"Natural
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
"Natural
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"
16.10 Maximum
Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to conform
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal BREACH OF TRUST"
FYI,
the ideas that the State assigns
Rights &
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from pre-war Nazi
Germany. Under the British system rights are not
State-given, but God Given.
Buying
into the Court's position that what rights remain are Children's Rights,
is buying into the same position that "<Natural> Parents have no
rights", and Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and they will
likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these days".
This is
completely FALSE. The Judges are Agents of the Crown
and they BY DEFINITION Judges
are WITHOUT CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
1649, only PARLIAMENT
has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was only observed
and documented by individuals sent out by the newly Norman Crown after
the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the laws and
customs of the various peoples of Britain.. This was done with a
view to aggregate existing customs which may vary across the land,
into a unified body of Laws. The Authority quoted by the Commoners
in their administration of
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
Bible and principles
of
Danelaw
The process of documentation took only a couple of
hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body of Law which was
historical, popular, and has served in the intervening centuries as a
Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
Instead their position to promote the "rights" of
a "Parent" in the widest sense of the word, making NO distinction
between NATURAL PARENTS and wannaabe
Legal Parents. They have bowed to
University of Victoria's
assertion that the SCC's
Trociuk Decision"endorses a
Heterosexual View of the Family and must be ignored",
legitimizing the ongoing
Child
Trafficking by the State which views
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in the
lucrative Child Adoption
Market They refuse to be hampered by prior obligations to that
pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can
Veto an Adoption.
It appears that many
"Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United Nations and
Liberal Irwin Cotler's assertion that
the
Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent has
"NO RIGHTS", making the State, not
the Natural Parents the Protector of
the Child..
Without
Cause or Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!
Svend Robinson (right) cries while being supported by his partner
Max Riveron. Robinson claimed "stress" caused him to steal
the jewelry he intended to give his boyfriend. Robinson continues
to practice law in BC following a deal cut with his
Special Prosecutor.
Svend's
Bill C250 added Homosexuals to the super class of groups in Canada's
retarded "Hate Law". who
can destroy in Criminal Court regular Canadians for exercising
Free Speech.
Even France has rejected Homo-marriage (preferring
France's homosexuals to emigrate to Canada?!). International societies
of Women Judges & Lawyers appear to have designated Canada as the
globe's Homosexual habitat of choice:
Meijers Latest news about globalizing Homo-Marriage & Homo-Parenting;
Coming up: 26-29 June 2005, Toronto, Canada, the conference of the
International Lesbian and Gay Law Association (ILGLaw),
Fabian Society, Communitarian
"Wolves in Sheep's' Clothing"
Globalizing National Socialism (Nazism) since 1884
In June 1989,
Gisele Marie Goudreault, 46 disobeyed a court order to hand her son
Orey over to his father, Rod Steinmann of Ponoka, who had been awarded
custody. She fled with the boy to Mexico and lived there for four months
before moving to California. ... Justice Peter Martin condemned
Goudreault's behaviour,
which prevented Orey and his father from being together during the
child's formative years. "They had the right to know and
love each other. "That possibility was totally and irrevocably
destroyed," Martin said. "What this woman did to this man and this
child is every parent's nightmare."2004-02-19
US teen 'discovers own kidnap', BBC
Darrel
should be able to sue Justice Southin PERSONALLY for DAMAGES, but will
that ever happen? All members of the Law Societies have sworn
their First Allegiance to their Society members.
Many
thanks to the
Western Standard for reporting Jeremy's Story. Jeremy is a
nominee for Equal Parenting's "Shadow-Parliament".
Pamela Cross, Feminist Law: Female Accusers
must not be required to face those they accuse of Violence
Pamela Cross, Feminist Lawyer Biography
"Pamela Cross is a feminist lawyer, particularly
known for her expertise on family law issues as they relate to
violence against women. She is a consultant with a number of
women's organizations, primarily as Director of Strategic
Planning and Policy at the
National Association of Women and the Law. She was the
Director of Advocacy and Public Policy with YWCA Canada and the
Legal Director of
Metropolitan Action Committee on Violence Against Women and
Children. Pamela is a member of the Conference Coordinating
Group."
