Issues Area Home
1215: MAGNA CARTA, JUNE 15TH
Abortion Veto for Dads
Adoption Veto for Dads
Adopted Children Disallowed NPs
Age Of Consent
Anti-Depressants, Drug Induced Suicide
Battered Woman Syndrome
BC Vital Statistics Act Misandry
BC Legislature MUST
Big Brother, Micro-Management
Birth Rate Displacement
"Best interests of the Child" = "Blank Cheque"
Breach of Trust
Carbon Tax funds Global Government
"Case Law" is NOT Law
CCA Wood and Playgrounds
Child Support Tables / SOW Fraud
"Child's Right" or "Parents' Right"
Child & Human Trafficking righs of CBA
Common Law Perverted by Activist Judges
Compulsory Drugging of Children
Court Ordered Sexism
Credit Crisis, Currency Replacment
Custody Orders not Enforced
Debtor's Prison Reinstituted
Day Care Universal
Deadbeat Dad Propaganda
DISS = Divorce Initiated Suicide Synd.
Domestic Violence Propaganda
Division of Assets
Enticement Seduction Tort Claims Precluded
Estate Taxes Thieve a Child's Inheritance
EU = European Union: Nazi Brainchild
Ex Parte Orders
Father Hatred Propaganda
Fatherlessness, State Imposed
Federal Reserve / Fiat Currency
FEMA Camps, Martial Law
Feminism = Socialism = Nazism
Fitness Test for Natural Parents in Divorce
Fitness Test for Students: "Transitions"
FMEP = Family Maintenance Enforcement
Forgiveness is NOT Compulsory
Franklin Scandal, Conspiracy of Silence
Freedom of Speech
Friendly Parent Rule, Max. Contact
Glass-Steagall Act Repealed
Globalism is Treason
Habeas Corpus Abandoned
"Hate Crime" Speech Police
HELP = Human Early Learning Partnerships
Homosexual Activism, Gay Manifesto
"Human Rights” Commissions in Canada
Imputed Income: Fraudulent CS Orders
Inheritance Theft: Grey & Black Widow
Judicial Accountability, Removal of Judges
Judicial Activism is Breach of Trust
Judicial Falsification of Court Transcripts
Judicial Freemasonry is Racketeering
Judicial Globalization is Treason
Judicial Racketeering, Law Societies' Rackets
Kinship Families / Grandparents
Lawyers in the Legislatures
Lawyers Lying in Court, Self Regulation Fail
Legal Abuse Syndrome
Letters to MP
Letters to MLA
Letters to Editor
Lisbon Treaty (2007) is Treason
Malicious Mother Syndrome
Misandry = Hatred of Males
Monetary Crisis: "Money as Debt"
Natural Parents Rights Eliminated, SSM
NAU = North American Union
NDP = "No Dads Party"
Net Neutrality: Keep Internet Free!!
No Fault Divorce
NCR = Not Criminally Responsible
Parental Authority Usurped by Teachers..
Parenting Time Presumption
Passport & DL Removal
Paternity Denied, Birth Registration
Paternity Fraud, Birth Registration
Pedophiles Fear Dads New
Pedophiles in Public Service
Protestant Revolution, BBC
PPP = Public Private Partnerships, Public Assets
QE = Quantitative Easing
Sexual Abuse by a Public Officer
Sex Change Surgery
Sole Custody is Child Abuse
Special Prosecutors for Homo's & Judges
Star Chamber's Secret Overlords
SOW = Status of Women, KILL IT!!!!
