"Natural
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
"Natural
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage
bill"
16.10 Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to
conform
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal
BREACH OF TRUST"
FYI,
the ideas that the State assigns
Rights &
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from
pre-war Nazi Germany. Under the British system
rights are not State-given, but God Given.
Buying into the Court's position that what
rights remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same
position that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and
Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.
In
"Women and the Process of Constitutional Reform"
McLellan warns that <Horrors!>
"Provincial
Legislatures may impose a presumption of Joint Custody...
and perpetuate the domination of men over women"
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and
they will likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these
days".
This is completely FALSE. The Judges
are Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT
CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
1649, only
PARLIAMENT has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was
only observed and documented by individuals sent out by the
newly Norman Crown after the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the
laws and customs of the various peoples of Britain..
This was done with a view to aggregate existing customs
which may vary across the land, into a unified body of
Laws. The Authority quoted by the Commoners in their
administration of
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
Bible and
principles of
Danelaw
The process of documentation took only a
couple of hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body
of Law which was historical, popular, and has served in the
intervening centuries as a Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
Instead their position to promote the
"rights" of a "Parent" in the widest sense of the
word, making NO distinction between
NATURAL PARENTS and
wannaabe
Legal Parents. They have bowed to
University of
Victoria's assertion that the SCC's
Trociuk
Decision
"endorses a Heterosexual View of the Family and must be
ignored", legitimizing the ongoing
Child
Trafficking by the State which views
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in
the lucrative Child
Adoption Market They refuse to be hampered by prior
obligations to that pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can
Veto an Adoption.
It appears that many
"Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United
Nations and Liberal
Irwin Cotler's assertion that the
Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent
has "NO RIGHTS",
making the State, not the Natural
Parents the Protector of the Child..
Without Cause or
Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!
"In spite of credible revelations dating back to April 2002
about Bill Graham, a sex addicted bi-sexual sodomizing a 15
year old male prostitute named
Lawrence Metherel,
Paul Martin allowed Graham to remain
Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister - and eventually named
him to the portfolio of Minister of Defense.
"On Sept. 28/2005 a vote was held in Parliament to raise the
age of consent from 14 (one of the lowest age of consents in
the world) to 16 (an age which many still consider too low).
"Bill Graham, Paul Martin, and Anne McLellan, on Sept. 28th,
voted against raising the age of consent to 16
"The Family Courts
are <generally> a bunch of second rate hangers-on
... build each other's businesses through
referrals...Family Law is a <parasitic> self-sustaining
Industry"
Habeas
Corpus : "literally, "you
may have the body". A Habeas
Corpus is a legal writ that protects an individual against arbitrary
imprisonment by requiring that any person arrested be brought before
a court for formal charge. If the charge is considered to be valid,
the person must submit to trial; if not, the person goes free. When
the law is suspended, then individuals can be imprisoned
indefinitely and without charge."
.....
Skeletons in the Closet, a film drawn from the dramatized lives
of families living with a protected
Pedophile and the mental
illness it may create when a loving, faithful, Victim keeps the
Secret. This is shockingly
common. The Secret is their Power -
BREAK IT!
(You would be well advised to stay away from the Public Servant.)
PAS = Parental Alienation Syndrome
Recovered Adult Child of Washington's Crooked Family
Courts
"The Family
Courts are a bunch of second rate hangers-on
... build each other's businesses through
referrals...Family Law is a <parasitic> self-sustaining
Industry"
"Dear
Senators:
For over thirty years I have practiced family law in Ontario and
during that time have watched the development of the law and the
dramatically changed social conditions which have not only seen
a very high percentage of married women move into the work force
in most every area but have also seen a significant narrowing of
the income differentials between men and women. During that same
period I have watched spousal social expectations change in that
husbands have embraced a full participation in all aspects of
family functions, particularly in the nurturing and raising of
their children."
"Changes
to the divorce law have rarely kept pace with changing attitudes
and,
despite the gender neutral language of the
Divorce Act, its actual implementation in the areas of child
custody and child support has continued to be marked by an
entrenched systemic gender bias that `mother knows best and
father pays best.' The administration of justice does not treat
spouses equally when it comes to assigning child custody. By and
large, custody is almost always assigned to mothers and the most
fathers can hope for is a generous access order. Where fathers
interfere with custody orders they will ordinarily bear the full
weight of the law while mothers who flaunt access orders will,
by and large, receive judicial admonitions with usually little
other consequence.
Section 16(10) of the Divorce Act
requires courts to take into consideration the willingness of
the person for whom custody is sought to facilitate contact of
the child with each spouse. Practicing family law lawyers know
that
this Section is almost never
invoked."
2006-08-26
It is Time to Eliminate Status of Women;
"Feminists who claim to speak for me irritate me. When they
use taxpayer money to do it, it sends me through the roof.
Status of Women is a government agency that does
precisely that. The agency's name is somewhat of a misnomer,
it should be called the Radical Feminist agency, because
that's exactly what it is."
"I
would just like to bring to your attention a petition I am
addressing to Minister Flaherty to de-fund Status of Women
Canada:
Eliminate Funding for Status of Women Please pass
it on to your contacts. God Bless, Suzanne."
Thanks,
Suzanne. NOTE to Parents: If you have
anything to loose in Family Court, we recommend you DO NOT give
the
Enemy your personal information, as happens when you sign these
online Petitions. We find your political views are
commonly used in Family Court as evidence to justify
taking your children away.
If
you never sign a
Master Joyce Guardianship Model (or any
other non-equal
Parenting Agreement), your kids'
Custodial Parent, Step-Parent, Teacher,
Social Worker, or
Pastor
can never point to your Signature and tell
them that you didn't want them or that you
gave them up BY CONSENT.
Always
MAKE THE JUDGE SIGN the disgusting Sole
Custody Order and reap the consequences
later. Meanwhile, we hope
estranged Dads can look forward to a Happy
Reunion with your children in not too many
years.
We hope you can see through the
Femi-Narcissist deceptions of some of these
Speakers' and see the real context for which a
solution
is demanded, that is the
Equal Parenting
solution. The most common scenario in Parental Alienation,
commonly calls "PAS" is when Mom and her Cohort of Social
Workers and Police levels
FALSE ACCUSATIONS of ABUSE against Dad to get
Sole Custody, Social Status, or government funding. This
puts Dad immediately into the position of being Alienated from
his younger children, and
having to "Prove a Negative", which any educated person will
know is IMPOSSIBLE.
This scenario is so common, we believe it to be
NORMAL!.
Few Canadians are aware that RCMP are
instructed in their Manual of Practice to ignore any evidence of
which Spouse is attacking which when attending a Domestic
Violence call, such as which spouse is bleeding, and which is
holding the knife.
RCMP are instead instructed by RCMP Policy to arrest instead the
"Heaviest" spouse. Guess who that is!!?
The stigma and it's concomitant PAS Dad then
suffers of being "arrested for "Domestic Abuse" and hauled off
before the eyes of their younger children and neighbors can
never really be expunged.
BTW, we doubt RCMP would haul off Mom, even
when SHE is the heaviest, since the Courts have clearly given
Moms a "License to Kill" Dads
.
We know of a case in which even the teenage children were
Witnesses on the scene, and insisted with the Attending Officer
that it was MOM who was the Attacker of DAD, and that the whole
event had been staged. The Attending Officer (female)
didn't want to arrest Dad, but her RCMP Supervisor
insisted by phone she leave Attacker-Mom in the house with the
boys and bring Dad in. RCMP we've asked about this justify
the Practice to us saying "It is a woman's responsibility
to defend herself". (Try asking YOUR local RCMP to
see if they respond the same way.) In later Criminal proceedings
the Teenager's Testimony was regularly lost, disallowed in
Court, and was only retrieved finally through the Freedom of
|Information Act. We have to ask what message is
told these Teenagers entering adulthood, when their father is
wrongfully imprisoned, prosecuted, and their Testimonies to
defend him are disallowed in Court? What will be their
view of the Authorities when they are adults. Sadly, we
think it will be far more accurate than the typical high
schooler pumped with Femi-Narcissist propaganda, learning early
that we are already living in a Police State..
In BC, if a Mom claims "Abuse" by Dad on her
Legal Aide Application, she is guaranteed Legal Aide services.
