"Honorable
senators know that I have studied a terrible and pernicious
heart of darkness
that has developed in our court system, being the use of
FALSE ACCUSATIONS in civil justice.
"This
is the mischief of litigating parties, usually mothers,
suddenly within the context of divorce and within child
custody proceedings falsely accusing the other party,
usually fathers, of the sexual abuse of their own children.
,,,
"These
FALSE ACCUSATIONS are often made with the overt
or covert complicity of their
lawyers. They are a
lethal weapon in the business of parental alienation. They
are a tool for achieving sole custody of children and
creating fatherlessness."
"Natural
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
"Natural
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage
bill"
16.10 Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to
conform
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal
BREACH OF TRUST"
FYI,
the ideas that the State assigns
Rights &
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from
pre-war Nazi Germany. Under the British system
rights are not State-given, but God Given.
Buying into the Court's position that what
rights remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same
position that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and
Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.
In
"Women and the Process of Constitutional Reform"
McLellan warns that <Horrors!>
"Provincial
Legislatures may impose a presumption of Joint Custody...
and perpetuate the domination of men over women"
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and
they will likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these
days".
This is completely FALSE. The Judges
are Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT
CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
1649, only
PARLIAMENT has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was
only observed and documented by individuals sent out by the
newly Norman Crown after the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the
laws and customs of the various peoples of Britain..
This was done with a view to aggregate existing customs
which may vary across the land, into a unified body of
Laws. The Authority quoted by the Commoners in their
administration of
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
Bible and
principles of
Danelaw
The process of documentation took only a
couple of hundred years, and
the product was a STATIC body of Law which was historical,
popular, and has served in the intervening centuries as a
Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
Instead their position to promote the
"rights" of a "Parent" in the widest sense of the
word, making NO distinction between
NATURAL PARENTS and
wannaabe
Legal Parents. They have bowed to
University of
Victoria's assertion that the SCC's
Trociuk
Decision
"endorses a Heterosexual View of the Family and must be
ignored", legitimizing the ongoing
Child
Trafficking by the State which views
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in
the lucrative Child
Adoption Market They refuse to be hampered by prior
obligations to that pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can
Veto an Adoption.
It appears that many
"Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United
Nations and Liberal
Irwin Cotler's assertion that the
Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent
has "NO RIGHTS",
making the State, not the Natural
Parents the Protector of the Child..
Without Cause or
Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!
"In spite of credible revelations dating back to April 2002
about Bill Graham, a sex addicted bi-sexual sodomizing a 15
year old male prostitute named
Lawrence Metherel,
Paul Martin allowed Graham to remain
Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister - and eventually named
him to the portfolio of Minister of Defense.
"On Sept. 28/2005 a vote was held in Parliament to raise the
age of consent from 14 (one of the lowest age of consents in
the world) to 16 (an age which many still consider too low).
"Bill Graham, Paul Martin, and Anne McLellan, on Sept. 28th,
voted against raising the age of consent to 16
"The Family Courts
are <generally> a bunch of second rate hangers-on
... build each other's businesses through
referrals...Family Law is a <parasitic> self-sustaining
Industry"
Habeas
Corpus : "literally, "you
may have the body". A Habeas
Corpus is a legal writ that protects an individual against arbitrary
imprisonment by requiring that any person arrested be brought before
a court for formal charge. If the charge is considered to be valid,
the person must submit to trial; if not, the person goes free. When
the law is suspended, then individuals can be imprisoned
indefinitely and without charge."
.....
Skeletons in the Closet, a film drawn from the dramatized lives
of families living with a protected
Pedophile and the mental
illness it may create when a loving, faithful, Victim keeps the
Secret. This is shockingly
common. The Secret is their Power -
BREAK IT!
(You would be well advised to stay away from the Public Servant.)
FYI, most of what you hear
about Family Violence is a huge fraud because
World Health Organization
obligates members to:
a) NOT report results of studies which do
not show "expected results", and
b) if "unexpected results do eventually get
reported, they may only be reported with "expert" commentary to
explain away the deviation from the expected result that "Men are
violent" and "Women are their Victims".
The World Health has as a primary Sponsor, the
Rockefeller Foundations, a
Fabian Socialist group
which has as it's aim the conversion of the West to a Soviet style
block which can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.
See Norman Dodd.
It seems any time the Crimes of a
"Friend of the Court" gets forced into the Public Eye, BC Courts
provide their buddy with a
Special Prosecutor to minimize their
sentences and hopefully get them back in business as fast as
possible. Aren't these crooks supposed to receive
Trial By Jury?
Opponents of Equal Parenting like to tell you
that seventy something percent of Custody Cases don't go to Trial,
and are awarded as Sole Custody to Mom BY CONSENT.
What they don't tell you is that in ninety
something percent of Custody Cases that do go to Trial Mom gets Sole
Custody anyway, and Dad has to pay on top of his Lawyer fees, the
Court Costs for having lost his Application. Faced with these
abysmal odds, Dads are commonly told to "Just give her what she
wants so you can have a good relationship with her". Under
such
Duress many Dads foolishly acquiesce .... for
a time at least......
We prefer that Natural Parents NOT sign a Consent
Order that is not completely Equal with respect to Gender, as the
relationship of the divorced couple is greatly destabilized with
each injury to the equality of parental powers .
Pedophile Activists obviously don't go around
telling you what they're up to. Instead they call
themselves "Mentors", "Social
Workers", "Feminists" or "Homosexual Rights Activists". In
Canada, Pedophile Activists have been successful in getting
greater access to children by reducing the
Age
of Consent to ,
and in eliminating a parents "right to know" when the child reaches
the age of
,
replacing them with school counselors and
Social Workers, and by, of course, eradicating fathers from
their children's lives entirely from birth on request by the mother.
With
the recent changes to accommodate homosexual marriage, the right of
natural parents to "parent" their natural children will soon be
removed entirely. Through these statutory changes, the term
"LEGAL PARENT" is replacing the
historic term "NATURAL PARENT"
in Canadian statutes. As a result Natural
Parents can no longer automatically claim to be the Legal Parents of
their own natural children at birth. Instead, to accommodate
the Homosexual Activists' plan to push Natural Parents aside when it
comes to parenting children, the Courts alone now decide who will be
the "parents' of all children born in Canada.
Pedophile
Activists are often lawyers, school counselors, teachers,
Social Workers, Sex Ed teachers,
YWCA leaders,
pastors, Judges, etc. etc. They seek positions with access and
power over Children & Families, and positions to create social and
political change. The publicly undisclosed prevalence of
Pedophile & Homosexual Activists in our civil service has been
attributed to their determined politicism in the many groups like
ACT UP! , the secrecy of the
alliances made in various "secret societies" and sex clubs, and to
Sexual Nepotism in the workplace.
CHILDREN need BOTH NATURAL PARENTS and ALL NATURAL
GRAND-PARENTS!
Repeal
Activist-imposed Homosexual Marriage Legislation and
Restore the right of NATURAL PARENTS to their own children!
"Granting
gay couples the right to have children by definition means giving at
least one of the partners the right to have someone else's
children, and the question arises whether the
original parent or parents ever agreed to part with them or committed
some transgression to warrant losing them.Current law
governing
divorce, domestic
violence, and child abuse render this question open.
... gay marriages and
gay adoption ..
ensued
once government officials got into the business .. of distributing other
people's children."
