"Natural
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
"Natural
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"
16.10 Maximum
Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to conform
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal BREACH OF TRUST"
FYI,
the ideas that the State assigns
Rights &
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from pre-war Nazi
Germany. Under the British system rights are not
State-given, but God Given.
Buying
into the Court's position that what rights remain are Children's Rights,
is buying into the same position that "<Natural> Parents have no
rights", and Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and they will
likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these days".
This is
completely FALSE. The Judges are Agents of the Crown
and they BY DEFINITION Judges
are WITHOUT CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
1649, only PARLIAMENT
has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was only observed
and documented by individuals sent out by the newly Norman Crown after
the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the laws and
customs of the various peoples of Britain.. This was done with a
view to aggregate existing customs which may vary across the land,
into a unified body of Laws. The Authority quoted by the Commoners
in their administration of
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
Bible and principles
of
Danelaw
The process of documentation took only a couple of
hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body of Law which was
historical, popular, and has served in the intervening centuries as a
Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
Instead their position to promote the "rights" of
a "Parent" in the widest sense of the word, making NO distinction
between NATURAL PARENTS and wannaabe
Legal Parents. They have bowed to
University of Victoria's
assertion that the SCC's
Trociuk Decision"endorses a
Heterosexual View of the Family and must be ignored",
legitimizing the ongoing
Child
Trafficking by the State which views
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in the
lucrative Child Adoption
Market They refuse to be hampered by prior obligations to that
pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can
Veto an Adoption.
It appears that many
"Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United Nations and
Liberal Irwin Cotler's assertion that
the
Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent has
"NO RIGHTS", making the State, not
the Natural Parents the Protector of
the Child..
Without
Cause or Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!
Svend Robinson (right) cries while being supported by his partner
Max Riveron. Robinson claimed "stress" caused him to steal
the jewelry he intended to give his boyfriend. Robinson continues
to practice law in BC following a deal cut with his
Special Prosecutor.
Svend's
Bill C250 added Homosexuals to the super class of groups in Canada's
retarded "Hate Law". who
can destroy in Criminal Court regular Canadians for exercising
Free Speech.
Even France has rejected Homo-marriage (preferring
France's homosexuals to emigrate to Canada?!). International societies
of Women Judges & Lawyers appear to have designated Canada as the
globe's Homosexual habitat of choice:
Meijers Latest news about globalizing Homo-Marriage & Homo-Parenting;
Coming up: 26-29 June 2005, Toronto, Canada, the conference of the
International Lesbian and Gay Law Association (ILGLaw),
Fabian Society, Communitarian
"Wolves in Sheep's' Clothing"
Globalizing National Socialism (Nazism) since 1884
In June 1989,
Gisele Marie Goudreault, 46 disobeyed a court order to hand her son
Orey over to his father, Rod Steinmann of Ponoka, who had been awarded
custody. She fled with the boy to Mexico and lived there for four months
before moving to California. ... Justice Peter Martin condemned
Goudreault's behaviour,
which prevented Orey and his father from being together during the
child's formative years. "They had the right to know and
love each other. "That possibility was totally and irrevocably
destroyed," Martin said. "What this woman did to this man and this
child is every parent's nightmare."2004-02-19
US teen 'discovers own kidnap', BBC
Darrel
should be able to sue Justice Southin PERSONALLY for DAMAGES, but will
that ever happen? All members of the Law Societies have sworn
their First Allegiance to their Society members.
FYI: A member has described a Luciferian Judge
(retired) who calls him up from time to time to discourage him
with Luciferian threats. Morneau's description fo the
"misunderstanding" that had Lucifer cast out of heaven,
and Lucifer's inevitable world conquest / NWO matches that of
the retired Judge as it was related to us by the member.
NOTE: You don't have to believe in "Spooks" to know that
Judges, University Professors & Public Officers who do are very
dangerous.
"Roger
Morneau was involved in demon worship, lived in that world for
many months, and escaped alive. He is able to give us
inside information about it. It does not conform with popular
notes of who parttakes and what the activities are. Roger was
elected to be a member of an elite group of demon worshipers.
When he was about to be permanently initiated he asked for help
from higher powers to leave it alive. Interview with the famous
author of the book titled the same.
"
By
David Carrico featuring
Bill Schnoebelen. Proof of Freemasonry's
connection with ancient Babylonian mystery
religions and the sexual abuse of children
and others during rituals; the promotion of
human sacrifice as a pact with Satan. From a
web-review: The existence of Satanic Ritual
Abuse and Masonic Ritual Abuse are fully
supported by facts, dates and court
convictions. The video is Christian based
with selections from the Bible.
It
is impossible for any of these to be "blood relatives" because
their dissimilar chromosomal numbers
forever bar them from having offspring together.
Similarly, their unequal Chromosomal numbers bar them from
having a common ancestor.
This is a Judge practicing his sexual orientation for decades while
on the BC Bench.
It is inconceivable that the Law Enforcement
officers and other Judges were unaware of all his activities.
Law Enforcement Officers, are of course unable to act without the
support of the Judiciary.
".... she was wrapping up a self-funded
documentary that "named names" and exposed a very high-level,
child-pedophile ring.
That's enough to get anyone killed."
Former
Senator Nancy Schaefer and her husband Bruce have died from
a single shot wound each.
Nancy
was shot once in the back while she lay sleeping. Her husband
Bruce was shot once in the chest.
Both shots were
lethal.
Two shots, Two Kills
The deaths are being handled as
a 'murder-suicide'. More likely Bruce was shot
in the chest while confronting the Shooter having been woken by
the the shot that killed Nancy.
"No kill, no thrill -
no gun, no fun.",
Charles Ng
Son
of an Asian Multimillionaire, "Migrant"
Charles ChiTat Ng is a fine example of how hard
Canadian Law Societies
will fight to keep "Satanists" from being brought to
Justice and how careful they are to keep critical information
from the Canadian Public.
American Extradition advocates on AMERICAN news, described a tape of
Charles ChiTat Ng in
which he forced a bound mother to watch her baby be chopped into pieces and
cooked in a wok for dinner. The baby was then eaten before his sobbing mother's
eyes. After dinner, the mother was raped, mutilated, and murdered. All of this
was recorded
in the Cults' tape library said the Americans during their failing
attempts to extradite Ng to the US from Canada.
"I am a survivor of both ritual abuse and
governmental mind control. My greatest hope in sharing on these
pages is that the information will be helpful to others in
breaking free of coercive cult control and help them realize
that it is really possible to become free."
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.