"Natural
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
"Natural
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage
bill"
16.10 Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to
conform
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal
BREACH OF TRUST"
FYI,
the ideas that the State assigns
Rights &
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from
pre-war Nazi Germany. Under the British system
rights are not State-given, but God Given.
Buying into the Court's position that what
rights remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same
position that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and
Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.
In
"Women and the Process of Constitutional Reform"
McLellan warns that <Horrors!>
"Provincial
Legislatures may impose a presumption of Joint Custody...
and perpetuate the domination of men over women"
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and
they will likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these
days".
This is completely FALSE. The Judges
are Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT
CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
1649, only
PARLIAMENT has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was
only observed and documented by individuals sent out by the
newly Norman Crown after the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the
laws and customs of the various peoples of Britain..
This was done with a view to aggregate existing customs
which may vary across the land, into a unified body of
Laws. The Authority quoted by the Commoners in their
administration of
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
Bible and
principles of
Danelaw
The process of documentation took only a
couple of hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body
of Law which was historical, popular, and has served in the
intervening centuries as a Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
Instead their position to promote the
"rights" of a "Parent" in the widest sense of the
word, making NO distinction between
NATURAL PARENTS and
wannaabe
Legal Parents. They have bowed to
University of
Victoria's assertion that the SCC's
Trociuk
Decision
"endorses a Heterosexual View of the Family and must be
ignored", legitimizing the ongoing
Child
Trafficking by the State which views
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in
the lucrative Child
Adoption Market They refuse to be hampered by prior
obligations to that pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can
Veto an Adoption.
It appears that many
"Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United
Nations and Liberal
Irwin Cotler's assertion that the
Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent
has "NO RIGHTS",
making the State, not the Natural
Parents the Protector of the Child..
Without Cause or
Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!
"In spite of credible revelations dating back to April 2002
about Bill Graham, a sex addicted bi-sexual sodomizing a 15
year old male prostitute named
Lawrence Metherel,
Paul Martin allowed Graham to remain
Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister - and eventually named
him to the portfolio of Minister of Defense.
"On Sept. 28/2005 a vote was held in Parliament to raise the
age of consent from 14 (one of the lowest age of consents in
the world) to 16 (an age which many still consider too low).
"Bill Graham, Paul Martin, and Anne McLellan, on Sept. 28th,
voted against raising the age of consent to 16
"The Family Courts
are <generally> a bunch of second rate hangers-on
... build each other's businesses through
referrals...Family Law is a <parasitic> self-sustaining
Industry"
Habeas
Corpus : "literally, "you
may have the body". A Habeas
Corpus is a legal writ that protects an individual against arbitrary
imprisonment by requiring that any person arrested be brought before
a court for formal charge. If the charge is considered to be valid,
the person must submit to trial; if not, the person goes free. When
the law is suspended, then individuals can be imprisoned
indefinitely and without charge."
.....
Skeletons in the Closet, a film drawn from the dramatized lives
of families living with a protected
Pedophile and the mental
illness it may create when a loving, faithful, Victim keeps the
Secret. This is shockingly
common. The Secret is their Power -
BREAK IT!
(You would be well advised to stay away from the Public Servant.)
Enticement & Seduction Common Law Claims in Tort Precluded:
Tort Claims Eliminated by
Trudeau's "No Fault" Divorce & BC Statute
Enticement & Seduction Common Law Claims in Tort Precluded
Tort Claims Eliminated by
Trudeau's "No Fault" Divorce & BC Statute
There is a plethora of Courts and Government agencies set on the
Enticement of Mothers to destroy their families and feed their Industry with
the children's inheritance and the Family's Assets in their so-called "Mixed
War" against the Family.
Canadian
Federal Law, facilitating Common Law
Claims against Enticers & Seducers. Victims
were able to claim penalties
in Tort against Third Parties for Enticement and
Seduction.
"Common
law recognized two
tort causes of action against third parties who interfered with the
marriage relation:
Enticement and
Seduction.
Enticement, which evolved into the tort of alienation of affections,
punished the inducement of a wife to leave her husband. Unlike enticement,
Seduction, which evolved into the tort of criminal conversation, required an
adulterous relationship between the plaintiffs wife and the defendant."
Fundamental Principals of Family Law, Nolan
Enticement - the
act of persuading a Spouse to leave their marriage or intentionally
interfering with a married couple’s consortium - has become the every day practice
of Feminist Groups, even their "raison d'etre", funded principally by
the Taxpayor. The double standards and double talk of
Feminarcissism has become commonplace in Churches of the
Promise Keepers variety.
Seduction
- the adulterous bedding of a married Spouse - is clearly a primary drive of
many Public Officers, Lawyers, and Women's'
Shelters programs. When rebuffed, Public Officers and Women's Shelter
bosses commonly use government powers to hound, rob, and destroy the lives of
those refusing to submit to their sexual demands. From what we can tell
from Refugees from the "Shelters", this has become the dominant culture of
Women's' Shelters.
