senators know that I have studied a terrible and pernicious
heart of darkness
that has developed in our court system, being the use of
FALSE ACCUSATIONS in civil justice.
is the mischief of litigating parties, usually mothers,
suddenly within the context of divorce and within child
custody proceedings falsely accusing the other party,
usually fathers, of the sexual abuse of their own children.
FALSE ACCUSATIONS are often made with the overt
or covert complicity of their
lawyers. They are a
lethal weapon in the business of parental alienation. They
are a tool for achieving sole custody of children and
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage
16.10 Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal
BREACH OF TRUST"
the ideas that the State assigns
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from
pre-war Nazi Germany. Under the British system
rights are not State-given, but God Given.
Buying into the Court's position that what
rights remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same
position that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and
Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and
they will likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these
This is completely FALSE. The Judges
are Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT
CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
PARLIAMENT has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was
only observed and documented by individuals sent out by the
newly Norman Crown after the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the
laws and customs of the various peoples of Britain..
This was done with a view to aggregate existing customs
which may vary across the land, into a unified body of
Laws. The Authority quoted by the Commoners in their
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
The process of documentation took only a
couple of hundred years, and
the product was a STATIC body of Law which was historical,
popular, and has served in the intervening centuries as a
Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
Corpus : "literally, "you
may have the body". A Habeas
Corpus is a legal writ that protects an individual against arbitrary
imprisonment by requiring that any person arrested be brought before
a court for formal charge. If the charge is considered to be valid,
the person must submit to trial; if not, the person goes free. When
the law is suspended, then individuals can be imprisoned
indefinitely and without charge."
Skeletons in the Closet, a film drawn from the dramatized lives
of families living with a protected
Pedophile and the mental
illness it may create when a loving, faithful, Victim keeps the
Secret. This is shockingly
common. The Secret is their Power -
(You would be well advised to stay away from the Public Servant.)
a) NOT report results of studies which do
not show "expected results", and
b) if "unexpected results do eventually get
reported, they may only be reported with "expert" commentary to
explain away the deviation from the expected result that "Men are
violent" and "Women are their Victims".
The World Health has as a primary Sponsor, the
Rockefeller Foundations, a
Fabian Socialist group
which has as it's aim the conversion of the West to a Soviet style
block which can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.
See Norman Dodd.
Opponents of Equal Parenting like to tell you
that seventy something percent of Custody Cases don't go to Trial,
and are awarded as Sole Custody to Mom BY CONSENT.
What they don't tell you is that in ninety
something percent of Custody Cases that do go to Trial Mom gets Sole
Custody anyway, and Dad has to pay on top of his Lawyer fees, the
Court Costs for having lost his Application. Faced with these
abysmal odds, Dads are commonly told to "Just give her what she
wants so you can have a good relationship with her". Under
Duress many Dads foolishly acquiesce .... for
a time at least......
We prefer that Natural Parents NOT sign a Consent
Order that is not completely Equal with respect to Gender, as the
relationship of the divorced couple is greatly destabilized with
each injury to the equality of parental powers .
Pedophile Activists obviously don't go around
telling you what they're up to. Instead they call
themselves "Mentors", "Social
Workers", "Feminists" or "Homosexual Rights Activists". In
Canada, Pedophile Activists have been successful in getting
greater access to children by reducing the
of Consent to ,
and in eliminating a parents "right to know" when the child reaches
the age of
replacing them with school counselors and
Social Workers, and by, of course, eradicating fathers from
their children's lives entirely from birth on request by the mother.
the recent changes to accommodate homosexual marriage, the right of
natural parents to "parent" their natural children will soon be
removed entirely. Through these statutory changes, the term
"LEGAL PARENT" is replacing the
historic term "NATURAL PARENT"
in Canadian statutes. As a result Natural
Parents can no longer automatically claim to be the Legal Parents of
their own natural children at birth. Instead, to accommodate
the Homosexual Activists' plan to push Natural Parents aside when it
comes to parenting children, the Courts alone now decide who will be
the "parents' of all children born in Canada.
Activists are often lawyers, school counselors, teachers,
Social Workers, Sex Ed teachers,
pastors, Judges, etc. etc. They seek positions with access and
power over Children & Families, and positions to create social and
political change. The publicly undisclosed prevalence of
Pedophile & Homosexual Activists in our civil service has been
attributed to their determined politicism in the many groups like
ACT UP! , the secrecy of the
alliances made in various "secret societies" and sex clubs, and to
Sexual Nepotism in the workplace.
Imputed Income: Imaginary Income "Imputed" to Dads to
fraudulently raise Child Support Orders is Criminal Breach of Trust
Income: Imaginary Income "Imputed" to Dads to
fraudulently raise Child Support Orders is Criminal
Breach of Trust
The Child Support Tables depend upon
an Income of the Payor only to determine from the Tables
the Child Support Payment to be paid.
