Issues Area Home
1215: MAGNA CARTA, JUNE 15TH
Abortion Veto for Dads
Adoption Veto for Dads
Adopted Children Disallowed NPs
Age Of Consent
Anti-Depressants, Drug Induced Suicide
Battered Woman Syndrome
BC Vital Statistics Act Misandry
BC Legislature MUST
Big Brother, Micro-Management
Birth Rate Displacement
"Best interests of the Child" = "Blank Cheque"
Breach of Trust
Carbon Tax funds Global Government
"Case Law" is NOT Law
CCA Wood and Playgrounds
Child Support Tables / SOW Fraud
"Child's Right" or "Parents' Right"
Child & Human Trafficking righs of CBA
Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges
Compulsory Drugging of Children
Court Ordered Sexism
Credit Crisis, Currency Replacment
Custody Orders not Enforced
Debtor's Prison Reinstituted
Day Care Universal
Deadbeat Dad Propaganda
DISS = Divorce Initiated Suicide Synd.
Domestic Violence Propaganda
Division of Assets
Enticement Seduction Tort Claims Precluded
Estate Taxes Thieve a Child's Inheritance
EU = European Union: Nazi Brainchild
Ex Parte Orders
Father Hatred Propaganda
Fatherlessness, State Imposed
Federal Reserve / Fiat Currency
FEMA Camps, Martial Law
Feminism = Socialism = Nazism
Fitness Test for Natural Parents in Divorce
Fitness Test for Students: "Transitions"
FMEP = Family Maintenance Enforcement
Forgiveness is NOT Compulsory
Franklin Scandal, Conspiracy of Silence
Freedom of Speech
Friendly Parent Rule, Max. Contact
Glass-Steagall Act Repealed
Globalism is Treason
Habeas Corpus Abandoned
"Hate Crime" Speech Police
HELP = Human Early Learning Partnerships
Homosexual Activism, Gay Manifesto
"Human Rights” Commissions in Canada
Imputed Income: Fraudulent CS Orders
Inheritance Theft: Grey & Black Widow
Judicial Accountability, Removal of Judges
Judicial Activism is Breach of Trust
Judicial Falsification of Court Transcripts
Judicial Freemasonry is Racketeering
Judicial Globalization is Treason
Judicial Racketeering, Law Societies' Rackets
Kinship Families / Grandparents
Lawyers in the Legislatures
Lawyers Lying in Court, Self Regulation Fail
Legal Abuse Syndrome
Letters to MP
Letters to MLA
Letters to Editor
Lisbon Treaty (2007) is Treason
Malicious Mother Syndrome
Misandry = Hatred of Males
Monetary Crisis: "Money as Debt"
Natural Parents Rights Eliminated, SSM
NAU = North American Union
NDP = "No Dads Party"
Net Neutrality: Keep Internet Free!!
No Fault Divorce
NCR = Not Criminally Responsible
Parental Authority Usurped by Teachers..
Parenting Time Presumption
Passport & DL Removal
Paternity Denied, Birth Registration
Paternity Fraud, Birth Registration
Pedophiles Fear Dads New
Pedophiles in Public Service
Protestant Revolution, BBC
PPP = Public Private Partnerships, Public Assets
QE = Quantitative Easing
Sexual Abuse by a Public Officer
Sex Change Surgery
Sole Custody is Child Abuse
Special Prosecutors for Homo's & Judges
Star Chamber's Secret Overlords
SOW = Status of Women, KILL IT!!!!
