senators know that I have studied a terrible and pernicious
heart of darkness
that has developed in our court system, being the use of
FALSE ACCUSATIONS in civil justice.
is the mischief of litigating parties, usually mothers,
suddenly within the context of divorce and within child
custody proceedings falsely accusing the other party,
usually fathers, of the sexual abuse of their own children.
FALSE ACCUSATIONS are often made with the overt
or covert complicity of their
lawyers. They are a
lethal weapon in the business of parental alienation. They
are a tool for achieving sole custody of children and
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage
16.10 Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal
BREACH OF TRUST"
the ideas that the State assigns
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from
pre-war Nazi Germany. Under the British system
rights are not State-given, but God Given.
Buying into the Court's position that what
rights remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same
position that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and
Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and
they will likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these
This is completely FALSE. The Judges
are Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT
CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
PARLIAMENT has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was
only observed and documented by individuals sent out by the
newly Norman Crown after the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the
laws and customs of the various peoples of Britain..
This was done with a view to aggregate existing customs
which may vary across the land, into a unified body of
Laws. The Authority quoted by the Commoners in their
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
The process of documentation took only a
couple of hundred years, and
the product was a STATIC body of Law which was historical,
popular, and has served in the intervening centuries as a
Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
Corpus : "literally, "you
may have the body". A Habeas
Corpus is a legal writ that protects an individual against arbitrary
imprisonment by requiring that any person arrested be brought before
a court for formal charge. If the charge is considered to be valid,
the person must submit to trial; if not, the person goes free. When
the law is suspended, then individuals can be imprisoned
indefinitely and without charge."
Skeletons in the Closet, a film drawn from the dramatized lives
of families living with a protected
Pedophile and the mental
illness it may create when a loving, faithful, Victim keeps the
Secret. This is shockingly
common. The Secret is their Power -
(You would be well advised to stay away from the Public Servant.)
a) NOT report results of studies which do
not show "expected results", and
b) if "unexpected results do eventually get
reported, they may only be reported with "expert" commentary to
explain away the deviation from the expected result that "Men are
violent" and "Women are their Victims".
The World Health has as a primary Sponsor, the
Rockefeller Foundations, a
Fabian Socialist group
which has as it's aim the conversion of the West to a Soviet style
block which can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.
See Norman Dodd.
Opponents of Equal Parenting like to tell you
that seventy something percent of Custody Cases don't go to Trial,
and are awarded as Sole Custody to Mom BY CONSENT.
What they don't tell you is that in ninety
something percent of Custody Cases that do go to Trial Mom gets Sole
Custody anyway, and Dad has to pay on top of his Lawyer fees, the
Court Costs for having lost his Application. Faced with these
abysmal odds, Dads are commonly told to "Just give her what she
wants so you can have a good relationship with her". Under
Duress many Dads foolishly acquiesce .... for
a time at least......
We prefer that Natural Parents NOT sign a Consent
Order that is not completely Equal with respect to Gender, as the
relationship of the divorced couple is greatly destabilized with
each injury to the equality of parental powers .
Pedophile Activists obviously don't go around
telling you what they're up to. Instead they call
themselves "Mentors", "Social
Workers", "Feminists" or "Homosexual Rights Activists". In
Canada, Pedophile Activists have been successful in getting
greater access to children by reducing the
of Consent to ,
and in eliminating a parents "right to know" when the child reaches
the age of
replacing them with school counselors and
Social Workers, and by, of course, eradicating fathers from
their children's lives entirely from birth on request by the mother.
the recent changes to accommodate homosexual marriage, the right of
natural parents to "parent" their natural children will soon be
removed entirely. Through these statutory changes, the term
"LEGAL PARENT" is replacing the
historic term "NATURAL PARENT"
in Canadian statutes. As a result Natural
Parents can no longer automatically claim to be the Legal Parents of
their own natural children at birth. Instead, to accommodate
the Homosexual Activists' plan to push Natural Parents aside when it
comes to parenting children, the Courts alone now decide who will be
the "parents' of all children born in Canada.
Activists are often lawyers, school counselors, teachers,
Social Workers, Sex Ed teachers,
pastors, Judges, etc. etc. They seek positions with access and
power over Children & Families, and positions to create social and
political change. The publicly undisclosed prevalence of
Pedophile & Homosexual Activists in our civil service has been
attributed to their determined politicism in the many groups like
ACT UP! , the secrecy of the
alliances made in various "secret societies" and sex clubs, and to
Sexual Nepotism in the workplace.
