Remember, Remember the 5th of November,
The gunpowder treason and plot, I see no reason
why Gunpowder Treason should ever be forgot

Guy Fawkes thumbnail

    ● EP-BC Home About  Issues & Petitions  TaxCap Testimonials News  Reference Meetings  Fun Stuff Members


Issues Area Home

Issues Summaries
Abortion Veto for Dads
ACTA = Anti-Counterfeiting Surveilance
Adoption Veto for Dads
Adopted Children Disallowed NPs
Affirmative Action
Age Of Consent
Anti-Depressants, Drug Induced Suicide
Battered Woman Syndrome
BC Vital Statistics Act Misandry
BC Legislature MUST
Big Brother, Micro-Management
Bill C-22
Best interests of the Child
Birth Registration - Paternity Fraud
Birth Registration - Paternity Denied
Breach of Trust
"Case Law" is NOT Law
CCA Wood and Playgrounds
Child Support Tables / SOW Fraud
Child Trafficking by Public Officers
Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges
Compulsory Drugging of Children, Thymerisol
Corren Agreement
Court Ordered Sexism
Credit Crisis, Currency Replacment
Custody Orders not Enforced
Debtor's Prison Reinstituted
Day Care Universal
Deadbeat Dads
Disabled parents
DISS = Divorce Initiated Suicide Syndrome
Domestic Violence Propaganda
Division of Assets
Enticement Seduction
Ex Parte Orders
False Accusations
Father Hatred Propaganda
Fatherlessness, State Imposed
Federal Reserve / Fiat Currency
Feminism = Socialism = Nazism
Fitness Test for Natural Parents in Divorce
Fitness Test for Students: "Transitions"
FMEP = Family Maintenance Enforcement
Forgiveness is NOT Compulsory
Freedom of Speech
Friendly Parent Rule, Max. Contact
Fundamental Justice
Globalism is Treason
Global Warming Fraud "Climategate"
Habeus Corpus Abandoned
"Hate Crime" Speech  Police
Homofacism
Homosexual Activism
Homosexual Marriage
"Human Rights” Commissions in Canada
Human Trafficking
Imputed Income
Inheritance Theft: Grey & Black Widow
Judicial Activism is Breach of Trust
Judicial Falsification of Court Transcripts
Judicial Freemasonry is Racketeering
Judicial Globalization is Treason
Judicial Interpretation
Kinship Families & Grandparents raising Children
Law Societies' Self Regulation, Corruption
Lawyers Lying in Court
Legal Abuse Syndrome
Letters to MP
Letters to MLA
Letters to Editor
Malicious Mother Syndrome
Malicious Prosecution
MCF = Ministry Children & Families
Misandry, Hatred of Males
Money as Debt / Money Masters
Move Aways
Narcissism
Natiional Sovreignity
Natural Parents Rights Eliminated, SSM
NAU = North American Union
No Fault Divorce
NCR = Not Criminally Responsible
Parliament MUST
Parental Alienation
Parental Kidnapping
Parenting Time Presumption
Passport & DL Removal
Pedophiles Fear Dads!!
Pedophiles Fear Dads New
Pedophiles in Public Service
Petitions
Poofy Judges
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
Protestant Revolution, BBC
Sexual Abuse by a Public Officer
Shadow Government
Sole Custody is Child Abuse
Special Prosecutors for Homosexuals, Judges
Star Chamber's Secret Overlords
SOW = Status of Women, KILL IT!!!!
Stockholm Syndrome Paradigm Shift
Straw Man Redemption, Free Man
Supremacy of Parliament
Target Legislation
Teachers displacing Parents
Teachers Seducing Students
Tracts and Flyers
"Women's Shelters" Lesbian Gulags

