
Issues Area Home
Issues Summaries Abortion Veto for Dads ACTA = Anti-Counterfeiting Surveilance Adoption Veto for Dads Adopted Children Disallowed NPs Affirmative Action Age Of Consent Anti-Depressants, Drug Induced Suicide Battered Woman Syndrome BC Vital Statistics Act Misandry BC Legislature MUST Big Brother, Micro-Management Bill C-22 Best interests of the Child Birth Registration - Paternity Fraud Birth Registration - Paternity Denied Breach of Trust "Case Law" is NOT Law CCA Wood and Playgrounds Child Support Tables / SOW Fraud Child Trafficking by Public Officers Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges Compulsory Drugging of Children, Thymerisol Corren Agreement Court Ordered Sexism Credit Crisis, Currency Replacment Custody Orders not Enforced Debtor's Prison Reinstituted Day Care Universal Deadbeat Dads Disabled parents DISS = Divorce Initiated Suicide Syndrome Domestic Violence Propaganda Division of Assets Enticement Seduction Ex Parte Orders False Accusations Father Hatred Propaganda Fatherlessness, State Imposed Federal Reserve / Fiat Currency Feminism = Socialism = Nazism Fitness Test for Natural Parents in Divorce Fitness Test for Students: "Transitions" FMEP = Family Maintenance Enforcement Forgiveness is NOT Compulsory Freedom of Speech Friendly Parent Rule, Max. Contact Fundamental Justice Globalism is Treason Global Warming Fraud "Climategate" Habeus Corpus Abandoned "Hate Crime" Speech Police Homofacism Homosexual Activism Homosexual Marriage "Human Rights” Commissions in Canada Human Trafficking Imputed Income Inheritance Theft: Grey & Black Widow Judicial Activism is Breach of Trust Judicial Falsification of Court Transcripts Judicial Freemasonry is Racketeering Judicial Globalization is Treason Judicial Interpretation Kinship Families & Grandparents raising Children Law Societies' Self Regulation, Corruption Lawyers Lying in Court Legal Abuse Syndrome Letters to MP Letters to MLA Letters to Editor Malicious Mother Syndrome Malicious Prosecution MCF = Ministry Children & Families Misandry, Hatred of Males Money as Debt / Money Masters Move Aways Narcissism Natiional Sovreignity Natural Parents Rights Eliminated, SSM NAU = North American Union No Fault Divorce NCR = Not Criminally Responsible Parliament MUST Parental Alienation Parental Kidnapping Parenting Time Presumption Passport & DL Removal Pedophiles Fear Dads!! Pedophiles Fear Dads New Pedophiles in Public Service Petitions Poofy Judges Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Protestant Revolution, BBC Sexual Abuse by a Public Officer Shadow Government Sole Custody is Child Abuse Special Prosecutors for Homosexuals, Judges Star Chamber's Secret Overlords SOW = Status of Women, KILL IT!!!! Stockholm Syndrome Paradigm Shift Straw Man Redemption, Free Man Supremacy of Parliament Target Legislation Teachers displacing Parents Teachers Seducing Students Tracts and Flyers "Women's Shelters" Lesbian Gulags |
|






Albrecht, Katherine : RFID Spychips Annett, Kevin: Child Trafficking in Beautiful BC Asher, Jeffrey Baskerville, Stephen: "Taken .. Custody Baxter, Dorian: Canada Courtwatch BC Conservatives Beck, Glenn Beck: World Government Bennett, Richard: Purpose Driven & Catholicism Blick, Edward: Global Warming & Marxism Blumner,Court Ordered Sexism Boys of St. Vincent <Mount Cashel>, NL Burrows, Lynette: Homo Adoption Carley, Dr. Rebecca: Vaccinations Carr, William Guy: Pawns in the Game Christie, Doug: Freedom of Speech, Assembly Chopra, Dr. Shiv: Health Canada Coulter, Ann: Free Speech Cools, Senator Anne: Lying Lawyers Coffman, Dr. Michael: Global Warming Coleman, John: Global Warming Fraud Conspiracy of Silence, Boystown Pedophiles Cromwell, Oliver: Supremacy / Parliament Cuddy, Dennis L. Cumbey, Constance : New Age Nazism Dodd, Norman: NWO Fabian Socialists Dutton, Don: RADAR, "Rethinking DV" EP-Australia Federer, Bill: Endang'd Speeches, Quran Farrell, Warren: Why Men Earn More Fischer, Greg: Family Preservation Festival Fogal, Connie: No NAU Forseth, MP Paul: FTSOTC Panelist Fromm, Paul: Free Speech, CAFE FTSOTC 48 Recom's Gage, Richard: Architects & Engineers 9/11 Gairdner William Galloway, Roger: FTSOTC Panelist Geldof, Sir Bob: The Love.. Gerrish, Brian: EU's "Common Purpose" Griffin, G. Edward: Fed Reserve Grignon, Paul: "Money As Debt" Gunderson, Ted: FBI Haeck, Lisa: Sexual Abuse Haines, Bruce, QC: Justice Review Hiebert, MP Russ: Human Rights Commission Hill, MP Jay: EP Legislation Howse, Torm "In a Small Town" Pedophile Boy Scouts Iserbyt, Charlotte: Dumbing Down Jones, Alex Kay, Barbara, National Post Kennedy, John F: targeted for