senators know that I have studied a terrible and pernicious
heart of darkness
that has developed in our court system, being the use of
FALSE ACCUSATIONS in civil justice.
is the mischief of litigating parties, usually mothers,
suddenly within the context of divorce and within child
custody proceedings falsely accusing the other party,
usually fathers, of the sexual abuse of their own children.
FALSE ACCUSATIONS are often made with the overt
or covert complicity of their
lawyers. They are a
lethal weapon in the business of parental alienation. They
are a tool for achieving sole custody of children and
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage
16.10 Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal
BREACH OF TRUST"
the ideas that the State assigns
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from
pre-war Nazi Germany. Under the British system
rights are not State-given, but God Given.
Buying into the Court's position that what
rights remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same
position that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and
Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and
they will likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these
This is completely FALSE. The Judges
are Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT
CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
PARLIAMENT has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was
only observed and documented by individuals sent out by the
newly Norman Crown after the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the
laws and customs of the various peoples of Britain..
This was done with a view to aggregate existing customs
which may vary across the land, into a unified body of
Laws. The Authority quoted by the Commoners in their
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
The process of documentation took only a
couple of hundred years, and
the product was a STATIC body of Law which was historical,
popular, and has served in the intervening centuries as a
Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
Corpus : "literally, "you
may have the body". A Habeas
Corpus is a legal writ that protects an individual against arbitrary
imprisonment by requiring that any person arrested be brought before
a court for formal charge. If the charge is considered to be valid,
the person must submit to trial; if not, the person goes free. When
the law is suspended, then individuals can be imprisoned
indefinitely and without charge."
Skeletons in the Closet, a film drawn from the dramatized lives
of families living with a protected
Pedophile and the mental
illness it may create when a loving, faithful, Victim keeps the
Secret. This is shockingly
common. The Secret is their Power -
(You would be well advised to stay away from the Public Servant.)
a) NOT report results of studies which do
not show "expected results", and
b) if "unexpected results do eventually get
reported, they may only be reported with "expert" commentary to
explain away the deviation from the expected result that "Men are
violent" and "Women are their Victims".
The World Health has as a primary Sponsor, the
Rockefeller Foundations, a
Fabian Socialist group
which has as it's aim the conversion of the West to a Soviet style
block which can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.
See Norman Dodd.
Opponents of Equal Parenting like to tell you
that seventy something percent of Custody Cases don't go to Trial,
and are awarded as Sole Custody to Mom BY CONSENT.
What they don't tell you is that in ninety
something percent of Custody Cases that do go to Trial Mom gets Sole
Custody anyway, and Dad has to pay on top of his Lawyer fees, the
Court Costs for having lost his Application. Faced with these
abysmal odds, Dads are commonly told to "Just give her what she
wants so you can have a good relationship with her". Under
Duress many Dads foolishly acquiesce .... for
a time at least......
We prefer that Natural Parents NOT sign a Consent
Order that is not completely Equal with respect to Gender, as the
relationship of the divorced couple is greatly destabilized with
each injury to the equality of parental powers .
Pedophile Activists obviously don't go around
telling you what they're up to. Instead they call
themselves "Mentors", "Social
Workers", "Feminists" or "Homosexual Rights Activists". In
Canada, Pedophile Activists have been successful in getting
greater access to children by reducing the
of Consent to ,
and in eliminating a parents "right to know" when the child reaches
the age of
replacing them with school counselors and
Social Workers, and by, of course, eradicating fathers from
their children's lives entirely from birth on request by the mother.
the recent changes to accommodate homosexual marriage, the right of
natural parents to "parent" their natural children will soon be
removed entirely. Through these statutory changes, the term
"LEGAL PARENT" is replacing the
historic term "NATURAL PARENT"
in Canadian statutes. As a result Natural
Parents can no longer automatically claim to be the Legal Parents of
their own natural children at birth. Instead, to accommodate
the Homosexual Activists' plan to push Natural Parents aside when it
comes to parenting children, the Courts alone now decide who will be
the "parents' of all children born in Canada.
Activists are often lawyers, school counselors, teachers,
Social Workers, Sex Ed teachers,
pastors, Judges, etc. etc. They seek positions with access and
power over Children & Families, and positions to create social and
political change. The publicly undisclosed prevalence of
Pedophile & Homosexual Activists in our civil service has been
attributed to their determined politicism in the many groups like
ACT UP! , the secrecy of the
alliances made in various "secret societies" and sex clubs, and to
Sexual Nepotism in the workplace.
