognitive competence on
standardized intellectual assessments than for children of unengaged or
negatively engaged fathers. Pediatrician Scott Nugent of Boston’s Children’s
Hospital evaluated the degree of paternal engagement in the month following
birth and at one-year follow-up and discovered strong positive effects of that
paternal engagement on the strength of the infants cognitive functioning. [p.
44]
…Father-deprived children seem to have trouble solving the
more complex mathematical and puzzle tasks. (Henry) Biller found a trend among
fathers to spend more energy and time stimulating mathematical thinking in their
sons than in their daughters. Norma Radin found a positive association between
father involvement and their preschool daughters’ competence in mathematics. [p.
45]
Capacity for Attachment
…(Jay) Belsky found that fathers of securely
attached infants (i.e. infants who can tolerate brief separations from their father without
getting too upset or disorganized emotionally) tend to be more extroverted and
agreeable in personality style and behavior than fathers of insecurely connected
infants. [p. 47]
Frank Pedersen found that at one year of age infants whose
fathers provided extensive care in the intermittent absence of the mother show
higher rates of responding to their fathers and more frequent instances of
exploratory and social behavior than children of less engaged fathers. These are
babies who seem to enjoy initiating contact with their father by handing him a
toy or by smiling and vocalizing; they then wait expectantly, confident that
they will get a response from him. These infants smile more frequently at their
father, show higher rated of face-to-face and general visual contact, and
heightened exploratory behavior…Further benefits are seen in these infants’
desire to approach individuals other than their parents and in their competence
in doing so. [p. 47]
…Michael Cox reviewed a large body of research to sort out
the impact of variations in paternal behavior on infant attachment. He concluded
that fathers who are affectionate, have positive attitudes, and spend more time
with their three-month-olds, are more likely to have securely attached infants
at twelve months than fathers who are more negative and distant. [p.47]
Empathy
…it was found that of the various qualities of maternal and
paternal behavior the children were exposed to at age five, the strongest
predictor of a child’s empathic concern for others in adult life was a high
level of paternal child care. [p. 48]
…Sons of fathers who took more responsibility for limit
setting, discipline, and helping their child with personal problems and
schoolwork had significantly higher empathy scores. [p. 48]
Absence of Gender Role Stereotyping
Norma Radin’s study of school behavior outcomes among
preschool kids whose fathers performed 40 percent or more of the in-family child
care showed less gender role stereotyping in the kids’ choices of friends and in
their overall social and behavioral expectations of their peers than children
whose fathers were less involved in their care. [p. 49]
Self-Control
Psychologist Walter Mischel found young children with
positively involved fathering displayed less impulsivity and more self-control,
particularly in unfamiliar social situations than young children with negatively
or uninvolved fathers…In a related study, (Martin Hoffman) found that boys with
strong father identification scored higher on measures of internal control and
conformity to rules; those with weaker feelings of paternal identification had
more trouble with moral judgments and nonconformity. [p. 50]
Educational psychologist Paul Amato evaluated the sense of
self-control in elementary and high school children and found positive paternal
engagement to be related to a whole cluster of healthy outcomes including life
skills, self-esteem, and overall social competence. [p. 51]
Moral Sensitivity
In one of the more highly regarded, scientifically rigorous
outcome studies of the correlation between moral behavior of children and
paternal engagement, psychologists Mosley and Thompson found that positive
paternal engagement, for boys and girls, is closely associated with: a lower
incidence of acting out, disruptive behavior, depression, sadness, and lying;
higher sociability through complying with parents’ wishes, getting along with
others, and being responsible; boys having fewer school behavior problems; and
girls having more cheerful and happy interchanges, greater capacity for positive
self-involvement, and greater willingness to try new things.
