"Natural
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
"Natural
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage
bill"
16.10 Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule
has to go to conform to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be
held in criminal BREACH OF TRUST"
FYI,
the ideas that the State grants
Rights
Responsibilities Citizen is straight from pre-war Nazi
Germany. Under the British system rights are not
State-given, but God Given.
Buying into the Court's position that what
rights remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same
position that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and
Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.
In
"Women and the Process of Constitutional Reform"
McLellan warns that <Horrors!>
"Provincial
Legislatures may impose a presumption of Joint Custody...
and perpetuate the domination of men over women"
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and
they will likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these
days".
This is completely FALSE. The Judges
are Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT
CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
1649, only
PARLIAMENT has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was
only observed and documented by individuals sent out by the
newly Norman Crown after the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the
laws and customs of the various peoples of Britain..
This was done with a view to aggregate existing customs
which may vary across the land, into a unified body of
Laws. The Authority quoted by the Commoners in their
administration of
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
Bible and
principles of
Danelaw
The process of documentation took only a
couple of hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body
of Law which was historical, popular, and has served in the
intervening centuries as a Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
Instead their position to promote the
"rights" of a "Parent" in the widest sense of the
word, making NO distinction between
NATURAL PARENTS and
wannaabe
Legal Parents. They have bowed to
University of
Victoria's assertion that the SCC's
Trociuk
Decision
"endorses a Heterosexual View of the Family and must be
ignored", legitimizing the ongoing
Child
Trafficking by the State which views
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in
the lucrative Child
Adoption Market They refuse to be hampered by prior
obligations to that pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can
Veto an Adoption.
It appears that many
"Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United
Nations and Liberal
Irwin Cotler's assertion that the
Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent
has "NO RIGHTS",
making the State, not the Natural
Parents the Protector of the Child..
Without Cause or
Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!
"In spite of credible revelations
dating back to April 2002 about Bill Graham, a sex addicted
bi-sexual sodomizing a 15 year old male prostitute named
Lawrence Metherel,
Paul Martin allowed Graham to remain
Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister - and eventually named
him to the portfolio of Minister of Defense.
"On Sept. 28/2005 a vote was held in Parliament to raise the
age of consent from 14 (one of the lowest age of consents in
the world) to 16 (an age which many still consider too low).
"Bill Graham, Paul Martin, and Anne
McLellan, on Sept. 28th, voted against raising the age of
consent to 16
We apologize that the
following figures have not been developed for the Province of BC
specifically. We hope to do this over time. We do know,
however that women often move to BC from Alberta and the rest of Canada
to have their divorces done here in BC where the
misandry of the Family Courts will
maximize their powers to destroy their husbands.
Children from fatherless homes account
for:
63% of youth suicides. (Source: US Dept.
of Health & Human Services, Bureau of the Census).
71% of pregnant teenagers. (Source: US
Dept. of Health & Human Services)
90% of all homeless and runaway
children.
70% of juveniles in state-operated
institutions come from fatherless homes (Source: U.S. Dept. of
Justice, Special Report, Sept 1988)
85% of all children that exhibit
behavioral disorders. (Source: Center for Disease Control).
80% of rapists motivated with displaced
anger. (Source: Criminal Justice & Behavior, Vol. 14, p. 403-26,
1978).
71% of all high school dropouts.
(Source: National Principals Association Report on the State of High
Schools).
75% of all adolescent patients in
chemical abuse centers. (Source: Rainbows for all God's Children).
85% of all youths sitting in prisons.
(Source: Fulton Co. Georgia jail populations, Texas Dept. of
Corrections 1992).
Children from fatherless
homes are:
11 times more likely to exhibit violent
behavior than children from intact "married" homes.
5 times more likely to commit suicide.
32 times more likely to runaway.
20 times more likely to have behavioral
disorders.
14 times more likely to commit rape.
9 times more likely to drop out of high
school.
10 times more likely to abuse chemical
substances.
