The Canadian Parliament might also
consider eliminating the threat to the matrimonial bond
inherent in "No Fault" Divorce. Permitting one
marriage partner to unilaterally end a joint relationship
with impunity is very destabilizing to Canadian families,
and creates too much business in Family Law . We think
Canadians still get married for more reasons than just
establishing a temporary monogamy within which to
share spousal benefits and to establish paternity claims.
We think Canadians still think of marriage as a
relationship of Trust and security, in the tradition of the
oft spoken vow of "For Better or Worse".
With "No Fault
Divorce", there is no remedy when the Trust
placed in a "Spouse" is breached. There is
therefore no deterrent for matrimonial predators who by
becoming a "spouse" have free license 24/7 to take children,
inheritance and family assets, and hold these hostage from
the distraught father. There is no fund
established with the "saved" litigation costs to insure the
victim of Divorce as there is in other "no-fault"
schemes. Since ~1972 Canadian legislation
has been gutted of such dearly held values by "No Fault
Divorce" and has been devolved into a division of assets
and other financial obligations. Only the
lawyers gain by putting so much more within their grasp.
We think there is substantial merit in:
Reestablishing the "Fault" in
Divorce legislation. If couples prefer to live
under a cohabitation agreement there is nothing to
prevent them. But if a couple wishes to live as a
"married" couple, why should legislation preclude them
from living as "married" in the historic sense?
Reestablishing the Enticement laws,
providing the injured spouse with claims against third
parties who entice their spouse to end their marriage.
This one change will make the ubiquitous father-hatred
groups unprofitable to run, and leave families to
succeed or fail of their own accord. It also gives
children a chance at recouping their inheritance from
these professional Misandrists
Reestablishing the Seduction laws,
providing the injured spouse with claims against third
parties who seduce their spouse into adulterous
relationships.
We apologize that the
following figures have not been developed for the Province of BC
specifically. We hope to do this over time. We do know,
however that women often move to BC from Alberta and the rest of Canada
to have their divorces done here in BC where the
misandry of the Family Courts will
maximize their powers to destroy their husbands.
Children from fatherless homes account
for:
63% of youth suicides. (Source: US Dept.
of Health & Human Services, Bureau of the Census).
71% of pregnant teenagers. (Source: US
Dept. of Health & Human Services)
90% of all homeless and runaway
children.
70% of juveniles in state-operated
institutions come from fatherless homes (Source: U.S. Dept. of
Justice, Special Report, Sept 1988)
85% of all children that exhibit
behavioral disorders. (Source: Center for Disease Control).
80% of rapists motivated with displaced
anger. (Source: Criminal Justice & Behavior, Vol. 14, p. 403-26,
1978).
71% of all high school dropouts.
(Source: National Principals Association Report on the State of High
Schools).
75% of all adolescent patients in
chemical abuse centers. (Source: Rainbows for all God's Children).
85% of all youths sitting in prisons.
(Source: Fulton Co. Georgia jail populations, Texas Dept. of
Corrections 1992).
Children from fatherless
homes are:
11 times more likely to exhibit violent
behavior than children from intact "married" homes.
5 times more likely to commit suicide.
32 times more likely to runaway.
20 times more likely to have behavioral
disorders.
14 times more likely to commit rape.
9 times more likely to drop out of high
school.
10 times more likely to abuse chemical
substances.
9 times more likely to end up in
state-operated institutions.
20 times more likely to end up in
prison.
"37.9% of
fathers have no access/visitation rights."
(Source: p.6, col.II, para. 6, lines 4 & 5, Census Bureau
P-60, #173, Sept 1991.)
"40% of mothers reported that they had interfered with the
non-custodial father's visitation on at least one occasion, to punish
the ex-spouse." (Source: p. 449, col. II, lines 3-6, (citing
Fulton) Frequency of visitation by Divorced Fathers; Differences in
Reports by Fathers and Mothers. Sanford Braver et al, Am. J. of
Orthopsychiatry, 1991.)
"Overall,
approximately 50% of mothers "see no value in the father's continued
contact with his children...."