FYI, the organizations employing Pam Cross
will likely be vehicles of the Femi-Nazi Propaganda machine
promulgating their hatred for heterosexual men and fathers.
We
request the organizations Pam cites be DENIED ALL PUBLIC
FUNDING, and perhaps hold them culpable for misuse of
public funds
and demand repayment of misspent funds..
For the horrific damage they've done to
Canadian Families and Non-Custodial Fathers in personal Claims
for Damages - if you've been a Victim of the
VAWA type of lies in Family Court - we suggest you
consider pursuing a formal Complaint at the (likely crooked) Law
Society and a Tort action for Damages for yourself and your
children against lying Feminist Lawyers and "Women's' Studies"
Law Professors..
"I am a feminist lawyer, working as an
advocate and activist for women’s equality. My expertise and
primary area of interest is in
violence against women and the law. For a number of years, I
had a law practice in which I represented primarily women who
had experienced violence and those who provided services to
them. My clients included women with or leaving abusive
partners, women who had experienced sexual violence and battered
women’s shelters and rape crisis centres. My work took me into
family, child protection and criminal court as well as before
tribunals, professional regulatory bodies and the human rights
commission. Over my years in practice, it became clear to me
that women were being systemically denied equal treatment in
whatever legal or quasi-legal system they found themselves and
that systemic advocacy within the legal realm was essential to
women’s equality.
"In 1998, I joined the Metropolitan Action
Committee on Violence Against Women and Children (METRAC,
www.metrac.org ) as Legal
Director, where I established the Ontario Women’s Justice
Network (OWJN, www.owjn.org ).
While at METRAC, I was involved with policy analysis of women’s
equality issues, law reform consultation with all levels of
government, development and presentation of legal information
workshops, training and education sessions for police, Crown
Attorneys and other professionals, development and delivery of
legal information teaching materials for use by abused women and
women’s shelter and sexual assault centre workers. I was the
legal writer for OWJN’s website, which offered basic, plain
language legal information written from a feminist perspective
for women experiencing violence who wanted to know about their
rights and responsibilities.
"After leaving METRAC, I took the position
of Executive Director with the National Association of Women and
the Law (NAWL, www.nawl.ca), an organization that uses research,
writing, education and lobbying to work for the equality of all
women in Canada. This was a short-lived move, since NAWL lost
its traditional funder when the Stephen Harper government
eliminated women’s equality advocacy from the mandate of Status
of Women Canada. I joined the staff of YWCA Canada’s National
Office in 2007 as Director of Advocacy and Public Policy, where
I developed public policy and advocacy strategies for the YWCA’s
30+ Member Associations.
"I was a member of the Management
Committee of Ontario’s Family Law Education for Women Project
(FLEW, www.onefamilylaw.ca
), which, through a collaborative project involving a number of
women’s equality and public legal information organizations,
developed plain language legal information on women’s rights
under Ontario family law.
From 2007 – 2009, I was a member of Ontario’s Domestic Violence
Advisory Council, which provided recommendations to the Minister
Responsible for Women’s Issues, Deb Matthews. You can read our
report and recommendations at the Ontario Women’s
"Directorate website (
www.citizenship.gov.on.ca/owd ). Since mid-2008, I have
worked as a consultant and trainer with a wide variety of
women’s equality/violence against women organizations, on such
topics as legal issues faced by survivors of male violence,
sexual assault, record keeping, disclosure, duty to report,
confidentiality and custody and access law. I provide
consultation services to a number of organizations with respect
to policy development and have developed and delivered strategic
planning to several women’s organizations in Ontario.
"My training work includes online legal
information courses for frontline workers (with Springtide
Resources,
www.springtideresources.org ), development of curriculum for
Legal Aid Ontario’s domestic violence training for lawyers and
work with the
National Judicial Institute.
"At the present time, my major projects
include working with Luke’s Place Support and Resource Centre
for Abused Women and Children, as the Legal Director of the Pro
Bono Summary Advice Clinic. This unique clinic brings together
pro bono lawyers and Legal Support Workers to assist
unrepresented abused women through the family court process. I
am also continuing to work with the National Steering Committee
of NAWL in a strategic planning capacity, as the organization
works to find a way to continue to operate without reliable
government funding. I am a frequent speaker on national radio
and television and at provincial and national conferences on the
topic of violence against women and the law.