Assassination in 1963 Kernberg, Dr. Otto: Personality Disorder Kruk, Edward: Child Custody Leslie, Sarah: "Pied Pipers of Purpose" LInde, Carey Lively, Scott: "Pink Swastika" Luther, Martin: "Sola Scriptura" Macdonald, Peter: TAXCAP Martin, Malachi: Globalization, Occult McManus, John: Stopping NAU McKay, Dr. Marty McLean, Candis MacKenzie, Rob: "Paul Revere Ride", EP Trek 2006 McQuaid, Robert: Fix Children's Aide Society, CAS Millar, David Hinton , Betty: Status of Women's "Hit List" Mills, Dennis: Former MP Targetted by Homsexuals Monckton, Lord Christopher Monarchy, David Starkey Monteith, Dr. Stanley: Tax Exempt Foundations Nash, Dave: Cross Canada Run Nazanin: Persian Beauty for a Free Iran Neufeld, Gordon: Hold - Kids Nicolosi, Joseph: Treatment of Homosexuality O'Connor, Matt: Original F4J-UK PAFE = Planetary Alliance for Fathers in Exile Palin, Sarah Paul, Dr. Ron: Sound Money Peck, Dr. Scott: "People of the Lie" Pedersen, Rob: EP Bike Trek US, 2007 Pellman, Adrian, LLB: Judicial Activism Perloff, James: Shadows of Power Phenomenon: The Lost Archives Pizzey, Erin: Women's Shelter Scam Plywood Man, NWT Quigley, Carroll: Banking, Globalization Rhodes, Carol: Friend.Court = Enemy. Family Riplinger, Gail: Luciferian Bibles Roberts, Carey Roberts, Elise Roscoe, Peter: Judicial Bigotry Russo, Aaron: NAU, CFR, Rockefellers Ruppert, Michael C Saburido, Jacqueline: Don't Drink Sacks. Glenn Secret Files of the Inquisition Schlafly, Phyllis: Global Governance Simons, Frank: Courts From Hell Schafer, Nancy: Child Trafficking at CPS Simpson, Kari: Road Kill Radio Smith, Ron: DC Rally, Drugging of Children Soever, Alar Sodhi, Eeva Somerville, Margaret:“Same-Sex Marriage” Stopps, Gordon Vs Just Ladies, BCHRT Stormer, John: Betrayed .. Bench Story, Christopher: "Perestroika Dec. Sutton, Anhony: Wall Street & Hitler Taylor, Captain Tony: F4J-US "Fatherless Day" Trociuk Darrell, BC Birth Registration Tyndale, William, "God's Outlaw", RIP 1536 V for Vendetta / Guy Fawkes the Hero Vellacott, MP Maurice Ventura, Jesse: Conspiracy Theory Vieira, Dr. Edwin: Fiat Empire Wagener, William Warren, Elizabeth: Collapse Middle Class Watson, Paul: EU's Nazi Origins William III & Mary II: "Bill of Rights" 1689 Wooldridge, Nancy: Canadian Grans Zepezauer, Frank: Feminist Crusades |
|
Let Ex Husbands Be Fathers Perception vs Reality Some Facts... Both Parents Vital Broken Homes, Bleak Future Justice Review Fatherneed Rights of fathers Ignored? |
|
Support one of over 50 class-actions against
unconstitutional 'sole custody' by Indiana Civl Rights
Council
thetruthandjusticefoundation.org
BC Statutory Amendments |
McKenzie & Pedersen, the "Two Robs",
Equal Parenting Bike Trek US 2006, 2007...

Robb MacKenzie Equal Parenting Bike Trek - Google Search;
Robb MacKenzie Equal Parenting Bike Trek - Google Video

Rob Pederson, Equal Parenting - Google Search;
Robert Pederson, Equal Parenting - Google Video

Cycling4Children.com
Equal Parenting Bike Trek's photostream
More:
Issues:
McKenzie & Pedersen, the "Two Robs", Equal Parenting Bike
Trek US 2006, 2007...;
Issues: Smith,
Ron: DC Family Preservation Rally, Compulsory Drugging
of Children;
Issues:
Compulsory Drugging of Children, Thymerisol; |
Beware of the "Parental Rights" IMPOSTER!!!!

"Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights"
Be on the lookout for the "Parent's
Rights" IMPOSTER. Insist on "Natural Parents Only",
please!
It comes as a big surprise to us that
many groups that present themselves as
"Parents Rights" groups REFUSE to defend the
NATURAL PARENT, and
and to demand RESTORATION
of
Natural Parents Rights taken from Canadians in the
Homosexual Marriage
legislation.

Instead their position to promote the
"rights" of a "Parent" in the widest sense of the
word, making NO distinction between
NATURAL PARENTS and
wannaabe
Legal Parents. They have bowed to
University of
Victoria's assertion that the SCC's
Trociuk
Decision
"endorses a Heterosexual View of the Family and must be
ignored", legitimizing the ongoing
Child
Trafficking by the State which views
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in
the lucrative Child
Adoption Market They refuse to be hampered by prior
obligations to that pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can
Veto an Adoption.


It appears that many
"Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United
Nations and Liberal
Irwin Cotler's assertion that the
Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent
has "NO RIGHTS",
making the State, not the Natural
Parents the Protector of the Child..
Without Cause or
Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!
