"Natural
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
"Natural
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage
bill"
16.10 Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to
conform
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal
BREACH OF TRUST"
FYI,
the ideas that the State assigns
Rights &
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from
pre-war Nazi Germany. Under the British system
rights are not State-given, but God Given.
Buying into the Court's position that what
rights remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same
position that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and
Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.
In
"Women and the Process of Constitutional Reform"
McLellan warns that <Horrors!>
"Provincial
Legislatures may impose a presumption of Joint Custody...
and perpetuate the domination of men over women"
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and
they will likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these
days".
This is completely FALSE. The Judges
are Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT
CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
1649, only
PARLIAMENT has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was
only observed and documented by individuals sent out by the
newly Norman Crown after the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the
laws and customs of the various peoples of Britain..
This was done with a view to aggregate existing customs
which may vary across the land, into a unified body of
Laws. The Authority quoted by the Commoners in their
administration of
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
Bible and
principles of
Danelaw
The process of documentation took only a
couple of hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body
of Law which was historical, popular, and has served in the
intervening centuries as a Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
Instead their position to promote the
"rights" of a "Parent" in the widest sense of the
word, making NO distinction between
NATURAL PARENTS and
wannaabe
Legal Parents. They have bowed to
University of
Victoria's assertion that the SCC's
Trociuk
Decision
"endorses a Heterosexual View of the Family and must be
ignored", legitimizing the ongoing
Child
Trafficking by the State which views
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in
the lucrative Child
Adoption Market They refuse to be hampered by prior
obligations to that pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can
Veto an Adoption.
It appears that many
"Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United
Nations and Liberal
Irwin Cotler's assertion that the
Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent
has "NO RIGHTS",
making the State, not the Natural
Parents the Protector of the Child..
Without Cause or
Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!
"In spite of credible revelations dating back to April 2002
about Bill Graham, a sex addicted bi-sexual sodomizing a 15
year old male prostitute named
Lawrence Metherel,
Paul Martin allowed Graham to remain
Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister - and eventually named
him to the portfolio of Minister of Defense.
"On Sept. 28/2005 a vote was held in Parliament to raise the
age of consent from 14 (one of the lowest age of consents in
the world) to 16 (an age which many still consider too low).
"Bill Graham, Paul Martin, and Anne McLellan, on Sept. 28th,
voted against raising the age of consent to 16
"The Family Courts
are <generally> a bunch of second rate hangers-on
... build each other's businesses through
referrals...Family Law is a <parasitic> self-sustaining
Industry"
Habeas
Corpus : "literally, "you
may have the body". A Habeas
Corpus is a legal writ that protects an individual against arbitrary
imprisonment by requiring that any person arrested be brought before
a court for formal charge. If the charge is considered to be valid,
the person must submit to trial; if not, the person goes free. When
the law is suspended, then individuals can be imprisoned
indefinitely and without charge."
.....
Skeletons in the Closet, a film drawn from the dramatized lives
of families living with a protected
Pedophile and the mental
illness it may create when a loving, faithful, Victim keeps the
Secret. This is shockingly
common. The Secret is their Power -
BREAK IT!
(You would be well advised to stay away from the Public Servant.)
Division of Assets: Law firms expect to take 40-60% plus
A retired Executive Assistant of major Law Firms tells us the first thing the
two Layers want is the Family Assets statement. The two lawyers
then get on the phone to each other to work out a plan to
consume 4o% to 60% of the Family Assets in Legal Fees. She said
40% of "Family Assets" is the minimum Fee they will demand,
but 60% is typical. The lawyers would take 100% of Family
Assets, but the Law Societies set the upper limit at
60% which some firms recognize.
She's worked in
major Law firms in Toronto, Montreal, and Vancouver, and she says
they are all about the same in this regard. She says there
are a few honest lawyers out there but they are as rare as
"hen's teeth". She now assists broken
fathers with document preparation for miniscule fees.
Once upon a time there was a little red hen.
She lived with a pig, a duck and a cat.
They all lived in a pretty little house which
the little red hen liked to keep clean and tidy. The little red
hen worked hard at her jobs all day. The others never helped.
Although they said they meant to, they were all far too lazy.
The pig liked to grunt in the mud outside, the duck used to swim
in the pond all day, and the cat enjoyed lying in the sun,
purring.
One day the little red hen was working in the garden when she
found a grain of corn.
"Who
will plant this grain of corn?" she asked.
"Not I," grunted the pig from his muddy patch in the garden.
"Not I," quacked the duck from her pond.
"Not I," purred the cat from his place in the sun.
So the little red hen went to look for a nice bit of earth,
scratched it with her feet and planted the grain of corn.
During the summer the grain of corn grew. First it grew into a
tall green stalk, then it ripened in the sun until it had turned
a lovely golden colour. The little red hen saw that the corn was
ready for cutting.
"Who will help me cut
the corn?" asked the little red hen.
"Not I," grunted the pig from his muddy patch in the garden.
"Not I," quacked the duck from her pond.
"Not I," purred the cat from his place in the sun.
"Very well then, I will cut it myself," said the little red hen.
Carefully she cut the stalk and took out all the grains of corn
from the husks.
"Who
will take the corn to the mill, so that it can be ground
into flour?" asked the little red hen.
"Not I," grunted the pig from his muddy patch in the garden.
"Not I," quacked the duck from her pond.
"Not I," purred the cat from his place in the sun.
So the little red hen took the corn to the mill herself, and
asked the miller if he would be so kind as to grind it into
flour. In time the miller sent a little bag of flour down
to the house where the little red hen lived with the pig and the
duck and the cat.
"Who will help me to
make the flour into bread?" asked the little red hen.
"Not I," grunted the pig from his muddy patch in the garden.
"Not I," quacked the duck from her pond.
"Not I," purred the cat from his place in the sun.
"Very well," said the little red hen. "I shall make the bread
myself."
She went into her neat little kitchen. She
mixed the flour into dough. She kneaded the dough and put it
into the oven to bake. Soon there was a lovely smell of
hot fresh bread. It filled all the corners of the house and
wafted out into the garden. The pig came into the kitchen from
his muddy patch in the garden, the duck came in from the pond
and the cat left his place in the sun. When the little red hen
opened the oven door the dough had risen up and had turned into
the nicest, most delicious looking loaf of bread any of them had
seen.
"Who
is going to eat this bread?" asked the little red hen.
"I
will," grunted the pig.
"I
will," quacked the duck.
"I will,"
purred the cat.
"Oh
no, you won't," said the little red hen. "I planted the seed, I
cut the corn, I took it to the mill to be made into flour, and I
made the bread, all by myself. I shall now eat the loaf all by
myself."
The pig, the duck and the cat all stood and watched as the
little red hen ate the loaf all by herself. It was delicious and
she enjoyed it, right to the very last crumb.
"40% of "Family Assets" is the minimum Fee they will demand,
but 60% is typical. The lawyers would take 100% of Family
Assets, but the Law Societies set the upper limit at
60% which some firms recognize."
The Canadian Bar
Association is now demanding the Assets of unmarried couples in
BC to be ceased by the Family Courts for redistribution among
fellow CBA memebers..
"...
40% of "Family Assets" is the minimum Fee <Lawyers> demand, .. would go
for everything, but the Law Societies set the upper limit at
60% which some firms recognize."
"In Ontario
alone, the names
Cornwall, Prescott,
and London became
synonymous with
"respectable" pedophile
rings -- lawyers, doctors, police officers
and
Catholic clergymen -- that for decades
preyed on society's most vulnerable
boys."
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.
More:
