"Natural
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
"Natural
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage
bill"
16.10 Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule
has to go to conform to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be
held in criminal BREACH OF TRUST"
FYI,
the ideas that the State grants
Rights
Responsibilities Citizen is straight from pre-war Nazi
Germany. Under the British system rights are not
State-given, but God Given.
Buying into the Court's position that what
rights remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same
position that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and
Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.
In
"Women and the Process of Constitutional Reform"
McLellan warns that <Horrors!>
"Provincial
Legislatures may impose a presumption of Joint Custody...
and perpetuate the domination of men over women"
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and
they will likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these
days".
This is completely FALSE. The Judges
are Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT
CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
1649, only
PARLIAMENT has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was
only observed and documented by individuals sent out by the
newly Norman Crown after the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the
laws and customs of the various peoples of Britain..
This was done with a view to aggregate existing customs
which may vary across the land, into a unified body of
Laws. The Authority quoted by the Commoners in their
administration of
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
Bible and
principles of
Danelaw
The process of documentation took only a
couple of hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body
of Law which was historical, popular, and has served in the
intervening centuries as a Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
Instead their position to promote the
"rights" of a "Parent" in the widest sense of the
word, making NO distinction between
NATURAL PARENTS and
wannaabe
Legal Parents. They have bowed to
University of
Victoria's assertion that the SCC's
Trociuk
Decision
"endorses a Heterosexual View of the Family and must be
ignored", legitimizing the ongoing
Child
Trafficking by the State which views
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in
the lucrative Child
Adoption Market They refuse to be hampered by prior
obligations to that pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can
Veto an Adoption.
It appears that many
"Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United
Nations and Liberal
Irwin Cotler's assertion that the
Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent
has "NO RIGHTS",
making the State, not the Natural
Parents the Protector of the Child..
Without Cause or
Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!
"In spite of credible revelations
dating back to April 2002 about Bill Graham, a sex addicted
bi-sexual sodomizing a 15 year old male prostitute named
Lawrence Metherel,
Paul Martin allowed Graham to remain
Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister - and eventually named
him to the portfolio of Minister of Defense.
"On Sept. 28/2005 a vote was held in Parliament to raise the
age of consent from 14 (one of the lowest age of consents in
the world) to 16 (an age which many still consider too low).
"Bill Graham, Paul Martin, and Anne
McLellan, on Sept. 28th, voted against raising the age of
consent to 16
We apologize that the
following figures have not been developed for the Province of BC
specifically. We hope to do this over time. We do know,
however that women often move to BC from Alberta and the rest of Canada
to have their divorces done here in BC where the
misandry of the Family Courts will
maximize their powers to destroy their husbands.
Children from fatherless homes account
for:
63% of youth suicides. (Source: US Dept.
of Health & Human Services, Bureau of the Census).
71% of pregnant teenagers. (Source: US
Dept. of Health & Human Services)
90% of all homeless and runaway
children.
70% of juveniles in state-operated
institutions come from fatherless homes (Source: U.S. Dept. of
Justice, Special Report, Sept 1988)
85% of all children that exhibit
behavioral disorders. (Source: Center for Disease Control).
80% of rapists motivated with displaced
anger. (Source: Criminal Justice & Behavior, Vol. 14, p. 403-26,
1978).
71% of all high school dropouts.
(Source: National Principals Association Report on the State of High
Schools).
75% of all adolescent patients in
chemical abuse centers. (Source: Rainbows for all God's Children).
85% of all youths sitting in prisons.
(Source: Fulton Co. Georgia jail populations, Texas Dept. of
Corrections 1992).
Children from fatherless
homes are:
11 times more likely to exhibit violent
behavior than children from intact "married" homes.
5 times more likely to commit suicide.
32 times more likely to runaway.
20 times more likely to have behavioral
disorders.
14 times more likely to commit rape.
9 times more likely to drop out of high
school.
10 times more likely to abuse chemical
substances.
9 times more likely to end up in
state-operated institutions.
20 times more likely to end up in
prison.
"37.9% of
fathers have no access/visitation rights."
(Source: p.6, col.II, para. 6, lines 4 & 5, Census Bureau
P-60, #173, Sept 1991.)
"40% of mothers reported that they had interfered with the
non-custodial father's visitation on at least one occasion, to punish
the ex-spouse." (Source: p. 449, col. II, lines 3-6, (citing
Fulton) Frequency of visitation by Divorced Fathers; Differences in
Reports by Fathers and Mothers. Sanford Braver et al, Am. J. of
Orthopsychiatry, 1991.)
"Overall,
approximately 50% of mothers "see no value in the father's continued
contact with his children...."
(Source: Surviving the Breakup, Joan Kelly & Judith
Wallerstein, p. 125) Only 11% of mothers value their husband's input
when it comes to handling problems with their kids. Teachers & doctors
rated 45%, and close friends & relatives rated %16.(Source: EDK
Associates survey of 500 women for Redbook Magazine. Redbook, November
1994, p. 36)
"The former
spouse (mother) was the greatest obstacle to having more frequent
contact with the children." (Source:
Increasing our understanding of fathers who have infrequent contact with
their children, James Dudley, Family Relations, Vol. 4, p. 281, July
1991.)