More:
About:
Beware of the IMPOSTER!!!! "Natural Parent's Rights"
Vs "Parent's Rights";
News: Lessard, Hester - Heterosexual view of
Parenthood must be ignored
News: Smith,
Judge Daphne, BCSC, for Child Trafficking;
Issues: Trociuk,
Darrell;
Issues:
Child Trafficking, Canadian;
Testimonials: Rick Fredrickson of Saskatoon |
Bill Graham, Pedophile Parliamentarian & Defense
Minister


Bill Graham, mp - Google Search;
Bill Graham, mp - Google Video
Lawrence Metherel - Google Search
2007-06-19 Liberal MP Bill Graham announces
resignation
"In spite of credible revelations
dating back to April 2002 about Bill Graham, a sex addicted
bi-sexual sodomizing a 15 year old male prostitute named
Lawrence Metherel,
Paul Martin allowed Graham to remain
Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister - and eventually named
him to the portfolio of Minister of Defense.
"On Sept. 28/2005 a vote was held in Parliament to raise the
age of consent from 14 (one of the lowest age of consents in
the world) to 16 (an age which many still consider too low).
"Bill Graham, Paul Martin, and Anne
McLellan, on Sept. 28th, voted against raising the age of
consent to 16


More:
News: Graham,
Bill: Pedophile Parliamentarian, Defense Minister |


















 |
|
We apologize that the
following figures have not been developed for the Province of BC
specifically. We hope to do this over time. We do know,
however that women often move to BC from Alberta and the rest of Canada
to have their divorces done here in BC where the
misandry of the Family Courts will
maximize their powers to destroy their husbands.
Children from fatherless homes account
for:
-
63% of youth suicides. (Source: US Dept.
of Health & Human Services, Bureau of the Census).
-
71% of pregnant teenagers. (Source: US
Dept. of Health & Human Services)
-
90% of all homeless and runaway
children.
-
70% of juveniles in state-operated
institutions come from fatherless homes (Source: U.S. Dept. of
Justice, Special Report, Sept 1988)
-
85% of all children that exhibit
behavioral disorders. (Source: Center for Disease Control).
-
80% of rapists motivated with displaced
anger. (Source: Criminal Justice & Behavior, Vol. 14, p. 403-26,
1978).
-
71% of all high school dropouts.
(Source: National Principals Association Report on the State of High
Schools).
-
75% of all adolescent patients in
chemical abuse centers. (Source: Rainbows for all God's Children).
-
85% of all youths sitting in prisons.
(Source: Fulton Co. Georgia jail populations, Texas Dept. of
Corrections 1992).
Children from fatherless
homes are:
-
11 times more likely to exhibit violent
behavior than children from intact "married" homes.
-
5 times more likely to commit suicide.
-
32 times more likely to runaway.
-
20 times more likely to have behavioral
disorders.
-
14 times more likely to commit rape.
-
9 times more likely to drop out of high
school.
-
10 times more likely to abuse chemical
substances.
-
9 times more likely to end up in
state-operated institutions.
-
20 times more likely to end up in
prison.
"37.9% of
fathers have no access/visitation rights."
(Source: p.6, col.II, para. 6, lines 4 & 5, Census Bureau
P-60, #173, Sept 1991.)
"40% of mothers reported that they had interfered with the
non-custodial father's visitation on at least one occasion, to punish
the ex-spouse." (Source: p. 449, col. II, lines 3-6, (citing
Fulton) Frequency of visitation by Divorced Fathers; Differences in
Reports by Fathers and Mothers. Sanford Braver et al, Am. J. of
Orthopsychiatry, 1991.)
"Overall,
approximately 50% of mothers "see no value in the father's continued
contact with his children...."
(Source: Surviving the Breakup, Joan Kelly & Judith
Wallerstein, p. 125) Only 11% of mothers value their husband's input
when it comes to handling problems with their kids. Teachers & doctors
rated 45%, and close friends & relatives rated %16.(Source: EDK
Associates survey of 500 women for Redbook Magazine. Redbook, November
1994, p. 36)
"The former
spouse (mother) was the greatest obstacle to having more frequent
contact with the children." (Source:
Increasing our understanding of fathers who have infrequent contact with
their children, James Dudley, Family Relations, Vol. 4, p. 281, July
1991.)
"A clear
majority (70%) of fathers felt that they had too little time with their
children." (Source: Visitation and the
Noncustodial Father, Mary Ann Kock & Carol Lowery, Journal of Divorce,
Vol. 8, No. 2, p. 54, Winter 1984.)
"Very few of
the children were satisfied with the amount of contact with their
fathers, after divorce." (Source:
Visitation and the Noncustodial Father, Koch & Lowery, Journal of
Divorce and Remarriage, Vol. 8, No. 2, p. 50, Winter 1984.)
"Feelings of anger towards their former spouses hindered effective
involvement on the part of fathers; angry mothers would sometimes
sabotage father's efforts to visit their children." (Source:
Ahrons and Miller, Am. Journal of Orthopsychiatry, Vol. 63. p. 442, July
1993.)
"Mothers may
prevent visits to retaliate against fathers for problems in their
marital or post-marital relationship."
(Source: Seltzer, Shaeffer & Charing, Journal of Marriage & the Family,
Vol. 51, p. 1015, November 1989.)
In a study: "Visitational
Interference - A National Study" by Ms. J Annette Vanini, M.S.W. and
Edward Nichols, M.S.W., it was found that 77% of non-custodial fathers
are NOT able to "visit" their children, as ordered by the court, as a
result of "visitation interference" perpetuated by the custodial parent.
In other words, non-compliance with court ordered visitation is three
times the problem of non-compliance with court ordered child support and
impacts the children of divorce even more. Originally published Sept.
