Remember, Remember the 5th of November,
The gunpowder treason and plot, I see no reason
why Gunpowder Treason should ever be forgot

Guy Fawkes thumbnail

    ● EP-BC Home About  Issues Testimonials News  Reference   Fun Stuff Members


Issues Area Home

1215:  MAGNA CARTA, JUNE 15TH
Issues Summaries
Abortion Veto for Dads
Adoption Veto for Dads
Adopted Children Disallowed NPs
Affirmative Action
Age Of Consent
Anti-Depressants, Drug Induced Suicide
Battered Woman Syndrome
BC Vital Statistics Act Misandry
BC Legislature MUST
Big Brother, Micro-Management
Bill C-22
Birth Rate Displacement
"Best interests of the Child" = "Blank Cheque"
Breach of Trust
Carbon Tax funds Global Government
"Case Law" is NOT Law
CCA Wood and Playgrounds
Child Support Tables / SOW Fraud
"Child's Right" or "Parents' Right"
Child & Human Trafficking righs of CBA
Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges
Compulsory Drugging of Children
Corren Agreement
Court Ordered Sexism
Credit Crisis, Currency Replacment
Custody Orders not Enforced
Debtor's Prison Reinstituted
Day Care Universal
Deadbeat Dad Propaganda
Disabled parents
DISS = Divorce Initiated Suicide Synd.
Domestic Violence Propaganda
Division of Assets
Enticement Seduction Tort Claims Precluded
Estate Taxes Thieve a Child's Inheritance
EU = European Union:  Nazi Brainchild
Euthanasia, Spousal
Ex Parte Orders
False Accusations
Father Hatred Propaganda
Fatherlessness, State Imposed
Federal Reserve / Fiat Currency
FEMA Camps, Martial Law
Femi-Narcissism
Feminism = Socialism = Nazism
Fitness Test for Natural Parents in Divorce
Fitness Test for Students: "Transitions"
FMEP = Family Maintenance Enforcement
Forgiveness is NOT Compulsory
Franklin Scandal, Conspiracy of Silence
Freedom of Speech
Friendly Parent Rule, Max. Contact
Fundamental Justice
Glass-Steagall Act Repealed
Globalism is Treason
Habeas Corpus Abandoned
"Hate Crime" Speech  Police
HELP = Human Early Learning Partnerships
Homofacism
Homosexual Violence
Homosexual Activism, Gay Manifesto
Homosexual Marriage
"Human Rights” Commissions in Canada
Imputed Income:  Fraudulent CS Orders
Inheritance Theft: Grey & Black Widow
Judicial Accountability, Removal of Judges
Judicial Activism is Breach of Trust
Judicial Falsification of Court Transcripts
Judicial Freemasonry is Racketeering
Judicial Globalization is Treason
Judicial Interpretation
Judicial Racketeering, Law Societies' Rackets
Kinship Families / Grandparents
Lawyers in the Legislatures
Lawyers Lying in Court, Self Regulation Fail
Legal Abuse Syndrome
Letters to MP
Letters to MLA
Letters to Editor
Lisbon Treaty (2007) is Treason
Malicious Mother Syndrome
Malicious Prosecution
Misandry = Hatred of Males
Monetary Crisis:  "Money as Debt"
Move Aways
Narcissism
Natiional Sovreignity
Natural Parents Rights Eliminated, SSM
NAU = North American Union
NDP = "No Dads Party"
Net Neutrality:  Keep Internet Free!!
No Fault Divorce
NCR = Not Criminally Responsible
Oath Keepers
Parliament MUST
Parental Alienation
Parental Authority Usurped by Teachers..
Parental Kidnapping
Parenting Time Presumption
Passport & DL Removal
Paternity Denied, Birth Registration
Paternity Fraud, Birth Registration
Pedophiles Fear Dads New
Pedophiles in Public Service
Petitions
Poofy Judges
Predatory Pregnancy
Protestant Revolution, BBC
PPP = Public Private Partnerships, Public Assets
QE = Quantitative Easing
Sexual Abuse by a Public Officer
Sex Change Surgery
Shadow Government
Sole Custody is Child Abuse
Special Prosecutors for Homo's & Judges
Star Chamber's Secret Overlords
SOW = Status of Women, KILL IT!!!!
Stockholm Syndrome Paradigm Shift
Straw Man Redemption, Free Man
Supremacy of Parliament
Target Legislation
Teachers displacing Parents
Teachers Seducing Students
Tracts and Flyers
Treasonous Public Officers not Prosecuted
Transcripts & Documents altered by Judges
UNCRC = UN Convention..Rights of the Child
Uptick Rule Repealed 2007
"Women's Shelters" = Lesbian Gulags

