"Natural
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
"Natural
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage
bill"
16.10 Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to
conform
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal
BREACH OF TRUST"
FYI,
the ideas that the State assigns
Rights &
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from
pre-war Nazi Germany. Under the British system
rights are not State-given, but God Given.
Buying into the Court's position that what
rights remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same
position that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and
Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.
In
"Women and the Process of Constitutional Reform"
McLellan warns that <Horrors!>
"Provincial
Legislatures may impose a presumption of Joint Custody...
and perpetuate the domination of men over women"
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and
they will likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these
days".
This is completely FALSE. The Judges
are Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT
CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
1649, only
PARLIAMENT has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was
only observed and documented by individuals sent out by the
newly Norman Crown after the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the
laws and customs of the various peoples of Britain..
This was done with a view to aggregate existing customs
which may vary across the land, into a unified body of
Laws. The Authority quoted by the Commoners in their
administration of
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
Bible and
principles of
Danelaw
The process of documentation took only a
couple of hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body
of Law which was historical, popular, and has served in the
intervening centuries as a Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
Instead their position to promote the
"rights" of a "Parent" in the widest sense of the
word, making NO distinction between
NATURAL PARENTS and
wannaabe
Legal Parents. They have bowed to
University of
Victoria's assertion that the SCC's
Trociuk
Decision
"endorses a Heterosexual View of the Family and must be
ignored", legitimizing the ongoing
Child
Trafficking by the State which views
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in
the lucrative Child
Adoption Market They refuse to be hampered by prior
obligations to that pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can
Veto an Adoption.
It appears that many
"Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United
Nations and Liberal
Irwin Cotler's assertion that the
Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent
has "NO RIGHTS",
making the State, not the Natural
Parents the Protector of the Child..
Without Cause or
Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!
"In spite of credible revelations dating back to April 2002
about Bill Graham, a sex addicted bi-sexual sodomizing a 15
year old male prostitute named
Lawrence Metherel,
Paul Martin allowed Graham to remain
Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister - and eventually named
him to the portfolio of Minister of Defense.
"On Sept. 28/2005 a vote was held in Parliament to raise the
age of consent from 14 (one of the lowest age of consents in
the world) to 16 (an age which many still consider too low).
"Bill Graham, Paul Martin, and Anne McLellan, on Sept. 28th,
voted against raising the age of consent to 16
"The Family Courts
are <generally> a bunch of second rate hangers-on
... build each other's businesses through
referrals...Family Law is a <parasitic> self-sustaining
Industry"
Habeas
Corpus : "literally, "you
may have the body". A Habeas
Corpus is a legal writ that protects an individual against arbitrary
imprisonment by requiring that any person arrested be brought before
a court for formal charge. If the charge is considered to be valid,
the person must submit to trial; if not, the person goes free. When
the law is suspended, then individuals can be imprisoned
indefinitely and without charge."
.....
Skeletons in the Closet, a film drawn from the dramatized lives
of families living with a protected
Pedophile and the mental
illness it may create when a loving, faithful, Victim keeps the
Secret. This is shockingly
common. The Secret is their Power -
BREAK IT!
(You would be well advised to stay away from the Public Servant.)
Domestic Violence Scam, VAWA & "Women's
Studies" Hate
Propaganda
Domestic Violence Reports, DV Fraud,
VAWA
Now
that women are fully participating in the workforce, it is also found
that
women are presently 20-30% MORE likely
to be
Promiscuous
and
Adulterous
as a group than men. It is
easy to infer from this that a primary limitation on female Adultery and
Promiscuity supporting the notion that Adultery Victims were
overwhelmingly female was NOT due the the feminine "character" but
was due their lack of
opportunity
in prior decades. (It's not rocket
science to figure out why this turns out to be the case.)
When Paternity Testing is done, BTW, the
frequency that the man the Mother claims to be the Father is in fact NOT
the father is around 30-40%. In BC thanks to
NDP legislation, it matters not who the Natural Father is in Paternity
suites, and the NDP and BC Government has become fully participant in BC
Paternity Fraud.
Harvard Medical School announced
a major study showing that 24% of
heterosexual couples have violence,
half of it reciprocal, and that
women initiate most of the
reciprocal violence and 71% of the
non-reciprocal violence, and both
suffer significant injuries.
(Homosexual pairs are far more
violent than Heterosexual couples,
we are told. Check this with
your local Homicide investigators.)
University of Pennsylvania
Professor Richard Gelles states:
'Contrary to the claim that women
only hit in self-defense, we found
that women were as likely to
initiate the violence as were men'
"In situations where very low levels of
violence are documented or there are results that are otherwise not expected,
the findings should be discussed with key informants and different community
groups before being widely disseminated. Where these groups question the
validity of the findings, their concerns should also be presented during
dissemination activities."
".... The
Steering Committee of the WHO Study agreed that interviews with men
should not be included, largely because of the logistic and safety
implications of interviewing men and women in the same study. The
Committee recognized the importance of getting accurate data on violence
from men but considered that such an endeavour was worthy of its own
study. ..."