9 times more likely to end up in
state-operated institutions.
20 times more likely to end up in
prison.
"37.9% of
fathers have no access/visitation rights."
(Source: p.6, col.II, para. 6, lines 4 & 5, Census Bureau
P-60, #173, Sept 1991.)
"40% of mothers reported that they had interfered with the
non-custodial father's visitation on at least one occasion, to punish
the ex-spouse." (Source: p. 449, col. II, lines 3-6, (citing
Fulton) Frequency of visitation by Divorced Fathers; Differences in
Reports by Fathers and Mothers. Sanford Braver et al, Am. J. of
Orthopsychiatry, 1991.)
"Overall,
approximately 50% of mothers "see no value in the father's continued
contact with his children...."
(Source: Surviving the Breakup, Joan Kelly & Judith
Wallerstein, p. 125) Only 11% of mothers value their husband's input
when it comes to handling problems with their kids. Teachers & doctors
rated 45%, and close friends & relatives rated %16.(Source: EDK
Associates survey of 500 women for Redbook Magazine. Redbook, November
1994, p. 36)
"The former
spouse (mother) was the greatest obstacle to having more frequent
contact with the children." (Source:
Increasing our understanding of fathers who have infrequent contact with
their children, James Dudley, Family Relations, Vol. 4, p. 281, July
1991.)
"A clear
majority (70%) of fathers felt that they had too little time with their
children." (Source: Visitation and the
Noncustodial Father, Mary Ann Kock & Carol Lowery, Journal of Divorce,
Vol. 8, No. 2, p. 54, Winter 1984.)
"Very few of
the children were satisfied with the amount of contact with their
fathers, after divorce." (Source:
Visitation and the Noncustodial Father, Koch & Lowery, Journal of
Divorce and Remarriage, Vol. 8, No. 2, p. 50, Winter 1984.)
"Feelings of anger towards their former spouses hindered effective
involvement on the part of fathers; angry mothers would sometimes
sabotage father's efforts to visit their children." (Source:
Ahrons and Miller, Am. Journal of Orthopsychiatry, Vol. 63. p. 442, July
1993.)
"Mothers may
prevent visits to retaliate against fathers for problems in their
marital or post-marital relationship."
(Source: Seltzer, Shaeffer & Charing, Journal of Marriage & the Family,
Vol. 51, p. 1015, November 1989.)
In a study: "Visitational
Interference - A National Study" by Ms. J Annette Vanini, M.S.W. and
Edward Nichols, M.S.W., it was found that 77% of non-custodial fathers
are NOT able to "visit" their children, as ordered by the court, as a
result of "visitation interference" perpetuated by the custodial parent.
In other words, non-compliance with court ordered visitation is three
times the problem of non-compliance with court ordered child support and
impacts the children of divorce even more. Originally published Sept.
1992
Child Support
Information from multiple
sources show that only 10% of all non-custodial fathers fit the
"deadbeat dad" category: 90% of the fathers with joint custody paid the
support due. Fathers with visitation rights pay 79.1%; and 44.5% of
those with NO visitation rights still financially support their
children. (Source: Census Bureau report. Series P-23, No. 173).
Additionally, of those not paying support, 66% are not doing so because
they lack the financial resources to pay (Source: GAO report:
GAO/HRD-92-39 FS).
The following is sourced from: Technical Analysis Paper No. 42, U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Income Security
Policy, Authors: Meyer and Garansky.
Custodial mothers who receive a support
award: 79.6%
Custodial fathers who receive a support
award: 29.9%
Non-custodial mothers who totally
default on support: 46.9%
Non-custodial fathers who totally
default on support: 26.9%
Judges and their elite
Star
Chamber entrench their power and status to rule over Canadians with
impunity and unbridled
narcissism.
Feminist and Homosexual Activists as Judges effect
their political agenda without the consent of the Canadian demographic.