"A clear
majority (70%) of fathers felt that they had too little time with their
children." (Source: Visitation and the
Noncustodial Father, Mary Ann Kock & Carol Lowery, Journal of Divorce,
Vol. 8, No. 2, p. 54, Winter 1984.)
"Very few of
the children were satisfied with the amount of contact with their
fathers, after divorce." (Source:
Visitation and the Noncustodial Father, Koch & Lowery, Journal of
Divorce and Remarriage, Vol. 8, No. 2, p. 50, Winter 1984.)
"Feelings of anger towards their former spouses hindered effective
involvement on the part of fathers; angry mothers would sometimes
sabotage father's efforts to visit their children." (Source:
Ahrons and Miller, Am. Journal of Orthopsychiatry, Vol. 63. p. 442, July
1993.)
"Mothers may
prevent visits to retaliate against fathers for problems in their
marital or post-marital relationship."
(Source: Seltzer, Shaeffer & Charing, Journal of Marriage & the Family,
Vol. 51, p. 1015, November 1989.)
In a study: "Visitational
Interference - A National Study" by Ms. J Annette Vanini, M.S.W. and
Edward Nichols, M.S.W., it was found that 77% of non-custodial fathers
are NOT able to "visit" their children, as ordered by the court, as a
result of "visitation interference" perpetuated by the custodial parent.
In other words, non-compliance with court ordered visitation is three
times the problem of non-compliance with court ordered child support and
impacts the children of divorce even more. Originally published Sept.
1992
Child Support
Information from multiple
sources show that only 10% of all non-custodial fathers fit the
"deadbeat dad" category: 90% of the fathers with joint custody paid the
support due. Fathers with visitation rights pay 79.1%; and 44.5% of
those with NO visitation rights still financially support their
children. (Source: Census Bureau report. Series P-23, No. 173).
Additionally, of those not paying support, 66% are not doing so because
they lack the financial resources to pay (Source: GAO report:
GAO/HRD-92-39 FS).
The following is sourced from: Technical Analysis Paper No. 42, U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Income Security
Policy, Authors: Meyer and Garansky.
Custodial mothers who receive a support
award: 79.6%
Custodial fathers who receive a support
award: 29.9%
Non-custodial mothers who totally
default on support: 46.9%
Non-custodial fathers who totally
default on support: 26.9%
Judges and their elite
Star
Chamber entrench their power and status to rule over Canadians with
impunity and unbridled
narcissism.
Feminist and Homosexual Activists as Judges effect
their political agenda without the consent of the Canadian demographic.
They with full knowledge and intent (scripted in the sixties & seventies
by their Activist writers) circumvent due democratic process and
knowingly contravene the founding legal constructs of Canada in the BNA
& in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Activist Judges happily
and routinely breach the Trust placed in them by their employer, the
Canadian Taxpayer.
Lawyers routinely Entice into self-destruction and
financial rape vast numbers of families entering their doors.
Because of the Statutory self-regulation of the BC Law Society, we know
of no limiting factor to cap the Activism of the Judiciary other than
prosecuting Judges and Lawyers who exceed the powers granted them by
Statute.
The BC Law Society pimps BC women, and use them as
their hookers. With others (also conspicuously funded by the
Taxpayer), Law Society members instruct women to hook fathers and
families into the Courts and the financial ruin a "Legal Marriage"
entails. Children NEED this threat to their security to be
EXTERMINATED.
Faced with the entrenched Father Hatred and
Affirmative Action of the burgeoning civil service, boys and young men
despair. Having no vision for a Future or a university education,
they become prone to fulfill the Father Hatred prophecies of BC
university's Women's Studies faculties and Feminist Activists.
"Children of single parents were at
higher risk of physical abuse and of all types of neglect and were
overrepresented among seriously injured, moderately injured, and
endangered children. Compared with their counterparts living with both
parents, children in single parent families had:
a 77% greater risk of being
harmed by physical abuse (using the stringent Harm Standard) and a
63% greater risk of experiencing any countable physical abuse (using
the Endangerment Standard);
an 87% greater risk of being
harmed by physical neglect and a 165% greater risk of experiencing
any countable physical neglect;
a 74% greater risk of being
harmed by emotional neglect and a 64% greater risk of experiencing
any countable emotional neglect;
a 220% (or more than three
times) greater risk of being educationally neglected;
an approximately 80% greater
risk of suffering serious injury or harm from abuse or neglect;
an approximately 90% greater
risk of receiving moderate injury or harm as a result of child
maltreatment; and
a 120% (or more than two times)
greater risk of being endangered by some type of child abuse or
neglect."
2006-11-10
Top judges rebuke Tories Federal plan would allow police to help
appoint judiciary - workopolis.com; "Beverley
McLachlin, Canada's Chief Justice, along with a powerful council of
the country's top judges issued an unprecedented rebuke yesterday to
Justice Minister Vic Toews for hatching a plan to arbitrarily change
the way judges are chosen. The Canadian Judicial Council
expressed dismay that Mr. Toews is planning to introduce "significant
changes to the composition and functioning of the Judicial Advisory
Committees," secret groups which are set up in each region to vet
candidates for the 1,100 federal judgeships across the country.
