
Issues Area Home
1215: MAGNA CARTA, JUNE 15TH Issues Summaries Abortion Veto for Dads ACTA = Anti-Counterfeiting Surveilance Adoption Veto for Dads Adopted Children Disallowed NPs Affirmative Action Age Of Consent Anti-Depressants, Drug Induced Suicide Battered Woman Syndrome BC Vital Statistics Act Misandry BC Legislature MUST Big Brother, Micro-Management Bill C-22 Best interests of the Child Breach of Trust "Case Law" is NOT Law CCA Wood and Playgrounds Child Support Tables / SOW Fraud "Child's Right" or "Parents' Right" Child Trafficking by Public Officers Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges Compulsory Drugging of Children, Thymerisol Corren Agreement Court Ordered Sexism Credit Crisis, Currency Replacment Custody Orders not Enforced Debtor's Prison Reinstituted Day Care Universal Deadbeat Dads Disabled parents DISS = Divorce Initiated Suicide Syndrome Domestic Violence Propaganda Division of Assets Enticement Seduction Ex Parte Orders False Accusations Father Hatred Propaganda Fatherlessness, State Imposed Federal Reserve / Fiat Currency Feminism = Socialism = Nazism Fitness Test for Natural Parents in Divorce Fitness Test for Students: "Transitions" FMEP = Family Maintenance Enforcement Forgiveness is NOT Compulsory Freedom of Speech Friendly Parent Rule, Max. Contact Fundamental Justice Globalism is Treason Global Warming Fraud "Climategate" Habeus Corpus Abandoned "Hate Crime" Speech Police Homofacism Homosexual Activism Homosexual Marriage "Human Rights” Commissions in Canada Human Trafficking Imputed Income Inheritance Theft: Grey & Black Widow Judicial Activism is Breach of Trust Judicial Falsification of Court Transcripts Judicial Freemasonry is Racketeering Judicial Globalization is Treason Judicial Interpretation Kinship Families & Grandparents raising Children Law Societies' Self Regulation, Corruption Lawyers Lying in Court Legal Abuse Syndrome Letters to MP Letters to MLA Letters to Editor Malicious Mother Syndrome Malicious Prosecution Misandry, Hatred of Males Monetary Crisis: "Money as Debt" Move Aways Narcissism Natiional Sovreignity Natural Parents Rights Eliminated, SSM NAU = North American Union Net Neutrality: Keep Internet Free!! No Fault Divorce NCR = Not Criminally Responsible Parliament MUST Parental Alienation Parental Kidnapping Parenting Time Presumption Passport & DL Removal Paternity Denied Fathers at Birth Registration Paternity Fraud, Birth Registration Pedophiles Fear Dads!! Pedophiles Fear Dads New Pedophiles in Public Service Petitions Poofy Judges Protestant Revolution, BBC Sexual Abuse by a Public Officer Shadow Government Sole Custody is Child Abuse Special Prosecutors for Homosexuals, Judges Star Chamber's Secret Overlords SOW = Status of Women, KILL IT!!!! Stockholm Syndrome Paradigm Shift Straw Man Redemption, Free Man Supremacy of Parliament Target Legislation Teachers displacing Parents Teachers Seducing Students Tracts and Flyers "Women's Shelters" Lesbian Gulags |
|






Albrecht, Katherine : RFID Spychips Annett, Kevin: Child Trafficking in Beautiful BC Asher, Jeffrey Baskerville, Stephen: "Taken .. Custody Baxter, Dorian: Canada Courtwatch BC Conservatives Beck, Glenn Beck: World Government Bennett, Richard: Purpose Driven & Catholicism Blick, Edward: Global Warming & Marxism Blumner,Court Ordered Sexism Boys of St. Vincent <Mount Cashel>, NL Burrows, Lynette: Homo Adoption Carley, Dr. Rebecca: Vaccinations Carr, William Guy: Pawns in the Game Christie, Doug: Freedom of Speech, Assembly Chopra, Dr. Shiv: Health Canada Coulter, Ann: Free Speech Cools, Senator Anne: Lying Lawyers Coffman, Dr. Michael: Global Warming Coleman, John: Global Warming Fraud Conspiracy of Silence, Boystown Pedophiles