"Legal Abuse Syndrome" is a Post-Traumatic Stress
Disorder, PTSD acquired through prolonged exposure to Crooked Courts
Legal Abuse Syndrome written by
Karin Huffer is the result of her experiences for over
twenty years as a marriage and family counselor in private
practice. What is unique about this book is that it addresses
the victims of legal abuse from a psychological therapeutic
perspective. The objective is to move the victim beyond their
predicament into positive action and thinking. Ms. Huffer
illustrates the abuses with the cases of seven victims of Legal
Abuse Syndrome, detailing their pain and suffering and the
various stages of the therapy they have undergone for recovery
of their emotional health.
Ms. Huffer found that many victims of the legal system suffer
from Post Traumatic Stress
identified this as Legal Abuse Syndrome, brought on by the
abusive and protracted litigation, prevalent in our courts.
According to Ms. Huffer you may be suffering from Legal Abuse
Syndrome if you feel deeply disillusioned and oppressed as a
result of your experience with the legal system; if you feel
you were frustrated in obtaining justice; if you feel your
dreams and plans for your life were torn from you by a system
that is supposedly there to protect your rights and property; if
you fear that the system will defeat you at every turn and there
is nothing you can do about it, and if you feel that you have
been victimized several times over, by the perpetrators, by
lawyers, judges, bailiffs and other court personnel.
As a consequence you may suffer from tension and anxiety,
recurring nightmares you may feel emotionally an physically
exhausted, numb, disconnected and vulnerable.
A central point of
Ms. Huffer’s book is that the victims in America are not only
assaulted by crime, but also by the abuses of power and
authority administered by tax dollars intended to provide due
process of law for the protection of civil rights.
Ms. Huffer observes that not only does the justice system move
slowly, but delays are used as strategy by attorneys to weaken
their opposition economically and emotionally and to provide
hefty fees for attorneys. Ms. Huffer notes that when courts fail
as a consequence of officially sanctioned wrongdoing it leaves
victims and vigilantes in its trail. The rage of these victims
accumulates when they are not provided a satisfying place to
turn to. She concludes that the enormous betrayals and
inefficiencies that make up bureaucratic post-crime experiences
are literally attacking the emotional health of the nation. She
recommends that the community of American citizens adopt the
1. Oppression and abuse of power are injurious to the
health of the victims. Domination by abusers of bureaucratic
power threatens the very functionality of the public and private
sections in our country.
2. Victims are not self interested, narcissistic folks who sit
around and wallow in their losses. They are courageous
individuals who face their pain and care to right the wrongs.
They participate in the collision of evil and good as it is
classically intended in order to achieve balance. Denial is
popular, but far less responsible.
3. Trust is a social staple that must be protected just as
earth and water must be protected to provide for survival. When
trust is damaged the community suffers and society as a whole
will eventually falter and collapse (Bok). Veterans of crime
must exude zero tolerance for lying in courtrooms, lying in
political campaigns, lying to cover-up, and deceptions through
omission and nonperformance by public officials and public
A new cause of action that is a new bases for
lawsuits is being accepted by the courts allowing cases to
proceed on claims of "organic brain injury" caused by traumatic
stress. An article appeared on this on November 11, 2002 in the
National Law Journal. Click here to see full article.
Harassment related emotional distress is being recognized in the
work field upon which lawyers are now suing. To read the article
by by Joni Johnston, Psy.D. Click here There is no reason why
the same facts and reasoning should not apply to the harassment
inflicted on victims in a lawsuit.
Personal Injury - New Ways to Win An Emerging Cause of
Claims That Post-traumatic Stress Has Created an Organic
Margaret Cronin Fisk
The National Law Journal
November 8, 2002
In lawsuits involving plane crashes, plaintiffs are prevented by
Warsaw Convention from recovering for purely emotional
injuries. In many states, as well, recovery for emotional
distress is severely limited. This can diminish the prospects
for collecting damages for post-traumatic stress disorder.