RoadKill Radio Special! Is the Supreme
Court of Canada Corrupt or Stupid? Join Ron Gray as he
interviews KARI SIMPSON about her exposé of the Courts and her
Drive For Justice
Fathers'
rights activist
Stephen
Baskerville,
president of the
American Coalition for Fathers and
Children--describes why a child
needs its father’s presence and
discusses how our society is working
against the maintenance of the core
family structure
and how that can be changed.
(10/11/06);
Stephen Baskerville.ram Audio
(81:07)
Nearly
all divorces are initiated by
the woman. By complying
with the temptations provided by
the State, the State effectively
becomes her Husband.
Feminism has been the driving
force in the destruction of
Families, and has
effectively abolished Marriage
as a legal Contract
Morality is principally learned
from the Father, and is not well
learned in a single mother home.
overwhelmingly, the
most likely perpetrator of
physical abuse of children is
the single mother
overwhelmingly
the most likely
perpetrator of sexual abuse of
children is the unrelated male
in the household (whom we
affectingly call "Number Two")
Government apparatus created to
collect Child Support from lower
class fathers who have abandoned
the Children has been expanded
to hound middle class fathers
who have not abandoned their
children into poverty.
In
the nineteenth century when
fathers got automatic custody of
children, Divorce was very rare.
Courts must not continue to
operated in Secret but must be
investigated and exposed
Under the Clinton administration
children came to be used as
Weapons
Barbara Kay on
Roadkill Radio with Kari Simpson &
Terry O'Neal
National
Post’s columnist extraordinaire,
will join Kari and Terry for what is
sure to be a lively, educational and
no-holds-barred discussion of how
the bully tactics of radical
feminism have adversely affected our
courts, social policies and
families. This is a must listen to
and forward to your friends
interview”! Check out Barbara Kay’s
website
here and
click here to read her speech on
the betrayal of the feminist ideal –
“Who’s oppressing who?”
"The Family
Courts are a bunch of second rate hangers-on
... build each other's businesses through
referrals...Family Law is a <parasitic> self-sustaining
Industry"
"Description:
Since the introduction of the so called “No
Fault Divorce” in Canada, the divorce industry has
evidenced unprecedented growth estimated at $6 billion
per year. The problem is that the Legal / Court industry
thrives off the $B’s generated by Tax payers and
Families in crises. For this they provide no value and
in fact cause destruction of families by unnecessarily
removing fathers from children’s lives and lowering the
standard of living for all family members. This is done
through unnecessary litigation, biased decisions and
unreasonable support orders which escalate conflict to
perpetuate the status quo in support of their self
serving business. The Solution is to update divorce laws
to reflect parental equality and get families out of
court eliminating significant grief and $'s wasted by
families and taxpayers. An alternative to courts is
identified in the book."
Instead of implementing the whittled
down "Shared Parenting" recommendations of
FTSOTC, Liberals instead sought to
ELIMINATE Natural Parents rights, the
Maximum Contact Principle, and the
Friendly Parent Rule of 16.10
in
Bill
C-22. This Bill failed, until
it's content to eliminate Natural Parent's Rights
was repackaged
in part
into the "Same Sex" legislation.
"The
nuclear family must be destroyed ... Whatever its
ultimate meaning, the break-up of families now is an
objectively revolutionary process" -
Linda Gordon
"We
can't destroy the inequities between men and women until
we destroy marriage" -
Robin Morgan, Ms. Magazine
;
"I feel that
'man-hating' is an honourable and viable political act,
that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against
the class that is oppressing them." -
Robin Morgan, Ms. Magazine Editor
"I
want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a
high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the
mouth of a pig" -
Andrea Dworkin
"Marriage as an institution developed
from rape as a practice" -
Andrea Dworkin
"Heterosexual intercourse is the
pure, formalized expression of contempt for women's
bodies" -
Andrea Dworkin
"The
institution of sexual intercourse is anti-feminist"
..
"Feminism is the theory,
lesbianism is the practice"
-
Ti-Grace Atkinson
Homosexual
Violence
Violence and Homosexuality;
"The top six U.S. male serial killers were all
gay < as are
40-something % of Canadian Law Faculties, Law Societies, and the
Judiciary, "common knowledge" among lawyers>
Juan Corona was
convicted of murdering 25 migrant workers (he "made love"
with their corpses).
"Lesbian
Aileen Wuornos laid claim in 1992 to "worst female killer" with
at least 7 middle-aged male victims. She singlehandedly topped
the lesbian nurse team of Catherine Wood and Gwen Graham, who
had killed 6 convalescent patients in Grand Rapids, Michigan.
The association between serial murder and homosexuality isn’t
recent..... "
"Opponents of same
sex-marriage claimed a major victory yesterday after a
respected constitutional expert issued the legal opinion
that Parliament could define marriage as a union between
a man and a woman without contravening the Supreme
Court's comments on the issue. According to Eugene
Meehan, a former national president of the Canadian Bar
Association and former executive legal officer of the
Supreme Court, Canada's highest court has not required
Parliament to amend the Traditional definition, nor has
gay marriage received protection under the Charter of
Rights and Freedoms."
Comment:
Go to
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Why
the discrepancy between the SCC Judges' claims,
emphasized vociferously by the Liberals in the last
election, and the Statute? We suggest the problem
is the prevalence of Career Activists -
"New Priests" they call themselves -
purposefully positioning themselves in our Judiciaries
to subvert the powers of the Canadian Electorate and
their elected members of Parliament. In truth the
Charter in TWO places (Section 15.1
Equality Rights and again in Section 28:
General.), the Courts are by Statute of Parliament
and the Legislatures, instructed they MAY NOT
DISCRIMINATE BASED ON GENDER - an every day occurrence
in Family Courts. If Overturnings of Provincial
Court rulings by the Supreme Court of Canada are a
measure of legitimacy or competence, the BC Courts have
the worst record of any Province in the country.
Based on five-year averages, BC, with roughly 14% of the
national population, represents about 35% of the
Canadian Supreme Court Overturnings of Provincial Court
rulings.
Stay up to date on
Bill C-38:
Click here for Bill C-38's current status
A special committee has been formed to conduct an
in-depth study on Bill C-38. Contact information for the
members of this committee can be found [here]
We
apologize that the following figures have not been
developed for the Province of BC specifically. We
hope to do this over time. We do know, however
that women often move to BC from Alberta and the rest of
Canada to have their divorces done here in BC where the
misandry of the Family Courts
will maximize their powers to destroy their husbands.
Children from fatherless
homes account for:
63% of youth suicides.
(Source: US Dept. of Health & Human Services, Bureau
of the Census).
71% of pregnant
teenagers. (Source: US Dept. of Health & Human
Services)
90% of all homeless and
runaway children.
70% of juveniles in
state-operated institutions come from fatherless
homes (Source: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Special
Report, Sept 1988)
85% of all children that
exhibit behavioral disorders. (Source: Center for
Disease Control).
80% of rapists motivated
with displaced anger. (Source: Criminal Justice &
Behavior, Vol. 14, p. 403-26, 1978).
71% of all high school
dropouts. (Source: National Principals Association
Report on the State of High Schools).
75% of all adolescent
patients in chemical abuse centers. (Source:
Rainbows for all God's Children).
85% of all youths
sitting in prisons. (Source: Fulton Co. Georgia jail
populations, Texas Dept. of Corrections 1992).
Children
from fatherless homes are:
11 times more likely to
exhibit violent behavior than children from intact
"married" homes.
