McKenzie & Pedersen, the "Two Robs",
Equal Parenting Bike Trek US 2006, 2007...

Robb MacKenzie Equal Parenting Bike Trek - Google Search;
Robb MacKenzie Equal Parenting Bike Trek - Google Video

Rob Pederson, Equal Parenting - Google Search;
Robert Pederson, Equal Parenting - Google Video

Cycling4Children.com
Equal Parenting Bike Trek's photostream
More:
Issues:
McKenzie & Pedersen, the "Two Robs", Equal Parenting Bike Trek US 2006,
2007...;
Issues: Smith,
Ron: DC Family Preservation Rally, Compulsory Drugging of
Children;
Issues:
Compulsory Drugging of Children, Thymerisol; |
Beware of the "Parental Rights" IMPOSTER!!!!

"Natural Parent's Rights" Vs "Parent's Rights"
Be on
the lookout for the "Parent's Rights" IMPOSTER. Insist on "Natural
Parents Only", please!
It comes as a big surprise to us that many groups
that present themselves as
"Parents Rights" groups REFUSE to defend the
NATURAL PARENT, and and to demand
RESTORATION of
Natural Parents Rights taken from Canadians in the
Homosexual Marriage
legislation.

Instead their position to promote the "rights" of
a "Parent" in the widest sense of the word, making NO distinction
between NATURAL PARENTS and wannaabe
Legal Parents. They have bowed to
University of Victoria's
assertion that the SCC's
Trociuk Decision
"endorses a
Heterosexual View of the Family and must be ignored",
legitimizing the ongoing
Child
Trafficking by the State which views
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in the
lucrative Child Adoption
Market They refuse to be hampered by prior obligations to that
pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can
Veto an Adoption.


It appears that many
"Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United Nations and
Liberal Irwin Cotler's
assertion that the
Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent has
"NO RIGHTS", making the
State, not the Natural Parents the
Protector of the Child..
Without
Cause or Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!
More:
About: Beware of the IMPOSTER!!!! "Natural Parent's Rights"
Vs "Parent's Rights";
News:
Lessard, Hester - Heterosexual view of Parenthood must be ignored
News: Smith, Judge
Daphne, BCSC, for Child Trafficking;
Issues: Trociuk,
Darrell;
Issues:
Child Trafficking, Canadian;
Testimonials:
Rick Fredrickson of Saskatoon |








| |
Equal Parenting Trek - 2008
Annual
Roundups
/ Joint Speaker Meetings
of all Equal Parenting
groups:
Everett, WA to Washington DC in the US, and
St. John's to Vancouver in Canada
Equal Parenting Trek /
Progressive Convention Roundup Dates
|
|
|
In the US,
it's the summer...





Equal Parenting Cycle Trek & Progressive Convention for
Natural Parents Rights, US
|
In Canada,
it's the Fall....





Equal
Parenting Cycle Trek & Progressive Convention for Natural
Parents Rights, CA
Arnie sends his regrets. He is
indisposed this year due to Family Court proceedings.



W36: St. John's, NL Equal Parenting Roundup & EP Trek to
Sydney, NS |

W37: Sydney, NS Equal Parenting Roundup & EP Trek to Moncton,
NB |


W38: Moncton, NB Equal Parenting Roundup & EP Trek to
Montreal, QU |

W39: Montreal, QU Equal Parenting Roundup & EP Trek to Ottawa,
ON |
|


W40: Ottawa, ON Equal Parenting Roundup & Trek to Kingston and
Gananoque , ON |
|

W41: Kingston, ON Equal Parenting Roundup & Trek to Toronto -
Burlington, ON
 |
|



W42: Toronto, ON Equal Parenting Roundup & Trek to Oshawa &
Sudbury, ON |
|

W43: Sudbury, ON Equal Parenting Roundup & Trek to Nipigon &
Thunder Bay, ON |
|

W44: Thunder Bay, ON Equal Parenting Roundup & Trek to Kenora
& Winnipeg, MA |
|

W45: Winnipeg, MA Equal Parenting Roundup & Trek to Regina, SK |
|


W46: Regina, SK Equal Parenting Roundup & Trek to Moosejaw &
Calgary, AB |
|


W47: Calgary, AB Equal Parenting Roundup & Trek to Banff, AB |
|

W48: Banff, AB Equal Parenting Roundup & Trek to Vernon,
Kamloops, Abbotsford, BC |
|


W49: Abbotsford, BC & Equal Parenting Roundup & Trek to
Vancouver, BC
|
|


W50: Vancouver, BC & Equal Parenting Roundup & Trek to
Victoria, "Mile Zero"
|
|

W51: Victoria, "Mile Zero", Equal Parenting Roundup & EP
TrekTerminus


W51: Santa Marches alt al EP Trek Stations, HURRAH!!! MERRRRY
CHRISTMASSSS!
|
|
|
Michigan
dad fights for joint custody law,
2008-05-19\

