senators know that I have studied a terrible and pernicious
heart of darkness
that has developed in our court system, being the use of
FALSE ACCUSATIONS in civil justice.
is the mischief of litigating parties, usually mothers,
suddenly within the context of divorce and within child
custody proceedings falsely accusing the other party,
usually fathers, of the sexual abuse of their own children.
FALSE ACCUSATIONS are often made with the overt
or covert complicity of their
lawyers. They are a
lethal weapon in the business of parental alienation. They
are a tool for achieving sole custody of children and
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage
16.10 Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal
BREACH OF TRUST"
the ideas that the State assigns
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from
pre-war Nazi Germany. Under the British system
rights are not State-given, but God Given.
Buying into the Court's position that what
rights remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same
position that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and
Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and
they will likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these
This is completely FALSE. The Judges
are Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT
CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
PARLIAMENT has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was
only observed and documented by individuals sent out by the
newly Norman Crown after the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the
laws and customs of the various peoples of Britain..
This was done with a view to aggregate existing customs
which may vary across the land, into a unified body of
Laws. The Authority quoted by the Commoners in their
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
The process of documentation took only a
couple of hundred years, and
the product was a STATIC body of Law which was historical,
popular, and has served in the intervening centuries as a
Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
Corpus : "literally, "you
may have the body". A Habeas
Corpus is a legal writ that protects an individual against arbitrary
imprisonment by requiring that any person arrested be brought before
a court for formal charge. If the charge is considered to be valid,
the person must submit to trial; if not, the person goes free. When
the law is suspended, then individuals can be imprisoned
indefinitely and without charge."
Skeletons in the Closet, a film drawn from the dramatized lives
of families living with a protected
Pedophile and the mental
illness it may create when a loving, faithful, Victim keeps the
Secret. This is shockingly
common. The Secret is their Power -
(You would be well advised to stay away from the Public Servant.)
a) NOT report results of studies which do
not show "expected results", and
b) if "unexpected results do eventually get
reported, they may only be reported with "expert" commentary to
explain away the deviation from the expected result that "Men are
violent" and "Women are their Victims".
The World Health has as a primary Sponsor, the
Rockefeller Foundations, a
Fabian Socialist group
which has as it's aim the conversion of the West to a Soviet style
block which can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.
See Norman Dodd.
Opponents of Equal Parenting like to tell you
that seventy something percent of Custody Cases don't go to Trial,
and are awarded as Sole Custody to Mom BY CONSENT.
What they don't tell you is that in ninety
something percent of Custody Cases that do go to Trial Mom gets Sole
Custody anyway, and Dad has to pay on top of his Lawyer fees, the
Court Costs for having lost his Application. Faced with these
abysmal odds, Dads are commonly told to "Just give her what she
wants so you can have a good relationship with her". Under
Duress many Dads foolishly acquiesce .... for
a time at least......
We prefer that Natural Parents NOT sign a Consent
Order that is not completely Equal with respect to Gender, as the
relationship of the divorced couple is greatly destabilized with
each injury to the equality of parental powers .
Pedophile Activists obviously don't go around
telling you what they're up to. Instead they call
themselves "Mentors", "Social
Workers", "Feminists" or "Homosexual Rights Activists". In
Canada, Pedophile Activists have been successful in getting
greater access to children by reducing the
of Consent to ,
and in eliminating a parents "right to know" when the child reaches
the age of
replacing them with school counselors and
Social Workers, and by, of course, eradicating fathers from
their children's lives entirely from birth on request by the mother.
the recent changes to accommodate homosexual marriage, the right of
natural parents to "parent" their natural children will soon be
removed entirely. Through these statutory changes, the term
"LEGAL PARENT" is replacing the
historic term "NATURAL PARENT"
in Canadian statutes. As a result Natural
Parents can no longer automatically claim to be the Legal Parents of
their own natural children at birth. Instead, to accommodate
the Homosexual Activists' plan to push Natural Parents aside when it
comes to parenting children, the Courts alone now decide who will be
the "parents' of all children born in Canada.
Activists are often lawyers, school counselors, teachers,
Social Workers, Sex Ed teachers,
pastors, Judges, etc. etc. They seek positions with access and
power over Children & Families, and positions to create social and
political change. The publicly undisclosed prevalence of
Pedophile & Homosexual Activists in our civil service has been
attributed to their determined politicism in the many groups like
ACT UP! , the secrecy of the
alliances made in various "secret societies" and sex clubs, and to
Sexual Nepotism in the workplace.
PAS = Parental Alienation Syndrome
Recovered Adult Child of Washington's Crooked Family
For over thirty years I have practiced family law in Ontario and
during that time have watched the development of the law and the
dramatically changed social conditions which have not only seen
a very high percentage of married women move into the work force
in most every area but have also seen a significant narrowing of
the income differentials between men and women. During that same
period I have watched spousal social expectations change in that
husbands have embraced a full participation in all aspects of
family functions, particularly in the nurturing and raising of
to the divorce law have rarely kept pace with changing attitudes
despite the gender neutral language of the
Divorce Act, its actual implementation in the areas of child
custody and child support has continued to be marked by an
entrenched systemic gender bias that `mother knows best and
father pays best.' The administration of justice does not treat
spouses equally when it comes to assigning child custody. By and
large, custody is almost always assigned to mothers and the most
fathers can hope for is a generous access order. Where fathers
interfere with custody orders they will ordinarily bear the full
weight of the law while mothers who flaunt access orders will,
by and large, receive judicial admonitions with usually little
Section 16(10) of the Divorce Act
requires courts to take into consideration the willingness of
the person for whom custody is sought to facilitate contact of
the child with each spouse. Practicing family law lawyers know
this Section is almost never
It is Time to Eliminate Status of Women;
"Feminists who claim to speak for me irritate me. When they
use taxpayer money to do it, it sends me through the roof.
Status of Women is a government agency that does
precisely that. The agency's name is somewhat of a misnomer,
it should be called the Radical Feminist agency, because
that's exactly what it is."
would just like to bring to your attention a petition I am
addressing to Minister Flaherty to de-fund Status of Women
Eliminate Funding for Status of Women Please pass
it on to your contacts. God Bless, Suzanne."
Suzanne. NOTE to Parents: If you have
anything to loose in Family Court, we recommend you DO NOT give
Enemy your personal information, as happens when you sign these
online Petitions. We find your political views are
commonly used in Family Court as evidence to justify
taking your children away.
you never sign a
Master Joyce Guardianship Model (or any
Parenting Agreement), your kids'
Custodial Parent, Step-Parent, Teacher,
Social Worker, or
can never point to your Signature and tell
them that you didn't want them or that you
gave them up BY CONSENT.
MAKE THE JUDGE SIGN the disgusting Sole
Custody Order and reap the consequences
later. Meanwhile, we hope
estranged Dads can look forward to a Happy
Reunion with your children in not too many
We hope you can see through the
Femi-Narcissist deceptions of some of these
Speakers' and see the real context for which a
is demanded, that is the
solution. The most common scenario in Parental Alienation,
commonly calls "PAS" is when Mom and her Cohort of Social
Workers and Police levels
FALSE ACCUSATIONS of ABUSE against Dad to get
Sole Custody, Social Status, or government funding. This
puts Dad immediately into the position of being Alienated from
his younger children, and
having to "Prove a Negative", which any educated person will
know is IMPOSSIBLE.
This scenario is so common, we believe it to be
Few Canadians are aware that RCMP are
instructed in their Manual of Practice to ignore any evidence of
which Spouse is attacking which when attending a Domestic
Violence call, such as which spouse is bleeding, and which is
holding the knife.
RCMP are instead instructed by RCMP Policy to arrest instead the
"Heaviest" spouse. Guess who that is!!?
The stigma and it's concomitant PAS Dad then
suffers of being "arrested for "Domestic Abuse" and hauled off
before the eyes of their younger children and neighbors can
never really be expunged.
BTW, we doubt RCMP would haul off Mom, even
when SHE is the heaviest, since the Courts have clearly given
Moms a "License to Kill" Dads
We know of a case in which even the teenage children were
Witnesses on the scene, and insisted with the Attending Officer
that it was MOM who was the Attacker of DAD, and that the whole
event had been staged. The Attending Officer (female)
didn't want to arrest Dad, but her RCMP Supervisor
insisted by phone she leave Attacker-Mom in the house with the
boys and bring Dad in. RCMP we've asked about this justify
the Practice to us saying "It is a woman's responsibility
to defend herself". (Try asking YOUR local RCMP to
see if they respond the same way.) In later Criminal proceedings
the Teenager's Testimony was regularly lost, disallowed in
Court, and was only retrieved finally through the Freedom of
|Information Act. We have to ask what message is
told these Teenagers entering adulthood, when their father is
wrongfully imprisoned, prosecuted, and their Testimonies to
defend him are disallowed in Court? What will be their
view of the Authorities when they are adults. Sadly, we
think it will be far more accurate than the typical high
schooler pumped with Femi-Narcissist propaganda, learning early
that we are already living in a Police State..
