Treasonous Public Servants not Prosecuted

Treason; 

"violation by subject of his allegiance to sovereign <the Crown / Electorate>: e.g. compassing or intending sovereign’s <the Crown / Electorate> death, levying war against him <the Crown / Electorate> or adhering to his enemies."

Eg.  Multilateral Agreement on Investment.

"In law, treason is the crime that covers some of the more serious acts of disloyalty to one's sovereign or nation. A person who commits treason is known as a traitor.   Oran's Dictionary of the Law (1983) defines treason as: "...[a]...citizen's actions to help a foreign government overthrow, make war against, or seriously injure the [parent nation]." 

In the British Commonwealth, the absolute Powers of the Constitutional Monarch  have been since the declaration of the Declaration of the Commonwealth, 1649 completely devolved to the Electorate by Settlement in Parliament.  The Monarch remains active, retaining the power to appoint and re-appoint successive governments as Trustees of both the Electorate and of the Crown.  After each Election, the fully devolved  Powers of Self-Government of the Electorate are aggregated with the formation of a Government.   which is then ceremonially lent the powers of the Crown  for a Term of Office.  Any action of a Government, a Public Servant or Individual which impinges upon the sovereignty and Self-Government of the Canadian People is clearly TREASON.

Since 1982, successive Liberal governments & Mulroney Progressive Conservative governments have often ducked the political liability of Treasonous policies by appointing Activist Judges  to implement Treasonous  policies.  Unless a Constitutional amendment is being disputed by the Provinces the Courts have no business interfering with the Legislative bodies in the creation of Public Policy and Legislation.   When they do interfere, Judges are PERSONALLY responsible for Criminal Breach of Trust and Treason.  To escape being PERSONALLY responsible the Judge or other Public Servant must show that they were acting as they were required by Parliamentary Statute.

2004-08-29  Why can't we judge the judges? New screening process for Supreme Court nominees is a sham