Notable Authorities





















Albrecht, Katherine :  RFID Spychips
Alexander,  Rachel:  Shared Parenting
Angry Harry
Annett, Kevin: Child Trafficking in BC
Asher, Jeffrey
Baskerville, Stephen: "Taken .. Custody
Beatley, Terry:  UNCRC Vs Parental Rights
Baxter, Dorian: Canada Courtwatch
Beck, Glenn Beck: World Government
Bennett, Richard: Purpose Driven Church
Blick, Edward:  Global Warming & Marxism
Blumner,Court Ordered Sexism
Briffault, Robert: Briffault's Law
Burrows, Lynette: Homo Adoption
Caradori, Gary: Franklin Cover-up Investigator
Carley, Dr. Rebecca: Vaccinations
Carr, William Guy:  Pawns in the Game
Christie, Doug:  Freedom of Speech
Chopra, Dr. Shiv: Health Canada
Clarke, Christine:  BC Conservatives
Clifford Dean:   Freeman
Coulter, Ann: Free Speech
Cools, Senator Anne:  Lying Lawyers
Coffman, Dr. Michael:  Global Warming
Coleman, John:  Global Warming Fraud
Coleman, Dr. John (MI6) Comittee of 300
Coren, Michael:  Islamophobia, Homophobia
Crane, Ian:  Codex Alimentarius Scam
Cromwell, Oliver: Supremacy / Parliament
Cuddy, Dennis L. "Power Elite"
Cumbey, Constance :  New Age Nazism
Cummins, John:  BC Conservative Party
Decamp, John: Franklin Cover-up
Delaney, Chris : "No HST in BC!"
Dioguardi, Joe:  Saving US / Debtors' Prison
Dodd, Norman:  NWO Fabian Socialists
Doomsday Preppers
Duane, James:"Don't Talk to Police"
Dutton, Don:  RADAR, "Rethinking DV"
EP-Australia
Estulin, Daniel:  Bilderberg Group
Evans, Stanton: "Blacklisted, Joe McCarthy"
Farage, Nigel:  UKIP, EU Titanic
Farrell, Warren:  Why Men Earn More
Fathers-4-Justice-UK
Federer, Bill: Endang'd Speeches, Quran
Fischer, Greg:  Family Preservation Festival
Fogal, Connie:  No NAU
Forseth, MP Paul:  FTSOTC Panelist
Fromm, Paul:  Free Speech, CAFE
Gage, Richard: Architects & Engineers 9/11
Gairdner William
Galloway, Roger:   FTSOTC Panelist
Geldof, Sir Bob:  The Love..
Gerrish, Brian:  EU's "Common Purpose"
Griffin, G. Edward:  Fed Reserve
Grignon, Paul:  "Money As Debt"
Gunderson, Ted:  FBI, Protected Pedophiles
Haeck, Lisa:  Sexual Abuse
Haines, Bruce, QC: Justice Review
Hein, Arnie:  "Cross My Heart" EP Trek 2005
Hiebert, MP Russ:  Human Rights Commission
Hill, MP Jay: EP Legislation
Hinton , Betty:  Status of Women's "Hit List"
Holland, Lary: "GET OFF THE BENCH"
Horowitz, David:  Islamofacism, Universites
Howse, Torm
Hunt, Dave:  Woman / Beast
Iserbyt, Charlotte: Dumbing Down
Jones, Alex
Kah, Gary: Obama, Vatican, Globalization
Kay, Barbara, National Post
Kennedy, John F:  Assassination 1963
Kernberg, Dr. Otto: Personality Disorder
Kerkman, Larry :  CRISPE
Keyes, Alan :
Khodeir, Lucien:  Child-Support Guidelines
Knight, Robert: Obama's "Radical Rulers"
Kruk, Edward: Child Custody
Lafantaisie, Michele:  CAS, CCA wood
Leslie, Sarah: "Pied Pipers of Purpose"
Levant, Ezra: HRT, Islam, Freedom of Speech
LInde, Carey: Statutory Ammendments
Lively, Scott:  "Pink Swastika"
Loftus, Elizabeth: Recovered Memories Myth
Luther, Martin: "Sola Scriptura"
Macdonald, Peter: "Taxcap" limits Debt
Machon, Annie:  Ex-MI5
Makow , Henry PhD: "Save the Males"
Man, Woman, & Myth
Matrisciana, Caryl:  Islam Rising, FITNA
Martin, Malachi: Globalization, Occult
McManus, John:  Stopping NAU
McKay, Dr. Marty
McLean, Candis
MacKenzie, Rob:  EP Trek 2006
Menard, Robert: "Bursting Bubbles"
McQuaid, Robert: Fix CAS
Millar, David
Mills, Dennis: MP Targetted by Homsexuals
Monckton, Lord Christopher
Monarchy, David Starkey
Monteith, Dr. Stanley:  Aides / Luciferians
Morris, Dick: G-20 Vs US Sovereignty
Murtari, John:  NCP Hunger Striker
Nash, Dave:  Cross Canada Run
Nazanin:  Persian Beauty for a Free Iran
Neufeld, Gordon: Hold - Kids
Nicholson, Robert:  BC's Protected Pedophiles
Nicolosi, Joseph:  Homosexuality
Norton, Bob:  Family Court Watcher
O'Connor, Matt: Original F4J-UK
PAFE = Planetary Alliance, Fathers in Exile
Palin, Sarah
Paul, Dr. Ron:  Sound Money
Peck, Dr. Scott: "People of the Lie"
Pedersen, Rob: EP Bike Trek US, 2007
Pellman, Adrian, LLB:  Judicial Activism
Perloff, James: Shadows of Power
Phenomenon: The Lost Archives
Pizzey, Erin: Women's Shelter Scam
Plywood Man, NWT
Protestant Revolution, BBC
Quigley, Carroll: Banking, Globalization
Rhodes, Carol: Child Support
Riplinger, Gail: Luciferian Bibles
Roberts, Carey
Roberts, Elise:  False Allegation of Abuse
Roscoe, Peter:  Judicial Bigotry
Russo, Aaron: NAU, CFR, Rockefellers
Ruppert, Michael C
Saburido, Jacqueline:  Don't Drink
Sacks. Glenn
Secret Files of the Inquisition
Schlafly, Phyllis:  Global Governance
Simons, Frank: Courts From Hell
Schafer, Nancy:  Child Trafficking at CPS
Schiff, Peter:  Currency Crisis, Debt Ceiling
Shafarevich, Igor:  The Socialist Phenomenon
Short, David:  St. John's Anglican
Shrimpton, Michael , QC:  Intelligence
Shrout, Winston: Common Law
Silverman, Earl:  Domestic Abuse against Men
SJCA - FTSOTC 48 Recom's
Simpson, Kari:  Road Kill Radio
Smith, Dr. Helen,  "Men on Strike"
Smith, Ron:  DC Rally, Drugging of Children
Soever, Alar:  SOW's Child Support Fraud
Sodhi, Eeva
Somerville, Margaret:“Same-Sex Marriage”
Still, Bill:  "Money Masters", "Mystery of Oz"
Stopps, Gordon  Vs Just Ladies, BCHRT
Stormer, John:  Betrayed ..  Bench
Story, Christopher:  "Perestroika Dec.
Sutton, Anhony:  Wall Street & Hitler
Taylor, Captain Tony: "Fatherless Day"
Trociuk Darrell, BC Birth Registration
Tyndale, William, "God's Outlaw", RIP 1536
V for Vendetta / Guy Fawkes the Hero
van Gogh, Theo:  Islamic Violence, RIP 2005
Vellacott, MP Maurice
Ventura, Jesse:  Conspiracy Theory
Vieira, Dr. Edwin:  Fiat Empire
Wagener, William
Wallace, Tom:  Sharia Law in UK & US
Warren, Elizabeth: Collapse Middle Class
Watson, Paul:  EU's Nazi  Origins
Wilberforce, William: Slave Trade Act, 1807
William III & Mary II:  "Bill of Rights" 1689
Wooldridge, Nancy:  Canadian Grans
World, Gordon:  Sexualizing BC Children
Youth Protecting Youth (YPY), UVic
Zepezauer, Frank:  Feminist Crusades

Your Articles

Let Ex Husbands Be Fathers
Perception vs Reality
Some Facts...
Both Parents Vital
Broken Homes, Bleak Future
Justice Review
Fatherneed
Rights of fathers Ignored?

Petitions, Class Action

Support one of over 50 class-actions against unconstitutional 'sole custody' by Indiana Civl Rights Council

thetruthandjusticefoundation.org

Support one of over 50 class-actions against unconstitutional 'sole custody' by Indiana Civl Rights Council

BC Statutory Amendments

Your Letters to an MP

Your Letters to an MP:  HOME

Letters to MP: I have $104.58 left over after paying child support

Post New Letters to a Member of BC Legislative Assembly (MLA) here

Your Letters to an MLA

Your Letters to MLA: HOME

Post New Letters to a Member of a Legislative Assembly (MLA) here

Your Letters to an Editor

Your Letters to an Editor: HOME

Post your New Letters to an Editor here 

Senator Anne Cools, FTSOTC Chair on False Accusations & Lying Lawyers

Senator Anne Cools, formerly Liberal, now Conservative, on False Accusations &
Law Societies' permitting Lawyers to Lie in Court

"'..  mothers and fathers should have equal rights in the raising of their children, regardless of marital break down"

Anne Cools - Google Search
Anne Cools - Google Video

Canadian Bill s-12, senator cools - Google Search

"Honorable senators know that I have studied a terrible and pernicious heart of darkness that has developed in our court system, being the use of FALSE ACCUSATIONS in civil justice.