(Source: Surviving the Breakup, Joan Kelly & Judith
Wallerstein, p. 125) Only 11% of mothers value their husband's input
when it comes to handling problems with their kids. Teachers & doctors
rated 45%, and close friends & relatives rated %16.(Source: EDK
Associates survey of 500 women for Redbook Magazine. Redbook, November
1994, p. 36)
"The former
spouse (mother) was the greatest obstacle to having more frequent
contact with the children." (Source:
Increasing our understanding of fathers who have infrequent contact with
their children, James Dudley, Family Relations, Vol. 4, p. 281, July
1991.)
"A clear
majority (70%) of fathers felt that they had too little time with their
children." (Source: Visitation and the
Noncustodial Father, Mary Ann Kock & Carol Lowery, Journal of Divorce,
Vol. 8, No. 2, p. 54, Winter 1984.)
"Very few of
the children were satisfied with the amount of contact with their
fathers, after divorce." (Source:
Visitation and the Noncustodial Father, Koch & Lowery, Journal of
Divorce and Remarriage, Vol. 8, No. 2, p. 50, Winter 1984.)
"Feelings of anger towards their former spouses hindered effective
involvement on the part of fathers; angry mothers would sometimes
sabotage father's efforts to visit their children." (Source:
Ahrons and Miller, Am. Journal of Orthopsychiatry, Vol. 63. p. 442, July
1993.)
"Mothers may
prevent visits to retaliate against fathers for problems in their
marital or post-marital relationship."
(Source: Seltzer, Shaeffer & Charing, Journal of Marriage & the Family,
Vol. 51, p. 1015, November 1989.)
In a study: "Visitational
Interference - A National Study" by Ms. J Annette Vanini, M.S.W. and
Edward Nichols, M.S.W., it was found that 77% of non-custodial fathers
are NOT able to "visit" their children, as ordered by the court, as a
result of "visitation interference" perpetuated by the custodial parent.
In other words, non-compliance with court ordered visitation is three
times the problem of non-compliance with court ordered child support and
impacts the children of divorce even more. Originally published Sept.
1992
Child Support
Information from multiple
sources show that only 10% of all non-custodial fathers fit the
"deadbeat dad" category: 90% of the fathers with joint custody paid the
support due. Fathers with visitation rights pay 79.1%; and 44.5% of
those with NO visitation rights still financially support their
children. (Source: Census Bureau report. Series P-23, No. 173).
Additionally, of those not paying support, 66% are not doing so because
they lack the financial resources to pay (Source: GAO report:
GAO/HRD-92-39 FS).
The following is sourced from: Technical Analysis Paper No. 42, U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Income Security
Policy, Authors: Meyer and Garansky.
Custodial mothers who receive a support
award: 79.6%
Custodial fathers who receive a support
award: 29.9%
Non-custodial mothers who totally
default on support: 46.9%
Non-custodial fathers who totally
default on support: 26.9%
Judges and their elite
Star
Chamber entrench their power and status to rule over Canadians with
impunity and unbridled
narcissism.
Feminist and Homosexual Activists as Judges effect
their political agenda without the consent of the Canadian demographic.
They with full knowledge and intent (scripted in the sixties & seventies
by their Activist writers) circumvent due democratic process and
knowingly contravene the founding legal constructs of Canada in the BNA
& in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Activist Judges happily
and routinely breach the Trust placed in them by their employer, the
Canadian Taxpayer.
Lawyers routinely Entice into self-destruction and
financial rape vast numbers of families entering their doors.
Because of the Statutory self-regulation of the BC Law Society, we know
of no limiting factor to cap the Activism of the Judiciary other than
prosecuting Judges and Lawyers who exceed the powers granted them by
Statute.
The BC Law Society pimps BC women, and use them as
their hookers. With others (also conspicuously funded by the
Taxpayer), Law Society members instruct women to hook fathers and
families into the Courts and the financial ruin a "Legal Marriage"
entails. Children NEED this threat to their security to be
EXTERMINATED.
Faced with the entrenched Father Hatred and
Affirmative Action of the burgeoning civil service, boys and young men
despair. Having no vision for a Future or a university education,
they become prone to fulfill the Father Hatred prophecies of BC
university's Women's Studies faculties and Feminist Activists.