Looks at the size and scale of the DV abuse industry and the
relentless exaggeration and bias that has helped it grow. Also
looks at the spreading definition of DV to include all manner of
non-violent behaviours.
• What is domestic violence? • Claims of DV in child
custody battles
• The myth of the
Rule of Thumb • The police’s special interest in DV
Covers the invention of
Battered Woman Syndrome by Lenore Walker and its
misuse as a legal defence when women murder their
husbands. Includes the
Deepak Ahluwalia story, a man killed while he
slept by his wife
Kiranjit Ahluwalia using a substance similar to
Napalm.
• What exactly is a “battering”? •
Attempts to change UK law to allow pre-meditated
murder by women • The “cycle of abuse” •
Media coverage of DV
The
Duluth model is a commonly used reference tool used by
various agencies, including government, which
asserts that men are violent and aggressive towards women and
dominate women in society. This model is applied to all men
regardless of upbringing or circumstances. This film examines
this model to see if the idea that only men are violent and that
women are perpetual victims holds water.
• Women’s violence to children • How men are
raised and conditioned, and the values they are taught •
DV and powerlessness • The flaws in the common
understanding of the causes of DV
Looks at the methods by which misinformation is spread and
introduces Films 09 – 14 that deal with the most common of the
various claims made by the DV abuse industry.
Examining the murder rates of domestic violence and questioning
why only the female victims are discussed by government and
media. Looks at the exclusion of men in the provision of support
for DV victims.
An analysis of the most commonly cited statistic in the
domestic violence roadshow – “1 in 4 women experience domestic
violence in their lifetimes”. Looks at the way DV has been made
into a gender issue when this is demonstrably false and the
reasons men are wrongly and deliberately singled out for blame.
• The inflation of DV figures • DV and the link with
personality disorders • False beliefs about the nature of
DV and women’s role in its occurrence • Charities cynical
bias towards women in the pursuit of income • How
Feminists use the issue of DV to generate income for their
campaign against men • Police handling of DV incidents
• Brief look at rape statistics
Examines the impossibility of the claim that the police
receive a call about domestic violence every 10 seconds and
other similar exaggerated figures. Looks at the media
portrayal of male domestic violence victims and how men are put
into impossible situations when attempting to deal with female
violence.
12: Domestic Violence - 100 Thousand Women Favorite
How the DV abuse industry inflated the incidence of DV
against women in London during the 1990’s, claiming that
“100,000 women seek hospital treatment for DV every year”.
Features
Rosalind Miles,
Sandra Horley and
Susan Edwards.
• Metropolitan Police flawed extrapolation of DV figures
• False claims of female mortality attributed to DV
13: Domestic Violence - Pregnancy and Greater Risk
An examination of the unsupportable claims made by the charities
Women’s Aid and Refuge and by agencies in the US, that pregnant
women are at greater risk from domestic violence.
Looks at the claim reported on the BBC that “a woman
experiences 35 attacks before contacting the police”.
Covers the misleading use of statistics and highlights the fact
that men are up to 9 times less likely to report abuse than
women. Also looks at the police’s unwillingness to deal with
female DV and the negligible media coverage of female violence.
• Male domestic violence victims; • Men’s experience of
violence from women
Covering the low prevalence of stalking in the UK by men or
women and the automatic guilt of men compared with the automatic
innocence of women in the presentation of DV in TV and film.
• Consensual domestic violence • How suffering DV is used
as justification for crimes committed by women
Uncovering the true nature of domestic violence and the reasons
behind its heavy coverage in the news. Describing how DV is
clearly not a gender issue but is treated as one by government
and charities in order to target men and generate income.
• DV is connected with personality disorder and poverty •
Mediation is required for DV in families, rather than the police
or the courts • DV and the choices that people make
In
a just world, Englishwoman
Erin Pizzey, who founded the
world's first shelter for battered wives in 1971,
would be a sought-after speaker on the subject of
domestic violence. In the real world, however, Pizzey's
name is a byword for politically incorrect apostasy.
Pizzey's
crime? A humanist, she challenged the belief system
dictated by radical feminists, who colonized her shelter
and made her presence untenable. Their ideological
mantra, still alive and kicking, insists that men are
the default perpetrators in domestic violence (also
known as "intimate partner violence," or IPV, in the
jargon) while women are invariably innocent victims who
inflict violence only in self-defence. But Pizzey knew
from her own experience (her wealthy, socially elite
parents were mutually abusive, and her mother violent to
Erin), and from what the women in her shelter told her,
that most partner violence is reciprocal.
Holding
women responsible for their violence was so at odds with
the received wisdom of the movement's activists that,
for her whistle-blowing pains, Pizzey's dog was killed
and her entire family received death threats. Undaunted,
she pursued her equal-responsibility crusade in the
United States for many years in a fusillade of articles
and books.
While dramatically extreme, Pizzey's story is
nevertheless emblematic of the hostility truth-tellers
confront in the domestic violence industry.