"This is the mischief of litigating parties, usually mothers, suddenly within the context of divorce and within child custody proceedings falsely accusing the other party, usually fathers, of the sexual abuse of their own children.    ,,,    

"These FALSE ACCUSATIONS are often made with the overt or covert complicity of their lawyers. They are a lethal weapon in the business of parental alienation. They are a tool for achieving sole custody of children and creating fatherlessness."




2004-06-08  SENATOR ANNE COOLS LEAVES LIBERAL FOLD TO JOIN CONSERVATIVES  

Senator Anne Cools Runs Away With The Suns's 10 Top Women Poll, Kevin Connor, TO Sun

2004-06-08  Liberal senator < Anne Cools >  goes Conservative

1997-10-28 Child Custody and Access Reform, Special Joint Committee Established

Erin PizzeyMore:  Issues:  Cools, Senator Anne
Issues: False Accusations;
Isues Women's Shelters' Scam
News:  Liberal Hedy Fry / Status of Women (SOW):
News:  Cross, Pamela:Feminist Law:  Female Accusers must not be required to face those they accuse of Violence;
Issues:  Domestic Violence Scam & "Women's Studies" Propaganda
Issues:  Pizzey, Erin: Women's Shelter Scam;
Issues:  "Women's Shelter" Gulags:  Lesbian Brainwashing & Seduction Camps
Issues:  Cools, Senator Anne: Lying Lawyers;
News:  Liberal Hedy Fry / Status of Women (SOW):
Issuess:  False Accusations;
Issues:  Child Trafficking by Public Officers & Judges

Liberal Irwin Cotler:  "Natural Parents have NO RIGHTS"

Irwin Cotler, former Liberal "Justice" Minister robbed Canadians of their NATURAL PARENTS' Rights

Irwin Cotler - Google Search;
Irwin Cotler - Google Video


"Natural Parents have NO RIGHTS....  ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....

"Natural Parents' Rights now  gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"

16.10 Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to conform to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal BREACH OF TRUST"


FYI, the ideas that the State assigns Rights & Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from pre-war Nazi Germany.   Under the British system rights are not State-given, but God Given.

Buying into the Court's position that what rights remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same position that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.

More:  News:  Cotler, Irwin:  "Natural Parents have NO RIGHTS...;
News:  European Union;
Issues:  Paul Watson:  Nazi Origins of European Union;;;
Issues: G. Edward  Griffin ;
Issues: Fabian Socialism;

Liberal Anne McLellan says "Joint Custody Perpetuates the domination of men over women"


Former Liberal Justice Minister, Deputy Prime Minister

Anne McLellan , MP - Google Search

In "Women and the Process of Constitutional Reform" McLellan warns that <Horrors!> "Provincial Legislatures may impose a presumption of Joint Custody... and perpetuate the domination of men over women"  

The Liberal Party and Child Sexual Abuse


More:  News:  McLellan , Liberal Anne "Joint Custody Perpetuates the domination of men over women"

Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges and Legal Oligarchy

Chapter VII. The English Common Law. Section 57. The Norman Conquest

A beautiy of British  Common Law is that it is STATIC, and NOT DYNAMIC as these Activist Judges would have you think.

Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and they will likely tell you it is "Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say "Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these days"

This is completely FALSE.  The Judges are Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever.  Since 1649, only PARLIAMENT has the Capacity to make Law.

British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was only observed and documented by individuals sent out by the newly Norman Crown after the Norman Conquest of 1066  to observe and codify the laws and customs of the various peoples of Britain..  This was done with a view to aggregate existing customs which may vary across the land,  into a unified body of Laws.  The Authority quoted by the Commoners in their administration of Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the Bible and principles of Danelaw

The process of documentation took only a couple of hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body of Law which was historical, popular, and has served in the intervening centuries as a Benchmark against which Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".  It does NOT change.

More:   Issues:  Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges and Legal Oligarchy;
Issues:  "Judicial Interpretation" to pervert Statutes of Parliament;
Issues:  Judicial Activism is Breach of Trust;
Issues:  Judicial Globalization is Treason

McKenzie & Pedersen, the "Two Robs",
Equal Parenting Bike Trek US 2006, 2007...

Robb MacKenzie Equal Parenting Bike Trek - Google Search;
Robb MacKenzie Equal Parenting Bike Trek - Google Video

Rob Pederson, Equal Parenting - Google Search;
Robert Pederson, Equal Parenting - Google Video

Cycling4Children.com Equal Parenting Bike Trek's photostream

More:  Issues:  McKenzie & Pedersen, the "Two Robs", Equal Parenting Bike Trek US 2006, 2007...;
Issues:  Smith, Ron:  DC Family Preservation Rally, Compulsory Drugging of Children;
Issues:  Compulsory Drugging of Children, Thymerisol;

Beware of the "Parental Rights" IMPOSTER!!!!

"Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights"

Be on the lookout for the "Parent's Rights" IMPOSTER.  Insist on "Natural Parents Only", please!

It comes as a big surprise to us that many groups that present themselves as "Parents Rights" groups  REFUSE to defend the  NATURAL PARENT, and  and to demand RESTORATION of Natural Parents Rights taken from Canadians in the Homosexual Marriage legislation.

Instead their position to promote the "rights" of  a "Parent" in the widest sense of the word, making NO distinction  between NATURAL PARENTS and wannaabe Legal Parents.  They have bowed to University of Victoria's  assertion that  the SCC's Trociuk Decision "endorses a Heterosexual View of the Family and must be ignored", legitimizing the ongoing Child Trafficking by the State which views Canadian children as State Property and merchandise for  sale in the lucrative Child Adoption Market  They refuse to be hampered by prior obligations to that pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can Veto an Adoption.


It appears that many "Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United Nations and Liberal Irwin Cotler's assertion that the Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent has "NO RIGHTS", making the State, not the Natural Parents the Protector of the Child..

Without Cause or Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!