"Children of single parents were at
higher risk of physical abuse and of all types of neglect and were
overrepresented among seriously injured, moderately injured, and
endangered children. Compared with their counterparts living with both
parents, children in single parent families had:
a 77% greater risk of being
harmed by physical abuse (using the stringent Harm Standard) and a
63% greater risk of experiencing any countable physical abuse (using
the Endangerment Standard);
an 87% greater risk of being
harmed by physical neglect and a 165% greater risk of experiencing
any countable physical neglect;
a 74% greater risk of being
harmed by emotional neglect and a 64% greater risk of experiencing
any countable emotional neglect;
a 220% (or more than three
times) greater risk of being educationally neglected;
an approximately 80% greater
risk of suffering serious injury or harm from abuse or neglect;
an approximately 90% greater
risk of receiving moderate injury or harm as a result of child
maltreatment; and
a 120% (or more than two times)
greater risk of being endangered by some type of child abuse or
neglect."
2006-11-10
Top judges rebuke Tories Federal plan would allow police to help
appoint judiciary - workopolis.com; "Beverley
McLachlin, Canada's Chief Justice, along with a powerful council of
the country's top judges issued an unprecedented rebuke yesterday to
Justice Minister Vic Toews for hatching a plan to arbitrarily change
the way judges are chosen. The Canadian Judicial Council
expressed dismay that Mr. Toews is planning to introduce "significant
changes to the composition and functioning of the Judicial Advisory
Committees," secret groups which are set up in each region to vet
candidates for the 1,100 federal judgeships across the country.
Chief Justice McLachlin, who chairs the council, urged Mr. Toews to
include the judiciary and key legal bodies in any discussion of
changes to the committee vetting process."
We
need in the very least some kind of JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY ACT
which will look something like::
Divide the Law Society into two groups of
Judges and Practicing Lawyers to protect the Lawyers who would
make Cases against Judges. There would be some Law Society
Members who may practice as Barristers, and some as Solicitors,
but a Judge must RETIRE from the Practice of Law and
become unable to affect the Law Society while they act as a
Judge. On removal of a Judge for
Judicial Activism,
the Law Society may deny their return to Practice from
Retirement for specified cause, such as the case made during
an unsuccessful Criminal Charge of
Breach of Trust or Treason.
The Judges naturally divide into two bodies,
the Provincial and Federal Judicial Societies to parallel the
Provincial and Federal Courts. Membership in both Judicial
Societies must be precluded. Federal Judges would be tried
by Provincial Judges according to the
JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY ACT, and the Provincial Judges would
be tried by the Federal Judges. They could be tried both
in Tort and in Criminal Court for
Breach of Trust and for
Treason.
Make Judicial Appointments for a FIXED TERM
of no more than five years (Jimmy Pattison where are you when we
need you?)
Judicial Re-Appointment must meet a Test for
Judicial Re-Appointment which demonstrates the prescribed
Impartiality (that is an Activism Free record.) and Non-Infamy
with the Electorate.
Automatic Temporary Suspension Without Pay
for a Judge who is going to Trial in Tort or in Criminal
Court, pending its outcome.
Eradication
of
Freemasonry from the Judiciary and Law Societies. Both
are granted special privileges by Parliamentary Statute which
they receive In Trust.. Judicial Candidates and sitting
Judges must be vetted for Occult
practices resulting in Public Safety concerns such as
Pedophilia.
Pedophilia is an established part of Occult worship
(See
Malachi Martin among others) and is reported to be a
tolerated practice of some high ranking Judges.
Trial by Jury of Judges before non-allied and
non-associated Judges, e.g.. Federal
Judges
tried before Provincial Judges, visa versa..
NO SPECIAL
PROSECUTORS for Judges or other Public Servants being
tried.
Under the "federal" division of powers in the BNA
(Constitution Act, 1867)) Education falls into the Provincial
domain. A parallel Provincial Statute to amend the licensing
and Suspension of Teachers
would be necessary to stop the present use of our Schools for
Political Indoctrination by Activists. See also
Four Missions
Natural
Grandparents Rights Proposals; Social Works
& Foster Parents get funding for raising other people's
children, Grandparents don't because they're a "Kinship Family".
