senators know that I have studied a terrible and pernicious
heart of darkness
that has developed in our court system, being the use of
FALSE ACCUSATIONS in civil justice.
is the mischief of litigating parties, usually mothers,
suddenly within the context of divorce and within child
custody proceedings falsely accusing the other party,
usually fathers, of the sexual abuse of their own children.
FALSE ACCUSATIONS are often made with the overt
or covert complicity of their
lawyers. They are a
lethal weapon in the business of parental alienation. They
are a tool for achieving sole custody of children and
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage
16.10 Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal
BREACH OF TRUST"
the ideas that the State assigns
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from
pre-war Nazi Germany. Under the British system
rights are not State-given, but God Given.
Buying into the Court's position that what
rights remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same
position that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and
Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and
they will likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these
This is completely FALSE. The Judges
are Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT
CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
PARLIAMENT has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was
only observed and documented by individuals sent out by the
newly Norman Crown after the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the
laws and customs of the various peoples of Britain..
This was done with a view to aggregate existing customs
which may vary across the land, into a unified body of
Laws. The Authority quoted by the Commoners in their
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
The process of documentation took only a
couple of hundred years, and
the product was a STATIC body of Law which was historical,
popular, and has served in the intervening centuries as a
Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
Corpus : "literally, "you
may have the body". A Habeas
Corpus is a legal writ that protects an individual against arbitrary
imprisonment by requiring that any person arrested be brought before
a court for formal charge. If the charge is considered to be valid,
the person must submit to trial; if not, the person goes free. When
the law is suspended, then individuals can be imprisoned
indefinitely and without charge."
Skeletons in the Closet, a film drawn from the dramatized lives
of families living with a protected
Pedophile and the mental
illness it may create when a loving, faithful, Victim keeps the
Secret. This is shockingly
common. The Secret is their Power -
(You would be well advised to stay away from the Public Servant.)
a) NOT report results of studies which do
not show "expected results", and
b) if "unexpected results do eventually get
reported, they may only be reported with "expert" commentary to
explain away the deviation from the expected result that "Men are
violent" and "Women are their Victims".
The World Health has as a primary Sponsor, the
Rockefeller Foundations, a
Fabian Socialist group
which has as it's aim the conversion of the West to a Soviet style
block which can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.
See Norman Dodd.
Opponents of Equal Parenting like to tell you
that seventy something percent of Custody Cases don't go to Trial,
and are awarded as Sole Custody to Mom BY CONSENT.
What they don't tell you is that in ninety
something percent of Custody Cases that do go to Trial Mom gets Sole
Custody anyway, and Dad has to pay on top of his Lawyer fees, the
Court Costs for having lost his Application. Faced with these
abysmal odds, Dads are commonly told to "Just give her what she
wants so you can have a good relationship with her". Under
Duress many Dads foolishly acquiesce .... for
a time at least......
We prefer that Natural Parents NOT sign a Consent
Order that is not completely Equal with respect to Gender, as the
relationship of the divorced couple is greatly destabilized with
each injury to the equality of parental powers .
Pedophile Activists obviously don't go around
telling you what they're up to. Instead they call
themselves "Mentors", "Social
Workers", "Feminists" or "Homosexual Rights Activists". In
Canada, Pedophile Activists have been successful in getting
greater access to children by reducing the
of Consent to ,
and in eliminating a parents "right to know" when the child reaches
the age of
replacing them with school counselors and
Social Workers, and by, of course, eradicating fathers from
their children's lives entirely from birth on request by the mother.
the recent changes to accommodate homosexual marriage, the right of
natural parents to "parent" their natural children will soon be
removed entirely. Through these statutory changes, the term
"LEGAL PARENT" is replacing the
historic term "NATURAL PARENT"
in Canadian statutes. As a result Natural
Parents can no longer automatically claim to be the Legal Parents of
their own natural children at birth. Instead, to accommodate
the Homosexual Activists' plan to push Natural Parents aside when it
comes to parenting children, the Courts alone now decide who will be
the "parents' of all children born in Canada.
