Remember, Remember the 5th of November,
The gunpowder treason and plot, I see no reason
why Gunpowder Treason should ever be forgot

Guy Fawkes thumbnail

    ● EP-BC Home About  Issues Testimonials News  Reference   Fun Stuff Members

Issues Area Home

Issues Summaries
Abortion Veto for Dads
Adoption Veto for Dads
Adopted Children Disallowed NPs
Affirmative Action
Age Of Consent
Anti-Depressants, Drug Induced Suicide
Battered Woman Syndrome
BC Vital Statistics Act Misandry
BC Legislature MUST
Big Brother, Micro-Management
Bill C-22
Birth Rate Displacement
"Best interests of the Child" = "Blank Cheque"
Breach of Trust
Carbon Tax funds Global Government
"Case Law" is NOT Law
CCA Wood and Playgrounds
Child Support Tables / SOW Fraud
"Child's Right" or "Parents' Right"
Child & Human Trafficking righs of CBA
Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges
Compulsory Drugging of Children
Corren Agreement
Court Ordered Sexism
Credit Crisis, Currency Replacment
Custody Orders not Enforced
Debtor's Prison Reinstituted
Day Care Universal
Deadbeat Dad Propaganda
Disabled parents
DISS = Divorce Initiated Suicide Synd.
Domestic Violence Propaganda
Division of Assets
Enticement Seduction Tort Claims Precluded
Estate Taxes Thieve a Child's Inheritance
EU = European Union:  Nazi Brainchild
Euthanasia, Spousal
Ex Parte Orders
False Accusations
Father Hatred Propaganda
Fatherlessness, State Imposed
Federal Reserve / Fiat Currency
FEMA Camps, Martial Law
Feminism = Socialism = Nazism
Fitness Test for Natural Parents in Divorce
Fitness Test for Students: "Transitions"
FMEP = Family Maintenance Enforcement
Forgiveness is NOT Compulsory
Franklin Scandal, Conspiracy of Silence
Freedom of Speech
Friendly Parent Rule, Max. Contact
Fundamental Justice
Glass-Steagall Act Repealed
Globalism is Treason
Habeas Corpus Abandoned
"Hate Crime" Speech  Police
HELP = Human Early Learning Partnerships
Homosexual Violence
Homosexual Activism, Gay Manifesto
Homosexual Marriage
"Human Rights” Commissions in Canada
Imputed Income:  Fraudulent CS Orders
Inheritance Theft: Grey & Black Widow
Judicial Accountability, Removal of Judges
Judicial Activism is Breach of Trust
Judicial Falsification of Court Transcripts
Judicial Freemasonry is Racketeering
Judicial Globalization is Treason
Judicial Interpretation
Judicial Racketeering, Law Societies' Rackets
Kinship Families / Grandparents
Lawyers in the Legislatures
Lawyers Lying in Court, Self Regulation Fail
Legal Abuse Syndrome
Letters to MP
Letters to MLA
Letters to Editor
Lisbon Treaty (2007) is Treason
Malicious Mother Syndrome
Malicious Prosecution
Misandry = Hatred of Males
Monetary Crisis:  "Money as Debt"
Move Aways
Natiional Sovreignity
Natural Parents Rights Eliminated, SSM
NAU = North American Union
NDP = "No Dads Party"
Net Neutrality:  Keep Internet Free!!
No Fault Divorce
NCR = Not Criminally Responsible
Oath Keepers
Parliament MUST
Parental Alienation
Parental Authority Usurped by Teachers..
Parental Kidnapping
Parenting Time Presumption
Passport & DL Removal
Paternity Denied, Birth Registration
Paternity Fraud, Birth Registration
Pedophiles Fear Dads New
Pedophiles in Public Service
Poofy Judges
Predatory Pregnancy
Protestant Revolution, BBC
PPP = Public Private Partnerships, Public Assets
QE = Quantitative Easing
Sexual Abuse by a Public Officer
Sex Change Surgery
Shadow Government
Sole Custody is Child Abuse
Special Prosecutors for Homo's & Judges
Star Chamber's Secret Overlords
SOW = Status of Women, KILL IT!!!!
Stockholm Syndrome Paradigm Shift
Straw Man Redemption, Free Man
Supremacy of Parliament
Target Legislation
Teachers displacing Parents
Teachers Seducing Students
Tracts and Flyers
Treasonous Public Officers not Prosecuted
Transcripts & Documents altered by Judges
UNCRC = UN Convention..Rights of the Child
Uptick Rule Repealed 2007
"Women's Shelters" = Lesbian Gulags