Another
outlier, University of British Columbia psychology
professor Don Dutton, is acknowledged by his peers
as a world expert on IPV. He has proven, over and over
again -- most recently in his definitive 2006 book,
Rethinking Domestic Violence -- that the tendency to
violence in intimate relationships is bilateral and
rooted in individual dysfunction: Men and women with
personality disorders and/or family histories of
violence are equally likely to be violent themselves, or
seek violent partners.
But Dutton's scientific credentials and extensive
25-year archive of peer-reviewed research cut no ice
with Canadian policymakers, none of whom has ever
solicited his advice.
Instead, pseudo-science absolving women of violent
impulses, delivered on demand to interest groups by the
same tiny, incestuous coterie of ideologically
sympathetic professionals, is routinely applied in
training police, family law judges, social workers and
women's shelter personnel.
A lazy, politically correct media dutifully spreads the
party line by reporting uncritically on bogus
selection-biased "studies" by non-accredited
stakeholders, who extrapolate to
the general population
data that are based on testimonials from men in
court-mandated therapy programs or women in shelters.
Ah,
women's shelters! Southern Ontario resident
Mariel Davison offers up a rather damning story of
what happens when naively impartial volunteerism
collides with women's shelter groupthink.
"When it comes to nonreciprocal violence between
intimate partners, women are more often the
perpetrators"
Note also that women in Lesbian relationships are twice
as likely to be violent as those in heterosexual
relationships.
Davison has an honours degree in psychology. A few years
ago, considering herself an "equal opportunity
feminist," she volunteered to serve at a local women's
shelter. During eight weeks' "training," Davison was
subjected to relentless male-bashing and junk science.
That, and the puzzling incongruity of the
female-as-victim message with the battered lesbians who
also sought refuge -- lesbian violence was a taboo
subject amongst trainees -- led to further intellectual
inquiry.
Davison thought her trove of
cutting-edge findings would prove welcome, but instead
they got her turfed by her peers: "I was told I had too
much education to volunteer at the shelter."
Incredulous, Davison dogged the shelter's supervising
and financing government ministries with demands that
they review objective literature, but was stonewalled at
every turn. Nothing came of her campaign.
And nothing will for the foreseeable future, because the
domestic-violence industry is a closed shop, from
Women's Studies courses (don't look for Pizzey's or
Dutton's research there, or in Men's Studies, since
there are none), to women-only shelters, to Status of
Women, to the National Judicial Council, to the Supreme
Court of Canada. They're all reading from the same
myth-riddled hymnbook.
Erin Pizzey and Don Dutton were both keynote speakers at
a recent Sacramento, Calif. conference sponsored by an
independent body, the National Family Violence
Legislative Resource Center (Motto: "Advocating for
nondiscriminatory and evidence-based policies"). Pizzey
accepted a lifetime achievement award to a prolonged
ovation.
Pizzey
told her standing-room-only audience that for gender
politics "Canada is the scariest country on the planet."
Scary to men who suffer because of it, certainly, but
apparently not to most other Canadians, who remain
curiously indifferent to the demonstrable misandry
permeating the institutions that define and shape our
culture.
2006-02-13 Real Domestic Violence Tactics - Tutorial
for Women on Effective Use of <FALSE> DV Allegations;
Documents what we've known since the early nineties:
Lawyers routinely encourage women to make false accusations
in Family Courts because there is no down-side for them in
perjuring themselves there. This is of course great
for the legal business, and extortionate of fathers and
their children. Reject these parasitic Highjackers,
and opt for our alternative of Equal Parenting before you
get married, or if getting divorced, before you put your
family's welfare into the hands of a Lawyer. We are
currently seeking Legal Contractors who will construct for
you by Consent, Equal Parenting Legal Documents at minimal
cost on dissolution of a Marriage.
In
a just world, Englishwoman
Erin Pizzey, who founded the
world's first shelter for battered wives in 1971,
would be a sought-after speaker on the subject of
domestic violence. In the real world, however, Pizzey's
name is a byword for politically incorrect apostasy.
Pizzey's
crime? A humanist, she challenged the belief system
dictated by radical feminists, who colonized her shelter
and made her presence untenable. Their ideological
mantra, still alive and kicking, insists that men are
the default perpetrators in domestic violence (also
known as "intimate partner violence," or IPV, in the
jargon) while women are invariably innocent victims who
inflict violence only in self-defence. But Pizzey knew
from her own experience (her wealthy, socially elite
parents were mutually abusive, and her mother violent to
Erin), and from what the women in her shelter told her,
that most partner violence is reciprocal.
Holding
women responsible for their violence was so at odds with
the received wisdom of the movement's activists that,
for her whistle-blowing pains, Pizzey's dog was killed
and her entire family received death threats. Undaunted,
she pursued her equal-responsibility crusade in the
United States for many years in a fusillade of articles
and books.
While dramatically extreme, Pizzey's story is
nevertheless emblematic of the hostility truth-tellers
confront in the domestic violence industry.
Another
outlier, University of British Columbia psychology
professor Don Dutton, is acknowledged by his peers
as a world expert on IPV. He has proven, over and over
again -- most recently in his definitive 2006 book,
Rethinking Domestic Violence -- that the tendency to
violence in intimate relationships is bilateral and
rooted in individual dysfunction: Men and women with
personality disorders and/or family histories of
violence are equally likely to be violent themselves, or
seek violent partners.