5 times more likely to
commit suicide.
32 times more likely to
runaway.
20 times more likely to
have behavioral disorders.
14 times more likely to
commit rape.
9 times more likely to
drop out of high school.
10 times more likely to
abuse chemical substances.
9 times more likely to
end up in state-operated institutions.
20 times more likely to
end up in prison.
"37.9% of fathers have no
access/visitation rights."
(Source: p.6, col.II, para. 6, lines 4 &
5, Census Bureau P-60, #173, Sept 1991.)
"40% of mothers reported that they had interfered
with the non-custodial father's visitation on at least
one occasion, to punish the ex-spouse." (Source:
p. 449, col. II, lines 3-6, (citing Fulton) Frequency of
visitation by Divorced Fathers; Differences in Reports
by Fathers and Mothers. Sanford Braver et al, Am. J. of
Orthopsychiatry, 1991.)
"Overall, approximately 50% of mothers
"see no value in the father's continued contact with his
children...."
(Source: Surviving the Breakup, Joan
Kelly & Judith Wallerstein, p. 125) Only 11% of mothers
value their husband's input when it comes to handling
problems with their kids. Teachers & doctors rated 45%,
and close friends & relatives rated %16.(Source: EDK
Associates survey of 500 women for Redbook Magazine.
Redbook, November 1994, p. 36)
"The former spouse (mother) was the
greatest obstacle to having more frequent contact with
the children." (Source:
Increasing our understanding of fathers who have
infrequent contact with their children, James Dudley,
Family Relations, Vol. 4, p. 281, July 1991.)
"A clear majority (70%) of fathers felt
that they had too little time with their children."
(Source: Visitation and
the Noncustodial Father, Mary Ann Kock & Carol Lowery,
Journal of Divorce, Vol. 8, No. 2, p. 54, Winter 1984.)
"Very few of the children were satisfied
with the amount of contact with their fathers, after
divorce." (Source:
Visitation and the Noncustodial Father, Koch & Lowery,
Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, Vol. 8, No. 2, p. 50,
Winter 1984.)
"Feelings of anger towards their former spouses
hindered effective involvement on the part of fathers;
angry mothers would sometimes sabotage father's efforts
to visit their children." (Source: Ahrons and
Miller, Am. Journal of Orthopsychiatry, Vol. 63. p. 442,
July 1993.)
"Mothers may prevent visits to retaliate
against fathers for problems in their marital or
post-marital relationship."
(Source: Seltzer, Shaeffer & Charing,
Journal of Marriage & the Family, Vol. 51, p. 1015,
November 1989.)
In a
study: "Visitational Interference - A National Study" by
Ms. J Annette Vanini, M.S.W. and Edward Nichols, M.S.W.,
it was found that 77% of non-custodial fathers are NOT
able to "visit" their children, as ordered by the court,
as a result of "visitation interference" perpetuated by
the custodial parent. In other words, non-compliance
with court ordered visitation is three times the problem
of non-compliance with court ordered child support and
impacts the children of divorce even more. Originally
published Sept. 1992
Child
Support
Information from multiple sources show that only 10% of
all non-custodial fathers fit the "deadbeat dad"
category: 90% of the fathers with joint custody paid the
support due. Fathers with visitation rights pay 79.1%;
and 44.5% of those with NO visitation rights still
financially support their children. (Source: Census
Bureau report. Series P-23, No. 173).
Additionally, of those not paying support, 66% are not
doing so because they lack the financial resources to
pay (Source: GAO report: GAO/HRD-92-39 FS).
The following is sourced from: Technical Analysis Paper
No. 42, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
Office of Income Security Policy, Authors: Meyer and
Garansky.
Custodial mothers who
receive a support award: 79.6%
Custodial fathers who
receive a support award: 29.9%
Non-custodial mothers
who totally default on support: 46.9%
Non-custodial fathers
who totally default on support: 26.9%
Judges and their elite
Star Chamber entrench their power and status to rule
over Canadians with impunity and unbridled
narcissism.
Feminist and Homosexual Activists as
Judges effect their political agenda without the consent
of the Canadian demographic. They with full
knowledge and intent (scripted in the sixties &
seventies by their Activist writers) circumvent due
democratic process and knowingly contravene the founding
legal constructs of Canada in the BNA & in the Charter
of Rights and Freedoms. Activist Judges happily
and routinely breach the Trust placed in them by their
employer, the Canadian Taxpayer.
Lawyers routinely Entice into
self-destruction and financial rape vast numbers of
families entering their doors. Because of the
Statutory self-regulation of the BC Law Society, we know
of no limiting factor to cap the Activism of the
Judiciary other than prosecuting Judges and Lawyers who
exceed the powers granted them by Statute.
The BC Law Society pimps BC women,
and use them as their hookers. With others (also
conspicuously funded by the Taxpayer), Law Society
members instruct women to hook fathers and families into
the Courts and the financial ruin a "Legal Marriage"
entails. Children NEED this threat to their
security to be EXTERMINATED.
Faced with the entrenched Father
Hatred and Affirmative Action of the burgeoning civil
service, boys and young men despair. Having no
vision for a Future or a university education, they
become prone to fulfill the Father Hatred prophecies of
BC university's Women's Studies faculties and Feminist
Activists.
"Dear
Senators:
For over thirty years I have practiced family law in Ontario and
during that time have watched the development of the law and the
dramatically changed social conditions which have not only seen
a very high percentage of married women move into the work force
in most every area but have also seen a significant narrowing of
the income differentials between men and women. During that same
period I have watched spousal social expectations change in that
husbands have embraced a full participation in all aspects of
family functions, particularly in the nurturing and raising of
their children."
"Changes
to the divorce law have rarely kept pace with changing attitudes
and,
despite the gender neutral language of the
Divorce Act, its actual implementation in the areas of child
custody and child support has continued to be marked by an
entrenched systemic gender bias that `mother knows best and
father pays best.' The administration of justice does not treat
spouses equally when it comes to assigning child custody. By and
large, custody is almost always assigned to mothers and the most
fathers can hope for is a generous access order. Where fathers
interfere with custody orders they will ordinarily bear the full
weight of the law while mothers who flaunt access orders will,
by and large, receive judicial admonitions with usually little
other consequence.
Section 16(10) of the Divorce Act
requires courts to take into consideration the willingness of
the person for whom custody is sought to facilitate contact of
the child with each spouse. Practicing family law lawyers know
that
this Section is almost never
invoked."
2007-09-30
Fathers don't need adoption notice:
Judge Daphne Smith WRONG!!
"A B.C. Supreme Court judge has overturned an earlier ruling that was
holding up the adoption of a child
because the father wasn't told of
the birth. In the earlier
ruling,
Master Ian Caldwell had refused
to finalize the adoption to parents
chosen by the mother through a
private agency
because
notice of the proposed adoption
hadn't been provided to the birth
father. .. The birth mother was not
in a relationship with the father
and did not inform him of the
pregnancy, nor did she name him on
the birth certificate. ...
Caldwell ruled the father's notice
of the adoption was necessary under
the
Adoption Act
"unless the circumstances justify
dispensing with notice." "A
simple assertion by the birth mother
that the birth father is unaware of
the pregnancy and birth and that she
chooses not to name him is not
sufficient," he ruled. ..
But
Madam Justice Daphne Smith overturned Caldwell's decision, ...