"There is an
inherent bias in the system. Any man that has
gone through the system
laugh at the suggestion that there is no gender
bias. Every family lawyer who is in the business
knows that there is gender bias. It's only the
law society and defenders-of-the-victim
feminists…who stand up and deny all of this."
UBC Chair in Feminist Legal Studies
"My view would
be that if anything, it's gender bias against
women and mothers as much as it
be against fathers. Actually, I did a study
with a research group and some students, a
sample of child-custody
from across Canada.…We didn't find any gender
bias against fathers."
"Vancouver lawyer Carey
Linde is one of the city's foremost crusaders for
fathers' rights. So it shouldn't be a big surprise that
he wants Attorney General Wally Oppal to amend the
Family Relations Act to recognize that fathers have
equal rights as parents in custody, access, and
guardianship. ... In an
interview in his Howe Street office, Linde said this
could be accomplished by introducing a new section in
the law stating that there is a
"rebuttable presumption of shared
parenting". "If one parent says I want 50-50
access, it's going to have to be the other parent to
prove it shouldn't be the case," Linde said. "Now it's
the complete reverse." ... The
attorney general's ministry is reviewing the Family
Relations Act. Linde noted that there is already a legal
presumption that property acquired after marriage should
be divided equally. But Linde suggested that the onus is
still on men to prove why they should have an equal
right to parenting. "Where the time and money and energy
is being spent now is on children, because there is no
presumption," Linde said. ... He
added that he doesn't think the courts should be allowed
to rebut shared parenting if one parent makes
allegations about the other's treatment of the children
without corroborating evidence or without a report from
a doctor or registered psychologist. Linde also said
that the past and present conduct of the parents toward
one another should also be irrelevant after they've
2007-06-14 Linde stirs custody debate - Georgia
definition of the term ‘misandry’ probably followed several tracts of reasoning.
Most texts define misandry as the "hatred of men". Since ‘-andry’ can mean
either men, boys, or males; I define the misandry as the hatred of males.
I saw a public service advertisement that said something like this: "This
is little Bobby asleep in his mother’s arms. Someday, Bobby will go to school,
graduate from college, find a good job, and provide a good home. Also, Bobby
will batter his wife." I have seen several versions of this message and
all maintain the presumption that infant boys will become wife beaters because
they are male. Hence, misandry is the hatred of males.
the desire or the acts to subjugate, oppress, punish,
harm, injure, or murder males because of their gender.
the deliberate preference of a female's lie against the
the belief that no father can be a fit parent.
the assumption that masculinity, male physiology, and
male hormones cause males to become evil, sexually abusive, oppressive, and
violent. The corollary assumption is we must raise boys as we do girls, in
the image of misandry, without regard to a child's unique qualities,
preferences, hopes, and desires.
the assumption that every male is or can become sexually
abusive, oppressive, and violent.
the assumption that females cannot be sexually abusive,
oppressive, and violent.
the attribution of negative qualities and humanity's
historic evils to the entire male gender while ignoring female culpability.
the promulgation of false statistics against males
regarding rape and family violence. The parallel assertion that female acts
of abuse and violence against males are insignificant and are justified as
the tolerance of female violence and abuse toward males.
the suppression of evidence of female violence and abuse
the encouragement, filing, support, or toleration of
false allegations and charges against a male because of his gender. The
corollary is the encouragement, filing, support, toleration of her false
allegations against a male because of her gender.
lying or the deliberate creation of false information
against any male because of his gender.
the deliberate repression or distortion of facts showing
female culpability or affirming a male's innocence.
the suppression of a male's testimony because of his
the falsification of transcripts, police reports, court
reports, and evidence such that the fraud adversely affects a male.
the denial of historic male spiritual, intellectual,
humanitarian, and material contributions to civilization.
the act of coercing women to lie against their husbands.
the act of coercing children to lie against their
the act of encouraging and instructing females to
contrive, or testify to, false allegations of family violence, child abuse,
child molestation, or rape against a male.
the act of making false allegations of family violence,
child abuse, child molestation, or rape against a male.
the act of falsely testifying against a male, supporting
false allegations of family violence, child abuse, child molestation, or
blaming males for all psychological and social maladies.
encouraging or persuading another to lie against a male
because of his gender.
the beating or abuse of a male by a female for personal
satisfaction or material gain.
the violence against women act.
failure to provide males equal protection under the law
(Amendment 14, Section 1).
