Judicial Activism is Breach of Trust

1215:  MAGNA CARTA, JUNE 15TH
Issues Summaries
Abortion Veto for Dads
Adoption Veto for Dads
Adopted Children Disallowed NPs
Affirmative Action
Age Of Consent
Anti-Depressants, Drug Induced Suicide
Battered Woman Syndrome
BC Vital Statistics Act Misandry
BC Legislature MUST
Big Brother, Micro-Management
Bill C-22
Birth Rate Displacement
Best interests of the Child
Breach of Trust
"Case Law" is NOT Law
CCA Wood and Playgrounds
Child Support Tables / SOW Fraud
"Child's Right" or "Parents' Right"
Child Trafficking by Public Officers
Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges
Compulsory Drugging of Children
Corren Agreement
Court Ordered Sexism
Credit Crisis, Currency Replacment
Custody Orders not Enforced
Debtor's Prison Reinstituted
Day Care Universal
Deadbeat Dad Propaganda
Disabled parents
DISS = Divorce Initiated Suicide Synd.
Domestic Violence Propaganda
Division of Assets
Enticement Seduction Tort Claims Precluded
Estate Taxes Thieve a Child's Inheritance
Euthanasia, Spousal
Ex Parte Orders
False Accusations
Father Hatred Propaganda
Fatherlessness, State Imposed
Federal Reserve / Fiat Currency
FEMA Camps, Martial Law
Femi-Narcissism
Feminism = Socialism = Nazism
Fitness Test for Natural Parents in Divorce
Fitness Test for Students: "Transitions"
FMEP = Family Maintenance Enforcement
Forgiveness is NOT Compulsory
Freedom of Speech
Friendly Parent Rule, Max. Contact
Fundamental Justice
Globalism is Treason
Global Warming Fraud "Climategate"
Habeas Corpus Abandoned
"Hate Crime" Speech  Police
Homofacism
Homosexual Violence
Homosexual Activism
Homosexual Marriage
"Human Rights” Commissions in Canada
Human Trafficking
Imputed Income:  Fraudulent CS Orders
Inheritance Theft: Grey & Black Widow
Judicial Activism is Breach of Trust
Judicial Falsification of Court Transcripts
Judicial Freemasonry is Racketeering
Judicial Globalization is Treason
Judicial Interpretation
Judicial Racketeering, Law Societies' Rackets
Kinship Families / Grandparents
Law Societies' Self Regulation, Corruption
Lawyers Lying in Court
Legal Abuse Syndrome
Letters to MP
Letters to MLA
Letters to Editor
Malicious Mother Syndrome
Malicious Prosecution
Misandry = Hatred of Males
Monetary Crisis:  "Money as Debt"
Move Aways
Narcissism
Natiional Sovreignity
Natural Parents Rights Eliminated, SSM
NAU = North American Union
Net Neutrality:  Keep Internet Free!!
No Fault Divorce
NCR = Not Criminally Responsible
Oath Keepers
Parliament MUST
Parental Alienation
Parental Kidnapping
Parenting Time Presumption
Passport & DL Removal
Paternity Denied, Birth Registration
Paternity Fraud, Birth Registration
Pedophiles Fear Dads New
Pedophiles in Public Service
Petitions
Poofy Judges
Predatory Pregnancy
Protestant Revolution, BBC
QE = Quantitative Easing
Sexual Abuse by a Public Officer
Sex Change Surgery
Shadow Government
Sole Custody is Child Abuse
Special Prosecutors for Homo's & Judges
Star Chamber's Secret Overlords
SOW = Status of Women, KILL IT!!!!
Stockholm Syndrome Paradigm Shift
Straw Man Redemption, Free Man
Supremacy of Parliament
Target Legislation
Teachers displacing Parents
Teachers Seducing Students
Tracts and Flyers
Treasonous Public Officers not Prosecuted
Transcripts & Documents altered by Judges
"Women's Shelters" = Lesbian Gulags

Liberal Irwin Cotler: "Natural Parents have NO RIGHTS"

Irwin Cotler, former Liberal "Justice" Minister robbed Canadians of their NATURAL PARENTS' Rights

Irwin Cotler - Google Search;
Irwin Cotler - Google Video

"Natural Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....

"Natural Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"

16.10 Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to conform to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal BREACH OF TRUST"

FYI, the ideas that the State assigns Rights & Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from pre-war Nazi Germany. Under the British system rights are not State-given, but God Given.