1992
Child Support
Information from multiple
sources show that only 10% of all non-custodial fathers fit the
"deadbeat dad" category: 90% of the fathers with joint custody paid the
support due. Fathers with visitation rights pay 79.1%; and 44.5% of
those with NO visitation rights still financially support their
children. (Source: Census Bureau report. Series P-23, No. 173).
Additionally, of those not paying support, 66% are not doing so because
they lack the financial resources to pay (Source: GAO report:
GAO/HRD-92-39 FS).
The following is sourced from: Technical Analysis Paper No. 42, U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Income Security
Policy, Authors: Meyer and Garansky.
-
Custodial mothers who receive a support
award: 79.6%
-
Custodial fathers who receive a support
award: 29.9%
-
Non-custodial mothers who totally
default on support: 46.9%
-
Non-custodial fathers who totally
default on support: 26.9%
source:
http://njlaw924.com/id39.html |
|
Judges and their elite
Star
Chamber entrench their power and status to rule over Canadians with
impunity and unbridled
narcissism.
Feminist and Homosexual Activists as Judges effect
their political agenda without the consent of the Canadian demographic.
They with full knowledge and intent (scripted in the sixties & seventies
by their Activist writers) circumvent due democratic process and
knowingly contravene the founding legal constructs of Canada in the BNA
& in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Activist Judges happily
and routinely breach the Trust placed in them by their employer, the
Canadian Taxpayer.
Lawyers routinely Entice into self-destruction and
financial rape vast numbers of families entering their doors.
Because of the Statutory self-regulation of the BC Law Society, we know
of no limiting factor to cap the Activism of the Judiciary other than
prosecuting Judges and Lawyers who exceed the powers granted them by
Statute.
The BC Law Society pimps BC women, and use them as
their hookers. With others (also conspicuously funded by the
Taxpayer), Law Society members instruct women to hook fathers and
families into the Courts and the financial ruin a "Legal Marriage"
entails. Children NEED this threat to their security to be
EXTERMINATED.
Faced with the entrenched Father Hatred and
Affirmative Action of the burgeoning civil service, boys and young men
despair. Having no vision for a Future or a university education,
they become prone to fulfill the Father Hatred prophecies of BC
university's Women's Studies faculties and Feminist Activists. |
|
2005-xx-xx Third
National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect
"Children of single parents were at
higher risk of physical abuse and of all types of neglect and were
overrepresented among seriously injured, moderately injured, and
endangered children. Compared with their counterparts living with both
parents, children in single parent families had:
-
a 77% greater risk of being
harmed by physical abuse (using the stringent Harm Standard) and a
63% greater risk of experiencing any countable physical abuse (using
the Endangerment Standard);
-
an 87% greater risk of being
harmed by physical neglect and a 165% greater risk of experiencing
any countable physical neglect;
-
a 74% greater risk of being
harmed by emotional neglect and a 64% greater risk of experiencing
any countable emotional neglect;
-
a 220% (or more than three
times) greater risk of being educationally neglected;
-
an approximately 80% greater
risk of suffering serious injury or harm from abuse or neglect;
-
an approximately 90% greater
risk of receiving moderate injury or harm as a result of child
maltreatment; and
-
a 120% (or more than two times)
greater risk of being endangered by some type of child abuse or
neglect."
|
|
2006-11-10
Top judges rebuke Tories Federal plan would allow police to help
appoint judiciary - workopolis.com; "Beverley
McLachlin, Canada's Chief Justice, along with a powerful council of
the country's top judges issued an unprecedented rebuke yesterday to
Justice Minister Vic Toews for hatching a plan to arbitrarily change
the way judges are chosen. The Canadian Judicial Council
expressed dismay that Mr. Toews is planning to introduce
"significant
changes to the composition and functioning of the Judicial Advisory
Committees," secret groups which are set up in each region to vet
candidates for the 1,100 federal judgeships across the country.
Chief Justice McLachlin, who chairs the council, urged Mr. Toews to
include the judiciary and key legal bodies in any discussion of
changes to the committee vetting process."
We
need in the very least some kind of JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY ACT
which will look something like::
-
Divide the Law Society into two groups of
Judges and Practicing Lawyers to protect the Lawyers who would
make Cases against Judges. There would be some Law Society
Members who may practice as Barristers, and some as Solicitors,
but a Judge must RETIRE from the Practice of Law and
become unable to affect the Law Society while they act as a
Judge. On removal of a Judge for
Judicial Activism,
the Law Society may deny their return to Practice from
Retirement for specified cause, such as the case made during
an unsuccessful Criminal Charge of
Breach of Trust or Treason.
-
The Judges naturally divide into two bodies,
the Provincial and Federal Judicial Societies to parallel the
Provincial and Federal Courts. Membership in both Judicial
Societies must be precluded. Federal Judges would be tried
by Provincial Judges according to the
JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY ACT, and the Provincial Judges would
be tried by the Federal Judges. They could be tried both
in Tort and in Criminal Court for
Breach of Trust and for
Treason.
-
Make Judicial Appointments for a FIXED TERM
of no more than five years (Jimmy Pattison where are you when we
need you?)
-
Judicial Re-Appointment must meet a Test for
Judicial Re-Appointment which demonstrates the prescribed
Impartiality (that is an Activism Free record.) and Non-Infamy
with the Electorate.
-
Automatic Temporary Suspension Without Pay
for a Judge who is going to Trial in Tort or in Criminal
Court, pending its outcome.
-
Eradication
of
Freemasonry from the Judiciary and Law Societies. Both
are granted special privileges by Parliamentary Statute which
they receive In Trust.. Judicial Candidates and sitting
Judges must be vetted for
Occult
practices resulting in Public Safety concerns such as
Pedophilia.