She ruled the Act's provision for giving notice to birth fathers of an
adoption only applies when the father has acknowledged paternity or is
acknowledged
by the birth mother as the father and registered on the birth
certificate. She also said there is no mechanism
under the Adoption Act to compel a birth mother to name a birth father.
Smith approved the adoption." slazaruk@png.canwest.com
Trociuk
v. British Columbia (Attorney
General), [2003] 1 S.C.R. 835
has already shown this practice in
BC's registration of Birth
Certificate to be ILLEGAL.
Madame "JUSTICE" Daphne Smith is
in this overturning
Master Ian Caldwell's
application of the WRITTEN
Statute is is a CRIMINAL ACT under
the Criminal Code of Canada, and she
should be Prosecuted.
"The
topic assigned to me this morning is
"Paradigm Shifts in Law and Changing
Philosophical Perspectives."
This assignment requires a study of
how the gigantic strides in other fields of human knowledge have
affected and continue to affect law in general and judicial doctrines in
particular....
"Let
me begin with
the well-known caveat that,
traditionally. laws and judicial
decisions are territorial in scope
and are binding only within the
country of the issuing authority.
This concept flows from the
centuries-old view that sovereignty
is absolute within a state's
boundary.However. the advances of
science, the cross-pollination of
technology, and the realities of our
ever-shrinking world have gradually
assaulted this doctrine.
A
new paradigm has emerged. demanding
the universalization of laws and of
the judicial rulings interpreting
them....
<Who's demanding this
universalization? The Judges
only!!!?>
"Verily.
issues concerning diverse subjects like
international trade. banking, intellectual property, immigration, human
rights. human dignity and criminal law enforcement have built up a
burgeoning literature on the subject of
judicial globalization. One of
the leading academics in this field.
Professor Anne-Marie Slaughter of
Harvard Law School, says that
modern judges should "see one
another not only as servants or even representatives of it particular
government or party, but as fellow professionals in a profession that
transcends national borders.
...
<TREASON!!!!!>
Judicial globalization, sometimes referred to as
''World
Constitutionalism"
or more simply as
"international judicial cooperation".
is
necessitated by the basic similarities of issues facing many courts all
over the world at present."
Larrt
Pratt -- Betrayed by the Bench, "In Betrayed by the
Bench,
Stormer traces the lawlessness of so many of today’s rulings to
the revolt against the
Common Law.. The revolt was led from the Harvard Law School
by professors such as its Dean, Roscoe Pound. The replacement
was the
tyranny of case law. .. The case law preferred
by Pound and his followers allowed them to slip out from under
the constraints
of the timeless and universal precepts foundational to the
Common Law.
Case law
<claim the Judges> allows judges to “make law.”
....
The record of Canadian Judges is already VERY clear
on their intent to overthrow Parliament and the Legislatures as
Canadian Law Makers. We can easily project what they will do
in International Courts. when our National Sovereignty is in conflict
with Economic Globalization. To accommodate Judicial Activism on
matters of National Sovereignty is IDIOTIC!
Molech
worship is the practice of sacrificing your children to the
burning god. Consider the significance of
Molech Worship by National Politicians when the stated
objective
of some of
them
are to reduce
the world population to 500 million. Alex also
documents the homosexual practices in the
Skull & Bones. This is
pretty
run-of-the-mill Satanic worship, which may extend to rape and
murder of the Coven's children, Foster Children or Run Aways.
.See also
Exposing the illuminati from Within, Bill
Schnoebelen;
Recall
that
according
to
Alistair Crowley the Occult
worshipper is promised
increased Lifespan
or Immortality for tantric anal sex with children and for Murder
. This is a powerful Motive for the planned depopulation of
Planet Earth..
"This
is one of those moments when you want to grab liberals
by the lapels and demand, "Well, what did you expect?"
... A group called the National Center for Men has filed
a lawsuit they are calling "Roe v. Wade for Men."
... More than three decades ago Roe vs. Wade
gave women control of their reproductive lives but
nothing in the law changed for men. Women can now have
sexual intimacy without sacrificing reproductive choice.
Women now have the freedom and security to enjoy
lovemaking without the fear of forced procreation. Women
now have control of their lives after an unplanned
conception. But men are routinely forced to give up
control, forced to be financially responsible for
choices only women are permitted to make, forced to
relinquish reproductive choice as the price of
intimacy."
COMMENT:
Roe V. Wade was a "Femi-Narcissistic" decision, looking
after the interests of the Mother only. The
principal established there established was extrapolated
into a Mother's "murder rights" expressed in minimal
sentences when murdering their children. Equal
Parenting eliminates much of this.
Father dealt difficult hand by the system
"Even last week, when the family
court file of
Elaine and Leo Campione was released to the
press -- in significant measure because Mr. Campione
didn't oppose the media's bid to see it ..
There is, to be frank, an underlying perspective of
feminist oppression from which all else springs.
.. Women are seen first as victims --
generally of male power and particularly of husband
power -- and presumed to be truth-tellers and good
mothers until proven otherwise. The starting point
for men is that they are abusers and deadbeat dads
in the making unless they can prove the contrary,
and if it takes years for them to demonstrate that,
oh well."
"Children of single
parents were at higher risk of physical abuse and of all
types of neglect and were overrepresented among
seriously injured, moderately injured, and endangered
children. Compared with their counterparts living with
both parents, children in single parent families had:
a 77% greater
risk of being harmed by physical abuse (using the
stringent Harm Standard) and a 63% greater risk of
experiencing any countable physical abuse (using the
Endangerment Standard);
an 87% greater
risk of being harmed by physical neglect and a 165%
greater risk of experiencing any countable physical
neglect;
a 74% greater
risk of being harmed by emotional neglect and a 64%
greater risk of experiencing any countable emotional
neglect;
a 220% (or more
than three times) greater risk of being
educationally neglected;
an
approximately 80% greater risk of suffering serious
injury or harm from abuse or neglect;
an
approximately 90% greater risk of receiving moderate
injury or harm as a result of child maltreatment;
and
a 120% (or more
than two times) greater risk of being endangered by
some type of child abuse or neglect."
Children who grow up without both parents in their lives are
more prone to a whole host of social problems.
According to a three-year study done by
Edward Kruk, an associate professor of social work at the
University of British Columbia, 85% of young people in prison
and youth detention are fatherless. This is a particularly
important finding since, according to Statistics Canada, youth
crime is the only category of crime that has been consistently
increasing over the past decade. Nearly one-in-five young
Canadians will have a run-in with the law — more than twice the
percentage of adults — and most of them have no father in the
home.
A combination of his own research and the findings of dozens of
long-term studies of the effects of divorce on children,
Professor Kruk’s study explains that 90% of runaways, as well as
71% of dropouts and majorities of depressed, suicidal, addicted
and pregnant teens, grew up in father-absent homes. ...
father absence is the result of divorce, and, increasingly, of
our legal system’s deliberate bias in favour of mothers and
against fathers in custody awards.
Nearly 80% of custody awards in Canadian courts are made to
mothers, and visitation rights are almost never enforced with
the same enthusiasm as child support awards. Public officials
are quick to condemn so-called deadbeat dads, passing laws to
suspend their driver’s licenses and government cheques if they
are behind on their payments to their exes. Yet mothers who deny
visitation are almost never punished. No province, in practice,
has penalties for access denial that match those for falling
behind on support. ...
Re: Rights of
the Father and what happens in between
with the Children?