Activists are often lawyers, school counselors, teachers,
Social Workers, Sex Ed teachers,
pastors, Judges, etc. etc. They seek positions with access and
power over Children & Families, and positions to create social and
political change. The publicly undisclosed prevalence of
Pedophile & Homosexual Activists in our civil service has been
attributed to their determined politicism in the many groups like
ACT UP! , the secrecy of the
alliances made in various "secret societies" and sex clubs, and to
Sexual Nepotism in the workplace.
Dr. Stanley Monteith, Orthopedic Surgeon, Radio Liberty:
Aids, Fluoride, Tax Exempt Foundations, Luciferian "Brotherhood of Darkness"
Exposing the Tax Exempt Foundations - Dr. Stan Monteith
First interview with Norman Dodd
was by Dr Stan Monteith
shortly before Mr. Dodd Passed away. He reveals the hidden truth
about the Tax Exempt Foundations as chief investigator in
The Reece Commitee Report authorized by Congress. This is
about The Rockefeller, Carnegie, and Ford Foundations who since
the turn of the century have set out to influence and manipulate
the education and morals of not only the USA but Countries
Globally. Reduced standards of Education and sexual promiscuity
of today have their roots in these Foundations. He states that
the foundations were very influential in instigating conflicts
around the world.
Stanley Monteith. It is impossible to understand the
unfolding of world events without the information
contained in this video. What was the origin of the
on Foreign Relations, and what is its relationship
Socialism and Communism? This video is felt by many
researchers to be the best single source of information
on the movements working to create a New World Order. No
researcher, or seeker for the truth should be without a
copy of this highly acclaimed presentation.
DR. Monteith goes over the history of fluoride, its use, its
dangers and its promotion over time. Why something that is
rejected by so many nations is promoted here in the USA. Learn
about the Hidden Agenda behind the use of Fluoride, who's behind
it and the real purpose behind its use
Lawyers consistently estimate the homosexual
fraction of the Law Societies & Judiciaries as "forty-something"
percent. That is, a randomly selected Judge or Lawyer is
about thirty times more likely to be homosexual than the
population at large. (BTW, a randomly selected Homosexual
is about forty times more likely to be a
Pedophile than a
randomly selected Canadian.).
The Judiciary now claims the right to
INTERPRET whatever meaning they want into the written Statutes
of Parliament, and refuse to be bound by any literal, contextual
reading of a Statute of Parliament.
By these nefarious
have "interpreted" the Charter to give themselves
and with it eliminated Natural Parents' rights, obliging - they
claim - our Parliament & Legislatures to replace the term
with the term
Without the knowledge or
consent of the Canadian people, these
have robbed you of the right to be the Legal Parent of your own
We are noticing too that they
are lying to us about what
COMMON LAW is. Ask a few lawyers what Common Law is,
and we guess they will tell you the Lie that it is whatever is
commonly being Ordered by
the Judges at any point in time, and
is therefore very dynamic and cannot be defined. We can
happily tell you this is completely FALSE, and is instead an
admission of their malicious intent.
It has been said that "men become accomplices
to those tragedies which they fail to oppose". Nowhere is that
truth more clearly demonstrated than in the apocalypse currently
unfolding across the world as the HIV epidemic continues its
silent spread from land to land.
As of January 1, 1997 over 350,000 Americans will be dead,
another 200,000 will be in the terminal stages of their illness,
and an additional six hundred thousand to a million more will be
HIV infected. Barring the possibility that protease inhibitors
can permanently block HIV-induced immunosuppression, almost all
those currently infected will progress to terminal-stage illness
The enormity of the tragedy facing America
today, however, is dwarfed by the tragedy sweeping Asia and
Africa. As of mid-1994, in the small landlocked nation of Malawi
in Southern Africa, 30% of high school students and 68% of
college students tested were found to be HIV infected. (1)
Recent testing of soldiers throughout Africa revealed a 50% HIV
infection rate, while testing of military units in Zimbabwe
revealed a 90% infection rate. It is estimated that in Zimbabwe
between one-quarter and one-third of President Mugabe's Cabinet
have already perished from AIDS. (2)
In the May, 1996 issue of Special Warfare, a magazine
distributed primarily to members of Special Operations (Military
Intelligence) units, Dr. Brian Sullivan writes: "The immediate
future may present other daunting challenges...Because of
complicated social and cultural reasons, AIDS already infects a
high proportion of the military and civilian officials of Zaire,
Uganda, Kenya, Zambia and other central African countries. In
some or all of these countries government establishments may
collapse in the next 10-15 years...civil rule may also erode or
break down in parts of North Africa, the Middle East, India and
Southeast Asia." (3)
In Uganda, the average life span of men has
fallen to 30 years, while the average life span of women has
fallen to 27 years. (4) A missionary friend living in Africa
reports that there are over nine million children in sub-
Saharan Africa who have lost their mothers to AIDS, and that one
in every four miners working in South Africa are HIV positive.
