"Natural
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
"Natural
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage
bill"
16.10 Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to
conform
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal
BREACH OF TRUST"
FYI,
the ideas that the State assigns
Rights &
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from
pre-war Nazi Germany. Under the British system
rights are not State-given, but God Given.
Buying into the Court's position that what
rights remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same
position that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and
Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.
In
"Women and the Process of Constitutional Reform"
McLellan warns that <Horrors!>
"Provincial
Legislatures may impose a presumption of Joint Custody...
and perpetuate the domination of men over women"
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and
they will likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these
days".
This is completely FALSE. The Judges
are Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT
CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
1649, only
PARLIAMENT has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was
only observed and documented by individuals sent out by the
newly Norman Crown after the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the
laws and customs of the various peoples of Britain..
This was done with a view to aggregate existing customs
which may vary across the land, into a unified body of
Laws. The Authority quoted by the Commoners in their
administration of
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
Bible and
principles of
Danelaw
The process of documentation took only a
couple of hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body
of Law which was historical, popular, and has served in the
intervening centuries as a Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
Instead their position to promote the
"rights" of a "Parent" in the widest sense of the
word, making NO distinction between
NATURAL PARENTS and
wannaabe
Legal Parents. They have bowed to
University of
Victoria's assertion that the SCC's
Trociuk
Decision
"endorses a Heterosexual View of the Family and must be
ignored", legitimizing the ongoing
Child
Trafficking by the State which views
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in
the lucrative Child
Adoption Market They refuse to be hampered by prior
obligations to that pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can
Veto an Adoption.
It appears that many
"Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United
Nations and Liberal
Irwin Cotler's assertion that the
Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent
has "NO RIGHTS",
making the State, not the Natural
Parents the Protector of the Child..
Without Cause or
Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!
"In spite of credible revelations dating back to April 2002
about Bill Graham, a sex addicted bi-sexual sodomizing a 15
year old male prostitute named
Lawrence Metherel,
Paul Martin allowed Graham to remain
Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister - and eventually named
him to the portfolio of Minister of Defense.
"On Sept. 28/2005 a vote was held in Parliament to raise the
age of consent from 14 (one of the lowest age of consents in
the world) to 16 (an age which many still consider too low).
"Bill Graham, Paul Martin, and Anne McLellan, on Sept. 28th,
voted against raising the age of consent to 16
"The Family Courts
are <generally> a bunch of second rate hangers-on
... build each other's businesses through
referrals...Family Law is a <parasitic> self-sustaining
Industry"
Habeas
Corpus : "literally, "you
may have the body". A Habeas
Corpus is a legal writ that protects an individual against arbitrary
imprisonment by requiring that any person arrested be brought before
a court for formal charge. If the charge is considered to be valid,
the person must submit to trial; if not, the person goes free. When
the law is suspended, then individuals can be imprisoned
indefinitely and without charge."
.....
Skeletons in the Closet, a film drawn from the dramatized lives
of families living with a protected
Pedophile and the mental
illness it may create when a loving, faithful, Victim keeps the
Secret. This is shockingly
common. The Secret is their Power -
BREAK IT!
(You would be well advised to stay away from the Public Servant.)
Hedy Fry's Status of Women, "SOW", KILL IT, KILL IT FAST!!!!
Hedy Fry's Status of Women, "SOW", KILL
IT, KILL IT FAST!!!!
The university community tells us that at
least one of the Status of Women
university profs is not just a run of the mill Communist...
she's a self professed MAOIST!!! The difference
we're told is that a MAOIST believes in
FYI, we're told by female friends that
we need to expand our vocabulary into the pro-family
"First Wave Feminists" of the
late
1800's who fought for women's
equality and the anti-family
"Second Wave Feminists" of the 1960s who were the
anti-marriage "Femi-Nazis" who are typically the Marxist
Lesbians who are now maintaining control of our government
offices at the Courts, the Schools, and the University's
faculties of Law and Women's Studies and Social Work..
These are the evil SOWs who have created the
doctrines of "justified" deceit, lying, and theft in the Family
Courts to make "Reparations" for "wrongs done to women" over all
centuries since civilization began, and leave women with
all the financial power, and men with none.
We say it is
Hedy Fry, and these
"Second Wave Feminists" /
Status of Women /
Women's Studies types that need to be eradicated from tax
funded positions and be forced to make Reparations to the
thousands of Fathers and their families whose lives who have
been destroyed by them since the sixties. We need also the
restoration of the Enticement
& Seduction provisions of Common Law which these SOWs had
struck by Statute.
The Canadian Government is funding Radical Feminist groups, to attack all
"Pro Fathers Web Sites" for Hate Crimes, as well as Men who speak out about
abused men and abused children around the world. These include web sites in the
United States, Canada, and over seas. The dubious claim is that these websites
promote hate crimes, with the help of Foreign Governments.
The report called "School Success by Gender, A Catalyst for the Masculinist
Discourse," by Pierrette Bouchard, Isabelle Boily, and Marie-Claude Proulx, says
that the research investigates the advocacy discourse focusing on boys and men
during the decade between 1990 and 2000, as reported in the Canadian and
international press. The report's title gives no hint about it's real content.
The report claims that their objective is to explain the dynamics of this
discourse, using the school drop-out theme, which is their field of research, in
order to identify other themes that authors link together: suicide, child
custody, violence perpetrated by women, etc. The report actually contains a "hit
list" of Canadian and international organizations and internet websites that do
not appear to support the federal government feminist orthodoxy.
The research is based on articles published in Canadian, French, American and
Australian daily newspapers and mass circulation Canadian magazines. The report
enumerates any group that questions feminism and/or promotes egalitarian reform
of Family Law.
The report goes on further to say that as a result of the new issues raised by
so-called 'masculinists', a number of general recommendations for protecting the
gains that women have made. They stress the urgency for women to "take
ownership" of the Internet and demand federal funding and legislative changes
that would bring anti-feminist views into the category of criminal hatecrime.
The Status of Women Canada (SOW), and Gender Feminist Groups, are seeking to
suppress all voices of dissent, while advancing their own political agenda at
taxpayer expense. At the Hadley inquest, Deborah Sinclair made a comment about
seeking mre federal funding to investigate media was covering men's issues. This
reprot may be it. Nothing much is new in the report, it's the expected radical
feminist view that men be considered "insignificant sperm donors" and a source
of court-ordered labour.
The report also demands that whenever possible, the release of gendered data be
accompanied by contextual analyses". Presumably, that is so that facts that
contradict a feminist agenda can be explained away.
and finally, they list people and groups targetted. Their hit list:
a.. BC Fathers Ken Wiebe, creator of the BC Fathers Web site.
b.. Michael Jebbett, Director, Victoria Men's Centre. Joseph Maillo John Hedlin,
retired social worker.
c.. Association, Parent's Coalition of B. C. Todd Eckert, President.
d.. Kamloops Parents of Broken Families, Mickey MacMillan, Founder of the Men's
Alternative Safe House in a private house on Seymour Street.
e.. MERGE (Movement for the Establishment of Real Gender Equality): Ferrell
Christensen, professor of philosophy, University of Alberta.
f.. Alberta Men's Resource Centre Chris Cavenaugh.
g.. Family of Men Support Society Earl Silverman.
h.. Men's Educational Support Association (MESA) Gus Sleiman Manitoba.
i.. Men's Equalization Inc.Ontario.
j.. National Alliance for the Advancement of Non-Custodial Parents (N.A.A.N.C.P.)
/Alliance Nationale des organisations pour l'entraide Des parents Non-Gardiens(A-ONG)Jason
Bouchard.
k.. Canadian Committee for Fairness in Family Law James Hodgins
l.. Canadian Men's Parenting Association
m.. Children for Justice Frank Verkey Dale Cherr
n.. Coalition of Canadian Men's Organizations J. Kirby Inwood
o.. Divorce and Defence Strategies Canada (DADS Canada) Stacy Robb, President
p.. Equal Parenting of Durham (EPD) Peter Meier Ron Dovey.
q.. Ex-Fathers Lloyd Gorling.
r.. Fathercraft Communication Glenn Cheriton
s.. Fathers Are Capable Too (F.A.C.T.)
t.. Fathers After Rights Equalization (F.A.R.E.) Brett Peters.
u.. Fatherz for Justice - Ontario.Rick Morrison, Paul Nelson Robert McKinnon,
Joe Lopez, and Steve Jackson.
v.. Fathers' Group - Owen Sound Graham Jordan
w.. Fathers Helping Fathers Tim Ready, Founding President.
x.. Fathers' Rights Brantford.
y.. Fathers' Support Group - Nepean Cathy Gardner.
z.. Fathers With Rights, Armand Massicotte.
aa.. In Search of Justice, Ross Virgin, President.
ab.. Kids Need Both Parents, Chuck Farrauto.
ac.. Mending Fences Support Services for Men Inc. Scott Elliott.
ad.. Men's Divorce Centre Terry Bissessar,
ae.. Men's Health Network, Glenn Cheriton, Ottawa Coordinator.
af.. Ontario Centre for Men Alan Roth.
ag.. Single Fathers of Niagara Alan Roth.
ah.. Single Fathers Network of Ottawa Robert Gagnon.
ai.. Windsor Men's Forum Bob Cartlidge.
aj.. Toronto Men's Clearinghouse Greg Barowski
ak.. Entraide Pères-Enfants Séparés (ENPES). Jacques Dupuis Claude Bouchard.
al.. Groupe d'entraide aux pères et de soutien à l'enfant (GEPSE) Yves Coutu,
President Jean Lanthier.
am.. Groupe d'action Des Pères pour le Maintien Des Liens Familiaux (GAPLMF)
Norman Levasseur, PresidentRéal Proulx, Vice-President Sylvain Gélinas,
Secretary.
an.. L'Après-rupture Gilbert Claes, CEO Jean-Claude Boucher, President Serge
Ferrand.
ao.. Association Masculine d'Entraide pour la Famille (AMEF) Jacques Pettigrew,
President
ap.. L'A.M.I. (Association masculine irénique) Roger Fatta, Founding President.
aq.. Organisation pour le Respect Des Liens Familiaux Jean-Dominique Riché,
Founding President.
ar.. Organisation pour la Sauvegarde Des Droits Des Enfants Ricardo Di Done,
President Germain Dulac, professor of sociology, McGill University Jeffrey
Asher, professor of social studies Glenne F. Cartwright, Department of
Educational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University.
as.. Men's Legal Defence Fund Mark Wickam.
at.. Réseau Men Québec Guy Corneau, Network founder.
This is just the Canadian list. It also appears that they are going on an
international attack as well.
This report appears to be another feminist attack upon A Joint Committee of
the Senate and House of Commons report. That Committee held hearings across
the country on the issue of custody and access Divorce Act reforms. The
Committee did not fully-accept the feminist arguments that men are dangerous and
abusive and that mothers should always have sole custody of children.
The Committee report,
"For the Sake of the Children"
released on December 9, 1998,
shocked many feminists with recommendations that there should be shared
parenting following the divorce so that a child will have involvement from both
parents. At present, the mother customarily is given custody with the
father, usually having access to his child or visitation rights -- such rights
being carried out depending upon the mother's inclination. Feminists wish to
retain this lopsided status quo that simply does not match modern family
realities. It does generate millions of additional dollars for lawyers though,
because the current Divorce Act places both divorcing parents under legal threat
of losing their children. Despite gender-neutral language, several factors
conspire to ensurre that it is most often the father who loses his children, and
that is what SOW wishes to defend.
The report also recommended a mandatory
90 day notice if one parent wishes to move away from the former spouse and that
support payments would be adjusted to facilitate continued visits.
Another recommendation was that there be
compulsory mediation for parents at the time of the divorce in order to develop
a suitable child sharing plan. This latter recommendation has worked very
well in some jurisdictions in the US and in the province of Alberta.
SOW is attempting to silence any egalitarians who support Shared Parenting
and Family Law reform. They use baseless accusations of "hate mongering" to
oppress freedom of speech. Radical feminist-socialist pet theories regarding
social engineering have been found wanting, and now just declare other
viewpoints off limits.
Dick Freeman
Freedom Fighter
Hedy Fry's Status of Women, "SOW", KILL
IT, KILL IT FAST!!!!
The university community tells us that at
least one of the Status of Women
university profs is not
just a run of the mill Communist...
she's a self professed MAOIST!!! The difference
we're told is that a MAOIST believes in
We say it is
Hedy Fry, and these
"Second Wave Feminists" /
Status of Women /
Women's Studies types that need to be eradicated from
tax
funded positions and be forced to make Reparations to the
thousands of Fathers and their families whose lives who have
been destroyed by them since the sixties. We need also the
restoration of the Enticement
& Seduction provisions of Common Law which these SOWs had
struck by Statute.
"Natural
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
"Natural
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"
16.10
Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to conform
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal BREACH
OF TRUST"
FYI,
the ideas that the State assigns
Rights & Responsibilities
to it's Citizen is straight from pre-war Nazi Germany.
Under the British system rights are not State-given, but God
Given.
Buying into the Court's position that what rights
remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same position
that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and Canadian Children
are at birth the property of the Courts.
Tax Exempt
Rockefeller Foundation
& Rockefeller Family backs Global Taxation and a Global Soviet
Government
"Some even believe we are
part of a secret Cabal
working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing
my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others
around the world to build a more integrated global political and
economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I STAND
GUILTY, and I AM PROUD OF IT",
Presently, the burden of proof is on the Accused to prove
themselves innocent (unless you are in a Criminal Court), Rare is the Judge who enforces Perjury laws against a
woman.
World Health Organization (WHO) gags unbiased DV studies, demands
falsified reporting on Violence Against Women
".... The Steering Committee of
the WHO Study agreed that interviews with men should not be included
..."
"In situations where very low levels of violence are documented or
there are results that are otherwise not expected, the findings should
be discussed with key informants and different community groups before
being widely disseminated."
In
"Women and the Process of Constitutional Reform"
McLellan warns that
<Horrors!>
"Provincial
Legislatures may impose a presumption of Joint
Custody... and perpetuate the domination of men over
women"
Hester Lessard, UVic Feminist Law Prof:
Heterosexual View of Parenthood must be ignored
"Trociuk is .. a
disheartening endorsement of biological concepts of parenthood
... flawed .... it legitimizes a heterosexual view of the family. ..
It must be ignored."
Send Robinson (right) cries while being supported by his partner Max
Riveron. Robinson claimed "stress" caused him to steal the
jewelry he intended to give his boyfriend. Robinson
continues to practice law in BC.
"In Ontario
alone, the names
Cornwall, Prescott,
and London became
synonymous with
"respectable" pedophile
rings -- lawyers, doctors, police officers
and
Catholic clergymen -- that for decades
preyed on society's most vulnerable
boys."
"It’s a funny thing about free speech:
It can’t be just for your political friends. If freedom means
anything, it is the one valuable gift you have to give to your
worst enemies, in order to keep it for yourself."
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.
