Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"
Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to conform
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal BREACH OF TRUST"
the ideas that the State assigns
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from pre-war Nazi
Germany. Under the British system rights are not
State-given, but God Given.
into the Court's position that what rights remain are Children's Rights,
is buying into the same position that "<Natural> Parents have no
rights", and Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and they will
likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these days".
completely FALSE. The Judges are Agents of the Crown
and they BY DEFINITION Judges
are WITHOUT CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
1649, only PARLIAMENT
has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was only observed
and documented by individuals sent out by the newly Norman Crown after
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the laws and
customs of the various peoples of Britain.. This was done with a
view to aggregate existing customs which may vary across the land,
into a unified body of Laws. The Authority quoted by the Commoners
in their administration of
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
Bible and principles
The process of documentation took only a couple of
hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body of Law which was
historical, popular, and has served in the intervening centuries as a
Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
Svend Robinson (right) cries while being supported by his partner
Max Riveron. Robinson claimed "stress" caused him to steal
the jewelry he intended to give his boyfriend. Robinson continues
to practice law in BC following a deal cut with his
Bill C250 added Homosexuals to the super class of groups in Canada's
retarded "Hate Law". who
can destroy in Criminal Court regular Canadians for exercising
Even France has rejected Homo-marriage (preferring
France's homosexuals to emigrate to Canada?!). International societies
of Women Judges & Lawyers appear to have designated Canada as the
globe's Homosexual habitat of choice:
Meijers Latest news about globalizing Homo-Marriage & Homo-Parenting;
Coming up: 26-29 June 2005, Toronto, Canada, the conference of the
International Lesbian and Gay Law Association (ILGLaw),
Fabian Society, Communitarian
"Wolves in Sheep's' Clothing"
Globalizing National Socialism (Nazism) since 1884
In June 1989,
Gisele Marie Goudreault, 46 disobeyed a court order to hand her son
Orey over to his father, Rod Steinmann of Ponoka, who had been awarded
custody. She fled with the boy to Mexico and lived there for four months
before moving to California. ... Justice Peter Martin condemned
which prevented Orey and his father from being together during the
child's formative years. "They had the right to know and
love each other. "That possibility was totally and irrevocably
destroyed," Martin said. "What this woman did to this man and this
child is every parent's nightmare."2004-02-19
US teen 'discovers own kidnap', BBC
The comments on Nicholson exemplify the problem of having
Lawyers elected as Parliamentarians and <horrors!> a Minister.
lawyer's loyalty is ALWAYS to his "brothers" and "sisters" in
his Law Societies. We propose a lawyer is NEVER appointed
as "Solicitor General" etc. and instead ALWAYS appoint as
Minister of Justice a Doctor or Engineer whose Societies
actually DISCIPLINE their members to avoid the all too clear
Conflict of Interest. a Lawyer as a Minister "with portfolio" is
inevitably in. We propose amending the Law Societies Act
and the Elections Act to PRECLUDE lawyers and Judges from
running for office.
Remember too that the rapid Remedy to hammer down the Activist
Judges in a Province is the exercise of the Notwithstanding
Clause. A Province who has exercised the Notwithstanding
Clause, for example, would not have to accept Homosexual
Marriage, Homosexual Sex Ed in the schoo-ls, the routing of
Natural Parent's Rights from our Statutes, or or the forced
acceptance of the Law Societies' love of cross-dressing orgies
across the street or behind the Bench.. At least in
the US, when a Judge is caught masturbating while passing
Sentence, he is promptly removed. NOT SO, sadly, in
Canada. Here the removal of a Judge may require
prosecution for insubordination by a NON-lawyer Solicitor
General, or Appeal to our NOBLE Queen.
2005-12-22 Top court redefines obscenity"In
a landmark ruling that shifts the legal ground under
Canadian sexual behaviour, the Supreme Court of Canada said
.. swingers clubs didn't break obscenity laws because the
group sex caused no harm ... to society as a whole."