Cromwell, Oliver: Supremacy / Parliament Cuddy, Dennis L. Cumbey, Constance : New Age Nazism Dodd, Norman: NWO Fabian Socialists Dutton, Don: RADAR, "Rethinking DV" EP-Australia Federer, Bill: Endang'd Speeches, Quran Farrell, Warren: Why Men Earn More Fischer, Greg: Family Preservation Festival Fogal, Connie: No NAU Forseth, MP Paul: FTSOTC Panelist Fromm, Paul: Free Speech, CAFE FTSOTC 48 Recom's Gage, Richard: Architects & Engineers 9/11 Gairdner William Galloway, Roger: FTSOTC Panelist Geldof, Sir Bob: The Love.. Gerrish, Brian: EU's "Common Purpose" Griffin, G. Edward: Fed Reserve Grignon, Paul: "Money As Debt" Gunderson, Ted: FBI Haeck, Lisa: Sexual Abuse Haines, Bruce, QC: Justice Review Hiebert, MP Russ: Human Rights Commission Hill, MP Jay: EP Legislation Hinton , Betty: Status of Women's "Hit List" Howse, Torm "In a Small Town" Pedophile Boy Scouts Iserbyt, Charlotte: Dumbing Down Jones, Alex Kay, Barbara, National Post Kennedy, John F: targeted, Assassination 1963 Kernberg, Dr. Otto: Personality Disorder Keyes, Alan : Kruk, Edward: Child Custody Leslie, Sarah: "Pied Pipers of Purpose" LInde, Carey: Statutory Ammendments Lively, Scott: "Pink Swastika" Luther, Martin: "Sola Scriptura" Martin, Malachi: Globalization, Occult McManus, John: Stopping NAU McKay, Dr. Marty McLean, Candis MacKenzie, Rob: "Paul Revere Ride", EP Trek 2006 McQuaid, Robert: Fix Children's Aide Society, CAS Millar, David Mills, Dennis: Former MP Targetted by Homsexuals Monckton, Lord Christopher Monarchy, David Starkey Monteith, Dr. Stanley: Tax Exempt Foundations Murtari, John: Hunger Striker for Time with Son Nash, Dave: Cross Canada Run Nazanin: Persian Beauty for a Free Iran Neufeld, Gordon: Hold - Kids Nicolosi, Joseph: Treatment of Homosexuality O'Connor, Matt: Original F4J-UK PAFE = Planetary Alliance for Fathers in Exile Palin, Sarah Paul, Dr. Ron: Sound Money Peck, Dr. Scott: "People of the Lie" Pedersen, Rob: EP Bike Trek US, 2007 Pellman, Adrian, LLB: Judicial Activism Perloff, James: Shadows of Power Phenomenon: The Lost Archives Pizzey, Erin: Women's Shelter Scam Plywood Man, NWT Quigley, Carroll: Banking, Globalization Rhodes, Carol: Friend.Court = Enemy. Family Riplinger, Gail: Luciferian Bibles Roberts, Carey Roberts, Elise Roscoe, Peter: Judicial Bigotry Russo, Aaron: NAU, CFR, Rockefellers Ruppert, Michael C Saburido, Jacqueline: Don't Drink Sacks. Glenn Secret Files of the Inquisition Schlafly, Phyllis: Global Governance Simons, Frank: Courts From Hell Schafer, Nancy: Child Trafficking at CPS Simpson, Kari: Road Kill Radio Smith, Ron: DC Rally, Drugging of Children Soever, Alar Sodhi, Eeva Somerville, Margaret:“Same-Sex Marriage” Still, Bill: "Money Masters", "The Mystery of Oz" Stopps, Gordon Vs Just Ladies, BCHRT Stormer, John: Betrayed .. Bench Story, Christopher: "Perestroika Dec. Sutton, Anhony: Wall Street & Hitler Taylor, Captain Tony: F4J-US "Fatherless Day" Trociuk Darrell, BC Birth Registration Tyndale, William, "God's Outlaw", RIP 1536 V for Vendetta / Guy Fawkes the Hero Vellacott, MP Maurice Ventura, Jesse: Conspiracy Theory Vieira, Dr. Edwin: Fiat Empire Wagener, William Warren, Elizabeth: Collapse Middle Class Watson, Paul: EU's Nazi Origins William III & Mary II: "Bill of Rights" 1689 Wooldridge, Nancy: Canadian Grans Zepezauer, Frank: Feminist Crusades |
|
Let Ex Husbands Be Fathers Perception vs Reality Some Facts... Both Parents Vital Broken Homes, Bleak Future Justice Review Fatherneed Rights of fathers Ignored? |
|
Support one of over 50 class-actions against
unconstitutional 'sole custody' by Indiana Civl Rights
Council
thetruthandjusticefoundation.org
BC Statutory Amendments |
McKenzie & Pedersen, the "Two Robs",
Equal Parenting Bike Trek US 2006, 2007...