More:  About:  Beware of the IMPOSTER!!!!  "Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights";
News:  Lessard, Hester - Heterosexual view of Parenthood must be ignored
News:  Smith, Judge Daphne, BCSC, for Child Trafficking;
Issues:  Trociuk, Darrell;
Issues:  Child Trafficking, Canadian;
Testimonials:  Rick Fredrickson of Saskatoon

Bill Graham, Liberal <Pedophile> Leader & Defense Minister




Bill Graham, mp - Google Search;
Bill Graham, mp - Google Video

Lawrence Metherel - Google Search

2007-06-19  Liberal MP Bill Graham announces resignation

"In spite of credible revelations dating back to April 2002 about Bill Graham, a sex addicted bi-sexual sodomizing a 15 year old male prostitute named Lawrence Metherel, Paul Martin allowed Graham to remain Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister - and eventually named him to the portfolio of Minister of Defense.

"On Sept. 28/2005 a vote was held in Parliament to raise the age of consent from 14 (one of the lowest age of consents in the world) to 16 (an age which many still consider too low).

"Bill Graham, Paul Martin, and Anne McLellan, on Sept. 28th, voted against raising the age of consent to 16

More:  News:  Graham, Bill:  Pedophile Parliamentarian, Defense Minister

















Phyllis Schlafly and Stephen Baskerville

On February 14, 2006 Both Phyllis Schlafly and Stephen Baskerville join together in a landmark interview
"War Against The Family".mp3

Phyllis
Schlafly

"The Family Courts are <generally> a bunch of second rate hangers-on   ...  build each other's businesses through referrals...Family Law is a <parasitic> self-sustaining Industry"

Stephen
Baskerville

"Why isn't "Focus on the Family" working for Equal Parenting?

Stephen Baskerville's Home; American Coal. for Fathers and Children

Terminology

Habeas Corpus :  "literally, "you may have the body". A Habeas Corpus is a legal writ that protects an individual against arbitrary imprisonment by requiring that any person arrested be brought before a court for formal charge. If the charge is considered to be valid, the person must submit to trial; if not, the person goes free. When the law is suspended, then individuals can be imprisoned indefinitely and without charge."      ..... 

More, Glossary of terms

Skeletons in the Closet, 2001

Skeletons in the Closet

Skeletons in the Closet, a film drawn from the dramatized lives of families living with a protected Pedophile and the mental illness it may create when a loving, faithful, Victim keeps the Secret.  This is shockingly common.  The Secret is their Power - BREAK IT!  (You would be well advised to stay away from the Public Servant.)

Trial By Jury displaced by Activist Judges

Of course Judges and other "Friends of the Court" won't receive capital punishment for Capital Crimes like Treason.

Trial By Jury, Canada - Google Search

Violence and Murder of Men by  Women sanctioned by Courts

FYI, most of what you  hear about Family Violence is a huge fraud because World Health Organization obligates members to:

a)  NOT report results of studies which do not show "expected results", and

b) if "unexpected results do eventually get reported, they may only be reported with "expert" commentary to explain away the deviation from the expected result that "Men are violent" and "Women are their Victims".

The World Health has as a primary Sponsor, the Rockefeller Foundations,  a Fabian Socialist group which has as it's aim the conversion of the West to a Soviet style block which can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.  See Norman Dodd.

What Is Gendercide?

Wages Gleaned at Source

BC ALS victim Art Brown finds FMEP garnishing his disability pension of Child Support for adult Child not living with Mother

Threats of Court  Costs &  Assessments lead Natural Fathers to abandon Custody Rights under Duress

Opponents of Equal Parenting like to tell you that seventy something percent of Custody Cases don't go to Trial, and are awarded as Sole Custody to Mom BY CONSENT. 

What they don't tell you is that in ninety something percent of Custody Cases that do go to Trial Mom gets Sole Custody anyway, and Dad has to pay on top of his Lawyer fees, the Court Costs for having lost his Application.  Faced with these abysmal odds, Dads are commonly told to "Just give her what she wants so you can have a good relationship with her".  Under such Duress many Dads foolishly acquiesce  ....  for a time at least......

We prefer that Natural Parents NOT sign a Consent Order that is not completely Equal with respect to Gender, as the relationship of the divorced couple is greatly destabilized with each injury to the equality of parental powers .

Pedophile Activists: Sexual Enticement of Children

Teacher-Student sex rules being relaxed by BCSC

Sexual Abuse by a Public Officer

Pedophile Activists obviously don't go around telling you what they're up to.  Instead they  call themselves "Mentors", "Social Workers", "Feminists" or "Homosexual Rights Activists".  In Canada, Pedophile Activists  have been successful in getting greater access to children by reducing the Age of Consent to FOURTEEN, and in eliminating a parents "right to know" when the child reaches the age of TWELVE, replacing them with school counselors and Social Workers, and by, of course, eradicating fathers from their children's lives entirely from birth on request by the mother. 

With the recent changes to accommodate homosexual marriage, the right of natural parents to "parent" their natural children will soon be removed entirely.  Through these statutory changes, the term "LEGAL PARENT" is replacing the historic term "NATURAL PARENT" in Canadian statutes.  As a result Natural Parents can no longer automatically claim to be the Legal Parents of their own natural children at birth.  Instead, to accommodate the Homosexual Activists' plan to push Natural Parents aside when it comes to parenting children, the Courts alone now decide who will be the "parents' of all children born in Canada.

Pedophile Activists are often lawyers, school counselors, teachers, Social Workers, Sex Ed teachers, YWCA leaders, pastors, Judges, etc. etc.  They seek positions with access and power over Children & Families, and positions to create social and political change.  The publicly undisclosed prevalence of Pedophile & Homosexual Activists in our civil service has been attributed to their determined politicism in the many groups like ACT UP! , the secrecy of the alliances made in various "secret societies" and sex clubs, and to Sexual Nepotism in the workplace.

"Friendly Parent Rule" DA.16.10 , AKA "Maximum Contact" ignored, almost eliminated by Liberal Party of Canada


CHILDREN OF DIVORCE BENEFIT FROM BOTH PARENTS

CHILDREN OF DIVORCE BENEFIT FROM BOTH PARENTS... by DrCaleParentingCoach

More:  About:  Equal Parenting How To's:  Three Layer Cake;
Testimonials:  England, Jonathan Vs Lesbian Lover;
Issues:  Move-Aways:  Parental Abduction Laws not Enforced with Moms
About:  Grandparents in Equal Parenting;
About:  EPR = Equal Parenting Roundups;
About: EPT =  Equal Parenting Trek;
About:  EP Trek Generic Calendar:
Issues:  Kinship Families or Grandparents raising Children::
 Issues:  Division of Assets;
News:  de Jong, Michael:   Lawyer & MLS, Legalizing Child Trafficking;

"Friendly Parent Rule" DA.16.10 , AKA "Maximum Contact" ignored, almost eliminated by Liberal Party of Canada's Bill C22

Section 16(10) of the Divorce Act, the "Friendly Parent" Rule

2004-xx-xx FACT's Children Need Both Parents... Who are the Radicals?.pdf

Maximum contact, DA.16.10

(10) In making an order under this section, the court shall give effect to the principle that a child of the marriage should have as much contact with each spouse as is consistent with the best interests of the child and, for that purpose, shall take into consideration the willingness of the person for whom custody is sought to facilitate such contact.

