Remember, Remember the 5th of November,
The gunpowder treason and plot, I see no reason why Gunpowder Treason should ever be forgot

Activist BC Judge Daphne Smith claims Fathers don't need adoption notice, Canadian Supreme Court in Trociuk says WRONG!!

COMMENT:  If Justice Daphne Smith isn't a Judge in Criminal Breach of Trust, we'd like to know what it takes for a BC Judge to be CHARGED with Breach?.  Oh yeah, in Prince George, at least, it's 25 years of sexual assault while on the BC Bench and the final whistle blowing when a past victim of the Judge sees her daughter about to be sexually assaulted as she was in her youth.  We are calling on the BC Attorney General to pull Justice Daphne Smith off the BC Bench immediately and file criminal charges against her for Criminal Breach of Trust  and in view of the Statutes she's discarded and the SCC decision addressing this question specifically,  charge Daphne Smith also for TREASON.

Madam Justice Daphne Smith is WRONG to extrapolate into the administration of the Adoption Act  the presently UN-Constitutional, illegal practice in BC Birth Certificate registrations of permitting BC Female Parents to declare the BC Male Parents "UNACKNOWLEDGED  by the Mother".  At the stroke of a Mother's pen, any and all Parental Rights of a Father may be expunged in British Columbia.   The Supreme Court of Canada  (SCC) has called this Decision a "no-brainer", ruling in the Trociuk v. British Columbia (Attorney General) that BC's Registration of Live Births Form is a violation of a Natural Father's Charter Rights.  One would expect the practice to be STOPPED immediately following the SCC's Order.  It didn't. 

Instead the Form was amended invite the Mother to appoint anyone she pleases as a Co-Parent. A likely factor was UVic's Homosexualist professor Hester Lessard's campaign following the SCC decision arguing that Trociuk v. British Columbia (Attorney General) must be ignored because it militates against Homosexual Rights, "affirms arcane ideas that biology constitutes parenthood", and (horror of horrors!) legitimizes a disgusting  "heterosexual view of the Family".  

The Co-Parent of course doesn't have to pay Child Support or pay the Mortgage on the home they have just moved into with "Mom".  That is the role of the Natural Father or any man the mother can get sexually involved with for a period of six months or more.  (Take Warning, guys!!) This later addition is thanks to a modification of the Family Relations Act by the BC NDP trying to deal with the debilitating cost of Welfare and Low-Income housing for Single Mothers on the BC economy.  Equal Parenting would have been THE solution for that problem too, but NDP would never affirm a Father's Rights, now would they.  (So far the BC Liberals are no better.) 

In the end, BC Courts and government agencies have made BC women their Hookers, and continue to act as their Pimps .

See also Abortion Veto for Dads; Adoption Veto for Dads; OptionsBC.com

• BC's Registration of Live Births Form;  
• BC Vital Statistics Agency - Forms
• vital statistics act, bc - Google Search
• adoption act, bc - Google Search
• name act, bc - Google Search
• 2004-10-29 Dad files $6.3M B.C. birth certificate lawsuit - CTV -29OCT04