Stockholm Syndrome Paradigm Shift
Straw Man Redemption, Free Man
Supremacy of Parliament
Teachers displacing Parents
Teachers Seducing Students
Tracts and Flyers
Treasonous Public Officers not Prosecuted
Transcripts & Documents altered by Judges
UNCRC = UN Convention..Rights of the Child
Uptick Rule Repealed 2007
"Women's Shelters" = Lesbian Gulags
Albrecht, Katherine : RFID Spychips
Alexander, Rachel: Shared Parenting
Annett, Kevin: Child Trafficking in BC
Baskerville, Stephen: "Taken .. Custody
Beatley, Terry: UNCRC Vs Parental Rights
Baxter, Dorian: Canada Courtwatch
Beck, Glenn Beck: World Government
Bennett, Richard: Purpose Driven Church
Blick, Edward: Global Warming & Marxism
Blumner,Court Ordered Sexism
Briffault, Robert: Briffault's Law
Burrows, Lynette: Homo Adoption
Caradori, Gary: Franklin Cover-up Investigator
Carley, Dr. Rebecca: Vaccinations
Carr, William Guy: Pawns in the Game
Christie, Doug: Freedom of Speech
Chopra, Dr. Shiv: Health Canada
Clarke, Christine: BC Conservatives
Clifford Dean: Freeman
Coulter, Ann: Free Speech
Cools, Senator Anne: Lying Lawyers
Coffman, Dr. Michael: Global Warming
Coleman, John: Global Warming Fraud
Coleman, Dr. John (MI6) Comittee of 300
Coren, Michael: Islamophobia, Homophobia
Crane, Ian: Codex Alimentarius Scam
Cromwell, Oliver: Supremacy / Parliament
Cuddy, Dennis L. "Power Elite"
Cumbey, Constance : New Age Nazism
Cummins, John: BC Conservative Party
Decamp, John: Franklin Cover-up
Delaney, Chris : "No HST in BC!"
Dioguardi, Joe: Saving US / Debtors' Prison
Dodd, Norman: NWO Fabian Socialists
Duane, James:"Don't Talk to Police"
Dutton, Don: RADAR, "Rethinking DV"
Estulin, Daniel: Bilderberg Group
Evans, Stanton: "Blacklisted, Joe McCarthy"
Farage, Nigel: UKIP, EU Titanic
Farrell, Warren: Why Men Earn More
Federer, Bill: Endang'd Speeches, Quran
Fischer, Greg: Family Preservation Festival
Fogal, Connie: No NAU
Forseth, MP Paul: FTSOTC Panelist
Fromm, Paul: Free Speech, CAFE
Gage, Richard: Architects & Engineers 9/11
Galloway, Roger: FTSOTC Panelist
Geldof, Sir Bob: The Love..
Gerrish, Brian: EU's "Common Purpose"
Griffin, G. Edward: Fed Reserve
Grignon, Paul: "Money As Debt"
Gunderson, Ted: FBI, Protected Pedophiles
Haeck, Lisa: Sexual Abuse
Haines, Bruce, QC: Justice Review
Hein, Arnie: "Cross My Heart" EP Trek 2005
Hiebert, MP Russ: Human Rights Commission
Hill, MP Jay: EP Legislation
Hinton , Betty: Status of Women's "Hit List"
Holland, Lary: "GET OFF THE BENCH"
Horowitz, David: Islamofacism, Universites
Hunt, Dave: Woman / Beast
Iserbyt, Charlotte: Dumbing Down
Kah, Gary: Obama, Vatican, Globalization
Kay, Barbara, National Post
Kennedy, John F: Assassination 1963
Kernberg, Dr. Otto: Personality Disorder
Kerkman, Larry : CRISPE
Keyes, Alan :
Khodeir, Lucien: Child-Support Guidelines
Knight, Robert: Obama's "Radical Rulers"
Kruk, Edward: Child Custody
Lafantaisie, Michele: CAS, CCA wood
Leslie, Sarah: "Pied Pipers of Purpose"
Levant, Ezra: HRT, Islam, Freedom of Speech
LInde, Carey: Statutory Ammendments
Lively, Scott: "Pink Swastika"
Loftus, Elizabeth: Recovered Memories Myth
Luther, Martin: "Sola Scriptura"
Macdonald, Peter: "Taxcap" limits Debt
Machon, Annie: Ex-MI5
Makow , Henry PhD: "Save the Males"
Man, Woman, & Myth
Matrisciana, Caryl: Islam Rising, FITNA
Martin, Malachi: Globalization, Occult
McManus, John: Stopping NAU
McKay, Dr. Marty
MacKenzie, Rob: EP Trek 2006
Menard, Robert: "Bursting Bubbles"
McQuaid, Robert: Fix CAS