We contend that Canadian Courts have already been obliged BY STATUTE to write an Equal Parenting Order upon Application for a Custody Order by either Natural Parent.  This flows from concurrent satisfaction of the constraints from  the Maximum Contact Principle, DA.16.10  AND the Charter Rights prohibiting discrimination on the basis of gender. 

How do you Maximize Contact with TWO Natural Parents while making no preference based on gender?   With Equal Parenting, of course!!

There is no money in Equal Parenting Orders, however, so the Law Society and the Divorce Industry in general is anxious to have Sole Custody orders put into place to keep the $$$$$ rolling in..  This approach has been so successful, Stats Can reports over 60% of BC Law Society members' collective Income are derived from billings in BC's Family Courts.

So Sole Custody Orders are the norm. 

Anticipating that a hostile SCP may try to alienate an NCP, Parliament by the same Divorce Act 16.10 has instructed the Courts to, in consideration of a Custody Order, to require the Parent receiving  Custodial Powers to use those Powers to maintain the "MAXIMUM CONTACT" of the child's relationship with the Non-Custodial Parent (NCP).  This is referred to as the "Friendly Parenting Rule"

By these same instructions,  note that the Courts are told that a Sole Custodial  Parent (SCP) using their Custodial Powers to SEPARATE the child from their other Parent SHALL LOSE THEIR CUSTODIAL POWERS to the "FRIENDLY PARENT" upon Application by the NCP.  The emphatic opinion of some courageous and honest lawyers, however is that the Courts have rarely if ever complied with the "Friendly Parent Rule", DA.16.10

We were pleasantly surprised to see this is also the view of  BC Judge Hugh Campbell Stansfield.... who said on Global's "Meet the Judge"  "the Law requires that if a Custodial Parent denies Access to a Non-custodial Parent,  the Custodial Parent SHALL LOOSE CUSTODY to the parent who will maintain the MAXIMUM CONTACT

This being true, Breach of Trust and breaking "the law" to expand their bottom line is the the common practice the the BC Law Society and BC Judges.

Please continue this Discussion here.

More:  Issues:  "Friendly Parent Rule" 16.10 , AKA "Maximum Contact" ignored, almost eliminated by Liberal Party of Canada;
Issues:  Custody Orders not Enforced when Moms are in Breach;
Parental Alienation & "PAS"

Carol Rhodes:  Whistleblower  exposes the crooked child support agencies

Carol Rhodes exposes the corrupt child support agencies

carol Rhodes - Google Video

"Carol Rhodes, former Friend of the Court Investigator ...  recently did an interview with host Richard Farr on the KRights.com Internet Radio station. Michigan Shared parenting activist Robert Pedersen of A Child’s Right was also interviewed. To listen, click here.

More.... Issues;  Rhodes, Carol:  Friend of the Court = Enemy of the Family;
Testimonials:  Street, Wilbur, RIP:  Judicial Manslaughter, August 14, 2004
Issues:  Schlafly, Phyllis:  Judicial Globalism, Supremacy of Parliament, Global Government;
Issues:  Baskerville, Stephen: "Taken into Custody
Issues:  Norton, Bob:  Family Court Watcher;
Issues:  Griffin, G. Edward;
Issues:  Dodd, Norman:  Congressional Investigator & former Banker

"Friendly Parent Rule" 16.10 , AKA "Maximum Contact" quoted on Global's "Ask the Judge" by Judge Hugh Stansfield

Judge Hugh Campbell Stansfield went bravely onto Global's "Ask the Judge" segment and faced a barrage of questions on Family Law.  In the process Judge Stansfield accurately answered some by saying rightly that "the Law requires that if a Custodial Parent denies Access to a Non-custodial Parent,  the Custodial Parent SHALL LOOSE CUSTODY to the parent who will maintain the MAXIMUM CONTACT .... the Non-Custodial Parent" ("Friendly Parent Rule", 16.10,).  The import t was that this actually is the practice of the Courts, which to our eye is COMPLETELY FALSE. 

Bitter experience shows us that the practice of Justice Centers and BC Courtrooms follow another doctrine expressed as "Joint Custody requires the two parents get along so well that they probably would never Divorce.  If we see Conflict between parents we see this as a demand for Sole Custody to be established..... and that of couse will be to the Mother under our Tender Years doctrine."  

"Hugh Campbell Stansfield was appointed Chief Judge of the Provincial Court of British Columbia on July 1, 2005."

More:  Issues:  "Friendly Parent Rule" 16.10 , AKA "Maximum Contact" ignored, almost eliminated by Liberal Party of Canada;
Issues:  Move-Aways:  Parental Abduction Laws not Enforced with Moms
Issues:  Custody Orders not Enforced when Moms are in Breach;
Issues:  Schafer, Nancy:  Child Trafficking at CPS
 

Equal Parenting is like a "Three Layer Cake"

It seems to help thinking of an Equal Parenting Agreement like a "Three Layer Cake".  Each successive Layer rests upon and satisfies an Obligation of the former 

1.  The Bottom Layer:  The Initial Equal Parenting Agreement

Initial Equal Parenting Agreement creating full time, all time equality of both Natural Parents, subordinate to no third parties (a Constitutional right ignored by most Family Courts); a series of tentative Parenting Timetables for each year and statement of intent, or  "Wishes"; the requirement that the tentative Parenting Timetable laid out there will be reviewed and finalized annually and incorporated into the Annual Parenting Supplement.  Parental authority and discretion is always equal and unaffected by inequalities of Parenting Time allocations.

The Initial Agreement establishes a collection of Covenants which span all years to the children's Age of Majority.  Some Covenants will span the entire term of the Agreement, while some Covenants can only be made In Principle and will be deferred to an Annual Parenting Supplement

At-A-Glance® Erasable Yearly Vertical Jumbo Wall Calendar, 48" x 32", 20052.  Middle Layer:  The Annual Supplement & its Parenting Timetable

The "Middle Layer", the series of "Annual Parenting Supplements" finalizes a specified subset of Covenants which could in the Initial Agreement be made only In Principal, (or as "Wishes" in the language of a Trust).  Typically these are the Guardianship topics.

Each Annual Supplement and it's embedded Parenting Time Timetable is necessary to perform the Obligations or Trusts of the Initial Agreement.   

The Annual Parenting Supplements are for near term planning of the upcoming school year and finalizing the Parenting Timetable for the coming  year.  The Parenting Timetable created must meet the test for equality established in 1) the initial Equal Parenting Agreement. 

In an Equal Parenting Agreement, Parenting Time is NOT an indicator of Parental Authority.  Two Equal Parents may by consent agree to unequal Parenting Time, but this does NOT impugn the Parental Authority of either Natural Parent relative to third parties without Cause or Consent.

Each Annual Supplement is made about the same time each year and deals only with parenting decisions for the upcoming year which were deferred in the Initial Agreement, and made only In Principle. 