They with full knowledge and intent (scripted in the sixties & seventies
by their Activist writers) circumvent due democratic process and
knowingly contravene the founding legal constructs of Canada in the BNA
& in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Activist Judges happily
and routinely breach the Trust placed in them by their employer, the
Canadian Taxpayer.
Lawyers routinely Entice into self-destruction and
financial rape vast numbers of families entering their doors.
Because of the Statutory self-regulation of the BC Law Society, we know
of no limiting factor to cap the Activism of the Judiciary other than
prosecuting Judges and Lawyers who exceed the powers granted them by
Statute.
The BC Law Society pimps BC women, and use them as
their hookers. With others (also conspicuously funded by the
Taxpayer), Law Society members instruct women to hook fathers and
families into the Courts and the financial ruin a "Legal Marriage"
entails. Children NEED this threat to their security to be
EXTERMINATED.
Faced with the entrenched Father Hatred and
Affirmative Action of the burgeoning civil service, boys and young men
despair. Having no vision for a Future or a university education,
they become prone to fulfill the Father Hatred prophecies of BC
university's Women's Studies faculties and Feminist Activists.
"Children of single parents were at
higher risk of physical abuse and of all types of neglect and were
overrepresented among seriously injured, moderately injured, and
endangered children. Compared with their counterparts living with both
parents, children in single parent families had:
a 77% greater risk of being
harmed by physical abuse (using the stringent Harm Standard) and a
63% greater risk of experiencing any countable physical abuse (using
the Endangerment Standard);
an 87% greater risk of being
harmed by physical neglect and a 165% greater risk of experiencing
any countable physical neglect;
a 74% greater risk of being
harmed by emotional neglect and a 64% greater risk of experiencing
any countable emotional neglect;
a 220% (or more than three
times) greater risk of being educationally neglected;
an approximately 80% greater
risk of suffering serious injury or harm from abuse or neglect;
an approximately 90% greater
risk of receiving moderate injury or harm as a result of child
maltreatment; and
a 120% (or more than two times)
greater risk of being endangered by some type of child abuse or
neglect."
2006-11-10
Top judges rebuke Tories Federal plan would allow police to help
appoint judiciary - workopolis.com; "Beverley
McLachlin, Canada's Chief Justice, along with a powerful council of
the country's top judges issued an unprecedented rebuke yesterday to
Justice Minister Vic Toews for hatching a plan to arbitrarily change
the way judges are chosen. The Canadian Judicial Council
expressed dismay that Mr. Toews is planning to introduce "significant
changes to the composition and functioning of the Judicial Advisory
Committees," secret groups which are set up in each region to vet
candidates for the 1,100 federal judgeships across the country.
Chief Justice McLachlin, who chairs the council, urged Mr. Toews to
include the judiciary and key legal bodies in any discussion of
changes to the committee vetting process."
We
need in the very least some kind of JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY ACT
which will look something like::
Divide the Law Society into two groups of
Judges and Practicing Lawyers to protect the Lawyers who would
make Cases against Judges. There would be some Law Society
Members who may practice as Barristers, and some as Solicitors,
but a Judge must RETIRE from the Practice of Law and
become unable to affect the Law Society while they act as a
Judge. On removal of a Judge for
Judicial Activism,
the Law Society may deny their return to Practice from
Retirement for specified cause, such as the case made during
an unsuccessful Criminal Charge of
Breach of Trust or Treason.
The Judges naturally divide into two bodies,
the Provincial and Federal Judicial Societies to parallel the
Provincial and Federal Courts. Membership in both Judicial
Societies must be precluded. Federal Judges would be tried
by Provincial Judges according to the
JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY ACT, and the Provincial Judges would
be tried by the Federal Judges. They could be tried both
in Tort and in Criminal Court for
Breach of Trust and for
Treason.
Make Judicial Appointments for a FIXED TERM
of no more than five years (Jimmy Pattison where are you when we
need you?)