Notable Authorities

Albrecht, Katherine :  RFID Spychips
Alexander,  Rachel:  Shared Parenting
Angry Harry
Annett, Kevin: Child Trafficking in BC
Asher, Jeffrey
Baskerville, Stephen: "Taken .. Custody
Beatley, Terry:  UNCRC Vs Parental Rights
Baxter, Dorian: Canada Courtwatch
Beck, Glenn Beck: World Government
Bennett, Richard: Purpose Driven Church
Blick, Edward:  Global Warming & Marxism
Blumner,Court Ordered Sexism
Briffault, Robert: Briffault's Law
Burrows, Lynette: Homo Adoption
Caradori, Gary: Franklin Cover-up Investigator
Carley, Dr. Rebecca: Vaccinations
Carr, William Guy:  Pawns in the Game
Christie, Doug:  Freedom of Speech
Chopra, Dr. Shiv: Health Canada
Clarke, Christine:  BC Conservatives
Clifford Dean:   Freeman
Coulter, Ann: Free Speech
Cools, Senator Anne:  Lying Lawyers
Coffman, Dr. Michael:  Global Warming
Coleman, John:  Global Warming Fraud
Coleman, Dr. John (MI6) Comittee of 300
Coren, Michael:  Islamophobia, Homophobia
Crane, Ian:  Codex Alimentarius Scam
Cromwell, Oliver: Supremacy / Parliament
Cuddy, Dennis L. "Power Elite"
Cumbey, Constance :  New Age Nazism
Cummins, John:  BC Conservative Party
Decamp, John: Franklin Cover-up
Delaney, Chris : "No HST in BC!"
Dioguardi, Joe:  Saving US / Debtors' Prison
Dodd, Norman:  NWO Fabian Socialists
Doomsday Preppers
Duane, James:"Don't Talk to Police"
Dutton, Don:  RADAR, "Rethinking DV"
Estulin, Daniel:  Bilderberg Group
Evans, Stanton: "Blacklisted, Joe McCarthy"
Farage, Nigel:  UKIP, EU Titanic
Farrell, Warren:  Why Men Earn More
Federer, Bill: Endang'd Speeches, Quran
Fischer, Greg:  Family Preservation Festival
Fogal, Connie:  No NAU
Forseth, MP Paul:  FTSOTC Panelist
Fromm, Paul:  Free Speech, CAFE
Gage, Richard: Architects & Engineers 9/11
Gairdner William
Galloway, Roger:   FTSOTC Panelist
Geldof, Sir Bob:  The Love..
Gerrish, Brian:  EU's "Common Purpose"
Griffin, G. Edward:  Fed Reserve
Grignon, Paul:  "Money As Debt"
Gunderson, Ted:  FBI, Protected Pedophiles
Haeck, Lisa:  Sexual Abuse
Haines, Bruce, QC: Justice Review
Hein, Arnie:  "Cross My Heart" EP Trek 2005
Hiebert, MP Russ:  Human Rights Commission
Hill, MP Jay: EP Legislation
Hinton , Betty:  Status of Women's "Hit List"
Holland, Lary: "GET OFF THE BENCH"
Horowitz, David:  Islamofacism, Universites
Howse, Torm
Hunt, Dave:  Woman / Beast
Iserbyt, Charlotte: Dumbing Down
Jones, Alex
Kah, Gary: Obama, Vatican, Globalization
Kay, Barbara, National Post
Kennedy, John F:  Assassination 1963
Kernberg, Dr. Otto: Personality Disorder
Kerkman, Larry :  CRISPE
Keyes, Alan :
Khodeir, Lucien:  Child-Support Guidelines
Knight, Robert: Obama's "Radical Rulers"
Kruk, Edward: Child Custody
Lafantaisie, Michele:  CAS, CCA wood
Leslie, Sarah: "Pied Pipers of Purpose"
Levant, Ezra: HRT, Islam, Freedom of Speech
LInde, Carey: Statutory Ammendments
Lively, Scott:  "Pink Swastika"
Loftus, Elizabeth: Recovered Memories Myth
Luther, Martin: "Sola Scriptura"
Macdonald, Peter: "Taxcap" limits Debt
Machon, Annie:  Ex-MI5
Makow , Henry PhD: "Save the Males"
Man, Woman, & Myth
Matrisciana, Caryl:  Islam Rising, FITNA
Martin, Malachi: Globalization, Occult
McManus, John:  Stopping NAU
McKay, Dr. Marty
McLean, Candis
MacKenzie, Rob:  EP Trek 2006
Menard, Robert: "Bursting Bubbles"
McQuaid, Robert: Fix CAS
Millar, David
Mills, Dennis: MP Targetted by Homsexuals
Monckton, Lord Christopher
Monarchy, David Starkey
Monteith, Dr. Stanley:  Aides / Luciferians
Morris, Dick: G-20 Vs US Sovereignty
Murtari, John:  NCP Hunger Striker
Nash, Dave:  Cross Canada Run
Nazanin:  Persian Beauty for a Free Iran
Neufeld, Gordon: Hold - Kids
Nicholson, Robert:  BC's Protected Pedophiles
Nicolosi, Joseph:  Homosexuality
Norton, Bob:  Family Court Watcher
O'Connor, Matt: Original F4J-UK
PAFE = Planetary Alliance, Fathers in Exile
Palin, Sarah
Paul, Dr. Ron:  Sound Money
Peck, Dr. Scott: "People of the Lie"
Pedersen, Rob: EP Bike Trek US, 2007
Pellman, Adrian, LLB:  Judicial Activism
Perloff, James: Shadows of Power
Phenomenon: The Lost Archives
Pizzey, Erin: Women's Shelter Scam
Plywood Man, NWT
Protestant Revolution, BBC
Quigley, Carroll: Banking, Globalization
Rhodes, Carol: Child Support
Riplinger, Gail: Luciferian Bibles
Roberts, Carey
Roberts, Elise:  False Allegation of Abuse
Roscoe, Peter:  Judicial Bigotry
Russo, Aaron: NAU, CFR, Rockefellers
Ruppert, Michael C
Saburido, Jacqueline:  Don't Drink
Sacks. Glenn
Secret Files of the Inquisition
Schlafly, Phyllis:  Global Governance
Simons, Frank: Courts From Hell
Schafer, Nancy:  Child Trafficking at CPS
Schiff, Peter:  Currency Crisis, Debt Ceiling
Shafarevich, Igor:  The Socialist Phenomenon
Short, David:  St. John's Anglican
Shrimpton, Michael , QC:  Intelligence
Shrout, Winston: Common Law
Silverman, Earl:  Domestic Abuse against Men
SJCA - FTSOTC 48 Recom's
Simpson, Kari:  Road Kill Radio
Smith, Dr. Helen,  "Men on Strike"
Smith, Ron:  DC Rally, Drugging of Children
Soever, Alar:  SOW's Child Support Fraud
Sodhi, Eeva
Somerville, Margaret:“Same-Sex Marriage”
Still, Bill:  "Money Masters", "Mystery of Oz"
Stopps, Gordon  Vs Just Ladies, BCHRT
Stormer, John:  Betrayed ..  Bench
Story, Christopher:  "Perestroika Dec.
Sutton, Anhony:  Wall Street & Hitler
Taylor, Captain Tony: "Fatherless Day"
Trociuk Darrell, BC Birth Registration
Tyndale, William, "God's Outlaw", RIP 1536
V for Vendetta / Guy Fawkes the Hero
van Gogh, Theo:  Islamic Violence, RIP 2005
Vellacott, MP Maurice
Ventura, Jesse:  Conspiracy Theory
Vieira, Dr. Edwin:  Fiat Empire
Wagener, William
Wallace, Tom:  Sharia Law in UK & US
Warren, Elizabeth: Collapse Middle Class
Watson, Paul:  EU's Nazi  Origins
Wilberforce, William: Slave Trade Act, 1807
William III & Mary II:  "Bill of Rights" 1689
Wooldridge, Nancy:  Canadian Grans
World, Gordon:  Sexualizing BC Children
Youth Protecting Youth (YPY), UVic
Zepezauer, Frank:  Feminist Crusades