These results are especially compelling because it was
statistically possible to isolate the father effects from the mother effects
with unusual clarity. Bottom line: positive father care is associated with more
pro-social, and positive moral behavior overall in boys and girls. [p. 52]
Physical Development
Ross Parke studied how a child’s physical development
responds to involved fathering. Infants’ scores on assessments of intellectual
and motor, or physical, competencies are higher if fathers are actively involved
during the first six months of their child’s life. The father’s tendency to
activate his child in their interactions encourages and supports the child’s
pleasurable discovery of his own body. [p. 53]
Summary
How does involved fatherhood actually go about shaping a
child’s growth and maturation, and what makes it so influential? Father
influences may be especially important precisely because they are influences not
of the mother. A dad begins to enhance his child’s maturation and autonomy by
balancing the powerful pull toward the mother; he does this merely by being an
interesting non-mother partner in his own right. His very differences from the
mother as a physical being – his smells, textures, voice, rhythms, size –
promote an awareness in his child that it is okay to be different and okay to
desire and love the inherently different, the not-mother entities of this world.
A father’s separateness from the mother, in combination with his constancy,
gives the child a safe haven in the storms over autonomy that blow up so
fiercely in the second year of life. [p. 56-57]
Dads offer intriguing and exciting imitative opportunities for safe and loving
social interactions with a not-mother entity. This shores up self-regard and
self-confidence when it matters most, in the early formation of personality.
Fathers also offer older children an opportunity to explore and interact with
the essence of maleness itself and to explore male-female differences. For boys
it fascinates and comforts because the father’s maleness is “the same as, but
still of me,” and for girls it intrigues and excites because it is “different
than, but still of me.” [p. 57]
Fathers promote children’s acceptance of the real world by
emotionally taking them to the mountain, teaching them to climb, showing them
the world, and, over time, showing them the way through and around it. Even when
men serve as primary caregivers, this role stays in their hands, and children
seem to count on them to fulfill that emotional promise to get them, safe and
whole, into the real world beyond their mother’s arms. [p. 57]
“…parenthood is not a contract and you cannot break it. The
law’s attempt to achieve the civil death of a non-custodial parent is foolish and
destructive.” Margaret Mead [p. 102]
Sondra was eight when her parents divorced. Although she feels bad, she thinks
her parents should not fight over who gets more time with her: “Because they
both made me and own me. I belong to both of them, don’t I?” What a clear
statement that children are a relational asset to both their parents and that
they should share and protect this resource even after divorce. [p. 105]
Gatekeeping
A father’s involvement with his children, especially his
young children, when it matters most, is powerfully contingent on the mother’s
attitude toward, and the expectations of, support from him. The National Survey
of Families and Households found that mothers’ characteristics outweighed
fathers’ characteristics with regard to predicting father involvement with their
children! Responsible mothering, by definition, means support of the
father-child bond. [p. 151]
Single Mothers
…all children have fathers; whether they know them or not,
they have them. All children learn eventually the mystery of their own
beginnings. From their own understandings of where babies come from, they know
that they could not be here if there was no father. And so they conclude that
there’s got to be one for them, somewhere. …Kids know the numbers, as is clear
by what five-year-old Jake screamed painfully to his grandmother, who told him
he didn’t have a daddy: “You lie, Gamma, you lie big! It takes two people to
make one.” [p. 158]
The need for a father is so strong in children that they
make one up if they don’t have one. And they spend a lot of energy looking. A
kid will use almost any marginally substitute (sometimes to the mothers alarm).
Useful though these substitutes are, they are never really sufficient. [p. 158]
When it comes to choosing to raise a child without a father,
the statistics are sobering: fatherless kids are more prone to depression than
kids with a father, are twice as likely to be school dropouts, do less well and
are more violent when in school, abuse more drugs, are more criminally active,
try (and succeed at) suicide more often, and are at high risk for becoming
teenage parents… [p. 158]
…Penelope Leach tells it like it is: “Why is it socially
reprehensible for a man to leave a baby fatherless, but courageous, or
admirable, for a women to have a baby whom she knows will be so?” [p. 159]
…we cannot ignore the fact that raising a boy without an
involved father in the home raises the statistical probability of his becoming
violent. Boys in school who are violent are eleven times more likely to be
living without a father. [p. 159]
Fatherneed and Justice
…paternity establishment serves everyone well – child,
father, and mother. The man is subsequently the legal father of his child, with
all the responsibilities and rights of any father, married or not. He can raise
issues of custody and visitation, and he can participate actively in health,
schooling, and residency decisions affecting his child. He is expected to supply
child support and health care insurance, all the things children have a right to
expect from their father. [p. 199]
|