I am aware of a
Recipient of child support, (for
children who are being alienated to
the extreme by that Recipient), who has
lied about finances and more, under oath
before a supreme court judge.
"Opponents of same sex-marriage claimed a major victory
yesterday after a respected constitutional expert issued
the legal opinion that Parliament could define marriage
as a union between a man and a woman without
contravening the Supreme Court's comments on the issue.
According to Eugene Meehan, a former national president
of the Canadian Bar Association and former executive
legal officer of the Supreme Court, Canada's highest
court has not required Parliament to amend the
Traditional definition, nor has gay marriage received
protection under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms."
Comment:
Go to
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Why
the discrepancy between the SCC Judges' claims,
emphasized vociferously by the Liberals in the last
election, and the Statute? We suggest the problem
is the prevalence of Career Activists -
"New Priests" they call themselves -
purposefully positioning themselves in our Judiciaries
to subvert the powers of the Canadian Electorate and
their elected members of Parliament. In truth the
Charter in TWO places (Section 15.1
Equality Rights and again in Section 28:
General.), the Courts are by Statute of Parliament
and the Legislatures, instructed they MAY NOT
DISCRIMINATE BASED ON GENDER - an every day occurrence
in Family Courts. If Overturnings of Provincial
Court rulings by the Supreme Court of Canada are a
measure of legitimacy or competence, the BC Courts have
the worst record of any Province in the country.
Based on five-year averages, BC, with roughly 14% of the
national population, represents about 35% of the
Canadian Supreme Court Overturnings of Provincial Court
rulings.
Stay up to date on Bill C-38:
Click here for Bill C-38's current status
A special committee has been formed to conduct an
in-depth study on Bill C-38. Contact information for the
members of this committee can be found [here]
This TV docudrama highlights the inadequacies
of Inheritance Statutes to protect Grandparents and Natural
Children from theft by a Newcomer Spouse. The only remedy
for Natural Children against the "Black Widow" and "Grey Widow"
strategies is more Court Time, and that with only an abysmal
prognosis in outcome. Again, Judges do not consider
themselves bound by Statute, and the Statutes that exist were
typically written when a Surviving Spouse and a Natural Parent
were one and the same person, hardly the case today.
The current probability of divorce at five years duration is 65%
in new first marriages, and increases with duration.
Second and third marriages are even worse. Instead
of deterring the Newcomer Spouse from making spurious claims
upon Family Assets at Death and Divorce, BC Judges are now
waiving completely the time constraints for a "Long Marriage",
the duration of marriage necessary before Assets are divided
50/50. The explanation offered is that that the present
rapidity of Divorce following Marriage justifies giving a
Newcomer Spouse upon marriage an INSTANT 50% interest in the
Family Assets accrued by the Natural Parents and Grandparents.
Like the writers of
"WIDOW ON THE HILL" we consider this a profound insult
to the Grandparents and the Deceased Natural Parent whose work
and savings created the Family Assets for the Benefit of their
progeny (family). This is a strong deterrent against
saving for the financial security for your family and your
children's future and harmful to families. We believe the
Newcomer's absconding with the Family Assets with the
complacency of the Courts is tantamount to Grave-Robbing.
Less recognized is that the Natural Children
of the deceased Natural Parents, cannot contest the Claim of the
Newcomer Spouse on Family Assets unless they remain a part of
the Estate, and assets are no longer a part of the Estate once
once they have been "commingled" with the Newcomer Spouse in
marriage. On Marriage, the first half-interest transfers
immediately to the Newcomer Spouse. The remaining
half-interest transfers immediately to the Newcomer Spouse
upon the death of the remaining Natural Parent!
Consequently, ALL FAMILY ASSETS, more than likely, will be
handed over the Newcomer Spouse, disinheriting utterly the
Natural Children. We, like author
Stephen Harrigan,
find this deplorable.
Ontario Court of
Appeal from the mid 1990’s to the mid 2000’s. Records from 7 judges are compared
for over 140 family law cases. ...
It can be concluded
a man had a 96.4 % chance of losing on all issues, but a
woman had a 92.9 % chance of winning on at least some issues when appearing
before
Justice
Rosalie Abella .."
Thanks, Peter See Judicial Activism
is Breach of Trust; Breach of Trust;
Abella Rosalia
FYI, Probability of an Event
in a year, P = 1/ Expected Years to 1st occurrence, T. Hence
Time, T = 1/Probability, P. Probability of Successive
events in a conjectured Path of Development must be MULTIPLIED
as
Joint Probabilities, ~ Time required for Development Path ~
1/(P1 x P2 x P3 x...Pverybignumber). Periods of time required
for even a short and simple Path of Development rapidly
approaches infinity, and therefore the Event approaches an
impossibility even for very simple Organisms. The problem of impossibility
increases exponentially with each increase of
complexity
in a Development Path. This is the inevitable conclusion
even without the necessary incorporation that natural processes
INCREASE Disorder rather than decrease it. Increases of
Order simply do not occur spontaneously out of natural
processes. In fact, only the opposite - that
of chronic decay and Disorder - is ever actually observed
scientifically, probably a direct consequence that the Universe
is expanding.. It is very clear that
a Belief that each example of Order witnessed in an Organism has
increased spontaneously by natural
processes is thoroughly and completely irrational. Such a
Belief in
Spontaneous Generation can only be taken in the
rigidly dogmatic blind Faith Richard
Dawkins exemplifies. BTW,
Hubble's discovery of the Red Shift of Starlight is pretty strong evidence that the Universe is expanding,
that we are pretty much at the center of
the
expanding
Universe,
and that time passes very slowly here at the Universe's Center
of Mass relative to the edge. That is, Time
passes most speedily near the expanding edge of the Universe, and the
rate of Time decreases continuously as you look backwards
through it's trajectory towards the Center of the Universe
someplace near here. Hence Starlight from stars at the
expanding edge of the Universe can appear to be zillions of
years old from our perspective here at the Center, and the stars
themselves can in fact be zillions of light years away and
rising.
BTW, if you want to know why
starlight form distant stars can be billions of years old while
our Solar System can be by astronomical standards extremely
young, see
FunStuff: Einstein Gravity and the Expanding Universe
Did you know a Courtroom Transcript can't be released
until the Judge has doctored and authorized it?
Here's a case where the Transcript completely
disappeared!
NOTE: BC Judges now will not tolerate recording devices
in our Courtrooms, and have adopted the policy that
Court Recorders may not make their unadulterated
Transcript available to the public. Instead
Transcribers are required to submit their Transcripts to
the Judge for editing and amend it as the Judge
instructs them. Only when the Judge has approved
the amended version, may the Transcriber release the
Transcript of what went on in our Courtroom. We
see this as extraordinarily meddlesome and self-serving
policy of incompetent and Activist Judges which, we
suppose, has become the norm . If these
Judges had any integrity, they would not be concerned
about recording devices or the independence of the
Court
Transcriber. We have grown accustomed to many "Justices"
and other Public Servants doctoring government records
to legitimize their atrocities against BC children &
families. This is true even across sister
Ministries. For example one Ministry's Public
Servants are known to routinely falsify their records to
corroborate the report of another Public Servant in a
sister Ministry. The personnel in the
"self-regulation" Office of Ministry 0f Children and
Families (which theoretically scrutinizes the
Ministry's Social Workers) seem to use their tax
dollars not to protect the public, but to protect and
excuse their fellow Social Workers and accumulate more
false accusations of the Victims. The Minister has
recognized this problem, but has been by frustrated by
his Offices' inability to overcome the intransigence of
the Social Workers and their solidarity in their abuse
of innocent British Columbian children and families.