Chief Justice McLachlin, who chairs the council, urged Mr. Toews to
include the judiciary and key legal bodies in any discussion of
changes to the committee vetting process."
We
need in the very least some kind of JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY ACT
which will look something like::
Divide the Law Society into two groups of
Judges and Practicing Lawyers to protect the Lawyers who would
make Cases against Judges. There would be some Law Society
Members who may practice as Barristers, and some as Solicitors,
but a Judge must RETIRE from the Practice of Law and
become unable to affect the Law Society while they act as a
Judge. On removal of a Judge for
Judicial Activism,
the Law Society may deny their return to Practice from
Retirement for specified cause, such as the case made during
an unsuccessful Criminal Charge of
Breach of Trust or Treason.
The Judges naturally divide into two bodies,
the Provincial and Federal Judicial Societies to parallel the
Provincial and Federal Courts. Membership in both Judicial
Societies must be precluded. Federal Judges would be tried
by Provincial Judges according to the
JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY ACT, and the Provincial Judges would
be tried by the Federal Judges. They could be tried both
in Tort and in Criminal Court for
Breach of Trust and for
Treason.
Make Judicial Appointments for a FIXED TERM
of no more than five years (Jimmy Pattison where are you when we
need you?)
Judicial Re-Appointment must meet a Test for
Judicial Re-Appointment which demonstrates the prescribed
Impartiality (that is an Activism Free record.) and Non-Infamy
with the Electorate.
Automatic Temporary Suspension Without Pay
for a Judge who is going to Trial in Tort or in Criminal
Court, pending its outcome.
Eradication
of
Freemasonry from the Judiciary and Law Societies. Both
are granted special privileges by Parliamentary Statute which
they receive In Trust.. Judicial Candidates and sitting
Judges must be vetted for Occult
practices resulting in Public Safety concerns such as
Pedophilia.
Pedophilia is an established part of Occult worship
(See
Malachi Martin among others) and is reported to be a
tolerated practice of some high ranking Judges.
Trial by Jury of Judges before non-allied and
non-associated Judges, e.g.. Federal
Judges
tried before Provincial Judges, visa versa..
NO SPECIAL
PROSECUTORS for Judges or other Public Servants being
tried.
Under the "federal" division of powers in the BNA
(Constitution Act, 1867)) Education falls into the Provincial
domain. A parallel Provincial Statute to amend the licensing
and Suspension of Teachers
would be necessary to stop the present use of our Schools for
Political Indoctrination by Activists. See also
Four Missions
Removal of judges from office, Oklahoma
Constitution
(a) In addition to other
methods and causes prescribed by the Constitution and laws,
the judges of any court, exercising judicial power under the
provisions of Article VII, or under any other provision, of
the Constitution of Oklahoma, shall be subject to removal
from office, or to compulsory retirement from office, for
causes herein specified, by proceedings in the Court on the
Judiciary.
(b) Cause for removal from
office shall be: Gross neglect of duty; corruption in
office; habitual drunkenness; commission while in office of
any offense involving moral turpitude;
gross partiality in office;
oppression in office; or other grounds as may be
specified hereafter by the legislature.
(c) Cause for compulsory
retirement from office, with or without compensation, shall
be mental or physical disability preventing the proper
performance of official duty, or incompetence to perform the
duties of the office"
"The Family Courts
are <generally> a bunch of second rate hangers-on
... build each other's businesses through
referrals...Family Law is a <parasitic> self-sustaining
Industry"
Habeas
Corpus : "literally, "you
may have the body". A Habeas
Corpus is a legal writ that protects an individual against arbitrary
imprisonment by requiring that any person arrested be brought before
a court for formal charge. If the charge is considered to be valid,
the person must submit to trial; if not, the person goes free. When
the law is suspended, then individuals can be imprisoned
indefinitely and without charge."
.....
"This
is one of those moments when you want to grab liberals by the lapels
and demand, "Well, what did you expect?" ... A group called the
National Center for Men has filed a lawsuit they are calling "Roe v.
Wade for Men." ... More than three decades
ago Roe vs. Wade gave women control of their reproductive lives but
nothing in the law changed for men. Women can now have sexual
intimacy without sacrificing reproductive choice. Women now have the
freedom and security to enjoy lovemaking without the fear of forced
procreation. Women now have control of their lives after an
unplanned conception. But men are routinely forced to give up
control, forced to be financially responsible for choices only women
are permitted to make, forced to relinquish reproductive choice as
the price of intimacy."
COMMENT: Roe
V. Wade was a "Femi-Narcissistic" decision, looking after the
interests of the Mother only. The principal established there
established was extrapolated into a Mother's "murder rights"
expressed in minimal sentences when murdering their children.
Equal Parenting eliminates much of this.
Father dealt difficult hand by the system
"Even last week, when the family court file of
Elaine and Leo Campione was released to the press -- in
significant measure because Mr. Campione didn't oppose the
media's bid to see it .. There is, to be frank, an
underlying perspective of feminist oppression from which all
else springs. .. Women are seen first as victims --
generally of male power and particularly of husband power -- and
presumed to be truth-tellers and good mothers until proven
otherwise. The starting point for men is that they are abusers
and deadbeat dads in the making unless they can prove the
contrary, and if it takes years for them to demonstrate that, oh
well."