But courts have now begun accepting claims of organic brain
disease as an end-result of post-traumatic stress. In August
2001, for example, Delta Air Lines was hit with a $1.25 million
verdict in a lawsuit brought by a woman who contended that the
fright she experienced during a harrowing Delta flight caused a
harmful chemical reaction in her brain. Following the flight,
plaintiff Kathy Weaver began experiencing "psychotic
flashbacks," in which she would continually relive the incident,
reports plaintiffs' attorney Randy Bishop of Billings, Mont. She
contended that the terror had a physical impact on her brain
through the release of "excitotoxins" -- chemicals that kill
In the pretrial order rejecting Delta's motion for summary
judgment, U.S. District Judge Jack Shanstrom in Montana found
that the plaintiff had provided sufficient proof, in the form of
articles in scientific journals and expert reports, that
"extreme stress causes actual physical brain damage," in
particular, "physical destruction or atrophy of portions of the
brain." The verdict was reduced to $75,000 and settled.
v. Delta Air Lines Inc., No. CV 98 151BLGRFC (D. Mont.).
In January 2002, the Washington Court of Appeals ruled similarly
in a separate case. Plaintiff Lein Trinh had been involved in an
automobile accident in Seattle in which she was not hit, though
one friend was killed and another injured. She contended that
the emotional distress she experienced watching her friend die
created physical manifestations, says plaintiff's attorney
Betsylew Miale-Gix of Seattle's Adler Giersch.
Trinh had sought benefits from Allstate Insurance, but Allstate
rejected the claim, contending that the uninsured motorist
policy involved provided no coverage for emotional distress that
was not a result of physical injury. The trial court agreed with
Allstate and dismissed Trinh's claim.
The Washington appellate court, however, reversed, finding that
"'bodily injury' includes emotional injuries that are
accompanied by physical manifestations" and remanded the lawsuit
to trial. In September, the Washington Supreme Court denied
Allstate's petition for cert. No trial date has been set. Trinh
v. Allstate Insurance, No. 002105827 (King Co., Wash., Super.
Proving a brain injury brought on by psychological stress can be
difficult, Bishop notes. "Brain scans are not likely to
demonstrate physiological change because any change occurs at
the cellular level." Instead, he says, the plaintiff's attorney
has to provide medical literature on the effect of such stress
on the brain and accompany this with testimony and affidavits
from physicians and experts.
In Trinh, adds Miale-Gix, the plaintiff also used the testimony
of lay witnesses to establish the concrete physical
manifestations she exhibited following the accident, including
hair loss, weight loss and muscle spasms.
"Legal Abuse Syndrome"
"LAS" is a Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder,
acquired through prolonged exposure to Crooked Lawyers & Courts
Lawyers consistently estimate the homosexual fraction of
the Law Societies & Judiciaries as "forty-something" percent.
a randomly selected Judge or Lawyer is about thirty
TIMES more likely to be homosexual than the population at large
Imputed Income assessed to Dads with no Job or
If a BC Judge thinks the Child Support you
pay based on your real Income isn't enough, they might impute Income to
you to artificially boost the Support Cheque. These "judgments' can be
free-wheeling, arbitrary and punitive for all members of the Victim's
"I get government cheques..... you stupid
Canadians.. I get government cheques.", Korean Realtor
Canadian Affirmative Action programs coupled with massive
immigration from "non-traditional" sources to accommodate UN commitments
precluded white males and many white females from employment and progressive
employment in government offices.
These same White Males are now routinely subjected to Imputed
Income by Family court Judges - the majority of whom are beneficiaries of
Affirmative Action programs - when Dad's incomes aren't as high as the Judge
expects them to be.
"I am writing on behalf of
Darrin Bruce White. I am the oldest of his four
children. My name is Ashlee A D Barnett-White. ...
No one would listen to my father , no one
would give him a chance to speak. ... My dad was an abused
husband, he was abused by his wife, and the justice system.
... He was a kind man who fought a good fight but no matter
what he did or said, he could never win with this system.
Things need to change for all fathers going through this
same thing. We need to help, too many kids go without a
father because of this , too many kids are hurt."
Ashlee A D Barnett-White, Eldest Daughter
Senator Nancy Schaefer and her husband Bruce have died from
a single shot wound each.
was shot once in the back while she lay sleeping. Her husband
Bruce was shot once in the chest.
Both shots were
Two shots, Two Kills
The deaths are being handled as
a 'murder-suicide'. More likely Bruce was shot
in the chest while confronting the Shooter having been woken by
the the shot that killed Nancy.
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.