"Honorable
senators know that I have studied a terrible and pernicious
heart of darkness
that has developed in our court system, being the use of
FALSE ACCUSATIONS in civil justice.
"This
is the mischief of litigating parties, usually mothers,
suddenly within the context of divorce and within child
custody proceedings falsely accusing the other party,
usually fathers, of the sexual abuse of their own children.
,,,
"These
FALSE ACCUSATIONS are often made with the overt
or covert complicity of their
lawyers. They are a
lethal weapon in the business of parental alienation. They
are a tool for achieving sole custody of children and
creating fatherlessness."
"Natural
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
"Natural
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage
bill"
16.10 Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to
conform
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal
BREACH OF TRUST"
FYI,
the ideas that the State assigns
Rights &
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from
pre-war Nazi Germany. Under the British system
rights are not State-given, but God Given.
Buying into the Court's position that what
rights remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same
position that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and
Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.
In
"Women and the Process of Constitutional Reform"
McLellan warns that <Horrors!>
"Provincial
Legislatures may impose a presumption of Joint Custody...
and perpetuate the domination of men over women"
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and
they will likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these
days".
This is completely FALSE. The Judges
are Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT
CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
1649, only
PARLIAMENT has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was
only observed and documented by individuals sent out by the
newly Norman Crown after the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the
laws and customs of the various peoples of Britain..
This was done with a view to aggregate existing customs
which may vary across the land, into a unified body of
Laws. The Authority quoted by the Commoners in their
administration of
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
Bible and
principles of
Danelaw
The process of documentation took only a
couple of hundred years, and
the product was a STATIC body of Law which was historical,
popular, and has served in the intervening centuries as a
Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
Instead their position to promote the
"rights" of a "Parent" in the widest sense of the
word, making NO distinction between
NATURAL PARENTS and
wannaabe
Legal Parents. They have bowed to
University of
Victoria's assertion that the SCC's
Trociuk
Decision
"endorses a Heterosexual View of the Family and must be
ignored", legitimizing the ongoing
Child
Trafficking by the State which views
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in
the lucrative Child
Adoption Market They refuse to be hampered by prior
obligations to that pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can
Veto an Adoption.
It appears that many
"Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United
Nations and Liberal
Irwin Cotler's assertion that the
Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent
has "NO RIGHTS",
making the State, not the Natural
Parents the Protector of the Child..
Without Cause or
Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!
"In spite of credible revelations dating back to April 2002
about Bill Graham, a sex addicted bi-sexual sodomizing a 15
year old male prostitute named
Lawrence Metherel,
Paul Martin allowed Graham to remain
Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister - and eventually named
him to the portfolio of Minister of Defense.
"On Sept. 28/2005 a vote was held in Parliament to raise the
age of consent from 14 (one of the lowest age of consents in
the world) to 16 (an age which many still consider too low).
"Bill Graham, Paul Martin, and Anne McLellan, on Sept. 28th,
voted against raising the age of consent to 16
"The Family Courts
are <generally> a bunch of second rate hangers-on
... build each other's businesses through
referrals...Family Law is a <parasitic> self-sustaining
Industry"
Habeas
Corpus : "literally, "you
may have the body". A Habeas
Corpus is a legal writ that protects an individual against arbitrary
imprisonment by requiring that any person arrested be brought before
a court for formal charge. If the charge is considered to be valid,
the person must submit to trial; if not, the person goes free. When
the law is suspended, then individuals can be imprisoned
indefinitely and without charge."
.....
Skeletons in the Closet, a film drawn from the dramatized lives
of families living with a protected
Pedophile and the mental
illness it may create when a loving, faithful, Victim keeps the
Secret. This is shockingly
common. The Secret is their Power -
BREAK IT!
(You would be well advised to stay away from the Public Servant.)
FYI, most of what you hear
about Family Violence is a huge fraud because
World Health Organization
obligates members to:
a) NOT report results of studies which do
not show "expected results", and
b) if "unexpected results do eventually get
reported, they may only be reported with "expert" commentary to
explain away the deviation from the expected result that "Men are
violent" and "Women are their Victims".
The World Health has as a primary Sponsor, the
Rockefeller Foundations, a
Fabian Socialist group
which has as it's aim the conversion of the West to a Soviet style
block which can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.
See Norman Dodd.
It seems any time the Crimes of a
"Friend of the Court" gets forced into the Public Eye, BC Courts
provide their buddy with a
Special Prosecutor to minimize their
sentences and hopefully get them back in business as fast as
possible. Aren't these crooks supposed to receive
Trial By Jury?