Stockholm Syndrome Paradigm Shift
Straw Man Redemption, Free Man
Supremacy of Parliament
Teachers displacing Parents
Teachers Seducing Students
Tracts and Flyers
Treasonous Public Officers not Prosecuted
Transcripts & Documents altered by Judges
UNCRC = UN Convention..Rights of the Child
Uptick Rule Repealed 2007
"Women's Shelters" = Lesbian Gulags
Albrecht, Katherine : RFID Spychips
Annett, Kevin: Child Trafficking in BC
Baskerville, Stephen: "Taken .. Custody
Beatley, Terry: UNCRC Vs Parental Rights
Baxter, Dorian: Canada Courtwatch
Beck, Glenn Beck: World Government
Bennett, Richard: Purpose Driven Church
Blick, Edward: Global Warming & Marxism
Blumner,Court Ordered Sexism
Briffault, Robert: Briffault's Law
Burrows, Lynette: Homo Adoption
Caradori, Gary: Franklin Cover-up Investigator
Carley, Dr. Rebecca: Vaccinations
Carr, William Guy: Pawns in the Game
Christie, Doug: Freedom of Speech
Chopra, Dr. Shiv: Health Canada
Clarke, Christine: BC Conservatives
Coulter, Ann: Free Speech
Cools, Senator Anne: Lying Lawyers
Coffman, Dr. Michael: Global Warming
Coleman, John: Global Warming Fraud
Coleman, Dr. John (MI6) Comittee of 300
Coren, Michael: Islamophobia, Homophobia
Crane, Ian: Codex Alimentarius Scam
Cromwell, Oliver: Supremacy / Parliament
Cuddy, Dennis L. "Power Elite"
Cumbey, Constance : New Age Nazism
Cummins, John: BC Conservative Party
Decamp, John: Franklin Cover-up
Delaney, Chris : "No HST in BC!"
Dioguardi, Joe: Saving US / Debtors' Prison
Dodd, Norman: NWO Fabian Socialists
Duane, James:"Don't Talk to Police"
Dutton, Don: RADAR, "Rethinking DV"
Estulin, Daniel: Bilderberg Group
Evans, Stanton: "Blacklisted, Joe McCarthy"
Farage, Nigel: UKIP, EU Titanic
Farrell, Warren: Why Men Earn More
Federer, Bill: Endang'd Speeches, Quran
Fischer, Greg: Family Preservation Festival
Fogal, Connie: No NAU
Forseth, MP Paul: FTSOTC Panelist
Fromm, Paul: Free Speech, CAFE
FTSOTC 48 Recom's
Gage, Richard: Architects & Engineers 9/11
Galloway, Roger: FTSOTC Panelist
Geldof, Sir Bob: The Love..
Gerrish, Brian: EU's "Common Purpose"
Griffin, G. Edward: Fed Reserve
Grignon, Paul: "Money As Debt"
Gunderson, Ted: FBI, Protected Pedophiles
Haeck, Lisa: Sexual Abuse
Haines, Bruce, QC: Justice Review
Hein, Arnie: "Cross My Heart" EP Trek 2005
Hiebert, MP Russ: Human Rights Commission
Hill, MP Jay: EP Legislation
Hinton , Betty: Status of Women's "Hit List"
Holland, Lary: "GET OFF THE BENCH"
Horowitz, David: Islamofacism, Universites
Hunt, Dave: Woman / Beast
Iserbyt, Charlotte: Dumbing Down
Kah, Gary: Obama, Vatican, Globalization
Kay, Barbara, National Post
Kennedy, John F: Assassination 1963
Kernberg, Dr. Otto: Personality Disorder
Kerkman, Larry : CRISPE
Keyes, Alan :
Khodeir, Lucien: Child-Support Guidelines
Knight, Robert: Obama's "Radical Rulers"
Kruk, Edward: Child Custody
Lafantaisie, Michele: CAS, CCA wood
Leslie, Sarah: "Pied Pipers of Purpose"
Levant, Ezra: HRT, Islam, Freedom of Speech
LInde, Carey: Statutory Ammendments
Lively, Scott: "Pink Swastika"
Loftus, Elizabeth: Recovered Memories Myth
Luther, Martin: "Sola Scriptura"
Macdonald, Peter: "Taxcap" limits Debt
Machon, Annie: Ex-MI5
Makow , Henry PhD: "Save the Males"
Man, Woman, & Myth
Matrisciana, Caryl: Islam Rising, FITNA
Martin, Malachi: Globalization, Occult
McManus, John: Stopping NAU
McKay, Dr. Marty
MacKenzie, Rob: EP Trek 2006
Menard, Robert: "Bursting Bubbles"
McQuaid, Robert: Fix CAS
Mills, Dennis: MP Targetted by Homsexuals
Monckton, Lord Christopher
Monarchy, David Starkey
Monteith, Dr. Stanley: Aides / Luciferians
Morris, Dick: G-20 Vs US Sovereignty
Murtari, John: NCP Hunger Striker
Nash, Dave: Cross Canada Run
Nazanin: Persian Beauty for a Free Iran
Neufeld, Gordon: Hold - Kids
Nicholson, Robert: BC's Protected Pedophiles
Nicolosi, Joseph: Homosexuality
Norton, Bob: Family Court Watcher
O'Connor, Matt: Original F4J-UK
PAFE = Planetary Alliance, Fathers in Exile