Mills, Dennis: MP Targetted by Homsexuals
Monckton, Lord Christopher
Monarchy, David Starkey
Monteith, Dr. Stanley: Aides / Luciferians
Morris, Dick: G-20 Vs US Sovereignty
Murtari, John: NCP Hunger Striker
Nash, Dave: Cross Canada Run
Nazanin: Persian Beauty for a Free Iran
Neufeld, Gordon: Hold - Kids
Nicholson, Robert: BC's Protected Pedophiles
Nicolosi, Joseph: Homosexuality
Norton, Bob: Family Court Watcher
O'Connor, Matt: Original F4J-UK
PAFE = Planetary Alliance, Fathers in Exile
Paul, Dr. Ron: Sound Money
Peck, Dr. Scott: "People of the Lie"
Pedersen, Rob: EP Bike Trek US, 2007
Pellman, Adrian, LLB: Judicial Activism
Perloff, James: Shadows of Power
Phenomenon: The Lost Archives
Pizzey, Erin: Women's Shelter Scam
Plywood Man, NWT
Protestant Revolution, BBC
Quigley, Carroll: Banking, Globalization
Rhodes, Carol: Child Support
Riplinger, Gail: Luciferian Bibles
Roberts, Elise: False Allegation of Abuse
Roscoe, Peter: Judicial Bigotry
Russo, Aaron: NAU, CFR, Rockefellers
Ruppert, Michael C
Saburido, Jacqueline: Don't Drink
Secret Files of the Inquisition
Schlafly, Phyllis: Global Governance
Simons, Frank: Courts From Hell
Schafer, Nancy: Child Trafficking at CPS
Schiff, Peter: Currency Crisis, Debt Ceiling
Shafarevich, Igor: The Socialist Phenomenon
Short, David: St. John's Anglican
Shrimpton, Michael , QC: Intelligence
Shrout, Winston: Common Law
Silverman, Earl: Domestic Abuse against Men
SJCA - FTSOTC 48 Recom's
Simpson, Kari: Road Kill Radio
Smith, Dr. Helen, "Men on Strike"
Smith, Ron: DC Rally, Drugging of Children
Soever, Alar: SOW's Child Support Fraud
Somerville, Margaret:“Same-Sex Marriage”
Still, Bill: "Money Masters", "Mystery of Oz"
Stopps, Gordon Vs Just Ladies, BCHRT
Stormer, John: Betrayed .. Bench
Story, Christopher: "Perestroika Dec.
Sutton, Anhony: Wall Street & Hitler
Taylor, Captain Tony: "Fatherless Day"
Trociuk Darrell, BC Birth Registration
Tyndale, William, "God's Outlaw", RIP 1536
V for Vendetta / Guy Fawkes the Hero
van Gogh, Theo: Islamic Violence, RIP 2005
Vellacott, MP Maurice
Ventura, Jesse: Conspiracy Theory
Vieira, Dr. Edwin: Fiat Empire
Wallace, Tom: Sharia Law in UK & US
Warren, Elizabeth: Collapse Middle Class
Watson, Paul: EU's Nazi Origins
Wilberforce, William: Slave Trade Act, 1807
William III & Mary II: "Bill of Rights" 1689
Wooldridge, Nancy: Canadian Grans
World, Gordon: Sexualizing BC Children
Youth Protecting Youth (YPY), UVic
Zepezauer, Frank: Feminist Crusades
Let Ex Husbands Be Fathers
Perception vs Reality
Both Parents Vital
Broken Homes, Bleak Future
Rights of fathers Ignored?
Support one of over 50 class-actions against
unconstitutional 'sole custody' by Indiana Civl Rights
BC Statutory Amendments
Senator Anne Cools, FTSOTC Chair on False
Accusations & Lying Lawyers
Senator Anne Cools, formerly
Liberal, now Conservative, on
False Accusations &
to Lie in Court
"'.. mothers and fathers should have equal rights in
the raising of their children, regardless of marital break
Anne Cools - Google Search
Anne Cools - Google Video
Canadian Bill s-12, senator cools - Google Search
senators know that I have studied a terrible and pernicious
heart of darkness
that has developed in our court system, being the use of
FALSE ACCUSATIONS in civil justice.
is the mischief of litigating parties, usually mothers,
suddenly within the context of divorce and within child
custody proceedings falsely accusing the other party,
usually fathers, of the sexual abuse of their own children.