These statistics were communicated to me by E-mail from Vern
Tisdalle, a missionary stationed in Johannesburg, South Africa.
It is estimated that by the turn of the century the epicenter of
the epidemic will have shifted from Africa to Asia. Indian
health authorities currently estimate that "as many as 20
million or even 50 million Indians will be infected by the year
2000, and that there will be more AIDS patients than hospital
beds". (5) On June 1, 1996 Reuter's News Service reported that
Dr. William Blattner of the Institute of Human Virology at the
University of Maryland estimated that 100 million people will be
HIV infected by the year 2000. (6) In both Asia and Africa, HIV
infection (AIDS) is primarily a heterosexual disease, while in
Western nations the illness is found almost exclusively among
homosexuals, IV drug users, and more recently among heterosexual
blacks. Why is there such variance between the continents? There
are several possible explanations. Dr. Max Essex, Director of
the Harvard AIDS Institute, has reported that the predominant
subtype of the virus found in Western nations is HIV-I: subtype
B, whereas in both Asia and Africa the predominant subtypes are
C and E. Dr. Essex believes that the Langerhans cells which line
the vagina and oral cavities are the primary sites for HIV
infection. In laboratory experiments using Langerhans cell
cultures, investigators have discovered that HIV I: subtype B is
only minimally infectious to LH cells, whereas subtypes C and E
are highly infectious. This study may explain why we find
heterosexual spread of HIV infection in Asia and Africa where
subtypes HIV I: C and E predominate, but only rarely in Western
nations where subtype B is found. It is presumed that
homosexuals and IV drug users contract HIV I: subtype B readily
because of their lifestyles involving needle sharing and rectal
sex. (7) Dr. Essex's work, however, does not explain the
heterosexual epidemic developing within black America today.
This aberration may be explained by studies which have found
that certain genetic factors predispose blacks to HIV infection.
Researchers have recently identified two mutated genes in some
whites that are not found in blacks; these altered genes protect
their hosts from HIV infection. There may well be other yet
unrecognized genetic factors which confer complete or partial
immunity to whites, but these factors have yet to be identified.
Shortly after the year 2000 blacks will make
up the majority of new HIV infections occurring here in the
United States. (10) That supposition is reflected in statistics
released by the Department of Health in Virginia in 1996.
Because of the 10-year latency period between HIV infection and
immunodeficiency, AIDS statistics reflect the status of the
epidemic 10 years ago rather than what is happening today.
Virginia's current AIDS statistics suggest equal numbers of
blacks and whites infected while HIV statistics reveal that 64%
of recent infections are among blacks while only 31.8% are among
whites. These figures become even more frightening when one
reflects that blacks make up only 22.6% of Virginia's
What most people do not realize is that all efforts to utilize
public health measures to slow spread of the HIV epidemic have
been thwarted. Why?
(A) Because most people don't understand what
(B) Because many who do recognize the
unfolding tragedy have been threatened and are afraid to speak
(C) Because both public
health officers and physicians have been effectively blocked
from introducing the public health measures needed to stop
further spread of this modern-day plague. (12)
(A) Randy Shilts, author of "And The Band Played On" recognized
this fact when he wrote: "The bitter truth was that AIDS did not
just happen to America - It was allowed to happen by an array of
institutions, all of which failed to perform their appropriate
tasks to safeguard the public health ... There was no excuse, in
this country and in this time, for the spread of a deadly new
Why is this happening? Tragically, most
Americans do not understand the magnitude of the epidemic
because our print and TV media have been selective in reporting
matters dealing with the epidemic. I know that from first-hand
experience because I and many of my cohorts have been thwarted
in our efforts to disseminate the truth about the magnitude of
the epidemic. I have recorded that story in my book "AIDS: The
Unnecessary Epidemic", published in 1991 by Covenant House. An
interesting study in thought control in America today is to try
to acquire my book via regular distribution channels.