Erin Pizzey, Founder of the Women's Shelter Movement:
"Why I loathe feminism... and believe it will ultimately destroy the family"
There
is LOADS of government funding for
Women's Shelters and Legal Aide for women who claim
"Abuse".
Erin Pizzey, the founder of the Women's Shelter
Movement quickly found that the shelters were quickly
being taken over by
Lesbian /
Socialists
(commonly called
"Femi-Nazis"), but try as she might she was unable
to prevent the
Femi-Nazis Takeover or put an end to the Father
Hatred Literature put out by them. She now lives
in fear for her life, but still occasionally comes out
to speak against the
Women's Shelter Scam.
In Canada, it has been well
established for a couple of decades that less than 4% of
the women in Women's Shelters are actually physically
abused or in danger of being physically abused.
Nevertheless since there has yet to be a government who
is capable or determined enough to eradicate the
"Femi-Nazi Concentration Camps" from Canada
.
The demolition of the Canadian Family
continues unabated.
Rockefeller Foundation is a Sponsor of the World
Health Organization
,
like the infamous
Status of Women. These gave
Federal Funding, office space and other government
resources to "Minorities" to guide Parliament in policy
making and the revision of Canadian Statutes. The
most virulent and tenacious of these Canadian PACs
we think has proved to be the
"Femi-Nazi"
(Lesbian /
Socialist) PACs, who
effectively run Parliament Hill on many many issues, and
seem impossible to dislodge.
These and their Propaganda machines
at
the Women's Studies faculties are clearly unemployable
in any capacity other than the parasitic role they have
chosen for their careers. They cannot dig, or
create something of value. They are desperate to
remain where they are: on the Hill, in the Universities,
and in the plethora of Public Offices by which they seek
to run our lives in
thought, word, and deed.
Until we as Canadians remember the
value and vulnerabilities of the freedoms won for us in
1649 , and will
stand behind a
straight-thinking
Prime Minister like Stephen Harper who has desired -
under the watchful eye of an APOLITICAL Governor
General. - to put back in their place these
Activist and
fascist Public
Officers, how can we ever expect to arrest the
Sovietization
of Canada, and it's aggregation into a newly
global Soviet Union.
ERIN PIZZEY set up the world's first refuge for battered
women in 1971 - and went on to establish an international
movement for victims of domestic violence. But what she has
never made public before is that her own childhood was scarred
by the shocking cruelty of both her parents.
Here, for the first time, she tells the full
harrowing story - and how it led her to a surprising, but deeply
felt, conclusion ...
Tortured
childhood: Erin Pizzey was abused by both her mother and
father
Though I remember little of my earliest
years, I grew up in a world of extraordinary violence. I was
born in 1939 in Tsingtao,
China, and shortly after my family moved to Shanghai with my
diplomat father, we were captured by the invading Japanese army.
It was 1942, the war was raging and we were held under house
arrest until we were exchanged for Japanese prisoners of war and
put on the last boat out of China.
My father was ordered to Beirut by the
diplomatic service, and we were left as refugees in Kokstad,
South Africa. From living in an enormous house with a fleet
of servants and a nanny, my twin sister Rosaleen and I were
suddenly at the mercy of my mother Pat's temper. And it was
ferocious. Having escaped the brutality of the war, we were
introduced to a new brand domestic cruelty.
Indeed, my mother's explosive temper and
abusive behaviour shaped the person I later became like no other
event in my life.
Thirty years later, when feminism exploded
onto the scene, I was often mistaken for a supporter of the
movement. But I have never been a feminist, because, having
experienced my mother's violence, I always knew that women can
be as vicious and irresponsible as men.
Emotionally abused: Baby Erin (left) and
twin sister Rosaleen
with their parents
Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the
movement, which proclaimed that all men are potential rapists
and batterers, was based on a lie that, if allowed to flourish,
would result in the complete destruction of family life.
From the very beginning, I waged war against
my mother and quickly learned to disassociate myself from the
pain of her beatings.
Her words, however, stayed with me all my
life. 'You are lazy, useless, and ugly,' she would scream. 'You
look like your father's side of the family - Irish trash.'
They were vicious words that I have heard
repeated over and over by mothers everywhere. Indeed, when I
later opened my refuge for battered women, 62 of the first 100
to come through the door were as abusive as the men they had
left.
She was, however, right: I did look like my
father, Cyril. While my twin sister was slim and had long dark
hair, and my mother's deep blue eyes, I was fat and fair-haired,
clumsy, noisy and brash.
I was only five but I knew my mother
didn't like me
I was only five years old, but I knew my
mother didn't like me. And with no servants to restrain her now,
she lashed out whenever she felt like it.
When we finally joined my father in a flat in
Beirut, I soon realised that he was no saint either. He would
constantly scream and rage at all of us.
He was particularly consumed by jealousy.
Even though he verbally abused my mother and rarely showed her
affection, he seemed compelled to follow her around like a guard
dog.