Your Articles

Let Ex Husbands Be Fathers
Perception vs Reality
Some Facts...
Both Parents Vital
Broken Homes, Bleak Future
Justice Review
Rights of fathers Ignored?

Petitions, Class Action

Support one of over 50 class-actions against unconstitutional 'sole custody' by Indiana Civl Rights Council

Support one of over 50 class-actions against unconstitutional 'sole custody' by Indiana Civl Rights Council

BC Statutory Amendments

Your Letters to an MP

Your Letters to an MP:  HOME

Letters to MP: I have $104.58 left over after paying child support

Post New Letters to a Member of BC Legislative Assembly (MLA) here

Your Letters to an MLA

Your Letters to MLA: HOME

Post New Letters to a Member of a Legislative Assembly (MLA) here

Your Letters to an Editor

Your Letters to an Editor: HOME

Post your New Letters to an Editor here 

Senator Anne Cools, FTSOTC Chair on False Accusations & Lying Lawyers

Senator Anne Cools, formerly Liberal, now Conservative, on False Accusations &
Law Societies' permitting Lawyers to Lie in Court

"'..  mothers and fathers should have equal rights in the raising of their children, regardless of marital break down"

Anne Cools - Google Search
Anne Cools - Google Video

Canadian Bill s-12, senator cools - Google Search

"Honorable senators know that I have studied a terrible and pernicious heart of darkness that has developed in our court system, being the use of FALSE ACCUSATIONS in civil justice.

"This is the mischief of litigating parties, usually mothers, suddenly within the context of divorce and within child custody proceedings falsely accusing the other party, usually fathers, of the sexual abuse of their own children.    ,,,    

"These FALSE ACCUSATIONS are often made with the overt or covert complicity of their lawyers. They are a lethal weapon in the business of parental alienation. They are a tool for achieving sole custody of children and creating fatherlessness."


Senator Anne Cools Runs Away With The Suns's 10 Top Women Poll, Kevin Connor, TO Sun

2004-06-08  Liberal senator < Anne Cools >  goes Conservative

1997-10-28 Child Custody and Access Reform, Special Joint Committee Established

Erin PizzeyMore:  Issues:  Cools, Senator Anne
Issues: False Accusations;
Isues Women's Shelters' Scam
News:  Liberal Hedy Fry / Status of Women (SOW):
News:  Cross, Pamela:Feminist Law:  Female Accusers must not be required to face those they accuse of Violence;
Issues:  Domestic Violence Scam & "Women's Studies" Propaganda
Issues:  Pizzey, Erin: Women's Shelter Scam;
Issues:  "Women's Shelter" Gulags:  Lesbian Brainwashing & Seduction Camps
Issues:  Cools, Senator Anne: Lying Lawyers;
News:  Liberal Hedy Fry / Status of Women (SOW):
Issuess:  False Accusations;
Issues:  Child Trafficking by Public Officers & Judges

Liberal Irwin Cotler:  "Natural Parents have NO RIGHTS"

Irwin Cotler, former Liberal "Justice" Minister robbed Canadians of their NATURAL PARENTS' Rights

Irwin Cotler - Google Search;
Irwin Cotler - Google Video

"Natural Parents have NO RIGHTS....  ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....

"Natural Parents' Rights now  gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"

16.10 Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to conform to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal BREACH OF TRUST"

FYI, the ideas that the State assigns Rights & Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from pre-war Nazi Germany.   Under the British system rights are not State-given, but God Given.

Buying into the Court's position that what rights remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same position that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.

More:  News:  Cotler, Irwin:  "Natural Parents have NO RIGHTS...;
News:  European Union;
Issues:  Paul Watson:  Nazi Origins of European Union;;;
Issues: G. Edward  Griffin ;
Issues: Fabian Socialism;

Liberal Anne McLellan says "Joint Custody Perpetuates the domination of men over women"

Former Liberal Justice Minister, Deputy Prime Minister

Anne McLellan , MP - Google Search

In "Women and the Process of Constitutional Reform" McLellan warns that <Horrors!> "Provincial Legislatures may impose a presumption of Joint Custody... and perpetuate the domination of men over women"  

The Liberal Party and Child Sexual Abuse

More:  News:  McLellan , Liberal Anne "Joint Custody Perpetuates the domination of men over women"

Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges and Legal Oligarchy

Chapter VII. The English Common Law. Section 57. The Norman Conquest

A beautiy of British  Common Law is that it is STATIC, and NOT DYNAMIC as these Activist Judges would have you think.

Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and they will likely tell you it is "Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say "Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these days"

This is completely FALSE.  The Judges are Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever.  Since 1649, only PARLIAMENT has the Capacity to make Law.

British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was only observed and documented by individuals sent out by the newly Norman Crown after the Norman Conquest of 1066  to observe and codify the laws and customs of the various peoples of Britain..  This was done with a view to aggregate existing customs which may vary across the land,  into a unified body of Laws.  The Authority quoted by the Commoners in their administration of Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the Bible and principles of Danelaw

The process of documentation took only a couple of hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body of Law which was historical, popular, and has served in the intervening centuries as a Benchmark against which Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".  It does NOT change.

More:   Issues:  Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges and Legal Oligarchy;
Issues:  "Judicial Interpretation" to pervert Statutes of Parliament;
Issues:  Judicial Activism is Breach of Trust;
Issues:  Judicial Globalization is Treason

McKenzie & Pedersen, the "Two Robs",
Equal Parenting Bike Trek US 2006, 2007...

Robb MacKenzie Equal Parenting Bike Trek - Google Search;
Robb MacKenzie Equal Parenting Bike Trek - Google Video

Rob Pederson, Equal Parenting - Google Search;
Robert Pederson, Equal Parenting - Google Video Equal Parenting Bike Trek's photostream

More:  Issues:  McKenzie & Pedersen, the "Two Robs", Equal Parenting Bike Trek US 2006, 2007...;
Issues:  Smith, Ron:  DC Family Preservation Rally, Compulsory Drugging of Children;
Issues:  Compulsory Drugging of Children, Thymerisol;

Beware of the "Parental Rights" IMPOSTER!!!!

"Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights"

Be on the lookout for the "Parent's Rights" IMPOSTER.  Insist on "Natural Parents Only", please!

It comes as a big surprise to us that many groups that present themselves as "Parents Rights" groups  REFUSE to defend the  NATURAL PARENT, and  and to demand RESTORATION of Natural Parents Rights taken from Canadians in the Homosexual Marriage legislation.

Instead their position to promote the "rights" of  a "Parent" in the widest sense of the word, making NO distinction  between NATURAL PARENTS and wannaabe Legal Parents.  They have bowed to University of Victoria's  assertion that  the SCC's Trociuk Decision "endorses a Heterosexual View of the Family and must be ignored", legitimizing the ongoing Child Trafficking by the State which views Canadian children as State Property and merchandise for  sale in the lucrative Child Adoption Market  They refuse to be hampered by prior obligations to that pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can Veto an Adoption.

It appears that many "Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United Nations and Liberal Irwin Cotler's assertion that the Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent has "NO RIGHTS", making the State, not the Natural Parents the Protector of the Child..

Without Cause or Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!

More:  About:  Beware of the IMPOSTER!!!!  "Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights";
News:  Lessard, Hester - Heterosexual view of Parenthood must be ignored
News:  Smith, Judge Daphne, BCSC, for Child Trafficking;
Issues:  Trociuk, Darrell;
Issues:  Child Trafficking, Canadian;
Testimonials:  Rick Fredrickson of Saskatoon

Bill Graham, Liberal <Pedophile> Leader & Defense Minister

Bill Graham, mp - Google Search;
Bill Graham, mp - Google Video

Lawrence Metherel - Google Search

2007-06-19  Liberal MP Bill Graham announces resignation

"In spite of credible revelations dating back to April 2002 about Bill Graham, a sex addicted bi-sexual sodomizing a 15 year old male prostitute named Lawrence Metherel, Paul Martin allowed Graham to remain Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister - and eventually named him to the portfolio of Minister of Defense.

"On Sept. 28/2005 a vote was held in Parliament to raise the age of consent from 14 (one of the lowest age of consents in the world) to 16 (an age which many still consider too low).

"Bill Graham, Paul Martin, and Anne McLellan, on Sept. 28th, voted against raising the age of consent to 16

More:  News:  Graham, Bill:  Pedophile Parliamentarian, Defense Minister

Phyllis Schlafly and Stephen Baskerville

On February 14, 2006 Both Phyllis Schlafly and Stephen Baskerville join together in a landmark interview
"War Against The Family".mp3


"The Family Courts are <generally> a bunch of second rate hangers-on   ...  build each other's businesses through referrals...Family Law is a <parasitic> self-sustaining Industry"


"Why isn't "Focus on the Family" working for Equal Parenting?

Stephen Baskerville's Home; American Coal. for Fathers and Children


Habeas Corpus :  "literally, "you may have the body". A Habeas Corpus is a legal writ that protects an individual against arbitrary imprisonment by requiring that any person arrested be brought before a court for formal charge. If the charge is considered to be valid, the person must submit to trial; if not, the person goes free. When the law is suspended, then individuals can be imprisoned indefinitely and without charge."      ..... 

More, Glossary of terms

Skeletons in the Closet, 2001

Skeletons in the Closet

Skeletons in the Closet, a film drawn from the dramatized lives of families living with a protected Pedophile and the mental illness it may create when a loving, faithful, Victim keeps the Secret.  This is shockingly common.  The Secret is their Power - BREAK IT!  (You would be well advised to stay away from the Public Servant.)

Trial By Jury displaced by Activist Judges

Of course Judges and other "Friends of the Court" won't receive capital punishment for Capital Crimes like Treason.

Trial By Jury, Canada - Google Search

Violence and Murder of Men by  Women sanctioned by Courts

FYI, most of what you  hear about Family Violence is a huge fraud because World Health Organization obligates members to:

a)  NOT report results of studies which do not show "expected results", and

b) if "unexpected results do eventually get reported, they may only be reported with "expert" commentary to explain away the deviation from the expected result that "Men are violent" and "Women are their Victims".

The World Health has as a primary Sponsor, the Rockefeller Foundations,  a Fabian Socialist group which has as it's aim the conversion of the West to a Soviet style block which can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.  See Norman Dodd.

What Is Gendercide?

Wages Gleaned at Source

BC ALS victim Art Brown finds FMEP garnishing his disability pension of Child Support for adult Child not living with Mother

Threats of Court  Costs &  Assessments lead Natural Fathers to abandon Custody Rights under Duress

Opponents of Equal Parenting like to tell you that seventy something percent of Custody Cases don't go to Trial, and are awarded as Sole Custody to Mom BY CONSENT. 

What they don't tell you is that in ninety something percent of Custody Cases that do go to Trial Mom gets Sole Custody anyway, and Dad has to pay on top of his Lawyer fees, the Court Costs for having lost his Application.  Faced with these abysmal odds, Dads are commonly told to "Just give her what she wants so you can have a good relationship with her".  Under such Duress many Dads foolishly acquiesce  ....  for a time at least......

We prefer that Natural Parents NOT sign a Consent Order that is not completely Equal with respect to Gender, as the relationship of the divorced couple is greatly destabilized with each injury to the equality of parental powers .

Pedophile Activists: Sexual Enticement of Children

Teacher-Student sex rules being relaxed by BCSC

Sexual Abuse by a Public Officer

Pedophile Activists obviously don't go around telling you what they're up to.  Instead they  call themselves "Mentors", "Social Workers", "Feminists" or "Homosexual Rights Activists".  In Canada, Pedophile Activists  have been successful in getting greater access to children by reducing the Age of Consent to FOURTEEN, and in eliminating a parents "right to know" when the child reaches the age of TWELVE, replacing them with school counselors and Social Workers, and by, of course, eradicating fathers from their children's lives entirely from birth on request by the mother. 

With the recent changes to accommodate homosexual marriage, the right of natural parents to "parent" their natural children will soon be removed entirely.  Through these statutory changes, the term "LEGAL PARENT" is replacing the historic term "NATURAL PARENT" in Canadian statutes.  As a result Natural Parents can no longer automatically claim to be the Legal Parents of their own natural children at birth.  Instead, to accommodate the Homosexual Activists' plan to push Natural Parents aside when it comes to parenting children, the Courts alone now decide who will be the "parents' of all children born in Canada.

Pedophile Activists are often lawyers, school counselors, teachers, Social Workers, Sex Ed teachers, YWCA leaders, pastors, Judges, etc. etc.  They seek positions with access and power over Children & Families, and positions to create social and political change.  The publicly undisclosed prevalence of Pedophile & Homosexual Activists in our civil service has been attributed to their determined politicism in the many groups like ACT UP! , the secrecy of the alliances made in various "secret societies" and sex clubs, and to Sexual Nepotism in the workplace.

Supremacy of Parliament (estab.1649) Vs Mclachlin's Activist Judges

Supremacy of Parliament and Canadian Statute ignored by Activist Judges

Guy Fawkes amd King James I. Source:

Fawkesian SCC Chief Justice Beverley Mclachlin claims SCC Victory in Supremacy of Parliament Debate

2005-01-08  Judicial activism debate on decline, claims SCC Chief Justice Beverley Mclachlin

2003-06-15  If judges want to make policy, they should disrobe and run for office

1999-05-19  More Canadian couples opting to stay married:  Anne McLellan, the Justice Minister, said last week it will be Guy Fawkes thumbnailthree years before she will allow changes to the Divorce Act to make shared custody the rule  rather than the exception.;

Guy Fawkes' Gunpowder Plot to Blow Up Parliament:  November 5th,  bonfires are set, effigies are set alight to commemorate the destruction of those <Judges & Lawyers> who would Destroy the Supremacy of Parliament

The Courts' outrageous claim to rule Canadians and our Parliament so far as we can tell is usually based on a claim to "Judicial Interpretation" which in real terms amounts to "Judicial Mysticism".  This is complete rubbish and at complete odds with British doctrine of Supremacy of Parliament..  It has to be acknowledged  however that a limited breach of Parliamentary Supremacy specific to Constitutional Amendments was created the evil Liberal PM Pierre Trudeau when he rammed through his beloved Constitution Act, 1982  selling it to Canadians largely on the basis of a new "Charter of Rights".  However NO NEW RIGHTS were ascribed to Canadians by it that hadn't already existed, and by it's creation, listing a finite list of Rights (which don't include Property Rights!) necessarily diminishes a Canadian's claim to the previously existing British Rights.  In the British system, to be incarcerated a Government Official must show that there is a Statute you have breached.  If there is no Statute barring you, you cannot be incarcerated by a British Officer.  Not so in the French system.  There, the burden of proof is upon YOU to show the French Official that YOU HAVE THE RIGHT to do <whatever> by pointing to the always limited Charter of Rights.  (In pre-Revolutionary France, French Officials made themselves and the State a lot of money by demanding the purchase of a PERMIT for activities we take for granted, and jailing INDEFINITELY   anyone who hadn't a PERMIT.   The French Charter  was the Revolutionaries' solution  to that, but it is clearly a more confining system than the British.)

So if anything Trudeau with his Charter actually ROBBED Canadians of their British Common Law Rights by moving all Canadians towards a French system.  Now twenty years later, Canadians are starting to realize they have gained nothing and have in fact lost a great deal in the passage of the deceptively named "Charter of Rights".

Back to the hole gnawed in formerly Supreme Parliament 's door in 1982 through which the Courts have re-asserted their claim to rule by "Divine Right".   In the years prior to 1982 Quebec's demand for a "Veto" over future Constitutional Amendments brought the "Patriation" process to a halt.  To get things rolling again, Trudeau and the Premiers threw in a "Veto" for all provinces in the form of the "Notwithstanding Clause".  Then they said that in future,  an unsuccessful proposal for Constitutional Amendment, could be taken to the Canadian Supreme Court.  So when the Amending Formula couldn't be met by the Legislators alone on a CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT and the Supreme Court may preside over the Legislators!!  This of course is "anathema" to anyone aware of Parliamentary Supremacy and personal freedom.  See also Fabian Socialism

To our knowledge no Constitutional Amendment has be brought to the SCC, by which the SCC might evoke whatever powers of Arbitration they were granted in 1982.   So it is our position that ALL Judicial Activism is Criminal Breach of Trust, and TREASON and must be Prosecuted as such.  We encourage everyone to know and understand the British North America Act, which we consider clear, rational and equitable.  Keep the Judges' commentaries out of sight, and you will quite comfortable with it's content.

More:  Judicial Activism & Tyranny

British Civil War's Achievements: 

1)  Crown's Irrevocable Settlement of Absolute Powers of Legislation to Parliament as Monarch's Trustees

2)  Crown remains as PROTECTOR of that Settlement of Trust.  (Cromwell refused to be made "King", but instead took the title "Lord Protector".)

3)  Crown retains Powers of Appointment with which to dissolve Parliament and call an Election upon Appeal by the Electorate.  Upon demonstration of a fair election, the Crown as PROTECTOR exercises her Powers of Appointment to assign to the new Government her settled Powers of Legislation.

4)  Crown's role as PROTECTOR of the settled Powers, and Assets (called "The  Common Wealth")  for the exclusive benefit of the Beneficiaries (British Subjects) is delegated in Canada by Appointment to the Canadian Governor General, and Provincial Lieutenant Governors to perform in her absence. 

More:  Issues:  Cromwell, Oliver: Parliamentary Supremacy;
Issues: Supremacy of Parliament;
News: Beverly McLachlin:  Canada's Treasonous Chief Judge
Issues:  Judicial Interpretation;
Issues: Judicial Globalization is Treason

Supremacy of Parliament: the British Parliamentary System

We Westerners are a pretty Democratic bunch, and don’t go for this “Leader - Dictator” propaganda.  I know it’s much easier for the Ottawa “Aristocrats” who want to rule by Divine Right to have us operate like they do in an Aristocratic Dictator / Follower relationships.  They use the word “Leader” for what is not “leadership” at all. 

Democratically minded “Leaders” do not rule.  Dictators rule.  Democratically minded “leaders” form consensus, and speak that consensus into Parliament, and Parliament “governs” with consensus in mind at all times.  This is a very rare thing in Canada for thirty years or more.  Canadian Governments and Judges do NOT rule by Divine Right.  Their Powers are granted to them IN TRUST.  If they BREACH that TRUST they need to be IMPEACHED.   

The English leveling of the Monarchy happened over a long period of time - certainly starting with the Magna Carta, - 1215, Things really started to unwind after Martin Luther’s Articles in 1517 and the Reformation, debunking the authority of the Priests. The “authority” of the Priests was no more by the Day of Pentecost, AD 30, at the latest.. Elizabeth I (c1558-d1603) was very much a consensus builder – from which came her real “strength”.  All this Reformation thought on which the British System is based culminated in Cromwell’s British Parliamentary system – 1649. In the British system, the “Supremacy of Parliament” has been in place over the Monarch, the Judiciary, and all until the present time.  Canadian Parliament is no different.

If by an Act of Parliament, Trudeau made a mess of our system in 1982, then by Act of Parliament, this can be Un-messed.  Failing this, the Provinces can de-Confederate and reform under the pre-Trudeau system, if they want to.  It is critical to understand that Ottawa gets its power from the Provinces (1867), not the other way around.  The Provinces were here first, and lent their powers to the central government.  These can be withdrawn, and should be on Breach of Trust by Ottawa.