But Dutton's scientific credentials and extensive
25-year archive of peer-reviewed research cut no ice
with Canadian policymakers, none of whom has ever
solicited his advice.
Instead, pseudo-science absolving women of violent
impulses, delivered on demand to interest groups by the
same tiny, incestuous coterie of ideologically
sympathetic professionals, is routinely applied in
training police, family law judges, social workers and
women's shelter personnel.
A lazy, politically correct media dutifully spreads the
party line by reporting uncritically on bogus
selection-biased "studies" by non-accredited
stakeholders, who extrapolate to
the general population
data that are based on testimonials from men in
court-mandated therapy programs or women in shelters.
Ah,
women's shelters! Southern Ontario resident
Mariel Davison offers up a rather damning story of
what happens when naively impartial volunteerism
collides with women's shelter groupthink.
"When it comes to nonreciprocal violence between
intimate partners, women are more often the
perpetrators"
Note also that women in Lesbian relationships are twice
as likely to be violent as those in heterosexual
relationships.
Davison has an honours degree in psychology. A few years
ago, considering herself an "equal opportunity
feminist," she volunteered to serve at a local women's
shelter. During eight weeks' "training," Davison was
subjected to relentless male-bashing and junk science.
That, and the puzzling incongruity of the
female-as-victim message with the battered lesbians who
also sought refuge -- lesbian violence was a taboo
subject amongst trainees -- led to further intellectual
inquiry.
Davison thought her trove of
cutting-edge findings would prove welcome, but instead
they got her turfed by her peers: "I was told I had too
much education to volunteer at the shelter."
Incredulous, Davison dogged the shelter's supervising
and financing government ministries with demands that
they review objective literature, but was stonewalled at
every turn. Nothing came of her campaign.
And nothing will for the foreseeable future, because the
domestic-violence industry is a closed shop, from
Women's Studies courses (don't look for Pizzey's or
Dutton's research there, or in Men's Studies, since
there are none), to women-only shelters, to Status of
Women, to the National Judicial Council, to the Supreme
Court of Canada. They're all reading from the same
myth-riddled hymnbook.
Erin Pizzey and Don Dutton were both keynote speakers at
a recent Sacramento, Calif. conference sponsored by an
independent body, the National Family Violence
Legislative Resource Center (Motto: "Advocating for
nondiscriminatory and evidence-based policies"). Pizzey
accepted a lifetime achievement award to a prolonged
ovation.
Pizzey
told her standing-room-only audience that for gender
politics "Canada is the scariest country on the planet."
Scary to men who suffer because of it, certainly, but
apparently not to most other Canadians, who remain
curiously indifferent to the demonstrable misandry
permeating the institutions that define and shape our
culture.
What's Women's Lib about? Nick
Rockefeller says it was to get women into
the work force so they can be taxed.
Secondly it was to get Parents away for
children so the kids would see the State as
their Father. See also
Dodd, Norman,
Congressional Investigator, former Banker
2006-04-01 Violent Woman's call to Police and
attack on her husband caught on HeadCam. Video- wmv;
Classic Woman's con caught on HeadCAM: Attack
husband, and call Police for "protection" from the
husband's "Violence". In Canada, the RCMP Policy
Manual instructs Officers to arrest the "heaviest"
individual at a Domestic Dispute, but in practice it is
the man who is arrested regardless of which spouse is
the Attacker.
Note
also that in Domestic Disputes, Police policy is to arrest the
"heaviest" spouse (ie. Dad) without regard to the facts before them.
This and the
False Accusation Impunity doctrine readily puts
innocent Dads in jail and fighting criminal charges which are entirely
manufactured. When Domestic Violence statistics are compiled, the
writers usually prefer to report ARREST statistics rather than
CONVICTION statistics. Watch out for this trick!
Subject: Crime is about people, not stats (Aug. 1, 2004)
There is one thing about Stats Can. non-stats that
few seem to have paid any attention to. Stats Can. does not report data
on crime, only on reports made to police which they then disseminate as
if these reports were found facts.
True, they do give that caveat in the each of their releases, but
then go on to call a complainer a “victim” and an accused an “offender”
or a “perpetrator”.
According to a subset of 94 police departments representing 56% of
the national volume of crime, in 2002, approximately one-quarter (27%)
of all victims of violent crimes were victims of family violence. Among
all family violence victims, 6-in-10 (62%) were victims of violence at
the hands of their spouse.
• In 2002, females accounted for 8-in-10 (85%) of all victims of
spousal violence reported to the subset of police departments. Young
females aged 25-to-34 experienced the highest rates of spousal violence.
• The most commonly reported spousal violence offence for both female
and male victims was common assault (64% and 60%).
• About eighty percent of spousal violence incidents resulted in a
charge being laid by police. Incidents involving female victims (82%)
were more likely to result in a charge being laid than those involving
male victims (70%).