Robb MacKenzie Equal Parenting Bike Trek - Google Search;
Robb MacKenzie Equal Parenting Bike Trek - Google Video

Rob Pederson, Equal Parenting - Google Search;
Robert Pederson, Equal Parenting - Google Video

Cycling4Children.com
Equal Parenting Bike Trek's photostream
More:
Issues:
McKenzie & Pedersen, the "Two Robs", Equal Parenting Bike
Trek US 2006, 2007...;
Issues: Smith,
Ron: DC Family Preservation Rally, Compulsory Drugging
of Children;
Issues:
Compulsory Drugging of Children, Thymerisol; |
Beware of the "Parental Rights" IMPOSTER!!!!

"Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights"
Be on the lookout for the "Parent's
Rights" IMPOSTER. Insist on "Natural Parents Only",
please!
It comes as a big surprise to us that
many groups that present themselves as
"Parents Rights" groups REFUSE to defend the
NATURAL PARENT, and
and to demand RESTORATION
of
Natural Parents Rights taken from Canadians in the
Homosexual Marriage
legislation.

Instead their position to promote the
"rights" of a "Parent" in the widest sense of the
word, making NO distinction between
NATURAL PARENTS and
wannaabe
Legal Parents. They have bowed to
University of
Victoria's assertion that the SCC's
Trociuk
Decision
"endorses a Heterosexual View of the Family and must be
ignored", legitimizing the ongoing
Child
Trafficking by the State which views
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in
the lucrative Child
Adoption Market They refuse to be hampered by prior
obligations to that pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can
Veto an Adoption.


It appears that many
"Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United
Nations and Liberal
Irwin Cotler's assertion that the
Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent
has "NO RIGHTS",
making the State, not the Natural
Parents the Protector of the Child..
Without Cause or
Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!
More:
About:
Beware of the IMPOSTER!!!! "Natural Parent's Rights"
Vs "Parent's Rights";
News: Lessard, Hester - Heterosexual view of
Parenthood must be ignored
News: Smith,
Judge Daphne, BCSC, for Child Trafficking;
Issues: Trociuk,
Darrell;
Issues:
Child Trafficking, Canadian;
Testimonials: Rick Fredrickson of Saskatoon |
Bill Graham, Pedophile Parliamentarian & Defense
Minister


Bill Graham, mp - Google Search;
Bill Graham, mp - Google Video
Lawrence Metherel - Google Search
2007-06-19 Liberal MP Bill Graham announces
resignation
"In spite of credible revelations
dating back to April 2002 about Bill Graham, a sex addicted
bi-sexual sodomizing a 15 year old male prostitute named
Lawrence Metherel,
Paul Martin allowed Graham to remain
Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister - and eventually named
him to the portfolio of Minister of Defense.
"On Sept. 28/2005 a vote was held in Parliament to raise the
age of consent from 14 (one of the lowest age of consents in
the world) to 16 (an age which many still consider too low).
"Bill Graham, Paul Martin, and Anne
McLellan, on Sept. 28th, voted against raising the age of
consent to 16


More:
News: Graham,
Bill: Pedophile Parliamentarian, Defense Minister |


















 |
|
We apologize that the
following figures have not been developed for the Province of BC
specifically. We hope to do this over time. We do know,
however that women often move to BC from Alberta and the rest of Canada
to have their divorces done here in BC where the
misandry of the Family Courts will
maximize their powers to destroy their husbands.
Children from fatherless homes account
for:
-
63% of youth suicides. (Source: US Dept.
of Health & Human Services, Bureau of the Census).
-
71% of pregnant teenagers. (Source: US
Dept. of Health & Human Services)
-
90% of all homeless and runaway
children.
-
70% of juveniles in state-operated
institutions come from fatherless homes (Source: U.S. Dept. of
Justice, Special Report, Sept 1988)
-
85% of all children that exhibit
behavioral disorders. (Source: Center for Disease Control).
-
80% of rapists motivated with displaced
anger. (Source: Criminal Justice & Behavior, Vol. 14, p. 403-26,
1978).
-
71% of all high school dropouts.
(Source: National Principals Association Report on the State of High
Schools).