Judicial Re-Appointment must meet a Test for
Judicial Re-Appointment which demonstrates the prescribed
Impartiality (that is an Activism Free record.) and Non-Infamy
with the Electorate.
Automatic Temporary Suspension Without Pay
for a Judge who is going to Trial in Tort or in Criminal
Court, pending its outcome.
Eradication
of
Freemasonry from the Judiciary and Law Societies. Both
are granted special privileges by Parliamentary Statute which
they receive In Trust.. Judicial Candidates and sitting
Judges must be vetted for Occult
practices resulting in Public Safety concerns such as
Pedophilia.
Pedophilia is an established part of Occult worship
(See
Malachi Martin among others) and is reported to be a
tolerated practice of some high ranking Judges.
Trial by Jury of Judges before non-allied and
non-associated Judges, e.g.. Federal
Judges
tried before Provincial Judges, visa versa..
NO SPECIAL
PROSECUTORS for Judges or other Public Servants being
tried.
Under the "federal" division of powers in the BNA
(Constitution Act, 1867)) Education falls into the Provincial
domain. A parallel Provincial Statute to amend the licensing
and Suspension of Teachers
would be necessary to stop the present use of our Schools for
Political Indoctrination by Activists. See also
Four Missions
Removal of judges from office, Oklahoma
Constitution
(a) In addition to other
methods and causes prescribed by the Constitution and laws,
the judges of any court, exercising judicial power under the
provisions of Article VII, or under any other provision, of
the Constitution of Oklahoma, shall be subject to removal
from office, or to compulsory retirement from office, for
causes herein specified, by proceedings in the Court on the
Judiciary.
(b) Cause for removal from
office shall be: Gross neglect of duty; corruption in
office; habitual drunkenness; commission while in office of
any offense involving moral turpitude;
gross partiality in office;
oppression in office; or other grounds as may be
specified hereafter by the legislature.
(c) Cause for compulsory
retirement from office, with or without compensation, shall
be mental or physical disability preventing the proper
performance of official duty, or incompetence to perform the
duties of the office"
"The Family Courts
are <generally> a bunch of second rate hangers-on
... build each other's businesses through
referrals...Family Law is a <parasitic> self-sustaining
Industry"
Habeas
Corpus : "literally, "you
may have the body". A Habeas
Corpus is a legal writ that protects an individual against arbitrary
imprisonment by requiring that any person arrested be brought before
a court for formal charge. If the charge is considered to be valid,
the person must submit to trial; if not, the person goes free. When
the law is suspended, then individuals can be imprisoned
indefinitely and without charge."
.....
"This
is one of those moments when you want to grab liberals by the lapels
and demand, "Well, what did you expect?" ... A group called the
National Center for Men has filed a lawsuit they are calling "Roe v.
Wade for Men." ... More than three decades
ago Roe vs. Wade gave women control of their reproductive lives but
nothing in the law changed for men. Women can now have sexual
intimacy without sacrificing reproductive choice. Women now have the
freedom and security to enjoy lovemaking without the fear of forced
procreation. Women now have control of their lives after an
unplanned conception. But men are routinely forced to give up
control, forced to be financially responsible for choices only women
are permitted to make, forced to relinquish reproductive choice as
the price of intimacy."
COMMENT: Roe
V. Wade was a "Femi-Narcissistic" decision, looking after the
interests of the Mother only. The principal established there
established was extrapolated into a Mother's "murder rights"
expressed in minimal sentences when murdering their children.
Equal Parenting eliminates much of this.
Father dealt difficult hand by the system
"Even last week, when the family court file of
Elaine and Leo Campione was released to the press -- in
significant measure because Mr. Campione didn't oppose the
media's bid to see it .. There is, to be frank, an
underlying perspective of feminist oppression from which all
else springs. .. Women are seen first as victims --
generally of male power and particularly of husband power -- and
presumed to be truth-tellers and good mothers until proven
otherwise. The starting point for men is that they are abusers
and deadbeat dads in the making unless they can prove the
contrary, and if it takes years for them to demonstrate that, oh
well."