In BC,
Enticement, a common law cause of action even without the Federal
Statute, was then expressly precluded by the
BC Family Relations Act,
to protect government officers perpetrating the Enticements & Seductions.
This is something we can have changed, and start pursuing Public Officers,
Lawyers and Private Individuals looking to get your Spouse out of your home and
into their sack.
Lawyers consistently estimate the homosexual
fraction of the Law Societies & Judiciaries as "forty-something"
percent. That is, a randomly selected Judge or Lawyer is
about thirty times more likely to be homosexual than the
population at large. (BTW, a randomly selected Homosexual
is about forty times more likely to be a
Pedophile than a
randomly selected Canadian.).
The Judiciary now claims the right to
INTERPRET whatever meaning they want into the written Statutes
of Parliament, and refuse to be bound by any literal, contextual
reading of a Statute of Parliament.
By these nefarious
means
Activist Judges
have "interpreted" the Charter to give themselves
Homosexual Marriage
and with it eliminated Natural Parents' rights, obliging - they
claim - our Parliament & Legislatures to replace the term
NATURAL PARENT
with the term
LEGAL PARENT.
Without the knowledge or
consent of the Canadian people, these
Activist Judges
have robbed you of the right to be the Legal Parent of your own
Natural Children.,
We are noticing too that they
are lying to us about what
COMMON LAW is. Ask a few lawyers what Common Law is,
and we guess they will tell you the Lie that it is whatever is
commonly being Ordered by
the Judges at any point in time, and
is therefore very dynamic and cannot be defined. We can
happily tell you this is completely FALSE, and is instead an
admission of their malicious intent.
Byron Prior on Newfoundland's
"Grubstake System" in which men at sea like Byron's
Dad
Randall Prior work not for cash in payment, but for
a Stake in the grub at the
Company Store. The men are kept at sea, while
their wives are impregnated by wealthy businessmen
dispensing not just the "Grub" to the ladies back home.
In time, women who couldn't pay their
Debts became a commodity to be sold by the
Company Store like any other product open for Offer
and Exchange of goods and services there by Barter.
The stores became a Storefront for prostitution and
trading favors among the Wealthy of the community.
It appears that the Wealthy in Newfoundland have
thoroughly co-opted the Courts and Medical Professions
there, and have made the
"Grubstake System" and
Child
Prostitution in Newfoundland privately acceptable
and "normal" among the very wealthy.
Hester Lessard, Feminist Law,
University of Victoria
"Heterosexual View of Parenthood must be ignored"
"Trociuk is .. a
disheartening endorsement of biological concepts of parenthood
... flawed .... it legitimizes a heterosexual view of the family. ..
It must be ignored."
Domestic Violence Scam & Women's Studies'
Hate
Propaganda
".... The Steering Committee of the WHO Study agreed that interviews
with men should not be included ..."
"In situations where very low levels of violence are documented or
there are results that are otherwise not expected, the findings should
be discussed with key informants and different community groups before
being widely disseminated."
Rockefeller Foundation is a Sponsor of the World
Health Organization
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and they
will likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these days".
This is completely FALSE. The Judges are
Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT
CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
1649, only PARLIAMENT has
the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was only
observed and documented by individuals sent out by the newly
Norman Crown after the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the laws
and customs of the various peoples of Britain.. This was done with a view to aggregate
existing customs which may vary across the land, into a unified
body of Laws.
The Authority quoted by the Commoners in their administration of
Common Law
were frequently direct quotations from the
Bible and
principles of
Danelaw
The process of documentation took
only a couple of hundred years, and the product was a STATIC
body of Law which was historical, popular, and has served in the
intervening centuries as a Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for
"Fairness".
It does NOT change.
"If
a man will not submit the the Spiritual Authority God has placed
over him - thePastor -, his wife should leave him to break his
heart and hold his feet to the fire until he becomes Teachable
and Accountable to the Pastor."
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and they
will likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these days".
This is completely FALSE. The Judges are
Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT
CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
1649, only PARLIAMENT has
the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was only
observed and documented by individuals sent out by the newly
Norman Crown after the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the laws
and customs of the various peoples of Britain.. This was done with a view to aggregate
existing customs which may vary across the land, into a unified
body of Laws.
The Authority quoted by the Commoners in their administration of
Common Law
were frequently direct quotations from the
Bible and
principles of
Danelaw
The process of documentation took
only a couple of hundred years, and the product was a STATIC
body of Law which was historical, popular, and has served in the
intervening centuries as a Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for
"Fairness".
It does NOT change.
World Health Organization (WHO) gags unbiased DV studies, demands
falsified reporting on Violence Against Women
".... The Steering Committee of the WHO Study agreed that interviews
with men should not be included ..."
"In situations where very low levels of violence are documented or
there are results that are otherwise not expected, the findings should
be discussed with key informants and different community groups before
being widely disseminated."
Lawyers consistently estimate the homosexual fraction of
the Law Societies & Judiciaries as "forty-something" percent.
That is,
a randomly selected Judge or Lawyer is about thirty
TIMES more likely to be homosexual than the population at large
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.