World Health Organization (WHO) gags unbiased
Domestic Violence
studies, demands falsified
reporting on Violence Against Women
"In situations where very low levels of
violence are documented or there are results that are otherwise not expected,
the findings should be discussed with key informants and different community
groups before being widely disseminated. Where these groups question the
validity of the findings, their concerns should also be presented during
dissemination activities."
"The Family
Courts are a bunch of second rate hangers-on
... build each other's businesses through
referrals...Family Law is a <parasitic> self-sustaining
Industry"
FYI: A member has described a Luciferian Judge
(retired) who calls him up from time to time to discourage him
with Luciferian threats. Morneau's description fo the
"misunderstanding" that had Lucifer cast out of heaven,
and Lucifer's inevitable world conquest / NWO matches that of
the retired Judge as it was related to us by the member.
NOTE: You don't have to believe in "Spooks" to know that
Judges, University Professors & Public Officers who do are very
dangerous.
"Roger
Morneau was involved in demon worship, lived in that world for
many months, and escaped alive. He is able to give us
inside information about it. It does not conform with popular
notes of who parttakes and what the activities are. Roger was
elected to be a member of an elite group of demon worshipers.
When he was about to be permanently initiated he asked for help
from higher powers to leave it alive. Interview with the famous
author of the book titled the same.
"
National
Post’s columnist extraordinaire,
will join Kari and Terry for what is
sure to be a lively, educational and
no-holds-barred discussion of how
the bully tactics of radical
feminism have adversely affected our
courts, social policies and
families. This is a must listen to
and forward to your friends
interview”! Check out Barbara Kay’s
website
here and
click here to read her speech on
the betrayal of the feminist ideal –
“Who’s oppressing who?”
".... The
Steering Committee of the WHO Study agreed that interviews with men
should not be included, largely because of the logistic and safety
implications of interviewing men and women in the same study. The
Committee recognized the importance of getting accurate data on violence
from men but considered that such an endeavour was worthy of its own
study. ..."
"The Family
Courts are a bunch of second rate hangers-on
... build each other's businesses through
referrals...Family Law is a <parasitic> self-sustaining
Industry"
In
a just world, Englishwoman
Erin Pizzey, who founded the
world's first shelter for battered wives in 1971,
would be a sought-after speaker on the subject of
domestic violence. In the real world, however, Pizzey's
name is a byword for politically incorrect apostasy.
Pizzey's
crime? A humanist, she challenged the belief system
dictated by radical feminists, who colonized her shelter
and made her presence untenable. Their ideological
mantra, still alive and kicking, insists that men are
the default perpetrators in domestic violence (also
known as "intimate partner violence," or IPV, in the
jargon) while women are invariably innocent victims who
inflict violence only in self-defence. But Pizzey knew
from her own experience (her wealthy, socially elite
parents were mutually abusive, and her mother violent to
Erin), and from what the women in her shelter told her,
that most partner violence is reciprocal.
Holding
women responsible for their violence was so at odds with
the received wisdom of the movement's activists that,
for her whistle-blowing pains, Pizzey's dog was killed
and her entire family received death threats. Undaunted,
she pursued her equal-responsibility crusade in the
United States for many years in a fusillade of articles
and books.
While dramatically extreme, Pizzey's story is
nevertheless emblematic of the hostility truth-tellers
confront in the domestic violence industry.
Another
outlier, University of British Columbia psychology
professor Don Dutton, is acknowledged by his peers
as a world expert on IPV. He has proven, over and over
again -- most recently in his definitive 2006 book,
Rethinking Domestic Violence -- that the tendency to
violence in intimate relationships is bilateral and
rooted in individual dysfunction: Men and women with
personality disorders and/or family histories of
violence are equally likely to be violent themselves, or
seek violent partners.
But Dutton's scientific credentials and extensive
25-year archive of peer-reviewed research cut no ice
with Canadian policymakers, none of whom has ever
solicited his advice.
Instead, pseudo-science absolving women of violent
impulses, delivered on demand to interest groups by the
same tiny, incestuous coterie of ideologically
sympathetic professionals, is routinely applied in
training police, family law judges, social workers and
women's shelter personnel.
A lazy, politically correct media dutifully spreads the
party line by reporting uncritically on bogus
selection-biased "studies" by non-accredited
stakeholders, who extrapolate to
the general population
data that are based on testimonials from men in
court-mandated therapy programs or women in shelters.
Ah,
women's shelters! Southern Ontario resident
Mariel Davison offers up a rather damning story of
what happens when naively impartial volunteerism
collides with women's shelter groupthink.
"When it comes to nonreciprocal violence between
intimate partners, women are more often the
perpetrators"
Note also that women in Lesbian relationships are twice
as likely to be violent as those in heterosexual
relationships.
Davison has an honours degree in psychology. A few years
ago, considering herself an "equal opportunity
feminist," she volunteered to serve at a local women's
shelter. During eight weeks' "training," Davison was
subjected to relentless male-bashing and junk science.
That, and the puzzling incongruity of the
female-as-victim message with the battered lesbians who
also sought refuge -- lesbian violence was a taboo
subject amongst trainees -- led to further intellectual
inquiry.
Davison thought her trove of
cutting-edge findings would prove welcome, but instead
they got her turfed by her peers: "I was told I had too
much education to volunteer at the shelter."
Incredulous, Davison dogged the shelter's supervising
and financing government ministries with demands that
they review objective literature, but was stonewalled at
every turn. Nothing came of her campaign.
And nothing will for the foreseeable future, because the
domestic-violence industry is a closed shop, from
Women's Studies courses (don't look for Pizzey's or
Dutton's research there, or in Men's Studies, since
there are none), to women-only shelters, to Status of
Women, to the National Judicial Council, to the Supreme
Court of Canada. They're all reading from the same
myth-riddled hymnbook.
Erin Pizzey and Don Dutton were both keynote speakers at
a recent Sacramento, Calif. conference sponsored by an
independent body, the National Family Violence
Legislative Resource Center (Motto: "Advocating for
nondiscriminatory and evidence-based policies"). Pizzey
accepted a lifetime achievement award to a prolonged
ovation.
Pizzey
told her standing-room-only audience that for gender
politics "Canada is the scariest country on the planet."
Scary to men who suffer because of it, certainly, but
apparently not to most other Canadians, who remain
curiously indifferent to the demonstrable misandry
permeating the institutions that define and shape our
culture.
As many of you will know,
victims of crime (including women who have
experienced male violence) can apply to the
Criminal Injuries Compensation Board for
financial compensation. The Compensation for
Victims of Crime Act, section 9(1)(c) requires
the Board to notify offenders of upcoming
hearings, where practicable (emphasis mine).
Once notified, an offender has the right to
attend the hearing, cross-examine the applicant
and have access to her file.
Until recently, the Board has taken a fairly
relaxed approach to this requirement, treating
it largely as discretionary. It used to waive
notification in cases involving sexual assault,
partner abuse and childhood abuse, even if the
offender had not been convicted.
The Board has changed this practice and is now
interpreting the notification requirement
strictly; insisting on notifying offenders in
all cases where there has not been a conviction.
This leaves women in a very difficult position.
To proceed with an application now means there
is a very real possibility (perhaps even a
likelihood) that their abuser will be present at
the hearing, able to cross-examine them and
review the file.
The University of Ottawa Community Legal Clinic
is fighting back against this change in practice
and has notified the Board that it intends to
challenge the constitutionality of the
legislation. The Board has responded by
suggesting that a policy be developed to address
how notification is handled.
The Clinic has been asked to participate in this
process, and there may be stakeholder
consultations. A recent Memo from the Clinic
Director, Louise Toone, from which the above
information is drawn, encourages interested
parties to make submissions to the Board, either
by sending comments to the Clinic or directly to
the Board.
This is a very important women’s equality and
access to justice issue. I strongly urge any of
you who can to support the stand being taken by
the University of Ottawa Clinic and to make a
submission. You can argue that a women’s
equality approach to victim compensation
requires that women be protected from ongoing
contact with their abusers and that women have a
right to privacy of their files and records, as
is set out in the Criminal Code with respect to
personal records in sexual assault criminal
cases.