If she spoke on the telephone, he grilled her
until she burst into tears. If she went out shopping, he paced
the room until she got back and exploded with rage if she were
more than a few minutes late.
I hated my father with all my childish heart
- and was truly terrified by him. He was 6ft 4in tall, massively
built and had a huge paunch that hung over his belt. He stared
out of piggy, pale blue eyes and had a big sloppy mouth that
slobbered over my lips when he kissed me.
He didn't believe in baths, which he said
were 'weakening', and smoked tins of Players Cigarettes, which
made him smell like an ashtray. His rages were explosive and
unpredictable.
But despite his clumsy, predictable form of
macho brutality - born out of his being the 17th child of a
violent Irish father - it was my mother's more emotional, verbal
form of abuse that scarred me most deeply.
She indulged in a particular kind of soul
murder - and it was her cruelty that, even 60 years on, still
reduces me to tears and leaves me convinced that feminism is a
cynical, misguided ploy.
Unfortunately, at that time, what I wanted
more than anything was for my mother to love me - something I
never felt she truly did. And so, when my father was posted to
Chicago, and I followed my mother to
Toronto, to live with my godparents, I was initially
hopeful. I believed that without my father's presence, she would
have the time be a real mother.
But once in the bosom of this normal family,
my own dysfunctional behaviour soon became apparent. I had, it
seems, already been too badly damaged by my mother's hatred of
me.
I was always in trouble at school,
encouraging the other children to behave as badly as I did. On
one occasion, I was caught sitting on the doorstep giving away
the money I'd stolen from my mother's bag.
Needless to say, my mother went berserk. She
took me upstairs and beat me with an ironing cord until the
blood ran down my legs. I showed my injuries to my teacher the
next morning - but she just stared back impassively and did
nothing.
Many years later, when feminists started
demonising all fathers, these stark images continually reminded
me of the truth - that domestic violence is not a gender issue.
She beat me until the blood ran down my
legs
Shortly after the war, my father was posted
to Tehran and we all went to live with him. It was only when I
saw him again that I remembered how much I hated him.
He would come home from the office, and as he
put the key in the door I would freeze. I would often hear him
coughing outside the door - he was still a heavy smoker - and
spitting phlegm into the flower bed.
His eyes were windows into his violent moods.
If they were narrowed and red, I knew he was in a rage and it
would only be a matter of time before he erupted.
But my hatred of my father was pure and
uncontaminated by any other emotions. My feelings about my
mother, however, were far more complicated.
As much as I was devastated by her hatred of
me, I still genuinely strove for her love. In fact, I had
moments of great compassion for her when I saw her weeping and
wailing in front of my father.
Occasionally, she fought back against his
brutality. She was only 4ft 9in, but my mother was extremely
strong and her tongue was lethal. She accused him of being an
oaf and an idiot. She called his mother a prostitute and his
father a common Irish drunk.
Unsurprisingly, my brother and sister were
both withdrawn and silent children. My sister suffered from
headaches, weeping eczema and mysterious days of paralysis when
she was unable to get up from her bed.
To outsiders, my father was a genial,
intelligent man and my mother a famous party hostess with three
beautiful children and a perfect diplomatic family. In fact, my
parents were both violent, cruel people and we were all deeply
damaged.
In 1949, my father was posted back to Tien
Sien, in China. I was left with my twin sister in a boarding
school - Leweston, near Sherborne in Dorset - and my brother
accompanied my parents.
Very shortly after they took up their post,
however, my parents were captured again - this time by the
communists - and held under house arrest for three years.
Without them, I felt an abiding sense of
peace and loved my holidays at St Mary's in Uplyme, a holiday
home for children whose parents were abroad. Miss Williams, who
ran the place, was the first adult that I really admired and
respected. She became my mentor.
But this idyll was shattered when I heard
that my parents had been released. I remember being called to
the telephone in the convent to speak to my mother. I had
completely blotted my parents out of my life and so when I heard
her Canadian accent, I just screamed down the phone.
'You're not my mother!' I yelled, all too
aware that the whole circus was about to start again.
When my mother first returned, to a house
outside Axminster, we enjoyed an uneasy truce. I was much taller
than her now, and too big for her to batter.
Instead, she began to list my father's
faults, and the atrocities he had inflicted on us all, as if I
were now her confidante. She would tell me how much she hated
him and that they never should have married.
'But I stayed for you,' she told me. 'I
stayed because I wanted you to go to a private school and enjoy
a comfortable way of life.'
I took the decision that I would have to
stab my father
Once again, she was unleashing her peculiar
brand of emotional cruelty, and placing all the responsibility -
and guilt - on me. It was a pattern of behaviour I would witness
again and again among some of the women in my refuge.
The day my father was due to join us in the
new house, my mother was a nervous wreck. She was crying and
clinging on to me, demanding that I protect her. 'I don't want
him anywhere near me,' she said.
In dysfunctional families, children, no
matter how badly they are treated, will try to take on the
parenting role. For me, this still meant protecting and
comforting my mother.
And so, on the night of my father's return, I
took a large carving knife from the kitchen and went up to my
parents' bedroom, which I peered into through a gap in the door.