FALSE ACCUSATIONS are often made with the overt
or covert complicity of their
lawyers. They are a
lethal weapon in the business of parental alienation. They
are a tool for achieving sole custody of children and
2004-06-08 SENATOR ANNE COOLS LEAVES LIBERAL FOLD TO
Senator Anne Cools Runs Away With The Suns's 10 Top Women
Poll, Kevin Connor, TO Sun
2004-06-08 Liberal senator < Anne Cools > goes
1997-10-28 Child Custody and Access Reform, Special Joint
Issues: False Accusations;
Isues Women's Shelters'
Liberal Hedy Fry / Status of Women (SOW):
Pamela:Feminist Law: Female Accusers must not be
required to face those they accuse of Violence;
Domestic Violence Scam & "Women's Studies" Propaganda
Issues: Pizzey, Erin:
Women's Shelter Scam;
"Women's Shelter" Gulags: Lesbian Brainwashing &
Cools, Senator Anne: Lying Lawyers;
Hedy Fry / Status of Women (SOW):
Trafficking by Public Officers & Judges
McKenzie & Pedersen, the "Two Robs",
Equal Parenting Bike Trek US 2006, 2007...
Robb MacKenzie Equal Parenting Bike Trek - Google Search;
Robb MacKenzie Equal Parenting Bike Trek - Google Video
Rob Pederson, Equal Parenting - Google Search;
Robert Pederson, Equal Parenting - Google Video
Equal Parenting Bike Trek's photostream
McKenzie & Pedersen, the "Two Robs", Equal Parenting Bike
Trek US 2006, 2007...;
Ron: DC Family Preservation Rally, Compulsory Drugging
Compulsory Drugging of Children, Thymerisol;
Beware of the "Parental Rights" IMPOSTER!!!!
"Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights"
Be on the lookout for the "Parent's
Rights" IMPOSTER. Insist on "Natural Parents Only",
It comes as a big surprise to us that
many groups that present themselves as
"Parents Rights" groups REFUSE to defend the
NATURAL PARENT, and
and to demand RESTORATION
Natural Parents Rights taken from Canadians in the
Instead their position to promote the
"rights" of a "Parent" in the widest sense of the
word, making NO distinction between
NATURAL PARENTS and
Legal Parents. They have bowed to
Victoria's assertion that the SCC's
"endorses a Heterosexual View of the Family and must be
ignored", legitimizing the ongoing
by the State which views
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in
the lucrative Child
Adoption Market They refuse to be hampered by prior
obligations to that pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can
Veto an Adoption.
It appears that many
"Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United
Nations and Liberal
Irwin Cotler's assertion that the
Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent
has "NO RIGHTS",
making the State, not the Natural
Parents the Protector of the Child..
Without Cause or
Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!
Beware of the IMPOSTER!!!! "Natural Parent's Rights"
Vs "Parent's Rights";
News: Lessard, Hester - Heterosexual view of
Parenthood must be ignored
Judge Daphne, BCSC, for Child Trafficking;
Testimonials: Rick Fredrickson of Saskatoon
Bill Graham, Liberal <Pedophile> Leader & Defense
Bill Graham, mp - Google Search;
Bill Graham, mp - Google Video
Lawrence Metherel - Google Search
2007-06-19 Liberal MP Bill Graham announces
"In spite of credible revelations dating back to April 2002
about Bill Graham, a sex addicted bi-sexual sodomizing a 15
year old male prostitute named
Paul Martin allowed Graham to remain
Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister - and eventually named
him to the portfolio of Minister of Defense.
"On Sept. 28/2005 a vote was held in Parliament to raise the
age of consent from 14 (one of the lowest age of consents in
the world) to 16 (an age which many still consider too low).
"Bill Graham, Paul Martin, and Anne McLellan, on Sept. 28th,
voted against raising the age of consent to 16
Bill: Pedophile Parliamentarian, Defense Minister
Corpus : "literally, "you
may have the body". A Habeas
Corpus is a legal writ that protects an individual against arbitrary
imprisonment by requiring that any person arrested be brought before
a court for formal charge. If the charge is considered to be valid,
the person must submit to trial; if not, the person goes free. When
the law is suspended, then individuals can be imprisoned
indefinitely and without charge."