Notable Authorities






Albrecht, Katherine :  RFID Spychips
Annett, Kevin: Child Trafficking in Beautiful BC
Asher, Jeffrey
Baskerville, Stephen: "Taken .. Custody
Baxter, Dorian: Canada Courtwatch
BC Conservatives
Beck, Glenn Beck: World Government
Bennett, Richard: Purpose Driven & Catholicism
Blick, Edward:  Global Warming & Marxism
Blumner,Court Ordered Sexism
Boys of St. Vincent <Mount Cashel>, NL
Burrows, Lynette: Homo Adoption
Carley, Dr. Rebecca: Vaccinations
Carr, William Guy:  Pawns in the Game
Christie, Doug:  Freedom of Speech, Assembly
Chopra, Dr. Shiv: Health Canada
Coulter, Ann: Free Speech
Cools, Senator Anne:  Lying Lawyers
Coffman, Dr. Michael:  Global Warming
Coleman, John:  Global Warming Fraud
Conspiracy of Silence, Boystown Pedophiles
Cromwell, Oliver: Supremacy / Parliament
Cuddy, Dennis L.
Cumbey, Constance :  New Age Nazism
Dodd, Norman:  NWO Fabian Socialists
Dutton, Don:  RADAR, "Rethinking DV"
EP-Australia
Federer, Bill: Endang'd Speeches, Quran
Farrell, Warren:  Why Men Earn More
Fischer, Greg:  Family Preservation Festival
Fogal, Connie:  No NAU
Forseth, MP Paul:  FTSOTC Panelist
Fromm, Paul:  Free Speech, CAFE
FTSOTC 48 Recom's
Gage, Richard: Architects & Engineers 9/11
Gairdner William
Galloway, Roger:   FTSOTC Panelist
Geldof, Sir Bob:  The Love..
Gerrish, Brian:  EU's "Common Purpose"
Griffin, G. Edward:  Fed Reserve
Grignon, Paul:  "Money As Debt"
Gunderson, Ted:  FBI
Haeck, Lisa:  Sexual Abuse
Haines, Bruce, QC: Justice Review
Hiebert, MP Russ:  Human Rights Commission
Hill, MP Jay: EP Legislation
Howse, Torm
"In a Small Town" Pedophile Boy Scouts
Iserbyt, Charlotte: Dumbing Down
Jones, Alex
Kay, Barbara, National Post
Kennedy, John F:  targeted for Assassination in 1963
Kernberg, Dr. Otto: Personality Disorder
Kruk, Edward: Child Custody
Leslie, Sarah: "Pied Pipers of Purpose"
LInde, Carey
Lively, Scott:  "Pink Swastika"
Luther, Martin: "Sola Scriptura"
Macdonald, Peter: TAXCAP
Martin, Malachi: Globalization, Occult
McManus, John:  Stopping NAU
McKay, Dr. Marty
McLean, Candis
MacKenzie, Rob:  "Paul Revere Ride", EP Trek 2006
McQuaid, Robert: Fix Children's Aide Society, CAS
Millar, David
Hinton , Betty:  Status of Women's "Hit List"
Mills, Dennis:  Former MP Targetted by Homsexuals
Monckton, Lord Christopher
Monarchy, David Starkey
Monteith, Dr. Stanley:  Tax Exempt Foundations
Nash, Dave:  Cross Canada Run
Nazanin:  Persian Beauty for a Free Iran
Neufeld, Gordon: Hold - Kids
Nicolosi, Joseph:  Treatment of Homosexuality
O'Connor, Matt: Original F4J-UK
PAFE = Planetary Alliance for Fathers in Exile
Palin, Sarah
Paul, Dr. Ron:  Sound Money
Peck, Dr. Scott: "People of the Lie"
Pedersen, Rob: EP Bike Trek US, 2007
Pellman, Adrian, LLB:  Judicial Activism
Perloff, James: Shadows of Power
Phenomenon: The Lost Archives
Pizzey, Erin: Women's Shelter Scam
Plywood Man, NWT
Quigley, Carroll: Banking, Globalization
Rhodes, Carol: Friend.Court = Enemy. Family
Riplinger, Gail: Luciferian Bibles
Roberts, Carey
Roberts, Elise
Roscoe, Peter:  Judicial Bigotry
Russo, Aaron: NAU, CFR, Rockefellers
Ruppert, Michael C
Saburido, Jacqueline:  Don't Drink
Sacks. Glenn
Secret Files of the Inquisition
Schlafly, Phyllis:  Global Governance
Simons, Frank: Courts From Hell
Schafer, Nancy:  Child Trafficking at CPS
Simpson, Kari:  Road Kill Radio
Smith, Ron:  DC Rally, Drugging of Children
Soever, Alar
Sodhi, Eeva
Somerville, Margaret:“Same-Sex Marriage”
Stopps, Gordon  Vs Just Ladies, BCHRT
Stormer, John:  Betrayed ..  Bench
Story, Christopher:  "Perestroika Dec.
Sutton, Anhony:  Wall Street & Hitler
Taylor, Captain Tony:  F4J-US "Fatherless Day"
Trociuk Darrell, BC Birth Registration
Tyndale, William, "God's Outlaw", RIP 1536
V for Vendetta / Guy Fawkes the Hero
Vellacott, MP Maurice
Ventura, Jesse:  Conspiracy Theory
Vieira, Dr. Edwin:  Fiat Empire
Wagener, William
Warren, Elizabeth: Collapse Middle Class
Watson, Paul:  EU's Nazi  Origins
William III & Mary II:  "Bill of Rights" 1689
Wooldridge, Nancy:  Canadian Grans
Zepezauer, Frank:  Feminist Crusades

Your Articles

Let Ex Husbands Be Fathers
Perception vs Reality
Some Facts...
Both Parents Vital
Broken Homes, Bleak Future
Justice Review
Fatherneed
Rights of fathers Ignored?

Petitions, Class Action

Support one of over 50 class-actions against unconstitutional 'sole custody' by Indiana Civl Rights Council

thetruthandjusticefoundation.org

Support one of over 50 class-actions against unconstitutional 'sole custody' by Indiana Civl Rights Council

BC Statutory Amendments

Liberal Irwin Cotler:  "Natural Parents have NO RIGHTS"

Irwin Cotler, former Liberal "Justice" Minister robbed Canadians of their NATURAL PARENTS' Rights

Irwin Cotler - Google Search;
Irwin Cotler - Google Video

"Natural Parents have NO RIGHTS....  ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....

"Natural Parents' Rights now  gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"

16.10 Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to conform to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal BREACH OF TRUST"

FYI, the ideas that the State grants Rights Responsibilities Citizen is straight from pre-war Nazi Germany.   Under the British system rights are not State-given, but God Given.

Buying into the Court's position that what rights remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same position that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.