In recent years several other books have been
published which have, in my opinion, presented misleading
information about the epidemic. Tragically, that misinformation
has discouraged introduction of the public health measures
needed to save human lives. In 1990 Regnery Gateway published
Michael Fumento's "The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS". In that book,
Fumento assured his readers that there was no possibility of
heterosexual spread of AIDS here in the United States. Noting
that the epidemic had not exploded within the white,
heterosexual community as feared, Fumento crafted a convincing
tale belittling those of us who wanted to introduce public
health measures to block further spread of the disease. In his
book, Fumento accused me of "iceberg-theory terrorism" because
during the early stages of the epidemic I expressed fear that
HIV disease would spread into the general heterosexual
population. (14) As time has gone by I have publicly modified my
view, but to the best of my knowledge Michael Fumento has never
recanted his message that no public health measures were needed.
During the early stages of the epidemic, we were both wrong. I
erred on the side of caution; Michael Fumento erred on the side
that insists that preventive health measures were not needed to
stop the epidemic.
The tragedy unfolding in both Asia and Africa today reflects the
apathy engendered by the misinformation disseminated during the
early 1990s. I sincerely believe that the lives of hundreds of
thousands of homosexuals, IV drug users, black heterosexuals and
black children could have been saved had public health measures
been introduced at that time. Had measures been introduced in
Asia and Africa, hundreds of millions of lives could have been
saved. That, however, was not to be. (15). In 1994 Inside Story
Publications released "Why We Will Never Win the War on AIDS"
written by Brian Ellison and Dr. Peter Duesberg. Dr. Duesberg
insists that there is no AIDS epidemic, and that most of those
who are assumed to have died from AIDS have actually succumbed
to the complications of drug usage, sexual stimulants, and AZT.
(16) An updated version of Dr. Duesberg's book was republished
by Regnery Publishing Inc. in 1996 under the title "Inventing
the AIDS Virus". Both books contended that:
 "in most individuals suffering from AIDS,
no virus particles can be found anywhere in the body" (17)
 "retroviruses do not kill cells" (18)
 There are no scientific studies to
document any relationship between HIV infection and
 Kimberly Bergalis was perfectly healthy
before she was given AZT (20)
 HIV-infected hemophiliacs and transfusion
recipients do not die from immunodeficiency but rather from
their hemophilia and other diseases. (21)
A number of other questionable arguments were presented in a
clever and convincing manner in Dr. Duesberg's book, and they
swayed many people. After all, why would Dr. Duesberg, a
world-famous retrovirologist, make such statements if they
weren't true? Let me respond:
 Clinicians presently chart the course of
HIV disease by measuring the numbers of viral particles present
in peripheral blood.
 Because the HIV retrovirus routinely
kills normal T cells in the laboratory, special resistant lines
of T cells must be used to culture the retrovirus: This
information was confirmed by telephone conversation with Dr.
Donald Francis in August 1996, and with the chief of the CDC
virology lab in Atlanta, Georgia, in February 1996.
 There have been a number of published
studies documenting the relationship between HIV infection and
terminal-stage immuno- suppression: (22,23)
 Kimberly Bergalis was severely immuno-
compromised, contracted pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and had a
CD4 count as low as 41 before she was started on AZT. This
information was obtained from Kimberly's college medical records
which were graciously provided to me by her father, George.
 Both Ellison and Dr. Duesberg ignore the
fact that hemophiliacs and transfusion recipients who have died
have virtually all manifested the classic, clinical picture of
terminal- stage immunodeficiency. (24)
A detailed analysis of Dr.Duesberg's arguments and his agenda is
beyond the scope of this article. That subject is covered in my
HIV-Watch newsletter, and in my monograph, "The Population
Control Agenda". Unfortunately, Dr. Duesberg's books have
convinced many otherwise sincere people that there is no reason
to institute standard public health measures to control further
spread of the epidemic. (25)
(B) Why have people been afraid to speak out?