Buying into the Court's position that what rights remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same position that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.

More: News: Cotler, Irwin: "Natural Parents have NO RIGHTS...;
News: European Union;
Issues: Paul Watson: Nazi Origins of European Union;;;
Issues: G. Edward Griffin ;
Issues: Fabian Socialism;

Liberal Anne McLellan says "Joint Custody Perpetuates the domination of men over women"

Former Liberal Justice Minister, Deputy Prime Minister

Anne McLellan , MP - Google Search

In "Women and the Process of Constitutional Reform" McLellan warns that <Horrors!> "Provincial Legislatures may impose a presumption of Joint Custody... and perpetuate the domination of men over women"

The Liberal Party and Child Sexual Abuse

More: News: McLellan , Liberal Anne "Joint Custody Perpetuates the domination of men over women"

Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges and Legal Oligarchy

Chapter VII. The English Common Law. Section 57. The Norman Conquest

A beautiy of British Common Law is that it is STATIC, and NOT DYNAMIC as these Activist Judges would have you think.

Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and they will likely tell you it is "Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say "Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these days".

This is completely FALSE. The Judges are Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since 1649, only PARLIAMENT has the Capacity to make Law.

British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was only observed and documented by individuals sent out by the newly Norman Crown after the Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the laws and customs of the various peoples of Britain.. This was done with a view to aggregate existing customs which may vary across the land, into a unified body of Laws. The Authority quoted by the Commoners in their administration of Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the Bible and principles of Danelaw

The process of documentation took only a couple of hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body of Law which was historical, popular, and has served in the intervening centuries as a Benchmark against which Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness". It does NOT change.

More: Issues: Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges and Legal Oligarchy;
Issues: "Judicial Interpretation" to pervert Statutes of Parliament;
Issues: Judicial Activism is Breach of Trust;
Issues: Judicial Globalization is Treason

McKenzie & Pedersen, the "Two Robs",
Equal Parenting Bike Trek US 2006, 2007...

Robb MacKenzie Equal Parenting Bike Trek - Google Search;
Robb MacKenzie Equal Parenting Bike Trek - Google Video

Rob Pederson, Equal Parenting - Google Search;
Robert Pederson, Equal Parenting - Google Video

Cycling4Children.com Equal Parenting Bike Trek's photostream

More: Issues: McKenzie & Pedersen, the "Two Robs", Equal Parenting Bike Trek US 2006, 2007...;
Issues: Smith, Ron: DC Family Preservation Rally, Compulsory Drugging of Children;
Issues: Compulsory Drugging of Children, Thymerisol;

Beware of the "Parental Rights" IMPOSTER!!!!

"Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights"

Be on the lookout for the "Parent's Rights" IMPOSTER. Insist on "Natural Parents Only", please!

It comes as a big surprise to us that many groups that present themselves as "Parents Rights" groups REFUSE to defend the NATURAL PARENT, and and to demand RESTORATION of Natural Parents Rights taken from Canadians in the Homosexual Marriage legislation.

Instead their position to promote the "rights" of a "Parent" in the widest sense of the word, making NO distinction between NATURAL PARENTS and wannaabe Legal Parents. They have bowed to University of Victoria's assertion that the SCC's Trociuk Decision "endorses a Heterosexual View of the Family and must be ignored", legitimizing the ongoing Child Trafficking by the State which views Canadian children as State Property and merchandise for sale in the lucrative Child Adoption Market They refuse to be hampered by prior obligations to that pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can Veto an Adoption.

It appears that many "Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United Nations and Liberal Irwin Cotler's assertion that the Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent has "NO RIGHTS", making the State, not the Natural Parents the Protector of the Child..

Without Cause or Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!

More: About: Beware of the IMPOSTER!!!! "Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights";
News: Lessard, Hester - Heterosexual view of Parenthood must be ignored
News: Smith, Judge Daphne, BCSC, for Child Trafficking;
Issues: Trociuk, Darrell;
Issues: Child Trafficking, Canadian;
Testimonials: Rick Fredrickson of Saskatoon

Bill Graham, Liberal <Pedophile> Leader & Defense Minister

Bill Graham, mp - Google Search;
Bill Graham, mp - Google Video

Lawrence Metherel - Google Search

2007-06-19 Liberal MP Bill Graham announces resignation

"In spite of credible revelations dating back to April 2002 about Bill Graham, a sex addicted bi-sexual sodomizing a 15 year old male prostitute named Lawrence Metherel, Paul Martin allowed Graham to remain Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister - and eventually named him to the portfolio of Minister of Defense.