More:  News:  Cotler, Irwin:  "Natural Parents have NO RIGHTS...;
News:  European Union;
Issues:  Paul Watson:  Nazi Origins of European Union;;;
Issues: G. Edward  Griffin ;
Issues: Fabian Socialism;

Liberal Anne McLellan says "Joint Custody Perpetuates the domination of men over women"

Former Liberal Justice Minister, Deputy Prime Minister

Anne McLellan , MP - Google Search

In "Women and the Process of Constitutional Reform" McLellan warns that <Horrors!> "Provincial Legislatures may impose a presumption of Joint Custody... and perpetuate the domination of men over women"  

The Liberal Party and Child Sexual Abuse

More:  News:  McLellan , Liberal Anne "Joint Custody Perpetuates the domination of men over women"

Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges and Legal Oligarchy

Chapter VII. The English Common Law. Section 57. The Norman Conquest

A beautiy of British  Common Law is that it is STATIC, and NOT DYNAMIC as these Activist Judges would have you think.

Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and they will likely tell you it is "Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say "Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these days"

This is completely FALSE.  The Judges are Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever.  Since 1649, only PARLIAMENT has the Capacity to make Law.

British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was only observed and documented by individuals sent out by the newly Norman Crown after the Norman Conquest of 1066  to observe and codify the laws and customs of the various peoples of Britain..  This was done with a view to aggregate existing customs which may vary across the land,  into a unified body of Laws.  The Authority quoted by the Commoners in their administration of Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the Bible and principles of Danelaw

The process of documentation took only a couple of hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body of Law which was historical, popular, and has served in the intervening centuries as a Benchmark against which Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".  It does NOT change.

More:   Issues:  Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges and Legal Oligarchy;
Issues:  "Judicial Interpretation" to pervert Statutes of Parliament;
Issues:  Judicial Activism is Breach of Trust;
Issues:  Judicial Globalization is Treason

McKenzie & Pedersen, the "Two Robs",
Equal Parenting Bike Trek US 2006, 2007...

Robb MacKenzie Equal Parenting Bike Trek - Google Search;
Robb MacKenzie Equal Parenting Bike Trek - Google Video

Rob Pederson, Equal Parenting - Google Search;
Robert Pederson, Equal Parenting - Google Video

Cycling4Children.com Equal Parenting Bike Trek's photostream

More:  Issues:  McKenzie & Pedersen, the "Two Robs", Equal Parenting Bike Trek US 2006, 2007...;
Issues:  Smith, Ron:  DC Family Preservation Rally, Compulsory Drugging of Children;
Issues:  Compulsory Drugging of Children, Thymerisol;

Beware of the "Parental Rights" IMPOSTER!!!!

"Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights"

Be on the lookout for the "Parent's Rights" IMPOSTER.  Insist on "Natural Parents Only", please!

It comes as a big surprise to us that many groups that present themselves as "Parents Rights" groups  REFUSE to defend the  NATURAL PARENT, and  and to demand RESTORATION of Natural Parents Rights taken from Canadians in the Homosexual Marriage legislation.

Instead their position to promote the "rights" of  a "Parent" in the widest sense of the word, making NO distinction  between NATURAL PARENTS and wannaabe Legal Parents.  They have bowed to University of Victoria's  assertion that  the SCC's Trociuk Decision "endorses a Heterosexual View of the Family and must be ignored", legitimizing the ongoing Child Trafficking by the State which views Canadian children as State Property and merchandise for  sale in the lucrative Child Adoption Market  They refuse to be hampered by prior obligations to that pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can Veto an Adoption.


It appears that many "Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United Nations and Liberal Irwin Cotler's assertion that the Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent has "NO RIGHTS", making the State, not the Natural Parents the Protector of the Child..

Without Cause or Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!

More:  About:  Beware of the IMPOSTER!!!!  "Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights";
News:  Lessard, Hester - Heterosexual view of Parenthood must be ignored
News:  Smith, Judge Daphne, BCSC, for Child Trafficking;
Issues:  Trociuk, Darrell;
Issues:  Child Trafficking, Canadian;
Testimonials:  Rick Fredrickson of Saskatoon

Bill Graham, Pedophile Parliamentarian & Defense Minister


Bill Graham, mp - Google Search;
Bill Graham, mp - Google Video

Lawrence Metherel - Google Search

2007-06-19  Liberal MP Bill Graham announces resignation

"In spite of credible revelations dating back to April 2002 about Bill Graham, a sex addicted bi-sexual sodomizing a 15 year old male prostitute named Lawrence Metherel, Paul Martin allowed Graham to remain Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister - and eventually named him to the portfolio of Minister of Defense.

"On Sept. 28/2005 a vote was held in Parliament to raise the age of consent from 14 (one of the lowest age of consents in the world) to 16 (an age which many still consider too low).

"Bill Graham, Paul Martin, and Anne McLellan, on Sept. 28th, voted against raising the age of consent to 16

More:  News:  Graham, Bill:  Pedophile Parliamentarian, Defense Minister

















What happens to kids, when their Dads are taken away from them?

We apologize that the following figures have not been developed for the Province of BC specifically.  We hope to do this over time.  We do know, however that women often move to BC from Alberta and the rest of Canada to have their divorces done here in BC where the misandry of the Family Courts will maximize their powers to destroy their husbands.