-
75% of all adolescent patients in
chemical abuse centers. (Source: Rainbows for all God's Children).
-
85% of all youths sitting in prisons.
(Source: Fulton Co. Georgia jail populations, Texas Dept. of
Corrections 1992).
Children from fatherless
homes are:
-
11 times more likely to exhibit violent
behavior than children from intact "married" homes.
-
5 times more likely to commit suicide.
-
32 times more likely to runaway.
-
20 times more likely to have behavioral
disorders.
-
14 times more likely to commit rape.
-
9 times more likely to drop out of high
school.
-
10 times more likely to abuse chemical
substances.
-
9 times more likely to end up in
state-operated institutions.
-
20 times more likely to end up in
prison.
"37.9% of
fathers have no access/visitation rights."
(Source: p.6, col.II, para. 6, lines 4 & 5, Census Bureau
P-60, #173, Sept 1991.)
"40% of mothers reported that they had interfered with the
non-custodial father's visitation on at least one occasion, to punish
the ex-spouse." (Source: p. 449, col. II, lines 3-6, (citing
Fulton) Frequency of visitation by Divorced Fathers; Differences in
Reports by Fathers and Mothers. Sanford Braver et al, Am. J. of
Orthopsychiatry, 1991.)
"Overall,
approximately 50% of mothers "see no value in the father's continued
contact with his children...."
(Source: Surviving the Breakup, Joan Kelly & Judith
Wallerstein, p. 125) Only 11% of mothers value their husband's input
when it comes to handling problems with their kids. Teachers & doctors
rated 45%, and close friends & relatives rated %16.(Source: EDK
Associates survey of 500 women for Redbook Magazine. Redbook, November
1994, p. 36)
"The former
spouse (mother) was the greatest obstacle to having more frequent
contact with the children." (Source:
Increasing our understanding of fathers who have infrequent contact with
their children, James Dudley, Family Relations, Vol. 4, p. 281, July
1991.)
"A clear
majority (70%) of fathers felt that they had too little time with their
children." (Source: Visitation and the
Noncustodial Father, Mary Ann Kock & Carol Lowery, Journal of Divorce,
Vol. 8, No. 2, p. 54, Winter 1984.)
"Very few of
the children were satisfied with the amount of contact with their
fathers, after divorce." (Source:
Visitation and the Noncustodial Father, Koch & Lowery, Journal of
Divorce and Remarriage, Vol. 8, No. 2, p. 50, Winter 1984.)
"Feelings of anger towards their former spouses hindered effective
involvement on the part of fathers; angry mothers would sometimes
sabotage father's efforts to visit their children." (Source:
Ahrons and Miller, Am. Journal of Orthopsychiatry, Vol. 63. p. 442, July
1993.)
"Mothers may
prevent visits to retaliate against fathers for problems in their
marital or post-marital relationship."
(Source: Seltzer, Shaeffer & Charing, Journal of Marriage & the Family,
Vol. 51, p. 1015, November 1989.)
In a study: "Visitational
Interference - A National Study" by Ms. J Annette Vanini, M.S.W. and
Edward Nichols, M.S.W., it was found that 77% of non-custodial fathers
are NOT able to "visit" their children, as ordered by the court, as a
result of "visitation interference" perpetuated by the custodial parent.
In other words, non-compliance with court ordered visitation is three
times the problem of non-compliance with court ordered child support and
impacts the children of divorce even more. Originally published Sept.
1992
Child Support
Information from multiple
sources show that only 10% of all non-custodial fathers fit the
"deadbeat dad" category: 90% of the fathers with joint custody paid the
support due. Fathers with visitation rights pay 79.1%; and 44.5% of
those with NO visitation rights still financially support their
children. (Source: Census Bureau report. Series P-23, No. 173).
Additionally, of those not paying support, 66% are not doing so because
they lack the financial resources to pay (Source: GAO report:
GAO/HRD-92-39 FS).
The following is sourced from: Technical Analysis Paper No. 42, U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Income Security
Policy, Authors: Meyer and Garansky.
-
Custodial mothers who receive a support
award: 79.6%
-
Custodial fathers who receive a support
award: 29.9%
-
Non-custodial mothers who totally
default on support: 46.9%
-
Non-custodial fathers who totally
default on support: 26.9%
source:
http://njlaw924.com/id39.html |
|
Judges and their elite
Star
Chamber entrench their power and status to rule over Canadians with
impunity and unbridled
narcissism.