Feminism is Socialism is Nazism, hence "Femi-Nazism"
"Anyone who knows anything of
history knows that great social
changes are impossible without
feminine upheaval. Social
progress can be measured exactly
by the social position of the
fair sex, the ugly ones
included."
-- Karl
Marx
"I feel that man-hating is an honorable and viable political
act." - Robin Morgan, Editor 'Ms. Magazine'
"We cant destroy the 'inequalities' between men and women until
we destroy marriage" - Robin Morgan
"Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that
the women's movement must concentrate on attacking this
institution. 'Freedom' for women cannot be won until the
abolition of marriage" - Sheila Cronin, leader of the feminist
organization N.O.W. (National Organization of Women)
"Men who are unjustly accused of rape can gain from the
experience" - Catherine Comins
"My feelings for men are the result of my experience. I have
little sympathy for them. LIke a Jew just released Dachau, I
watched the handsome young Nazi officer fall writhing to the
ground with a bullet to the stomach and I look briefly and walk
on. I dont even need to shrug. I simply dont care. What he was,
as a person, I mean, what his shames and yearnings were, simply
dont matter." - Marlyn French, The Woman's Room.
"All men are rapists and that's all they are"
- Marlyn French,
Authoress (Later Advisore to Al Gore's Presidential Campaign)
"The simple fact that every woman must be willing to be
identified as lesbian to be fully feminist" - (National NOW
Times, January, 1988)
"Marriage has existed for the benefit of men, and has been a
legally sanctioned method of control over women... We must work
to destroy it. The end of the institution of marriage is a
necessary condition for the 'liberation' of women. Therefore it
is important for us to encourage women to leave thier husbands
and not to live individually with men.... All of history must be
re-written in terms of 'oppression' of women. We must go back to
ancient female religions like WITCHCRAFT" - (From "The
Declaration of Feminism", November, 1971)
"I claim that rape exists anytime sexual intercourse occurs when
it is not initiated by the woman, out of her own genuine
affection and desire" - Robin Morgan
"Feminism was a project financed by the
Rockefeller family to get Moms out of the home so children
would be raised by the State. Children
will then grow come thinking of the State as their Father".
NOTE: We have no argument with the "Equal
Pay for Equal Work" principle. We oppose the
Affirmative Action
policies that has reduced employment standards and
generally cut off White Anglophone Males from
employment in the Public Service since the early
eighties. (StatsCan reports these White Males will
likely never be able to retire.)
Instead many
incompetent women and foreign "Migrants" were "fast
tracked" into careers in the Public Service when equally
qualified Canadian-born men were cast off as
"NONE OF
THE ABOVE". It's hard not to notice also the
malicious attack on children and the Family now being
perpetrated by the Public Service (with government
funding) in the name of
"FEMINISM" We
prefer to be more specific. Instead of "Feminism"
we prefer using the terms
"FEMINARCISSISM",
"FEMUNISM",
"HOMOSEXUALISM", and
"FEMI-NAZI".
The tip-off to
"Feminarcissism"
is a uniquely "Feminist"
anthropophagic double-talk which refuses to treat
men and women equally. Observe:
A "Femi-Nazi" is also
Narcissistic, but extends into
Eugenic Atheism which holds Human Life with contempt
if it isn't at the cutting edge of an evolutionary
ideal. A "Femi-Nazi" actively destroys life
(Fathers & children typically) who interfere with the
"Femi-Nazi's" objectives. Hitler, Stalin, and Pol
Pot were practicing
Eugenic Atheism in their ethnic cleansings of
Germany, Russia, and Cambodia, respectively.
Blind Eye to Murder: Britain, America, and the Purging
of Nazi Germany--A Pledge Betrayed - Google Search;
Reviewer: A reader, "In this unique
book, Bower takes up one of the most overlooked, yet
important questions in history -
what happened to the
Nazis and their collaborators after the war? And he
comes to a
disturbing
conclusion - nothing much, (in the West anyway.)