Child Sexual Abuse: Intervention and Treatment Issues.
Kathleen Coulborn Faller, 1993, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
- Administration for Children and Families - Administration on Children,
Youth and Families - National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect. " This
manual was developed and produced by The Circle, Inc., McLean, VA, under
subcontract No. S105-89-1730 to Westover Consultants, Inc."
the use of female pronouns to refer to victims and male
pronouns to refer to assailants, rapists, and suspects.
Other Parts of Speech
adj. (1) practicing misandry (2) of or characterized by misandry.
misandric (mis'-an'-dric) adj.
characterized by misandry.
misandrist (mis-an'-drist) n. one who
Dealing with Misandry
Misandry is a world wide problem. Those who practice misandry
abuse men, women, and children. These purveyors of hate do not support the right
of all people to live safely and free of false accusations. They do not care
about the damage they cause. They want to exercise their personal power and
influence over others.
Most people are not aware of what is happening in our courts. So, become
informed about gender and accusatorial preference in our courts. Take note of
this behavior and discuss it with others.
The greatest danger is that judges, prosecutors, and others possess immunities
that protect them from criminal prosecution and civil liability for their public
crimes and civil torts. These people are not subject to public scrutiny and
Change the law and provide reparations, restitution, and redress for those who
have been wronged. Outlaw immunity. Demand punishment of any public official or
other person who has lied or used coercive or persecutive measures to, or in an
attempt to, imprison, or distress another. Demand changes in the law that
removes the statutes of limitations for these crimes.
Misandry, misogyny (hatred of women), and accusatorial preferences have no place
in our society. We cannot have equality and opportunity when gender preference
is so prevalent in our justice system.
is the hatred of
males as a sex, as opposed to
misogyny, the hatred of women; or
misanthropy, hatred of the human species. Misandry
comes from misos (Greek
μῖσος, "hatred") + andr-ia (Greek
anér-andros, "man"). Those holding misandric
beliefs can be of either sex."
Affirmative Action has made White Heterosexual Anglophone Males (WHAMs) a Class
of employment ineligibility & PC Hatred since 1980
"I get government cheques..... you stupid
Canadians.. I get government cheques.", Korean Realtor
Canadian Affirmative Action programs coupled with massive
immigration from "non-traditional" sources to accommodate UN commitments
precluded white males and many white females from employment and progressive
employment in government offices.
These same White Males are now routinely subjected to Imputed
Income by Family court Judges - the majority of whom are beneficiaries of
Affirmative Action programs - when Dad's incomes aren't as high as the Judge
expects them to be.
senators know that I have studied a terrible and pernicious
heart of darkness that has developed in our court system, being
the use of
FALSE ACCUSATIONS in civil justice.
This is the
mischief of litigating parties, usually mothers, suddenly within
the context of divorce and within child custody proceedings
falsely accusing the other party, usually fathers, of the sexual
abuse of their own children. ,,,
FALSE ALLEGATIONS are often made with the overt or
covert complicity of their lawyers. They are a lethal weapon in
the business of parental alienation. They are a tool for
achieving sole custody of children and creating fatherlessness."
Senator Nancy Schaefer and her husband Bruce have died from
a single shot wound each. The deaths are being handled as
a 'murder-suicide'. <Ha!> The husband shot once in the chest.
Nancy was shot once in the back. Both shots were
lethal. Two shots, Two Kills
Lawyers consistently estimate the homosexual fraction of
the Law Societies & Judiciaries as "forty-something" percent.
That is, a randomly selected Judge or Lawyer is about thirty
times more likely to be homosexual than the population at large
Sexual psychopath. His
'data' mostly came from sexual psychopaths, sex offenders,
criminals, pedophiles, male prostitutes, and promiscuous
homosexuals. Two of his "co-investigators" were serial
Rex King, convicted of 800 counts of child rape involving
both sexes, and
Fritz von Balluseck, an ex-Nazi convicted of the rape-murder
of a ten-year-old girl in Berlin
Kinsey solicited and encouraged pedophiles, at home and abroad,
to sexually violate from 317 to 2,035 infants and children for
his alleged data on normal "child sexuality."
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.