I personally know of physicians, medical personnel and
politicians who have had their professions ruined simply because
they dared to comment publicly on the mishandling of the
epidemic. On one occasion two public health officers approached
me stating: "We want you to know that we support you and what
you're doing, but we can't come out publicly because we've been
threatened." That pattern of intimidation has been commonplace
since the inception of the epidemic. The story of the threats
and intimidation utilized to silence concerned professionals is
also covered in "AIDS:The Unnecessary Epidemic". (26)
(C) For centuries epidemics have been stopped
by identifying the infected, and preventing them from
transmitting their illness to others. In the case of HIV disease
it would have been relatively simple to have blocked further
spread of the epidemic in the mid-1980s when the HIV blood test
became available. That, however, was not to be. Even before the
blood test was released in May of 1985 there were forces
organizing to block the introduction of standard public health
measures to control further spread of the epidemic. Virtually
all necessary public health measures have been precluded because
of those efforts. (27,28)
The precedent for public health management of
a sexually transmitted disease epidemic was established by
Surgeon General Thomas Parren during the syphylis epidemic of
the 1930s. Had physicians been allowed to introduce the public
health measures needed in the mid-1980s we could have stopped
further spread of the plague. What should have been done?
 Physicians should have been instructed to
carry out routine, non-mandatory, confidential HIV testing on
all office and hospital patients.
 Mandatory reportability of the names of
the infected to public health officials should have been
instituted to facilitate contact tracing, compilation of
accurate statistics, and identification of those who were
intentionally spreading their illness.
 Mandatory premarital, prenatal, and
neonatal HIV testing should have been introduced to save the
lives of sexual partners, unborn and newborn children.
 Infected prostitutes should have been
identified and removed from our streets.
 Houses of prostitution, gay sex clubs and
bathhouses should have been closed.
 Nationwide treatment programs for drug
addicts should have been introduced.
 Education should have stressed chastity
and morality rather than instructing our youth how to put on
condoms and lecturing them on aberrant sexual activity.
Tragically, almost all efforts by concerned public health
officers and physicians to address the HIV epidemic have been
thwarted. I know from personal experience because for over a
decade I led the battle within the House of Delegates of the
California Medical Association to introduce the public health
measures needed to stop the epidemic. Year after year the
physicians voted to introduce effective public health measures,
and year after year those within the hierarchy and the
bureaucracy of organized medicine worked to block implementation
of those policies. That tragic story is also chronicled in my
book "AIDS: The Unnecessary Epidemic".
Men and women of conscience are not relieved
of their moral responsibility to speak out concerning the manner
in which this epidemic has been handled simply because it has
failed to involve the white heterosexual population of America.
In my opinion, almost everyone who acquires this disease today
does so because of our nation's failure to implement the public
health measures necessary to block further spread of the
illness. I sincerely believe that men do become accomplices to
those tragedies which they fail to oppose. Failure to speak out
in times of moral crises makes cowards of men, and these days we
live in are surely times of great moral crisis.
(1) Radio Interview. John Harris. 9/13/95. Radio Liberty, P.O.
Box 13, Santa Cruz, CA 95063. Copies available.
(2) Radio Interview. Peter Hammond of Front
Lines Ministry: 9/20/96. Radio Liberty. Copies available.
(3) Sullivan Brian R. Special Operations and
LIC in the 21st Century: The Joint Strategic Perspective:
Special Warfare. The John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and
School May 1996; 9(2):4. Contact Superintendent of Documents, US
Publishing Office, Washington D.C. 20402
(4) Life Expectancy Shortened in Uganda.
Xinhua News Agency 8/18/96. (See also CDC AIDS Daily Summary
(5) Burns JF. Denial and Taboo Blind India to
the Horror of the AIDS Scourge. New York Times 9/22/96: 1. (See
also CDC Daily Summary 9/23/96: 2.)
(6) Blattner W. More than 100 Million
Worldwide Predicted to be HIV-Positive by Year 2000. Reuters
News Service 6/17/96. (See also CDC AIDS Daily Summary 6/19/96:
(7) Soto KE et al. HIV-1 Langerhans' Cell
Tropism Associated with Heterosexual Transmission of HIV.
Science 3/1/96; 271: 1291
(8) Kolata Gina. New AIDS Study Reveals
Startling Immunity Data. New York Times 9/27/96: A13:
(9) Dean Michael. Genetic Restrictions of
HIV-1 Infection and Progression of AIDS. Science 9/27/96; 273:
(10) The Changing Face of AIDS. New York
Times 11/04/96: A26
(11) Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of
Health: Division of STD/AIDS Surveillance Quarterly; 4(2,3):1.