Skeletons in the Closet, a film drawn from the dramatized lives
of families living with a protected
Pedophile and the mental
illness it may create when a loving, faithful, Victim keeps the
Secret. This is shockingly
common. The Secret is their Power -
(You would be well advised to stay away from the Public Servant.)
FYI, most of what you hear
about Family Violence is a huge fraud because
World Health Organization
obligates members to:
a) NOT report results of studies which do
not show "expected results", and
b) if "unexpected results do eventually get
reported, they may only be reported with "expert" commentary to
explain away the deviation from the expected result that "Men are
violent" and "Women are their Victims".
The World Health has as a primary Sponsor, the
Rockefeller Foundations, a
Fabian Socialist group
which has as it's aim the conversion of the West to a Soviet style
block which can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.
See Norman Dodd.
What Is Gendercide?
Opponents of Equal Parenting like to tell you
that seventy something percent of Custody Cases don't go to Trial,
and are awarded as Sole Custody to Mom BY CONSENT.
What they don't tell you is that in ninety
something percent of Custody Cases that do go to Trial Mom gets Sole
Custody anyway, and Dad has to pay on top of his Lawyer fees, the
Court Costs for having lost his Application. Faced with these
abysmal odds, Dads are commonly told to "Just give her what she
wants so you can have a good relationship with her". Under
Duress many Dads foolishly acquiesce .... for
a time at least......
We prefer that Natural Parents NOT sign a Consent
Order that is not completely Equal with respect to Gender, as the
relationship of the divorced couple is greatly destabilized with
each injury to the equality of parental powers .
Teacher-Student sex rules being relaxed by BCSC;
Abuse by a Public Officer
Pedophile Activists obviously don't go around
telling you what they're up to. Instead they call
themselves "Mentors", "Social
Workers", "Feminists" or "Homosexual Rights Activists". In
Canada, Pedophile Activists have been successful in getting
greater access to children by reducing the
of Consent to
and in eliminating a parents "right to know" when the child reaches
the age of
replacing them with school counselors and
Social Workers, and by, of course, eradicating fathers from
their children's lives entirely from birth on request by the mother.
the recent changes to accommodate homosexual marriage, the right of
natural parents to "parent" their natural children will soon be
removed entirely. Through these statutory changes, the term
"LEGAL PARENT" is replacing the
historic term "NATURAL PARENT"
in Canadian statutes. As a result
Parents can no longer automatically claim to be the Legal Parents of
their own natural children at birth. Instead, to accommodate
the Homosexual Activists' plan to push Natural Parents aside when it
comes to parenting children, the Courts alone now decide who will be
the "parents' of all children born in Canada.
Activists are often lawyers, school counselors, teachers,
Social Workers, Sex Ed teachers,
pastors, Judges, etc. etc. They seek positions with access and
power over Children & Families, and positions to create social and
political change. The publicly undisclosed prevalence of
Pedophile & Homosexual Activists in our civil service has been
attributed to their determined politicism in the many groups like
ACT UP! , the secrecy of the
alliances made in various "secret societies" and sex clubs, and to
Sexual Nepotism in the workplace.
Lord Christopher Monckton:
Gore's Global Warming Fraud
Climate chaos? Don't believe it, Lord Christopher Monckton,
05 Nov 2006
2006-11-05 Climate chaos? Don't believe it, Lord
Last week, Gordon Brown and his chief
economist both said global warming was the worst "market
failure" ever. That loaded soundbite suggests that the
"climate-change" scare is less about saving the planet than, in
Jacques Chirac's chilling phrase, "creating world government".
This week and next, I'll reveal how politicians, scientists and
bureaucrats contrived a threat of Biblical floods, droughts,
plagues, and extinctions worthier of St John the Divine than of
Sir Nicholas Stern's report on the economics of climate change,
which was published last week, says that the debate is over. It
isn't. There are more greenhouse gases in the air than there
were, so the world should warm a bit, but that's as far as the
"consensus" goes. After the recent hysteria, you may not find
the truth easy to believe. So you can find all my references and
detailed calculations here.