See Saskatoon G I F T (Grandparents Involved Full Time)
Dorothy Bird: (306) 382-3650
We
say that's WRONG, and Grans should not be jeopardizing their
financial stability to raise an unexpected New Arrival.
2008-01-09_Documentary to focus on kinship families
"Tammy Brockhaus, with her grandson, Alex, is one of thousands
raising a grandchild in Canada. W-5 is airing a documentary on the
issue of grandparents raising grandchildren on Feb. 9 .. Brockhaus
is a 58-year-old widow who has been raising her six-year-old
grandson, Alex, since he was 30 days old. While the last six years
have proved to be a challenge for her, Brockhaus,
who also has three grown children, has found fulfillment raising a
child the second time around."
Removal of judges from office, Oklahoma
Constitution
(a) In addition to other
methods and causes prescribed by the Constitution and laws,
the judges of any court, exercising judicial power under the
provisions of Article VII, or under any other provision, of
the Constitution of Oklahoma, shall be subject to removal
from office, or to compulsory retirement from office, for
causes herein specified, by proceedings in the Court on the
Judiciary.
(b) Cause for removal from
office shall be: Gross neglect of duty; corruption in
office; habitual drunkenness; commission while in office of
any offense involving moral turpitude;
gross partiality in office;
oppression in office; or other grounds as may be
specified hereafter by the legislature.
(c) Cause for compulsory
retirement from office, with or without compensation, shall
be mental or physical disability preventing the proper
performance of official duty, or incompetence to perform the
duties of the office"
"The Family Courts
are <generally> a bunch of second rate hangers-on
... build each other's businesses through
referrals...Family Law is a <parasitic> self-sustaining
Industry"
Habeas
Corpus : "literally, "you
may have the body". A Habeas
Corpus is a legal writ that protects an individual against arbitrary
imprisonment by requiring that any person arrested be brought before
a court for formal charge. If the charge is considered to be valid,
the person must submit to trial; if not, the person goes free. When
the law is suspended, then individuals can be imprisoned
indefinitely and without charge."
.....
"This
is one of those moments when you want to grab liberals by the lapels
and demand, "Well, what did you expect?" ... A group called the
National Center for Men has filed a lawsuit they are calling "Roe v.
Wade for Men." ... More than three decades
ago Roe vs. Wade gave women control of their reproductive lives but
nothing in the law changed for men. Women can now have sexual
intimacy without sacrificing reproductive choice. Women now have the
freedom and security to enjoy lovemaking without the fear of forced
procreation. Women now have control of their lives after an
unplanned conception. But men are routinely forced to give up
control, forced to be financially responsible for choices only women
are permitted to make, forced to relinquish reproductive choice as
the price of intimacy."
COMMENT: Roe
V. Wade was a "Femi-Narcissistic" decision, looking after the
interests of the Mother only. The principal established there
established was extrapolated into a Mother's "murder rights"
expressed in minimal sentences when murdering their children.
Equal Parenting eliminates much of this.
Father dealt difficult hand by the system
"Even last week, when the family court file of
Elaine and Leo Campione was released to the press -- in
significant measure because Mr. Campione didn't oppose the
media's bid to see it .. There is, to be frank, an
underlying perspective of feminist oppression from which all
else springs. .. Women are seen first as victims --
generally of male power and particularly of husband power -- and
presumed to be truth-tellers and good mothers until proven
otherwise. The starting point for men is that they are abusers
and deadbeat dads in the making unless they can prove the
contrary, and if it takes years for them to demonstrate that, oh
well."
One of our lawyer acquaintances described
a period in his career when he became sick of listening to
the cackles of lesbian judges in their Chambers &
Lounges comparing notes on what measures they were using in
our Courtrooms to terrify and destroy fathers and their
families. He found the glee with which these lesbian
Judges
described their de-humanizing torments of fathers and the helplessness
of their lawyers so disgusting that for a while he started
taking on Family Law cases himself. He soon learned
better, he said, as he accomplished nothing in providing
better Representation, and only made himself a target for
punitive disciplinary measures from within the Law Society.