"On Sept. 28/2005 a vote was held in Parliament to raise the age of consent from 14 (one of the lowest age of consents in the world) to 16 (an age which many still consider too low).

"Bill Graham, Paul Martin, and Anne McLellan, on Sept. 28th, voted against raising the age of consent to 16

More: News: Graham, Bill: Pedophile Parliamentarian, Defense Minister

Canada Court Watch Home

Canada Court Watch Audio

Margaret Somerville, The Case Against “Same-Sex Marriage”

THE CASE AGAINST “SAME-SEX MARRIAGE”, Margaret A. Somerville.pdf

Margaret Somerville, marriage - Google Search;
Margaret Somerville - Google Videos

2010-03-12 When is euthanasia justified?, Margaret Somerville

More: Issues: Somerville, Margaret: “SAME-SEX MARRIAGE”;
Issues: Judicial Activism;
Issues: Poofy Judges

Phyllis Schlafly and Stephen Baskerville

On February 14, 2006 Both Phyllis Schlafly and Stephen Baskerville join together in a landmark interview
"War Against The Family".mp3

Phyllis
Schlafly

"The Family Courts are <generally> a bunch of second rate hangers-on ... build each other's businesses through referrals...Family Law is a <parasitic> self-sustaining Industry"

Stephen
Baskerville

"Why isn't "Focus on the Family" working for Equal Parenting?

Stephen Baskerville's Home; American Coal. for Fathers and Children

Terminology

Habeas Corpus : "literally, "you may have the body". A Habeas Corpus is a legal writ that protects an individual against arbitrary imprisonment by requiring that any person arrested be brought before a court for formal charge. If the charge is considered to be valid, the person must submit to trial; if not, the person goes free. When the law is suspended, then individuals can be imprisoned indefinitely and without charge." .....

More, Glossary of terms

Skeletons in the Closet, 2001

Skeletons in the Closet, a film drawn from the dramatized lives of families living with a protected Pedophile and the mental illness it may create when a loving, faithful, Victim keeps the Secret. This is shockingly common. The Secret is their Power - BREAK IT! (You would be well advised to stay away from the Public Servant.)

Judicial Activism is Criminal Breach of Trust.
Axe Activist Judges!!!!

Judicial Activism is Criminal Breach of Trust.
Axe Activist Judges!!!

JUDICIAL IMMUNITY
is predicated on
JUDICIAL IMPARTIALITY

JUDICIAL ACTIVISM
is CRIMINAL BREACH OF TRUST

JUDICIAL GLOBALIZATION is TREASON

AXE ACTIVIST JUDGES!!!

The Courts and other Law professionals are firstly Clerks and Stewards of WRITTEN and Common Law having since 1649 NO LEGISLATIVE POWERS.

The Courts, the Law Societies and many other Offices of the public service are themselves Creations of Parliament by virtue of PARLIAMENTARY STATUTE. They cannont be anything other than SUBORDINATE to Parliament. The Courts and the Law Societies have no Jurisdiction other than that delegated to them by Parliament.

The Court's role is to ADMINISTER the Statutory Laws, tested for "Fairness" against the historic benchmark of British Common Law, but always with NO LEGISLATIVE POWERS and always witout capacity to create Law.

In recent years, Courts and Lawyers have brazenly referred to Judges Orders as "Case Law", in what is clearly a Criminal Breach of Trust, that has yet to be successfully struck down by Parliament.

Parliament is "Supreme" over the Courts & Public Servant. The Electorate is Supreme over Parliament at the end of a Term. Within a Term, the Electorate may Appeal to the Constitutional Monarch (who has NO Legislative powers) to Dissolve Parliament and Call an Election. This is our system, forged in 1649 that the World has envied and emulated. Since 1982, this remains unchanged with the possible exception of a Constitutional Amendment. To satisfy the Amending Formula, contending Provinces are invited to go to the SCC for Mediation.