Pedophilia is an established part of Occult worship
(See
Malachi Martin among others) and is reported to be a
tolerated practice of some high ranking Judges.
-
Trial by Jury of Judges before non-allied and
non-associated Judges, e.g.. Federal
Judges
tried before Provincial Judges, visa versa..
-
NO SPECIAL
PROSECUTORS for Judges or other Public Servants being
tried.
Under the "federal" division of powers in the BNA
(Constitution Act, 1867)) Education falls into the Provincial
domain. A parallel Provincial Statute to amend the licensing
and Suspension of
Teachers
would be necessary to stop the present use of our Schools for
Political Indoctrination by Activists. See also
Four Missions |
|
Do we have any such provision? Who executes
the required actions in the event a Judge has to be removed?
Submit new info on Removal of Judges
Removal of judges from office, Oklahoma
Constitution
(a) In addition to other
methods and causes prescribed by the Constitution and laws,
the judges of any court, exercising judicial power under the
provisions of Article VII, or under any other provision, of
the Constitution of Oklahoma, shall be subject to removal
from office, or to compulsory retirement from office, for
causes herein specified, by proceedings in the Court on the
Judiciary.
(b) Cause for removal from
office shall be: Gross neglect of duty; corruption in
office; habitual drunkenness; commission while in office of
any offense involving moral turpitude;
gross partiality in office;
oppression in office; or other grounds as may be
specified hereafter by the legislature.
(c) Cause for compulsory
retirement from office, with or without compensation, shall
be mental or physical disability preventing the proper
performance of official duty, or incompetence to perform the
duties of the office" |
|
Habeas
Corpus : "literally, "you
may have the body". A Habeas
Corpus is a legal writ that protects an individual against arbitrary
imprisonment by requiring that any person arrested be brought before
a court for formal charge. If the charge is considered to be valid,
the person must submit to trial; if not, the person goes free. When
the law is suspended, then individuals can be imprisoned
indefinitely and without charge."
.....
More,
Glossary of
terms |
|
2006-03-10 The right to abandon your child by Mona Charen;
"This
is one of those moments when you want to grab liberals by the lapels
and demand, "Well, what did you expect?" ... A group called the
National Center for Men has filed a lawsuit they are calling "Roe v.
Wade for Men." ... More than three decades
ago Roe vs. Wade gave women control of their reproductive lives but
nothing in the law changed for men. Women can now have sexual
intimacy without sacrificing reproductive choice. Women now have the
freedom and security to enjoy lovemaking without the fear of forced
procreation. Women now have control of their lives after an
unplanned conception. But men are routinely forced to give up
control, forced to be financially responsible for choices only women
are permitted to make, forced to relinquish reproductive choice as
the price of intimacy."
COMMENT: Roe
V. Wade was a "Femi-Narcissistic" decision, looking after the
interests of the Mother only. The principal established there
established was extrapolated into a Mother's "murder rights"
expressed in minimal sentences when murdering their children.
Equal Parenting eliminates much of this. |
Father dealt difficult hand by the system
"Even last week, when the family court file of
Elaine and Leo Campione was released to the press -- in
significant measure because Mr. Campione didn't oppose the
media's bid to see it .. There is, to be frank, an
underlying perspective of feminist oppression from which all
else springs. .. Women are seen first as victims --
generally of male power and particularly of husband power -- and
presumed to be truth-tellers and good mothers until proven
otherwise. The starting point for men is that they are abusers
and deadbeat dads in the making unless they can prove the
contrary, and if it takes years for them to demonstrate that, oh
well."
|
| |
Joint Committee's 48 Recommendations, "For the Sake of
the Children", (FTSOTC)
|
48 Recommendations of the Joint Committee
1. This Committee recommends that the Divorce Act be amended to
include a Preamble alluding to the relevant principles of the United
Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. (page 23)*
2. This Committee recognizes that parents' relationships with
their children do not end upon separation or divorce and therefore
recommends that the Divorce Act be amended to add a Preamble
containing the principle that divorced parents and their children
are entitled to a close and continuous relationship with one
another. (page 23)
3. This Committee recommends that it is in the best interests of
children that they have the opportunity to be heard when parenting
decisions affecting them are being made; those whose parents divorce
have the opportunity to express their views to a skilled
professional, whose duty it would be to make those views known to
any judge, assessor or mediator making or facilitating a shared
parenting determination; a court have the authority to appoint an
interested third party, such as a member of the child's extended
family, to support and represent a child experiencing difficulties
during parental separation or divorce; the federal government work
with the provinces and territories to ensure that the necessary
structures, procedures and resources are in place to enable such
consultation to take place, whether decisions are being made under
the Divorce Act or provincial legislation; and we recognize that
children of divorce have a need and a right to the protection of the
courts, arising from their inherent jurisdiction. (page 23)
4. This Committee recommends that where, in the opinion of the
court, the proper protection of the best interests of the child
requires it, judges have the power to appoint legal counsel for the
child. Where such counsel is appointed, it must be provided to the
child. (page 23)
5. This Committee recommends that the terms ``custody and
access'' no longer be used in the Divorce Act and instead that the
meaning of both terms be incorporated and received in the new term
``shared parenting", which shall be taken to include all the
meanings, rights, obligations, and common-law and statutory
interpretations embodied previously in the terms ``custody and
access". (page 27)
6. This Committee recommends that the Divorce Act be amended to
repeal the definition of ``custody'' and to add a definition of
``shared parenting'' that reflects the meaning ascribed to that term
by this Committee. (page 28)
7. This Committee recommends that the federal government work
with the provinces and territories toward a corresponding change in
the terminology in provincial/territorial family law. (page 28)
8. This Committee recommends that the common law ``tender years
doctrine'' be rejected as a guide to decision making about
parenting. (page 28)
9. This Committee recommends that both parents of a child receive
information and records in respect of the child's development and
social activities, such as school records, medical records and other
relevant information. The obligation to provide such information
should extend to schools, doctors, hospitals and others generating
such information or records, as well as to both parents, unless
ordered otherwise by a court. (page 28)
10. This Committee recommends that all parents seeking parenting
orders, unless there is agreement between them on the terms of such
an order, be required to participate in an education program to help
them become aware of the post-separation reaction of parents and
children, children's developmental needs at different ages, the
benefits of cooperative parenting after divorce, parental rights and
responsibilities, and the availability and benefits of mediation and
other forms of dispute resolution, provided such programs are
available. A certificate of attendance at such a post-separation
education program would be required before the parents would be able
to proceed with their application for a parenting order. Parents
should not be required to attend sessions together (page 30).
