Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"
Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to conform
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal BREACH OF TRUST"
the ideas that the State assigns
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from pre-war Nazi
Germany. Under the British system rights are not
State-given, but God Given.
into the Court's position that what rights remain are Children's Rights,
is buying into the same position that "<Natural> Parents have no
rights", and Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and they will
likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these days".
completely FALSE. The Judges are Agents of the Crown
and they BY DEFINITION Judges
are WITHOUT CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
1649, only PARLIAMENT
has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was only observed
and documented by individuals sent out by the newly Norman Crown after
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the laws and
customs of the various peoples of Britain.. This was done with a
view to aggregate existing customs which may vary across the land,
into a unified body of Laws. The Authority quoted by the Commoners
in their administration of
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
Bible and principles
The process of documentation took only a couple of
hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body of Law which was
historical, popular, and has served in the intervening centuries as a
Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
Svend Robinson (right) cries while being supported by his partner
Max Riveron. Robinson claimed "stress" caused him to steal
the jewelry he intended to give his boyfriend. Robinson continues
to practice law in BC following a deal cut with his
Bill C250 added Homosexuals to the super class of groups in Canada's
retarded "Hate Law". who
can destroy in Criminal Court regular Canadians for exercising
Even France has rejected Homo-marriage (preferring
France's homosexuals to emigrate to Canada?!). International societies
of Women Judges & Lawyers appear to have designated Canada as the
globe's Homosexual habitat of choice:
Meijers Latest news about globalizing Homo-Marriage & Homo-Parenting;
Coming up: 26-29 June 2005, Toronto, Canada, the conference of the
International Lesbian and Gay Law Association (ILGLaw),
Fabian Society, Communitarian
"Wolves in Sheep's' Clothing"
Globalizing National Socialism (Nazism) since 1884
In June 1989,
Gisele Marie Goudreault, 46 disobeyed a court order to hand her son
Orey over to his father, Rod Steinmann of Ponoka, who had been awarded
custody. She fled with the boy to Mexico and lived there for four months
before moving to California. ... Justice Peter Martin condemned
which prevented Orey and his father from being together during the
child's formative years. "They had the right to know and
love each other. "That possibility was totally and irrevocably
destroyed," Martin said. "What this woman did to this man and this
child is every parent's nightmare."2004-02-19
US teen 'discovers own kidnap', BBC
shall sodomize your sons, emblems of
your feeble masculinity, of your shallow
dreams and vulgar lies.
We shall seduce
them in your schools, in your
dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your
locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in
your seminaries, in your youth groups,
in your movie theater bathrooms, in your
army bunkhouses4 in your truck stops, in
your all-male clubs, in your houses of
Congress, wherever men are with
Your sons will become our
minions and do our bidding. They will be
recast in our image. They will come to
crave and adore us.",
Funded by the prestigious
and based on thousands of interviews,
had "discovered" that while American men of the World War II
"greatest generation" pretended to be faithful and monogamous,
virtually all of them – 95 percent – were, according to 1948
law, sex offenders. Specifically, Kinsey claimed that 85
percent of males had intercourse prior to marriage, nearly 70
percent had sex with prostitutes, and 30-45 percent of husbands
had extramarital affairs. Moreover, from 10 to 37 percent of men
had engaged in homosexual acts, according to Kinsey.
fact, the oft-repeated claim that one in 10 human beings is
homosexual – a cornerstone of the "gay rights" movement – comes
directly from Kinsey's published research.
In endless and graphic detail, Kinsey painted
a picture of Americans as being amoral sexual animals seeking
If Kinsey had discovered the cure for all
diseases, his press coverage could not have been more extensive
or enthusiastic. Time magazine, Life, Look and most of the rest
of the mainstream press reported that Kinsey – whom they
portrayed as a conservative Republican academic and faithful
family man – had conducted the most exhaustive and scientific
survey ever of Americans' sexual habits. The previously unknown
zoologist – whose only prior claim to fame had been his
exhaustive and painstaking research into the gall wasp – was
catapulted overnight to the status of national hero, in keeping
with Americans' post-war near-worship of science.
The revolutionary "Kinsey Reports," as they
came to be known – including his companion volume released in
1953, "Sexual Behavior in the Human Female" – rocked the
nation's beliefs about itself. But perhaps most shocking of all
were his "findings" on childhood sexuality: The Kinsey Reports
came to the stunning conclusion that children are sexual from
birth, and that youngsters as young as a few months of age have
the capacity for a pleasurable and healthy sexual life.
