"Natural
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
"Natural
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"
16.10 Maximum
Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to conform
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal BREACH OF TRUST"
FYI,
the ideas that the State assigns
Rights &
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from pre-war Nazi
Germany. Under the British system rights are not
State-given, but God Given.
Buying
into the Court's position that what rights remain are Children's Rights,
is buying into the same position that "<Natural> Parents have no
rights", and Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and they will
likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these days".
This is
completely FALSE. The Judges are Agents of the Crown
and they BY DEFINITION Judges
are WITHOUT CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
1649, only PARLIAMENT
has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was only observed
and documented by individuals sent out by the newly Norman Crown after
the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the laws and
customs of the various peoples of Britain.. This was done with a
view to aggregate existing customs which may vary across the land,
into a unified body of Laws. The Authority quoted by the Commoners
in their administration of
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
Bible and principles
of
Danelaw
The process of documentation took only a couple of
hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body of Law which was
historical, popular, and has served in the intervening centuries as a
Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
Instead their position to promote the "rights" of
a "Parent" in the widest sense of the word, making NO distinction
between NATURAL PARENTS and wannaabe
Legal Parents. They have bowed to
University of Victoria's
assertion that the SCC's
Trociuk Decision"endorses a
Heterosexual View of the Family and must be ignored",
legitimizing the ongoing
Child
Trafficking by the State which views
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in the
lucrative Child Adoption
Market They refuse to be hampered by prior obligations to that
pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can
Veto an Adoption.
It appears that many
"Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United Nations and
Liberal Irwin Cotler's assertion that
the
Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent has
"NO RIGHTS", making the State, not
the Natural Parents the Protector of
the Child..
Without
Cause or Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!
Svend Robinson (right) cries while being supported by his partner
Max Riveron. Robinson claimed "stress" caused him to steal
the jewelry he intended to give his boyfriend. Robinson continues
to practice law in BC following a deal cut with his
Special Prosecutor.
Svend's
Bill C250 added Homosexuals to the super class of groups in Canada's
retarded "Hate Law". who
can destroy in Criminal Court regular Canadians for exercising
Free Speech.
Even France has rejected Homo-marriage (preferring
France's homosexuals to emigrate to Canada?!). International societies
of Women Judges & Lawyers appear to have designated Canada as the
globe's Homosexual habitat of choice:
Meijers Latest news about globalizing Homo-Marriage & Homo-Parenting;
Coming up: 26-29 June 2005, Toronto, Canada, the conference of the
International Lesbian and Gay Law Association (ILGLaw),
Fabian Society, Communitarian
"Wolves in Sheep's' Clothing"
Globalizing National Socialism (Nazism) since 1884
In June 1989,
Gisele Marie Goudreault, 46 disobeyed a court order to hand her son
Orey over to his father, Rod Steinmann of Ponoka, who had been awarded
custody. She fled with the boy to Mexico and lived there for four months
before moving to California. ... Justice Peter Martin condemned
Goudreault's behaviour,
which prevented Orey and his father from being together during the
child's formative years. "They had the right to know and
love each other. "That possibility was totally and irrevocably
destroyed," Martin said. "What this woman did to this man and this
child is every parent's nightmare."2004-02-19
US teen 'discovers own kidnap', BBC
Darrel
should be able to sue Justice Southin PERSONALLY for DAMAGES, but will
that ever happen? All members of the Law Societies have sworn
their First Allegiance to their Society members.