Paul, Dr. Ron: Sound Money
Peck, Dr. Scott: "People of the Lie"
Pedersen, Rob: EP Bike Trek US, 2007
Pellman, Adrian, LLB: Judicial Activism
Perloff, James: Shadows of Power
Phenomenon: The Lost Archives
Pizzey, Erin: Women's Shelter Scam
Plywood Man, NWT
Protestant Revolution, BBC
Quigley, Carroll: Banking, Globalization
Rhodes, Carol: Child Support
Riplinger, Gail: Luciferian Bibles
Roberts, Elise: False Allegation of Abuse
Roscoe, Peter: Judicial Bigotry
Russo, Aaron: NAU, CFR, Rockefellers
Ruppert, Michael C
Saburido, Jacqueline: Don't Drink
Secret Files of the Inquisition
Schlafly, Phyllis: Global Governance
Simons, Frank: Courts From Hell
Schafer, Nancy: Child Trafficking at CPS
Schiff, Peter: Currency Crisis, Debt Ceiling
Shafarevich, Igor: The Socialist Phenomenon
Short, David: St. John's Anglican
Shrimpton, Michael , QC: Intelligence
Shrout, Winston: Common Law
Silverman, Earl: Domestic Abuse against Men
Simpson, Kari: Road Kill Radio
Smith, Ron: DC Rally, Drugging of Children
Soever, Alar: SOW's Child Support Fraud
Somerville, Margaret:“Same-Sex Marriage”
Still, Bill: "Money Masters", "Mystery of Oz"
Stopps, Gordon Vs Just Ladies, BCHRT
Stormer, John: Betrayed .. Bench
Story, Christopher: "Perestroika Dec.
Sutton, Anhony: Wall Street & Hitler
Taylor, Captain Tony: "Fatherless Day"
Trociuk Darrell, BC Birth Registration
Tyndale, William, "God's Outlaw", RIP 1536
V for Vendetta / Guy Fawkes the Hero
van Gogh, Theo: Islamic Violence, RIP 2005
Vellacott, MP Maurice
Ventura, Jesse: Conspiracy Theory
Vieira, Dr. Edwin: Fiat Empire
Wallace, Tom: Sharia Law in UK & US
Warren, Elizabeth: Collapse Middle Class
Watson, Paul: EU's Nazi Origins
Wilberforce, William: Slave Trade Act, 1807
William III & Mary II: "Bill of Rights" 1689
Wooldridge, Nancy: Canadian Grans
World, Gordon: Sexualizing BC Children
Youth Protecting Youth (YPY), UVic
Zepezauer, Frank: Feminist Crusades
Let Ex Husbands Be Fathers
Perception vs Reality
Both Parents Vital
Broken Homes, Bleak Future
Rights of fathers Ignored?
Support one of over 50 class-actions against
unconstitutional 'sole custody' by Indiana Civl Rights
BC Statutory Amendments
Senator Anne Cools, FTSOTC Chair on False
Accusations & Lying Lawyers
Senator Anne Cools, formerly
Liberal, now Conservative, on
False Accusations &
to Lie in Court
"'.. mothers and fathers should have equal rights in
the raising of their children, regardless of marital break
Anne Cools - Google Search
Anne Cools - Google Video
Canadian Bill s-12, senator cools - Google Search
senators know that I have studied a terrible and pernicious
heart of darkness
that has developed in our court system, being the use of
FALSE ACCUSATIONS in civil justice.
is the mischief of litigating parties, usually mothers,
suddenly within the context of divorce and within child
custody proceedings falsely accusing the other party,
usually fathers, of the sexual abuse of their own children.
FALSE ACCUSATIONS are often made with the overt
or covert complicity of their
lawyers. They are a
lethal weapon in the business of parental alienation. They
are a tool for achieving sole custody of children and
2004-06-08 SENATOR ANNE COOLS LEAVES LIBERAL FOLD TO
Senator Anne Cools Runs Away With The Suns's 10 Top Women
Poll, Kevin Connor, TO Sun
2004-06-08 Liberal senator < Anne Cools > goes
1997-10-28 Child Custody and Access Reform, Special Joint
Issues: False Accusations;
Isues Women's Shelters'
Liberal Hedy Fry / Status of Women (SOW):
Pamela:Feminist Law: Female Accusers must not be
required to face those they accuse of Violence;
Domestic Violence Scam & "Women's Studies" Propaganda
Issues: Pizzey, Erin:
Women's Shelter Scam;
"Women's Shelter" Gulags: Lesbian Brainwashing &
Cools, Senator Anne: Lying Lawyers;
Hedy Fry / Status of Women (SOW):
Trafficking by Public Officers & Judges
McKenzie & Pedersen, the "Two Robs",
Equal Parenting Bike Trek US 2006, 2007...