• According to a subset of 78 police departments who have
consistently reported to the Incident-based Uniform Crime Reporting
(UCR2) Survey since 1998, rates of police-reported spousal assault have
steadily increased for both females and males between 1998 and 2000, but
have shown slight decreases in 2001 and 2002. Annual rates were on
average, over five times lower for males than for females, however,
trend patterns for spousal assault against males were similar to those
of females.
• In 2002, according to a subset of 94 police departments, about
8-in-10 victims of criminal harassment had some form of relationship
with their stalkers, either as partners, friends/acquaintances or other
family members. Females were most likely to be criminally harassed by a
partner, while males were more likely to be harassed by an acquaintance.
Note how Stats Can. is silent about the rate of convictions.
Furthermore, the phrase “females accounted …. of all victims of spousal
violence reported to the police” is misleading as it presupposes that an
act of violence had actually occurred. A report does not make a finding
of fact, therefore the correct phrase simply is “females made … of calls
received by the police”. That is especially true as the police dismiss
most of the calls outright.
Note: “wife assault” is a subgroup of “other” assaults. The police no
longer give separate data for males and females. In spite of several
requests, the police refuse to tell how many of the reports were made by
men or women and how many were about intimate partner violence.
Yet, Stats Can. will disseminate the above as: there were 2,226 assault
victims …. That, of course is not true, especially considering that they
do not tell us how many of the calls were repeat calls by the same
person, how many of the calls were dismissed without charges being laid,
etc.
Ottawa Police Services:
The City of Ottawa Chief of Police, Vince Bevan, in his paper called
“The Partner Assault
Program: a risk management approach by the Ottawa Police Service to
reduce domestic violence” (presented at the Canadian Police College
Symposium on investigative excellence and innovation, October 2002. The
Canadian Police College is described as being “a centre for professional
education for members of the Canadian and international policing
community”) claimed that the “partner assault unit” handled 4,152 calls
to alleged incidents and laid 2,407 charges (each incident may have more
than one charge and calls can either be repeat reports by the same
complainer or a first complaint, thus it is highly doubtful that even
one half of the original complaints were credible, nor can we equate the
number of complaints to be indicative of the number of potential
perpetrators and victims) of intimate partner violence in 2001. Thus, in
spite of the stringent “zero tolerance” directives, the majority of the
reports were so unbelievable that the police, who have to justify in
writing why they failed to lay a charge and make an arrest, were not
able to justify even one charge. Yet, Stats Can. counts the number of
reports as findings of fact.
Now, let’s look at the Ottawa Police Service “Annual
Statistics, Violent Offences” for that year. These data, which one
assumes to be reliable, indicate that there were a total of 4,485 calls
to all alleged assault related incidents (again, let’s stress not
individuals who were the alleged perpetrators or victims) in Ottawa and
three homicides. If we go by the chief’s statistics, practically all
assault related calls in the city of Ottawa were by females who claimed
that they had been victimized by their intimate male partners. Yet, data
from across the world, including Canada, show that most true assault
victims are male.
It is of further interest that charges and convictions no longer need
not be based on “reasonable and probable grounds”, “reasonable” is
enough. See the Ontario Ministry of the Solicitor General and
Correctional Services. “Policing Standards Manual” Section 0217.01,
0217.04 (1994): “Mandatory Arrest/Charging policy refers to guidelines
that require police officers to lay criminal charges against the abusive
partner in all cases of wife assault where there are "reasonable
grounds"”
Judge Lyn Ratushny, in the “Self-Defence Review” that she was
commissioned to conduct by the Department of Justice Canada, claims that
a woman’s allegation is to be accepted as long as it “has an air of
reality" and/or “is supported by evidence reasonably capable of belief”.
She herself admitted that these standards are questionable. Her
definition of “reasonable” is anything but reasonable. [source:
Department of Justice. The Backgrounder, September 1997. The
Self-Defence Review: Overview and Next Steps]
The Hon. Dianne Cunnigham, Ontario Women’s Directorate said in her
speech during the opening of the North York Domestic Violence Court
Pilot Project: “...The offender must plead guilty and is required to
participate in a ‘male batterer’s program’. [Note that Ms. Cunningham
assumes that “accused” and “offender” are synonyms and that the accused,
whom she refers to as “offender”, is always a male. Furthermore,
if a guilty verdict is obtained by coercion, it is hardly an indication
of guilt]
Below is some sage advice from the law firm Birenbaum, Steinberg,
Landau, Savin & Colraine, LLP. Family Law Toronto. Information Resource.
http://www.familylawtoronto.ca/ This further proves that men who
are caught off guard when they find themselves arrested and hauled to
places like the Don Jail, are easily tricked into pleading guilty to
something that they did not do:
“Findings of abuse can have a number of consequences in a family law
case.
• A court will make a non-harassment order directing the abusive
spouse not to contact the victim, and may provide particular
restrictions regarding the type of activity that is forbidden. If the
abuser breaches that order, he or she may be found guilty of contempt.
Also, the Ontario Provincial Police can arrest without warrant, anyone
whom they reasonably believe is breaching such an order.
• A finding of abuse will almost certainly entitle the victim to
exclusive possession of the matrimonial home.
