"Natural
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
"Natural
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage
bill"
16.10 Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to
conform
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal
BREACH OF TRUST"
FYI,
the ideas that the State assigns
Rights &
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from
pre-war Nazi Germany. Under the British system
rights are not State-given, but God Given.
Buying into the Court's position that what
rights remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same
position that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and
Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.
In
"Women and the Process of Constitutional Reform"
McLellan warns that <Horrors!>
"Provincial
Legislatures may impose a presumption of Joint Custody...
and perpetuate the domination of men over women"
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and
they will likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these
days".
This is completely FALSE. The Judges
are Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT
CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
1649, only
PARLIAMENT has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was
only observed and documented by individuals sent out by the
newly Norman Crown after the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the
laws and customs of the various peoples of Britain..
This was done with a view to aggregate existing customs
which may vary across the land, into a unified body of
Laws. The Authority quoted by the Commoners in their
administration of
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
Bible and
principles of
Danelaw
The process of documentation took only a
couple of hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body
of Law which was historical, popular, and has served in the
intervening centuries as a Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
Instead their position to promote the
"rights" of a "Parent" in the widest sense of the
word, making NO distinction between
NATURAL PARENTS and
wannaabe
Legal Parents. They have bowed to
University of
Victoria's assertion that the SCC's
Trociuk
Decision
"endorses a Heterosexual View of the Family and must be
ignored", legitimizing the ongoing
Child
Trafficking by the State which views
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in
the lucrative Child
Adoption Market They refuse to be hampered by prior
obligations to that pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can
Veto an Adoption.
It appears that many
"Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United
Nations and Liberal
Irwin Cotler's assertion that the
Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent
has "NO RIGHTS",
making the State, not the Natural
Parents the Protector of the Child..
Without Cause or
Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!
"In spite of credible revelations dating back to April 2002
about Bill Graham, a sex addicted bi-sexual sodomizing a 15
year old male prostitute named
Lawrence Metherel,
Paul Martin allowed Graham to remain
Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister - and eventually named
him to the portfolio of Minister of Defense.
"On Sept. 28/2005 a vote was held in Parliament to raise the
age of consent from 14 (one of the lowest age of consents in
the world) to 16 (an age which many still consider too low).
"Bill Graham, Paul Martin, and Anne McLellan, on Sept. 28th,
voted against raising the age of consent to 16
"The Family Courts
are <generally> a bunch of second rate hangers-on
... build each other's businesses through
referrals...Family Law is a <parasitic> self-sustaining
Industry"
Habeas
Corpus : "literally, "you
may have the body". A Habeas
Corpus is a legal writ that protects an individual against arbitrary
imprisonment by requiring that any person arrested be brought before
a court for formal charge. If the charge is considered to be valid,
the person must submit to trial; if not, the person goes free. When
the law is suspended, then individuals can be imprisoned
indefinitely and without charge."
.....
Skeletons in the Closet, a film drawn from the dramatized lives
of families living with a protected
Pedophile and the mental
illness it may create when a loving, faithful, Victim keeps the
Secret. This is shockingly
common. The Secret is their Power -
BREAK IT!
(You would be well advised to stay away from the Public Servant.)
FMEP = Family Maintenance Enforcement Program
Professional Employees Association (PEA) - Family
Maintenance and Enforcement Program (FMEP)
They
say it is their
"Policy" to NEVER return OVERPAYMENTS on Child Support.
They say it is their "Policy" or to NOT
acknowledge Payments to the Payee directly without going through
their Office, saying such payments are "Gifts" only,
and will NOT be considered by them to be payments of Child
Support. They say their
"Policy" of removing
Passports and Drivers' Licenses, and spreading around your SINs
to strangers NOT involved in taxation is justified by the
"Greater Good"of defending a
Child's Right to receive
Support Payments. They claim Themis is a "Creation of Statute",
exercising only the powers given it by Parliament. See
Issues: Breach of
Trust of a Public Officer, Criminal
Themis operates as
Chris Beresford's
mercenary
Bounty Hunter.
We have known of Moms who, having seen what Themis has done to
Dad, have waived payment of Child Support to stop
Themis' attacks, but Themis has refused to stop.
"Carol
Rhodes, former Friend of the Court Investigator ... recently did
an interview with host Richard Farr on the
KRights.com Internet Radio station. Michigan Shared parenting
activist
Robert Pedersen of
A Child’s Right was also interviewed. To listen, click
here.