It has been suggested that this is in part the work of
CUPE solidarity.
Editor, Langley Times: I sincerely hope that all the single
fathers had a very happy Father’s Day. Only by luck did my son
get to see his son on Father’s Day.
My son went from being a fulltime dad to being a babysitter on
weekends. I guess this is what the courts expect now when a
relationship
fails... If his ex did not need a babysitter, he would not
get to see his son at all and the calls to try to get him would
continue. These types of situations are not just hard on
the child, but on the dad and grandparents. Will these
children be insecure, wondering where daddy went, where nana and
papa went?
The courts seem to be lax in the way they
handle things. There is so much red tape to go through before
you can even get a trial and let the truth come out. My
son was willing to do
50/50 parenting,
which should be mandatory in the court. He is a stay-at-home dad
who works from home. What can be any better than being with your
parent, rather than a babysitter?
I urge all single fathers to take a stand.
Some of mothers are getting away with not what’s in the best
interest of the child, but what’s in it for themselves.,
Linda T, Langley;
How long will it be before Canada follows
the EU's lead in
denying unemployed
women social benefits when they refuse to take paid work
in Prostitution?
2007-09-26
Saving families, David Warren,
"There are few areas of government
policy ... where the government
could not improve things for
everyone by withdrawing most
existing government programs.
... there is the family,
which meant, until the day before
yesterday, a father, a mother, their
children... There was a
time, in Canada as throughout the
West, when it was unthinkable for
governments at any level to tamper
with family life, except in the most
extreme circumstances. Rather than
try to
"redefine" it, the state
conceived its role as defending the
existing,
NATURAL
FAMILY against the
depredations of its natural enemies,
and securing it as the foundation of
social order. ...
Those days are gone, and for several
generations now.., the Nanny State
has been presenting itself instead
as
everybody's ultimate mummy and
daddy, ... The adult citizen was
treated more and more as a child,
incapable of making decisions
autonomously. ... now
the government presents itself as
the champion of various
"alternative" ways to raise
children. In doing so, it has taken
upon itself the function of what
Josef Stalin called "the engineer of
human souls," forging some
post-modern variant of the "new
socialist man"
2006-08-26
It is Time to Eliminate Status of Women;
"Feminists who claim to speak for me irritate me. When they
use taxpayer money to do it, it sends me through the roof.
Status of Women is a government agency that does
precisely that. The agency's name is somewhat of a misnomer,
it should be called the Radical Feminist agency, because
that's exactly what it is."
"I
would just like to bring to your attention a petition I am
addressing to Minister Flaherty to de-fund Status of Women
Canada:
Eliminate Funding for Status of Women Please pass
it on to your contacts. God Bless, Suzanne."
Thanks,
Suzanne. NOTE to Parents: If you have
anything to loose in Family Court, we recommend you DO NOT give
the
Enemy your personal information, as happens when you sign these
online Petitions. We find your political views are
commonly used in Family Court as evidence to justify
taking your children away.
Yes, actually, and more likely than not.....
Seventy-something percent of Canadian
Adoptions are now given to
homosexual pairs.
Natural Parents
not wishing homosexual to become the Legal Parent
of their children are ignored and maligned. Removal of
children from their Natural Parents under false pretences and
False Accusations for
placement into Foster Homes and Adoption Agencies is common.
Natural Fathers in particular are especially powerless to
prevent removal of their children and adopted out. Hence
the demand for an Adoption
Veto for Dads.
Do not be deceived! These malicious
"Public Servants" are typically NOT operating under "The
Law" as they falsely claim, but will LIE LIE LIE to serve and
protect their own predacious kindred you find everywhere in the
Public Services.
2004-07-01 Could your kids be
given to 'gay' parents?
Recall.... A Homosexual is
FORTY TIMES more likely to be a
pedophile than a member of the
the population at large.
(Reference statistics on
convicted Pedophiles.)
"In the
debate over gay marriage,
strikingly little attention has
been paid to the impact on
children. Some question the
wisdom of having children raised
by two homosexuals, but the best
they can seem to argue is that
serious flaws vitiate the
literature defending it.
... Almost no
attention has been
devoted to what may be the
more serious political question of
who will supply the children of
gay "parents,"
since obviously they cannot
produce children
themselves. A few
will come from sperm donors
and surrogate mothers, but very
few.
The
vast majority will come, because
they already do come, from
pre-existing heterosexual
families.
In Massachusetts,
"Forty
percent of the children adopted
have
gone to gay
and
lesbian families,"according to
Democratic
state Sen. Therese Murphy.
At
Age of Consent, FOURTEEN,
Mommy's new Lesbian Lover can be
having sex
with
Jonathan England's three girls,
and
there's
nothing he can do about it.
2005-03-31 Canadian Children
Unwillingly Forced to Return to
Britain to Lesbian Mother and
Partner; How many
Lawyers & Judges are homosexual?
Good question! Lawyers
consistently tell us it' forty
something percent!!!!
Femicentric Parenting, the Status Quo in British Columbia
There little doubt that in new
marriages,.it is thefemicentric IN-EQUALITY of parents that imposes an
inherent risk and instability into every marital bond in this Province. Surely,
this instability alone PRECIPITATES marital breakdown and divorce
in many cases. There is no question that many divorces would never happen if Equal Parenting
Agreements were in effect prior to conception. The best time to make
an Equal Parenting Agreement is probably before marriage. If you do nothing, the
system is rigged to bust up your family, and to send men in particular
into the poorhouse. Every member of your family looses.
Stats Canada has reported that the AVERAGE age of the
YOUNGEST
child when the divorce is filed has now dropped below THREE years old. What were these women thinking of when
they decided to become pregnant? Why wouldn't they end the marriage
before bringing these children into a family they were on the cusp of
tearing apart?
In
British Columbia, 91% of the filings are by the mothers. Not surprising,
since
mothers have historically had a 92% probability of getting sole custody if they
want it, and all the "benefits" that brings. This is a
deception of the Industry. By pitting the mothers against the fathers in
the BC Family Courts, the
Family Law industry provides itself with a bountiful steady unearned income. The women of
divorce get just a tiny fraction of the "winnings" extorted from the men,
forever enslaved to these perps.
Because so many divorced women had driven their ex-husbands
broke and were themselves going onto welfare and overloading the women's
shelters and becoming a burden on the Taxpayer, the Provincial NDP Party
extended a divorced woman's financial claims beyond the children's natural
fathers to any man she could develop a sexual relationship with. Prior to this
change, the new man in her life would have to adopt the children after marriage
to become financially responsible for them.
The NDP made things even worse by encouraging women to get
into relationships with men knowing they can end the the relationship at any
time, and prosecute for money any man foolish enough to get involved with them.
The deception of being a "Victim" has been very effective
in driving fathers, who might have revealed the deception, out of their
children's lives..
See Anne
Cools on False Accusations
Quite apart from the catastrophic consequences
to BC Families these FALSE VICTIMS create, their deception have made many
question the REAL LEGITIMATE CLAIMS of REAL VICTIMS.
It is always very difficult enough for REAL VICTIMS of
abuse to expose the REAL PERPETRATORS. It seemed overly convenient that
so quickly after the horrors of real victims of abuse finally started being heard than so many women got on the
Victim bandwagon that the FALSE MEMORY SYNDROME defense was developed.