We're not sure how an Appeal to the Queen post-1982 would work out because it has until recently been unnecessary. But if the SCC claims to have displaced Parliament in some fashion, it cannot claim to have assumed parliamentary powers without also assuming parliamentary vulnerability to removal upon Appeal of the Electorate. A Canadian Appeal goes first, of course to the Governor General. At any time, since 1982 the Notwithstanding Clause gives any Province the right to unravel the 1982 changes, and essentially revert back to the 1867 relationships. The SCC did NOT become "supreme" in 1982. 2003-06-15 If judges want to make policy, they should disrobe and run for office Judges must still confine themselves to the Law as it is written by Parliamentarians, not by Law Faculties nor by fellow Judges, nor by the dreaded Star Chamber. (which Courts claim permits them to commit crimes with impunity, Star Chamber. Judicial Immunity) The old Liberals created this viral threat to Canadian Representative Democracy by inviting the Judiciary to implement policies which would fail if exposed to the censorship of Parliament. The old Liberal Governments stood by and did NOTHING as the SCC began squatting on Parliament's Supremacy in Legislation and its derivative Policy. Liberal Leader Bill Graham continues to act as SCC Lackey while the Judiciary takes the reins of Power from our Parliament, moving Canadians without Liberal opposition towards Serfdom of the Electorate and a Judicial Neo-Feudalism. Young Opposition MPs need to ponder why they would follow Graham's continuing support for the SCC's squatting on Parliamentary Supremacy. Opposition MPs must SUPPORT the Government to remove Activist Judges as soon as they commit the Offence, to preserve Canadians' self government and international autonomy.

2006-05-10 Vellacott resigns aboriginal post, <Liberals support Supremacy of SCC>;

2006-05-10 Conservative MP Maurice Vellacott resigns as Chairman ... Aboriginal Affairs Committee, CPAC video

More: Issues: Judicial Activism is Breach of Trust;
Issues: Judicial Globalization is Treason;
Issues: Cromwell, Oliver: Parliamentary Supremacy
Issues: Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges;
Issues: "Judicial Interpretation" to pervert Statutes of Parliament;
Issues: Supremacy of Parliament;
News: Beverly McLachlin: Canada's Treasonous Chief Judge

HRH Queen Elizabeth, Constitutional Monarch of the Commonwealth

Since the Declaration of the Commonwealth in 1649 - an outcome of the English Civil War - the British Monarch has become a "Constitutional Monarch".  Beginning with the Magna Charta , the vocabulary of the various Agreements made during the devolution of powers are clearly those of a Trust, and the Positions created along the way and how they are structured are also those of a TRUST.   The Monarch, since King Richard the Lionheart is the TRUSTEE,    Parliament, the Trustee, and the monarch's Governors, the scrutineers of Parliament as Trustees.

See also Reformation Day, October_31st; and Guy Fawkes / Bonfire Night, November 5 - Origins

As Constitutional Monarch, our Queen, her Courts, her federal Governor General, and her provincial Lieutenant Governors MUST REMAIN SILENT on political process. The totality of Legislative powers are granted only to Parliament.

The Queen retains the right , however to - on APPEAL regarding a potentially corrupt or tyrannical Government - to Order the Dissolution of Parliament and put the legislative process back into the hands of the people by calling an Election.

The British Monarch remains the Legal Guardian & Protector of her subjects' self-government against a Parliament or Court who for a time exercise her ABSOLUTE powers of legislation IN TRUST by virtue of their election.

The devolution of Monarchial powers to an elected Parliament began in Britain during the Crusades, was formalized in the Magna Carta in 1215, and became absolute with the Declaration of the Commonwealth in 1649 following the trial and Execution of Charles I for Treason.   (So should Activist Judges be tried!!!) These changes were pursued largely due to the availability and popularization in the common Languages of the Bible. Bible reading during the Reformation provided a documented Challenge to the claims that the Legislators ruled by "Divine Right".   Puritans like Cromwell sought to create a Congregational form of civil government with which to displace the Pontiffs of his day.

Charles I had unfortunately insisted on pursuing the European example in his use of the dreaded "Star Chamber" - a secret Court which could unlawfully impose any penalty in it's victims with impunity. Although formally abolished in subsequent years, lawyers tell us the Star Chamber continues to function within the Canadian Judiciary today as a not-so-secret Secret Society.

In the restored Monarchy of William and Mary, the English Bill of Rights, 1689, also required that the Sovereign cannot deny certain rights, such as Freedom of Speech in Parliament, Freedom from Taxation without Parliament's consent and Freedom from Cruel and Unusual punishment.

Many fathers, mothers & children would argue that the BC's "Ministries" routinely deal out "Cruel and Unusual Punishment".