BC Lawyers consistently tell us that
"At least a third of the Judges and the BC Law Society are
homosexual ... it's probably more like
half.""Forty something" seems a good practical estimate.
One lawyer said "I
dread what will happen when they take over the
Star Chamber." We're not too sure
what that is either, but it is another Secret Society drawn
from the Judges similar to the
"Skull & Bones", the
Jesuits ,or the
Masonic Lodge which by design works outside the Law to
pursue the Legal Class's objectives in
Global Conquest
etc., without the annoying prohibitions of Assassination,
False Accusations, Imprisonment
in Debtor's Prison and so forth.
We
are emphatically warned to "never say anything
negative about homosexuality" because the "forty-something"estimate extends to
"the clerical staff at the BC Courthouses", and that if
a homosexual Teacher or Social Worker wants to get
you into deep, deep trouble, they can write you up in their
Reports as "Homophobic" and send you into the Court System
"flagged".
There it will be fairly certain that a homosexual Court Clerk will see to it you are put
before a rabid Lesbian or "Gay" Judge to be drawn and quartered
simply for having homosexual.
We need to ask the question of our MPs
and Legislators "What personality
testing is required of Candidate for Judicial Office?
It seems fairly apparent that the Judiciary is rife with
Personality Disorders, It is our guess that
there is something inherently
Narcissistic about homosexuality which undesirable in a
Public Officer, and cannot be tolerated in Judge if we are
to live in a "Free and Just" society.
"The BCTF
has created a Homophobia and Heterosexism Action
Group to help support you in your work as teachers
or social justice activists. ... We have
developed a comprehensive action plan with actions and
timelines over a multi-year period." ...
Recall that the "Four Missions" for a
Homosexual Activist's career choice planned out in the
Sixties (related to us by an ex-homosexual organization)
were:
1. Law, the Courts;
2. Teaching;
3. Social Work;
4. Church
Curiously, these are all areas where the Activist can
gain power over Children & Families and where most of us
have suffered terrible deceit and injustices. Prior to
the Election,
Liberal Justice Minister Martin Cauchon had
begun the process of removing from Canadian
Statutes the rights of Natural Parents to satisfy
the demands of Homosexual Activists offended by existing
"Heterosexist" legislation. See
Trociuk. Homosexuals are inherently Sterile.
To compensate, they have apparently developed an
inordinate interest in taking children from Natural
Parents. We have among our members numerous horror
stories of this sort.
2003-08-xx Pedophile Social worker squeezed my penis and
threatened me with never seeing my father again.mp3
Natural Parents are
typically persecuted by these Public
Servants and because
of fear for their children need Anonymity.
Typically, they cannot speak much about their experience
for a decade or two, and are then commonly in financial
ruin. Unions like the BCTF and BCGEU clearly
protect their own from criminal prosecution.
"We
shall sodomize your sons, emblems of
your feeble masculinity, of your shallow
dreams and vulgar lies.
We shall seduce
them in your schools, in your
dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your
locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in
your seminaries, in your youth groups,
in your movie theater bathrooms, in your
army bunkhouses4 in your truck stops, in
your all-male clubs, in your houses of
Congress, wherever men are with
men together.
Your sons will become our
minions and do our bidding. They will be
recast in our image. They will come to
crave and adore us.",
StatsCanada reports the fraction of
Homosexuals and Bisexuals combined
comprise 1.7% of the Canadian population
- that is a 58:1 ratio Hetero :
non-Heterosexuals.
ACT
UP!, the American homosexual activist group, wants homo-marriage
in Canada to extend Canadian health care benefits to AIDS infected
American homosexuals by virtue of "marriage" to Canadian
Homosexuals. With their demands for polygamy, more homosexuals
can be put on a single Canadian's health care package.