Lawyers consistently estimate the homosexual
fraction of the Law Societies & Judiciaries as "forty-something"
percent. That is, a randomly selected Judge or Lawyer is
about thirty times more likely to be homosexual than the
population at large. (BTW, a randomly selected Homosexual
is about forty times more likely to be a
Pedophile than a
randomly selected Canadian.).
The Judiciary now claims the right to
INTERPRET whatever meaning they want into the written Statutes
of Parliament, and refuse to be bound by any literal, contextual
reading of a Statute of Parliament.
By these nefarious
means
Activist Judges
have "interpreted" the Charter to give themselves
Homosexual Marriage
and with it eliminated Natural Parents' rights, obliging - they
claim - our Parliament & Legislatures to replace the term
NATURAL PARENT
with the term
LEGAL PARENT.
Without the knowledge or
consent of the Canadian people, these
Activist Judges
have robbed you of the right to be the Legal Parent of your own
Natural Children.,
We are noticing too that they
are lying to us about what
COMMON LAW is. Ask a few lawyers what Common Law is,
and we guess they will tell you the Lie that it is whatever is
commonly being Ordered by
the Judges at any point in time, and
is therefore very dynamic and cannot be defined. We can
happily tell you this is completely FALSE, and is instead an
admission of their malicious intent.
In practice in BC at least it still gets
worse! The Tables claim to result in a dollar value for
the Standard of Living in each household which is then to be
equilibrated.
BC Judges then show themselves to be
incapable of doing simple math problems by taking the simple
difference between the Table values for Mom and Dad
respectively, and Ordering Dad to pay Mom the Difference!!!!.
What they should have done of course is to divide the difference
by two, and Order the halved difference to be paid. So every
BC Child Support
Order out there, it would appear is TWICE the amount that
should have been Ordered from the fraudulent Tables, and the Dads should have a big Credit
Balance at
the FMEP
which they should be able to demand returned to them with
Penalties and Interest..
"We believe that
Joanne Platt, a lawyer employed by
Themis Program Management and Consulting Ltd. a subsidiary
of
Maximus Inc., is a criminal and we are attempting to obtain
further information to assist us to bring her to justice so she
can be punished for her alleged crimes
"On August 22, 2008, Joanne Platt quietly slipped intOn August
22, 2008, Themis Program Management and Consulting Ltd. (Themis)
employee Joanne Platt, quietly slipped into a courtroom in
Victoria, and was observed by several witnesses to be
communicating with Mr. Justice Peter Leask by some system of non
verbal communication. Mr. Justice Leask would not co-operate.
Lawyers consistently estimate the
homosexual fraction of
the Law Societies & Judiciaries as "forty-something" percent.
That is,
a randomly selected Judge or Lawyer is about thirty
TIMES more likely to be homosexual than the population at large
The FMEP and the
Attorney General argued strongly that the wording of the FMEA
makes them exempt from the Privacy Acts.
Themis and the
Attorney General will .. defend their actions in violating the
Privacy Act in disseminating my Social Insurance Number without
my authorization.
"Themis
/ FMEP has reversed position:
They ARE subject to Judicial Review!!"
"..
everyone who is subject to the arbitrary rulings of the FMEP can
now apply for Judicial Review to correct injustice.
" .. anything that you recall having been said in court my
be used to justify the Judicial Review.
40%
is the minimum Fee they will usually demand, and would go for
everything,
but the Law Societies name the upper limit at 60% which some
firms recognize.
"Natural
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
"Natural
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"
16.10
Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to conform
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal BREACH
OF TRUST"
FYI,
the ideas that the State assigns
Rights &
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from pre-war
Nazi Germany. Under the British system rights are
not State-given, but God Given.
Buying into the Court's position that what rights
remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same position
that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and Canadian Children
are at birth the property of the Courts.
In
"Women and the Process of Constitutional Reform"
McLellan warns that
<Horrors!>
"Provincial
Legislatures may impose a presumption of Joint
Custody... and perpetuate the domination of men over
women"
"I am writing on behalf of
Darrin Bruce White. I am the oldest of his four
children. My name is
Ashlee A D Barnett-White. ...
No one would listen to my father , no one
would give him a chance to speak. ... My dad was an abused
husband, he was abused by his wife, and the justice system.
... He was a kind man who fought a good fight but no matter
what he did or said, he could never win with this system.
Things need to change for all fathers going through this
same thing. We need to help, too many kids go without a
father because of this , too many kids are hurt."