2008-05-19 Michigan dad fights for joint custody law, Parents'
equal access to children called a civil rights issue
Parents' equal access to children called a
civil rights issue; critics say policy may hurt kids. Kim
Kozlowski / The Detroit News
Robert Pedersen was devastated three years ago when a
divorce judge said he could see his two children only a few days
a month.
Pedersen's
divorce agreement now includes long weekends, a Wednesday
overnight visit and half of summers, holidays and spring breaks
with his children. It's almost enough time to make him feel that
he can provide an equal amount of parenting to his kids.
Michigan law recommends that custody decisions be based on which
parent has been the primary caregiver unless it can be shown
that another arrangement is more appropriate, but Pedersen and
other noncustodial parents are fighting to modify the law so
joint physical custody becomes the norm. They view equal
parenting access as a civil rights issue, but opponents say
equal time isn't always best for children.
"With the pain of a divorce, a lot of stupid decisions are made
initially as far as the kids go," said Pedersen, who plans to
ride his bike from Lansing to Washington, D.C., this summer to
raise awareness of the issue. "There are different contributions
that Mom and Dad make to a child, and kids need both of them."
Noncustodial fathers think gender bias plays a role in these
decisions and reduces them to visitors who pay child support.
Children need both parents equally, they say.
But many custodial parents, family law attorneys and domestic
violence activists oppose making joint custody mandatory.
They say every family is different, and 50-50 custody doesn't
work in every situation.
It becomes especially difficult when parents live in different
school districts or one of them doesn't want joint custody.
Another factor is that mandating joint custody can sometimes
disrupt a child's stability.
"When a child's whole world is changing, we want to keep as much
stable in their lives as we can," said Karen Sendelbach, chair
of the Family Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan.
Other opponents say noncustodial parents sometimes want joint
custody simply to even the score with their ex-partner or to
reduce their child support obligation. A noncustodial parent's
support payments can drop by as much as 40 percent if the child
stays overnight 128 times or more each year.
"The 50-50 custody split is more about people not wanting to
feel the other parent has won," said Kent Weichmann, chair of
the Legislative Committee of the Family Law Section.
"It has nothing to do with the relationship with the child. It's
more about who's winning. It also has to do with paying less
child support."
More dads join movement
But supporters say this issue is not ever going to go away,
especially as more fathers join the movement, including movie
stars Alec Baldwin and Denzel Washington.
"It's a civil rights movement that is coming into its own," said
David L. Levy, CEO of the Children's Rights Council, based
outside Washington, D.C.
"It goes to the core of the right of a human being: the right to
be a parent to your child, and of the children to be part of
your life."
Next to child support, child custody is perhaps the most heated
issue between parents when they split up and try to restructure
their lives with their children.
Michigan hasn't kept reports on custody arrangements for several
years, but the latest information, in 2003, shows that the
Friend of the Court recommended physical custody of the children
for mothers in 68 percent of the 14,470 cases that year, while
fathers were recommended 12 percent of the time. Joint custody
was recommended in 2,717 cases -- about 18 percent.
While noncustodial mothers are also part of the joint custody
movement, it is spearheaded primarily by fathers and appears to
be gaining momentum nationally.
More than 25 states have laws regarding joint custody that are
much stronger than Michigan's, Levy said.
Since the 1990s, Michigan fathers have been trying to get the
laws changed to force the courts to immediately presume equal
joint custody.
A hearing was recently held on the fourth bill introduced in the
Michigan Legislature, but it was not voted out of the House
Judiciary Committee. It includes an exception for unfit parents.
In between the four pieces of legislation, the fathers launched
a failed petition drive to put the ballot before voters and also
were unsuccessful in a class action lawsuit in federal court.
Moms' groups eclipsed
Michigan dads say their effort is growing -- four new state
organizations support the issue, and their ranks have grown from
5,000 to 20,000 people, said Lake Orion resident Jim Semerad,
one of the leaders in Michigan's movement.
The growth appears to be eclipsing grass-roots groups headed by
custodial mothers. The Association for the Enforcement of Child
Support, a national group, was founded in Toledo in 1984 by
activist Geraldine Jensen. She had a base in Ann Arbor for two
years, before her 2004 retirement, which galvanized a number of
Metro Detroit activists.
The organization is now headquartered in Cleveland, has become
more virtual and is less visible in Michigan.
ACES executive director Debbie Klein is not concerned about
Michigan fathers' activism.
They have always had more time and money to lobby lawmakers,
while mothers tend to devote their time to raising the children,
she said.
Joint custody simply cannot work for everyone, Klein said,
because some couples are never going to be able to get along.
And it's the conflict between the parents in broken families
that is most devastating to children, not the actual divorce.
"It puts the children in a horrible situation," Klein said.
"That's what custody should always be about; it should always be
about what's best for the children."
'It's the right thing to do'
Many fathers say it's best for children to be with both parents
and that they will keep fighting until the law changes in
Michigan.
"It's the right thing to do," Semerad said.
It's also why Pedersen, 36, is training every morning for his
758-mile bike trek in August with five other fathers to spread
the word about what they think should be the law of the land.
"Kids do best with shared parenting, as long as it doesn't
disrupt the school schedule and the parents are fit and
willing," Pedersen said.
You can reach Kim Kozlowski at (313) 222-2024 or
kkozlowski@detnews.com |
|
|