They slept in separate, single beds and I took the extraordinary
decision that I would stab him if he tried to force himself on
her.
I was, on reflection, following my mother's
unspoken orders. Remarkably, she had manipulated me to such a
degree that I was now willing to murder for her.
My father certainly tried to talk his way into her bed.
Fortunately, however, he didn't become physical. If he had, he
would now be dead and my life would have turned out very
differently.
In the 1950s, while I was working in Hong Kong, my mother was
diagnosed with terminal cancer. I returned to our house near
Axminster - and found my father unchanged.
By now, he was trying to force my mother to sign her money -
she had received a sizeable inheritance from her father - over
to him. Week after week, in the local cottage hospital, she
refused, and week after week, he ranted and raved at her while
she writhed in pain. I begged the nurses to stop him, but they
said no one could come between a man and his wife.
At first, my mother refused to believe she was dying. But
when my father finally broke her down, and bullied her into
signing the papers, her life began to ebb away in earnest.
She died on September 16, 1958, and my father had the body
brought home and placed in the dining room. That night, as she
lay next door, we sat down to have supper at the table in the
hall.
He made us stand vigil over her visibly decomposing body
After supper, my father ordered us into the dining room,
where my mother's open coffin was draped with a red cloth. My
brother, sister and I begged my father not to remove the cloth,
but when we closed our eyes for a moment to say a prayer for
her, we opened them to be confronted by her pale face. I vividly
remember that there was cotton wool sticking out of her nose.
Every night, we would stand vigil over my mother's body, and
every night she would be exposed to the humiliation of having
her children see her visibly decomposing. At last, six days
later, my father buried her.
I left home the next day and only saw him once more - when I
took his ashes to my mother's grave in 1982.
I only decided to talk about my traumatic childhood last week
- on a BBC radio programme called The House Where I Grew Up -
but I decided long ago I would not repeat the toxic lessons I
learned as a child. Instead, I would become a survivor.
Feminism, I realised, was a lie. Women and men are both
capable of extraordinary cruelty. Indeed, the only thing a child
really needs - two biological parents under one roof - was being
undermined by the very ideology which claimed to speak up for
women's rights.
This country is now on the brink of serious moral collapse.
We must stop demonising men and start healing the rift that
feminism has created between men and women.
Harriet Harman's insidious and manipulative philosophy that
women are always victims and men always oppressors can only
continue this unspeakable cycle of violence. And it's our
children who will suffer.
"Feminism
was a project financed by the Rockefeller family to get Moms
out of the home so children would be raised by the State.
Children will then grow up thinking of the State as their
Father".
Erin Pizzey, who devoted her life
to helping battered wives talks for the first time
about the abuse she suffered at the hands of both
her parents and how it convinced her that
women are
every bit as cruel as men.
Women are less happy nowadays despite 40 years of
feminism, a new study claims. Despite having more
opportunities than ever before, they have a lower
sense
of well-being and life satisfaction, it found.
She has accepted undisclosed libel damages over a
claim in a book by BBC presenter Andrew Marr that she
was a supporter of British
terror group the Angry
Brigade.
All unsold copies of A History of Modern Britain are
being withdrawn after the BBC journalist allegedly
falsely claimed in the book that a women's rights
campaigner had ties to a group of militant bombers.
Erin Pizzey, founder of the battered wives' refuge,
on how militant feminists - with the collusion of
Labour's leading women - hijacked her cause and used it
to try to demonise all men
Exposing the Women's Shelter Industry,
Canada Courtwatch
THE PLANNED DESTRUCTION OF THE FAMILY, ERIN PIZZEY
Just recently a 'battered woman,' for that is how she saw herself, came to me
for help. Her lover, who lived apart from her and her children, had beaten her
up badly and she was forced to go to the hospital. He then took her back to her
own house and stayed with her in order to look after her while her wounds
healed.
'You are not a battered woman,' I said with a sigh. I define a battered woman as
a woman who is a genuine victim of her partner's violence. 'You are a
violence-prone woman, a victim of your own need for violence.' I sighed because
those two sentences uttered twenty-five years ago in my early work at Chiswick
caused me to be hated and despised. I became the nation's conscience. I dared to
say publicly that women can be as violent as men and that women were a great
deal more psychologically violent than men. In this woman's case we have a great
deal of work to do and he needs to find himself a good therapist.
In 1971, inspired by the promise of women journalists and other
media-manipulators, I decided to join the newly founded Women's Movement.
'Sisterhood is powerful' they chanted. 'Sisters unite, no more competing, women
helping women.' It all sounded too good to be true. My first meeting filled me
with doubts. It was held in a very middle-class home in Chiswick and I gazed at
the Mao posters on the wall of the drawing-room. When asked why I was there by
the hostess, I replied that my husband was a television reporter and was very
rarely home and I felt lonely and isolated with my two children. 'Your problem
is not your isolation but your husband. He oppresses you and he is a
capitalist.' I pointed out that she too had a mortgage so she therefore was a
capitalist, and far from oppressing me my husband was baby-sitting so that I
could attend this meeting. Her husband was out at a Union meeting organizing the
Brentford Biscuit factory with the help of his degree in Political Science, to
prepare for the forthcoming revolution.