We are also told by these same
Activist Judges our local
Community Standards and Zoning Bylawas prohibiting Sex Clubs in our
home neighborhoods and around our Schools are "unconstitutional" and
must be repealed.
polygamy, scc, canada - Google Search;
Marriage & Same Sex Unions <Polygamy in Canada>
Homosexuality and Child Sexual Abuse;
"The circle of abuse is the tragic
legacy of the attempts by homosexuals to
legitimize having sex with boys. For too
many boys it is already too late to
protect them from those who took
advantage of their need for love and
attention. All too many later perpetrate
the abuse by themselves engaging in the
sexual abuse of boys. Only by exposing
the lies, insincere denials, and
deceptions -- including those wrapped in scholastic
garb -- of those who prey sexually on
children, can we hope to build a wall of
protection around the helpless children
among us. ... While
many homosexuals may not seek young
sexual partners, the evidence indicates
that disproportionate numbers of gay men
seek adolescent males or boys as sexual
partners. In this paper we will consider
the following evidence linking
homosexuality to pedophilia:
Pedophiles
are invariably males: Almost all
sex crimes against children are
committed by men. <Based
on convictions perhaps. Sex
Abuse counselors indicate that
almost as many women sexually abuse
children as men. Women, of
course, typically get off.>
Significant
numbers of victims are males:
Up to one-third of all sex
crimes against children are
committed against boys (as opposed
to girls).
The
10 percent fallacy:
Studies indicate that, contrary
to the inaccurate but widely accepted claims of sex researcher Alfred
Kinsey, homosexuals comprise between 1 to 3 percent of the population.
<Maslow offered
to help remedy Kinsey's fatal flaw of researching only a Small Sample
(those interestedenough in extramarital sex to go to his office to be "researched")
and reporting that population's stats as representative of the General
Population. Kinsey clearly needed to go out of his offices to take
an INDEPENDENT SAMPLE, but he didn't. Rather than correct his
falsified statistics, Kinsey ended his long friendship with
Maslow
instead.
Kinsey was, and should continue
to be discredited , for the most part as a Researcher because he became
a full Participant in the various sexual practices being studied rather
than remaining a silent, impartial Observer. Sadly there was little
else to go on at the time.
Homosexuals
are overrepresented in child sex offenses: Individuals from the 1 to
3 percent of the population that is sexually attracted to the same sex
are committing up to one-third of the sex crimes against children.
<StatsCan reports Homosexual and Bisexuals combined are 1.7 % of
Canadians (one POINT seven percent!!!) , indicating homosexuals are ~40
times MORE LIKELY to sexually abuse children than Heterosexuals.>
Reports to us adamantly indicate that Homosexuals have also
invaded the Law Societies, Public Servant and the Justice System,
crippling our Society's "Immune System". "Sexual Nepotism" in the
Sex Clubs has been described as a prominent factor in this issue.
See
Four Missions.
Some homosexual
activists defend the historic
connection between homosexuality and
pedophilia: Such activists
consider the defense of "boy-lovers"
to be a legitimate gay rights issue.
Pedophile
themes abound in homosexual literary
culture:
Gay fiction as well as serious
academic treatises promote
"intergenerational intimacy."
Hall on left, with K of C crest above door and Our Lady of The
Assumption Catholic Church prominent to rightFacilities clearly Catholic and
belonging to Catholic Knights of Columbus
PORT COQUITLAM, BC, December 7, 2005 (
LifeSiteNews.com) – Two lesbians awarded damages from a
BC Human Rights Tribunal
for being denied a Knights of Columbus hall rental for their same-sex “wedding”
claimed they were completely unaware that the hall was affiliated with the
Catholic Church.
Pictures of the hall obtained by
LifeSiteNews.com reveal its
undeniable inclusion in a complex that included Our Lady of the Assumption
Catholic Church and Our Lady of the Assumption Catholic School. Not only do the
pictures reveal that the hall is part of the same three-acre parcel of land, but
the walls of the buildings are all identical in colour.
The pictures also clearly reveal the Knight’s coat of arms prominently
displayed, as are pictures obviously relating to the Catholic faith, such as the
picture in the announcement board of a young priest with the caption, “One good
priest can make a difference . . . Vocations are everybody’s business.”
Our Lady of The Assumption Catholic School located immediately to
the left of the K of C Hall
David Hauser, who managed the hall at the time, told LifeSiteNews.com that
“There’s a large cross on that Church.” He added, “There’s a picture of the Pope
in the hall . . . there’s no way they didn’t know we were connected to the
Church.”