Feminist and Homosexual Activists as Judges effect
their political agenda without the consent of the Canadian demographic.
They with full knowledge and intent (scripted in the sixties & seventies
by their Activist writers) circumvent due democratic process and
knowingly contravene the founding legal constructs of Canada in the BNA
& in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Activist Judges happily
and routinely breach the Trust placed in them by their employer, the
Canadian Taxpayer.
Lawyers routinely Entice into self-destruction and
financial rape vast numbers of families entering their doors.
Because of the Statutory self-regulation of the BC Law Society, we know
of no limiting factor to cap the Activism of the Judiciary other than
prosecuting Judges and Lawyers who exceed the powers granted them by
Statute.
The BC Law Society pimps BC women, and use them as
their hookers. With others (also conspicuously funded by the
Taxpayer), Law Society members instruct women to hook fathers and
families into the Courts and the financial ruin a "Legal Marriage"
entails. Children NEED this threat to their security to be
EXTERMINATED.
Faced with the entrenched Father Hatred and
Affirmative Action of the burgeoning civil service, boys and young men
despair. Having no vision for a Future or a university education,
they become prone to fulfill the Father Hatred prophecies of BC
university's Women's Studies faculties and Feminist Activists. |
|
2005-xx-xx Third
National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect
"Children of single parents were at
higher risk of physical abuse and of all types of neglect and were
overrepresented among seriously injured, moderately injured, and
endangered children. Compared with their counterparts living with both
parents, children in single parent families had:
-
a 77% greater risk of being
harmed by physical abuse (using the stringent Harm Standard) and a
63% greater risk of experiencing any countable physical abuse (using
the Endangerment Standard);
-
an 87% greater risk of being
harmed by physical neglect and a 165% greater risk of experiencing
any countable physical neglect;
-
a 74% greater risk of being
harmed by emotional neglect and a 64% greater risk of experiencing
any countable emotional neglect;
-
a 220% (or more than three
times) greater risk of being educationally neglected;
-
an approximately 80% greater
risk of suffering serious injury or harm from abuse or neglect;
-
an approximately 90% greater
risk of receiving moderate injury or harm as a result of child
maltreatment; and
-
a 120% (or more than two times)
greater risk of being endangered by some type of child abuse or
neglect."
|
|
2006-11-10
Top judges rebuke Tories Federal plan would allow police to help
appoint judiciary - workopolis.com; "Beverley
McLachlin, Canada's Chief Justice, along with a powerful council of
the country's top judges issued an unprecedented rebuke yesterday to
Justice Minister Vic Toews for hatching a plan to arbitrarily change
the way judges are chosen. The Canadian Judicial Council
expressed dismay that Mr. Toews is planning to introduce
"significant
changes to the composition and functioning of the Judicial Advisory
Committees," secret groups which are set up in each region to vet
candidates for the 1,100 federal judgeships across the country.
Chief Justice McLachlin, who chairs the council, urged Mr. Toews to
include the judiciary and key legal bodies in any discussion of
changes to the committee vetting process."
We
need in the very least some kind of JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY ACT
which will look something like::
-
Divide the Law Society into two groups of
Judges and Practicing Lawyers to protect the Lawyers who would
make Cases against Judges. There would be some Law Society
Members who may practice as Barristers, and some as Solicitors,
but a Judge must RETIRE from the Practice of Law and
become unable to affect the Law Society while they act as a
Judge. On removal of a Judge for
Judicial Activism,
the Law Society may deny their return to Practice from
Retirement for specified cause, such as the case made during
an unsuccessful Criminal Charge of
Breach of Trust or Treason.
-
The Judges naturally divide into two bodies,
the Provincial and Federal Judicial Societies to parallel the
Provincial and Federal Courts. Membership in both Judicial
Societies must be precluded. Federal Judges would be tried
by Provincial Judges according to the
JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY ACT, and the Provincial Judges would
be tried by the Federal Judges. They could be tried both
in Tort and in Criminal Court for
Breach of Trust and for
Treason.
-
Make Judicial Appointments for a FIXED TERM
of no more than five years (Jimmy Pattison where are you when we
need you?)
-
Judicial Re-Appointment must meet a Test for
Judicial Re-Appointment which demonstrates the prescribed
Impartiality (that is an Activism Free record.) and Non-Infamy
with the Electorate.
-
Automatic Temporary Suspension Without Pay
for a Judge who is going to Trial in Tort or in Criminal
Court, pending its outcome.
