"Natural
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
"Natural
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"
16.10 Maximum
Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to conform
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal BREACH OF TRUST"
FYI,
the ideas that the State assigns
Rights &
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from pre-war Nazi
Germany. Under the British system rights are not
State-given, but God Given.
Buying
into the Court's position that what rights remain are Children's Rights,
is buying into the same position that "<Natural> Parents have no
rights", and Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and they will
likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these days".
This is
completely FALSE. The Judges are Agents of the Crown
and they BY DEFINITION Judges
are WITHOUT CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
1649, only PARLIAMENT
has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was only observed
and documented by individuals sent out by the newly Norman Crown after
the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the laws and
customs of the various peoples of Britain.. This was done with a
view to aggregate existing customs which may vary across the land,
into a unified body of Laws. The Authority quoted by the Commoners
in their administration of
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
Bible and principles
of
Danelaw
The process of documentation took only a couple of
hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body of Law which was
historical, popular, and has served in the intervening centuries as a
Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
Instead their position to promote the "rights" of
a "Parent" in the widest sense of the word, making NO distinction
between NATURAL PARENTS and wannaabe
Legal Parents. They have bowed to
University of Victoria's
assertion that the SCC's
Trociuk Decision"endorses a
Heterosexual View of the Family and must be ignored",
legitimizing the ongoing
Child
Trafficking by the State which views
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in the
lucrative Child Adoption
Market They refuse to be hampered by prior obligations to that
pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can
Veto an Adoption.
It appears that many
"Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United Nations and
Liberal Irwin Cotler's assertion that
the
Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent has
"NO RIGHTS", making the State, not
the Natural Parents the Protector of
the Child..
Without
Cause or Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!
Svend Robinson (right) cries while being supported by his partner
Max Riveron. Robinson claimed "stress" caused him to steal
the jewelry he intended to give his boyfriend. Robinson continues
to practice law in BC following a deal cut with his
Special Prosecutor.
Svend's
Bill C250 added Homosexuals to the super class of groups in Canada's
retarded "Hate Law". who
can destroy in Criminal Court regular Canadians for exercising
Free Speech.
Even France has rejected Homo-marriage (preferring
France's homosexuals to emigrate to Canada?!). International societies
of Women Judges & Lawyers appear to have designated Canada as the
globe's Homosexual habitat of choice:
Meijers Latest news about globalizing Homo-Marriage & Homo-Parenting;
Coming up: 26-29 June 2005, Toronto, Canada, the conference of the
International Lesbian and Gay Law Association (ILGLaw),
Fabian Society, Communitarian
"Wolves in Sheep's' Clothing"
Globalizing National Socialism (Nazism) since 1884
In June 1989,
Gisele Marie Goudreault, 46 disobeyed a court order to hand her son
Orey over to his father, Rod Steinmann of Ponoka, who had been awarded
custody. She fled with the boy to Mexico and lived there for four months
before moving to California. ... Justice Peter Martin condemned
Goudreault's behaviour,
which prevented Orey and his father from being together during the
child's formative years. "They had the right to know and
love each other. "That possibility was totally and irrevocably
destroyed," Martin said. "What this woman did to this man and this
child is every parent's nightmare."2004-02-19
US teen 'discovers own kidnap', BBC
Darrel
should be able to sue Justice Southin PERSONALLY for DAMAGES, but will
that ever happen? All members of the Law Societies have sworn
their First Allegiance to their Society members.
Vellacott resigns as aboriginal committee
chair, May. 10 2006
Conservative
MP Maurice
Vellacott resigned on Wednesday as chairman of the Commons
aboriginal affairs committee, after sparking controversy over
remarks he made about judges and natives.
But another controversial MP was named as the
Conservatives' choice for his replacement: B.C. MP Colin Mayes.
Mayes recently suggested journalists be "hauled off in
handcuffs" for fabricating stories and falsely accusing
citizens, although he later issued a press release to "retract
without reservation" his comments.
Conservative MP Jay Hill said Mayes's
comments were a "rookie mistake."
"Look, Mr. Mayes obviously has apologized for that," he told The
Canadian Press.
Meanwhile, in a letter that Vellacott issued to all members of
Parliament Wednesday, he said he believed his departure was the
best decision he could make. "I'm saddened as I
voluntarily remove myself from this committee, in that I had
hoped, before this earthly life is over, in some modest way, to
contribute to improving living conditions for First Nations,
Metis and Inuit. I submit to a sovereign God to provide me that
opportunity at some point in the future," Vellacott says.
Vellacott also blamed Liberal partisanship for his resignation,
which he said "will submerge aboriginal issues and make it
extremely difficult to accomplish anything productive on behalf
of our aboriginal brothers and sisters in this committee, in
this Parliament."