• A finding of abuse will also certainly result in the victim being
awarded custody.
• A finding of abuse may result in the other parent having his or her
access suspended, reduced or supervised.
• A finding of abuse may result in a divorce being granted on the
grounds of cruelty.
• A finding of abuse may result in additional damages for personal
injury or intentional infliction of mental suffering, and may be a
factor in the calculation of the amount of spousal support ordered to be
paid
· Just the allegation
of abuse opens the door to the possibility of such consequences at least
on a temporary basis. Judges will often err on the side of caution and
even though abuse has not been proven, will not want to run any risks.
Consequently, people accused of abuse may be ordered out of the house on
the basis of allegations or a temporary restraining order may be made on
the basis of allegations alone.
· The potential impact
of abuse or allegations of abuse can, therefore, be quite significant to
the party who is accused. The consequences to a spouse who has falsely
alleged abuse are not so dramatically or frequently applied.
· The police will often
attempt to trick a suspect into speaking to them. Common tricks are for
a police officer to say something like, "Look, if nothing happened, just
tell us and you’ll be okay," or, "It’s your right not to say anything,
but I know if I was accused of beating my child and I hadn’t done it,
I’d sure want my version on the record," or, "Let’s go outside for a
walk in the hall, just the two of us, no notebooks," or, "If you talk to
us now, things will be a lot easier on you later."
· Do not agree to any
plea without asking to speak to duty counsel. The police or even Crown
Attorneys may tell you that all you have to do to get out of this
situation is agree to a several month long anger management course and
it will be over. What they do not tell you is that you have to plead
guilty before you can take the course [end quotes]
If men who have been falsely accused refuse to plead guilty they will
face prolonged litigations and often will end up waiting for a long time
to have their cases heard. By that we can deduce that there are an awful
number of men sitting in jails while waiting to be found innocent. At an
awful cost to the accused, their families and the society. Not to
mention the numbers to be added to the false data that are churned out
from Stats Can. In spite of the evidence, Stats Can. refuses to do a
survey on false allegations.
The following suggested directive may be of interest as it now is a
standard practice by many police forces:
· Test not met:
Where there are no reasonable grounds to believe that an offence has
been committed, but police nonetheless believe that the victim’s safety
may be at risk, police should consider the availability of other
responses, including civil protection orders under provincial and
territorial legislation on domestic violence, where applicable (see
below), and recognizance orders under section 810 of the Criminal Code.
However, these alternative responses should not be used in place of
charges where the test has been met. [Source:
Spousal Abuse Policies and Legislation. Final Report of the Ad Hoc
Federal-Provincial-Territorial Working Group Reviewing Spousal Abuse
Policies and Legislation. Prepared for Federal-Provincial-Territorial
Ministers Responsible for Justice ]
In short, if there are no grounds to believe the complainer, police
will issue a restraining order if the accused is a male and thus save
themselves the trouble of having to justify in writing why they did not
lay a charge and make an arrest. These orders then are disseminated by
Stats. Can. as if they were based on valid grounds.
The same report tells us that though the other favourite Stats Can.
“finding” is that “Violence against Women” costs the Canadian
taxpayers more than $4 billion a year it is actually the creation of
the myth that costs us that much:
· In 1995, a study
of selected economic costs of three forms of violence—sexual
assault, woman abuse in intimate partnerships and incest or child
sexual abuse—estimated the partial annual costs of violence against
women in four policy areas as follows:
· the economic
burden of unintentional and intentional injuries combined is
estimated to be greater than $12.7 billion per year or 8% of the
total direct and indirect costs of illness, ranking 4th after
cardiovascular disease, musculo-skeletal conditions and cancer. (The
economic burden of illness in Canada, 1998. Health Canada, 2002)
· Another economic
study estimated that unintentional injuries alone cost Canada more
than $8.7 billion annually. (Angus D et al. The economic burden of
unintentional injury in Canada, SMARTRISK, 1998)
An example of the myth making is a program that is delivered to
school children, beginning in kindergarten, called the “Black Eyed
Susan”
http://www.bconnex.net/~dsneyd/index.htm The program directs
teachers to ask primary grade students to “draw pictures of their
impressions of the film and then describe them to the rest of the
class and to make construction paper flowers and paper bag puppets
of each of the main characters, collect the flowers and arrange them
in a vase. Encourage students to playact their puppets through
different roles from various parts of the film.”
The brainwashing becomes more intensive when children reach the
junior grades. Teachers are instructed to divide classes “into 2 or
3 drama clubs and help them produce all or part of The Disclosure, a
three-act play taken from the Black-eyed Susan script.” Let us not
forget that these same children have already been subjected to the
same propaganda in their primary level. The instructions to the
teachers are to proceed with the following methodology:
Considering the time and effort that is used for this, it is
small wonder that our children finish their education without the
essential academic skills but fully cognisant of the false data that
are presented by Stats Can. [see
http://www.bconnex.net/~dsneyd/stats.htm ]
National Judicial Institute (Canada):
“2-3 women are killed by their partner/ex-partner every week in
Canada”
According to Juristat, the yearly average number of women killed
by their current or former intimate male partners during the ten
year period between 1992 and 2001 was 65. Based on that number, the
weekly average is 1.25 women. It is noteworthy that many of these
cases were murder-suicides. It still more noteworthy that even these
numbers are inflated as many men, who were initially found guilt,
have been exonerated later though the statistics have not been
corrected. The National Judicial Institute is responsible for
judicial education in Canada.
