"Natural
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
"Natural
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"
16.10 Maximum
Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to conform
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal BREACH OF TRUST"
FYI,
the ideas that the State assigns
Rights &
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from pre-war Nazi
Germany. Under the British system rights are not
State-given, but God Given.
Buying
into the Court's position that what rights remain are Children's Rights,
is buying into the same position that "<Natural> Parents have no
rights", and Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and they will
likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these days".
This is
completely FALSE. The Judges are Agents of the Crown
and they BY DEFINITION Judges
are WITHOUT CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
1649, only PARLIAMENT
has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was only observed
and documented by individuals sent out by the newly Norman Crown after
the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the laws and
customs of the various peoples of Britain.. This was done with a
view to aggregate existing customs which may vary across the land,
into a unified body of Laws. The Authority quoted by the Commoners
in their administration of
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
Bible and principles
of
Danelaw
The process of documentation took only a couple of
hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body of Law which was
historical, popular, and has served in the intervening centuries as a
Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
Instead their position to promote the "rights" of
a "Parent" in the widest sense of the word, making NO distinction
between NATURAL PARENTS and wannaabe
Legal Parents. They have bowed to
University of Victoria's
assertion that the SCC's
Trociuk Decision"endorses a
Heterosexual View of the Family and must be ignored",
legitimizing the ongoing
Child
Trafficking by the State which views
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in the
lucrative Child Adoption
Market They refuse to be hampered by prior obligations to that
pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can
Veto an Adoption.
It appears that many
"Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United Nations and
Liberal Irwin Cotler's assertion that
the
Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent has
"NO RIGHTS", making the State, not
the Natural Parents the Protector of
the Child..
Without
Cause or Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!
Svend Robinson (right) cries while being supported by his partner
Max Riveron. Robinson claimed "stress" caused him to steal
the jewelry he intended to give his boyfriend. Robinson continues
to practice law in BC following a deal cut with his
Special Prosecutor.
Svend's
Bill C250 added Homosexuals to the super class of groups in Canada's
retarded "Hate Law". who
can destroy in Criminal Court regular Canadians for exercising
Free Speech.
Even France has rejected Homo-marriage (preferring
France's homosexuals to emigrate to Canada?!). International societies
of Women Judges & Lawyers appear to have designated Canada as the
globe's Homosexual habitat of choice:
Meijers Latest news about globalizing Homo-Marriage & Homo-Parenting;
Coming up: 26-29 June 2005, Toronto, Canada, the conference of the
International Lesbian and Gay Law Association (ILGLaw),
Fabian Society, Communitarian
"Wolves in Sheep's' Clothing"
Globalizing National Socialism (Nazism) since 1884
In June 1989,
Gisele Marie Goudreault, 46 disobeyed a court order to hand her son
Orey over to his father, Rod Steinmann of Ponoka, who had been awarded
custody. She fled with the boy to Mexico and lived there for four months
before moving to California. ... Justice Peter Martin condemned
Goudreault's behaviour,
which prevented Orey and his father from being together during the
child's formative years. "They had the right to know and
love each other. "That possibility was totally and irrevocably
destroyed," Martin said. "What this woman did to this man and this
child is every parent's nightmare."2004-02-19
US teen 'discovers own kidnap', BBC
Darrel
should be able to sue Justice Southin PERSONALLY for DAMAGES, but will
that ever happen? All members of the Law Societies have sworn
their First Allegiance to their Society members.
Many
thanks to the
Western Standard for reporting Jeremy's Story. Jeremy is a
nominee for Equal Parenting's "Shadow-Parliament".
ACT UP!: Homosexual hijacking of Courts, Medical
Funding & Medical Research; Intentionally Spreading Aides to Heterosexuals & Hemophiliacs
to reduce Stigma
ACT UP! Homosexual hijacking of Courts, Medical Funding &
Intentionally Spreading Aides to Heterosexuals & Hemophiliacs
ACT UP! is the homosexual rights group that went across North
America in the late 80's(?) preaching to homosexuals how to get AIDS
research and treatment for fellow homosexuals by infecting
heterosexual women. They said that to get AIDS research homosexuals
were going to have to eliminate the stigma that AIDES was the
"homosexual disease" and the way to do so was to infect as many
heterosexual women and blood recipients as they could.
ACT UP! went on local radio station NW98 andinstructed Vancouver gays along these lines, "You are good looking guys, and will be no
problem for you to go to the straight bars and pick up heterosexual
women and infect them. You can also head off anytime, and give blood at the
blood banks, as they can't ask you any questions about your sexual
practices when you give blood."
In those days sexual background checks on blood
donors had been forbidden by Gay Rights in both the US and Canada,
and the HIV detection technology was limited to detecting the HIV
antibody only which took a year or two to develop after contracting
the AIDS virus. The virus could not be tested for directly,
and infected blood was being passed on to blood recipients,
hemophiliacs being at the greatest risk.
In the same interview ACT UP! also told Canadian homosexuals to push
for homosexual marriage so HIV infected American homosexuals could be
put on Canadian health care programs under the Spousal Benefits plan
for married couples. By getting
homosexual marriage into
Canada, ACT UP! said Canadian
homosexuals could force Canadian taxpayers to pay for AIDS
treatments of both Canadian and American homosexuals in their AIDS
treatment. (In the current Election, 2005, the Liberals have
announced a SIXTY MILLION award to Homosexuals in AIDS funding.) American
homosexuals were getting nowhere with the American system, and the
Canadians were a much easier target. The objective objective
of ACT UP! was to have Canadian homosexuals marry infected
American homosexuals who would then receive treatment from Canadian
taxpayers.
At the time of the broadcast, Californian ACT UP!
promoters were going back and forth between San Francisco,
Vancouver, Toronto, Montreal and New York with this message of
intentionally infecting heterosexual women to get rid of the "GAY
DISEASE" term for AIDS. We heard the ACT UP! promoters
preaching these ideas on on NW98 in the late 80's roughly, during
their Campaign.
2005-12-22 Top court redefines obscenity"In
a landmark ruling that shifts the legal ground under
Canadian sexual behaviour, the Supreme Court of Canada said
.. swingers clubs didn't break obscenity laws because the
group sex caused no harm ... to society as a whole."
The decision -- hailed as a "stamp of approval" by
swingers-club owners and deplored by conservative groups as
a licence for libertine behaviour -- essentially legalizes
group-sex clubs as long as participants are consenting
adults.
Comment:
What? No Public Health concerns? No concern
about the cost to the Health System: e.g. Liberals' 60
Million $ promises for AIDS patients? What are we
going to do with these
Activist Judges now dictating unsanctioned powers over
our family lives and communities? We need to
Separate the Judiciary from the Law
Societies to protect the good lawyers and make the Law
Societies independent of manipulative Judges.
"ACT UP! told Canadian homosexuals to push
for homosexual marriage so HIV infected American homosexuals could be
put on Canadian health care programs under the Spousal Benefits plan
for married couples."
"Trociuk is .. a
disheartening endorsement of biological concepts of parenthood
... flawed .... it legitimizes a heterosexual view of the family. ..
It must be ignored."
Lawyers consistently estimate the homosexual fraction of
the Law Societies & Judiciaries as "forty-something" percent.
That is,
a randomly selected Judge or Lawyer is about thirty
TIMES more likely to be homosexual than the population at large
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in the
lucrative 