More significantly, Hauser revealed to LifeSiteNews.com this week that Tracey
Smith, one of the two women who rented the hall, was a co-worker of his who,
along with a number of other openly gay co-workers at the Costco warehouse, very
well knew of his involvement with the Catholic men’s organization and his
connection with the hall prior to the controversial visit two years ago. As
well, the tribunal decision noted that both Smith and Chymyshyn "knew the
Catholic Church's view on same-sex marriage" and "had they known who the Knights
were, they would not have rented the hall."
The door through which the two women entered hall - note prominent K
of C crest and announcement board
The Tribunal decision reported that “Both parties spent considerable time
describing the hall and the placement within it of the crucifix, a picture of
the ascension [sic] (should have read assumption) of the Virgin Mary, a picture
of the Pope and pictures of the leaders of the Knights.” Amazingly, the Tribunal
Panel admitted that "There is no question that these items were displayed in the
Hall," and yet nevertheless stated it "accepts the evidence of the
complainants", who knew of the Catholic Church's vews on same-sex 'marriage',
"that they did not take notice of these items."
Large crucifix prominent over one end of hall
The tribunal then acknowledged, “Even if the complainants had noticed those
items, the Panel is not persuaded that they would have made the connection
between them, the Knights, and the fact that the Hall was a building with
religious significance that may have had restrictions as to the types of events
that could take place there.”
Announcement board with clearly Catholic notices and priest Photo
that was there 2 years ago
The Tribunal “accepts that the complainants did not know who the Knights were
or their affiliation with the Catholic Church,” they concluded.
Picture of Pope John Paul II the most prominent photo at top centre
of photos of Knight officers in hall
In 2003, Smith and Deborah Chymyshyn rented the hall in Port Coquitlam. When
the Knights became aware that it was to be for a homosexual couple, which would
be in violation of Knights and Catholic principles, they cancelled the booking.
The Tribunal heard the case in January and the ruling was handed down this past
Nov. 30th.
Canada's only leadership camp for
"lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans-identified, two-spirited,
intersexed, queer, questioning and allied youth" made
its debut yesterday in B.C. With the
three-day event on an unnamed island in Howe Sound comes
a chance for the province's young "sexual minority" to
have their own space -- perhaps for the first time in
their lives.
"The youth can just be completely free to be themselves,
and they don't have to worry about some of the negative
consequences or . . . the stigma just associated with
expressing themselves," said
Rod Knight, the camp's B.C. director. Knight,
29, calls the camp a "social-health
and education intervention" for a group
that does not have enough community support.
Camp fYrefly was founded by university researchers
at the University of Alberta in 2004. ..."the camp is a chance to mentor young
people...
Everyone should celebrate themselves,"
Note that in Homosexual culture
"Celebration" commonly means heavy partying and orgies.
Note also that taking kids away from their familiar
surroundings and relationships and putting them in a
boot camp like
Camp fYrefly is the well-tested brainwashing
technique of numerous Cults at which they can impose a
Paradigm Shift.on
a Candidate.
2006-01-19
The Straight slate - Port Moody–Westwood–Port Coquitlam, Mary Woo
Siims, Straight.com;
"Mary Woo Sims, the former chief commissioner of the
BC Human Rights Commission,
is a hero to some in the gay and lesbian community for her record as
a defender and promoter of human rights.
Sims, a motorcycle-riding lesbian, lost a bid last year to
get elected to Coquitlam city council",
Georgia Straight
An article documenting the observable technique of "Evil" people
of masquerading to the Taxpayer as the "savior" of their intended victims.
Pedophiles are just one example of those
using this technique of pretension. Stark examples of unfettered Evil
observed in BC are the Ministries of Children and Families; and the Women's
Shelters.