Children from fatherless homes account for:

  • 63% of youth suicides. (Source: US Dept. of Health & Human Services, Bureau of the Census).

  • 71% of pregnant teenagers. (Source: US Dept. of Health & Human Services)

  • 90% of all homeless and runaway children.

  • 70% of juveniles in state-operated institutions come from fatherless homes (Source: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Special Report, Sept 1988)

  • 85% of all children that exhibit behavioral disorders. (Source: Center for Disease Control).

  • 80% of rapists motivated with displaced anger. (Source: Criminal Justice & Behavior, Vol. 14, p. 403-26, 1978).

  • 71% of all high school dropouts. (Source: National Principals Association Report on the State of High Schools).

  • 75% of all adolescent patients in chemical abuse centers. (Source: Rainbows for all God's Children).

  • 85% of all youths sitting in prisons. (Source: Fulton Co. Georgia jail populations, Texas Dept. of Corrections 1992).

Children from fatherless homes are:

  • 11 times more likely to exhibit violent behavior than children from intact "married" homes.

  • 5 times more likely to commit suicide.

  • 32 times more likely to runaway.

  • 20 times more likely to have behavioral disorders.

  • 14 times more likely to commit rape.

  • 9 times more likely to drop out of high school.

  • 10 times more likely to abuse chemical substances.

  • 9 times more likely to end up in state-operated institutions.

  • 20 times more likely to end up in prison.

"37.9% of fathers have no access/visitation rights." (Source: p.6, col.II, para. 6, lines 4 & 5, Census Bureau P-60, #173, Sept 1991.)

"40% of mothers reported that they had interfered with the non-custodial father's visitation on at least one occasion, to punish the ex-spouse." (Source: p. 449, col. II, lines 3-6, (citing Fulton) Frequency of visitation by Divorced Fathers; Differences in Reports by Fathers and Mothers. Sanford Braver et al, Am. J. of Orthopsychiatry, 1991.)

"Overall, approximately 50% of mothers "see no value in the father's continued contact with his children...." (Source: Surviving the Breakup, Joan Kelly & Judith Wallerstein, p. 125) Only 11% of mothers value their husband's input when it comes to handling problems with their kids. Teachers & doctors rated 45%, and close friends & relatives rated %16.(Source: EDK Associates survey of 500 women for Redbook Magazine. Redbook, November 1994, p. 36)

"The former spouse (mother) was the greatest obstacle to having more frequent contact with the children." (Source: Increasing our understanding of fathers who have infrequent contact with their children, James Dudley, Family Relations, Vol. 4, p. 281, July 1991.)

"A clear majority (70%) of fathers felt that they had too little time with their children." (Source: Visitation and the Noncustodial Father, Mary Ann Kock & Carol Lowery, Journal of Divorce, Vol. 8, No. 2, p. 54, Winter 1984.)

"Very few of the children were satisfied with the amount of contact with their fathers, after divorce." (Source: Visitation and the Noncustodial Father, Koch & Lowery, Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, Vol. 8, No. 2, p. 50, Winter 1984.)

"Feelings of anger towards their former spouses hindered effective involvement on the part of fathers; angry mothers would sometimes sabotage father's efforts to visit their children." (Source: Ahrons and Miller, Am. Journal of Orthopsychiatry, Vol. 63. p. 442, July 1993.)

"Mothers may prevent visits to retaliate against fathers for problems in their marital or post-marital relationship." (Source: Seltzer, Shaeffer & Charing, Journal of Marriage & the Family, Vol. 51, p. 1015, November 1989.)

In a study: "Visitational Interference - A National Study" by Ms. J Annette Vanini, M.S.W. and Edward Nichols, M.S.W., it was found that 77% of non-custodial fathers are NOT able to "visit" their children, as ordered by the court, as a result of "visitation interference" perpetuated by the custodial parent. In other words, non-compliance with court ordered visitation is three times the problem of non-compliance with court ordered child support and impacts the children of divorce even more. Originally published Sept. 1992

Child Support

Information from multiple sources show that only 10% of all non-custodial fathers fit the "deadbeat dad" category: 90% of the fathers with joint custody paid the support due. Fathers with visitation rights pay 79.1%; and 44.5% of those with NO visitation rights still financially support their children. (Source: Census Bureau report. Series P-23, No. 173).

Additionally, of those not paying support, 66% are not doing so because they lack the financial resources to pay (Source: GAO report: GAO/HRD-92-39 FS).

The following is sourced from: Technical Analysis Paper No. 42, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Income Security Policy, Authors: Meyer and Garansky.

  • Custodial mothers who receive a support award: 79.6%

  • Custodial fathers who receive a support award: 29.9%

  • Non-custodial mothers who totally default on support: 46.9%

  • Non-custodial fathers who totally default on support: 26.9%

source:   http://njlaw924.com/id39.html

What happens to Canadians when Judges Drive Dads and Boys into servitude and compliance

Judges and their elite Star Chamber entrench their power and status to rule over Canadians with impunity and unbridled narcissism.

Feminist and Homosexual Activists as Judges effect their political agenda without the consent of the Canadian demographic.  They with full knowledge and intent (scripted in the sixties & seventies by their Activist writers) circumvent due democratic process and knowingly contravene the founding legal constructs of Canada in the BNA & in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.  Activist Judges happily and routinely breach the Trust placed in them by their employer, the Canadian Taxpayer.