Here is the contact information:
Megan Throop
University of Ottawa Community Legal Clinic
17 Copernicus Street
Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5
Fax: 613-562-5602
Email: mthro091@uottawa.ca
"politically correct"
information you read on Domestic Violence is a Scam.
Like taking away the guns, the State is taking out the Men as
part of their Disarmament program in preparation for the New
World Order.
Note that a common trick used by the "Femi-Nazi" type "scholars"
in
our "Women's Studies"
faculties to support their Misandric
Propaganda is to report Statistics drawn women's REPORTS of
domestic violence to Police rather than actual VERIFIED
INCIDENTS of Domestic Violence. What these Statistics
actually tell you is that women are far more likely to LIE about
Domestic Violence than men in reporting violence.
In Canada it's not very likely that a man will even report
Domestic Violence if he knew that RCMP policy is to always make
an arrest in cases of Domestic Violence, and the one they will
arrest is the "heaviest" Spouse. You will not be surprised
that like Law, Police work is a career Lesbians have pursued
vigorously, and that a man calling the RCMP for help is most
likely going to get ridiculed or beaten even more by a SWARM of
these these female RCMP.
Recall that
Aaron Russo tells us that the
Rockefellers claimed that "Feminism" was their idea, and
funded by them not to emancipate women, but to get women out of
the Child Rearing business so children would have to be raised
entirely by the State. See also
Griffin, G. Edward
BTW,
now that women are about as likely to be in the workplace as
men, it is now found that women are now far MORE likely to be
Violent, commit Adultery, and be Promiscuous than men.
Pamela Cross, Feminist Law, University of
Ottawa
Female Accusers must not be required to face those
they accuse of Violence
"Women
must not
be subjected to cross-examination by those they have accused of
violence"
FYI the rate of violence and murder in
lesbian relationships is bizarrely high when compared to
heterosexual couples. Sexual mutilation of the corpse is
very common, but rarely reported in the papers for fear of "offending the
"gays".
A characteristic of
Narcissism is a liberal flow of double talk & double
standards..
Following .. is a chronic
Scapegoating of a relatively innocent third person or class
of persons
We believe
FemiNarcissism < is>
a mental illness
which is LEARNED, ..
through ..
indoctrination
and threat of course Failure at Universities and
High Schools.
Psychopaths are surprisingly common, being estimated at around
10% of the population.
"...
our domestic laws, both provincial and
federal, delineate freedom of expression (or
"free
speech") in a manner that is somewhat
different than the approach taken in the
United States.
...
...
could in fact lead to criminal charges.
Outside of the criminal realm, Canadian
defamation laws also limit freedom of
expression
"Trociuk is .. a
disheartening endorsement of biological concepts of parenthood
... flawed .... it legitimizes a heterosexual view of the family. ..
It must be ignored."
Domestic Violence Scam & Women's Studies'
Hate
Propaganda
".... The Steering Committee of the WHO Study agreed that interviews
with men should not be included ..."
"In situations where very low levels of violence are documented or
there are results that are otherwise not expected, the findings should
be discussed with key informants and different community groups before
being widely disseminated."
Rockefeller Foundation is a Sponsor of the World
Health Organization
Domestic Violence Scam & Women's Studies'
Hate
Propaganda
".... The Steering Committee of the WHO Study agreed that interviews
with men should not be included ..."
"In situations where very low levels of violence are documented or
there are results that are otherwise not expected, the findings should
be discussed with key informants and different community groups before
being widely disseminated."
Rockefeller Foundation is a Sponsor of the World
Health Organization
"...
our domestic laws, both provincial and
federal, delineate freedom of expression (or
"free
speech") in a manner that is somewhat
different than the approach taken in the
United States.
...
...
could in fact lead to criminal charges.
Outside of the criminal realm, Canadian
defamation laws also limit freedom of
expression
"Natural
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
"Natural
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"
16.10
Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to conform
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal BREACH
OF TRUST"
FYI,
the ideas that the State assigns
Rights &
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from pre-war
Nazi Germany. Under the British system rights are
not State-given, but God Given.