In BC, if a Mom claims "Abuse" by Dad on her
Legal Aide Application, she is guaranteed Legal Aide services.
We already KNOW that only 3-4% of the women in "Women's
Shelters" who claim "Abuse" by Dad to gain entrance are actually
being Abused. This is probably a good estimate of the
fraction of Mom's getting BC Legal Aide by making FALSE
ACCUSATIONS of Dad,
Parental Alienation Syndrome IS real, and is a THE form of
Stockholm Syndrome manufactured in the Family Court and
Public School setting when Sole Custody is ordered. It is hard
not to conclude that the prevalence of Sole Custody awards
is intentional, not only because of the immediate Social Status
and Market, Sole Custody Orders give Judges, Lawyers, Social
Workers, Child Support Collection Contactors and Teachers, but
there is an concerted effort by these same Offenders in
eradicating our next generation's ability to resist the
FASCIST and TOTALITARIAN Society
they are constructing.
Children in involuntary Sole Custody without cause, are
suffering PAS and being raised in an
environment of the Feminist CULT. This is directly
analogous to a Child being raised in a sexually abusive home
which is also being
emotionally destroyed by the
Stockholm Syndrome and incapable without intervention to
resist the Perpetrators.
To remove a Natural Parents rights to custody
for reporting the appearance of sexual abuse is an outrageous
Prosecution, the greatest Beneficiary of which can
only be Pedophile (if they exist) and his/her
NAWGLA pals in the BC Courts
and Family Law community. The
Family Courts of
Prince George, BC and
Whistler Village, BC the home of the
2010 Winter Olympics spring immediately to mind.
Circumstances in which there is alleged sexual abuse DEMAND
until such time as PHYSICAL evidence is shown by MEDICAL
professionals, or the Child is old enough, say around ten, to be
able to give an account which cannot be manipulated by the
potentially alienating parent.
The Bottom Layer: The Initial Equal Parenting Agreement
Initial Equal Parenting Agreement creating full time, all time
equality of both natural parents, subordinate to no third parties (a
Constitutional right ignored by most Family Courts); a series of
Parenting Timetables for each year and statement of intent, or
"Wishes"; the requirement that the tentative Parenting Timetable laid
out there will be reviewed and finalized annually and incorporated into
Annual Parenting Supplement. Parental authority and discretion
is always equal and unaffected by inequalities of Parenting Time
Top Layer: Autonomy of Both Equal Parents on all matters not
Parenting Timetable alternates all residual parenting questions
between the two otherwise equal parents who are subordinate to no third
parties. Full autonomy of each parent during their Parenting Time
as allotted in the agreed Parenting Timetable on all residual parenting
questions not previously constrained by Covenants in the initial Equal
Parenting Agreement, or the current Annual Parenting Supplement.
Full discretion on residual parenting with the Timetabled Parent, but
flexibility encouraged and provided by Ad Hoc Agreements.
Icing on the Cake.....
Forget about the Courts and your Ex, and go have fun with your kids!!!
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"
Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to conform
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal BREACH
the ideas that the State assigns
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from pre-war
Nazi Germany. Under the British system rights are
not State-given, but God Given.
Buying into the Court's position that what rights
remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same position
that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and Canadian Children
are at birth the property of the Courts.
"SEATTLE - A man shot and killed by officers after he brandished
an inert <child's plastic> grenade at
Seattle's new Federal Courthouse Monday was described as
angry about child support rulings, police said. ... Court records
wages had been garnished in a child support case. ... He
twice by two veteran Seattle Police Department officers. ..."
"Lohstroh, a 41-year-old emergency-room doctor, was shot in
the back Friday when he went to pick up his two sons at their mother's
home. Police say the 10-year-old boy climbed into the back of his
father's sport utility vehicle, fired a pistol several times through the
back of the driver's seat and then ran back inside the home."
Lawyers consistently estimate the homosexual fraction of
the Law Societies & Judiciaries as "forty-something" percent.
a randomly selected Judge or Lawyer is about thirty
TIMES more likely to be homosexual than the population at large
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.