MCF staff commonly use their statutory powers to remove children
into the care of their friends. Women's shelters, a first-hand observer &
Women's Shelter Victim tells us, are commonly run by lesbians who use our
Women's Shelters to seduce women in crisis and teach them doctrines of
Father-Hatred on penalty
of loosing the benefits we fund not for
Homosexual Activists, but for needy women in true distress. (We
see numbers around five percent as the confirmed estimates of Women's Shelters
that are being used for their intended purpose.) In describing her her
flight across the Provinces this woman described how her refusals to become
sexually involved with the Women's Shelter Management
typically resulted in
expulsion and threats, making it necessary for her to run serially to new
Shelters. The network of lesbian Shelter managers had already put out the
word on her, however, and our member reported she had been "marked" for sexual
harassment and abuse in each new Women's Shelter. She was adamant that
most of the Women's Shelters she ran to were controlled by lesbians looking to
seduce and indoctrinate heterosexual women in distress. After passing
through two or three provinces like this, she learned eventually to NEVER go to
a Women's Shelter, as her life had then been threatened so many times by
lesbians seeking her harm. She now lives in fear for her life.
2006-02-14
Gay Activists Ask Canada to Lower Age of Consent for Anal Sex, National Post
Agrees; "Homosexual activists have long sought to
distance themselves from pedophiles, however Canada's most
prominent homosexual activist group has now demanded the lowering the age of
consent for anal sex to 16 from 18. Surprisingly, Canada's National Post,
regarded by some as a 'conservative' paper has come out in favour of the
proposal." COMMENT:
The Post clearly is ignoring the rather obvious interests of
NAMBLA members of the homosexual community in this stupefied opinion.
age of consent - Google News
"Perhaps
the supreme irony underlying this name-calling by gay extremists was
revealed in a recent Washington Blade
(D.C.'s gay tabloid) "First Person" article (January 31, 1991),
in which
ACT
UP/
D.C. founder Eric M. Pollard made the following startling
admissions:
"I have helped to create a truly fascist
organization..."
"The
decision to create
ACT UP/D.C. was
conceived when I and another early member attended at OUT! rally. I had
taken copious amounts of LSD. We were impressed with the energy, and
with the self- righteous anger of the crowd."
"We
conspired to bring into existence an activist group that... could
effectively exploit the media for its own ends, and that would
work
covertly and break the law with impunity... <See
Judicial Impunity for Activist Judges> Under the
influence of powerful, illicit drugs, it really seemed like a good
idea".
That the group subscribed to consciously "subversive
modes, drawn largely from the voluminous
Mein Kampf [by Adolf Hitler], which some of us
studied as a working model. As
ACT
UP/D.C. grew, we struck intently and surgically into whatever
institution we believed to stand in our way..." (emphasis added).
Strange
admissions indeed, about a group given to stridently
accusing its opposition of employing
"neo-Nazi" tactics (one of which happens to be accusing your
opposition of acts and attitudes of which
you
are, in fact, guilty). Evidently, this kind of gay extremist
view readily coincides with Adolf Hitler's opinion in
Mein Kampf: "The victor will never be asked if he told
the truth."
2006-02-06 Gay organisation launches blood war;
"The GLA called on its members to donate blood
without disclosing their sexual orientation in protest of the
policy preventing gay men from donating blood."
This
appears to be a similar campaign to that of
Aides Coalition to Unleash Power (ACT UP!) in the late
eighties.
ACT UP! was then going coast to coast, both sides of the
border in their War against the AIDS' appellation as "the
gay disease". They were on radio asking infected
homosexuals to give blood and infect young heterosexual women to
transmit AIDES into the heterosexual population. Only then,
ACT UP! said would governments spend money on AIDS Research.
In the intervening period, young heterosexual Canadian women
have been identified as the group with the greatest incidence of
new AIDS infections.
In same campaign,
ACT UP! was pushing for homosexual marriage in Canada so
that American homosexuals could receive AIDS treatments at the
Canadian Taxpayer's expense. We believe the story has not
been told of what impact
ACT UP!'s activity in Canada has had on Canadian
Legislation. Expect homosexuals from around the globe to descend
upon Canadians for AIDS treatment and sex changes under their
new "spousal" rights. Even greater pressure will then be
put on the rights of all NATURAL PARENTS and their
children, already being rejected by the Activist Judges of the
SCC and lower Courts.
Copyright 2002 equalparenting-bc.ca
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.
Teachers
would be necessary to stop the present use of our Schools for
Political Indoctrination by Activists. See also
![[John Sharpe]](images/1999-01-16_sharpe-john-robin-w220.jpg)