SCC Chief Justice Beverly McLachlin on Divine Right of Judiciary

2006-04-26 A Judge's Right <to Judicial Activism>, Chief Justice Beverly McLachlin on Divine Right of Judges, SCC.pdf;

1609-xx-xx King James I, On Divine Right of Kings

1649-01-30 Charles I of England, Tried and beheaded for Treason;
Divine Right of <Judiciary>;

International Association of Women Judges;

National Association of Women Judges;

National Organization of Women

BC Judge & Pedophile, David Ramsey, Special Prosecutor

BC MP Svend Robinson, Special Prosecutor

BC Judges Mary Southin & Duncan Shaw support Pedophile rights

Byron Prior goes to Ottawa

More: Judicial Tyranny

2006-05-13 Judges rule supreme <McLachlin claims>, Michael Coren; "Let us be entirely candid here. ...   Consider this quotation: "The rule of law requires judges to uphold unwritten constitutional norms, even in the face of clearly enacted laws or hostile public opinion. I believe that judges have the duty to insist that legislative and executive branches of government confirm to certain established and fundamental norms, even in times of trouble." The author? Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin ...   Soon after Rosalie Abella was appointed to the Supreme Court in 2004, of course, it told the government of Canada that opposition to gay marriage <and the expunging of NATURAL PARENTS' RIGHTS> was unconstitutional -- effectively forcing the hand of a Liberal party that had never once listed gay marriage as a policy and had in fact voted against it at all previous conventions."

In Commonwealth Countries virtually all Powers, including that of Legislation have since 1649 been removed from the Monarch and vested in Parliament, as Trustee for the Electorate. The vestigial powers of the Constitutional Monarch include Ordering a dissolution of Parliament on Appeal by the Electorate, precipitating an Election. Crimes of Treason once committed against the person of the Monarch, are now committed jointly against Crown & Parliament, supposing the Electorate has made no Appeal.

2006-05-xx Attack on judiciary shatters strategic silence, MP's shot at Chief Justice brings Conservative disdain for judges back into spotlight;

Another example of a Public Servant in Breach of Trust calling for the resignation of a duly elected Representative MP.   Removing an MP is the job of the Electorate, not some puffed-up Public Servant and her Cabal!   It is SCC Chief Beverly McLachlin, of course, who should have been forced to resign on penalty of criminal prosecution when she first moved into Judicial Activism.

The Charter Revolution & the Court Party - Google Search by F.L. Morton & Rainer Knopff
Feminism, Socialism, and Communism are one in the same, Catharine A. MacKinnon

The Supremacists: The Tyranny Of Judges And How To Stop It
by Phyllis Schlafly
Summary of what has happened in Divorce Law since 1970, Adrian Pellman,LLB, UK; "Essentially, what has happened is that the Courts have virtually turned the Law upside down, contrary to the express intention of Parliament..."

Charter Rights of Natural Fathers ignored by Activist Judges

The most outrageous example of Judges usurping the role of Parliament is, of course these "New Priests" making the false claim that the Charter's protection against discrimination based on "sex" means protection against discrimination based on "sexual orientation". Does the Charter protect sexual orientations such as polygamists, pedophiles and bestiality? Of course not!

What the Charter DOES say is:

S.15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, SEX, age or mental or physical disability.

S.28. Notwithstanding anything in this Charter, the rights and freedoms referred to in it are guaranteed equally to MALE and FEMALE persons.

The Charter makes absolutely NO REFERENCE to SEXUAL ORIENTATION. This is simply a wish of the Judiciary they have read into the Charter, while ignoring the clear wishes of the Electorate. On this point they have simply been taking care of their own. See: Egan v. Canada - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Similarly the Family Law Judges, in BC especially, typically ignore the Statutes of Parliament in the Divorce Act, which require Judges to remove custodial rights of a Parent who will not use those rights to maintain the relationship with the other parent, usually the mother, and assign those rights to the other parent, usually the father.

The Charter's usage of the word "sex" is as the common usage of "gender". The Charter's clear intent is that there to be no discrimination between male and female, even in such questions as Parenting.   The Courts are driven inexorably towards Equal Parenting by the Charter, the "Supreme Law of Canada". And yet they do not comply with our instructions to them in the Statutes of a duly elected Parliament.
2006-xx-xx Why Shared Parenting Should Be Implemented, Rinaldo Del Gallo

Father's and Charter Rights, Dave M, 2006

"...    The common law states this: "The father is the owner of the child, against the world, as against the mother".

