"Natural
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
"Natural
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"
16.10 Maximum
Contact & Friendly
Parent Rule has to go to conform to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be
held in criminal BREACH OF TRUST"
FYI,
the ideas that the State grants
Rights
Responsibilities Citizen is straight from pre-war Nazi Germany.
Under the British system rights are not State-given, but God Given.
Buying
into the Court's position that what rights remain are Children's Rights,
is buying into the same position that "<Natural> Parents have no
rights", and Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and they will
likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these days".
This is
completely FALSE. The Judges are Agents of the Crown
and they BY DEFINITION Judges
are WITHOUT CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
1649, only PARLIAMENT
has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was only observed
and documented by individuals sent out by the newly Norman Crown after
the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the laws and
customs of the various peoples of Britain.. This was done with a
view to aggregate existing customs which may vary across the land,
into a unified body of Laws. The Authority quoted by the Commoners
in their administration of
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
Bible and principles
of
Danelaw
The process of documentation took only a couple of
hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body of Law which was
historical, popular, and has served in the intervening centuries as a
Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
Instead their position to promote the "rights" of
a "Parent" in the widest sense of the word, making NO distinction
between NATURAL PARENTS and wannaabe
Legal Parents. They have bowed to
University of Victoria's
assertion that the SCC's
Trociuk Decision"endorses a
Heterosexual View of the Family and must be ignored",
legitimizing the ongoing
Child
Trafficking by the State which views
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in the
lucrative Child Adoption
Market They refuse to be hampered by prior obligations to that
pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can
Veto an Adoption.
It appears that many
"Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United Nations and
Liberal Irwin Cotler's assertion that
the
Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent has
"NO RIGHTS", making the State, not
the Natural Parents the Protector of
the Child..
Without
Cause or Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!
Svend Robinson (right) cries while being supported by his partner
Max Riveron. Robinson claimed "stress" caused him to steal
the jewelry he intended to give his boyfriend. Robinson continues
to practice law in BC following a deal cut with his
Special Prosecutor.
Svend's
Bill C250 added Homosexuals to the super class of groups in Canada's
retarded "Hate Law". who
can destroy in Criminal Court regular Canadians for exercising
Free Speech.
"THE leading family judge in England reinforced
the traditional view of marriage yesterday as he rejected an attempt by
two lesbians to have their Canadian wedding legalised in Britain.
.. Celia Kitzinger and Sue Wilkinson lost their High Court fight
to be recognised in law as a married couple. .. The British
couple used human rights laws to argue that the union should have full
legal status under English law. But Sir Mark Potter, President of the
Family Division of the High Court, also cited human rights legislation
in dismissing their application. .. He ruled that “to accord
a same-sex relationship the title and status of marriage would be to fly
in the face of the European Convention on Human Rights as well as fail
to recognise physical reality”. .. The
university professors,
who married while working in Vancouver in 2003, said that they were
“deeply disappointed by the judgment” and claimed that it perpetuated
discrimination." NOTE: Another example of Lesbians their
exercising the Courts to gain favorable precedents with NO STATUTORY
BASIS. Note also exchange of lawyers between the countries.
The UK Courts shouldn't allow Canadian Law or a Canadian Lawyer
presenting Canadian arguments in a UK Court. They should
immediately consider the possibility of trying for Treason anyone
pushing Canadian Law into UK Courts.
In June 1989,
Gisele Marie Goudreault, 46 disobeyed a court order to hand her son
Orey over to his father, Rod Steinmann of Ponoka, who had been awarded
custody. She fled with the boy to Mexico and lived there for four months
before moving to California. ... Justice Peter Martin condemned
Goudreault's behaviour,
which prevented Orey and his father from being together during the
child's formative years. "They had the right to know and
love each other. "That possibility was totally and irrevocably
destroyed," Martin said. "What this woman did to this man and this
child is every parent's nightmare."2004-02-19
US teen 'discovers own kidnap', BBC
Childhood
Sexual abuse is a recurring theme. We take extreme issue with
Religious Training which obligates
sexual abuse victims to "Forgive" their Perps before the Truth is told
and the Perp repents. Quashing a victims' report often results in
Displaced Aggression, perhaps murder.
Absent
father is the most highly correlated background factor found in
homosexuals, both male and female. Absent Father is a
developmental, NON-genetic factor. If homosexuality were genetic
there should be NO correlation with developmental factors, and
these factors should show Statistical Independence. They don't.
Also highly correlated to homosexual males is the "Lastborn Male" (of
several
children)
factor, a clearly NON-genetic factor, and suggestive of fatherly
neglect. Female Serial Killers may be of the Lesbian variety, or
the "Black
Widow" type. For some reason, many women applaud the "Grey
Widow" type, which we believe would not be possible without the
gross negligence and Femi-Narcissism of Courts in Division of Assets and
it's concurrent violence to Inheritance provisions for children of a
previous marriage.
1.
Money (74%)
2. Control (13%)
3. Enjoyment (11%)
4. Sex (10%)
5. Drugs, Cult involvement, cover up, or feelings of inadequacy
(24%)
From
Female Serial Killers
Darrel
should be able to sue Justice Southin PERSONALLY for DAMAGES, but will
that ever happen? All members of the Law Societies have sworn
their First Allegiance to their Society members.
"The CCP is the darling of powerful
liberal-left special interest groups who are used to getting their way
if they make enough noise -- notably feminists, gay-rights activists and
aboriginals. .. The CCP may be funded by Canadian taxpayers,
but it has been taken over by the very special interest groups that are
its major beneficiaries. Aided by their ideological supporters in the
academic and legal communities, these "rights-seeking" advocacy
organizations use the program to fund court cases whose goal is a
radical interpretation of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. ..
Most of the time, when such cases get to court, these left-leaning
government-funded organizations are opposed by traditionalist or
right-of-centre groups who receive no tax dollars to cover their legal
expenses.
"Please all watch May 15, & May
16, 2006 then give CBC feedback
liaison@cbc.ca or
cbcinput@cbc.ca. ... This
documentary is regarding CAS and it's power. As this story unfolds
exposing the Durham Children's Aid Society and the nightmare that
has rocked a kinship family it will carefully relate the gut
wrenching detailed story of the "Abuse of CAS's power" and a system
that is not held accountable by anyone. This show will reveal
the over drugging, and sexual abuse of a young boy, J while in the
"care" of the Durham CAS. ... As well
CBC will show how CAS covered up of the abuse, and the grandparents
$60,000.oo fight to get J out of the hands of the CAS. Plus many
more heartbreaking events concerning the Durham Children's Aid
Society located in Oshawa, Ontario. The dates are as follows for the
airing:
Monday May 15, 2006 and
Tuesday May 16, 2006 at 6:00 PM. LOCAL CBC Television as well as
Radio with 3 1/2 to five minute segments.
Tuesday May 16, 2006 at
10:00 PM with Peter Mansbridge on the National News about a 22
minutes time frame.
There are no words to describe
the suffering and the trauma that these children and grandparents
have endured." Thanks, Betty
"I receive death threats and abuse on a regular
basis. My address and phone number have been placed on the Internet by
gay militants and people told to harass and assault me. Jokes were made
when my father died, insults made about my family. ..I have been told by
editors and publishers that I will never work as a writer in various
places because I defend marriage. But I will not react in kind and I
will not surrender. I do, however, want people to know that there is
hatred at work."
www.EqualCustodyAct.com;
Dr. Mark Klein:
"Equal
Custody Act is a federal act Dr. Klein would propose which would give
equal rights to moms AND dads in custody cases. Currently men's civil
rights for the most part are being ignored in family courts. Dr. Klein
is currently in the "testing the waters" phase of a bid for the
presidency of the United States of America. Dr. Klein's key plank on his
platform is the Equal Custody Act. The Equal Custody Act will restore
civil rights to dads as the Civil Rights Act restored equal rights for
African Americans in the 1960's."
"Unfortunately,
disparate, decontextualized and
sometimes illegitimate findings can be easily cited and are often
employed to back up fallacious claims. Even cases of "scientific
studies"…demonstrate serious inconsistencies and indicate the enigmatic
nature of empirical research which is so often treated as "objective""
Dear
Members,
We have great news. There is a joint physical care bill that has
taken us completely by surprise. SF507 just passed out of the Senate
Judiciary committee and is now on its way to the Senate Floor. Below
is a copy of the bill that is exactly what we have been working for.
Since HF22 was passed into law (2004) we have been watching the
court rulings. What we have found is that most judges approved of
the law but a small few ignored it. One of them was Judge Pelton and
as you know we took action against him. The second thing we found is
that most judges do not find existing cases to qualify for joint
physical care. They claim that the bill is not considered a change
of circumstance; well the legislators appear to disagree with the
courts. SF507 will give every parent the right to request JPC, in
addition make it very difficult for the courts to deny it. This is a
very important bill and it needs your help for it to have a chance
to become law this year......