This
book meticulously analyzes the incompetence and outright
dereliction of duty which enabled so many Nazis not only
to remain free and unconvicted after the war, but also
permitted them to rise to the top of West Germany's post
war elite. More importantly, it shows how the commercial
and class interests of the Anglo-American ruling classes
overrode their nationalism, and caused them to spare
elements of the German ruling class from
de-Nazification. A book that is well worth reading to
anyone who wants to know the truth about what
happened after World War Two."
Multilateral Agreement on
Investment, by Anup Shah
"We had a potential nightmare in the form of the
Multilateral Agreement on Investment (MAI).
An almost unheard of agreement that was being
discussed about investment rights and opening up
nations for freer trade. ..
However many, many people feared that this would
be accompanied by grave social and environmental
consequences, due to the wording of the MAI
text. Due to the provisions in the text there
would be a real transfer of decision-making
power to unaccountable private corporations,
making it more difficult for elected governments
to pass and apply laws for their public's
interest, with the effect of reducing democracy
so that people are locked in to corporate-rights
agreements (all under the banner of "Free
Trade!!")."
For
us, of course, it is not Parliament that needs to be "Blown Up" but the
Star Chamber and the back-door Courtrooms
of
these unelected, Evil and treacherous
Activist Judges.
"The most
merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant
members is to kill it.",Margaret Sanger,
Women
and
the New Race (Eugenics Publ. Co., 1920, 1923)
On blacks, immigrants and
indigents:
"...human weeds,' 'reckless breeders,'
'spawning... human beings who never should have been born." Margaret
Sanger,
Pivot
of Civilization, referring to
immigrants and poor people
On sterilization & racial
purification:
Sanger believed that, for the purpose of racial
"purification,
"couples should be rewarded who chose
sterilization" Birth Control in America, The Career of
Margaret
Sanger,
by
David Kennedy, p. 117, quoting a 1923 Sanger speech.
On the right of married couples
to bear children:
"Couples should be required to submit
applications to have a child",she wrote in her "Plan
for Peace." Birth Control Review, April 1932
On the purpose of birth
control:
"The purpose in promoting birth control was "to
create a race of
thoroughbreds,"
she wrote in the Birth Control Review, Nov. 1921 (p. 2)
On the rights of the
handicapped and mentally ill, and racial minorities:
"More
children
from
the fit, less from the unfit -- that is the chief aim of birth
control." Birth Control Review, May 1919, p. 12
Presently, the burden of proof is on the Accused to prove
themselves innocent (unless you are in a Criminal Court), Rare is the Judge who enforces Perjury laws against a
woman.
Erin Pizzey,
who devoted her life to helping
battered wives talks for the
first time about the abuse she
suffered at the hands of both
her parents and how it convinced
her that women are every bit as
cruel as men.
...read
"The
nuclear family must be destroyed ... Whatever its
ultimate meaning, the break-up of families now is an
objectively revolutionary process"
Linda Gordon
"We
can't destroy the inequities between men and women until we destroy marriage"
Robin Morgan, Ms. Magazine
;
"I feel that
'man-hating' is an honourable and viable political act,
that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against
the class that is oppressing them."
Robin Morgan, Editor Ms. Magazine
"I
want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a
high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the
mouth of a pig" ...
"Marriage as an institution developed
from rape as a practice"
...
"Heterosexual intercourse is the
pure, formalized expression of contempt for women's
bodies"-
Andrea Dworkin
"The
institution of sexual intercourse is anti-feminist"
"Feminism is the theory,
lesbianism is the practice" -
Ti-Grace Atkinson
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.
Teachers
would be necessary to stop the present use of our Schools for
Political Indoctrination by Activists. See also
disturbing
conclusion - nothing much, (in the West anyway.)
