senators know that I have studied a terrible and pernicious
heart of darkness
that has developed in our court system, being the use of
FALSE ACCUSATIONS in civil justice.
is the mischief of litigating parties, usually mothers,
suddenly within the context of divorce and within child
custody proceedings falsely accusing the other party,
usually fathers, of the sexual abuse of their own children.
FALSE ACCUSATIONS are often made with the overt
or covert complicity of their
lawyers. They are a
lethal weapon in the business of parental alienation. They
are a tool for achieving sole custody of children and
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage
16.10 Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal
BREACH OF TRUST"
the ideas that the State assigns
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from
pre-war Nazi Germany. Under the British system
rights are not State-given, but God Given.
Buying into the Court's position that what
rights remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same
position that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and
Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and
they will likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these
This is completely FALSE. The Judges
are Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT
CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
PARLIAMENT has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was
only observed and documented by individuals sent out by the
newly Norman Crown after the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the
laws and customs of the various peoples of Britain..
This was done with a view to aggregate existing customs
which may vary across the land, into a unified body of
Laws. The Authority quoted by the Commoners in their
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
The process of documentation took only a
couple of hundred years, and
the product was a STATIC body of Law which was historical,
popular, and has served in the intervening centuries as a
Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
Corpus : "literally, "you
may have the body". A Habeas
Corpus is a legal writ that protects an individual against arbitrary
imprisonment by requiring that any person arrested be brought before
a court for formal charge. If the charge is considered to be valid,
the person must submit to trial; if not, the person goes free. When
the law is suspended, then individuals can be imprisoned
indefinitely and without charge."
Skeletons in the Closet, a film drawn from the dramatized lives
of families living with a protected
Pedophile and the mental
illness it may create when a loving, faithful, Victim keeps the
Secret. This is shockingly
common. The Secret is their Power -
(You would be well advised to stay away from the Public Servant.)
a) NOT report results of studies which do
not show "expected results", and
b) if "unexpected results do eventually get
reported, they may only be reported with "expert" commentary to
explain away the deviation from the expected result that "Men are
violent" and "Women are their Victims".
The World Health has as a primary Sponsor, the
Rockefeller Foundations, a
Fabian Socialist group
which has as it's aim the conversion of the West to a Soviet style
block which can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.
See Norman Dodd.
Opponents of Equal Parenting like to tell you
that seventy something percent of Custody Cases don't go to Trial,
and are awarded as Sole Custody to Mom BY CONSENT.
What they don't tell you is that in ninety
something percent of Custody Cases that do go to Trial Mom gets Sole
Custody anyway, and Dad has to pay on top of his Lawyer fees, the
Court Costs for having lost his Application. Faced with these
abysmal odds, Dads are commonly told to "Just give her what she
wants so you can have a good relationship with her". Under
Duress many Dads foolishly acquiesce .... for
a time at least......
We prefer that Natural Parents NOT sign a Consent
Order that is not completely Equal with respect to Gender, as the
relationship of the divorced couple is greatly destabilized with
each injury to the equality of parental powers .
Pedophile Activists obviously don't go around
telling you what they're up to. Instead they call
themselves "Mentors", "Social
Workers", "Feminists" or "Homosexual Rights Activists". In
Canada, Pedophile Activists have been successful in getting
greater access to children by reducing the
of Consent to ,
and in eliminating a parents "right to know" when the child reaches
the age of
replacing them with school counselors and
Social Workers, and by, of course, eradicating fathers from
their children's lives entirely from birth on request by the mother.
the recent changes to accommodate homosexual marriage, the right of
natural parents to "parent" their natural children will soon be
removed entirely. Through these statutory changes, the term
"LEGAL PARENT" is replacing the
historic term "NATURAL PARENT"
in Canadian statutes. As a result Natural
Parents can no longer automatically claim to be the Legal Parents of
their own natural children at birth. Instead, to accommodate
the Homosexual Activists' plan to push Natural Parents aside when it
comes to parenting children, the Courts alone now decide who will be
the "parents' of all children born in Canada.
Activists are often lawyers, school counselors, teachers,
Social Workers, Sex Ed teachers,
pastors, Judges, etc. etc. They seek positions with access and
power over Children & Families, and positions to create social and
political change. The publicly undisclosed prevalence of
Pedophile & Homosexual Activists in our civil service has been
attributed to their determined politicism in the many groups like
ACT UP! , the secrecy of the
alliances made in various "secret societies" and sex clubs, and to
Sexual Nepotism in the workplace.
Ann Coulter: Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Assembly
"Anti-hate," hate crimes legislation now before Congress is
touted as a sincere attempt to end violent crimes of prejudice.
Yet nearly identical laws in Canada and some European countries
have led to a virtual ban of public discussion on certain
"taboo" topics. Also, public criticism of some "identifiable
groups" can be a crime, subject to large fines and years of
imprisonment. In this unprecedented expose, author and filmmaker
Ted Pike rips the cover off this little-known conspiracy against
freedom by the B'Nai B'Rith and its "Anti-Defamation League."
Now is the time to protest to your elected representatives in
Congress - before it is too late.
Provost Francois Houle sent Coulter a note before her speech
on Tuesday, urging her to educate herself about Canada's hate
laws, saying that promoting hatred against an identifiable group
could lead to criminal charges.
The inflammatory commentator pulled out of that appearance after
1,500 people tried to get into the venue that was already filled
to capacity with pre-registered guests. Another few hundred
loudly protested her speech outside the building.
In a column posted on the American conservative website
Townhall.com , Coulter said
she hopes the "august" human rights commission will find out
whether the university has warned any other speakers to watch
their words or if it's a caution reserved for female
"If a university official's letter accusing a speaker of having
a proclivity to commit speech crimes before she's given the
speech — which then leads to Facebook postings demanding that
Ann Coulter be hurt, a massive riot and a police-ordered
cancellation of the speech — is not hate speech, then there is
no such thing as hate speech," she wrote.
Canadian conservative Ezra Levant, who helped bring Coulter
north of the border, confirmed he had been retained by the fiery
pundit, but said he had been too busy with the tour to research
what legal actions she could potentially take.
The school's president, former Liberal cabinet minister Allan
Rock, issued a statement underlining that the institution would
remain "a safe and democratic environment for the expression of
Ann Coulter on UK BBC Newsnight interview with Jeremy Paxman
"Hate Crime" Thought Police, Tyranny of Human Rights Tribunals
The "Hate Law" did grievous harm to the Canadian Justice System
by creating a tool to crush Dissenters in Criminal Court for a
"Speech Crime", and by changing the criterion of a "Crime" from
creating an tangible harm or loss to creating a subjective "Hurt
Feelings" of the Complainant.
Send Robinson (right) cries while being supported by his partner Max
Riveron. Robinson claimed "stress" caused him to steal the
jewelry he intended to give his boyfriend. Robinson
continues to practice law in BC.
Possession or distribution of literature must not be made a
crime, or excuse full time surveillance by a "Thought Police".
Lawmakers and Judges both have perverted
principles of Free
Speech and Freedom of Assembly rather than call Child
Pornography what it really is,
Physical Evidence of a crime against a child.
Our position is that the "Hate Crimes" legislation must be
abolished, and that Pedophiles must not remain the protected
class they have obviously become.
The crime of a Pedophile must be limited in what they do with a
child, however, and not what they do with their imagination.
When the Pedophile is found with printed and photographic
materials that evidences sexual abuse of a child, it is the
relationship of the possessor to the Perpetrator that is in
question, not the choice of reading materials The printed
and photographic materials found with the Pedophile must be
traced back to it's source to protect the child and the family
the child was taken from.
"It’s a funny thing about free speech:
It can’t be just for your political friends. If freedom means
anything, it is the one valuable gift you have to give to your
worst enemies, in order to keep it for yourself."
Lawyers consistently estimate the homosexual fraction of
the Law Societies & Judiciaries as "forty-something" percent.
That is, a randomly selected Judge or Lawyer is about thirty
times more likely to be homosexual than the population at large
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.