The government of Canada states this:

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on ... sex ....,

and

28. Notwithstanding anything in this Charter, the rights and freedoms referred to in it are guaranteed equally to male and female persons.

So, the position of the law is sole paternal custody, the position of the Queen as personified by Parliament is that no one employed by government may discriminate based on gender, and yet, over ninety percent of the custody cases brought to court produce sole maternal custody orders.

Effectively the Courts brought in divorce on demand and the presumption of sole maternal child custody in express defiance of Parliament. The lawyers and judges of Canada, in conspiracy and collusion with their professional "friends" around the world, (the example here is from Great Britain) have stated this: "nothing should change" from what they have decided on their own to do.

"The Courts have quite willfully frustrated the intentions Parliament. I was actually present at a seminar when the 1984 Act, which was supposed to have altered things, had just been produced and an eminent Barrister said that “it was the opinion of the judiciary that nothing should change”. Just as courts had turned the 1970 Act upside down they simply denied the spirit of the 1984 Act." The Pellman Brief Adrian Pellman, solicitor. 2003 Pellman's, 1 Abbey Street, Eynsham. Oxford. 0X6 1HR. Tel:01865-884400. Fax: 01865-8844.

What this adds up to is known as "Mixed War", a condition defined by Black's Law Dictionary as that in which a portion of the government (in this case the state paid and authorized courts) engages in hostile actions against a segment of the population (in this case fathers and/or married men). Normally, men know no choice but to fight against a declaration of war. The alternative is ignoble oblivion. However, ....

Being that males have a predisposition to 'protect' women and children, they have for far too long deferred to the predations that are being foisted upon them. And due to the subtlety of the propaganda war that is being waged ....

Men are being yoked and chained to slavery by the courts of Canada. Their love of their children and their own value to society are being held worthless by these courts because ..., well ..., hey! It's just business! ...   "      ..   David M, Surrey, BC

Judicial "Bench gods" Attack the Canadian Family

• Watch the CFAC VIDEO message "Canadian Judicial: "Bench gods" (2.8MB - WMF)

• Read the CFAC News Release (1-3-2007)
• Read the REAL Women of Canada Media Release (1-3-2007)
• Decision opens up 'Pandora's Box" for family law says Catholic Rights League (1-3-2007)
• Read the Institute for Canadian Values News Release (1-3-2007)
• Read this website by a woman raised by a homosexual parent (1-3-2007)
• My Father Was an Anonymous Sperm Donor by Katrina Clark, Dec 17, 2006, The Washington Post

2003-03-12 Heather Has 3 Parents, Stanley Kurtz

Judicial Activism is Criminal Breach of Trust.
Axe Activist Judges!!!!

JUDICIAL IMMUNITY
is predicated on
JUDICIAL IMPARTIALITY

JUDICIAL ACTIVISM
is CRIMINAL BREACH OF TRUST

JUDICIAL GLOBALIZATION is TREASON

AXE ACTIVIST JUDGES!!!

The Courts and other Law professionals are firstly Clerks and Stewards of WRITTEN and histori British Common Law having since 1649 NO LEGISLATIVE POWERS.

The Courts, the Law Societies and many other Offices of the public service are themselves Creations of Parliament by virtue of PARLIAMENTARY STATUTE. They cannont be anything other than SUBORDINATE to Parliament. The Courts and the Law Societies have no Jurisdiction other than that delegated to them by Parliament.

The Court's role is to ADMINISTER the Statutory Laws, tested for "Fairness" against the historic benchmark of British Common Law, but always with NO LEGISLATIVE POWERS and always witout capacity to create Law.

In recent years, Courts and Lawyers have brazenly referred to Judges Orders as "Case Law", in what is clearly a Criminal Breach of Trust, that has yet to be successfully struck down by Parliament.

More: Issues: Judicial Activism is Breach of Trust;
Issues: Judicial Globalization is Treason;
Issues: Cromwell, Oliver: Parliamentary Supremacy
Issues: Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges;
Issues: "Judicial Interpretation" to pervert Statutes of Parliament;
Issues: Supremacy of Parliament;
News: Beverly McLachlin: Canada's Treasonous Chief Judge

CBA = Canadian Bar Association demands resignation of MPs who criticize Activist Judges

Brian Tabor President

Never Vote for a Lawyer, the Law Societies already run the Courts, and demand the Resignation of MPs who criticize Activist Judges.