An Annual Parenting Supplement for each year fulfills an Obligation created in the Initial Agreement, and one will be made annually  until the Agreement's term is completed at the Age of Majority of the youngest Child.  Failure to create an Annual Supplement means the requirements of the Initial Agreement made In Principle will be by silence be given approval.

3.  Top Layer:  Autonomy of Both Equal Parents on all matters not previously Constrained

The Parenting Timetable alternates physical custody and all residual parenting questions not previously constrained by agreement in  the Initial Agreement or the current Annual Parenting Supplements  between the two otherwise equal Natural Parents. 

Both Natural Parents retain full Parental Authority relative to all third parties, and are subject to no third party Interloper or to a Public Officer without statutory Cause or Consent.  This way the Natural Parent who is not the Timetabled Parent (and is now a subordinate Co-Parent) remains at all times empowered to protect the Child from the State and all other threats.

4.  Icing on the Cake.....

Forget about the Courts, and your Ex, and go have fun with your kids!!!

More:  About:  Equal Parenting How To's:  Three Layer Cake;
About:  Grandparents in Equal Parenting;
About:  EPR = Equal Parenting Roundups;
About: EPT =  Equal Parenting Trek;
About:  EP Trek Generic Calendar:
Issues:  Kinship Families or Grandparents raising Children::

Happiness Break: Reunion!

christian the lion, reunion - Google Search

If you never sign a Master Joyce Guardianship Model (or any other non-equal Parenting Agreement), your kids' Custodial Parent, Step-Parent, Teacher, Social Worker, or Pastor can never point to your Signature and tell them that you didn't want them or that you gave them up BY CONSENT.  Always MAKE THE JUDGE SIGN the disgusting Sole Custody Order and reap the consequences later. 

Meanwhile, we hope estranged Dads can look forward to a Happy Reunion with your children in not too many years.

The lion reunion christian full

More:  Issues:  Custody Orders not Enforced;
Issues:  Parental Alienation Syndrome / Stockholm Syndrome
Issues:  Sole Custody is Child Abuse

Bruce Haines,  QC on Judiciary's refusal to obey "Friendly Parent" statute 16.10

1997-10-28 Child Custody and Access Reform, Special Joint Committee Established Section 16(10) of the Divorce Act, the "Friendly Parent" Rule was going to be removed by the last Liberal Government to conform Canadian Statute to Judicial Practice rather than prosecute the Activist Judges for Breach of Trust by a Public Officer.  The Death Penalty for Treason of course had been long removed.

Toronto lawyer, son of the late Mr. Justice Edson Haines. On February 3, 1997, he wrote:

"Dear Senators:   For over thirty years I have practiced family law in Ontario and during that time have watched the development of the law and the dramatically changed social conditions which have not only seen a very high percentage of married women move into the work force in most every area but have also seen a significant narrowing of the income differentials between men and women. During that same period I have watched spousal social expectations change in that husbands have embraced a full participation in all aspects of family functions, particularly in the nurturing and raising of their children.

Changes to the divorce law have rarely kept pace with changing attitudes and, despite the gender neutral language of the Divorce Act, its actual implementation in the areas of child custody and child support has continued to be marked by an entrenched systemic gender bias that `mother knows best and father pays best.' The administration of justice does not treat spouses equally when it comes to assigning child custody. By and large, custody is almost always assigned to mothers and the most fathers can hope for is a generous access order. Where fathers interfere with custody orders they will ordinarily bear the full weight of the law while mothers who flaunt access orders will, by and large, receive judicial admonitions with usually little other consequence.

Section 16(10) of the Divorce Act requires courts to take into consideration the willingness of the person for whom custody is sought to facilitate contact of the child with each spouse. Practicing family law lawyers know that this Section is almost never invoked.
"

See also Courts have turned the Law upside down contrary to the will of Parliament, Solicitor Adrian Pellman;
Issues:  "Friendly Parent Rule" 16.10 , AKA "Maximum Contact" ignored, almost eliminated by Liberal Party of Canada;
Issues:  Custody Orders not Enforced when Moms are in Breach;
Parental Alienation & "PAS"

Poofy Judges, Monty Python

poofy judges, monty python - Google Video

"All FMEP Members are lawyers.  Their job is to enforce Orders, so also participate in sale of properties, bankruptcies & foreclosures,"

"Homosexual  fraction of the Law Societies & Judiciaries is "forty-something" percent"

2001-08-06  NICHOLSON:  "High Crimes in British Columbia"   Protected Pedophile Rings in BC.mp3

2003-08-xx social-worker-grabbed-my-penis-threatened.mp3;

2008-09-16 PRIOR: Why wont anyone hear me Mission Unstoppable.mp3

Lawyers consistently estimate the homosexual  fraction of the Law Societies & Judiciaries as "forty-something" percent.  That is, a randomly selected Judge or Lawyer is about thirty times more likely to be homosexual than the population at large.  (BTW, a randomly selected Homosexual is about forty times more likely to be a Pedophile than a randomly selected Canadian.).

The Judiciary now claims the right to INTERPRET whatever meaning they want into the written Statutes of Parliament, and refuse to be bound by any literal, contextual reading of a Statute of Parliament.  By these nefarious means Activist Judges have "interpreted" the Charter to give themselves Homosexual Marriage and with it eliminated Natural Parents' rights, obliging - they claim - our Parliament & Legislatures to replace the term NATURAL PARENT with the term LEGAL PARENT.  

Without the knowledge or consent of the Canadian people, these Activist Judges have robbed you of the right to be the Legal Parent of your own Natural Children.,  

We are noticing too that they are lying to us about what COMMON LAW is.  Ask a few lawyers what Common Law is, and we guess they will tell you the Lie that it is whatever is commonly being Ordered by the Judges at any point in time, and is therefore very dynamic and cannot be defined.  We can happily tell you this is completely FALSE, and is instead an admission of their malicious intent.

AXE ACTIVIST JUDGES!!!

Poofy Judges - Google Video Poofy Judges 2, Monty Python

More:  Issues:  Poofy Judges
Issues:  Lively, Scott:  "Pink Swastika", Homosexuality and the Nazi Party;
Issues:  Lynette Burrows, Psychologist warns on Pedophiles
Issues:  Homosexual Activism;
Issues:  Judicial Activism;

Liberal Anne McLellan says "Joint Custody Perpetuates the domination of men over women"

We'll have to check if Liberal Anne McLellan was one of the many Liberal Affirmative Action Dipsticks, but it would appear so based on the following.  In "Women and the Process of Constitutional Reform" McLellan warns that <Horrors!> "Provincial Legislatures may impose a presumption of Joint Custody... and perpetuate the domination of men over women"  

The Liberal Party and Child Sexual Abuse

In 1991, Anne McLellan's, then professor of law at the University of Alberta, wrote a discussion paper for the Alberta Advisory Council on Women's Issues entitled, "Women and the Process of Constitutional Reform" In this paper, she argued that constitutional devolution of federal government powers to the provinces would give provincial governments control over the family, such that certain proceedings in separation and divorce would fall under provincial jurisdiction by virtue of the province's power over property and civil rights. Such devolution she believes would result in joint custody after divorce - a calamity." Justice minister Anne McLellan wrote: "If, through constitutional reform, divorce became a matter of exclusive provincial jurisdiction, provinces could then legislate comprehensively in the area of "the family." Some provincial legislatures may choose to impose a presumption of joint custody and require mandatory mediation in the resolution of family disputes."..."an increasing number of commentators now suggest that joint custody may simply perpetuate the influence and domination of men over the lives of women."    