This gave the real perpetrators, often in the "care-giving" businesses
themselves, enough of a distraction to make a clean getaway. Some of them
were making money at the same time. This is an
unbelievable cruelty to the real victims, and perpetrated by other women,
masquerading as "Victims".
The Presumption of Sole Custody except by Consent of
the mother is of course in contravention of the
Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedom (Section 15.1 & Section 28).
The Presumption of Sole Custody except by Consent of
the mother is a flagrant disregard for the children's' needs for
both parents, and the legal battles it creates moves incredible wealth from British Columbian families
to British Columbian lawyers and other BC Family Law professionals .
"This
is one of those moments when you want to grab liberals by the lapels and
demand, "Well, what did you expect?" ... A group called the National
Center for Men has filed a lawsuit they are calling "Roe v. Wade
for Men." ... More than three decades ago Roe
vs. Wade gave women control of their reproductive lives but nothing in
the law changed for men. Women can now have sexual intimacy without
sacrificing reproductive choice. Women now have the freedom and security
to enjoy lovemaking without the fear of forced procreation. Women now
have control of their lives after an unplanned conception. But men are
routinely forced to give up control, forced to be financially
responsible for choices only women are permitted to make, forced to
relinquish reproductive choice as the price of intimacy."
COMMENT: Roe V. Wade was a "Femi-Narcissistic" decision, looking
after the interests of the Mother only. The principal
established there established was extrapolated into a
Mother's "murder rights" expressed in minimal sentences when
murdering their children. Equal Parenting eliminates
much of this.
Suing Judges - Judicial Immunity:
"In the following
cases, courts have found that the judges acted outside of their
judicial capacity and were not entitled to immunity...."
"There is no system ever
devised by mankind that is guaranteed to rip husband and wife or
father, mother and child apart so bitterly than our present
Family Court System." Judge Brian Lindsay,
Retired Supreme Court Judge, New York, New York
"There is something bad happening to our children in
FAMILY
COURTS today that is causing them more harm than drugs, more
harm than crime and even more harm than child molestation."
Judge Watson L. White Superior Court Judge, Cobb
County, Georgia .....
40%
is the minimum Fee they will usually demand, and would go for
everything,
but the Law Societies name the upper limit at 60% which some
firms recognize.
"Though many therapists and law enforcement persons are aware of
organized sexual abuse of children in BC, this is the first book
that attempts to document the extensiveness of the abuse and the
breadth of the corruption in our province."
-
Garry Flint, Ph.D., Registered Psychologist.
lobbying
other Canadian Judges to build
with her
an International Cabal of
Globalist Judges by
which to dominate Parliaments,
usurping
their powers of
law
making, delegated IN TRUST to PARLIAMENT
by the Crown.
We APPEAL to her Majesty
Queen Elizabeth II to inquire into "Justice"
Beverly McLachlin's conduct
in exercising her Duties in Canadian Courts. We request her
Majesty make what enquiries are necessary to determine the extent of
McLachlin's wrongdoings, and advise, if she would be so kind, our Prime
Minister of her findings and wishes.
This interview outlines his discovery that some of the largest
Tax Exempt Foundations
are Fabian
Socialists having among their objectives the
assimilation of the West "comfortably merged with
the
Soviet Union" into a single Socialist block.
In preparation for this assimilation, these same
Tax
Exempt Foundations, including the
Rockefeller Foundation are indoctrinating our youngsters
with their tyrannical Socialist perspectives.
Join
the Meetup of
Leave a Message: at
info@equalparenting-bc.ca
with your phone number
and we will try to call you to get you into a Group near you.
Be on the lookout for the
"Parent's Rights"
IMPOSTER. Insist on "Natural Parents' Rights" only
Recall, Natural Grandparents ARE Natural Parents,
and in the absence of a Natural Parent, we say
a Natural Grandparent may stand as one of the two
Equal
Parents
Spouses welcome at "Open Meetings", but NCPs only at
"Closed
Meetings", please.
"Without Cause or Consent,
no Child shall be
removed from a Natural Parent!!!
"Two Equal Parents may ..
agree to unequal Parenting Time, but this does NOT impugn the Parental
Authority of either Natural Parent relative to Third Party
Interlopers.
1.
The Bottom Layer: The Initial Equal Parenting Agreement
Initial Equal Parenting Agreement creating full time, all time
equality of both natural parents, subordinate to no third parties (a
Constitutional right ignored by most Family Courts); a series of
tentative
Parenting Timetables for each year and statement of intent, or
"Wishes"; the requirement that the tentative Parenting Timetable laid
out there will be reviewed and finalized annually and incorporated into
the
Annual Parenting Supplement. Parental authority and discretion
is always equal and unaffected by inequalities of Parenting Time
allocations.
2.
Middle Layer: The Annual Supplement
& its
Parenting Timetable
3.
Top Layer: Autonomy of Both Equal Parents on all matters not
previously Constrained.
Parenting Timetable alternates all residual parenting questions
between the two otherwise equal parents who are subordinate to no third
parties. Full autonomy of each parent during their Parenting Time
as allotted in the agreed Parenting Timetable on all residual parenting
questions not previously constrained by Covenants in the initial Equal
Parenting Agreement, or the current Annual Parenting Supplement.
Full discretion on residual parenting with the Timetabled Parent, but
flexibility encouraged and provided by Ad Hoc Agreements.
It has been suggested that,
Roe V Wade (1973) is the first example of
Judicial Activism in
the West. Like Canadian Judicial Activists have done since
the Canadian Charter was created in 1982, the US Court in
Roe V Wade (1973) claimed the right to Rule against the
Legislative Houses the grounds of their Statues being
"un-Constitutional". This is the premise that the Legislatures
must work within the confines set by it's own Contract with it's
people, the US Constitution. Agreed. What made
Roe V Wade (1973) different was that a majority of the
Judges used powers granted them by Statute to enforce
WRITTEN bounds on
legislation to enforce the
JUDGE'S PERSONAL VIEWS
which they claimed to be operative though absent in the
written text of the US Constitution. Neither could these
newly "activist" Judges
demonstrate their Decision was in keeping with the practice of
previous Courts.
In the
Roe V Wade (1973) example, Justice
White noted the US Judiciary's hijacking of Legislative powers in his Dissenting Opinion,
"I
find nothing in the language or history of the Constitution to
support the Court's judgment. The Court simply fashions
and announces a new constitutional right for
pregnant mothers and, with scarcely any reason or authority for
its action, invests that right with
sufficient substance to override most
existing state abortion statutes."
Roe
V Wade is possibly the first example of the
Judicial Mysticism we in Canada have seen with increasing
frequency since 1982 in the
Courts of
"Femi-Nazi"
Beverley Mclachlin. Mclachlin in
defending her policy of Judicial Activism refers to a "higher
power" to which Judges may refer when they are at odds with the
Statutes of the legislative bodies.
It is an interesting fact that a
philosophical basis for Judicial Activism and Abortion Activism
isn't hard to find. One of the original
Femi-NazisMargaret Sanger, the founder of
Planned Parenthood and
Adolf Hitler were both Believers in
Eugenics (directed Human Evolution) and shared many religious views, including the notion of a "Master Race"
(or is that Master Class, Beverly?).