Opponents of Equal Parenting like to tell you
that seventy something percent of Custody Cases don't go to Trial,
and are awarded as Sole Custody to Mom BY CONSENT.
What they don't tell you is that in ninety
something percent of Custody Cases that do go to Trial Mom gets Sole
Custody anyway, and Dad has to pay on top of his Lawyer fees, the
Court Costs for having lost his Application. Faced with these
abysmal odds, Dads are commonly told to "Just give her what she
wants so you can have a good relationship with her". Under
such
Duress many Dads foolishly acquiesce .... for
a time at least......
We prefer that Natural Parents NOT sign a Consent
Order that is not completely Equal with respect to Gender, as the
relationship of the divorced couple is greatly destabilized with
each injury to the equality of parental powers .
Pedophile Activists obviously don't go around
telling you what they're up to. Instead they call
themselves "Mentors", "Social
Workers", "Feminists" or "Homosexual Rights Activists". In
Canada, Pedophile Activists have been successful in getting
greater access to children by reducing the
Age
of Consent to ,
and in eliminating a parents "right to know" when the child reaches
the age of
,
replacing them with school counselors and
Social Workers, and by, of course, eradicating fathers from
their children's lives entirely from birth on request by the mother.
With
the recent changes to accommodate homosexual marriage, the right of
natural parents to "parent" their natural children will soon be
removed entirely. Through these statutory changes, the term
"LEGAL PARENT" is replacing the
historic term "NATURAL PARENT"
in Canadian statutes. As a result Natural
Parents can no longer automatically claim to be the Legal Parents of
their own natural children at birth. Instead, to accommodate
the Homosexual Activists' plan to push Natural Parents aside when it
comes to parenting children, the Courts alone now decide who will be
the "parents' of all children born in Canada.
Pedophile
Activists are often lawyers, school counselors, teachers,
Social Workers, Sex Ed teachers,
YWCA leaders,
pastors, Judges, etc. etc. They seek positions with access and
power over Children & Families, and positions to create social and
political change. The publicly undisclosed prevalence of
Pedophile & Homosexual Activists in our civil service has been
attributed to their determined politicism in the many groups like
ACT UP! , the secrecy of the
alliances made in various "secret societies" and sex clubs, and to
Sexual Nepotism in the workplace.
‘This law if passed would make it mandatory
for two parents who are divorcing to discuss
with either a mediator or a judge how they
would divide the time with the children’
–
Raymonde Folco
Maurice Vellacott, MP
Unit 3-844 51st Street East
Saskatoon, SK S7K 5C7 Tel. 306-975-4725, Toll Free 888-844-8886
Fax 306-975-4728
Email: vellam1@parl.gc.ca
www.mauricevellacott.ca
Gender Inequality in Alberta Debate on Dec 10, 2009
"Mr.
Vellacott introduced a
Private Member’s Bill this morning that
would require a presumption of equal
parenting. This is a BILL, not a MOTION.
It’s # is
C-422. Don’t refer to it as M-483 if
contacting others such as politicians or
media about this bill because
M-483 as an equal parenting measure was
terminated with the last election call, as
most of you already know, so nobody will
know what you are talking about if you refer
to it incorrectly. Mr. Vellacott’s
introductory statement in introducing this
bill this morning was as follows (Check
Against Delivery."
"Mr.
Speaker, I am honoured to be introducing a
Private Member’s Bill today which would
direct courts in regard to divorce, to make
equal shared parenting the presumptive
arrangement in the best interests of the
child, except in proven cases of abuse or
neglect.
Over 10 years ago, a Joint House-Senate
committee presented to Parliament a report
entitled “For the Sake of the Children.”
That report urged Parliament to amend the
Divorce Act to make equal shared parenting
the normative determination by courts
dealing with situations of divorce involving
children. This non-partisan recommendation
from that Joint House-Senate was based on
compelling research made available to the
committee members. Over the past ten years,
the best research has continued to
demonstrate the far superior outcomes for
children, in general, when both parents –
mom AND dad – are actively involved in their
children's lives, even if the parents
divorce or separate.
Polling from the past two years demonstrates
overwhelming support from Canadians for
equal shared parenting.
There is, in fact,
slightly more support among women than men
for equal parenting. This strong support
from almost 80% of Canadians exists across
the country, with the strongest regional
support coming from Quebec and Atlantic
Canada.
Canadians claiming to be Liberal and Bloc
supporters, expressed the strongest
endorsement for equal shared parenting, at
80.6% among Liberals and 82.9% among Bloc
Quebecois supporters.