The extortionate sums used in the
Tables were were first passed as part of a package
Legislation. (Once the Child Support Tables were
passed, the rest of the FTSOTC Package was cast off.)
The Tables as passed incorporated the incomes of
BOTH parents (the only sensible way to do it) but
the Liberals pressed by Hedy Fry and SOW with a Majority
Government dropped the Income of the Payee (ie, Mom)
from the Calculations, relieving the Payee (Mom) the
obligation to use her income to support the Children.
Initiatives to make Child Support contingent upon on the
Custodial Parents fulfilling her obligation to fulfill
the terms of the Custody Agreement failed. Instead
more jobs for Public Servants were created to enforce
the payment of Child Support ONLY.
the problems already presented to Dads by these methods
only, Judges started 'Imputing" income to
artificially boost the Child Support Payments put upon
Dads who are not earning enough to support payment the
Judge has predetermined. For example, Hal was a
Widower and had a daughter, Danica, from a previous
marriage. Hal then had two children with a
new wife while living on an island near Courtenay where
the cost of living was very low. Hal was a Potter.
Mom left Hal when the two new children were toddlers.
(She is reported to have taken up with her Courtenay
lawyer - not an uncommon scenario - while their greatly
appreciated Island Property was liquidated under very
peculiar circumstances.) When our BC Family
Courts put Hal through it's torments of
Debtor's Prison, they imposed these same torments on
his daughter Danica, then a Tween. You can see
where that left BOTH Hal & Danica: homeless and
dependent on the kindnesses of neighbors for survival.
When Courtenay's Judge Higenbotham Ordered Hal to Jail
Debtor's Prison) for non-payment of
Higenbotham was ordering his daughter Danica to be not
only homeless and penniless, but also Fatherless.
In spite of all the other things being done to him,
Hal's emphasis was that the
Support Tables assume the only children to support
are the Payee's children. Hal tried unsuccessfully
Danica Petition to have recognized what BC Judges do
mindlessly to a Father in Family Court they also do to
his children from a previous marriage.
Themis Ltd." Mercenary Bounty Hunters for
FMEP, Chris Beresford, Director
say it is their
"Policy" to NEVER return OVERPAYMENTS on Child Support.
They say it is their "Policy" or to NOT
acknowledge Payments to the Payee directly without going through
their Office, saying such payments are "Gifts" only,
and will NOT be considered by them to be payments of Child
Support. They say their "Policy" of removing
Passports and Drivers' Licenses, and spreading around your SINs
to strangers NOT involved in taxation is justified by the
"Greater Good"of defending a
Child's Right to receive
Support Payments. They claim Themis is a "Creation of Statute",
exercising only the powers given it by Parliament. See
Issues: Breach of
Trust of a Public Officer, Criminal
Themis operates as
We have known of Moms who, having seen what Themis has done to
Dad, have waived payment of Child Support to stop
Themis' attacks, but Themis has refused to stop.
Imputed Income to fraudulently raise Child
Imaginary Income "Imputed" to Dads to fraudulently
raise Child Support Payments is Criminal Breach of Trust
If a BC Judge thinks the Child Support you
pay based on your real Income isn't enough, they might impute Income to
you to artificially boost the Support Cheque. These "judgments' can be
free-wheeling, arbitrary and punitive for all members of the Victim's
The common practice in BC Courts when Fathers
do not pay Child Support -
which most of the time is merely
Imputed - is to send non-paying Father to Prison until he
or his family members pay the fees imposed by the Judge.
Even when mothers agree that Child Support
should no longer be paid, we find that the
agencies, which are private contractors functioning as
Bounty Hunters, typically refuse to end their claim on the
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY
Parents' Rights now gone with my
Homosexual Marriage bill"
16.10 Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule
has to go to conform
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held
in criminal BREACH OF TRUST"
the ideas that the State assigns
& Responsibilities to it's Citizen is
straight from pre-war Nazi Germany.
Under the British system rights are not
State-given, but God Given.
the Court's position that what rights remain
are Children's Rights, is buying into the
same position that "<Natural> Parents have
no rights", and Canadian Children are at
birth the property of the Courts.
Affirmative Action has made White Heterosexual Anglophone Males (WHAMs) a Class
of employment ineligibility & PC Hatred since 1980
"I get government cheques..... you stupid
Canadians.. I get government cheques.", Korean Realtor
Canadian Affirmative Action programs coupled with massive
immigration from "non-traditional" sources to accommodate UN commitments
precluded white males and many white females from employment and progressive
employment in government offices.
These same White Males are now routinely subjected to Imputed
Income by Family court Judges - the majority of whom are beneficiaries of
Affirmative Action programs - when Dad's incomes aren't as high as the Judge
expects them to be.
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.