-
Eradication
of
Freemasonry from the Judiciary and Law Societies. Both
are granted special privileges by Parliamentary Statute which
they receive In Trust.. Judicial Candidates and sitting
Judges must be vetted for
Occult
practices resulting in Public Safety concerns such as
Pedophilia.
Pedophilia is an established part of Occult worship
(See
Malachi Martin among others) and is reported to be a
tolerated practice of some high ranking Judges.
-
Trial by Jury of Judges before non-allied and
non-associated Judges, e.g.. Federal
Judges
tried before Provincial Judges, visa versa..
-
NO SPECIAL
PROSECUTORS for Judges or other Public Servants being
tried.
Under the "federal" division of powers in the BNA
(Constitution Act, 1867)) Education falls into the Provincial
domain. A parallel Provincial Statute to amend the licensing
and Suspension of
Teachers
would be necessary to stop the present use of our Schools for
Political Indoctrination by Activists. See also
Four Missions |
|
Do we have any such provision? Who executes
the required actions in the event a Judge has to be removed?
Submit new info on Removal of Judges
Removal of judges from office, Oklahoma
Constitution
(a) In addition to other
methods and causes prescribed by the Constitution and laws,
the judges of any court, exercising judicial power under the
provisions of Article VII, or under any other provision, of
the Constitution of Oklahoma, shall be subject to removal
from office, or to compulsory retirement from office, for
causes herein specified, by proceedings in the Court on the
Judiciary.
(b) Cause for removal from
office shall be: Gross neglect of duty; corruption in
office; habitual drunkenness; commission while in office of
any offense involving moral turpitude;
gross partiality in office;
oppression in office; or other grounds as may be
specified hereafter by the legislature.
(c) Cause for compulsory
retirement from office, with or without compensation, shall
be mental or physical disability preventing the proper
performance of official duty, or incompetence to perform the
duties of the office" |
|
Habeas
Corpus : "literally, "you
may have the body". A Habeas
Corpus is a legal writ that protects an individual against arbitrary
imprisonment by requiring that any person arrested be brought before
a court for formal charge. If the charge is considered to be valid,
the person must submit to trial; if not, the person goes free. When
the law is suspended, then individuals can be imprisoned
indefinitely and without charge."
.....
More,
Glossary of
terms |
|
2006-03-10 The right to abandon your child by Mona Charen;
"This
is one of those moments when you want to grab liberals by the lapels
and demand, "Well, what did you expect?" ... A group called the
National Center for Men has filed a lawsuit they are calling "Roe v.
Wade for Men." ... More than three decades
ago Roe vs. Wade gave women control of their reproductive lives but
nothing in the law changed for men. Women can now have sexual
intimacy without sacrificing reproductive choice. Women now have the
freedom and security to enjoy lovemaking without the fear of forced
procreation. Women now have control of their lives after an
unplanned conception. But men are routinely forced to give up
control, forced to be financially responsible for choices only women
are permitted to make, forced to relinquish reproductive choice as
the price of intimacy."
COMMENT: Roe
V. Wade was a "Femi-Narcissistic" decision, looking after the
interests of the Mother only. The principal established there
established was extrapolated into a Mother's "murder rights"
expressed in minimal sentences when murdering their children.
Equal Parenting eliminates much of this. |
Father dealt difficult hand by the system
"Even last week, when the family court file of
Elaine and Leo Campione was released to the press -- in
significant measure because Mr. Campione didn't oppose the
media's bid to see it .. There is, to be frank, an
underlying perspective of feminist oppression from which all
else springs. .. Women are seen first as victims --
generally of male power and particularly of husband power -- and
presumed to be truth-tellers and good mothers until proven
otherwise. The starting point for men is that they are abusers
and deadbeat dads in the making unless they can prove the
contrary, and if it takes years for them to demonstrate that, oh
well."