Lawyers routinely Entice into self-destruction and financial rape vast numbers of families entering their doors.  Because of the Statutory self-regulation of the BC Law Society, we know of no limiting factor to cap the Activism of the Judiciary other than prosecuting Judges and Lawyers who exceed the powers granted them by Statute.

The BC Law Society pimps BC women, and use them as their hookers.  With others (also conspicuously funded by the Taxpayer),  Law Society members instruct women to hook fathers and families into the Courts and the financial ruin a "Legal Marriage" entails.  Children NEED this threat to their security to be EXTERMINATED.

Faced with the entrenched Father Hatred and Affirmative Action of the burgeoning civil service, boys and young men despair.  Having no vision for a Future or a university education, they become prone to fulfill the Father Hatred prophecies of BC university's Women's Studies faculties and Feminist Activists.

Children Raised in Sole Custody in profoundly greater risk

2005-xx-xx  Third National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect

"Children of single parents were at higher risk of physical abuse and of all types of neglect and were overrepresented among seriously injured, moderately injured, and endangered children. Compared with their counterparts living with both parents, children in single parent families had:

  • a 77% greater risk of being harmed by physical abuse (using the stringent Harm Standard) and a 63% greater risk of experiencing any countable physical abuse (using the Endangerment Standard);

  • an 87% greater risk of being harmed by physical neglect and a 165% greater risk of experiencing any countable physical neglect;

  • a 74% greater risk of being harmed by emotional neglect and a 64% greater risk of experiencing any countable emotional neglect;

  • a 220% (or more than three times) greater risk of being educationally neglected;

  • an approximately 80% greater risk of suffering serious injury or harm from abuse or neglect;

  • an approximately 90% greater risk of receiving moderate injury or harm as a result of child maltreatment; and

  • a 120% (or more than two times) greater risk of being endangered by some type of child abuse or neglect."

Judicial Accountability Act Proposals

2006-11-10  Top judges rebuke Tories Federal plan would allow police to help appoint judiciary - workopolis.com;   "Beverley McLachlin, Canada's Chief Justice, along with a powerful council of the country's top judges issued an unprecedented rebuke yesterday to Justice Minister Vic Toews for hatching a plan to arbitrarily change the way judges are chosen.  The Canadian Judicial Council expressed dismay that Mr. Toews is planning to introduce Guy Fawkes thumbnail"significant changes to the composition and functioning of the Judicial Advisory Committees," secret groups which are set up in each region to vet candidates for the 1,100 federal judgeships across the country.   Chief Justice McLachlin, who chairs the council, urged Mr. Toews to include the judiciary and key legal bodies in any discussion of changes to the committee vetting process."

We need in the very least some kind of JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY ACT which will look something like::

  1. Divide the Law Society into two groups of Judges and Practicing Lawyers to protect the Lawyers who would make Cases against Judges.  There would be some Law Society Members who may practice as Barristers, and some as Solicitors, but a Judge must RETIRE from the Practice of  Law and become unable to affect the Law Society while they act as a Judge.  On removal of a Judge for  Judicial Activism, the Law Society may deny their return to Practice from  Retirement for specified cause, such as the case made during  an unsuccessful Criminal Charge  of  Breach of Trust  or Treason.

  2. The Judges naturally divide into two bodies, the Provincial and Federal Judicial Societies to parallel the Provincial and Federal Courts.  Membership in both Judicial Societies must be precluded.  Federal Judges would be tried by Provincial Judges according to the JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY ACT, and the Provincial Judges would be tried by the Federal Judges.  They could be tried both in Tort and in Criminal Court for Breach of Trust and for Treason.

  3. Make Judicial Appointments for a FIXED TERM of no more than five years (Jimmy Pattison where are you when we need you?)

  4.  Judicial Re-Appointment must meet a Test for Judicial Re-Appointment which demonstrates the prescribed Impartiality (that is an Activism Free record.) and Non-Infamy with the Electorate.

  5. Automatic Temporary Suspension Without Pay for a Judge who is going to Trial  in Tort or in Criminal Court, pending its outcome.

  6. Eradication of Freemasonry from the Judiciary and Law Societies.  Both are granted special privileges by Parliamentary Statute which they receive In Trust..  Judicial Candidates and sitting Judges must be vetted for Occult practices resulting in Public Safety concerns such as Pedophilia.  Pedophilia is an established part of Occult worship  (See Malachi Martin  among others) and is reported to be a tolerated practice of some high ranking Judges.

  7. Trial by Jury of Judges before non-allied and non-associated Judges, e.g.. Federal Judges tried before Provincial Judges, visa versa.. 

  8. NO SPECIAL PROSECUTORS for Judges or other Public Servants being tried.

Under the "federal" division of powers in the BNA (Constitution Act, 1867)) Education falls into the Provincial domain.  A parallel Provincial Statute to amend the licensing  and Suspension of Teachers would be necessary to stop the present use of our Schools for Political Indoctrination by Activists.  See also Four Missions

Removal of Judges

Do we have any such provision?  Who executes the required actions in the event a Judge has to be removed?  Submit new info on Removal of Judges

Removal of judges from office, Oklahoma Constitution

(a) In addition to other methods and causes prescribed by the Constitution and laws, the judges of any court, exercising judicial power under the provisions of Article VII, or under any other provision, of the Constitution of Oklahoma, shall be subject to removal from office, or to compulsory retirement from office, for causes herein specified, by proceedings in the Court on the Judiciary.