The Royal Society says there's a worldwide scientific consensus.
It brands Apocalypse-deniers as paid lackeys of coal and oil
corporations. I declare my interest: I once took the taxpayer's
shilling and advised Margaret Thatcher, FRS, on scientific scams
and scares. Alas, not a red cent from Exxon.
In 1988, James Hansen, a climatologist, told the US Congress
that temperature would rise 0.3C by the end of the century (it
rose 0.1C), and that sea level would rise several feet (no, one
inch). The UN set up a transnational bureaucracy, the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The UK
taxpayer unwittingly meets the entire cost of its scientific
team, which, in 2001, produced the Third Assessment Report, a
Bible-length document presenting apocalyptic conclusions well
beyond previous reports.
This week, I'll show how the UN undervalued the sun's effects on
historical and contemporary climate, slashed the natural
greenhouse effect, overstated the past century's temperature
increase, repealed a fundamental law of physics and tripled the
man-made greenhouse effect.
Next week, I'll demonstrate the atrocious economic, political
and environmental cost of the high-tax, zero-freedom,
bureaucratic centralism implicit in Stern's report; I'll compare
the global-warming scare with previous sci-fi alarums; and I'll
show how the environmentalists' "precautionary principle" (get
the state to interfere now, just in case) is killing people.
So to the scare. First, the UN implies that carbon dioxide ended
the last four ice ages. It displays two 450,000-year graphs: a
sawtooth curve of temperature and a sawtooth of airborne CO2
that's scaled to look similar. Usually, similar curves are
superimposed for comparison. The UN didn't do that. If it had,
the truth would have shown: the changes in temperature preceded
the changes in CO2 levels.
Next, the UN abolished the medieval warm period (the global
warming at the end of the First Millennium AD). In 1995, David
Deming, a geoscientist at the University of Oklahoma, had
written an article reconstructing 150 years of North American
temperatures from borehole data. He later wrote: "With the
publication of the article in Science, I gained significant
credibility in the community of scientists working on climate
change. They thought I was one of them, someone who would
pervert science in the service of social and political causes.
One of them let his guard down. A major person working in the
area of climate change and global warming sent me an astonishing
email that said: 'We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm
So they did. The UN's second assessment report, in 1996, showed
a 1,000-year graph demonstrating that temperature in the Middle
Ages was warmer than today. But the 2001 report contained a new
graph showing no medieval warm period. It wrongly concluded that
the 20th century was the warmest for 1,000 years. The graph
looked like an ice hockey-stick. The wrongly flat AD1000-AD1900
temperature line was the shaft: the uptick from 1900 to 2000 was
the blade. Here's how they did it:
• They gave one technique for reconstructing pre-thermometer
temperature 390 times more weight than any other (but didn't say
• The technique they overweighted was one which the UN's 1996
report had said was unsafe: measurement of tree-rings from
bristlecone pines. Tree-rings are wider in warmer years, but
pine-rings are also wider when there's more carbon dioxide in
the air: it's plant food. This carbon dioxide fertilisation
distorts the calculations.
• They said they had included 24 data sets going back to 1400.
Without saying so, they left out the set showing the medieval
warm period, tucking it into a folder marked "Censored Data".
• They used a computer model to draw the graph from the data,
but scientists later found that the model almost always drew
hockey-sticks even if they fed in random, electronic "red
The large, full-colour "hockey-stick" was the key graph in the
UN's 2001 report, and the only one to appear six times. The
Canadian Government copied it to every household. Four years
passed before a leading scientific journal would publish the
truth about the graph. Did the UN or the Canadian government
apologise? Of course not. The UN still uses the graph in its
Even after the "hockey stick" graph was exposed, scientific
papers apparently confirming its abolition of the medieval warm
period appeared. The US Senate asked independent statisticians
to investigate. They found that the graph was meretricious, and
that known associates of the scientists who had compiled it had
written many of the papers supporting its conclusion.
The UN, echoed by Stern, says the graph isn't important. It is.
Scores of scientific papers show that the medieval warm period
was real, global and up to 3C warmer than now. Then, there were
no glaciers in the tropical Andes: today they're there. There
were Viking farms in Greenland: now they're under permafrost.