11. This Committee recommends that divorcing parents be
encouraged to develop, on their own or with the help of a trained
mediator or through some form of alternative dispute resolution, a
parenting plan setting out details about each parent's
responsibilities for residence, care, decision making and financial
security for the children, together with the dispute resolution
process to be used by the parties. Parenting plans must also require
the sharing between parents of health, educational and other
information related to the child's development and social
activities. All parenting orders should be in the form of parenting
plans. (page 32)
12. This Committee recommends that the relationships of
grandparents, siblings and other extended family members with
children be recognized as significant and that provisions for
maintaining and fostering such relationships, where they are in the
best interests of those children, be included in parenting plans.
(page 32)
13. This Committee recommends that the Minister of Justice seek
to amend the Divorce Act to require that parties applying to a court
for a parenting order must file a proposed parenting plan with the
court. (page 32)
14. This Committee recommends that divorcing parents be
encouraged to attend at least one mediation session to help them
develop a parenting plan for their children. Recognizing the impact
of family violence on children, mediation and other non-litigation
methods of decision making should be structured to screen for and
identify family violence. Where there is a proven history of
violence by one parent toward the other or toward the children,
alternative forms of dispute resolution should be used to develop
parenting plans only when the safety of the person who has been the
victim of violence is assured and where the risk of violence has
passed. The resulting parenting plan must focus on parental
responsibilities for the children and contain measures to ensure
safety and security for parents and children. (page 33)
15. This Committee recommends that the Divorce Act be amended to
provide that shared parenting determinations under sections 16 and
17 be made on the basis of the "best interests of the child". (page
44)
16. The Committee recommends that decision makers, including
parents and judges, consider a list of criteria in determining the
best interests of the child, and that list shall include
16.1 The relative strength, nature and
stability of the relationship between the child and each
person entitled to or claiming a parenting order in
relation to the child;
16.2 The relative strength, nature and
stability of the relationship between the child and
other members of the child's family who reside with the
child, and persons involved in the care and upbringing
of the child;
16.3 The views of the child, where
such views can reasonably be ascertained;
16.4 The ability and willingness of
each applicant to provide the child with guidance and
education, the necessaries of life and any special needs
of the child;
16.5 The child's cultural ties and
religious affiliation;
16.6 The importance and benefit to the child of
shared parenting, ensuring both parents' active involvement in his
or her life after separation;
16.7 The importance of relationships between the child and the
child's siblings, grandparents and other extended family members;
16.8 The parenting plans proposed by the parents;
16.9 The ability of the child to adjust to the proposed parenting
plans;
16.10 The willingness and ability of each of the parties to facilitate
and encourage a close and continuing relationship between the child
and the other parent;
16.11 Any proven history of family violence perpetrated by any
party applying for a parenting order;
16.12 There shall be no preference in favor of either parent solely
on the basis of that parent's gender;
16.13 The willingness shown by each parent to attend the required
education session; and
16.14 Any other factor considered by the court to be relevant
to a particular shared parenting dispute. (page 45)
17. This Committee recommends that the Divorce Act be amended to
ensure that parties to proceedings under the Divorce Act can choose
to have such proceedings conducted in either of Canada's official
languages. (page 46)
18. Whereas the federal government is required by statute to review
the Federal Child Support Guidelines within five years of their
implementation, this Committee recommends that the Minister of Justice
undertake as early as possible a comprehensive review of the Guidelines
to reflect gender equality and the child's entitlement to financial
support from both parents, and to give particular attention to the
following additional concerns raised by this Committee:
18.1 Incorporation into the Child Support Guidelines of the
new
concepts and language proposed by this Committee;
18.2 The impact of the current tax treatment of child support
on the adequacy of child support as it is awarded under the Guidelines
and on parents' ability to meet other financial obligations, such
as to children of second or subsequent relationships;
18.3 The desirability of considering both parents' income, or
financial capacity, in determining child support amounts, including
the 40% rule for determining whether the parenting arrangement is
``shared parenting'';
18.4 Recognition of the expenses incurred by support payors while
caring for their children;
18.5 Recognition of the additional expenses incurred by a parent
following a relocation of the other parent with the children;
18.6 Parental contributions to the financial support of adult
children attending post-secondary institutions;
18.7 The ability of parties to contract out of the Federal Child
Support Guidelines; and
18.8 The impact of the Guidelines on the income of parties receiving
public assistance. (page 51)
19. This Committee recommends that the federal government work
with the provinces and territories toward the development of a nationwide