Rationalistic viewpoints of the IPCC,
Ivar Giaever, Kiminori Itoh, Dr. Arun D. Ahluwalia, Victor
Manuel Velasco Herrera, Geoffrey G. Duffy, Dr. David Gee, Hajo
Smit, James A. Peden, Professor Delgado Domingos,- Dr. Takeda
Kunihiko, Dr. Eduardo Tonni,,Professor Ian Plimer, U.S.Senate
comittee on climate change
I have become aware, since starting this
project, of factors mediating scientific rigor. This factor is
the extremely polarized viewpoints on the so called 'global
warming' debate. I suspect the vast majority of people are
persuaded that global warming (if it indeed is still persisting
and this is against the facts conclusion) is due to human causes
(or at least partially so). This is due largely to the work of a
body of scientists calling themselves
paleo-climatologists. They
have become a very powerful director of governmental and public
opinion. It is
important that as you read my submission you understand that a
vast body of climatologists and other related scientists doubt
not only their veracity but lately their integrity. To this end
I will be attaching a note on the objection of 650 international
scientists, of undoubted credibility, who object to what I would
label global warming dogma.
I see these highly credible scientists as essential to combat
the seemingly rationalistic viewpoints of the IPCC
"U.S Senate Committee on Environment & Public Works" website.
A selection of the 600 international scientists' objections
"I am a sceptic ... Global warming has become a new
religion" - Nobel Prize Winner for Physics,
Ivar Giaever.
"Since I am no longer affiliated with any organization nor
receiving any funding, I can speak quite frankly ... As a
scientist I remain sceptical." - Atmospheric Scientist
Dr.
Joanne Simpson, the first woman in the world to receive a PhD in
meteorology and formerly of NASA who has authored more than 190
studies and has been called "among the most preeminent
scientists of the last 100 years."
"Warming fears are the "worst scientific scandal in the
history ... When people come to know what the truth is, they
will feel deceived by science and scientists." - UN IPCC
Japanese Scientist
Dr. Kiminori Itoh, an award-winning PhD
environmental physical chemist.
"The IPCC has actually become a closed circuit; it doesn't
listen to others. It doesn't have open minds ... I am really
amazed that the Nobel Peace Prize has been given on
scientifically incorrect conclusions by people who are not
geologists", - Indian geologist
Dr. Arun D. Ahluwalia at
Punjab University and a board member of the UN-supported
International Year of the Planet.
"The models and forecasts of the UN IPCC "are incorrect
because they only are based on mathematical models and presented
results at scenarios that do not include, for example, solar
activity."-
Victor Manuel Velasco Herrera, a researcher at
the Institute of Geophysics of the National Autonomous
University of Mexico
"It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it
seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don't buy into
anthropogenic global warming." - U.S Government Atmospheric
Scientist
Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research
Division of NOAA.
"Even doubling or tripling the amount of carbon dioxide
will virtually have little impact, as water vapour and water
condensed on particles as clouds dominate the worldwide scene
and always will." -
Geoffrey G. Duffy, a professor in the
Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering of the
University of Auckland, NZ.
"After reading [UN IPCC chairman] Pachauri's asinine
comment [comparing sceptics to] Flat Earthers, it's hard to
remain quiet." - Climate statistician
Dr. William M. Briggs,
who specializes in the statistics of forecast evaluation, serves
on the
American Meteorological Society's Probability and
Statistics Committee and is an Associate Editor of
Monthly
Weather Review.
"For how many years must the planet cool before we begin to
understand that the planet is not warming? For how many years
must cooling go on?" - Geologist
Dr. David Gee the chairman
of the science committee of the 2008
International Geological
Congress who has authored 130 plus peer reviewed papers, and is
currently at
Uppsala University in Sweden.
"Gore prompted me to start delving into the science again
and I quickly found myself solidly in the sceptic camp ...
Climate models can at best be useful for explaining climate
changes after the fact." - Meteorologist
Hajo Smit of
Holland, who reversed his belief in man-made warming to become a
sceptic, is a former member of the Dutch UN IPCC committee.
"Many [scientists] are now searching for a way to back out
quietly (from promoting warming fears), without having their
professional careers ruined." - Atmospheric physicist
James
A. Peden, formerly of the Space Research and Coordination Centre
in Pittsburgh.
"Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a
dangerous nonsense ... The present alarm on climate change is an
instrument of social control, a pretext for major businesses and
political battle. It became an ideology, which is concerning."