There was little ice at the North Pole: a Chinese naval squadron
sailed right round the Arctic in 1421 and found none.
The Antarctic, which holds 90 per cent of the world's ice and
nearly all its 160,000 glaciers, has cooled and gained ice-mass
in the past 30 years, reversing a 6,000-year melting trend. Data
from 6,000 boreholes worldwide show global temperatures were
higher in the Middle Ages than now. And the snows of Kilimanjaro
are vanishing not because summit temperature is rising (it
isn't) but because post-colonial deforestation has dried the
air. Al Gore please note.
In some places it was also warmer than now in the Bronze Age and
in Roman times. It wasn't CO2 that caused those warm periods. It
was the sun. So the UN adjusted the maths and all but
extinguished the sun's role in today's warming. Here's how:
• The UN dated its list of "forcings" (influences on
temperature) from 1750, when the sun, and consequently air
temperature, was almost as warm as now. But its start-date for
the increase in world temperature was 1900, when the sun, and
temperature, were much cooler.
• Every "forcing" produces "climate feedbacks" making
temperature rise faster. For instance, as temperature rises in
response to a forcing, the air carries more water vapour, the
most important greenhouse gas; and polar ice melts, increasing
heat absorption. Up goes the temperature again. The UN more than
doubled the base forcings from greenhouse gases to allow for
climate feedbacks. It didn't do the same for the base solar
Two centuries ago, the astronomer William Herschel was reading
Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations when he noticed that quoted grain
prices fell when the number of sunspots rose. Gales of laughter
ensued, but he was right. At solar maxima, when the sun was at
its hottest and sunspots showed, temperature was warmer, grain
grew faster and prices fell. Such observations show that even
small solar changes affect climate detectably. But recent solar
changes have been big.
Sami Solanki, a solar physicist, says that in the past
half-century the sun has been warmer, for longer, than at any
time in at least the past 11,400 years, contributing a base
forcing equivalent to a quarter of the past century's warming.
That's before adding climate feedbacks.
The UN expresses its heat-energy forcings in watts per square
metre per second. It estimates that the sun caused just 0.3
watts of forcing since 1750. Begin in 1900 to match the
temperature start-date, and the base solar forcing more than
doubles to 0.7 watts. Multiply by 2.7, which the Royal Society
suggests is the UN's current factor for climate feedbacks, and
you get 1.9 watts – more than six times the UN's figure.
The entire 20th-century warming from all sources was below 2
watts. The sun could have caused just about all of it.
Next, the UN slashed the natural greenhouse effect by 40 per
cent from 33C in the climate-physics textbooks to 20C, making
the man-made additions appear bigger.
Then the UN chose the biggest 20th-century temperature increase
it could find. Stern says: "As anticipated by scientists, global
mean surface temperatures have risen over the past century." As
anticipated? Only 30 years ago, scientists were anticipating a
new Ice Age and writing books called The Cooling.
In the US, where weather records have been more reliable than
elsewhere, 20th-century temperature went up by only 0.3C.
AccuWeather, a worldwide meteorological service, reckons world
temperature rose by 0.45C. The US National Climate Data Centre
says 0.5C. Any advance on 0.5? The UN went for 0.6C, probably
distorted by urban growth near many of the world's
fast-disappearing temperature stations.
The number of temperature stations round the world peaked at
6,000 in 1970. It's fallen by two-thirds to 2,000 now: a real
"hockey-stick" curve, and an instance of the UN's growing
reliance on computer guesswork rather than facts.
Even a 0.6C temperature rise wasn't enough. So the UN repealed a
fundamental physical law. Buried in a sub-chapter in its 2001
report is a short but revealing section discussing "lambda": the
crucial factor converting forcings to temperature. The UN said
its climate models had found lambda near-invariant at 0.5C per
watt of forcing.