I had to do some checking, but as far as I can tell, in France, overthrowing the Aristocrats – to the degree that they were overthrown - all happened very quickly and well after the British Parliament was already well established.   Guy Fawkes, of course tried to blow up Parliament and the King in 1606.  So far as I can tell, French social fabric seems to have never really made the shift to Democracy, and seems to have had one Dictator after another since Louie XIV’ terminated the absolute powers of Cardinals Richelieu & Mazarin in 1661.  He seems to have been well intentioned, but became more Autocratic in his own ways.  I think it was the debts this Louis racked up that made necessary the sale of the Louisiana Territory to the US in Jefferson’s time.  French feudalism was abolished by declaration in 1789. Robespierre, the Upper Class “leader” of the French Revolution had the impenitent Louis XVI beheaded in 1793 and began his “Reign of Terror” guillotining any opponent, including the moderate Danton in 1794..  Robespierre was himself taken by the mob to the Guillotine in 1794.   Robespierre’s friend, the ever so humble Napoleon Bonaparte shortly thereafter took the crown out of the hands of the triple-crowned Pope’s hands and placing it on his own head, crowned HIMSELF “Emperor” in 1804.  It remained there until Wellington removed it at Waterloo in 1815.  Bonaparte III and Petain were both “contemptuous of democratic devices”.  Petain, though heroic at Verdun in WWI, exaggerated the safety of the “Maginot Line”.  With the Nazis having rolled into Paris in spite of it, Petain was compelled to sign a humiliating armistice with Hitler in 1940, accepting German occupation in the north while Petain’s Vichy Government occupied the south for the Germans.  Hitler was backed politically and financially by the Vatican, which might have had something to do with Petain’s inability to fight the Nazis effectively.  We all probably remember his successor, Charles DeGaulle, who ran off to England to fight the war in France.  He is described as a would be Dictator by the Americans, and as “arrogant and obstructive” by the British.. 

Well!  After that exercise, so far as I can tell, the people of France historically don’t seem to have a head for Democracy, and haven’t the numbers of Democratically minded people to keep the Autocrats at bay.  What can we do if your guys want to follow a “Leader” like DeGaulle, or Trudeau?  We Westerners won’t do it.  The PMO has become more and more dictatorial ever since.  And now the Judges are calling themselves “Priests” of Canada, subordinating Parliament to do the Judiciary’s wishes.  THIS HAS TO STOP!

The Aristocratic and Democratic ways of doing things are irreconcilable. Maybe that a big problem with Canada for the last thirty years.   Aristotle and Democritus were arguing about this a long, long time ago, and the positions are still irreconcilable.  The Aristocrats, be they Liberal, Progressive Conservative, or NDP, are anti-Democratic. I want us to be different, and rather than conform to their Aristocratic ways of doing things, force Ottawa and the Legislatures to behave in a more Democratic fashion, knowing they have to with a lot of unpredictable fathers out there.

Guy Fawkes / Bonfire Night (1605)

Guy Fawkes amd King James I. Source:

The unfortunate conspirator Fawkes appears before his intended victim.

Shall we start our own Guy Fawkes Day here in Canada?  ….burn the Fawkesians in Effigy? It’s not like Mclachlin's SCC's  “blowing up Parliament” hasn’t been tried before. 

In Britain, the principal of the Supremacy of Parliament over any would-be-Dictator is commemorated in Guy Fawkes Day.  In Canada, which was built on the same system, hardly anyone seems to have even heard of “Supremacy of Parliament”, but that is what the English Civil War was all about.  It was the establishment of Parliament as Supreme and the reduction of the Monarch - who had claimed to rule by "Divine Right" - to a Constitutional Monarch which would have NO say in Public Policy.  The Monarch's responsibly was to scrutinize the legitimacy of a would be Government before lending it their traditional powers of governance.  The Monarch's political power was reduced to that of the Dissolution of Parliament and the calling of an Election if the Government ever failed in it's responsibilities to the Governed.  In this system, there is NO room for priggish little Courtiers expecting to make Public Policy. 

To make Policy, Beverly, YOU HAVE TO BE ELECTED!  If you won't abide by that, you are in Criminal Breach of Trust by a Public Officer.  

Canute making a point, ~1020 AD

Canute making a point

"Remember this!", Canute is telling his Court, "I am your King, and I cannot command the Tide.  We are only Men.  Neither you nor I have the power to proclaim things into existence.  Only God, who created the Tide,  can do that!"

More:  News:  Beverly McLachlin:  Canada's Treasonous Chief Judge;
Issues:  Cromwell, Oliver: Parliamentary Supremacy;
News:  Obama's Muslim Faith
Issues: Supremacy of Parliament;
Issues:  Judicial Interpretation;
Issues: Judicial Globalization is Treason;

Supremacy of Parliament (estab.1649) Vs Mclachlin's Activist Judges

Guy Fawkes amd King James I. Source:

Fawkesian SCC Chief Justice Beverley Mclachlin claims SCC Victory in Supremacy of Parliament Debate

More:  News:  Beverly McLachlin:  Canada's Treasonous Chief Judge;
Issues:  Cromwell, Oliver: Parliamentary Supremacy;
Issues: Supremacy of Parliament;
Issues:  Judicial Interpretation;
Issues: Judicial Globalization is Treason

Oliver Cromwell, Lord Protector of Parliamentary Supremacy, 1649

Oliver Cromwell - Google Search:
Oliver Cromwell, Richard Harris, 1970 - Google Videos

British Civil War's Achievements: 

1)  Crown's Irrevocable Settlement of Absolute Powers of Legislation to Parliament as Monarch's Trustees

2)  Crown remains as PROTECTOR of that Settlement of Trust.  (Cromwell refused to be made "King", but instead took the title "Lord Protector".)