The decision -- hailed as a "stamp of approval" by
swingers-club owners and deplored by conservative groups as
a licence for libertine behaviour -- essentially legalizes
group-sex clubs as long as participants are consenting
What? No Public Health concerns? No concern
about the cost to the Health System: e.g. Liberals' 60
Million $ promises for AIDS patients? What are we
going to do with these
Activist Judges now dictating unsanctioned powers over
our family lives and communities? We need to
Separate the Judiciary from the Law
Societies to protect the good lawyers and make the Law
Societies independent of manipulative Judges.
McKelvey of the Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench ruled that
Alex Chapman must immediately return "all documents, emails
and photographs" ever sent to him by Winnipeg lawyer Jack
King. <WHY? they are
HIS property now!!!! McKelfy is using the Bench for
Damage Control for her buddies on the MQB!!>
McKelvey's ruling also compels Chapman, of Winnipeg, to ask
that any of the material held by someone else be returned.
He is forbidden to distribute the material to anyone else.
show King's wife, Justice Lori Douglas, associate chief
justice of the family division of the Court of Queen's
Bench, naked and in various forms of bondage, with sex toys
and performing oral sex.
So.. apparently Douglas and her husband (also a lawyer) wanted
to "expand" their repertoire of intimate behavior to include
another man - Chapman.
To induce him to join them, they send spicy emails and
photographs to this gentleman - Jack King's former client.
How could that possibly go wrong?
Now - let's have a little look at Lori Douglas (sorry, no nude
pictures here my friend).
During the currency of his divorce file, Alex Chapman, a black
man, was propositioned by Douglas's husband, Jack King, to have
sexual relations with Douglas. At the time of the proposition,
Lori Douglas was a lawyer in the same firm.
WaterWarCrimes lawsuit took a nasty turn today
reflective of the "odious" culture within the British
Columbia Ministry of the Attorney General when BC
lawyer, Hugh Gwillim, jumped to the defence
Provincial Court Chief Judge,
Hugh Stansfield, (shown right) an alleged paedophile
who engaged in the sexual abuse of children as young as
six - according to uncontradicted affidavit
evidence filed in
Canada's Federal Court.
Gwillim's arrogant defence of Judge Stansfield was
destroyed when it was pointed out that the source of the
evidence was a highly credible whistleblower who exposed
Provincial Court Judge David Ramsay as another major
After many frustrating years of
complaints about his
conduct, Judge Ramsay was finally
brought to justice and sentenced to seven years of
<Ramsey received from his
Special Prosecuter a
miniscule sentence for numerous counts involving numerous complainants> He died last year in Canada's famous
Dorchester Prison shortly prior to his expected release.
British Columbia judicial community has a long history
of sexual dysfunction and
child molestors have been regularly appointed to the
bench by insiders at the Ministry of the Attorney
General and Canada's Department of Justice who wish to
keep the judiciary under control through blackmail and
Nude photos of judge contained in complaint,
August 31, 2010
Naked photographs of a senior Manitoba judge
engaged in bondage are part of a man's complaints to legal
watchdogs about the judge's past and that of her husband, CBC
News has learned.
A formal complaint was filed in July with the Canadian Judicial
Council against Lori Douglas, associate chief justice of
Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench (family division). Another
complaint has been lodged with Manitoba's Law Society against
Douglas's husband, Jack King, 64, a Winnipeg family lawyer.
The complainant, computer specialist Alexander Chapman, 44,
alleges that King harassed him in 2003 by pressing him to have
sex with Douglas, who was a lawyer at the time.
Over several weeks, Chapman said King showed him about 30
sexually explicit photos of Douglas, showing her naked in
various forms of bondage, in chains, with sex toys and
performing oral sex.
We recognize that in reporting stories, harm can be one of the
consequences. But we are guided by the principle that important
stories in the public interest must be told, and in doing so we
make our best efforts to minimize any harm that might ensue.