More than likely both
Sanger &
Hitler would have subscribed to
Haeckel's,
Theory of "Phylogenic Recapitulation" , 1866,
(complete rubbish) to make their
objectives less repugnant to
the misguided observer. Haeckel's idea was that the
Evolutionary Path of embryo's Phylogeny (species) is
"Recapitulated" from fertilization to birth by moving through
a series of less evolved Species to increasingly more evolved
forms until birth. Haeckel's farcical drawings have been
widely distributed. You've no doubt seen them in your
schoolbooks.
Since at least
Gregor Mendel (1822 - 1884) we have
known each Species has a specified
Genetic Number - the number of genes in the haploid
cells (gametes)
provided by each parent, male and female. During
Fertilization these genes pair up, male genes to female genes,
and when all are paired, the newly
diploid cell can begin it's first division into
body
cells. Barring a debilitating injury to the genetic
information,
genetic Number is a constant throughout a Species' lifespan,
including it's embryology.
The constancy of a
Specie's genetic number precludes
"Phylogenic Recapitulation". Consider also the
extraordinary variation of Genetic Number which is supposedly
"recapitulated" This is so huge a topic it would
take
pages and pages to itemize, nevertheless a few samples
follow in ascending
Chromosomal Number..
Family Canidae
(Dogs & Foxes) 39 pairs, 78 Chromosomes, Dog 17 pairs, 34 Chromosomes, Fox
It is impossible for any of these to be
"blood relatives" because their dissimilar
chromosomal numbers forever bar
them from having offspring together. They are similarly
barred from having a common ancestor. Set aside for the sake of argument, the
humanity of a human fetus. Forget the legal contrivance to
exonerate medical practitioners of criminal charges by deeming unborn children "Non-Persons"
until they have survived birth.
In
Canada the WRITTEN Charter Rights twice precludes discrimination
between Male and Female Parents. It is our contention that
Fathers already have the Statutory Right to equal participation in the care and fate of a
"fetus", whether you regard the unborn child as Person, Property,
or something in between.
The Natural Fathers' Consent must
therefore be obtained before the destruction of any unborn child
who is sadly unwanted by their Mother. Both Natural
Parents must be
participant in any parenting decision. Abortion is not just a
"Woman's issue" it is a Natural Parent's Issue.
The Abortion Veto
for Dads is a humane, gender neutral and
Constitutionally
required alternative to the 'Planned Parenthood" approach.
"The most
merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant
members is to kill it.",
Margaret Sanger,
Women
and
the New Race (Eugenics Publ. Co., 1920, 1923)
On blacks, immigrants and
indigents: "...human weeds,' 'reckless breeders,'
'spawning... human beings who never should have been born." Margaret
Sanger,
Pivot
of Civilization, referring to
immigrants and poor people
On sterilization & racial
purification: Sanger believed that, for the purpose of racial
"purification," couples should be rewarded who chose
sterilization. Birth Control in America, The Career of
Margaret Sanger,
by
David Kennedy, p. 117, quoting a 1923 Sanger speech.
On the right of married couples
to bear children: Couples should be required to submit
applications to have a child, she wrote in her
"Plan
for Peace." Birth Control Review, April 1932
On the purpose of birth
control: The purpose in promoting birth control was "to
create a race of
thoroughbreds,"
she wrote in the Birth Control Review, Nov. 1921 (p. 2)
See
Eugenics
On the rights of the
handicapped and mentally ill, and racial minorities: "More
children
from
the fit, less from the unfit -- that is the chief aim of birth
control." Birth Control Review, May 1919, p. 12
The Public Service corporately is charged
with the Administration of various Acts of Parliament. The
Courts themselves are of course members of the Public Service
whose powers and responsibilities are also a Creation of an Act
of Parliament. However, as
Feminist / Homosexualist Activists displace Parliament in
establishing Policy by which a Ministry is
regulated,
we the objects of their actions have been subjected to a
"Bureaucratic Tyranny". These purport to have the
legitimacy of Parliamentary Statute, but more often than not,
they have never read the Act they purport to administer, and
instead execute the ideologies of their Women's Studies
professors and the
Four Missions.
Violence and Homosexuality;
"The top six U.S.
male serial killers were all gay < as are 40-something % of Canadian Law Faculties, Law Societies,
and the Judiciary, "common knowledge" among lawyers>:
Juan Corona was convicted of murdering 25 migrant
workers (he "made love" with their corpses).
"Lesbian
Aileen Wuornos laid claim in 1992 to "worst female killer"
with at least 7 middle-aged male victims. She singlehandedly
topped the lesbian nurse team of Catherine Wood and Gwen Graham,
who had killed 6 convalescent patients in Grand Rapids,
Michigan. The association between serial murder and
homosexuality isn’t recent..... "
"...
the Courts have virtually turned the Law upside down,
contrary to the express intention of Parliament..."
Solicitor
writes British Courts have high-jacked the legislative
process in Britain. We see this clearly also in Canada,
calling this Judicial
Activism. Judicial Activism is Treason, and
Criminal Breach of Trust, but
Canada has no
Although ruled a violation of a father's Charter Rights in
the SCC Trociuk
decision, the BC Legislature continues to allow the BC
Birth Register to invite mothers to "unacknowledge" fathers as
they register Births. From the "Unacknowledged Father"
flows all kinds of Femi-Nazi Evil.
If you take action against a
Civil Servant many of them respond by manufacturing a
Malicious Prosecution
against you.
BC Ministry of Children & Families is a well oiled machine
when it comes to Malicious Prosecution. Social
Workers, Schools & other Government workers routinely
manufacture cases against Fathers, falsify records, and
otherwise
Obstruct Justice but the RCMP (more Government
workers, and under direct instruction of the Judges) are loathed
to investigate
these crimes against Parents & Children. This can also be
true for Mothers. There is a strong trend generally in
Canada to make all children wards of the State by default, and
to separate them from their Natural Parents. Please
research Cotler & the elimination of the term "Natural Parent"
from the legislation, and send us your links.
As a Parent, you would expect to have free access to
Records on your Minor Child in various government offices.
Not so. In practice, you will generally find a Civil Servant will
refuse you the Records they have compiled. They will require you
to ask your Minor Child to sign a Release Form before they will give you
access to your Child's Records. Message to the Child?
"Your supervising Civil Servant is the your Protector against your
Parents. You can trust your Government Worker of course, but for
your own safety, we ask you, "Can you really trust your Parents?'"
Our position of course, is that unless a Natural Parent has committed
some offense by which they become unavailable for physical custody of
their Natural Children, Natural Parents must be presumed fit for
physical custody their own Natural Children. Statutes in Family
Law should be essentially silent on Tests a Natural Parents must pass to
qualify as the Natural Child's custodian. Statutes outside of Family Law
are sufficient to test persons - be they Teachers, Day Care Workers,
Social Workers, Foster Parents or Natural Parents - who are to be
constrained from physical custody of a Child. In the absence of
evidence or agreement to the contrary, we maintain there is no
better person to personally care or bond with a Child than
BOTH NATURAL PARENTS and GRANDPARENTS.
canadian privacy act - Google Search
The
Parens Patriae doctrine was adopted to obligate the State to
care for orphans and for children whose parents are indisposed.
Now the Family Courts have extended the doctrine to displace
Natural Parents WITHOUT cause.
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.
Fathers'
rights activist
Comment:
Go to
Business is UP! Thanks to Immigration Canada's Quotas &
Enticements for Foreign Women to enter Canada's Sex Slave Trade