In light of Anne McLellan's views about fathers and divorce in her paper "Women and the Process of Constitutional Reform"  I do not see how Canadians can trust Anne McLellan Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada to make changes to the Divorce Act as needed and implement recommendations of the Special Joint Committee of the Senate and the House of Commons "For The Sake of the children". In fact she will keep alive the popular misconception that "mother knows best and father pays best".

More:  News:  McLellan , Liberal Anne "Joint Custody Perpetuates the domination of men over women"

FACT's Children Need Both Parents... Who are the Radicals?

 

The so-called "Friendly Parent Rule" , by which Parliament has directed the Courts to facilitate the maximum contact of the children with their Parents when they allocate custodial powers to any Parent.  This coupled with the Charter of Rights prohibiting discrimination by the Government and it's Courts on the basis of sex (Sec 15.1 & Sec. 28) the statutory obligation on the Courts is (in the absence of evidence that the Maximum Contact principle is not in the best interest of the children) to create an Equal Parenting Plan for every child after every Divorce. 

Section 16(10) of Divorce Act (RS1985). reads:

Maximum contact

(10) In making an order under this section, the court shall give effect to the principle that a child of the marriage should have as much contact with each spouse as is consistent with the best interests of the child and, for that purpose, shall take into consideration the willingness of the person for whom custody is sought to facilitate such contact.

The Courts have thereby been instructed by Parliament that on review of a Parenting Plan, a Sole Custodial Parent who uses their custodial powers to restrict contact of the children with the other Parent are to LOOSE their custodial powers to the parent that WILL facilitate the contact of the children with both parents.    Family Law Courts in particular, of course, ignore Statues at will.

Statistics Canada has produced Selected Statistics on Canadian Families and Family Law, dated 2000 which demonstrates on page 17 that eighteen years after the passage of the Constitution Act and Charter of Rights that the Courts AT BEST give  a father 1 in10 chance of getting custody of his children. A popular Feminist deception is to make hay of the reluctance of Fathers to "fight for their children" in Canadian Courts.  The stunning news however is NOT that fathers "abandon" their children in Divorce Court.  The news IS that a father WILL fight for his children in spite of the fact that his prospect of being successful is less than 10%!

More:  "Friendly Parent Rule" 16.10 , AKA "Maximum Contact" ignored, almost eliminated by Liberal Party of Canada
   
 Custody Orders not Enforced when Moms are in Breach;
Parental Alienation & "PAS"

"Friendly Parent Rule" DA.16.10 , AKA "Maximum Contact" ignored

"Maximum Contact" ignored... almost eliminated by Liberal Party of Canada's Bill C22

Section 16(10) of the Divorce Act, the "Friendly Parent" Rule

2004-xx-xx FACT's Children Need Both Parents... Who are the Radicals?.pdf

"..over 60% of BC Law Society members' Billable Hours are derived from BC's Family Courts."

We contend that Canadian Courts have already been obliged BY STATUTE to write an Equal Parenting Order upon Application for a Custody Order by either Natural Parent.  This flows from concurrent satisfaction of the constraints from  the Maximum Contact Principle, DA.16.10  AND the Charter Rights prohibiting discrimination on the basis of gender. 

How do you Maximize Contact with TWO Natural Parents while making no preference based on gender?   With Equal Parenting, of course!!

 "..the Law requires that if a Custodial Parent denies Access to a Non-custodial Parent,  the Custodial Parent SHALL LOOSE CUSTODY to the parent who WILL maintain the MAXIMUM CONTACT"


More:  Issues:  "Friendly Parent Rule" 16.10 , AKA "Maximum Contact" ignored, almost eliminated by Liberal Party of Canada;
Issues:  Custody Orders not Enforced when Moms are in Breach;
Parental Alienation & "PAS"

Senator Nancy Schaefer, RIP 2010

Vs Child Trafficking by CPS, Abortion, Gay Marriage, North American Union, murdered 2010

"....  she was wrapping up a self-funded documentary that "named names" and exposed a very high-level, child-pedophile ring.  That's enough to get anyone killed."

Nancy Schaefer - Google Search;
Nancy Schaefer - Google Video 

Senator Nancy Schaefer, Autopsy - Google Search

Former Senator Nancy Schaefer and her husband Bruce have died from a single shot wound each. Nancy was shot once in the back while she lay sleeping.  Her husband Bruce was shot once in the chest.    Both shots were lethal.  Two shots, Two Kills  The deaths are being handled as a 'murder-suicide'. More likely Bruce was shot in the chest while confronting the Shooter having been woken by the the shot that killed Nancy.



2010-03-27  Former Senator Nancy Schaefer Shot To Death With Husband;

2010-03-27 Nancy Schaefer and her husband found dead

2010-03-27  Former GA State Senator Nancy Schaefer, Husband Bruce, Found Shot to Death in Possible Murder-Suicide

2009-08-xx  Nancy Schaefer "The Unlimited Power of Child Protective Services" Part 1 of 2 (Part 2 of 2)

CPS crimes against children

More:  Issues:  Schafer, Nancy:  Child Trafficking at CPS;
Issues:  "Franklin Scandal", "Conspiracy of Silence" - Organized Child Abduction / Sexual Abuse / Extortion of Legislators
Issues: Child Trafficking by Public Officers & Judges
Issues:  Boys of Saint Vincent <Mount Cashel>, Newfoundland;
Testimonials:  Prior, Byron: Sexual Abuse;
Testimonials:  Earle, Shane: Mount Cashel;;
Testimonials: Samson, Pierre:  Duplessis Orphans, QU
News:  Mount Cashel Orphanage, St. John's NL;
News:  Duplessis Orphans:  Nazi Experiments
Orphange, NL

Bruce Haines, QC:  Canadian Justice Review Board

Bruce Haines, QC - Google Search;

 

Canadian Justice Review Board - Google Search

More:  Issues:  Haines, Bruce QC:  Canadian Justice Review Board:
News: Berverly McLachlin's Treasonous Judiciary
Issues:  Friendly Parent Rule;
Issues:  Judicial Activism;
Issues:  Judicial Globalization:
Issues:  Adrian Pellman:  Courts have turned the Law:

Liberal Anne McLellan says "Joint Custody Perpetuates the domination of men over women"


Former Liberal Justice Minister, Deputy Prime Minister

Anne McLellan , MP - Google Search

In "Women and the Process of Constitutional Reform" McLellan warns that <Horrors!> "Provincial Legislatures may impose a presumption of Joint Custody... and perpetuate the domination of men over women"  

The Liberal Party and Child Sexual Abuse


More:  News:  McLellan , Liberal Anne "Joint Custody Perpetuates the domination of men over women"

Homosexual Marriage: Stripping Natural Parents of Common Law Parental Rights


Canadian Children now born parentless State Property for Trafficking by State Officials

book_2003-SOMERVILLE-case-against-same-sex-marriage.pdf

2004-12-04  Supreme Court OK's same-sex marriage;

SCC finds the term "Natural Parent" repugnant to homosexuals, demand it's removal from Canadian Statutes, leaving Canadian Children parentless State Property from birth.  2004-12-04  Liberals to introduce same-sex marriage bill in January;  (Liberals allow Activists rather than Parliament to create Legislation, abandoning Supremacy of Parliament.)


CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS IN CANADA!

2001-08-06  NICHOLSON:  "High Crimes in British Columbia"   Protected Pedophile Rings in BC.mp3

2003-08-xx social-worker-grabbed-my-penis-threatened.mp3;

2008-09-16 PRIOR: Why wont anyone hear me Mission Unstoppable.mp3;


More:  Issues:  Homosexual Marriage: Stripping Natural Parents of Parental Rights;
News:  Beverly McLachlin:  Canada's Treasonous Chief Judge;
Issues:  Cromwell, Oliver: Parliamentary Supremacy;
Issues: Supremacy of Parliament;
Issues:  "Judicial Interpretation" to pervert Statutes of Parliament;
Issues: Judicial Globalization is Treason

"Best interests of the Child" a blank cheque for Judicial Tyranny

 

"the Best Interests the Child" is the loophole Judges use to make arbitrary judgments .. rather than follow the direct instruction of Parliamentary Statute.  The Friendly Parent Rule, for example

More:  Issues:  "Best interests of the Child" a blank cheque for Judicial Tyranny

Move-Aways Sanctioned by Courts Vs 16.10

Parental Abduction Laws not Enforced with Moms

A "Move Away" is when the Sole Custodial Parent (SCP) moves the Children away to another town or Province making it all but impossible for the Non-Custodial Parent (NCP) to sustain a relationship with their children.  Typically this is coupled with a False Accusation of Abuse to get Free Housing, free Legal Aide, Ex Parte Orders and so on. 

We are asking all EPA groups and other Natural Parent's Rights groups to develop reciprocal relationships of free peer support on the ground in the Province or State to which the Natural Child has been abducted.

 More:  Issues:  Move-Aways:  Parental Abduction Laws not Enforced with Moms;
Testimonials:  Andrade, Franklin of Montreal;
Testimonials:  Gonis, Frank & Ashley of Montreal;
EP Trek:  Franco Andrade's struggle to regain children after FAs & Move Away to Winnipeg

Jandre Botha, RIP March 2006 : "You're not my Daddy"

4 yo Boy beaten to death for not calling Mom's Lesbian Lover "Daddy"

Jandre Botha - Google Search;
Jandre Botha - Google Video

The father of a four-year-old boy, who was beaten so badly for refusing to call his mother's lesbian lover "Daddy" that he died of his injuries, says the courts and social workers are to blame for the death of his son.

engeline de nysschen - Google Search;
engeline de nysschen - Google Video

"You can pretty much tell at the scene when it is a Homosexual Murder.... by the violence of it... mutilation of the body..... sexual mutilation..."

2006-03-26  <Four-year-old Jandre Botha> Slain because he refused to call his mother's lesbian lover 'Daddy'

2006-03-26  Boy (4) died at hands of lesbian pair, Horrific injuries showed long-term abuse

More: Testimonials:  Botha, Jandre, RIP 2006 : "You're not my Daddy";
News:  de Nysschen, Engeline:  Lesbians murder boy

Jonathan England:  Canadian looses three girls & wife to British Lesbian lover, March 2005

Three Canadian Children deported to join Mother's Lesbian Lover in Britain

Jonathan England, three girls - Google Search

2005-03-31  Canadian Children Unwillingly Forced to Return to Britain to Lesbian Mother and Partner

2005-03-31  Father distraught after losing daughters

2005-03-31   'I want my daddy', Three <Niagara> girls at the hub of a legal dispute are handed to their mother <and her new lesbian lover, rules Justice Lucy Glenn>

More:  Testimonials:  England, Jonathan Vs Lesbian Lover;
Issues:  Poofy Judges;
Issues:  National Sovereignty;
Issues:  Homosexual Marriage:
Issues: Homosexual Activism;
Issues:  Judicial Gglobalization;
Issues:  Pedophiles Fear Dads
Issues:  Natural Parents; Rights;

Frank & Ashley Gonis of Montreal

BC Judge backs Quebec Mom's Move-Away to BC

frank, ashley gonis - Google Search;
frank, ashley gonis - Google Video

BC Judges block Quebec dad from seeing daughter, May 15 2009

2009-04-15 Frank Gonis "ecstatic" his daughter is okay

 More:  Issues:  Move Aways;
Testimonials:  Andrade, Franklin of Montreal;
Testimonials:  Gonis, Frank & Ashley of Montreal;
EP Trek:  Franco Andrade's struggle to regain children after FAs & Move Away to Winnipeg

Adoption Veto for Dads & Natural Grandparents of Minor Children, Child Trafficking

"Without Cause or Consent, no child shall be removed from a Natural Parent."

"Homosexuals are about 40 TIMES more likely to be pedophiles than heterosexuals."

Homosexual Marriage in Canada has created an overwhelming demand by homosexual pairs for children to adopt, accelerating the Child Trafficking in Canadian Courts. 

Svend Robinson - Jewl ThiefNatural Parents, the Courts claim, have no right to deny Legal Parentage from homosexuals and are threatened with Hate Crime prosecution by homosexual applicants.



More:  Adoption Veto for Dads & Natrual Grandparents of Minor Children;
Issues:  Trociuk, Darrell;
Issues:  Child Trafficking, Canadian;
Testimonials:  Rick Fredrickson of Saskatoon

Franklin Andrade Machiavello of Montreal, QU

False Accusations & Move-Away to Winnipeg from Montreal

Collected from Franklin Andrade: Falsely accused father and the abductions of my children to Winnipeg from Montreal

More:  Issues:  Move Aways;
Testimonials:  Andrade, Franklin of Montreal;
Testimonials:  Gonis, Frank & Ashley of Montreal;
EP Trek:  Franco Andrade's struggle to regain children after FAs & Move Away to Winnipeg


     
Copyright 2002  equalparenting-bc.ca 

 

        Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages  exercising democratic rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.