(b) Cause for removal from office shall be: Gross neglect of duty; corruption in office; habitual drunkenness; commission while in office of any offense involving moral turpitude; gross partiality in office; oppression in office; or other grounds as may be specified hereafter by the legislature.

(c) Cause for compulsory retirement from office, with or without compensation, shall be mental or physical disability preventing the proper performance of official duty, or incompetence to perform the duties of the office"

Phyllis Schlafly and Stephen Baskerville

On February 14, 2006 Both Phyllis Schlafly and Stephen Baskerville join together in a landmark interview
"War Against The Family".mp3

Phyllis
Schlafly

"The Family Courts are <generally> a bunch of second rate hangers-on   ...  build each other's businesses through referrals...Family Law is a <parasitic> self-sustaining Industry"

Stephen
Baskerville

"Why isn't "Focus on the Family" working for Equal Parenting?

Stephen Baskerville's Home; American Coal. for Fathers and Children

Terminology

Habeas Corpus :  "literally, "you may have the body". A Habeas Corpus is a legal writ that protects an individual against arbitrary imprisonment by requiring that any person arrested be brought before a court for formal charge. If the charge is considered to be valid, the person must submit to trial; if not, the person goes free. When the law is suspended, then individuals can be imprisoned indefinitely and without charge."      ..... 

More, Glossary of terms

2006-03-10  The right to abandon your child by Mona Charen;

"This is one of those moments when you want to grab liberals by the lapels and demand, "Well, what did you expect?" ... A group called the National Center for Men has filed a lawsuit they are calling "Roe v. Wade for Men."   ...   More than three decades ago Roe vs. Wade gave women control of their reproductive lives but nothing in the law changed for men. Women can now have sexual intimacy without sacrificing reproductive choice. Women now have the freedom and security to enjoy lovemaking without the fear of forced procreation. Women now have control of their lives after an unplanned conception. But men are routinely forced to give up control, forced to be financially responsible for choices only women are permitted to make, forced to relinquish reproductive choice as the price of intimacy."

COMMENT:  Roe V. Wade was a "Femi-Narcissistic" decision, looking after the interests of the Mother only.  The principal established there established was extrapolated into a Mother's "murder rights" expressed in minimal sentences when murdering their children.  Equal Parenting eliminates much of this.

Father dealt difficult hand by the system "Even last week, when the family court file of Elaine and Leo Campione was released to the press -- in significant measure because Mr. Campione didn't oppose the media's bid to see it  ..  There is, to be frank, an underlying perspective of feminist oppression from which all else springs.  ..  Women are seen first as victims -- generally of male power and particularly of husband power -- and presumed to be truth-tellers and good mothers until proven otherwise. The starting point for men is that they are abusers and deadbeat dads in the making unless they can prove the contrary, and if it takes years for them to demonstrate that, oh well." 

Fatherneed: Why Father Care Is as Essential as Mother Care for Your Child

Kyle D. Pruett, M.D.


 Research

…shows that kids yearn deeply for dads. Infants in the first months of life can tell the difference between a mother’s and father’s style of care. Furthermore, children thrive when they experience those different styles throughout all the developmental stages of life. Developmental research clearly shows that children are born with a drive to find and connect to their fathers, and fathers have the internal capacity, the instinct, to respond. Children and fathers hunger for each other early, often, and for a very long time. [p. 2]

An infant’s capacity to recognize father care in its own right so early in life alerts us to how critical connecting to the father is to the healthy development of the child. And this is only the beginning. Children often utter their word (or sound) for “father” before their “mother” word, and no one really knows why. Is it because the mother and child are so close that the mother does not need a name whereas the slightly more separate father entity does? By the time kids can walk and talk, they search out their father on their own. [p. 8]

Infants who have time alone with dad show richer social and exploratory behavior than children not exposed to such experiences. They smile more frequently in general, and they more frequently present toys to their dad. They also spend more time looking at and manipulating objects as part of heightened exploratory behavior. [p. 20]

Since parenting is largely about solving problems as lovingly as possible for any given parent-child pair and since we acknowledge that men and women differ in the ways they solve problems, we can conclude that fathers and mothers have equal, if slightly different, parenting abilities…”With the exception of lactation,” writes Michael Lamb “there is no evidence that women are biologically predisposed to be better parents than men are. Social convention, not biological imperatives, underlie the traditional division of parental responsibilities.” [p. 23]

 …there are intriguing findings from child development studies that prove father care is necessary to the developing child from the first months of life. We already know that human development wastes little time or energy while promoting its own development, and the observable reality that infants only weeks old show interest in their father means that father care has its role in helping babies become fully human. [p. 25]

Here is what we know about the child’s interest in the father, beginning from the first weeks and months of life: [p. 25-26]

By six weeks of age, infants can distinguish their father’s voice from their mother’s voice. While a quiet and alert infant will attend more quickly to mother’s voice, an upset or fretting infant will calm more readily to the father’s voice.