You don't need computer models to "find" lambda. Its value is
given by a century-old law, derived experimentally by a
Slovenian professor and proved by his Austrian student (who
later committed suicide when his scientific compatriots refused
to believe in atoms). The Stefan-Boltzmann law, not mentioned
once in the UN's 2001 report, is as central to the
thermodynamics of climate as Einstein's later equation is to
astrophysics. Like Einstein's, it relates energy to the square
of the speed of light, but by reference to temperature rather
The bigger the value of lambda, the bigger the temperature
increase the UN could predict. Using poor Ludwig Boltzmann's
law, lambda's true value is just 0.22-0.3C per watt. In 2001,
the UN effectively repealed the law, doubling lambda to 0.5C per
watt. A recent paper by James Hansen says lambda should be 0.67,
0.75 or 1C: take your pick. Sir John Houghton, who chaired the
UN's scientific assessment working group until recently, tells
me it now puts lambda at 0.8C: that's 3C for a 3.7-watt doubling
of airborne CO2. Most of the UN's computer models have used 1C.
Stern implies 1.9C.
On the UN's figures, the entire greenhouse-gas forcing in the
20th century was 2 watts. Multiplying by the correct value of
lambda gives a temperature increase of 0.44 to 0.6C, in line
with observation. But using Stern's 1.9C per watt gives 3.8C.
Where did 85 per cent of his imagined 20th-century warming go?
As Professor Dick Lindzen of MIT pointed out in The Sunday
Telegraph last week, the UK's Hadley Centre had the same
problem, and solved it by dividing its modelled output by three
to "predict" 20th-century temperature correctly.
A spate of recent scientific papers, gearing up for the UN's
fourth report next year, gives a different reason for the
failure of reality to keep up with prediction. The oceans, we're
now told, are acting as a giant heat-sink. In these papers the
well-known, central flaw (not mentioned by Stern) is that the
computer models' "predictions" of past ocean temperature changes
only approach reality if they are averaged over a depth of at
least a mile and a quarter.
Deep-ocean temperature hasn't changed at all, it's barely above
freezing. The models tend to over-predict the warming of the
climate-relevant surface layer up to threefold. A recent paper
by John Lyman, of the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Association, reports that the oceans have cooled sharply in the
past two years. The computers didn't predict this. Sea level is
scarcely rising faster today than a century ago: an inch every
15 years. Hansen now says that the oceanic "flywheel effect"
gives us extra time to act, so Stern's alarmism is misplaced.
Finally, the UN's predictions are founded not only on an
exaggerated forcing-to-temperature conversion factor justified
neither by observation nor by physical law, but also on an
excessive rate of increase in airborne carbon dioxide. The true
rate is 0.38 per cent year on year since records began in 1958.
The models assume 1 per cent per annum, more than two and a half
times too high. In 2001, the UN used these and other adjustments
to predict a 21st-century temperature increase of 1.5 to 6C.
Stern suggests up to 10C.
Dick Lindzen emailed me last week to say that constant
repetition of wrong numbers doesn't make them right. Removing
the UN's solecisms, and using reasonable data and assumptions, a
simple global model shows that temperature will rise by just 0.1
to 1.4C in the coming century, with a best estimate of 0.6C,
well within the medieval temperature range and only a fifth of
the UN's new, central projection.
Why haven't air or sea temperatures turned out as the UN's
models predicted? Because the science is bad, the "consensus" is
wrong, and Herr Professor Ludwig Boltzmann, FRS, was as right
about energy-to-temperature as he was about atoms.
Monckton, Lord Christopher: Gore's Global Warming Fraud
Norman Dodd: Congressional Investigator, former Banker
Norman Dodd, Griffin - Google Videos
Norman Dodd was
a Banker and
eye-witness to the
Crash of 1929.
Later he was a
Congressional Investigator of
Exempt Foundations during the
Reese Committee, 1959.
This interview outlines his discovery that some of the largest
Tax Exempt Foundations
Socialists having among their objectives the
assimilation of the West "comfortably merged with
Soviet Union" into a single Socialist block.
In preparation for this assimilation, these same
Exempt Foundations, including the
Rockefeller Foundation are indoctrinating our youngsters
with their tyrannical Socialist perspectives.
Quigley, Carroll... "Tragedy & Hope";
Issues: Dodd, Norman:
Congressional Investigator & former Banker;
Issues: Griffin, G. Edward: Creature From Jekyll
Issues: Russo, Aaron: "America, Freedom to Fascism"