The Liberals had tabled a non-confidence motion before the
parliamentary committee seeking Vellacott's resignation, which
would have taken place on Wednesday afternoon. The motion
had been virtually guaranteed approval with the backing of the
NDP and Bloc Quebecois.
"I am told that Mr. Vellacott has realized that it would be best
to step down rather than face the humiliation of the vote,"
CTV's Ottawa Bureau Chief Robert Fife reported.
Supreme Court of Canada steps in
The Saskatchewan MP drew criticism for suggestions he made over
the weekend that Supreme Court judges play god with the law.
Chief
Justice Beverley McLachlin
"herself actually said that when they step into (a judicial
activist) role, all of a sudden there's some mystical kind of
power that comes over them by which everything they ever decreed
is not to be questioned and they actually have these discerning
and almost prophetic abilities
to be able to come and know the mind of the public and they take
on almost these godlike powers," Vellacott told a
Canadian broadcaster.
"She
said that herself. I didn't say that."
The statement prompted the Supreme Court of Canada to take the
unusual step of denying his claims.
Vellacott later released a statement
conceding "McLachlin did not literally use those words" and he
expressed his "apologies in this regard."
Though he has since withdrawn some of his remarks, the
opposition is still fuming.
"Why
did it take the condemnation of the Canadian Bar Association,
the chief justice of the Supreme Court,
aboriginal leaders and a host of other Canadians to get this
prime minister and this member to act in the best interests of
Canada?" Interim Liberal
<PEDOPHILE> leader Bill Graham asked Prime Minister
Stephen Harper during question period on Wednesday.
Harper
responded by lobbing criticism back at
Graham, suggesting there were critics of the judicial system
within the Liberal party.
"Obviously if the
leader of the opposition believes someone with the views on
judicial activism of the member of Saskatoon-Wanuskewin
shouldn't chair a parliamentary committee, surely he believes
they should not be senior critics in his own caucus,"
Harper said.
On Tuesday, the Liberals called for Harper to ask Vellacott to
step down. Harper shot down that demand, saying Liberals
have made far more serious comments in the past about judges
than Vellacott.
Vellacott's appointment to the post of committee chairman
sparked controversy because the MP had defended two Saskatoon
policemen convicted of driving a native man out of town and
leaving him to find his way home in frigid temperatures.
Graham said Tuesday that it is "outrageous
that someone who holds such stereotypical views of Aboriginal
people was chosen by the prime minister to play a leadership
role in addressing their issues."
Opposition politicians aren't the only ones angry over
Vellacott's comments about judges.
The
Canadian Bar Association
issued a statement calling on Harper to force Vellacott's
immediate resignation, saying his ill-informed remarks about the
chief justice of Canada undermine public confidence in the
justice system.
In a letter to Harper, bar association president Brian Tabor
said Vellacott's statements "demonstrate an inability to play a
leadership role on any matter related to the administration of
justice."
Note: It is the
Canadian Bar Association,
not Vellacott who is out of line here, and Tabor the one who
should be resigning. What gives any Law Society, a
creation of an Act of Parliament the right to demand the removal
of an elected Parliamentarian?
Lawyers consistently estimate the homosexual
fraction of the Law Societies & Judiciaries as "forty-something"
percent. That is, a randomly selected Judge or Lawyer is
about thirty times more likely to be homosexual than the
population at large. (BTW, a randomly selected Homosexual
is about forty times more likely to be a
Pedophile than a
randomly selected Canadian.).
The Judiciary now claims the right to
INTERPRET whatever meaning they want into the written Statutes
of Parliament, and refuse to be bound by any literal, contextual
reading of a Statute of Parliament.
By these nefarious
means
Activist Judges
have "interpreted" the Charter to give themselves
Homosexual Marriage
and with it eliminated Natural Parents' rights, obliging - they
claim - our Parliament & Legislatures to replace the term
NATURAL PARENT
with the term
LEGAL PARENT.
Without the knowledge or
consent of the Canadian people, these
Activist Judges
have robbed you of the right to be the Legal Parent of your own
Natural Children.,
We are noticing too that they
are lying to us about what
COMMON LAW is. Ask a few lawyers what Common Law is,
and we guess they will tell you the Lie that it is whatever is
commonly being Ordered by
the Judges at any point in time, and
is therefore very dynamic and cannot be defined. We can
happily tell you this is completely FALSE, and is instead an
admission of their malicious intent.
Byron Prior on Newfoundland's
"Grubstake System" in which men at sea like Byron's
Dad
Randall Prior work not for cash in payment, but for
a Stake in the grub at the
Company Store. The men are kept at sea, while
their wives are impregnated by wealthy businessmen
dispensing not just the "Grub" to the ladies back home.