By eight weeks, infants can anticipate differences in maternal and paternal handling styles. Pediatrician and researcher Michael Yogman’s split-screen video studies at Boston Children’s Hospital of the responses of alert, comfortable infants to the approach of their mother and father are still disarming twenty years later. When infants were approached by their mother, they slowed and regulated their heart and respiratory rates, relaxed their shoulders, and lowered their eyelids (Ahh…Mom). When the father approached, the infant’s heart and respiratory rates quickened, shoulders hunched up, and eyes widened and brightened (Dad’s here…party time!).

Toward the end of the first year, infants protest separations from mother or father less if they have an involved father. In fact, the infant’s ability to connect with the father delays the onset of separation protest in general.

Toddlers seek out and seem to join in the father’s more playful, more robust, less predictable style of play. Boston psychoanalyst James Herzog finds children of this age seem attuned to and anticipate the disruptive, stimulating nature of such play.

As Rob Reiner states succinctly in his I Am Your Child campaign, “The first years last forever.” [p. 41]

Adaptive and Problem-Solving Abilities

Infants who have been well fathered during the first eighteen to twenty-four months of life are more secure that those who were not in exploring the world around them, and they do so with vigor and interest. They tend to be more curious and less hesitant or fearful, especially in the face of novel or unusual stimuli. The combination of the fathers’ more active play initiation and his somewhat less immediate support in the face of frustration promotes adaptive and problem-solving competencies in the child…Research by Henry Biller and Frank Pederson explores these interesting predilections of fathers to show that by the time children of involved fathers are ready for school, they tend to have greater tolerance for stress and frustration… [p. 41-42]

Strengthened Cognitive Capacities

 In the early 1960’s psychologist Ellen Bing initiated one of the first studies ever of the effect on children of time spent with their fathers. Its findings surprised even the author. Bing found that the amount of time fathers spend reading to their children is a strong predictor for many cognitive abilities, particularly of daughters’ high verbal skills. Equally surprising is the finding that the amount of time mothers spend reading to children predicts neither daughters’ nor sons’ verbal ability, suggesting that there is something unique or characteristic about father-daughter reading time. [p. 43]

Another important investigation, by Norma Radin, compares preschool children of highly involved dads with preschoolers with less involved fathers. Radin found that both sons and daughters of the dad-involved group had higher levels of verbal skills. [p. 43]

Michael Lamb studied a group of preschool children of positively engaged fathers and recorded more cognitive competence on standardized intellectual assessments than for children of unengaged or negatively engaged fathers. Pediatrician Scott Nugent of Boston’s Children’s Hospital evaluated the degree of paternal engagement in the month following birth and at one-year follow-up and discovered strong positive effects of that paternal engagement on the strength of the infants cognitive functioning. [p. 44]

…Father-deprived children seem to have trouble solving the more complex mathematical and puzzle tasks. (Henry) Biller found a trend among fathers to spend more energy and time stimulating mathematical thinking in their sons than in their daughters. Norma Radin found a positive association between father involvement and their preschool daughters’ competence in mathematics. [p. 45]

Capacity for Attachment

…(Jay) Belsky found that fathers of securely attached infants (i.e. infants who can tolerate brief separations from their father without getting too upset or disorganized emotionally) tend to be more extroverted and agreeable in personality style and behavior than fathers of insecurely connected infants. [p. 47]

Frank Pedersen found that at one year of age infants whose fathers provided extensive care in the intermittent absence of the mother show higher rates of responding to their fathers and more frequent instances of exploratory and social behavior than children of less engaged fathers. These are babies who seem to enjoy initiating contact with their father by handing him a toy or by smiling and vocalizing; they then wait expectantly, confident that they will get a response from him. These infants smile more frequently at their father, show higher rated of face-to-face and general visual contact, and heightened exploratory behavior…Further benefits are seen in these infants’ desire to approach individuals other than their parents and in their competence in doing so. [p. 47]

…Michael Cox reviewed a large body of research to sort out the impact of variations in paternal behavior on infant attachment. He concluded that fathers who are affectionate, have positive attitudes, and spend more time with their three-month-olds, are more likely to have securely attached infants at twelve months than fathers who are more negative and distant. [p.47]

Empathy

…it was found that of the various qualities of maternal and paternal behavior the children were exposed to at age five, the strongest predictor of a child’s empathic concern for others in adult life was a high level of paternal child care. [p. 48]

…Sons of fathers who took more responsibility for limit setting, discipline, and helping their child with personal problems and schoolwork had significantly higher empathy scores. [p. 48]

Absence of Gender Role Stereotyping

Norma Radin’s study of school behavior outcomes among preschool kids whose fathers performed 40 percent or more of the in-family child care showed less gender role stereotyping in the kids’ choices of friends and in their overall social and behavioral expectations of their peers than children whose fathers were less involved in their care. [p. 49]

Self-Control

Psychologist Walter Mischel found young children with positively involved fathering displayed less impulsivity and more self-control, particularly in unfamiliar social situations than young children with negatively or uninvolved fathers…In a related study, (Martin Hoffman) found that boys with strong father identification scored higher on measures of internal control and conformity to rules; those with weaker feelings of paternal identification had more trouble with moral judgments and nonconformity. [p. 50]

Educational psychologist Paul Amato evaluated the sense of self-control in elementary and high school children and found positive paternal engagement to be related to a whole cluster of healthy outcomes including life skills, self-esteem, and overall social competence. [p. 51]

Moral Sensitivity

In one of the more highly regarded, scientifically rigorous outcome studies of the correlation between moral behavior of children and paternal engagement, psychologists Mosley and Thompson found that positive paternal engagement, for boys and girls, is closely associated with: a lower incidence of acting out, disruptive behavior, depression, sadness, and lying; higher sociability through complying with parents’ wishes, getting along with others, and being responsible; boys having fewer school behavior problems; and girls having more cheerful and happy interchanges, greater capacity for positive self-involvement, and greater willingness to try new things.