coordinated response to failures to respect parenting orders, involving
both therapeutic and punitive elements. Measures should include
early
intervention, parenting education programs, a make-up time policy,
counseling for families experiencing parenting disputes, mediation
and, for persistent intractable cases, punitive solutions for parents
who wrongfully disobey parenting orders. (page 55)
20. This Committee recommends that the federal government
establish
a national computerized registry of shared parenting orders. (page
55)
21. This Committee recommends that the provincial and territorial
governments consider amending their family law to provide that maintaining
and fostering relationships with grandparents and other extended
family members is in the best interests of children and that such
relationships should
not be disrupted without a significant reason related to the well-being
of the child. (page 57)
22. This Committee recommends that the federal government provide
leadership by ensuring that adequate resources are secured for the
following initiatives identified by this Committee as critical to
the effort to develop a more child-centred approach to family law
policies and practices:
22.1 Expansion of unified family courts across Canada, including
the dedication of ample resources to interventions and programs
aimed at ensuring compliance with parenting orders, such as early
intervention programs, parenting education, make-up time policies,
family and child counseling, and mediation;
22.2 Civil legal aid to ensure that parties to contested parenting
applications are not prejudiced by the lack or inadequacy of legal
representation;
22.3 A Children's Commissioner, an officer of Parliament reporting
to Parliament, who would superintend and promote the welfare and
best interests of children under the Divorce Act and in other areas
of federal responsibility;
22.4 The provision of legal representation for children when appointed
by a judge;
22.5 Parenting education programs;
22.6 Supervised access programs; and
22.7 Enhanced opportunities for professional development for judges,
focused on the concept of shared parenting formulated by this Committee,
the impact of divorce on children, and the importance of maintaining
relationships between children and their parents and extended family
members. (page 59)
23. This Committee recommends that the federal government continue
to work with the provinces and territories to accelerate the establishment
of unified family courts, or courts of a similar nature, in all
judicial districts across Canada. (page 63)
24. This Committee recommends that unified family courts, in addition
to their adjudicative function, include a broad range of non-litigation
support services, which might include
24.1 family and child counseling,
24.2 public legal education,
24.3 parenting assessment and mediation services,
24.4 an office responsible for hearing and supporting children
who are experiencing difficulties stemming from parental separation
or
divorce, and
24.5 case management services, including monitoring the implementation
and enforcement of shared parenting orders. (page 64)
25. This Committee recommends that, as much as possible, provincial
and territorial governments, law societies and court administrators
work toward establishing a priority for shared parenting applications,
above other family law matters in dispute. (page 64)
26. This Committee recommends that in matters relating to parenting
under the Divorce Act, the importance of the presence of both parties
at any proceeding be recognized and emphasized, and that reliance
on ex parte proceedings be restricted as much as possible. (page
64)27. This Committee recommends that court orders respecting shared
parenting be more detailed, readable and intelligible to police
officers called upon to enforce them. (page 67)
28. This Committee recommends that provincial and territorial governments
explore a variety of vehicles for increasing public awareness about
the impact of divorce on children and, in particular, the aspects
of parental conduct upon marriage breakdown that are most harmful
to children,
and implement such education programs as fully as possible. To the
extent practicable, the Committee recommends that the federal government
contribute to such efforts within its own jurisdiction, including
the provision of funding. (page 68)
29. This Committee recommends that the federal government extend
financial support to programs run by community groups for couples
wanting to avoid separation and divorce or seeking to strengthen
their marital relationship. (page 68)
30. This Committee recommends that the Divorce Act be amended to
require (a) that a parent wishing to relocate with a child, where
the distance would necessitate the modification of agreed or court-ordered
parenting arrangements, seek judicial permission at least 90 days
before the
proposed move and (b) that the other parent be given notice at the
same time. (page 70)
31. This Committee recommends that provinces and territories and
the relevant professional associations develop accreditation criteria
for family mediators and for social workers and psychologists involved
in shared parenting assessments. (page 72)
32. This Committee recommends that federal, provincial and territorial
governments work together to encourage the development of effective
models for the early identification of high-conflict families seeking
divorce. Such families should be streamed into a specialized, expedited
process and offered services designed to improve outcomes for their
children. (page 74)
33. This Committee recommends that professionals who meet with
children experiencing parental separation recognize that a child's
wish not to have contact with a parent could reveal a significant
problem and should result in the immediate referral of the family
for therapeutic intervention.