Ashlee A D Barnett-White, Eldest Daughter
He was also paying $439 a month to support an
older
child from a previous marriage.
He had to take stress leave from his job as a train engineer
for BC Rail. Master Baker ordered Darren out of his home on
two days notice.
Presently, the burden of proof is on the Accused to prove
themselves innocent (unless you are in a Criminal Court), Rare is the Judge who enforces Perjury laws against a
woman.
The common practice in BC Courts when Fathers
do not pay Child Support -
which most of the time is merely
Imputed - is to send non-paying Father to Prison until he
or his family members pay the fees imposed by the Judge.
Even when mothers agree that Child Support
should no longer be paid, we find that the
Family Enforcement
agencies, which are private contractors functioning as
Bounty Hunters, typically refuse to end their claim on the
father's income,.
"I get government cheques..... you stupid
Canadians.. I get government cheques."
Canadian Affirmative Action programs coupled with massive
immigration from "non-traditional" sources to accommodate UN commitments
precluded white males and many white females from employment and progressive
employment in government offices.
These same White Males are now routinely subjected to
Imputed
Income by Family court Judges - the majority of whom are beneficiaries of
Affirmative Action programs - when Dad's incomes aren't as high as the Judge
expects them to be.
In
"Women and the Process of Constitutional Reform"
McLellan warns that
<Horrors!>
"Provincial
Legislatures may impose a presumption of Joint
Custody... and perpetuate the domination of men over
women"
"Conservatives are committed to Shared Parenting. The
national party “Policy Declaration” that was passed by delegates
at our March 2005 Montreal convention
says
clearly that: Shared Parenting: is an objective of the
Conservative Party of Canada.
A Conservative
Government will make the necessary changes to the Divorce Act to
ensure that in the event of a marital breakdown, the Divorce Act
will allow both parents and all grandparents to maintain a
meaningful relationship with their children and grandchildren,
unless it is clearly demonstrated not to be in the best
interests of the children".
Presently, the burden of proof is on the Accused to prove
themselves innocent (unless you are in a Criminal Court), Rare is the Judge who enforces Perjury laws against a
woman.
World Health Organization (WHO) gags unbiased DV studies, demands
falsified reporting on Violence Against Women
".... The Steering Committee of the WHO Study agreed that interviews
with men should not be included ..."
"In situations where very low levels of violence are documented or
there are results that are otherwise not expected, the findings should
be discussed with key informants and different community groups before
being widely disseminated."
In
"Women and the Process of Constitutional Reform"
McLellan warns that
<Horrors!>
"Provincial
Legislatures may impose a presumption of Joint
Custody... and perpetuate the domination of men over
women"
If you don't want to go nuts in the Family Law Industry, you'd
better prepare yourself to recognize
Peck's previously
undescribed psychological class of what he calls "Evil" people.
"M. Scott Peck, M.D. <Psychiatrist> wrote a most important book for
our times,
People of the Lie, The Hope For Healing Human Evil, published in
1983 by Simon & Schuster. It’s a study of human evil. Peck said he
chose the title “because lying is both a cause and a
manifestation of evil. It is partly by their lying that we recognize
the evil.”
Peck’s analysis of the Mylai massacre, its massive cover-up and the
deceptions made by our government in the Viet Nam war should not be
missed for its lessons for us today."
The university community tells us that at
least one of the Status of Women
university profs is not just a run of the mill Communist...
she's a self professed MAOIST!!! The difference
we're told is that a MAOIST believes in
FYI, we're told by female friends that
we need to expand our vocabulary into the pro-family
"First Wave Feminists" of the
late
1800's who fought for women's
equality and the anti-family
"Second Wave Feminists" of the 1960s who were the
anti-marriage "Femi-Nazis" who are typically the Marxist
Lesbians who are now maintaining control of our government
offices at the Courts, the Schools, and the University's
faculties of Law and Women's Studies and Social Work..
These are the evil SOWs who have created the
doctrines of "justified" deceit, lying, and theft in the Family
Courts to make "Reparations" for "wrongs done to women" over all
centuries since civilization began, and leave women with
all the financial power, and men with none.
We say it is
Hedy Fry, and these
"Second Wave Feminists" /
Status of Women /
Women's Studies types that need to be eradicated from tax
funded positions and be forced to make Reparations to the
thousands of Fathers and their families whose lives who have
been destroyed by them since the sixties. We need also the
restoration of the Enticement
& Seduction provisions of Common Law which these SOWs had
struck by Statute.
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.
More:
More:
