
Issues Area Home
1215: MAGNA CARTA, JUNE 15TH Issues Summaries Abortion Veto for Dads Adoption Veto for Dads Adopted Children Disallowed NPs Affirmative Action Age Of Consent Anti-Depressants, Drug Induced Suicide Battered Woman Syndrome BC Vital Statistics Act Misandry BC Legislature MUST Big Brother, Micro-Management Bill C-22 Birth Rate Displacement Best interests of the Child Breach of Trust "Case Law" is NOT Law CCA Wood and Playgrounds Child Support Tables / SOW Fraud "Child's Right" or "Parents' Right" Child Trafficking by Public Officers Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges Compulsory Drugging of Children Corren Agreement Court Ordered Sexism Credit Crisis, Currency Replacment Custody Orders not Enforced Debtor's Prison Reinstituted Day Care Universal Deadbeat Dad Propaganda Disabled parents DISS = Divorce Initiated Suicide Synd. Domestic Violence Propaganda Division of Assets Enticement Seduction Tort Claims Precluded Estate Taxes Thieve a Child's Inheritance Euthanasia, Spousal Ex Parte Orders False Accusations Father Hatred Propaganda Fatherlessness, State Imposed Federal Reserve / Fiat Currency FEMA Camps, Martial Law Femi-Narcissism Feminism = Socialism = Nazism Fitness Test for Natural Parents in Divorce Fitness Test for Students: "Transitions" FMEP = Family Maintenance Enforcement Forgiveness is NOT Compulsory Freedom of Speech Friendly Parent Rule, Max. Contact Fundamental Justice Globalism is Treason Global Warming Fraud "Climategate" Habeas Corpus Abandoned "Hate Crime" Speech Police Homofacism Homosexual Violence Homosexual Activism Homosexual Marriage "Human Rights” Commissions in Canada Human Trafficking Imputed Income: Fraudulent CS Orders Inheritance Theft: Grey & Black Widow Judicial Activism is Breach of Trust Judicial Falsification of Court Transcripts Judicial Freemasonry is Racketeering Judicial Globalization is Treason Judicial Interpretation Judicial Racketeering, Law Societies' Rackets Kinship Families / Grandparents Law Societies' Self Regulation, Corruption Lawyers Lying in Court Legal Abuse Syndrome Letters to MP Letters to MLA Letters to Editor Malicious Mother Syndrome Malicious Prosecution Misandry = Hatred of Males Monetary Crisis: "Money as Debt" Move Aways Narcissism Natiional Sovreignity Natural Parents Rights Eliminated, SSM NAU = North American Union Net Neutrality: Keep Internet Free!! No Fault Divorce NCR = Not Criminally Responsible Oath Keepers Parliament MUST Parental Alienation Parental Kidnapping Parenting Time Presumption Passport & DL Removal Paternity Denied, Birth Registration Paternity Fraud, Birth Registration Pedophiles Fear Dads New Pedophiles in Public Service Petitions Poofy Judges Predatory Pregnancy Protestant Revolution, BBC QE = Quantitative Easing Sexual Abuse by a Public Officer Sex Change Surgery Shadow Government Sole Custody is Child Abuse Special Prosecutors for Homo's & Judges Star Chamber's Secret Overlords SOW = Status of Women, KILL IT!!!! Stockholm Syndrome Paradigm Shift Straw Man Redemption, Free Man Supremacy of Parliament Target Legislation Teachers displacing Parents Teachers Seducing Students Tracts and Flyers Treasonous Public Officers not Prosecuted Transcripts & Documents altered by Judges "Women's Shelters" = Lesbian Gulags |
|







Albrecht, Katherine : RFID Spychips Angry Harry Annett, Kevin: Child Trafficking in BC Asher, Jeffrey Baskerville, Stephen: "Taken .. Custody Baxter, Dorian: Canada Courtwatch Beck, Glenn Beck: World Government Bennett, Richard: Purpose Driven Church Blick, Edward: Global Warming & Marxism Blumner,Court Ordered Sexism Burrows, Lynette: Homo Adoption Carley, Dr. Rebecca: Vaccinations Carr, William Guy: Pawns in the Game Christie, Doug: Freedom of Speech Chopra, Dr. Shiv: Health Canada Coulter, Ann: Free Speech Cools, Senator Anne: Lying Lawyers Coffman, Dr. Michael: Global Warming Coleman, John: Global Warming Fraud Coleman, Dr. John (MI6) Comittee of 300 Conspiracy of Silence, Boystown Pedophiles Coren, Michael: Islamophobia, Homophobia Crane, Ian: Codex Alimentarius Scam Cromwell, Oliver: Supremacy / Parliament Cuddy, Dennis L. "Power Elite" Cumbey, Constance : New Age Nazism Cummins, John: BC Conservative Party Delaney, Chris : "No HST in BC!" Dioguardi, Joe: Saving US / Debtors' Prison Dodd, Norman: NWO Fabian Socialists Duane, James:"Don't Talk to Police" Dutton, Don: RADAR, "Rethinking DV" EP-Australia Estulin, Daniel: Bilderberg Group Evans, Stanton: "Blacklisted, Joe McCarthy" Federer, Bill: Endang'd Speeches, Quran Farrell, Warren: Why Men Earn More Fischer, Greg: Family Preservation Festival Fogal, Connie: No NAU Forseth, MP Paul: FTSOTC Panelist Fromm, Paul: Free Speech, CAFE FTSOTC 48 Recom's Gage, Richard: Architects & Engineers 9/11 Gairdner William Galloway, Roger: FTSOTC Panelist Geldof, Sir Bob: The Love.. Gerrish, Brian: EU's "Common Purpose" Griffin, G. Edward: Fed Reserve Grignon, Paul: "Money As Debt" Gunderson, Ted: FBI, Protected Pedophiles Haeck, Lisa: Sexual Abuse Haines, Bruce, QC: Justice Review Hein, Arnie: "Cross My Heart" EP Trek 2005 Hiebert, MP Russ: Human Rights Commission Hill, MP Jay: EP Legislation Hinton , Betty: Status of Women's "Hit List" Holland, Lary: "GET OFF THE BENCH" Horowitz, David: Islamofacism, Universites Howse, Torm Hunt, Dave: Woman / Beast "In a Small Town" Pedophile Boy Scouts Iserbyt, Charlotte: Dumbing Down Jones, Alex Kay, Barbara, National Post Kennedy, John F: Assassination 1963 Kernberg, Dr. Otto: Personality Disorder Kerkman, Larry : CRISPE Keyes, Alan : Knight, Robert: Obama's "Radical Rulers" Kruk, Edward: Child Custody Leslie, Sarah: "Pied Pipers of Purpose" Levant, Ezra: HRT, Islam, Freedom of Speech LInde, Carey: Statutory Ammendments Lively, Scott: "Pink Swastika" Loftus, Elizabeth: Recovered Memories Myth Luther, Martin: "Sola Scriptura" Macdonald, Peter: "Taxcap" limits Debt Man, Woman, & Myth Matrisciana, Caryl: Islam Rising, FITNA Martin, Malachi: Globalization, Occult McManus, John: Stopping NAU McKay, Dr. Marty McLean, Candis MacKenzie, Rob: EP Trek 2006 Menard, Robert: "Bursting Bubbles" McQuaid, Robert: Fix CAS Millar, David Mills, Dennis: MP Targetted by Homsexuals Monckton, Lord Christopher Monarchy, David Starkey Monteith, Dr. Stanley: Aides / Luciferians Morris, Dick: G-20 Vs US Sovereignty Murtari, John: NCP Hunger Striker Nash, Dave: Cross Canada Run Nazanin: Persian Beauty for a Free Iran Neufeld, Gordon: Hold - Kids Nicholson, Robert: BC's Protected Pedophile Rings Nicolosi, Joseph: Homosexuality Norton, Bob: Family Court Watcher O'Connor, Matt: Original F4J-UK PAFE = Planetary Alliance, Fathers in Exile Palin, Sarah Paul, Dr. Ron: Sound Money Peck, Dr. Scott: "People of the Lie" Pedersen, Rob: EP Bike Trek US, 2007 Pellman, Adrian, LLB: Judicial Activism Perloff, James: Shadows of Power Phenomenon: The Lost Archives Pizzey, Erin: Women's Shelter Scam Plywood Man, NWT Protestant Revolution, BBC Quigley, Carroll: Banking, Globalization Rhodes, Carol: Child Support Riplinger, Gail: Luciferian Bibles Roberts, Carey Roberts, Elise: False Allegation of Abuse Roscoe, Peter: Judicial Bigotry Russo, Aaron: NAU, CFR, Rockefellers Ruppert, Michael C Saburido, Jacqueline: Don't Drink Sacks. Glenn Secret Files of the Inquisition Schlafly, Phyllis: Global Governance Simons, Frank: Courts From Hell Schafer, Nancy: Child Trafficking at CPS Schiff, Peter: Currency Crisis, Debt Ceiling Shafarevich, Igor: The Socialist Phenomenon Short, David: St. John's Anglican Shrimpton, Michael , QC: Intelligence Shrout, Winston: Common Law Simpson, Kari: Road Kill Radio Smith, Ron: DC Rally, Drugging of Children Soever, Alar: SOW's Child Support Fraud Sodhi, Eeva Somerville, Margaret:“Same-Sex Marriage” Still, Bill: "Money Masters", "Mystery of Oz" Stopps, Gordon Vs Just Ladies, BCHRT Stormer, John: Betrayed .. Bench Story, Christopher: "Perestroika Dec. Sutton, Anhony: Wall Street & Hitler Taylor, Captain Tony: "Fatherless Day" Trociuk Darrell, BC Birth Registration Tyndale, William, "God's Outlaw", RIP 1536 V for Vendetta / Guy Fawkes the Hero van Gogh, Theo: Islamic Violence Vellacott, MP Maurice Ventura, Jesse: Conspiracy Theory Vieira, Dr. Edwin: Fiat Empire Wagener, William Wallace, Tom: Sharia Law in UK & US Warren, Elizabeth: Collapse Middle Class Watson, Paul: EU's Nazi Origins William III & Mary II: "Bill of Rights" 1689 Wooldridge, Nancy: Canadian Grans World, Gordon: Sexualizing BC Children Youth Protecting Youth (YPY), UVic Zepezauer, Frank: Feminist Crusades |
|
Let Ex Husbands Be Fathers Perception vs Reality Some Facts... Both Parents Vital Broken Homes, Bleak Future Justice Review Fatherneed Rights of fathers Ignored? |
|
Support one of over 50 class-actions against
unconstitutional 'sole custody' by Indiana Civl Rights
Council
thetruthandjusticefoundation.org
BC Statutory Amendments |
McKenzie & Pedersen, the "Two Robs",
Equal Parenting Bike Trek US 2006, 2007...

Robb MacKenzie Equal Parenting Bike Trek - Google Search;
Robb MacKenzie Equal Parenting Bike Trek - Google Video

Rob Pederson, Equal Parenting - Google Search;
Robert Pederson, Equal Parenting - Google Video

Cycling4Children.com
Equal Parenting Bike Trek's photostream
More:
Issues:
McKenzie & Pedersen, the "Two Robs", Equal Parenting Bike
Trek US 2006, 2007...;
Issues: Smith,
Ron: DC Family Preservation Rally, Compulsory Drugging
of Children;
Issues:
Compulsory Drugging of Children, Thymerisol; |
Beware of the "Parental Rights" IMPOSTER!!!!

"Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights"
Be on the lookout for the "Parent's
Rights" IMPOSTER. Insist on "Natural Parents Only",
please!
It comes as a big surprise to us that
many groups that present themselves as
"Parents Rights" groups REFUSE to defend the
NATURAL PARENT, and
and to demand RESTORATION
of
Natural Parents Rights taken from Canadians in the
Homosexual Marriage
legislation.

Instead their position to promote the
"rights" of a "Parent" in the widest sense of the
word, making NO distinction between
NATURAL PARENTS and
wannaabe
Legal Parents. They have bowed to
University of
Victoria's assertion that the SCC's
Trociuk
Decision
"endorses a Heterosexual View of the Family and must be
ignored", legitimizing the ongoing
Child
Trafficking by the State which views
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in
the lucrative Child
Adoption Market They refuse to be hampered by prior
obligations to that pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can
Veto an Adoption.


It appears that many
"Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United
Nations and Liberal
Irwin Cotler's assertion that the
Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent
has "NO RIGHTS",
making the State, not the Natural
Parents the Protector of the Child..
Without Cause or
Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!
More:
About:
Beware of the IMPOSTER!!!! "Natural Parent's Rights"
Vs "Parent's Rights";
News: Lessard, Hester - Heterosexual view of
Parenthood must be ignored
News: Smith,
Judge Daphne, BCSC, for Child Trafficking;
Issues: Trociuk,
Darrell;
Issues:
Child Trafficking, Canadian;
Testimonials: Rick Fredrickson of Saskatoon |
Bill Graham, Liberal <Pedophile> Leader & Defense
Minister




Bill Graham, mp - Google Search;
Bill Graham, mp - Google Video
Lawrence Metherel - Google Search

2007-06-19 Liberal MP Bill Graham announces
resignation
"In spite of credible revelations dating back to April 2002
about Bill Graham, a sex addicted bi-sexual sodomizing a 15
year old male prostitute named
Lawrence Metherel,
Paul Martin allowed Graham to remain
Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister - and eventually named
him to the portfolio of Minister of Defense.
"On Sept. 28/2005 a vote was held in Parliament to raise the
age of consent from 14 (one of the lowest age of consents in
the world) to 16 (an age which many still consider too low).
"Bill Graham, Paul Martin, and Anne McLellan, on Sept. 28th,
voted against raising the age of consent to 16


More:
News: Graham,
Bill: Pedophile Parliamentarian, Defense Minister |


















 |
Habeas
Corpus : "literally, "you
may have the body". A Habeas
Corpus is a legal writ that protects an individual against arbitrary
imprisonment by requiring that any person arrested be brought before
a court for formal charge. If the charge is considered to be valid,
the person must submit to trial; if not, the person goes free. When
the law is suspended, then individuals can be imprisoned
indefinitely and without charge."
.....
More,
Glossary of
terms |
|

Skeletons in the Closet, a film drawn from the dramatized lives
of families living with a protected
Pedophile and the mental
illness it may create when a loving, faithful, Victim keeps the
Secret. This is shockingly
common. The Secret is their Power -
BREAK IT!
(You would be well advised to stay away from the Public Servant.) |
| |
Joint Committee's 48 Recommendations, "For the Sake of
the Children", (FTSOTC)
|
48 Recommendations of the Joint Committee
1. This Committee recommends that the Divorce Act be amended to
include a Preamble alluding to the relevant principles of the United
Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. (page 23)*
2. This Committee recognizes that parents' relationships with
their children do not end upon separation or divorce and therefore
recommends that the Divorce Act be amended to add a Preamble
containing the principle that divorced parents and their children
are entitled to a close and continuous relationship with one
another. (page 23)
3. This Committee recommends that it is in the best interests of
children that they have the opportunity to be heard when parenting
decisions affecting them are being made; those whose parents divorce
have the opportunity to express their views to a skilled
professional, whose duty it would be to make those views known to
any judge, assessor or mediator making or facilitating a shared
parenting determination; a court have the authority to appoint an
interested third party, such as a member of the child's extended
family, to support and represent a child experiencing difficulties
during parental separation or divorce; the federal government work
with the provinces and territories to ensure that the necessary
structures, procedures and resources are in place to enable such
consultation to take place, whether decisions are being made under
the Divorce Act or provincial legislation; and we recognize that
children of divorce have a need and a right to the protection of the
courts, arising from their inherent jurisdiction. (page 23)
4. This Committee recommends that where, in the opinion of the
court, the proper protection of the best interests of the child
requires it, judges have the power to appoint legal counsel for the
child. Where such counsel is appointed, it must be provided to the
child. (page 23)
5. This Committee recommends that the terms ``custody and
access'' no longer be used in the Divorce Act and instead that the
meaning of both terms be incorporated and received in the new term
``shared parenting", which shall be taken to include all the
meanings, rights, obligations, and common-law and statutory
interpretations embodied previously in the terms ``custody and
access". (page 27)
6. This Committee recommends that the Divorce Act be amended to
repeal the definition of ``custody'' and to add a definition of
``shared parenting'' that reflects the meaning ascribed to that term
by this Committee. (page 28)
7. This Committee recommends that the federal government work
with the provinces and territories toward a corresponding change in
the terminology in provincial/territorial family law. (page 28)
8. This Committee recommends that the common law ``tender years
doctrine'' be rejected as a guide to decision making about
parenting. (page 28)
9. This Committee recommends that both parents of a child receive
information and records in respect of the child's development and
social activities, such as school records, medical records and other
relevant information. The obligation to provide such information
should extend to schools, doctors, hospitals and others generating
such information or records, as well as to both parents, unless
ordered otherwise by a court. (page 28)
10. This Committee recommends that all parents seeking parenting
orders, unless there is agreement between them on the terms of such
an order, be required to participate in an education program to help
them become aware of the post-separation reaction of parents and
children, children's developmental needs at different ages, the
benefits of cooperative parenting after divorce, parental rights and
responsibilities, and the availability and benefits of mediation and
other forms of dispute resolution, provided such programs are
available. A certificate of attendance at such a post-separation
education program would be required before the parents would be able
to proceed with their application for a parenting order. Parents
should not be required to attend sessions together (page 30).
11. This Committee recommends that divorcing parents be
encouraged to develop, on their own or with the help of a trained
mediator or through some form of alternative dispute resolution, a
parenting plan setting out details about each parent's
responsibilities for residence, care, decision making and financial
security for the children, together with the dispute resolution
process to be used by the parties. Parenting plans must also require
the sharing between parents of health, educational and other
information related to the child's development and social
activities. All parenting orders should be in the form of parenting
plans. (page 32)
12. This Committee recommends that the relationships of
grandparents, siblings and other extended family members with
children be recognized as significant and that provisions for
maintaining and fostering such relationships, where they are in the
best interests of those children, be included in parenting plans.
(page 32)
13. This Committee recommends that the Minister of Justice seek
to amend the Divorce Act to require that parties applying to a court
for a parenting order must file a proposed parenting plan with the
court. (page 32)
14. This Committee recommends that divorcing parents be
encouraged to attend at least one mediation session to help them
develop a parenting plan for their children. Recognizing the impact
of family violence on children, mediation and other non-litigation
methods of decision making should be structured to screen for and
identify family violence. Where there is a proven history of
violence by one parent toward the other or toward the children,
alternative forms of dispute resolution should be used to develop
parenting plans only when the safety of the person who has been the
victim of violence is assured and where the risk of violence has
passed. The resulting parenting plan must focus on parental
responsibilities for the children and contain measures to ensure
safety and security for parents and children. (page 33)
15. This Committee recommends that the Divorce Act be amended to
provide that shared parenting determinations under sections 16 and
17 be made on the basis of the "best interests of the child". (page
44)
16. The Committee recommends that decision makers, including
parents and judges, consider a list of criteria in determining the
best interests of the child, and that list shall include
16.1 The relative strength, nature and
stability of the relationship between the child and each
person entitled to or claiming a parenting order in
relation to the child;
16.2 The relative strength, nature and
stability of the relationship between the child and
other members of the child's family who reside with the
child, and persons involved in the care and upbringing
of the child;
16.3 The views of the child, where
such views can reasonably be ascertained;
16.4 The ability and willingness of
each applicant to provide the child with guidance and
education, the necessaries of life and any special needs
of the child;
16.5 The child's cultural ties and
religious affiliation;
16.6 The importance and benefit to the child of
shared parenting, ensuring both parents' active involvement in his
or her life after separation;
16.7 The importance of relationships between the child and the
child's siblings, grandparents and other extended family members;
16.8 The parenting plans proposed by the parents;
16.9 The ability of the child to adjust to the proposed parenting
plans;
16.10 The willingness and ability of each of the parties to facilitate
and encourage a close and continuing relationship between the child
and the other parent;
16.11 Any proven history of family violence perpetrated by any
party applying for a parenting order;
16.12 There shall be no preference in favor of either parent solely
on the basis of that parent's gender;
16.13 The willingness shown by each parent to attend the required
education session; and
16.14 Any other factor considered by the court to be relevant
to a particular shared parenting dispute. (page 45)
17. This Committee recommends that the Divorce Act be amended to
ensure that parties to proceedings under the Divorce Act can choose
to have such proceedings conducted in either of Canada's official
languages. (page 46)
18. Whereas the federal government is required by statute to review
the Federal Child Support Guidelines within five years of their
implementation, this Committee recommends that the Minister of Justice
undertake as early as possible a comprehensive review of the Guidelines
to reflect gender equality and the child's entitlement to financial
support from both parents, and to give particular attention to the
following additional concerns raised by this Committee:
18.1 Incorporation into the Child Support Guidelines of the
new
concepts and language proposed by this Committee;
18.2 The impact of the current tax treatment of child support
on the adequacy of child support as it is awarded under the Guidelines
and on parents' ability to meet other financial obligations, such
as to children of second or subsequent relationships;
18.3 The desirability of considering both parents' income, or
financial capacity, in determining child support amounts, including
the 40% rule for determining whether the parenting arrangement is
``shared parenting'';
18.4 Recognition of the expenses incurred by support payors while
caring for their children;
18.5 Recognition of the additional expenses incurred by a parent
following a relocation of the other parent with the children;
18.6 Parental contributions to the financial support of adult
children attending post-secondary institutions;
18.7 The ability of parties to contract out of the Federal Child
Support Guidelines; and
18.8 The impact of the Guidelines on the income of parties receiving
public assistance. (page 51)
19. This Committee recommends that the federal government work
with the provinces and territories toward the development of a nationwide
coordinated response to failures to respect parenting orders, involving
both therapeutic and punitive elements. Measures should include
early
intervention, parenting education programs, a make-up time policy,
counseling for families experiencing parenting disputes, mediation
and, for persistent intractable cases, punitive solutions for parents
who wrongfully disobey parenting orders. (page 55)
20. This Committee recommends that the federal government
establish
a national computerized registry of shared parenting orders. (page
55)
21. This Committee recommends that the provincial and territorial
governments consider amending their family law to provide that maintaining
and fostering relationships with grandparents and other extended
family members is in the best interests of children and that such
relationships should
not be disrupted without a significant reason related to the well-being
of the child. (page 57)
22. This Committee recommends that the federal government provide
leadership by ensuring that adequate resources are secured for the
following initiatives identified by this Committee as critical to
the effort to develop a more child-centred approach to family law
policies and practices:
22.1 Expansion of unified family courts across Canada, including
the dedication of ample resources to interventions and programs
aimed at ensuring compliance with parenting orders, such as early
intervention programs, parenting education, make-up time policies,
family and child counseling, and mediation;
22.2 Civil legal aid to ensure that parties to contested parenting
applications are not prejudiced by the lack or inadequacy of legal
representation;
22.3 A Children's Commissioner, an officer of Parliament reporting
to Parliament, who would superintend and promote the welfare and
best interests of children under the Divorce Act and in other areas
of federal responsibility;
22.4 The provision of legal representation for children when appointed
by a judge;
22.5 Parenting education programs;
22.6 Supervised access programs; and
22.7 Enhanced opportunities for professional development for judges,
focused on the concept of shared parenting formulated by this Committee,
the impact of divorce on children, and the importance of maintaining
relationships between children and their parents and extended family
members. (page 59)
23. This Committee recommends that the federal government continue
to work with the provinces and territories to accelerate the establishment
of unified family courts, or courts of a similar nature, in all
judicial districts across Canada. (page 63)
24. This Committee recommends that unified family courts, in addition
to their adjudicative function, include a broad range of non-litigation
support services, which might include
24.1 family and child counseling,
24.2 public legal education,
24.3 parenting assessment and mediation services,
24.4 an office responsible for hearing and supporting children
who are experiencing difficulties stemming from parental separation
or
divorce, and
24.5 case management services, including monitoring the implementation
and enforcement of shared parenting orders. (page 64)
25. This Committee recommends that, as much as possible, provincial
and territorial governments, law societies and court administrators
work toward establishing a priority for shared parenting applications,
above other family law matters in dispute. (page 64)
26. This Committee recommends that in matters relating to parenting
under the Divorce Act, the importance of the presence of both parties
at any proceeding be recognized and emphasized, and that reliance
on ex parte proceedings be restricted as much as possible. (page
64)27. This Committee recommends that court orders respecting shared
parenting be more detailed, readable and intelligible to police
officers called upon to enforce them. (page 67)
28. This Committee recommends that provincial and territorial governments
explore a variety of vehicles for increasing public awareness about
the impact of divorce on children and, in particular, the aspects
of parental conduct upon marriage breakdown that are most harmful
to children,
and implement such education programs as fully as possible. To the
extent practicable, the Committee recommends that the federal government
contribute to such efforts within its own jurisdiction, including
the provision of funding. (page 68)
29. This Committee recommends that the federal government extend
financial support to programs run by community groups for couples
wanting to avoid separation and divorce or seeking to strengthen
their marital relationship. (page 68)
30. This Committee recommends that the Divorce Act be amended to
require (a) that a parent wishing to relocate with a child, where
the distance would necessitate the modification of agreed or court-ordered
parenting arrangements, seek judicial permission at least 90 days
before the
proposed move and (b) that the other parent be given notice at the
same time. (page 70)
31. This Committee recommends that provinces and territories and
the relevant professional associations develop accreditation criteria
for family mediators and for social workers and psychologists involved
in shared parenting assessments. (page 72)
32. This Committee recommends that federal, provincial and territorial
governments work together to encourage the development of effective
models for the early identification of high-conflict families seeking
divorce. Such families should be streamed into a specialized, expedited
process and offered services designed to improve outcomes for their
children. (page 74)
33. This Committee recommends that professionals who meet with
children experiencing parental separation recognize that a child's
wish not to have contact with a parent could reveal a significant
problem and should result in the immediate referral of the family
for therapeutic intervention.
(page 74)
34. This Committee recommends that the federal, provincial and
territorial governments work together to ensure the availability
of supervised parenting programs to serve Canadians in every part
of Canada. (page 76)
35. This Committee recommends that the Divorce Act be amended to
make explicit provision for the granting of supervised parenting
orders where necessary to ensure continuing contact between a parent
and a child in situations of transition, or where there is clear
evidence that the child
requires protection. (page 76)
36. This Committee recommends that the provincial and territorial
governments require child protection agencies to provide disclosure
of records of investigations to court-appointed assessors examining
families who have been the subject of such investigations. (page
77)
37. This Committee recommends that the attorneys general of Canada
and the provinces, along with police forces and police organizations,
ensure that all warrants in child abduction matters provide expressly
that their application and enforcement are national. (page 84)
38. This Committee recommends that the Attorney General of Canada
work to develop a co-ordinated national response to the problem
of child abduction within Canada. (page 84)
39. This Committee recommends that the unilateral removal of a
child from the family home without suitable arrangements for contact
between the child and the other parent be recognized as contrary
to the best interests of the child, except in an emergency. (page
84)
40. This Committee recommends that a parent who has unilaterally
removed a child not be permitted to rely on the resulting period
of sole care and control of the child, of whatever duration, as
the basis for a sole parenting order. (page 84)
41. This Committee recommends that the federal government implement
the recommendations of the Sub-Committee on Human Rights and International
Development of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Foreign
Affairs and International Trade entitled International Child
Abduction: Issues for Reform. (page 84)
42. This Committee recommends that the Minister of Foreign Affairs
and the Passport Office continue to examine ways to improve the
identification of minor children in travel documents and consider
further the advisability of requiring that all children be issued
individual passports. (page 84)
43. This Committee recommends that, to deal with intentional false
accusations of abuse or neglect, the federal government assess the
adequacy of the Criminal Code in dealing with false statements in
family law matters and develop policies to promote action on clear
cases of mischief,
obstruction of justice or perjury. (page 90)
44. This Committee recommends that the federal government work
with the provinces and territories to encourage child welfare agencies
to track investigations of allegations of abuse made in the context
of parenting disputes, in order to provide a statistical basis for
a better understanding of
this problem. (page 93)
45. This Committee recommends that the federal government engage
in further consultation with Aboriginal organizations and communities
across Canada about issues related to shared parenting that are
particular to those communities, with a view to developing a clear
plan of action to be
implemented in a timely way. (page 97)
46. This Committee recommends that the federal government include
as the basis for such consultations the family law-related recommendations
of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples and work toward their
implementation as appropriate. (page 98)
47. This Committee recommends that sexual orientation not be considered
a negative factor in the disposition of shared parenting decisions.
(page
99)
48. This Committee recommends that the Minister of Foreign Affairs
work toward the signing and ratification as soon as possible of
the 1996 Hague Convention on Jurisdiction, Law Applicable, Recognition,
Enforcement and Cooperation in Respect of Parental Responsibility
and Measures for the Protection of Children. (page 101)
|
|
Joint Committee's 48 Recommendations, "For the Sake of
the Children", (FTSOTC
|
|