Robb MacKenzie Equal Parenting Bike Trek - Google Search;
Robb MacKenzie Equal Parenting Bike Trek - Google Video
Rob Pederson, Equal Parenting - Google Search;
Robert Pederson, Equal Parenting - Google Video
Equal Parenting Bike Trek's photostream
McKenzie & Pedersen, the "Two Robs", Equal Parenting Bike
Trek US 2006, 2007...;
Ron: DC Family Preservation Rally, Compulsory Drugging
Compulsory Drugging of Children, Thymerisol;
Beware of the "Parental Rights" IMPOSTER!!!!
"Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights"
Be on the lookout for the "Parent's
Rights" IMPOSTER. Insist on "Natural Parents Only",
It comes as a big surprise to us that
many groups that present themselves as
"Parents Rights" groups REFUSE to defend the
NATURAL PARENT, and
and to demand RESTORATION
Natural Parents Rights taken from Canadians in the
Instead their position to promote the
"rights" of a "Parent" in the widest sense of the
word, making NO distinction between
NATURAL PARENTS and
Legal Parents. They have bowed to
Victoria's assertion that the SCC's
"endorses a Heterosexual View of the Family and must be
ignored", legitimizing the ongoing
by the State which views
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in
the lucrative Child
Adoption Market They refuse to be hampered by prior
obligations to that pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can
Veto an Adoption.
It appears that many
"Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United
Nations and Liberal
Irwin Cotler's assertion that the
Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent
has "NO RIGHTS",
making the State, not the Natural
Parents the Protector of the Child..
Without Cause or
Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!
Beware of the IMPOSTER!!!! "Natural Parent's Rights"
Vs "Parent's Rights";
News: Lessard, Hester - Heterosexual view of
Parenthood must be ignored
Judge Daphne, BCSC, for Child Trafficking;
Testimonials: Rick Fredrickson of Saskatoon
Bill Graham, Liberal <Pedophile> Leader & Defense
Bill Graham, mp - Google Search;
Bill Graham, mp - Google Video
Lawrence Metherel - Google Search
2007-06-19 Liberal MP Bill Graham announces
"In spite of credible revelations dating back to April 2002
about Bill Graham, a sex addicted bi-sexual sodomizing a 15
year old male prostitute named
Paul Martin allowed Graham to remain
Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister - and eventually named
him to the portfolio of Minister of Defense.
"On Sept. 28/2005 a vote was held in Parliament to raise the
age of consent from 14 (one of the lowest age of consents in
the world) to 16 (an age which many still consider too low).
"Bill Graham, Paul Martin, and Anne McLellan, on Sept. 28th,
voted against raising the age of consent to 16
Bill: Pedophile Parliamentarian, Defense Minister
Corpus : "literally, "you
may have the body". A Habeas
Corpus is a legal writ that protects an individual against arbitrary
imprisonment by requiring that any person arrested be brought before
a court for formal charge. If the charge is considered to be valid,
the person must submit to trial; if not, the person goes free. When
the law is suspended, then individuals can be imprisoned
indefinitely and without charge."
Skeletons in the Closet, a film drawn from the dramatized lives
of families living with a protected
Pedophile and the mental
illness it may create when a loving, faithful, Victim keeps the
Secret. This is shockingly
common. The Secret is their Power -
(You would be well advised to stay away from the Public Servant.)
FYI, most of what you hear
about Family Violence is a huge fraud because
World Health Organization
obligates members to:
a) NOT report results of studies which do
not show "expected results", and
b) if "unexpected results do eventually get
reported, they may only be reported with "expert" commentary to
explain away the deviation from the expected result that "Men are
violent" and "Women are their Victims".
The World Health has as a primary Sponsor, the
Rockefeller Foundations, a
Fabian Socialist group
which has as it's aim the conversion of the West to a Soviet style
block which can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.
See Norman Dodd.
What Is Gendercide?