Buying into the Court's position that what rights
remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same position
that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and Canadian Children
are at birth the property of the Courts.
Presently, the burden of proof is on the Accused to prove
themselves innocent (unless you are in a Criminal Court), Rare is the Judge who enforces Perjury laws against a
woman.
"Mary Woo Sims, the former chief commissioner of the
BC Human Rights Commission,
is a hero to some in the gay and lesbian community for her record as
a defender and promoter of human rights.
Sims, a motorcycle-riding lesbian, lost a bid last year to
get elected to Coquitlam city council",
Georgia Straight
If you don't want to go nuts in the Family Law Industry, you'd
better prepare yourself to recognize
Peck's previously
undescribed psychological class of what he calls "Evil" people.
"M. Scott Peck, M.D. <Psychiatrist> wrote a most important book for
our times,
People of the Lie, The Hope For Healing Human Evil, published in
1983 by Simon & Schuster. It’s a study of human evil. Peck said he
chose the title “because lying is both a cause and a
manifestation of evil. It is partly by their lying that we recognize
the evil.”
Peck’s analysis of the Mylai massacre, its massive cover-up and the
deceptions made by our government in the Viet Nam war should not be
missed for its lessons for us today."
The common practice in BC Courts when Fathers
do not pay Child Support -
which most of the time is merely
Imputed - is to send non-paying Father to Prison until he
or his family members pay the fees imposed by the Judge.
Even when mothers agree that Child Support
should no longer be paid, we find that the
Family Enforcement
agencies, which are private contractors functioning as
Bounty Hunters, typically refuse to end their claim on the
father's income,.
"I get government cheques..... you stupid
Canadians.. I get government cheques."
Canadian Affirmative Action programs coupled with massive
immigration from "non-traditional" sources to accommodate UN commitments
precluded white males and many white females from employment and progressive
employment in government offices.
These same White Males are now routinely subjected to
Imputed
Income by Family court Judges - the majority of whom are beneficiaries of
Affirmative Action programs - when Dad's incomes aren't as high as the Judge
expects them to be.
Arnie Hein is embarking on a
cross-Canada cycle to raise awareness regarding the Father being
stripped of
the family by the Family Court System. He is seeking fairness.
" I
want my kids back, at least half the time. I want this law that
removes children from their fathers - and fathers from their
children -to change. I am cycling across Canada to raise
awareness of this problem.
I need other fathers to know they are not alone. I want to unify
the men and children abused by this Family Court System. It is
important that the general public becomes aware of this problem.
"
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and they
will likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these days".
This is completely FALSE. The Judges are
Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT
CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
1649, only PARLIAMENT has
the Capacity to make Law.
"Honourable
senators know that I have studied a terrible and pernicious
heart of darkness that has developed in our court system, being
the use of
FALSE ACCUSATIONS in civil justice.
This is the
mischief of litigating parties, usually mothers, suddenly within
the context of divorce and within child custody proceedings
falsely accusing the other party, usually fathers, of the sexual
abuse of their own children. ,,,
These
FALSE ALLEGATIONS are often made with the overt or
covert complicity of their lawyers. They are a lethal weapon in
the business of parental alienation. They are a tool for
achieving sole custody of children and creating fatherlessness."
Hester Lessard, UVic Feminist Law Prof:
Heterosexual View of Parenthood must be ignored
"Trociuk is .. a
disheartening endorsement of biological concepts of parenthood
... flawed .... it legitimizes a heterosexual view of the family. ..
It must be ignored."
"every
girlfriend I met declined to have a serious relationship,
claiming I was not free to marry because of child-support
obligations cutting into a future household."
Patricia Ireland: Lesbian YWCA Chief & NOW
President
"NOW President Patricia Ireland led the
largest, most visible and most successful feminist organization in the
United States for 10 years, from 1991-2001.
In
"Women and the Process of Constitutional Reform"
McLellan warns that
<Horrors!>
"Provincial
Legislatures may impose a presumption of Joint
Custody... and perpetuate the domination of men over
women"
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in the
lucrative 
More:
