"Honourable senators know that I have studied a terrible and
pernicious heart of darkness that has developed in our court
system, being the use of FALSE ACCUSATIONS
in civil justice. This is the mischief of litigating parties,
usually mothers, suddenly within the context of divorce and
within child custody proceedings falsely accusing the other
party, usually fathers, of the sexual abuse of their own
children. ,,, These FALSE ALLEGATIONS
are often made with the overt or covert complicity of their
lawyers. They are a lethal weapon in the business of parental
alienation. They are a tool for achieving sole custody of
children and creating fatherlessness."
EPA
Meetings
are now managed using the Meetup meeting and messaging tools.
Leave a Note at: Equal
Parenting-BC if you wish, with your phone number or Skype ID
and we will try to call you to get you into a Group near you.
Spouses welcome at "Open Meetings", but NCPs only at
"Closed Meetings", please.
With
our buddies at the
Human Rights Tribunal and the Courts we have with NO
STATUTORY BASIS established that
HOMOSEXUAL RIGHTS trump
NATURAL PARENTS' RIGHTS.
By
exercising the Courts in Homosexualist Doctrine, the outcome of
any contest between a homosexual "Legal Parent" wannabe and the
"Natural Parent" has been predetermined, because
we have now established that "NATURAL PARENTS HAVE NO
RIGHTS".Our demands for
Homosexual Marriage is now purging from Canadian Statute the
term "Natural Parent", displacing it with the term "Legal
Parent".
Resistance
is Futile. We Judges, Lawyers,
Social Workers, and Teachers will decide who will be your
LEGAL PARENTS are. We have
our lackeys in the federal Liberals (Irwin Cotler) announcing
Buying into the Court's
position that what rights remain are Children's Rights, is
buying into
the same position that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and
Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.
With barely four years of legal practice under her belt (none of
it in the Courtroom apparently) it's hard to think of a better example
of how
damaging
Affirmative Action has
been to the Canadian Courts and Public Service than the case of
Beverly McLachlin.
Breach of trust by public officer
122.
Every official
who, in connection with the duties
of his office, commits fraud or a
breach of trust is guilty of an
indictable offence
and liable to
imprisonment for a term not
exceeding five years, whether or not
the fraud or breach of
trust would be an offence if it were
committed in relation to a private
person.
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.