Read more about our decision to publish this story.
Chapman said he became so bothered by King's overtures that he
began sleeping at his St. Mary Avenue office, pretending he was
too busy with work to meet Douglas.
King's lawyer, Bill Gange, said King was suffering from
depression at the time and didn't tell his wife that he had
shown the pictures to anyone — or that he had posted the photos
on a porn website.
An Ottawa legal expert said that even if Douglas, who was
appointed a judge in 2005, was the unwitting victim of a scheme,
the presence of the photos on the internet raises issues about
her ability to perform as a judge.
"If pictures of you naked end up on an internet site, it's quite
difficult to say you have the credibility to be a judge," said
Sébastien Grammond, dean of civil law at the University of
Alexander Chapman says he was shown about 30 sexually explicit
photos of Douglas in 2003.Alexander Chapman says he was shown
about 30 sexually explicit photos of Douglas in 2003. (CBC)
Grammond said a judge ultimately represents the ideal of justice
and therefore the judge's conduct and image reflect on the
justice system as a whole. The judge is, in a sense, the
embodiment of the justice system, something the Supreme Court
has noted in a past judgment.
Grammond doubts that Douglas would have been appointed a judge
if she had disclosed the fact that there were nude photographs
of her on the internet in her application.
There is a question in the application that asks, "Is there
anything in your past or present which could reflect negatively
on yourself or the judiciary and which should be disclosed?"
"I think the facts are sufficiently suspect to warrant
disclosure and to raise very important questions as to whether
such a person should have been appointed a judge," Grammond
Douglas has refused to comment to CBC News on the allegations.
Chapman said he first met Douglas's husband, Jack King, in 2002,
when he retained him from the Winnipeg law firm Thompson Dorfman
Sweatman to handle his divorce.
Jack King says he was coping with the deaths of his best friend
and his brother during his interactions with Chapman.Jack King
says he was coping with the deaths of his best friend and his
brother during his interactions with Chapman. (CBC)
Five months later, Chapman said King invited him out for a drink
and mentioned a porn website devoted to interracial sex,
particularly between black men and white women.
"He was talking to me about websites and stuff, and … he gave me
a website to go to called Darkcavern.com," said Chapman, who is
black and originally from Trinidad.
King supplied him with a password, Chapman said, and told him to
look at a section called "Our White Princesses," where white
women post photos to attract black men. Numerous nude photos of
King's wife, who was a lawyer at the same firm her husband
worked at, were posted there, Chapman said.
"I wanted to puke," Chapman said. "[The pictures] were
disgusting. I couldn't believe my lawyer was doing this to me."
It apparently wasn't the first time King sought out a black man
to have sex with his wife. An ad on the Darkcavern site, seen by
CBC News, shows nude photos of Douglas and seeks a "smooth black
male or Mexican" to join the couple during a trip to Cancun in
The ad specifies that the man is wanted "to seduce her with the
intent of getting her enmeshed in the submissive, multi-partner,
interracial sex scene."
"Husband will help and facilitate," it goes on to say.
Photos of Douglas have since been removed from the Darkcavern
'He looked at me as being a sex object'
Over the next few weeks, Chapman said King sent him more
pictures of his wife and continued to encourage him to engage in
a sexual relationship with her.
Ethics and legality
CBC News presented some of the key facts of this story to a
number of law and ethics experts across Canada, without
revealing the identities of those involved. Here is a sampling
of their opinions:
Prof. Arthur Schafer, director of the Centre for Professional
and Applied Ethics at the University of Manitoba, says the story
raises questions about the responsibility of all the lawyers
If a member of the legal community were to pose for risqué
pictures, even in the privacy of their own home, it would be
"wildly imprudent and reckless" behaviour for a lawyer,
nevermind for a potential or future judge.
Schafer says if someone disclosed this to the committee vetting
an application, "it is inconceivable that a lawyer who discloses
this would become a judge." If no disclosure was made, that
would also be problematic.