|
| |
Dave Nash, "Cross Canada Run" Equal Parenting Trek 2010
|
Petition For Equal Shared Parenting Family Law Reform In
Canada
Petition For Equal Shared Parenting Family Law Reform In Canada
To: The House of Commons of Canada
Prime Minister Stephen Harper – Leader of the
Conservative Party of Canada
Michael Ignatieff – Leader of the Liberal Party of Canada
Gilles Duceppe - Leader of the Bloc Quebecois
Jack Layton – Leader of the New Democratic Party of Canada
Elizabeth May – Leader of the Green Party of Canada
Justice Minister Rob Nicholson
The House of Commons of Canada in Parliament Assembled
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, Citizens of Canada, draw the
attention of the House of Commons in Parliament assembled to the
following:
THAT WHEREAS the Canadian Family Justice System is
failing Children and their Families by creating an adversarial
atmosphere that is contradictory to the best interests of
children. As Canadian Family Court Judge, Justice Harvey
Brownstone stated in an interview with CBC’s Susan Ormiston, “My
position is that the Family Court is the last place that parents
in conflict should be going to, to convert themselves from
ex-partners, to co-parents. That is what they need to do, and it
doesn't happen in a courtroom, because a courtroom sets parents
up to wage war, not peace, and for the sake of their children,
their children need their parents to be at peace."
WHEREAS the Canadian Government is failing Children by
refusing to fulfill its legal obligation to the United Nations
Convention on the Rights of the Child, which Canada signed on
May 28th, 1990 and consented to on December 13th, 1991. As it
stands today, Canada is failing its children in regards to its
Family Law practices, on 19 specific articles from the United
Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.
WHEREAS the Canadian Government is failing Children by
refusing to reform the Family Law system in Canada, by
continually ignoring repeated proposed legislation calling for
Family Law reform in this country; such as the reccomendations
put forth in the 1998 report by the Special Joint Committee on
Child Custody and Access entitled, “For The Sake Of The
Children”, as well as the Honourable Jay Hill’s Private Members
Bill, Bill C-245, that was introduced before Parliament in
October of 2002.
Upon introducing Bill C-245 before the House Of Commons, Mr.
Hill stated, "Shared parenting should not be awarded only under
special circumstances, but it should be granted under all
circumstances, except in cases of proof of abuse, neglect,
mistreatment, or if it is not in the best interests of the
child. Child custody remains an important issue to many
Canadians. This bill aims to force change in an area the
government continues to ignore."
WHEREAS the Federal Government of Canada is now being
given another opportunity to finally put Children’s best
interests forward with the introduction of an Equal Shared
Parenting Private Members Bill, Bill C-422, that was introduced
before Parliament on June 16th, 2009, by M.P. Maurice Vellacott
of Saskatoon. Bill C-422 would reform the Divorce Act, and make
Equal Shared Parenting the normative determination by courts
dealing with situations of divorce involving children.
Upon introducing Bill C-422 before parliament, Mr. Vellacott
stated, “Unfortunately many Canadian Families experience the
break up of a marriage, and when this happens the results can be
devastating to children. Children are caught in the middle, but
should not be used as a weapon, or alienated from one of the
parents. Aside from proven abuse or neglect, Canadians want
Equal Shared Parenting to be the presumption in our courts when
marriages break up, because it is in the best interests of
children, and because it is part of an enlightened equality
agenda.”
WHEREAS Bill C-422
is very important in bringing Canadian legislation in line with
what the best research says about the best interests of
children. In his December 2008 research paper,
CHILD CUSTODY, ACCESS & PARENTAL RESPONSIBILITY: The Search
For A Just And Equitable Standard,
Professor Edward Kruk
of The University of British Columbia states,
“Children of divorce want equal time with their parents and
consider shared parenting to be in their best interests. Seventy
per cent of children of divorce believe that equal amounts of
time with each parent is the best living arrangement for
children, and children who have had equal time arrangements have
the best relations with each of their parents after divorce.
WHEREAS the vast majority of the Canadian public, 78
percent, supports Equal Shared Parenting legislation, with a
high of 86 percent in the province of Quebec, and among
supporters of major Political Parties in Canada, Equal Shared
Parenting is supported by 78 percent of Conservatives, 78.5
percent of NDP’s, 80.6 percent of Liberals and 83 percent of
Bloc Quebecois.
WHEREAS the Conservative Party’s own Policy Declaration
states in section K, under the title SOCIAL POLICY, #69,
“The Conservative Party believes that in the event of a marital
breakdown, the Divorce Act should grant joint custody, unless it
is clearly demonstrated not to be in the best interests of the
child. Both parents and all grandparents should be allowed to
maintain a meaningful relationship with their children and
Grandchildren, unless it is demonstrated not to be in the best
interest of the child.”
WHEREAS Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff has written,
“These groups demanded that the custody and access regime
created by the Divorce Act of 1985 be replaced with a shared
parenting regime in which both parents are given equal rights to
bring up their children. These are sensible and overdue
suggestions, and the fact they are being made shows that men and
women are struggling to correct the rights revolution, so that
equality works for everyone.”