These results are especially compelling because it was statistically possible to isolate the father effects from the mother effects with unusual clarity. Bottom line: positive father care is associated with more pro-social, and positive moral behavior overall in boys and girls. [p. 52]

Physical Development

 Ross Parke studied how a child’s physical development responds to involved fathering. Infants’ scores on assessments of intellectual and motor, or physical, competencies are higher if fathers are actively involved during the first six months of their child’s life. The father’s tendency to activate his child in their interactions encourages and supports the child’s pleasurable discovery of his own body. [p. 53]

Summary

 How does involved fatherhood actually go about shaping a child’s growth and maturation, and what makes it so influential? Father influences may be especially important precisely because they are influences not of the mother. A dad begins to enhance his child’s maturation and autonomy by balancing the powerful pull toward the mother; he does this merely by being an interesting non-mother partner in his own right. His very differences from the mother as a physical being – his smells, textures, voice, rhythms, size – promote an awareness in his child that it is okay to be different and okay to desire and love the inherently different, the not-mother entities of this world. A father’s separateness from the mother, in combination with his constancy, gives the child a safe haven in the storms over autonomy that blow up so fiercely in the second year of life. [p. 56-57]

Dads offer intriguing and exciting imitative opportunities for safe and loving social interactions with a not-mother entity. This shores up self-regard and self-confidence when it matters most, in the early formation of personality. Fathers also offer older children an opportunity to explore and interact with the essence of maleness itself and to explore male-female differences. For boys it fascinates and comforts because the father’s maleness is “the same as, but still of me,” and for girls it intrigues and excites because it is “different than, but still of me.” [p. 57]

Fathers promote children’s acceptance of the real world by emotionally taking them to the mountain, teaching them to climb, showing them the world, and, over time, showing them the way through and around it. Even when men serve as primary caregivers, this role stays in their hands, and children seem to count on them to fulfill that emotional promise to get them, safe and whole, into the real world beyond their mother’s arms. [p. 57]

“…parenthood is not a contract and you cannot break it. The law’s attempt to achieve the civil death of a non-custodial parent is foolish and destructive.” Margaret Mead [p. 102]

Sondra was eight when her parents divorced. Although she feels bad, she thinks her parents should not fight over who gets more time with her: “Because they both made me and own me. I belong to both of them, don’t I?” What a clear statement that children are a relational asset to both their parents and that they should share and protect this resource even after divorce. [p. 105]

Gatekeeping

A father’s involvement with his children, especially his young children, when it matters most, is powerfully contingent on the mother’s attitude toward, and the expectations of, support from him. The National Survey of Families and Households found that mothers’ characteristics outweighed fathers’ characteristics with regard to predicting father involvement with their children! Responsible mothering, by definition, means support of the father-child bond. [p. 151]

Single Mothers

 …all children have fathers; whether they know them or not, they have them. All children learn eventually the mystery of their own beginnings. From their own understandings of where babies come from, they know that they could not be here if there was no father. And so they conclude that there’s got to be one for them, somewhere. …Kids know the numbers, as is clear by what five-year-old Jake screamed painfully to his grandmother, who told him he didn’t have a daddy: “You lie, Gamma, you lie big! It takes two people to make one.” [p. 158]

 The need for a father is so strong in children that they make one up if they don’t have one. And they spend a lot of energy looking. A kid will use almost any marginally substitute (sometimes to the mothers alarm). Useful though these substitutes are, they are never really sufficient. [p. 158]

 When it comes to choosing to raise a child without a father, the statistics are sobering: fatherless kids are more prone to depression than kids with a father, are twice as likely to be school dropouts, do less well and are more violent when in school, abuse more drugs, are more criminally active, try (and succeed at) suicide more often, and are at high risk for becoming teenage parents… [p. 158]

 …Penelope Leach tells it like it is: “Why is it socially reprehensible for a man to leave a baby fatherless, but courageous, or admirable, for a women to have a baby whom she knows will be so?” [p. 159]

 …we cannot ignore the fact that raising a boy without an involved father in the home raises the statistical probability of his becoming violent. Boys in school who are violent are eleven times more likely to be living without a father. [p. 159]

Fatherneed and Justice

 …paternity establishment serves everyone well – child, father, and mother. The man is subsequently the legal father of his child, with all the responsibilities and rights of any father, married or not. He can raise issues of custody and visitation, and he can participate actively in health, schooling, and residency decisions affecting his child. He is expected to supply child support and health care insurance, all the things children have a right to expect from their father. [p. 199]

 

Copyright 2002  equalparenting-bc.ca 

 

        Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages  exercising democratic rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.