What the woman didn't know, was that I was the daughter of a diplomat. I was
born in China, and traveled the world with my father. I also-worked in the
Foreign Office and was well aware of the atrocities both in Russia and in China.
Then over cups of tea, we were assured that women were a minority group. I
pointed out that women made up fifty-two per cent of the world's population. I
was given Mao's little red book and SHREW magazine. I took it home and was
horrified at the hatred it spewed against men.
I decided that this organization needed looking at. With both children in school
and time on my hands I went to work for The Women's Liberation Workshop in
Shaftsbury Avenue. I witnessed the women working there tearing open letters and
pocketing the three pounds ten shillings that desperate women were sending in to
join the movement. I tried to answer as many of the letters as I could. Some of
that money went into buying explosives.
Terrorists in the Women's Movement blew up the BBC van outside the Miss World
Contest and the top off the Post office tower. I called in the police. All this
rubbish and rhetoric was to culminate in the up-rising of the 'working classes'
and the death of Capitalism and the destruction of all men. Needless to say
there were virtually no working class women in this movement. Most of the
revolution was fought around middle class dinner tables in grisly Islington.
By now I was very firmly 'the enemy.' Men, at this point, took the whole
movement as a joke but it was no joke, as many homeless men deprived of their
children will tell you. Savaged by feminist lawyers and therapists, men have
routinely been deprived of their homes, their children and their incomes.
I knew that I wanted to fulfill my original dream. Women working with women in
co-operation with men. The idea that we should work with men was anathema to
these women. The Women's Movement was dominated by the Radical Separatist
Movement. They not only hated men but heterosexual women as well. I saw through
their very hidden agenda. I stood on platforms saying that if I had to pay three
pounds ten shillings, meet in cells and call my friends comrade, then they were
asking me to join the Communist Party, which was fine, but don't lie. Don't
collect money under false pretenses. I had plenty of good Communist friends, I
wanted a movement that truly represented women. Not tired hacked-to-death male
politics.
The early collective meetings and conferences involved hundreds of women, mostly
middle-class women bored with their life-styles and they were terrifying. Anyone
brought up in a girls' boarding school as I was, knows how violent and
manipulative women can be. The bullying in the collectives was unabated. No
lipstick, no high heels, no deodorant, I broke all the rules. 'Why do you wear
men's suits and ties,' I asked. 'if you so hate men?' Silly question I suppose.
'We are wearing the symbol of our oppression,' was the humorless reply.
By now I realized through reading the Women's Movement literature that those
thousands of women working in all caring fields, the journalists, the television
makers, were determined to destroy family life in England. [See Communist
Manifesto —WHS] 'Make the personal political,' was one of their many banners. So
thousands of violent and very disturbed women attacked normal happily married
women and our traditional way of life. Secret meetings were held (everything was
done in secret) and I received a letter '.....and the collective decided that
until the whole matter is sorted out, and you have given a statement of this
position to a woman-lawyer, or someone in the N.C.C.L., you should no longer
work in the office or attend meetings of any of the collectives.'
Profoundly depressed by my experiences in the movement, I went off to do what I
always believed would liberate women. A place to gather and to work together in
co-operation with men.
Soon beaten and battered women with their children were coming to me for help.
There was no literature on battered women, so I wrote 'Scream Quietly Or The
Neighbors Will Hear.' I was immediately in trouble because the book was not
'politically correct,' it discussed family violence and I refused to let the
Managing Director politicize my book. By now I was giving the figure of 62 women
out of the first hundred women who came to the refuge were as violent or more
violent than the men they left. Also many were prostitutes taking refuge from
their violent pimps. This infuriated the Women's Movement. I knew that as soon
as I attracted publicity and funding, the Women's Movement which by now
attracted neither, would be beating on my door. When I called a small conference
to help other groups get started, several hundred women with feminists and
radical separatist feminists invaded my conference. They started their usual
bogus rubbish trying to appeal to my mothers, making much use of the phrase
'working classes.' My mothers were not impressed. One of my closest friends at
Chiswick said 'there isn't a working class woman amongst you.' Another slightly
bolder yelled 'go home and get your dildoes.' We left them to battle it out by
themselves. They then formed The National Women's Aid Federation.
This delighted my many enemies at The Home Office and The Department Of Social
Security. My chief enemy at my first meeting was a member of the sisterhood.
'How will you pay for your refuge?' she sniffed. 'I shall pray,' I said. I did
all the time and it was our prayers that sustained Chiswick for all those years.
The Federation used all their contacts in the media (many of them were
journalists) to rubbish me and my work. By now I was writing at home at night.
They came to interview me about my books but the books were never discussed,
only how fat I was or how belligerent I was.
I recently asked The Home Office for their latest report and I was not surprised
to see that my name and 'Scream Quietly,' the first book in the world on wife
battering was missing. I knew from other writers that editors in the publishing
world of London were themselves radical feminists and it was their habit to
dictate their themes to desperate writers, who were then coerced into writing
the editor's book, knowing that should they disobey, they would not be
published. My brother Danny always wrote what he was told to write. He
complained down the telephone to me and finally, just before he died, he said
bitterly 'I have no contracts and no film deals in sight.' He rewrote the four
hundred page synopsis for his book four times to suit his agent and his
publishers.
Throughout all the fighting I kept preaching that family life was and always
will be the foundation of any civilization. Destroy the family and you destroy
the country. I warned that of the violent women with their children coming to
me, virtually none used contraception. My mothers had an average of 5.1
children, meanwhile non-violent families had a 2.5 average. I wrote reports, I
drafted memos, all to no avail. Nobody wanted to hear what I had to say. In the
back of 'Scream Quietly' I listed all the agencies that had failed my families.
I wrote that I was not seeing social workers, I was seeing political activists
with social work degrees. The same went for teachers, and probation officers,
editors of books and magazines. Like a giant cancer this movement dug its crabs
legs into anywhere they could wield their power.
Many women, assisted by weak men, sought to destroy me and my work and I knew
that finally having fought court cases that involved disobeying judge's orders
to save children's lives, I knew I would be ousted from my own refuge. A few men
bravely tried to make their voices heard, realizing the dangers. They too were
excoriated by both men and women. Businessmen in the media, managing directors
of publishing houses, never understood that their editors were lying to them.
Playing the numbers game. 'Who do you think you are?' screamed one feminist
editor. 'I must be somebody,' I replied. 'After all I'm in Debrett's and Who's
Who. You're nobody in publishing.' Another said...'Why can't you write the sort
of books you know I like, Erin...... books about women loving women?' 'I can't,'
I replied. 'I'm a heterosexual writer and all my books celebrate family life.'
Because men looked upon the refuge movement as a 'woman's issue', newspapers
sent women journalists to attack me. I addressed a conference of radical
feminists and asked them why, when I respected their right to practice their
politics and define their own sexuality they denied me my rights to my
heterosexuality, my right to live and work to preserve family life and to enjoy
being at home with my family. That I think being a mother and a grandmother has
given me more joy than any other achievement. I was screamed down and met with
utter hostility.
When I published 'Prone to Violence', a book about my work with violent women
and the children in the refuge, I was picketed by hundreds of banner-waving
women. 'All men are bastards!' read some of the banners. 'All men are rapists!'
shrieked another. 'If those banners said Jews or black people, you would have
arrested those women,' I told the policeman who had come to say that I had to
have a police escort all around England for the book tour.
Hester Lessard, UVic Feminist Law Prof:
Heterosexual View of Parenthood must be ignored
"Trociuk is .. a
disheartening endorsement of biological concepts of parenthood
... flawed .... it legitimizes a heterosexual view of the family. ..
It must be ignored."
Patricia Ireland: Lesbian YWCA Chief & NOW
President
"NOW President Patricia Ireland led the
largest, most visible and most successful feminist organization in the
United States for 10 years, from 1991-2001.
2006-01-19
The Straight slate - Port Moody–Westwood–Port Coquitlam, Mary Woo
Siims, Straight.com;
"Mary Woo Sims, the former chief commissioner of the
BC Human Rights Commission,
is a hero to some in the gay and lesbian community for her record as
a defender and promoter of human rights.
Sims, a motorcycle-riding lesbian, lost a bid last year to
get elected to Coquitlam city council",
Georgia Straight
"Honourable
senators know that I have studied a terrible and pernicious
heart of darkness that has developed in our court system, being
the use of
FALSE ACCUSATIONS in civil justice.
This is the
mischief of litigating parties, usually mothers, suddenly within
the context of divorce and within child custody proceedings
falsely accusing the other party, usually fathers, of the sexual
abuse of their own children. ,,,
These
FALSE ALLEGATIONS are often made with the overt or
covert complicity of their lawyers. They are a lethal weapon in
the business of parental alienation. They are a tool for
achieving sole custody of children and creating fatherlessness."
Former
Senator Nancy Schaefer and her husband Bruce have died from
a single shot wound each. The deaths are being handled as
a 'murder-suicide'. <Ha!> The husband shot once in the chest.
Nancy was shot once in the back. Both shots were
lethal. Two shots, Two Kills
Lawyers consistently estimate the homosexual fraction of
the Law Societies & Judiciaries as "forty-something" percent.
That is, a randomly selected Judge or Lawyer is about thirty
times more likely to be homosexual than the population at large
Sexual psychopath. His
'data' mostly came from sexual psychopaths, sex offenders,
criminals, pedophiles, male prostitutes, and promiscuous
homosexuals. Two of his "co-investigators" were serial
rapists:
Rex King, convicted of 800 counts of child rape involving
both sexes, and
Fritz von Balluseck, an ex-Nazi convicted of the rape-murder
of a ten-year-old girl in Berlin
Kinsey solicited and encouraged pedophiles, at home and abroad,
to sexually violate from 317 to 2,035 infants and children for
his alleged data on normal "child sexuality."
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.
Teachers
would be necessary to stop the present use of our Schools for
Political Indoctrination by Activists. See also
By
I was only five but I knew my mother
didn't like me
Women are less happy nowadays despite 40 years of
feminism, a new study claims. Despite having more
opportunities than ever before, they have a lower
sense
of well-being and life satisfaction, it found. 