Opponents of Equal Parenting like to tell you
that seventy something percent of Custody Cases don't go to Trial,
and are awarded as Sole Custody to Mom BY CONSENT.
What they don't tell you is that in ninety
something percent of Custody Cases that do go to Trial Mom gets Sole
Custody anyway, and Dad has to pay on top of his Lawyer fees, the
Court Costs for having lost his Application. Faced with these
abysmal odds, Dads are commonly told to "Just give her what she
wants so you can have a good relationship with her". Under
Duress many Dads foolishly acquiesce .... for
a time at least......
We prefer that Natural Parents NOT sign a Consent
Order that is not completely Equal with respect to Gender, as the
relationship of the divorced couple is greatly destabilized with
each injury to the equality of parental powers .
Teacher-Student sex rules being relaxed by BCSC;
Abuse by a Public Officer
Pedophile Activists obviously don't go around
telling you what they're up to. Instead they call
themselves "Mentors", "Social
Workers", "Feminists" or "Homosexual Rights Activists". In
Canada, Pedophile Activists have been successful in getting
greater access to children by reducing the
of Consent to
and in eliminating a parents "right to know" when the child reaches
the age of
replacing them with school counselors and
Social Workers, and by, of course, eradicating fathers from
their children's lives entirely from birth on request by the mother.
the recent changes to accommodate homosexual marriage, the right of
natural parents to "parent" their natural children will soon be
removed entirely. Through these statutory changes, the term
"LEGAL PARENT" is replacing the
historic term "NATURAL PARENT"
in Canadian statutes. As a result
Parents can no longer automatically claim to be the Legal Parents of
their own natural children at birth. Instead, to accommodate
the Homosexual Activists' plan to push Natural Parents aside when it
comes to parenting children, the Courts alone now decide who will be
the "parents' of all children born in Canada.
Activists are often lawyers, school counselors, teachers,
Social Workers, Sex Ed teachers,
pastors, Judges, etc. etc. They seek positions with access and
power over Children & Families, and positions to create social and
political change. The publicly undisclosed prevalence of
Pedophile & Homosexual Activists in our civil service has been
attributed to their determined politicism in the many groups like
ACT UP! , the secrecy of the
alliances made in various "secret societies" and sex clubs, and to
Sexual Nepotism in the workplace.
Supremacy of Parliament (estab.1649) Vs Activist Judges
Supremacy of Parliament: the British Parliamentary System
We Westerners are a pretty Democratic bunch, and don’t go for
this “Leader - Dictator” propaganda. I know it’s much easier for the Ottawa
“Aristocrats” who want to rule by Divine Right to have us operate like they do
in an Aristocratic Dictator / Follower relationships. They use the word
“Leader” for what is not “leadership” at all.
Democratically minded “Leaders” do not rule. Dictators
rule. Democratically minded “leaders” form consensus, and speak that consensus
into Parliament, and Parliament “governs” with consensus in mind at all times.
This is a very rare thing in Canada for thirty years or more. Canadian
Governments and Judges do NOT rule by Divine Right. Their Powers are granted to
them IN TRUST. If they BREACH that TRUST they need to be IMPEACHED.
The English leveling of the Monarchy happened over a long
period of time - certainly starting with the Magna Carta, - 1215, Things really
started to unwind after Martin Luther’s Articles in 1517 and the Reformation,
debunking the authority of the Priests. The “authority” of the Priests was no
more by the Day of Pentecost, AD 30, at the latest.. Elizabeth I (c1558-d1603)
was very much a consensus builder – from which came her real “strength”. All
this Reformation thought on which the British System is based culminated in
Cromwell’s British Parliamentary system – 1649. In the British system, the
“Supremacy of Parliament” has been in place over the Monarch, the Judiciary, and
all until the present time. Canadian Parliament is no different.
If by an Act of Parliament, Trudeau made a mess of our system
in 1982, then by Act of Parliament, this can be Un-messed. Failing this, the
Provinces can de-Confederate and reform under the pre-Trudeau system, if they
want to. It is critical to understand that Ottawa gets its power from the
Provinces (1867), not the other way around. The Provinces were here first, and
lent their powers to the central government. These can be withdrawn, and should
be on Breach of Trust by Ottawa.
I had to do some checking, but as far as I can tell, in
France, overthrowing the Aristocrats – to the degree that they were overthrown -
all happened very quickly and well after the British Parliament was already well
established. Guy Fawkes, of course tried to blow up Parliament and the King in
1606. So far as I can tell, French social fabric seems to have never really
made the shift to Democracy, and seems to have had one Dictator after another
since Louie XIV’ terminated the absolute powers of Cardinals Richelieu & Mazarin
in 1661. He seems to have been well intentioned, but became more Autocratic in
his own ways. I think it was the debts this Louis racked up that made necessary
the sale of the Louisiana Territory to the US in Jefferson’s time. French
feudalism was abolished by declaration in 1789. Robespierre, the Upper Class
“leader” of the French Revolution had the impenitent Louis XVI beheaded in 1793
and began his “Reign of Terror” guillotining any opponent, including the
moderate Danton in 1794.. Robespierre was himself taken by the mob to the
Guillotine in 1794. Robespierre’s friend, the ever so humble Napoleon
Bonaparte shortly thereafter took the crown out of the hands of the
triple-crowned Pope’s hands and placing it on his own head, crowned HIMSELF
“Emperor” in 1804. It remained there until Wellington removed it at Waterloo in
1815. Bonaparte III and Petain were both “contemptuous of democratic devices”.
Petain, though heroic at Verdun in WWI, exaggerated the safety of the “Maginot
Line”. With the Nazis having rolled into Paris in spite of it, Petain was
compelled to sign a humiliating armistice with Hitler in 1940, accepting German
occupation in the north while Petain’s Vichy Government occupied the south for
the Germans. Hitler was backed politically and financially by the Vatican,
which might have had something to do with Petain’s inability to fight the Nazis
effectively. We all probably remember his successor, Charles DeGaulle, who ran
off to England to fight the war in France. He is described as a would be
Dictator by the Americans, and as “arrogant and obstructive” by the British..
Well! After that exercise, so far as I can tell, the people
of France historically don’t seem to have a head for Democracy, and haven’t the
numbers of Democratically minded people to keep the Autocrats at bay. What can
we do if your guys want to follow a “Leader” like DeGaulle, or
Trudeau? We Westerners won’t do it. The PMO has become more and more
dictatorial ever since. And now the Judges are calling themselves “Priests” of
Canada, subordinating Parliament to do the Judiciary’s wishes. THIS HAS TO
The Aristocratic and Democratic ways of doing things are
irreconcilable. Maybe that a big problem with Canada for the last thirty years.
Aristotle and Democritus were arguing about this a long, long time ago, and the
positions are still irreconcilable. The Aristocrats, be they Liberal,
Progressive Conservative, or NDP, are anti-Democratic. I want us to be
different, and rather than conform to their Aristocratic ways of doing things,
force Ottawa and the Legislatures to behave in a more Democratic fashion,
knowing they have to with a lot of unpredictable fathers out there.
Guy Fawkes / Bonfire Night (1605)
unfortunate conspirator Fawkes appears before his intended victim.
Shall we start our own
Guy Fawkes Day here in Canada? ….burn the Fawkesians in Effigy? It’s not like Mclachlin's
SCC's “blowing up Parliament” hasn’t been tried before.
Britain, the principal of the Supremacy of Parliament over
any would-be-Dictator is commemorated in
Guy Fawkes Day. In Canada,
which was built on the same system, hardly anyone seems to have even heard of “Supremacy of Parliament”, but
that is what the
English Civil War was all about.
It was the establishment of
Parliament as Supreme and the reduction of the Monarch - who had claimed to
"Divine Right" - to a Constitutional Monarch which would have NO say in
The Monarch's responsibly was to scrutinize the legitimacy of a would be
Government before lending it their traditional powers of governance.
The Monarch's political power was reduced to that of the Dissolution of
Parliament and the calling of an Election if the Government ever failed in
it's responsibilities to the Governed. In this system, there is NO
room for priggish little Courtiers expecting to make Public Policy.
To make Policy, Beverly, YOU HAVE TO BE ELECTED! If you won't abide
by that, you are in
Breach of Trust by a Public Officer.