Available from P.O. Box 2448,Room 112, Richmond, VA 23218
(12) Monteith SK. AIDS:The Unnecessary
Epidemic. Covenant House 1991. (See also HIV-Watch; I-V.) P.O.
Box 1835, Soquel, CA 95073.
(13) Shilts Randy. And the Band Played On.
St. Martin's Press 1987: xxii.
(14) Fumento Michael. The Myth of
Heterosexual AIDS. Regnery Gateway 1990: 303.
(15) Ibid: 178-184
(16) Ellison Brian., Duesberg Peter H. Why We
Will Never Win the War on AIDS. Inside Story Communications. El
Cerrito CA 1994 : v-viii.
(17) Duesberg Peter H. Inventing the AIDS
Virus. Regnery Publishing Inc 1996: 175
(18) Ibid: 158
(19) Why We Will Never Win The War On AIDS.
op cited: 250
(20) Inventing the AIDS Virus: op cited:
(21) Ibid: 4, 183-185, 286-288
(22) Asher MS. et al. Does Drug Use Cause
AIDS. Nature 3/11/93; 362:103
(23) Schecter Martin T. et al. HIV-1 and the
Aetiology of AIDS. Lancet 3/13/93; 341: 658-659
(24) Minimal Data Set for Risk
Reduction,National Totals 1/1/93 - 12/31/93. 125 Hemophilia
Treatment Centers Reporting to the CDC.
(25) Why We Will Never Win the War On AIDS;
op cited: 122
(26) AIDS:The Unnecessary Epidemic; op cited.
(27) And the Band Played On; op cited:
(28) AIDS:The Unnecessary Epidemic: op cited:
136, 161-66, 193, 342-43.
Dr. Stanley Monteith, Orthopedic Surgeon, Radio Liberty
Aids, Fluoride, Tax Exempt Foundations, Luciferian "Brotherhood of Darkness"
Mr. Dodd ..
reveals the Tax Exempt
Carnegie, and Ford Foundations who since the
turn of the century have set out to
the education and morals of .. countries
globally. Reduced standards of Education and sexual promiscuity
of today have their roots in these Foundations.
"What most people do not realize is that all
efforts to utilize public health measures to
slow spread of the HIV epidemic have been
.. Because both public health officers
and physicians have been ..
from introducing the public health measures
needed to stop further spread of this
Tim collapsed at work after lunch, shortly after pressing
Presidential Candidates on their supposed membership in a Secret
Society. It is surprisingly easy to slip one of 10-15
substances into a victim's meal which will be reported on
autopsy as "heart attack".
1, 1776 – Adam Weishaupt (code named Spartacus)
establishes a secret society called the
Order of the Illuminati. Weishaupt is the Professor of Canon
Law at the University of Ingolstadt in Bavaria, part of Germany.
The Illuminati seek ..a New World Order. Their objectives are as
"ACT UP! told Canadian homosexuals to push
for homosexual marriage so HIV infected American homosexuals could be
put on Canadian health care programs under the Spousal Benefits plan
for married couples."
This interview outlines
Dodd's discovery that some of the largest
Tax Exempt Foundations
of the US
Socialists having among their objectives the
assimilation of the West into a single Socialist block.
To this end, many of the largest Tax Exempt
Foundations are through
"Education", quietly reconfiguring
the American psyche, preparing Americans to be "comfortably merged with
Lawyers consistently estimate the homosexual fraction of
the Law Societies & Judiciaries as "forty-something" percent.
a randomly selected Judge or Lawyer is about thirty
TIMES more likely to be homosexual than the population at large
discovery that some of the largest
Tax Exempt Foundations
of the US
Socialists having among their objectives the
assimilation of the West into a single Socialist block.
The this end, they are through Education, reconfiguring
the American psyche, preparing the US to be "comfortably merged with
Morgan, JP: Founding Member of Federal Reserve
Tesla had to be crushed
when he found Tesla was working on the wireless transmission of FREE
power. Morgan may be the most obvious
Beneficiary of the Govt. selloffs & Banking "Bailouts" of 2009 ff,
thanks to Henry Paulson.
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.