Anne Cools - Google Search

Anne Cools' Website
Anne
Cools on False Accusations
EP Nemesis,
Liberal Hedy Fry, the Queen of FALSE ACCUSERS
"Honourable
senators know that I have studied a terrible and pernicious
heart of darkness that has developed in our court system, being
the use of
FALSE ACCUSATIONS in civil justice.
This is the
mischief of litigating parties, usually mothers, suddenly within
the context of divorce and within child custody proceedings
falsely accusing the other party, usually fathers, of the sexual
abuse of their own children. ,,,
These
FALSE ALLEGATIONS are often made with the overt or
covert complicity of their lawyers. They are a lethal weapon in
the business of parental alienation. They are a tool for
achieving sole custody of children and creating fatherlessness."
Identified Issue: Canadian Law Societies' General Failure to
Self Regulate, Members permitted to Lie in Court, Anne Cools'
Bill 2-12 provides an answer
2004-06-08 SENATOR ANNE COOLS LEAVES LIBERAL FOLD TO JOIN
Senator Anne Cools Runs Away With The Suns's 10 Top Women Poll,
Kevin Connor, TO Sun
2004-06-08 Liberal senator < Anne Cools > goes
Conservative
1997-10-28 Child Custody and Access Reform, Special Joint
Committee Established
More:
Issues: Cools, Senator
Anne
Issues:
False Accusations;
Isues Womens Shelters' Scam
Issues:Senator Anne Cools
News: Liberal Hedy Fry /
Status of Women (SOW):
Issues: Pedophiles Fear Dads |
Equal Parenting How To's

Equal Parenting is like a Three Layer Cake.
1.
The Bottom Layer: The Initial Equal Parenting Agreement
Initial Equal Parenting Agreement creating full time, all time
equality of both natural parents, subordinate to no third parties (a
Constitutional right ignored by most Family Courts); a series of
tentative
Parenting Timetables for each year and statement of intent, or
"Wishes"; the requirement that the tentative Parenting Timetable laid
out there will be reviewed and finalized annually and incorporated into
the
Annual Parenting Supplement. Parental authority and discretion
is always equal and unaffected by inequalities of Parenting Time
allocations.
2.
Middle Layer: The Annual Supplement
Yearly
Annual Parenting Supplements for planning the school year and
finalizing the
Parenting Timetable for the upcoming parenting year.
Parenting Timetable must meet the test for equality established in
1) the initial Equal Parenting Agreement.
3.
Top Layer: Autonomy of Both Equal Parents on all matters not
previously Constrained.
Parenting Timetable alternates all residual parenting questions
between the two otherwise equal parents who are subordinate to no third
parties. Full autonomy of each parent during their Parenting Time
as allotted in the agreed Parenting Timetable on all residual parenting
questions not previously constrained by Covenants in the initial Equal
Parenting Agreement, or the current Annual Parenting Supplement.
Full discretion on residual parenting with the Timetabled Parent, but
flexibility encouraged and provided by Ad Hoc Agreements.
4.
Icing on the Cake.....
Forget about the Courts and your Ex, and go have fun with your kids!!!
More:
About:
Equal Parenting How To's: Three Layer Cake;
About:
Grandparents in Equal Parenting;
About: EPR =
Equal Parenting Roundups;
About: EPT = Equal Parenting
Trek;
EP
Trek Generic Calendar
|
|
|