In either case, there are public interest questions raised that
need to be answered, he said.
Wayne MacKay, a law professor at Dalhousie University in
Halifax, says in circumstances like these, it is important for
judicial candidates to disclose all relevant information
beforehand. If pictures have appeared online, it raises serious
"In spite of the fact that it's obviously private — and judges
still do have the right to a private life — that kind of picture
when it's public, and that kind of information when public, I
think it would clearly bring the judicial system or the
administration of justice in question, or at least in some
people's mind diminish the court's image."
Alice Woolley, associate law professor at the University of
Calgary, said: "What you do in your bedroom is your business,
regardless of whether or not you're a judge."
But because these pictures went on the internet, it takes it to
a whole new realm, Woolley said. If a prospective judge had been
involved in such a situation, it would be inappropriate based on
our current norms of judging. The applicant would have to
disclose it on their application.
"That person ought to have known that having been in that
position they weren't an appropriate candidate for a Superior
Court appointment," said Annalise Acorn, a law and ethics
professor at the University of Alberta.
"I don't think that a person would have the authority to judge
others, to send people to jail, to award high amounts of money
in damage awards when they had that kind of compromising
materials about themselves out in the public sphere," she said,
stressing that it doesn't matter whether the individual put them
in the public sphere themselves or not.
Chapman said he was emotionally distraught by the advances and
didn't know how to handle his lawyer's persistent proposals. "As
a black person, a black guy, I'm really sad that he looked at me
as being a sex object."
He said he didn't have enough money to switch lawyers and had
been warned by a judge not to delay his divorce case any
As Chapman's divorce was wrapping up, he said he eventually
agreed to meet King and his wife at a Winnipeg restaurant,
fearing his lawyer would not properly represent him if he didn't
comply. King left Chapman alone with Douglas, and they chatted,
according to Chapman's July 14, 2010, complaint to the Manitoba
Law Society. In his complaint, Chapman described the meeting as
feeling like "a first date."
Chapman said the couple invited him to their home in Birds Hill,
northeast of Winnipeg, but he never went and he denies ever
having sexual relations with Douglas.
When his divorce concluded, Chapman said he filed a complaint to
the managing partners at Thompson Dorfman Sweatman. Soon after
the complaint, King left the firm.
Chapman decides to come forward
Chapman received a $25,000 cash payment from King in return for
promises not to take legal action against King and his partners.
As part of the settlement, Chapman said he was required to not
speak about the matter and to destroy all emails, photos and
other materials sent to him by King. He said he signed, but kept
After seven years of silence, however, Chapman decided to come
forward, saying he felt distraught about the matter for a long
time and worried it may have influence in civil court cases he's
involved in, which is related to the divorce he obtained in
2003. CBC News has seen no evidence of such influence.
Chapman said he plans to sue both Douglas and King for sexual
harassment and discrimination.
"I decided I'm tired of protecting Lori Douglas, Jack King and
all these people in a legal field who conduct themselves
inappropriately and get away with it," Chapman said.
Douglas unaware of posting: lawyer
Gange, King's lawyer, citing King's depression at the time, said
the events Chapman alleges were part of an isolated incident and
that King's wife didn't know he was soliciting a client to have
sex with her. Gange said Douglas also was unaware her husband
was posting pictures online.
Gange told CBC News King took time off work on a sick leave
after his interaction with Chapman, and was put under the care
of a doctor. Gange said King's behaviour at the time is not in
any way consistent with his behaviour before or since.
King, in a letter to the Manitoba Law Society, acknowledged that
he did meet and talk about sex with Chapman, but only after
Chapman obtained his divorce in April 2003. He said Chapman
would often initiate the conversations.
"At no time did I have an impression that Mr. Chapman felt
uncomfortable having these discussions with me," King wrote in
the letter, dated Aug. 12, 2010.