THEREFORE, your petitioners request that the Canadian
Government stop failing the children of this country, and that
the House of Commons in Parliament assembled revise the Divorce
Act and pass Private Members Bill C-422, to ensure that the best
interests of children are put forth in our courts, by making
Equal Shared Parenting the normative determination in dealing
with situations of divorce involving children. We also request
that adequate judicial training and accountability be
implemented to ensure compliance with the legislation and the
will of Parliament.
Sincerely,
Petition For Equal Shared Parenting Family Law Reform In Canada |
2009-10-08
Hello Everyone. My
name is Dave Nash, and on April 25th, 2010,
Parental Alienation Awareness Day, I will
attempt to break the
Guiness World Record for
the Fastest Crossing of Canada
on Foot (Male). The current record is
72 days, 10 hrs and 23 min. It was set from June
21st, to September 1st, in 1991 by Al Howie, who
ran across Canada, from St John's, Nfld, to
Victoria, BC, a distance of 7295.5 km (4,533.2
miles).
I am attempting to break this
World Record to raise awareness about our
Country's FAILING and BROKEN,
so-called "Family" Justice System, as well as
our Governments' UNWILLINGNESS and
OUTRIGHT REFUSAL to reform the system for
the sake of our children.
Furthermore, I am attempting
to break the World Record for the Fastest
Crossing of Canada on Foot to help get your
support as a Canadian Citizen, for an
Equal Shared Parenting Private Members Bill,
Bill C-422, that was introduced before
Parliament on June 16th, 2009, by MP, Maurice
Vellacott of Saskatoon.
Bill C-422 would reform the
Divorce Act, and help put Children's best
interests forward by making Equal Shared
Parenting the normative determination by
courts dealing with situations of divorce
involving children.
I
ask you, don't the Children of Divorce deserve
the right to have an Equal Relationship with
both their Mother and their Father???
If you believe that Children
do, then please visit
http://www.crosscanadarun4thechildren.com/ to
see how you can help ensure that Equal Shared
Parenting becomes the Law in Canada.
I thank you in advance for your
support.
Dave Nash
|
|
"Child's Right" or "Parents' Right"
Who is the Protector of a Child's Right, now that Natural
Parents Rights have been eliminated in the Homosexual Marriage
Legislation? It is the State. The State will pretend
to "Protect" the Rights of a Child against the Parent.
This is why they are using the Nazi vocabulary of "Rights & Responsibilites" instead of "God-Given Rights"
of Common Law, and
conditioning you to "Child's Rights" & "Parental
Responsibilities". More:
Issues: "Child's Right" or
"Parents' Right" ;
Issues:
Kruk, Edward: "Child Custody, Access & Parental Responsibility";
Issues: Vellacott,
Maurice, MP: Equal Parenting Advocate, Bill C-422;
About: Equal
Parenting How-Tos, "Three Layer Cake";
News:
Hertzman, Clyde: World Bank Consultant;
News: OECD =
Organization for Economic Cooperation & Development, Global
Prosperity Shared Globally |
Child
Support Tables are Hyper-inflated,
Orders are Doubled

Status of Women's Fraud
After much wrangling with
SOW, the
rapacious
Child Support Tables
and the removal of Punitive measures for
False Allegations
were accepted by the
Joint Senate-Commons Committee on Child Custody and Access
for passage into Law, ON CONDITION that passed with it would be the
Equal Shared
Parenting Legislation. We are told the
thinking was that with
Equal Parenting
in place, the
Child Support Tables
would become insignificant.
The Liberal Government , however,
double
crossed the Committee by
splitting the compromised Bundle and
and passing alone the
Child Support Tables. while "tabling"
the Equal Shared
Parenting Legislation.
 Geologist Alar Soever later analyzed the Tables in
2002-04-02 Child Support Tables, Alar Soever.
2004-02-19 Hedy Fry (SOW) fights fairness in Custody
More
Child Support Fraud;
Letters to MP: I have $104.58 left over after paying child support;
Testimonials: Darren White, RIP
Testimonials:
Mark Dexel, RIP of Kamloops, BC;
Testimonials: Manley, Perry: RIP
Testimonials:
Jeffery, Hal & Danica
Issues:
Custody Orders not Enforced;
Issues:
Parental Alienation Syndrome;
Issues:
Imputed income;
Issues:
Child Support Fraud;
Issues:
Debtors' Prison Reinstituted
|
|
|