The preferred method by Stats Can. and other propagandists is to
disseminate statistics in percentages only. Thus one Department of
Justice Canada document admits that their 100% recidivism rate was
based on two case, another report indicates that the final estimate
was arrived at by using an original sample of “10 or less” reports.
Tammy Landau in her “Synthesis of Department of Justice Canada
Research Findings on Spousal Assault” tells that the “Manitoba
Tracking Study” by Jane Ursel indicated that only 21% of all cases
dispatched resulted in charges, and only 12% resulted in
convictions.
Crown counsel withdrew or stayed 58 percent of the 474 criminal
harassment charges in our sample. Twenty-five percent of the accused
pleaded guilty, 10 percent were found guilty, and seven percent were
found not guilty. Looking at the outcomes of cases including all
charges (more meaningful, since this is the way that the Crown,
defence and the courts generally plan strategies and make
decisions), we see that in 29 percent of cases all charges were
dropped in exchange for a peace bond, and in an additional 20
percent of cases all charges were dropped or stayed unconditionally
(Table 9). A conviction on at least one charge was obtained in 46
percent of the cases. Fifteen percent of accused pleaded guilty to
all charges, and eight percent were found guilty of all charges. In
nine percent of cases the accused was convicted of criminal
harassment, and all other charges were withdrawn or stayed.
Looking at criminal harassment charges only, Vancouver, Toronto
and Montreal withdrew or stayed charges with considerable
frequency (68 percent, 61 percent and 56 percent respectively).
Winnipeg withdrew or stayed 49 percent, Edmonton 47 percent and
Halifax 20 percent (2 cases). Peace bond resolutions where
criminal harassment was the only charge were most frequent in
Montreal (35 percent), less frequent in Vancouver and Toronto
(26 percent and 20 percent), and least frequent in Edmonton (13
percent), Winnipeg (10 percent) and Halifax (no cases). The
criminal harassment conviction rate in Halifax was 80 percent (8
cases). In Winnipeg it was 45 percent, in Edmonton 42 percent,
in Toronto 36 percent, in Montreal 31 percent and in Vancouver
22 percent.
· [I]n about 20
percent of the cases in which charges were dropped or stayed,
the file indicated that the victim wanted the charges to be
dropped, or that the victim did not cooperate with the
prosecution of the case in some way. The files in no cases
indicated that these were determining factors in the Crown's
decision, but it is clear from our interviews that most Crown
see no point in taking a case to trial without the victim being
willing to testify in keeping with the original statements taken
by the police.
Police Services Division, British Columbia Ministry of Attorney
General, called "Survey of Spousal Assaults Reported to Police
[year] in British Columbia" has made an attempt to document the
number of initial reports that are eventually validated.
According to this report, in 1996, 70% of level 1 reports of
[alleged] spousal assault cases were cleared by charges, whereas
28% of reports of level 1 of [alleged] non-spousal assaults were
similarly cleared. Ten per cent of all charges were for
allegations of uttering threats [p. 22]. As Statistics Canada
bases the numbers that it
The survey indicates that 48% of the reported “incidents” ended
in convictions. Only 36% of all charges laid by the Crown ended
in conviction, 56% ended in non-conviction, and ‘other’ findings
accounted for 8% of the outcome. It is curious that there is no
reference to the possibility that the charges in the 56%
non-convictions were due to false allegations. Or that at least
some of the 48% who were convicted were innocent.
The report continues: “It is interesting to note that although
60% of the charges [not incidents which each may have several
separate charges] were for the least serious form of assault
(level 1 assault) and 71% of victims did not seek medical
attention, in most cases the police proceeded with charges and
the crown approved these charges.”
The semantics become somewhat confusing, once more, as p. vii
of the report tells that about 13% sought medical attention. The
breakdown on p. 20 indicates that in 16% of the cases it was not
known if medical attention was sought. The 13% includes both
male and female victims.
When looking at injury related statistics it is prudent to keep
in mind that a British Home Office Research Study (HORS
191)shows that rather than seeking medical attention for
injuries "half of the women who saw a doctor or went to hospital
said that it was wholly or partly for emotional or other
reasons" [p. 38]
According to the latest Statistics Canada annual "Family
Violence in Canada" there were 1.2 million Adult Criminal Court
Convictions from
1997/98 to 2001/02; out of these 257,000 were "crimes against
the person" convictions. There were 727,000 [reports of] violent
crimes which were cleared by charge from 1997 to 2001 and a
total of 3.5 million of reported incidents. Thus, about one
third of the incidents (or charges) cleared ended in
convictions. As many convictions are achieved by somewhat shady
plea bargains even this number seems inflated. Furthermore, each
report may result in several charges being laid, or may be a
repeat call by the same complainer. [note how Stats Can., in
order to create more confusion, compares different time spans
against each other]
The document in hand does not specify how many of the reports
were dismissed outright by the police in spite of the zero
tolerance directives.