We already KNOW that only 3-4% of the women in "Women's
Shelters" who claim "Abuse" by Dad to gain entrance are actually
being Abused. This is probably a good estimate of the
fraction of Mom's getting BC Legal Aide by making FALSE
ACCUSATIONS of Dad,
Parental Alienation Syndrome IS real, and is a THE form of
Stockholm Syndrome manufactured in the Family Court and
Public School setting when Sole Custody is ordered. It is hard
not to conclude that the prevalence of Sole Custody awards
is intentional, not only because of the immediate Social Status
and Market, Sole Custody Orders give Judges, Lawyers, Social
Workers, Child Support Collection Contactors and Teachers, but
there is an concerted effort by these same Offenders in
eradicating our next generation's ability to resist the
FASCIST and TOTALITARIAN Society
they are constructing.
Children in involuntary Sole Custody without cause, are
suffering PAS and being raised in an
inherently Tyrannical
environment of the Feminist CULT. This is directly
analogous to a Child being raised in a sexually abusive home
which is also being
emotionally destroyed by the
Stockholm Syndrome and incapable without intervention to
resist the Perpetrators.
To remove a Natural Parents rights to custody
for reporting the appearance of sexual abuse is an outrageous
example of
Malicious
Prosecution, the greatest Beneficiary of which can
only be Pedophile (if they exist) and his/her
NAMBLA and
NAWGLA pals in the BC Courts
and Family Law community. The
Family Courts of
Prince George, BC and
Whistler Village, BC the home of the
2010 Winter Olympics spring immediately to mind.
Circumstances in which there is alleged sexual abuse DEMAND
Equal Parenting
until such time as PHYSICAL evidence is shown by MEDICAL
professionals, or the Child is old enough, say around ten, to be
able to give an account which cannot be manipulated by the
potentially alienating parent.
Presently, the burden of proof is on the Accused to prove
themselves innocent (unless you are in a Criminal Court), Rare is the Judge who enforces Perjury laws against a
woman.
1.
The Bottom Layer: The Initial Equal Parenting Agreement
Initial Equal Parenting Agreement creating full time, all time
equality of both natural parents, subordinate to no third parties (a
Constitutional right ignored by most Family Courts); a series of
tentative
Parenting Timetables for each year and statement of intent, or
"Wishes"; the requirement that the tentative Parenting Timetable laid
out there will be reviewed and finalized annually and incorporated into
the
Annual Parenting Supplement. Parental authority and discretion
is always equal and unaffected by inequalities of Parenting Time
allocations.
3.
Top Layer: Autonomy of Both Equal Parents on all matters not
previously Constrained.
Parenting Timetable alternates all residual parenting questions
between the two otherwise equal parents who are subordinate to no third
parties. Full autonomy of each parent during their Parenting Time
as allotted in the agreed Parenting Timetable on all residual parenting
questions not previously constrained by Covenants in the initial Equal
Parenting Agreement, or the current Annual Parenting Supplement.
Full discretion on residual parenting with the Timetabled Parent, but
flexibility encouraged and provided by Ad Hoc Agreements.
4.
Icing on the Cake.....
Forget about the Courts and your Ex, and go have fun with your kids!!!
"Natural
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
"Natural
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"
16.10
Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to conform
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal BREACH
OF TRUST"
FYI,
the ideas that the State assigns
Rights &
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from pre-war
Nazi Germany. Under the British system rights are
not State-given, but God Given.
Buying into the Court's position that what rights
remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same position
that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and Canadian Children
are at birth the property of the Courts.
"SEATTLE - A man shot and killed by officers after he brandished
an inert <child's plastic> grenade at
Seattle's new Federal Courthouse Monday was described as
angry about child support rulings, police said. ... Court records
indicated his
wages had been garnished in a child support case. ... He
was shot
twice by two veteran Seattle Police Department officers. ..."
"Lohstroh, a 41-year-old emergency-room doctor, was shot in
the back Friday when he went to pick up his two sons at their mother's
home. Police say the 10-year-old boy climbed into the back of his
father's sport utility vehicle, fired a pistol several times through the
back of the driver's seat and then ran back inside the home."
Lawyers consistently estimate the homosexual fraction of
the Law Societies & Judiciaries as "forty-something" percent.
That is,
a randomly selected Judge or Lawyer is about thirty
TIMES more likely to be homosexual than the population at large
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.
and Family Law community. The
Family Courts of