A variety of countries, such as Belgium,
Denmark, Norway, Australia, and various U.S.
states, have implemented equal parenting,
joint custody or shared parenting
presumptive legislation, which has resulted
in lowered court costs, less conflict and
improved social outcomes for the children of
divorce.
This bill is one of the most a-political,
non-partisan pieces of legislation
introduced in this current Parliament. I
look forward to strong support for this
important piece of legislation from all
Members of Parliament who are committed to
the best interests of our Canadian children."
Vellacott resigns as aboriginal committee
chair, May. 10 2006
Conservative
MP Maurice Vellacott
resigned on Wednesday as chairman of the Commons aboriginal
affairs committee, after sparking controversy over remarks he
made about judges and natives.
But another controversial MP was named as the
Conservatives' choice for his replacement: B.C. MP Colin Mayes.
Mayes recently suggested journalists be "hauled off in
handcuffs" for fabricating stories and falsely accusing
citizens, although he later issued a press release to "retract
without reservation" his comments.
Conservative MP Jay Hill said Mayes's
comments were a "rookie mistake."
"Look, Mr. Mayes obviously has apologized for that," he told The
Canadian Press.
Meanwhile, in a letter that Vellacott issued to all members of
Parliament Wednesday, he said he believed his departure was the
best decision he could make. "I'm saddened as I
voluntarily remove myself from this committee, in that I had
hoped, before this earthly life is over, in some modest way, to
contribute to improving living conditions for First Nations,
Metis and Inuit. I submit to a sovereign God to provide me that
opportunity at some point in the future," Vellacott says.
Vellacott also blamed Liberal partisanship for his resignation,
which he said "will submerge aboriginal issues and make it
extremely difficult to accomplish anything productive on behalf
of our aboriginal brothers and sisters in this committee, in
this Parliament."
The Liberals had tabled a non-confidence motion before the
parliamentary committee seeking Vellacott's resignation, which
would have taken place on Wednesday afternoon. The motion
had been virtually guaranteed approval with the backing of the
NDP and Bloc Quebecois.
"I am told that Mr. Vellacott has realized that it would be best
to step down rather than face the humiliation of the vote,"
CTV's Ottawa Bureau Chief Robert Fife reported.
Supreme Court of Canada steps in
The Saskatchewan MP drew criticism for suggestions he made over
the weekend that Supreme Court judges play god with the law.
Chief
Justice Beverley McLachlin
"herself actually said that when they step into (a judicial
activist) role, all of a sudden there's some mystical kind of
power that comes over them by which everything they ever decreed
is not to be questioned and they actually have these discerning
and almost prophetic abilities
to be able to come and know the mind of the public and they take
on almost these godlike powers," Vellacott told a
Canadian broadcaster.
"She
said that herself. I didn't say that."
The statement prompted the Supreme Court of Canada to take the
unusual step of denying his claims.
Vellacott later released a statement
conceding "McLachlin did not literally use those words" and he
expressed his "apologies in this regard."
Though he has since withdrawn some of his remarks, the
opposition is still fuming.
"Why
did it take the condemnation of the Canadian Bar Association,
the chief justice of the Supreme Court,
aboriginal leaders and a host of other Canadians to get this
prime minister and this member to act in the best interests of
Canada?" Interim Liberal
<PEDOPHILE> leader Bill Graham asked Prime Minister
Stephen Harper during question period on Wednesday.
Harper
responded by lobbing criticism back at
Graham, suggesting there
were critics of the judicial system within the Liberal party.
"Obviously if the
leader of the opposition believes someone with the views on
judicial activism of the member of Saskatoon-Wanuskewin
shouldn't chair a parliamentary committee, surely he believes
they should not be senior critics in his own caucus,"
Harper said.
On Tuesday, the Liberals called for Harper to ask Vellacott to
step down. Harper shot down that demand, saying Liberals
have made far more serious comments in the past about judges
than Vellacott.
Vellacott's appointment to the post of committee chairman
sparked controversy because the MP had defended two Saskatoon
policemen convicted of driving a native man out of town and
leaving him to find his way home in frigid temperatures.
Graham said Tuesday that it is "outrageous
that someone who holds such stereotypical views of Aboriginal
people was chosen by the prime minister to play a leadership
role in addressing their issues."
Opposition politicians aren't the only ones angry over
Vellacott's comments about judges.
The
Canadian Bar Association
issued a statement calling on Harper to force Vellacott's
immediate resignation, saying his ill-informed remarks about the
chief justice of Canada undermine public confidence in the
justice system.
In a letter to Harper, bar association president Brian Tabor
said Vellacott's statements "demonstrate an inability to play a
leadership role on any matter related to the administration of
justice."
Note: It is the
Canadian Bar Association,
not Vellacott who is out of line here, and Tabor the one who
should be resigning. What gives any Law Society, a
creation of an Act of Parliament the right to demand the removal
of an elected Parliamentarian?
Instead
their position to promote the "rights" of a
"Parent" in the widest sense of the word, making
NO distinction between
NATURAL PARENTS and wannaabe
Legal Parents. They have bowed to
University of
Victoria's assertion that the SCC's
Trociuk Decision
"endorses a Heterosexual View of the Family and must be ignored",
legitimizing the ongoing
Child
Trafficking by the State which views
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in the
lucrative Child Adoption Market They
refuse to be hampered by prior obligations to that pesky Natural
Parent who thinks they can
Veto an Adoption.
It appears that many
"Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United
Nations and Liberal Irwin
Cotler's assertion that the
Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent has
"NO RIGHTS", making
the State, not the Natural Parents
the Protector of the Child..
Without Cause or Consent,
no Child shall be
removed from a Natural Parent!!!
Equal Parenting Roundups for Natural Parents' Rights
An
"Equal Parenting Roundup" is a gathering of all the
disparate parental rights groups that are within driving
distance of one another. Whereas any group can call an "Ad
Hoc" Roundup with their neihbors, we hope you will have at least
one annual EP Roundup
an incorporate it into the Equal
Parenting Trek
An
Equal Parenting Roundup is an exercise in your Freedom of
Assembly and Freedom of
Speech and Freedom of Assembly, following some of the
traditions that
established our
Supremacy of
Parliament. Ideally, you will want be evangelical
about your Roundup, you can add to it's end a Free Man's
March
"Natural
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
"Natural
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"
16.10
Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to conform
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal BREACH
OF TRUST"
FYI,
the ideas that the State assigns
Rights & Responsibilities
to it's Citizen is straight from pre-war Nazi Germany.
Under the British system rights are not State-given, but God
Given.
Buying into the Court's position that what rights
remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same position
that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and Canadian Children
are at birth the property of the Courts.
Presently, the burden of proof is on the Accused to prove
themselves innocent (unless you are in a Criminal Court), Rare is the Judge who enforces Perjury laws against a
woman.
Born an English Catholic, Fawkes left Britain to fight as a
Mercenary for the Spanish. He later returned secretly to
England from France to Assassinate the newly Protestant
King
James I in what
has been called the
"Gunpowder Plot"
of 1605 .
It is inconceivable that the
Jesuits and
Cardinal Richelieu were not
fully knowledgeable and participant in the Operation..
"This study analyzes family law decisions at the Ontario Court of
Appeal from the mid 1990’s to the mid 2000’s. Records from 7 judges are compared
for over 140 family law cases. ...
It can be concluded
a man had a 96.4 % chance of losing on all issues, but a
woman had a 92.9 % chance of winning on at least some issues when appearing
before
Justice
Rosalie Abella .."
The Courts and other
Law professionals are
firstly Clerks
and Stewards of WRITTEN and
histori
British Common Law having since 1649NO
LEGISLATIVE POWERS.
The Courts, the Law Societies and many other Offices
of the public service are themselves Creations of Parliament by
virtue of PARLIAMENTARYSTATUTE. They cannont be anything other than
SUBORDINATE
to Parliament. The Courts and the
Law Societies have no
Jurisdiction other than that delegated to them by Parliament.
The Court's role is to
ADMINISTER the
Statutory Laws, tested for "Fairness" against the
historic benchmark of British Common Law, but always with
NO LEGISLATIVE POWERS and
always witout capacity to create Law.
In
recent years, Courts and Lawyers have brazenly referred to Judges Orders as
"Case Law", in what is clearly a Criminal Breach of
Trust, that has yet to be successfully struck down by Parliament.
"Conservatives are committed to Shared Parenting. The
national party “Policy Declaration” that was passed by delegates
at our March 2005 Montreal convention
says
clearly that: Shared Parenting: is an objective of the
Conservative Party of Canada.
A Conservative
Government will make the necessary changes to the Divorce Act to
ensure that in the event of a marital breakdown, the Divorce Act
will allow both parents and all grandparents to maintain a
meaningful relationship with their children and grandchildren,
unless it is clearly demonstrated not to be in the best
interests of the children".
"I am writing on behalf of
Darrin Bruce White. I am the oldest of his four
children. My name is
Ashlee A D Barnett-White. ...
No one would listen to my father , no one
would give him a chance to speak. ... My dad was an abused
husband, he was abused by his wife, and the justice system.
... He was a kind man who fought a good fight but no matter
what he did or said, he could never win with this system.
Things need to change for all fathers going through this
same thing. We need to help, too many kids go without a
father because of this , too many kids are hurt."
Ashlee A D Barnett-White, Eldest Daughter
He was also paying $439 a month to support an
older
child from a previous marriage. He had to take stress leave
from his job as a train engineer for BC Rail. Master Baker
ordered Darren out of his home on two days notice.
"Honourable
senators know that I have studied a terrible and pernicious
heart of darkness that has developed in our court system, being
the use of
FALSE ACCUSATIONS in civil justice.
This is the
mischief of litigating parties, usually mothers, suddenly within
the context of divorce and within child custody proceedings
falsely accusing the other party, usually fathers, of the sexual
abuse of their own children. ,,,
These
FALSE ALLEGATIONS are often made with the overt or
covert complicity of their lawyers. They are a lethal weapon in
the business of parental alienation. They are a tool for
achieving sole custody of children and creating fatherlessness."
Canadian Law Societies' Failure to Self Regulate on
Corruption
Law Society Members permitted to Lie in Court
To each of the Professional Societies are
delegated by Statute of Parliament the powers of Self-Licensing
and Self-Regulation. These powers of Self Regulation are
created in the
Law Society Acts, the
Professional Engineers Acts; the
Judges Acts and so forth. Being creations of
Parliament, the the created Societies are inherently
subordinate to Parliament.
We are sorry to see Mr. Galloway was not re-elected after his
offices were targeted by
Homosexual Activists for repeated demonstrations in front of
the Constituency Offices during the Campaign. Many
pro-family MPs were attacked in that same fashion, and
subsequently lost re-election along with Mr. Galloway. To
see what the gays are doing, just Google
Roger Galloway, gay - Google Search
“I’m pushing for
equality —both parents should have equal rights and equal access
to their child,”
Hill said. “The courts seem to
start from the premise that somehow fathers aren’t responsible
parents. But both parents are deemed good parents as long as the
marriage lasts; why are they not when the marriage ends?”
Jay has introduced
Bill C-245, An Act to amend the Divorce Act (shared
parenting) This bill would ensure that courts grant
custody of a child to both divorcing spouses unless there exists
evidence that it would not be in the best interests of the
child. The bill includes the recommendations of the Joint
House of Commons-Senate Subcommittee on Custody and Access which
the Liberals have essentially shelved.
In
"Women and the Process of Constitutional Reform"
McLellan warns that
<Horrors!>
"Provincial
Legislatures may impose a presumption of Joint
Custody... and perpetuate the domination of men over
women"
“I’m pushing for
equality —both parents should have equal rights and equal access
to their child,”
Hill said. “The courts seem to
start from the premise that somehow fathers aren’t responsible
parents. But both parents are deemed good parents as long as the
marriage lasts; why are they not when the marriage ends?”
Jay has introduced
Bill C-245, An Act to amend the Divorce Act (shared
parenting) This bill would ensure that courts grant
custody of a child to both divorcing spouses unless there exists
evidence that it would not be in the best interests of the
child. The bill includes the recommendations of the Joint
House of Commons-Senate Subcommittee on Custody and Access which
the Liberals have essentially shelved.
"Conservatives are committed to Shared Parenting. The
national party “Policy Declaration” that was passed by delegates
at our March 2005 Montreal convention
says
clearly that: Shared Parenting: is an objective of the
Conservative Party of Canada.
A Conservative
Government will make the necessary changes to the Divorce Act to
ensure that in the event of a marital breakdown, the Divorce Act
will allow both parents and all grandparents to maintain a
meaningful relationship with their children and grandchildren,
unless it is clearly demonstrated not to be in the best
interests of the children".
“I’m pushing for
equality —both parents should have equal rights and equal access
to their child,”
Hill said. “The courts seem to
start from the premise that somehow fathers aren’t responsible
parents. But both parents are deemed good parents as long as the
marriage lasts; why are they not when the marriage ends?”
Jay has introduced
Bill C-245, An Act to amend the Divorce Act (shared
parenting) This bill would ensure that courts grant
custody of a child to both divorcing spouses unless there exists
evidence that it would not be in the best interests of the
child. The bill includes the recommendations of the Joint
House of Commons-Senate Subcommittee on Custody and Access which
the Liberals have essentially shelved.
Presently, the burden of proof is on the Accused to prove
themselves innocent (unless you are in a Criminal Court), Rare is the Judge who enforces Perjury laws against a
woman.
In
"Women and the Process of Constitutional Reform"
McLellan warns that
<Horrors!>
"Provincial
Legislatures may impose a presumption of Joint
Custody... and perpetuate the domination of men over
women"
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.