3)  Crown retains Powers of Appointment with which to dissolve Parliament and call an Election upon Appeal by the Electorate.  Upon demonstration of a fair election, the Crown as PROTECTOR exercises her Powers of Appointment to assign to the new Government her settled Powers of Legislation.

4)  Crown's role as PROTECTOR of the settled Powers, and Assets (called "The  Common Wealth")  for the exclusive benefit of the Beneficiaries (British Subjects) is delegated in Canada by Appointment to the Canadian Governor General, and Provincial Lieutenant Governors to perform in her absence.

More:  Issues:  Cromwell, Oliver:  Lord Protector of Parliamentary Supremacy:
News: Beverly McLachlin:  Canada's Treasonous Chief Judge;:
Issues: Supremacy of Parliament;
Issues:  Judicial Interpretation;
Issues: Judicial Globalization is Treason

Guy Fawkes, Vatican Assassin

"Gunpowder Plot" to blow up Protestant King & Parliament, Nov 5 1605

Guy Fawkes "Gunpowder Plot" - Google Search;
Guy Fawkes "Gunpowder Plot" - Google Videos

Born an English Catholic, Fawkes left Britain to fight as a Mercenary for the Spanish.  He later returned secretly to England from France to Assassinate the newly Protestant King James I in what has been called the "Gunpowder Plot".  It is inconceivable that the Jesuits and Cardinal Richelieu were not fully knowledgeable and participant in the Operation..

More:  News:  Guy Fawkes the Villain: "Gunpowder Plot" Nov 5 1605
Issues:  Riplinger, Gail;
Issues:  Cromwell, Oliver;
Issues:  Supremacy of Parliament

Charles I of England:  RIP 1649

Beheaded for Treason ...  inviting Invasion & Foreign Rule of UK from Spain / Rome

One of the most tragic figures of British History, Charles' reliance on his Priests' advice settled his loyalty to Rome and against his people to whom he was sworn and to his father James I, who, having authorized translation of the Bible into the English language, narrowly escaped the Papist "Gunpowder Plot" of 1605.

While wrangling with Parliament for Supremacy, Charles secretly sought allies in France and Spain by which to invade Britain, conquering it for the usurper "King of Kings, and Lord of Lords", the "Vicar of Christ" in Rome.

More:  Testimonials:  Charles I of England:  RIP 1649;
Issues:  James I of England, Newly Protestant King Targeted for Assassination in "Gunpowder Plot" of 1605;
News:  Guy Fawkes the Villain: "Gunpowder Plot" Nov 5 1605
Issues:  Riplinger, Gail;
Issues:  Cromwell, Oliver;
Issues:  Supremacy of Parliament

"Case Law" is not Law, it is merely "Stare Decisis"

Activist Judges are in Criminal Breach of Trust

Stare Decisis Latin: "stay with what has been decided."

Case Law, Canada - Google Search:
Case Law, US - Google Search
Stare Decisis - Google Search

Judges and lawyers often refer to what is called "Case Law" which simply is the past decisions of judges made in other cases. In reality, there is no such thing as "Case Law"  because Judges don't have the necessary Jurisdiction to make Law. 

Only Parliament has that Jurisdiction..  The Courts are Agents of the Crown, and what Jurisdiction they have has been delegated to them BY STATUTE of Parliament.  Their role is the ADMINISTRATION of Law created by our elected Parliament, not it's creation.

Nevertheless, your lawyer, whose career depends upon his submission to the Judges, may tell you as we have been told repeatedly, that "It doesn't matter what the Statue says.....  all that matters is what the Judge says.   Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these days.   This is a Bluff of the Activist Judges, which you must Call. 

More:   Issues:  Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges and Legal Oligarchy;
Issues:  "Judicial Interpretation" to pervert Statutes of Parliament;
Issues:  Judicial Activism is Breach of Trust;
Issues:  Judicial Globalization is Treason

Beverly McLachlin:  Canada's Treasonous Chief Judge

More:  News:  Beverly McLachlin:  Canada's Treasonous Chief Judge;
Issues:  Cromwell, Oliver: Parliamentary Supremacy;
Issues: Supremacy of Parliament;
Issues:  Judicial Interpretation;
Issues: Judicial Globalization is Treason

Adrian Pellman J.G. , LL.B. "<Activist> Courts have.. turned the Law upside down contrary to the express intention of Parliament,"

Courts have .. turned the Law upside down, contrary to the express intention of Parliament.

Adrian J. G. Pellman - Google Search;
Adrian J. G. Pellman - Google Video

Tel: 01865 884400
Fax: 01865 884411

1 Abbey Street, Eynsham, Oxford OX29 4TB

More:  Issues:  Pellman, Adrian JG, LLB:  "<Activist> Courts have..turned the Law upside down contrary to the express intention of Parliament,"

"Cromwell", Richard Harris, 1970

Oliver Cromwell, Richard Harris, 1970 - Google Videos

More:  Issues:  Cromwell, Oliver: Parliamentary Supremacy;
News: Beverly McLachlin:  Canada's Treasonous Chief Judge;:
Issues: Supremacy of Parliament;
Issues:  Judicial Interpretation;
Issues: Judicial Globalization is Treason

Edward VIII: The Traitor King, Forced to Abdicate in 1936

More:  Edward VIII: The Traitor King, Forced to Abdicate in 1936;

Copyright 2002 


        Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages  exercising democratic rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.