(page 74)
34. This Committee recommends that the federal, provincial and
territorial governments work together to ensure the availability
of supervised parenting programs to serve Canadians in every part
of Canada. (page 76)
35. This Committee recommends that the Divorce Act be amended to
make explicit provision for the granting of supervised parenting
orders where necessary to ensure continuing contact between a parent
and a child in situations of transition, or where there is clear
evidence that the child
requires protection. (page 76)
36. This Committee recommends that the provincial and territorial
governments require child protection agencies to provide disclosure
of records of investigations to court-appointed assessors examining
families who have been the subject of such investigations. (page
77)
37. This Committee recommends that the attorneys general of Canada
and the provinces, along with police forces and police organizations,
ensure that all warrants in child abduction matters provide expressly
that their application and enforcement are national. (page 84)
38. This Committee recommends that the Attorney General of Canada
work to develop a co-ordinated national response to the problem
of child abduction within Canada. (page 84)
39. This Committee recommends that the unilateral removal of a
child from the family home without suitable arrangements for contact
between the child and the other parent be recognized as contrary
to the best interests of the child, except in an emergency. (page
84)
40. This Committee recommends that a parent who has unilaterally
removed a child not be permitted to rely on the resulting period
of sole care and control of the child, of whatever duration, as
the basis for a sole parenting order. (page 84)
41. This Committee recommends that the federal government implement
the recommendations of the Sub-Committee on Human Rights and International
Development of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Foreign
Affairs and International Trade entitled International Child
Abduction: Issues for Reform. (page 84)
42. This Committee recommends that the Minister of Foreign Affairs
and the Passport Office continue to examine ways to improve the
identification of minor children in travel documents and consider
further the advisability of requiring that all children be issued
individual passports. (page 84)
43. This Committee recommends that, to deal with intentional false
accusations of abuse or neglect, the federal government assess the
adequacy of the Criminal Code in dealing with false statements in
family law matters and develop policies to promote action on clear
cases of mischief,
obstruction of justice or perjury. (page 90)
44. This Committee recommends that the federal government work
with the provinces and territories to encourage child welfare agencies
to track investigations of allegations of abuse made in the context
of parenting disputes, in order to provide a statistical basis for
a better understanding of
this problem. (page 93)
45. This Committee recommends that the federal government engage
in further consultation with Aboriginal organizations and communities
across Canada about issues related to shared parenting that are
particular to those communities, with a view to developing a clear
plan of action to be
implemented in a timely way. (page 97)
46. This Committee recommends that the federal government include
as the basis for such consultations the family law-related recommendations
of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples and work toward their
implementation as appropriate. (page 98)
47. This Committee recommends that sexual orientation not be considered
a negative factor in the disposition of shared parenting decisions.
(page
99)
48. This Committee recommends that the Minister of Foreign Affairs
work toward the signing and ratification as soon as possible of
the 1996 Hague Convention on Jurisdiction, Law Applicable, Recognition,
Enforcement and Cooperation in Respect of Parental Responsibility
and Measures for the Protection of Children. (page 101)
|
|
Joint Committee's 48 Recommendations, "For the Sake of
the Children", (FTSOTC
|
|

Anne Cools - Google Search

Anne Cools' Website
Anne
Cools on False Accusations
EP Nemesis,
Liberal Hedy Fry, the Queen of FALSE ACCUSERS
"Honourable
senators know that I have studied a terrible and pernicious
heart of darkness that has developed in our court system, being
the use of
FALSE ACCUSATIONS in civil justice.
This is the
mischief of litigating parties, usually mothers, suddenly within
the context of divorce and within child custody proceedings
falsely accusing the other party, usually fathers, of the sexual
abuse of their own children. ,,,
These
FALSE ALLEGATIONS are often made with the overt or
covert complicity of their lawyers. They are a lethal weapon in
the business of parental alienation. They are a tool for
achieving sole custody of children and creating fatherlessness."
Identified Issue: Canadian Law Societies' General Failure to
Self Regulate, Members permitted to Lie in Court, Anne Cools'
Bill 2-12 provides an answer
2004-06-08 SENATOR ANNE COOLS LEAVES LIBERAL FOLD TO JOIN
Senator Anne Cools Runs Away With The Suns's 10 Top Women Poll,
Kevin Connor, TO Sun
2004-06-08 Liberal senator < Anne Cools > goes
Conservative
1997-10-28 Child Custody and Access Reform, Special Joint
Committee Established
More:
Issues: Cools, Senator
Anne
Issues:
False Accusations;
Isues Womens Shelters' Scam
Issues:Senator Anne Cools
News: Liberal Hedy Fry /
Status of Women (SOW):
Issues: Pedophiles Fear Dads |
Equal Parenting How To's

Equal Parenting is like a Three Layer Cake.
1.
The Bottom Layer: The Initial Equal Parenting Agreement
Initial Equal Parenting Agreement creating full time, all time
equality of both natural parents, subordinate to no third parties (a
Constitutional right ignored by most Family Courts); a series of
tentative
Parenting Timetables for each year and statement of intent, or
"Wishes"; the requirement that the tentative Parenting Timetable laid
out there will be reviewed and finalized annually and incorporated into
the
Annual Parenting Supplement. Parental authority and discretion
is always equal and unaffected by inequalities of Parenting Time
allocations.
2.
Middle Layer: The Annual Supplement
Yearly
Annual Parenting Supplements for planning the school year and
finalizing the
Parenting Timetable for the upcoming parenting year.
Parenting Timetable must meet the test for equality established in
1) the initial Equal Parenting Agreement.
3.
Top Layer: Autonomy of Both Equal Parents on all matters not
previously Constrained.
Parenting Timetable alternates all residual parenting questions
between the two otherwise equal parents who are subordinate to no third
parties. Full autonomy of each parent during their Parenting Time
as allotted in the agreed Parenting Timetable on all residual parenting
questions not previously constrained by Covenants in the initial Equal
Parenting Agreement, or the current Annual Parenting Supplement.
Full discretion on residual parenting with the Timetabled Parent, but
flexibility encouraged and provided by Ad Hoc Agreements.
4.
Icing on the Cake.....
Forget about the Courts and your Ex, and go have fun with your kids!!!
More:
About:
Equal Parenting How To's: Three Layer Cake;
About:
Grandparents in Equal Parenting;
About: EPR =
Equal Parenting Roundups;
About: EPT = Equal Parenting
Trek;
EP
Trek Generic Calendar
|
|
|