He acknowledged that he talked about the possibility of Chapman
having an affair with Douglas, but denied that she had knowledge
"I do regret that I had any conversations or any contact at all
with Mr. Chapman that did not relate strictly to his divorce
issues," he said. "I apologized to Mr. Chapman through Mr. Gange
upon being advised that my conduct had offended Mr. Chapman."
He said he was coping with the deaths of his best friend and his
brother at the time.
A spokesperson for Thompson Dorfman Sweatman said King quit the
firm after the alleged incident on the advice of his doctor.
Douglas remained a partner at Thompson Dorfman Sweatman until
2005, when she was appointed to the Manitoba Court of Queen's
Bench. She was later named associate chief justice and now sits
on the Canadian Judicial Council, an agency that sets policies
for the federal judicial system.
The council is the same agency that hears complaints about the
conduct of federally appointed judges, and the same agency
Chapman sent his complaint to.
Because Douglas is a judge, the council is the only professional
body that can hear a complaint against her.
A Canadian Judicial Council complaint investigation typically
takes three months.
A federally appointed judge can only be removed upon order of
Court orders sperm donor to pay child support
to Lesbians after Breakup
FYI the rate of violence and murder in
lesbian relationships is bizarrely high when compared to
heterosexual couples. Sexual mutilation of the corpse is
very common, but rarely reported in the papers for fear of "offending the
Lawyers consistently estimate the homosexual fraction of
the Law Societies & Judiciaries as "forty-something" percent.
a randomly selected Judge or Lawyer is about thirty
TIMES more likely to be homosexual than the population at large
This is a Judge practicing his sexual orientation for decades while
on the BC Bench.
It is inconceivable that the Law Enforcement
officers and other Judges were unaware of all his activities.
Law Enforcement Officers, are of course unable to act without the
support of the Judiciary.
Senator Nancy Schaefer and her husband Bruce have died from
a single shot wound each.
was shot once in the back while she lay sleeping. Her husband
Bruce was shot once in the chest.
Both shots were
Two shots, Two Kills
The deaths are being handled as
a 'murder-suicide'. More likely Bruce was shot
in the chest while confronting the Shooter having been woken by
the the shot that killed Nancy.
Byron says he protested his being assessed by
his Judges' wife, but
Dr. Dena Orr insisted her professionalism was sufficient to
permit her to assess Byron.
Assessment, of course
determines a patients treatment, medications, and the Conditions
Sexual psychopath. His
'data' mostly came from sexual psychopaths, sex offenders,
criminals, pedophiles, male prostitutes, and promiscuous
homosexuals. Two of his "co-investigators" were serial
Rex King, convicted of 800 counts of child rape involving
both sexes, and
Fritz von Balluseck, an ex-Nazi convicted of the rape-murder
of a ten-year-old girl in Berlin
Kinsey solicited and encouraged pedophiles, at home and abroad,
to sexually violate from 317 to 2,035 infants and children for
his alleged data on normal "child sexuality."
Affirmative Action has made White Heterosexual Anglophone Males (WHAMs) a Class
of employment ineligibility & PC Hatred since 1980
"I get government cheques..... you stupid
Canadians.. I get government cheques.", Korean Realtor
Canadian Affirmative Action programs coupled with massive
immigration from "non-traditional" sources to accommodate UN commitments
precluded white males and many white females from employment and progressive
employment in government offices.
These same White Males are now routinely subjected to
Income by Family court Judges - the majority of whom are beneficiaries of
Affirmative Action programs - when Dad's incomes aren't as high as the Judge
expects them to be.
Svend Robinson (right) cries while being supported by his partner Max Riveron.
Robinson claimed "stress" caused him to steal the jewelry
he intended to give his boyfriend. Robinson continues to
practice law in BC following a deal cut with his
Bill C250 added Homosexuals to the super class of groups in
Canada's retarded "Hate
Law". who can destroy in Criminal Court regular Canadians
for exercising Free
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.