In time, women who couldn't pay their
Debts became a commodity to be sold by the
Company Store like any other product open for Offer
and Exchange of goods and services there by Barter.
The stores became a Storefront for prostitution and
trading favors among the Wealthy of the community.
It appears that the Wealthy in Newfoundland have
thoroughly co-opted the Courts and Medical Professions
there, and have made the
"Grubstake System" and
Child
Prostitution in Newfoundland privately acceptable
and "normal" among the very wealthy.
Michael Shrimpton answers questions about the
European Union and the
present state of affairs. American Politics, Global Warming,
Barak Obama, and the Legitimacy of the European Community. Is it
legal? Are we bound by the Treaties? Is the Treaty Law, and
other questions. (Disclaimer: Views and opinions presented here
are for informational and educational purposes only and may not
necessarily be those of the makers of this video)
Canadian Bar Association demands resignation of MPs
who criticize Activist Judges
Brian Tabor President
Never
Vote for a Lawyer, the Law Societies already run the Courts, and
demand the Resignation of MPs who criticize Activist Judges.
The
Canadian Bar Association is now demanding the Assets of
unmarried couples in BC to be ceased by the Family Courts for
redistribution among fellow CBA members..
Lawyers consistently estimate the
homosexual fraction of
the Law Societies & Judiciaries as "forty-something" percent.
That is,
a randomly selected Judge or Lawyer is about thirty
TIMES more likely to be homosexual than the population at large
"...
40% of "Family Assets" is the minimum Fee <Lawyers> demand, .. would go
for everything, but the Law Societies set the upper limit at
60% which some firms recognize."
The Canadian Bar
Association is now demanding the Assets of unmarried couples in
BC to be ceased by the Family Courts for redistribution among
fellow CBA memebers..
Born an English Catholic, Fawkes left Britain to fight as a
Mercenary for the Spanish. He later returned secretly to
England from France to Assassinate the newly Protestant
King
James I in what
has been called the
"Gunpowder Plot"
of 1605 .
It is inconceivable that the
Jesuits and
Cardinal Richelieu were not
fully knowledgeable and participant in the Operation..
The Courts and other
Law professionals are
firstly Clerks
and Stewards of WRITTEN and
histori
British
Common Law having since
1649NO
LEGISLATIVE POWERS.
The Courts, the Law Societies and many other Offices
of the public service are themselves Creations of Parliament by
virtue of PARLIAMENTARYSTATUTE. They cannont be anything other than
SUBORDINATE
to Parliament. The Courts and the
Law Societies have no
Jurisdiction other than that delegated to them by Parliament.
The Court's role is to
ADMINISTER the
Statutory Laws, tested for "Fairness" against the
historic benchmark of British Common Law, but always with
NO LEGISLATIVE POWERS and
always witout capacity to create Law.
In
recent years, Courts and Lawyers have brazenly referred to Judges Orders as
"Case Law", in what is clearly a Criminal Breach of
Trust, that has yet to be successfully struck down by Parliament.
"HELP invents ideological policy-based evidence to
push for increasing institutional child care and decreasing the
time children spend with parents"
Clyde Hertzman wants to know everything he can about about
your family and children. He and his
Human Early Learning Partnerships program has been
successful in subverting our privacy laws to legalize his
collection, analysis, and reporting of your family's
personal information to global policy makers.
"In spite of credible revelations dating
back to April 2002 about Bill Graham, a sex addicted bi-sexual
sodomizing a 15 year old male prostitute named
Lawrence Metherel, Paul Martin
allowed Graham to remain
Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister - and eventually named him
to the portfolio of Minister of Defense.
"On Sept. 28/2005 a vote was held in Parliament to raise the age
of consent from 14 (one of the lowest age of consents in the
world) to 16 (an age which many still consider too low).
"Bill Graham, Paul Martin, and Anne
McLellan, on Sept. 28th, voted against raising the age of
consent to 16
"This study analyzes family law decisions at the Ontario Court of
Appeal from the mid 1990’s to the mid 2000’s. Records from 7 judges are compared
for over 140 family law cases. ...
It can be concluded
a man had a 96.4 % chance of losing on all issues, but a
woman had a 92.9 % chance of winning on at least some issues when appearing
before
Justice
Rosalie Abella .."
Canadian Law Societies' Failure to Self Regulate on
Corruption
Law Society Members permitted to Lie in Court
To each of the Professional Societies are
delegated by Statute of Parliament the powers of Self-Licensing
and Self-Regulation. These powers of Self Regulation are
created in the
Law Society Acts, the
Professional Engineers Acts; the
Judges Acts and so forth. Being creations of
Parliament, the the created Societies are inherently
subordinate to Parliament.
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in the
lucrative 