- Environmental Scientist Professor Delgado Domingos of
Portugal, the founder of the Numerical Weather Forecast group,
has more than 150 published articles.
"CO2 emissions make absolutely no difference one way or
another ... Every scientist knows this, but it doesn't pay to
say so ... Global warming, as a political vehicle, keeps
Europeans in the driver's seat and developing nations walking
barefoot." - Dr. Takeda Kunihiko, vice-chancellor of the
Institute of Science and Technology Research at Chubu University
in Japan.
"The [global warming] scaremongering has its justification
in the fact that it is something that generates funds." -
Award-winning Palaeontologist
Dr. Eduardo Tonni, of the
Committee for Scientific Research in Buenos Aires and head of
the Palaeontology Department at the University of La Plata.
Why is this issue for this research paper? According to one
international scientist the largest advocate of warming due to
anthropogenic causes is the IPCC (the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change is under the auspices of the UN's
World
Meteorological Organization and the
UN Environmental Program).
According to Plimer it has become a self serving body with a
vested interest in promoting anthropolog' on climate change over
the last millennia only to reinsert the undesirable climate
spikes due to public scrutiny. Its influence is so profound that
associated research organizations have become tightly bound to
producing scientific papers that support desired outcomes. In
other words researchers are arguing towards a predetermined
result. It's chief advocate, Mann, has come under severe
scrutiny by the U.S. Senate investigating climate change for his
lack of scientific rigor. Plimer in particular criticizes him
for "scientific dishonesty".
I mention this since many papers now being
presented are funded by bodies biased towards anthropogenic
causes of "global warming". Global warming has become a major
world industry with highly vested interests in its position. To
my mind this is a great danger to unbiased scientific research
and I mention this since the IPCC specifically has tried to
seriously underestimate the existence of a little Ice Age and a
Roman and medieval warming. Plimer believes this is because
these phenomena put global warming merely as a 'natural'
cyclical change unrelated to their credo of anthropogenic
fundamental cause. Since, for better or worse, this has become
the politically correct topic of our time I urge you to
carefully scrutinize the work of the many contributing authors
to this paper and be aware that many are trying to undermine
their credibility. This at least is my considered opinion and
perhaps my bias.
Strong has built his career acting as the Agent of
various international money men. He is not the driving
force or decision-maker, apparently, and has since the age of
seventeen been transferring ownership of Canadian Resources out
of the country, making himself a Traitor. He has fled to
communist China.
Tax Exempt
Rockefeller Foundation
& Rockefeller Family backs Global Taxation and a Global Soviet
Government
"Some even believe we are
part of a secret Cabal
working against the best interests of the United States,
characterizing
my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of
conspiring with
others
around the world to build a
more integrated global political and
economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I STAND
GUILTY, and I AM PROUD OF IT",
This interview outlines his discovery that some of the largest
Tax Exempt Foundations
are Fabian
Socialists having among their objectives the
assimilation of the West "comfortably merged with
the
Soviet Union" into a single Socialist block.
In preparation for this assimilation, these same
Tax
Exempt Foundations, including the
Rockefeller Foundation are indoctrinating our youngsters
with their tyrannical Socialist perspectives.
Bob Buford created "mentoring" relationships with
Peter Drucker to manifest in western
evangelical churches Drucker's vision for
Global Socialism / Nazism /
Luciferianism. Mentees include at least himself and "Halftime"
members, and the infamous cultist
Rick Warren.
"Like-Minded" Counter-Reformers promoting themselves
into a "Leadership" role and apparently standing with Drucker and Buford
include Bill McCartney,
Bill Gothard, and
James Dobson, All of these
promote "Feminarcissm" and viciously attack fathers who will not
position themselves and their families in the cult's Hierarchy.
“social sector institutions have a
particular kind of purpose .... The ‘product’ of a church is a churchgoer
whose life is being changed. The task of
social-sector organizations is to create human
health and well being.”
.... Peter Drucker
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in the
lucrative 