Canadian Bar Association - Google Search
Canadian Bar Association - Google Video
More: News: Canadian Bar Association demands resignation of MPs who criticize Activist Judges, Brian Tabor President
News: Beverly McLachlin: Canada's Treasonous Chief Judge;
Issues: Cromwell, Oliver: Parliamentary Supremacy;
Issues: Supremacy of Parliament;
Issues: "Judicial Interpretation" to pervert Statutes of Parliament;
Issues: Judicial Globalization is Treason

Beverley McLachlin: Canada's Treasonous Chief Judge

McLachlin for Judicial Globalization & Judicial Displacement of Parliament

CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS IN CANADA!

More: News: Beverly McLachlin: Canada's Treasonous Chief Judge;
Issues: Cromwell, Oliver: Parliamentary Supremacy;
Issues: Supremacy of Parliament;
Issues: "Judicial Interpretation" to pervert Statutes of Parliament;
Issues: Judicial Globalization is Treason

"Case Law" is not Law, it is merely "Stare Decisis"

Activist Judges are in Criminal Breach of Trust

Stare Decisis: Latin: "stay with what has been decided."

Case Law, Canada - Google Search:
Case Law, US - Google Search
Stare Decisis - Google Search

Judges and lawyers often refer to what is called "Case Law" which simply is the past decisions of judges made in other cases. In reality, there is no such thing as "Case Law" because Judges don't have the necessary Jurisdiction to make Law.

Only Parliament has that Jurisdiction.. The Courts are Agents of the Crown, and what Jurisdiction they have has been delegated to them BY STATUTE of Parliament. Their role is the ADMINISTRATION of Law created by our elected Parliament, not it's creation.

Nevertheless, your lawyer, whose career depends upon his submission to the Judges, may tell you as we have been told repeatedly, that "It doesn't matter what the Statue says..... all that matters is what the Judge says.   Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these days.   This is a Bluff of the Activist Judges, which you must Call.

More:   Issues: Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges and Legal Oligarchy;
Issues: "Judicial Interpretation" to pervert Statutes of Parliament;
Issues: Judicial Activism is Breach of Trust;
Issues: Judicial Globalization is Treason

Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges and Legal Oligarchy

Chapter VII. The English Common Law. Section 57. The Norman Conquest

A beautiy of British Common Law is that it is STATIC, and NOT DYNAMIC as these Activist Judges would have you think.
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and they will likely tell you it is "Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say "Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these days".
This is completely FALSE. The Judges are Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since 1649, only PARLIAMENT has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was only observed and documented by individuals sent out by the newly Norman Crown after the Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the laws and customs of the various peoples of Britain.. This was done with a view to aggregate existing customs which may vary across the land, into a unified body of Laws. The Authority quoted by the Commoners in their administration of Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the Bible and principles of Danelaw
The process of documentation took only a couple of hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body of Law which was historical, popular, and has served in the intervening centuries as a Benchmark against which Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness". It does NOT change.
More:   Issues: Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges and Legal Oligarchy;
Issues: "Judicial Interpretation" to pervert Statutes of Parliament;
Issues: Judicial Activism is Breach of Trust;
Issues: Judicial Globalization is Treason

Pierre Trudeau, BIH: Pal of Gorbachev & Castro; Critic of Thatcher & Regan

Pierre E Trudeau, BIH,
1919 – 2000

Pierre E Trudeau is listed in the Guinness Book of Records as being the Prime Minister with the longest time in office of any Commonwealth PMO, having a 23 year "reign of terror".. He popularized open contempt for the Electorate with his "Fuddle Duddle" responses to questions and his "Trudeau Salute". Strangely, many Canadians thought more of him for it. That tells you something about Canadians!

By talking the Provinces into going to the Judiciary for "Binding Arbitration" on future Constitutional Amendments during the nefarious "Constitution Act, 1982", Trudeau gave the Judiciary it's first toe into the formerly closed door on Parliamentary Supremacy and Judicial subordination to Parliament.
Trudeau then invited Supreme Court Judges to make decisions he couldn't survive if he took them to the Electorate; and encouraged the Judiciary and PACs to expand their role in Governmental decision making. Making Activist Judges in the SCC the norm, he successfully conned Canadians into thinking Parliament is bound by SCC's decisions. By this skillful lawyering.    Trudeau successfully sidestepped both Parliamentary Accountability to the Electorate, and to their Protector, the Queen.