Fawkesy SCC Chief Justice Beverley Mclachlin claims
SCC Victory in Supremacy of Parliament Debate
Judicial activism debate on decline, claims SCC Chief
Justice Beverley Mclachlin
2003-06-15 If judges want to make policy, they
should disrobe and run for office
1999-05-19 More Canadian couples opting to stay
married: Anne McLellan, the Justice Minister, said
last week it will be
years before she will allow changes to the Divorce Act
to make shared custody the rule rather than the
Guy Fawkes' Gunpowder Plot to Blow Up Parliament:
November 5th, bonfires are set, effigies are set
alight to commemorate the destruction of those <Judges &
Lawyers> who would Destroy the Supremacy of Parliament
Courts' outrageous claim to rule Canadians and our Parliament so far as we can
tell is usually based on a claim to "Judicial
Interpretation" which in real terms amounts to "Judicial
Mysticism". This is complete rubbish and at complete odds with British
Supremacy of Parliament.. It has to be acknowledged however that
a limited breach of Parliamentary Supremacy specific to Constitutional
Amendments was created the evil Liberal PM Pierre Trudeau when he rammed through
Constitution Act, 1982 selling it to Canadians largely on the basis of
a new "Charter of Rights". However NO NEW RIGHTS were ascribed to
Canadians by it that hadn't already existed, and by it's creation, listing a
list of Rights (which don't include Property Rights!) necessarily diminishes a
Canadian's claim to the previously existing British Rights. In the British
system, to be incarcerated a Government Official must show that there is a
Statute you have breached. If there is no Statute barring you, you cannot
be incarcerated by a British Officer. Not so in the French system.
There, the burden of proof is upon YOU to show the French Official that YOU HAVE
THE RIGHT to do <whatever> by pointing to the always limited Charter of Rights.
(In pre-Revolutionary France, French Officials made themselves and the State a
lot of money by demanding the purchase of a PERMIT for activities we take for
granted, and jailing INDEFINITELY anyone who hadn't a PERMIT.
The French Charter was the Revolutionaries' solution to that, but it
is clearly a more confining system than the British.)
if anything Trudeau with his Charter
actually ROBBED Canadians of their
British Common Law Rights by moving
all Canadians towards a French
system. Now twenty years
later, Canadians are starting to
realize they have gained nothing and
have in fact lost a great deal in
the passage of the deceptively named
"Charter of Rights".
Back to the hole gnawed in formerly
Supreme Parliament 's door in 1982 through which the Courts have re-asserted
their claim to rule by
"Divine Right". In the years prior to 1982 Quebec's demand for a
"Veto" over future Constitutional Amendments brought the "Patriation" process to
a halt. To get things rolling again, Trudeau and the Premiers threw in a
"Veto" for all provinces in the form of the "Notwithstanding
Clause". Then they said that in future, an unsuccessful proposal
for Constitutional Amendment, could be taken to the Canadian Supreme Court.
So when the
Amending Formula couldn't be met by the Legislators alone on a
AMENDMENT and the Supreme Court may preside over the Legislators!!
This of course is "anathema"
to anyone aware of
Parliamentary Supremacy and personal freedom. See also
our knowledge no Constitutional Amendment has be brought to the SCC,
by which the SCC might evoke whatever powers of Arbitration they
were granted in 1982. So it is our position that ALL
is Criminal Breach of Trust, and
and must be Prosecuted as such. We encourage everyone to know and
British North America Act, which we consider clear, rational and
equitable. Keep the Judges' commentaries out of sight, and you
will quite comfortable with it's content.
Judicial Activism & Tyranny
"Case Law" is not Law, it is merely "Stare Decisis"
Activist Judges are in Criminal Breach of Trust
Latin: "stay with what has been decided."
Case Law, Canada - Google Search:
Case Law, US - Google Search
Stare Decisis - Google Search
Judges and lawyers often refer to what is called
which simply is the past decisions of judges made in other cases. In reality,
there is no such thing as "Case Law" because
Judges don't have the necessary Jurisdiction to make Law.
Parliament has that
Jurisdiction.. The Courts are Agents of the Crown, and
what Jurisdiction they have has been delegated to them
BY STATUTE of Parliament.
Their role is the ADMINISTRATION
of Law created by our elected Parliament, not it's creation.
Nevertheless, your lawyer, whose career
depends upon his submission to the Judges, may tell you as we
have been told repeatedly, that
doesn't matter what the Statue says..... all that matters
is what the Judge says. Common Law is whatever the
Judges are commonly saying these days.
This is a Bluff of the Activist
Judges, which you must Call.
Issues: Common Law
Perverted by Activist Judges and Legal Oligarchy;
"Judicial Interpretation" to pervert Statutes of Parliament;
Issues: Judicial Activism
is Breach of Trust;
Judicial Globalization is Treason