Senate
File 507
"Section 1. Section 598.41,
subsection 5, paragraph a, Code 2007, is amended to read as follows:
a. If joint legal
custody is awarded to both parents, the court may award joint
physical care to both joint custodial parents upon the request of
either parent during the proceedings on the initial dissolution
petition or during the proceedings on a modification of the original
custody border. A
rebuttable presumption exists that a request for
joint physical care by either parent is in the best interest of the
child, the burden of proof to rebut the presumption rests on the
party denying that joint physical care is in the best interest of
the child, and such party shall demonstrate that joint physical care
is not in the best interest of the child by clear and convincing
evidence. If the
court finds by clear and convincing evidence that joint physical
care is not in the best interest of the child and denies the request
for joint physical care, the determination shall be accompanied by
specific findings of fact and conclusions of law that the awarding
of joint physical care is not in the best interest of the child. In
determining the best interest of the child relative to the denial of
a request for joint physical care, the court shall consider that the
best interest of the child includes the opportunity for maximum
continuous physical and emotional contact possible with both
parents, unless direct physical or significant emotional harm to the
child may result from this contact.
Existing Legislation: Iowa Code 2003: Section 598.41;
"1. a. The court, insofar as is reasonable
and in the best interest of the child, shall order the custody
award, including liberal visitation rights where appropriate, which
will assure the child the opportunity for the maximum continuing
physical and emotional contact with both parents after the parents
have separated or dissolved the marriage, and which will encourage
parents to share the rights and responsibilities of raising the
child unless direct physical harm or significant emotional harm to
the child, other children, or a parent is likely to result from such
contact with one parent. ... "
Iowa's Bill HF22, Presumption of Joint Physical
Custody
"If joint legal custody is awarded
to both parents, the court may award joint physical care....
If the court denies the request for joint physical care, the
determination shall be accompanied by specific findings of fact and
conclusions of law that the awarding of joint physical care is not
in the best interest of the child. b. If
joint physical care is not awarded under paragraph "a", and only one
joint custodial parent is awarded physical care, the parent
responsible for providing physical care shall support the other
parent's relationship with the child. Physical care awarded to one
parent does not affect the other parent's rights and
responsibilities as a joint legal custodian of the child.
Rights and responsibilities as joint legal custodian of the child
include, but are not limited to, equal participation in decisions
affecting the child's legal status, medical care, education,
extracurricular activities, and religious instruction."
What may surprise you is that
Saint Patrick was neither Irish, nor Catholic. He
was instead born to Christian parents in Britain during it's
Roman Occupation.
Having been captured and enslaved
by the head-hunting
Irish Celts as a youth,
Patrick was compelled in adulthood to return to
Ireland to confront the Druids
and preach the Good News of
God's free gift of Reconciliation with God for those who will humble
themselves, and REPENT and
BELIEVE in the sufficiency
of Christ's substitutionary death alone to be
"redeemed" from sin. Patrick went to Ireland ~
405 AD with NO
consultation with
Rome, two generations before there was
even a Pope in Rome. The first Pope would not exist
until 457 AD, and in our view completes the corruption of
the Roman Church
Constantine hoped to avoid by abandoning the
"filth" of Rome and
building a NEW capital in
Constantinople .
Fortunately, the
Romans found Briton, too much
bother to occupy, and left the "ends of the earth" in
407
AD. Patrick would later be called a "Heretic"
by the globalist Roman Church, and
Augustine of Canterbury
would be sent by Rome in
598 AD
to eradicate the "corrupt:" (ie independent)
Celtic Church in the British Isles. For powerful
physical evidence of the Romanization of the Irish Celtic Church
see the roman arch at the Romanized stone church at
Boa Island. The Romanizers took the Celtic church
building apart stone by stone, and rebuilt the building into
the Roman form on the same site, hiding the obviously Celtic
carvings within the walls of the reconstructed building..
Rome hoped to eradicate the memory of the Irish Church, but
in time, these Irish statues re-emerged as the Roman
building fell apart.
It is interesting to note that the term
"Diocese"
was the smallest area of Roman Taxation. To each
"Diocese" a
Roman Tax Collector (also called
"Bishop"
, "Overseer", or
Nicolaitan) would be appointed.
Establishment of the Diocese and exacting the Tithe for Rome
fell to
Augustine of Canterbury.
The
Romanization of Ireland has never been expelled, resulting
in Ireland providing harbor for the
Spanish Armada on the west coast during Queen Elizabeth
I's time, and harbor for the
Nazi Subs in
Dublin Harbor during WWII. Tithes to Rome would
ultimately be used to fund Hitler, his pursuit of
Occult powers,
and the extermination of the Jews.
The Concordat effectively legitimized Hitler
and the Nazi government to the eyes of Catholicism,
Christianity, and the world. The
full text of the concordat appears on the
Concordat Watch website.
European army and political union were planned by Nazis
THE idea of a pan-European economic and
political union with its own defence force was conceived by SS
officers according to documents released today to the Public
Record Office in Kew.
Maj Gen Ellersiek and
Brig Mueller, Hitler's chief of staff during the
Battle of the Bulge, came up with the idea as a means of
keeping Nazism alive following the expected Allied victory in
the Second World War.
By March 1946, Ellersiek was in charge of an
underground political party called
Organisation Suddeutschland. It believed in the
establishment of a fully-armed United Europe, Ellersiek told a
British intelligence official masquerading as a Foreign Office
representative.
"What was important was that Britain should realise that if
Europe was to survive, we should all think 'as Europeans'," the
ex-SS man was quoted as saying. The party's manifesto called for
"a pan-Europe as a balance between Russia and the USA". Although
the European nations would remain "independent", finance and
defence matters would be decided centrally.
"The
good which was in Nazism still lives in the German heart," Ellersiek said. His party offered "a new revolution for Germany
which will set the pattern for Europe". This
revolution is to be
the work of the new elite, the German prototype of the future
rulers of Europe . . . which has emerged purified from Nazism
and the trials of war."
"The European Union is a strategic deception operation. Masquerading as a means of institutionalising 'cooperation', it has been more accurately described by the cynical former President
Mikhail Gorbachev as 'the new
European Soviet'. Far from primarily representing a vehicle for furthering the various interests of its members,
the European Union is in reality a Political Collective -- modelled along classically Leninist lines.
Its Member States have collectivised most of their interests in perpetuity -- a collective act of revolutionary madness, since the EU's real purpose is to strip European countries of their residual political, social and economic independence and sovereignty, and to control and absorb them within itself. It is indeed 'the enemy of its Member States'. The time has long since come for exposure of this corrupt collectivist geopolitical menace, and Christopher Story's book does just that.
"
To prove the case against Barbi, they "followed the money".
Where did the cash flow originate? The Vatican Bank.
This was reported during the Trial in Canadian papers ~1982 for about
a week, with pictures of the Cardinals and Vatican Officials
shown. Then, it appears, the story was pulled.
Plastination, as it was called was an adaptation of
contemporary
microtoming and
embalming practice which incorporated new German plastics in
solution in place of the conventional
paraffin and embalming fluids for replacing cellular
contents with stable materials. Numerous bodies were
preserved during those years including the Plastinators
mistress, which GBR pictured naked, lounging on his sofa
where she remained forever available to him..
The most dramatic of the bodies pictured by
GBR was the
"Horse & Rider" which is either exhibited or has been
re-created by Von Hagen.
Born an English Catholic, Fawkes left Britain to fight as a
Mercenary for the Spanish. He later returned secretly to
England from France to Assassinate the newly Protestant
King
James I in what
has been called the "Gunpowder Plot".
It is inconceivable that the
Jesuits and
Cardinal Richelieu were not
fully knowledgeable and participant in the Operation..
"Listen,
you priests, to this warning .. I will
spread on your faces the excrement of
these animals you offer me, ...
where the excrement goes will I send
you!" Malachi, ~ 430
BC
What may surprise you is that
Saint Patrick was neither Irish, nor Catholic. He
was instead born to Christian parents in Britain during it's
Roman Occupation.
Having been captured and enslaved
by the head-hunting
Irish Celts as a youth,
Patrick was compelled in adulthood to return to
Ireland to confront the Druids
and preach the Good News of
God's free gift of
Reconciliation with God for those who will humble
themselves, and REPENT and BELIEVE in the sufficiency
of Christ's substitutionary death alone to be
"redeemed" from sin. Patrick went to Ireland ~
405 ADwith NO
consultation with
Rome, two generations before there was
even a Pope in Rome. The first Pope would not exist
until 457 AD, and in our view completes the corruption of
the Roman Church
Constantine hoped to avoid by abandoning the
"filth" of Rome and
building a NEW capital in
Constantinople .
Above is the Shrine of
St. Patrick's Bell.. Patrick used the Bell
to announce his arrival to preach the
Good News.
The Bell & Crook became Patrick's emblems among the
illiterate Celts.
Ignatius of Loyola, Spanish General & Counter-Reformer
founder of the Jesuits' Society
1491 - 1556
"The compiler of the Spiritual Exercises
and a gifted spiritual director, Ignatius has been described by
Pope Benedict XVI as being "above all a man of God, who gave the
first place of his life to God...a man of profound prayer." He
is the founder and patron saint of the Society of Jesus."
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in the
lucrative 