Canadians have been so slow in correcting Trudeau's displacement of Parliament with Judicial Oligarchy, Judges are now openly and regularly striking down Parliamentary Statutes, and committing with impunity High Treason by incorporating Judgments of Foreign Judges and legislative bodies into Canadian Orders, and writing Legislative scripts for lackey parliamentarians like James Moore
Affirmative Action Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin as Judicial Whip for insists Canadian Judges be far more aggressive in asserting the power of Trudeaus' Judicial Oligarchy to speedily harmonize Canadian Statute with the Global Judiciary's specifications..

FYI, virtually everything Trudeau accomplished in 1982 can be undone via the "Notwithstanding Clause"
More: News: Trudeau, Pierre: Pals with Gorbachev & Castro, Critic of Thatcher & Regan;
News: Fabian Society, Communitarian "Wolves in Sheep's' Clothing";
News: John Dewey, Educating Americans for Hegelian Communitarianism, (AKA Marxism)

Judge Rosalie Abella, Criminal Breach of Trust of a Public Officer

"It's like playing God. There're nobody there to tell you if you're right or wrong"

Abella, Judge Rosalie - Google Search;Judge Rosalie Abella, Justice - Google Videos

2006-03-05 Judicial Bias at the Ontario Court of Appeal, Roscoe.pdf;

"This study analyzes family law decisions at the Ontario Court of Appeal from the mid 1990’s to the mid 2000’s. Records from 7 judges are compared for over 140 family law cases. ...    It can be concluded a man had a 96.4 % chance of losing on all issues, but a woman had a 92.9 % chance of winning on at least some issues when appearing before Justice Rosalie Abella .."

More: News: Abella, Judge Rosalie, SCC;
Issues: Affirmative Action
Issues: Breach of Trust of a Public Officer
Issues: Judicial Activism is Breach of Trust;
Issues: Breach of Trust of a Public Officer

Judicial Activism, Judicial Tyranny - Google Search

Supremacy of Parliament

2005-12-13 Criminal Code on Organized crime struck down my BC Government Directory, Heather Holmes, BCSC Judge

Liberal Irwin Cotler: "Natural Parents have NO RIGHTS"

Irwin Cotler, former Liberal "Justice" Minister robbed Canadians of their NATURAL PARENTS' Rights

Liberal Anne McLellan says "Joint Custody Perpetuates the domination of men over women"

Former Liberal Justice Minister, Deputy Prime Minister

Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges and Legal Oligarchy

McKenzie & Pedersen, the "Two Robs", Equal Parenting Bike Trek US 2006, 2007...

Beware of the "Parental Rights" IMPOSTER!!!!

"Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights"

Bill Graham, Liberal <Pedophile> Leader & Defense Minister

Margaret Somerville, The Case Against “Same-Sex Marriage”

Judicial Activism is Criminal Breach of Trust. Axe Activist Judges!!!!

Judicial Activism is Criminal Breach of Trust. Axe Activist Judges!!!

HRH Queen Elizabeth, Constitutional Monarch of the Commonwealth

Charter Rights of Natural Fathers ignored by Activist Judges

Father's and Charter Rights, Dave M, 2006

Judicial Activism is Criminal Breach of Trust. Axe Activist Judges!!!!

CBA = Canadian Bar Association demands resignation of MPs who criticize Activist Judges

Brian Tabor President

Beverley McLachlin: Canada's Treasonous Chief Judge

McLachlin for Judicial Globalization & Judicial Displacement of Parliament

"Case Law" is not Law, it is merely "Stare Decisis"

Activist Judges are in Criminal Breach of Trust

Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges and Legal Oligarchy

Pierre Trudeau, BIH: Pal of Gorbachev & Castro; Critic of Thatcher & Regan

Pierre E Trudeau, BIH, 1919 – 2000

Judge Rosalie Abella, Criminal Breach of Trust of a Public Officer

McKenzie & Pedersen, the "Two Robs",
Equal Parenting Bike Trek US 2006, 2007...

Judicial Activism is Criminal Breach of Trust.
Axe Activist Judges!!!!

Judicial Activism is Criminal Breach of Trust.
Axe Activist Judges!!!

Judicial Activism is Criminal Breach of Trust.
Axe Activist Judges!!!!

Pierre E Trudeau, BIH,
1919 – 2000