Health Canada:
In 2001, Health Canada began to issue statistics from hospital
ERs and immediately encountered a problem. Women’s visits to
emergency departments due to all assault related injuries are
minimal. Only 2.27 percent of all injury related visits to
hospital ER by all females (3.27% males) were due to all
“quarrels/aggression” (Health Canada’s term), irrespective of
the victim-perpetrator relationship. Another set of tables
indicates that only 1.19 percent of all ER visits by females
were by women in the 20-24 age group (2.87% in the 25-44 age
group), the maximum number of visits were made by girls between
the ages of 1-4 (9.90), closely followed by those between the
ages of 10-14 (9.54%) and 5-9 (8.54%). The corresponding numbers
for males are: 20-24 years: 1.90% (25-44 years: 5.00%); 1-4
years: 12.95%; 5-9 years: 11.72% and 10-14 years: 15.90%. It is
hard to fathom where Statistics Canada finds the scores of
battered women who, allegedly, need medical help.
What is urgently needed if we want to have some semblance of
reality is that the press becomes aware of the facts behind the
figures.
Sincerely,
Eeva Sodhi
RR 1 McDonald’s Corners,
Ontario, K0G 1M0
Domestic Violence Scam & Women's Studies'
Hate
Propaganda
".... The Steering Committee of the WHO Study agreed that interviews
with men should not be included ..."
"In situations where very low levels of violence are documented or
there are results that are otherwise not expected, the findings should
be discussed with key informants and different community groups before
being widely disseminated."
Rockefeller Foundation is a Sponsor of the World
Health Organization
World Health Organization (WHO) gags unbiased DV studies, demands
falsified reporting on Violence Against Women
".... The Steering Committee of the WHO Study agreed that interviews
with men should not be included ..."
"In situations where very low levels of violence are documented or
there are results that are otherwise not expected, the findings should
be discussed with key informants and different community groups before
being widely disseminated."
Tax Exempt
Rockefeller Foundation
& Rockefeller Family backs Global Taxation and a Global Soviet
Government
"Some even believe we are
part of a secret Cabal
working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing
my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others
around the world to build a more integrated global political and
economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I STAND
GUILTY, and I AM PROUD OF IT",
Presently, the burden of proof is on the Accused to prove
themselves innocent (unless you are in a Criminal Court), Rare is the Judge who enforces Perjury laws against a
woman.
FYI the rate of violence and murder in
lesbian relationships is bizarrely high when compared to
heterosexual couples. Sexual mutilation of the corpse is
common, but not reported in the papers for fear of offending the
"gays".
Tax Exempt
Rockefeller Foundation
& Rockefeller Family backs Global Taxation and a Global Soviet
Government
"Some even believe we are
part of a secret Cabal
working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing
my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others
around the world to build a more integrated global political and
economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I STAND
GUILTY, and I AM PROUD OF IT",
"Honourable
senators know that I have studied a terrible and pernicious
heart of darkness that has developed in our court system, being
the use of
FALSE ACCUSATIONS in civil justice.
This is the
mischief of litigating parties, usually mothers, suddenly within
the context of divorce and within child custody proceedings
falsely accusing the other party, usually fathers, of the sexual
abuse of their own children. ,,,
These
FALSE ALLEGATIONS are often made with the overt or
covert complicity of their lawyers. They are a lethal weapon in
the business of parental alienation. They are a tool for
achieving sole custody of children and creating fatherlessness."
"politically correct"
information you read on Domestic Violence is a Scam.
Like taking away the guns, the State is taking out the Men as
part of their Disarmament program in preparation for the New
World Order.
Note that a common trick used by the "Femi-Nazi" type "scholars"
in
our "Women's Studies"
faculties to support their Misandric
Propaganda is to report Statistics drawn women's REPORTS of
domestic violence to Police rather than actual VERIFIED
INCIDENTS of Domestic Violence. What these Statistics
actually tell you is that women are far more likely to LIE about
Domestic Violence than men in reporting violence.
In Canada it's not very likely that a man will even report
Domestic Violence if he knew that RCMP policy is to always make
an arrest in cases of Domestic Violence, and the one they will
arrest is the "heaviest" Spouse. You will not be surprised
that like Law, Police work is a career Lesbians have pursued
vigorously, and that a man calling the RCMP for help is most
likely going to get ridiculed or beaten even more by a SWARM of
these these female RCMP.
Recall that
Aaron Russo tells us that the
Rockefellers claimed that "Feminism" was their idea, and
funded by them not to emancipate women, but to get women out of
the Child Rearing business so children would have to be raised
entirely by the State. See also
Griffin, G. Edward
BTW,
now that women are about as likely to be in the workplace as
men, it is now found that women are now far MORE likely to be
Violent, commit Adultery, and be Promiscuous than men.
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.
2008-02-14
Erin Pizzey on KFBK talk radio (Sacramento,
California) 