Despite the radical nature of Kinsey's
findings, he was honored as a heroic scientific pioneer, pushing
back the dark boundaries of ignorance and delivering new
knowledge that would guide America in a brave, new world of
That is, until 1981, when a sole researcher –
a Ph.D. and scholar named Judith Reisman – came along and raised
the question of "Table 34."
Warning: The next section is extremely
disturbing and involves graphic descriptions of child sexual
abuse on which Kinsey admittedly relied in tabulating his "data"
on childhood sexuality.
"Table 34" in Kinsey's first report purports to be a
scientific record of "multiple orgasm in pre-adolescent males."
Reisman wondered: How
did Kinsey and his associates obtain this "research" that
infants as young as five months of age enjoyed sex?
Child sexual abuse is a felony – how could such research be
conducted legally? Why had nobody raised this issue before?
Get ready for a shock. According to Reisman, whose heartbreaking
findings were corroborated subsequently by other researchers:
Kinsey solicited and
encouraged pedophiles, at home and abroad, to sexually violate
from 317 to 2,035 infants and children for his alleged data on
normal "child sexuality." Many of the crimes against
children (oral and anal sodomy, genital intercourse and manual
abuse) committed for Kinsey's research are quantified in his own
graphs and charts.
"Table 34" on page 180 of Kinsey's
"Sexual Behavior in the Human Male" claims to be a
"scientific" record of "multiple orgasm in pre-adolescent
males." Here, infants as young as five months were timed with a
stopwatch for "orgasm" by Kinsey's "technically trained" aides,
with one four-year-old tested 24 consecutive hours for an
alleged 26 "orgasms."
educators, pedophiles and their advocates commonly quote these
child "data" to prove children's need for homosexual,
heterosexual and bisexual satisfaction via "safe-sex" education.
These data are also regularly used to "prove" children
are sexual from birth.
Whoa! Wait a minute. This seems too horrible to be true. You're
got to be thinking, "Why haven't I heard about this before? If
this is true, Kinsey would have been arrested and locked up.
This must be some hysterical anti-sex researcher jumping to
Sorry. For the sake of the children "experimented" upon, one
wishes that were true. But Reisman is a world-renowned expert
and scholar on this subject, has been a consultant to three U.S.
Department of Justice administrations, the Department of
Education and the Department of Health and Human Services, and
is sought worldwide to lecture, testify and counsel regarding
fraudulent sex science. She is speaking the awful truth here.
Reisman reveals that in "Sexual Behavior in the Human Male,"
Kinsey defined children's torment ("screaming," "writhing in
pain," "fainting," "convulsions") as "orgasms" for infants too
young to speak. Who sexually tested these children? Where were
the parents? Among thousands of international reviews of the
Kinsey reports, no one asked these questions of the man who, as
Gore Vidal declared, was "the most famous man for a decade," and
who is the one man the homosexual and pedophile movements today
thank most for their advances. Before we answer these questions,
you need to know a little more about Kinsey.
As I said, Indiana University portrayed Kinsey as a conservative
Republican and family man, and the press totally and
uncritically bought into this image.
Let's take a closer look, shall we?
Alfred C. Kinsey – the universally proclaimed
"father of the sexual revolution," the supposedly conservative
family man, the objective scientific researcher and amiable
academic – was a sexual psychopath.
To begin with, Kinsey was a bisexual who preferred homosexual
sex. Summarizing "Alfred C. Kinsey: A Public/Private Life," the
1997 biography of the scientist by pro-Kinsey author James H.
Jones, Salon's McLemee writes:
He did date a woman, once, and very shortly thereafter asked her
to marry him, which she did. Consummation was delayed for quite
a while, because of their mutual ignorance of the mechanics
involved. At some point in adolescence, Kinsey developed a taste
for masochistic practices of a really cringe-inducing variety.
(Two words here, and then I'm changing the subject: "urethral
insertion.") He also had some pronounced voyeuristic and
exhibitionistic tendencies. On bug-hunting field trips in the
1930s, he liked to march around the camp in his birthday suit,
and he interrogated his assistants about masturbation. That his
career was not destroyed by such behavior is, in itself, pretty
As Jones, Kinsey's key biographer, tells it: "On one occasion
when his inner demons plunged him to new depths of despair,
Kinsey climbed into a bathtub, unfolded the blade of his
pocketknife, and circumcised himself without the benefit of
anesthesia." But Jonathan Gathorne-Hardy, who published another
Kinsey biography, ''Sex, the Measure of All Things: A Life of
Alfred C. Kinsey'' in 1998, said the scientist's gruesome
self-circumcision was part of his ongoing exploration of the
relationship between pain and sexual pleasure. Ah, always the
Reisman adds: "An early adherent and advocate of masturbation,
Kinsey suffered an untimely death due, at least in part, to 'orchitis,'
a lethal infection in his testicles that followed years of
sadistic, orgiastic 'self-abuse.' Kinsey's obsessive, brutally
masochistic masturbation methods appear to have assisted in his
And Caleb Crain, reviewing the new Hollywood film, "Kinsey" –
created to whitewash and popularize the father of the sexual
revolution – wrote in the New York Times:
Mr. Jones's book revealed that Kinsey had had affairs with men,
encouraged open marriages among his staff, stimulated himself
with urethral insertion and ropes, and filmed sex in his attic.
But Mr. Jones did not feel he was debunking Kinsey. ''What I
told myself, and I still think this, was that I was writing a
biography of a tragic hero,'' he says. ''It shouldn't surprise
us that pleas for sexual tolerance would come from a person who
couldn't be himself in public.''
"Both of Kinsey's most recent admiring biographers," summarizes
Reisman, somewhat less euphemistically, "confessed he was a
sadistic bi/homosexual, who seduced his male students and
coerced his wife, his staff and the staff's wives to perform for
and with him in illegal pornographic films made in the family
Kinsey and his mates, Wardell Pomeroy, Clyde Martin and Paul
Gebhard, had 'front' marriages that concealed their strategies
to supplant what they saw as a narrow procreational
Judeo-Christian era with a promiscuous 'anything goes' bi/gay
"OK," you're saying, "OK. So he was a sexual nutcase. But wasn't
his research still solid?"
1) "forced" subjects to give the desired answers to their sex
questions, 2) secretly trashed three quarters of their research
data, and 3) based their claims about normal males on a roughly
86 percent aberrant male population including 200 sexual
psychopaths, 1,400 sex offenders and hundreds each of prisoners,
male prostitutes and promiscuous homosexuals. Moreover, so few
normal women would talk to them that the Kinsey team labeled
women who lived over a year with a man "married," reclassifying
data on prostitutes and other unconventional women as "Susie
By now, you may have been wondering just how today's vaunted
"Kinsey Institute" at Indiana University explains things like
Table 34 with its "data" derived from the criminal sexual abuse
of hundreds of infants and children.
Here's how the official Kinsey Institute website answers this
seemingly unanswerable question:
Where did the childhood sexual data come from?
Reports of childhood sexual behavior were mostly from interviews
of adults recalling their early experiences. Parents and
teachers were also asked if they had noticed sexual reactions in
their children, and some children were interviewed in the
presence of a parent or teacher. Among more than 5,000 men
interviewed for "Sexual Behavior in the Human Male," there were
9 who reported having had sexual relations with children.
One in particular, with an extensive sexual history, is the
source of the childhood response tables in the Male book. Dr.
Kinsey and his staff never conducted experiments with children.
Although Kinsey claimed the child-sexuality information came
from multiple sources, in 1995 then-Kinsey Institute director
John Bancroft insisted it all came from serial pedophile Rex
King, speculating that Kinsey might have "invented" the other
purported sources for his child sexual response data as a way of
In fact, not only did Kinsey use data from Rex King – whom
Kinsey encouraged, in writing, to continue with his "research" –
but also from Nazi criminal Fritz von Balluseck, who was
arrested and investigated for the murder of a 10-year-old girl,
and ultimately convicted of sexual abuse of up to 200 children.
As a Times of London story notes, Kinsey and von Balluseck
corresponded, with Kinsey once warning the Nazi pedophile to
"watch out" so as to avoid being caught.
Today, writes Crain in the New York Times, as a matter of policy
"the institute will not – to the frustration of defenders and
accusers alike – answer questions about King, Balluseck or
anyone else who may have confided in Kinsey."
Obligated to deal in some way with Kinsey's cozy relationship
with child molesters, the "Kinsey" feature film – starring Liam
Neeson as Kinsey and Laura Linney as wife Clara – includes a
brief scene depicting Kinsey's June 1944 meeting with the
63-year-old King, whose diaries included meticulous recording of
sexual encounters with boys.
What isn't shown in the film, however, is the letter Kinsey sent
King urging him to send the diaries. According to Kinsey
biographer Jones, on Nov. 24, 1944, Kinsey wrote to King: "I
rejoice at everything you send, for I am then assured that much
more of your material is saved for scientific publication."
Rejoice at the sexual torture of hundreds of innocent children?
To this day, the North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA),
the world's largest pedophile group, credits Kinsey as its
scientific standard bearer. "Gay liberationists in general, and
boy-lovers in particular, should know Kinsey's work and hold it
dear," says one NAMBLA publication. "Implicit in Kinsey is the
struggle we fight today."
So the "heroic scientist" – whose "research" launched the sexual
revolution and provides the "scientific" basis for it to this
very day – was actually a sexually depraved human being who
"rejoiced" at pedophiles' conducting horrifying, Dr. Mengele-like
sexual experiments on hundreds of children.
Why no mass outcry?
"But," you say, "something still stinks here. If all this is
really true, how come Kinsey hasn't been more widely
discredited? Why is Hollywood making a feature movie glorifying
To be sure, after almost a quarter century of Reisman's tireless
whistleblowing research, her discoveries on Kinsey have been
corroborated and augmented by others. In fact, in April 2004,
with Reisman's help as science adviser, the American Legislative
Exchange Council (ALEC), an organization of 2,400 state
legislators, issued a "State Factor" report titled: "Restoring
Legal Protections for Women and Children: A Historical Analysis
of The States' Criminal Codes." The No. 1 focus of this in-depth
report was the fraudulent "junk science" of Alfred Kinsey.
But when it comes to America's culture, law, beliefs and
attitudes regarding sex, Kinsey is still king – revered to this
day by the vast majority of academics and "experts." Why?
In his book "Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political
Control," Dr. E. Michael Jones sheds some light on why Reisman's
research – even that exposing mass sexual torture and
experimentation on young children in the name of science – has
met with such a tepid response. He writes:
On July 23, 1981, Reisman delivered a paper entitled, "The
Scientist as a Contributing Agent to Child Sexual Abuse: A
Preliminary Study," in which she brought up for the first time
in the 32 years since it had been published, the material on
child sexuality in Tables 30-34 of the Kinsey Male volume and
wondered how this data could have been obtained without
involvement in criminal activity.
Before giving her report, Reisman had written to Male volume
co-author Paul Gebhard to ask about the data in Tables 30-34.
Gebhard wrote back saying that the data had been obtained from
parents, school teachers, and some male homosexuals, including
"some of Kinsey's men" who had used "manual and oral techniques"
to catalogue the number of orgasms they said they could
stimulate in infants and children.
Virtually the entire sex industry/sex research establishment
worldwide was in attendance at the meeting in Jerusalem, but the
reaction to the talk was silence, stunned or sullen or
otherwise, until a Swedish reporter wondered out loud why the
assembled experts had nothing to say.
The silence was understandable. Just about everyone in
attendance had cited Kinsey as their mentor, and some even knew
about the criminal activity involved in Kinsey's research. They
all knew that Kinsey's research was the basis of their
"science," which is to say, the legitimizing basis for
everything they did. Kinsey was the foundation of that house of
cards. If what he had done could be discredited, it threatened
the sexual empire that had been built since his death and upon
which they all depended for a livelihood."
"Sexual empire" is right. Indeed, Reisman documents Kinsey as
the inspiration and mentor for two men that carried forward the
torch of sexual liberation: Hugh Hefner and Harry Hay.
In high school, Hefner had written an essay bemoaning the lack
of explicit discussion of sex in 1950s "Ozzie and Harriet"
America. A few years later, he read Kinsey's "Sexual Behavior in
the Human Male" and praised it in his college newspaper.
Fortified, liberated and turbo-charged by Kinsey's newly
discovered "scientific truth" about human sexuality, Hefner
didn't wait long before creating Playboy magazine, the clubs,
and most of all, the "Playboy philosophy" that has so profoundly
influenced the American psyche.
When Harry Hay, who was sexually molested as a 14-year-old boy,
read Kinsey's claim that 10 to 37 percent of men have had
homosexual experiences, he left his wife and children and began
the campaign to legitimize sodomy. He formed the Mattachine
Society, urging that homosexuals be regarded as a 10 percent
minority class. Hay was the father of the modern "gay rights"
revolution that began in the 1960s.
To this day, Kinsey is still the gold standard in sex research.
In fact, in the more than two decades since she first exposed
the Kinsey fraud in 1981, Reisman notes that the comprehensive
Westlaw electronic legal database has cited Kinsey positively
around 650 times – "on issues from hate crimes and homosexual
marriage to child custody and rape." And the Social Science and
Science Citation Indices, she adds, "reference Kinsey roughly
6,000 times over this same period. On the evidence, Kinsey is
far and away the most influential sex scientist in the law.
Fully 100 percent of the sex science citations in the original
1955 American Law Institute's 'Model Penal Code' cite Kinsey's
bogus data on 'normal sexuality' – alive today in courts and
Changing America's sex laws was exactly what Kinsey had
intended, as biographer Jones revealed in 1997:
"He wanted to undermine traditional morality, to soften the
rules of restraint. … Kinsey was a crypto-reformer who spent his
every waking hour attempting to change the sexual mores and sex
offender laws of the United States. …"
To sum it all up, today virtually everything having to do with
sex – from attitudes toward extramarital sex and homosexuality,
to the nation's sex-education curricula, to the ways medicine,
psychiatry, psychology, and even the criminal justice system
define and deal with sex crimes – is rooted firmly in the
ludicrously fraudulent "data" of Kinsey and his cult of
criminally deviant sex "researchers."
David Carrico featuring
Bill Schnoebelen. Proof of Freemasonry's
connection with ancient Babylonian mystery
religions and the sexual abuse of children
and others during rituals; the promotion of
human sacrifice as a pact with Satan. From a
web-review: The existence of Satanic Ritual
Abuse and Masonic Ritual Abuse are fully
supported by facts, dates and court
convictions. The video is Christian based
with selections from the Bible.
Sexual psychopath. His
'data' mostly came from sexual psychopaths, sex offenders,
criminals, pedophiles, male prostitutes, and promiscuous
homosexuals. Two of his "co-investigators" were serial
Rex King, convicted of 800 counts of child rape involving
both sexes, and
Fritz von Balluseck, an ex-Nazi convicted of the rape-murder
of a ten-year-old girl in Berlin
Kinsey solicited and encouraged pedophiles, at home and abroad,
to sexually violate from 317 to 2,035 infants and children for
his alleged data on normal "child sexuality."
Senator Nancy Schaefer and her husband Bruce have died from
a single shot wound each.
was shot once in the back while she lay sleeping. Her husband
Bruce was shot once in the chest.
Both shots were
Two shots, Two Kills
The deaths are being handled as
a 'murder-suicide'. More likely Bruce was shot
in the chest while confronting the Shooter having been woken by
the the shot that killed Nancy.
World Health Organization (WHO) gags unbiased DV studies, demands
falsified reporting on Violence Against Women
".... The Steering Committee of the WHO Study agreed that interviews
with men should not be included ..."
"In situations where very low levels of violence are documented or
there are results that are otherwise not expected, the findings should
be discussed with key informants and different community groups before
being widely disseminated."
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"
Maximum Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to conform
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal BREACH
the ideas that the State assigns
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from pre-war
Nazi Germany. Under the British system rights are
not State-given, but God Given.
Buying into the Court's position that what rights
remain are Children's Rights, is buying into the same position
that "<Natural> Parents have no rights", and Canadian Children
are at birth the property of the Courts.
If you don't want to go nuts in the Family Law Industry, you'd
better prepare yourself to recognize
undescribed psychological class of what he calls "Evil" people.
"M. Scott Peck, M.D. <Psychiatrist> wrote a most important book for
People of the Lie, The Hope For Healing Human Evil, published in
1983 by Simon & Schuster. It’s a study of human evil. Peck said he
chose the title “because lying is both a cause and a
manifestation of evil. It is partly by their lying that we recognize
Peck’s analysis of the Mylai massacre, its massive cover-up and the
deceptions made by our government in the Viet Nam war should not be
missed for its lessons for us today."
Byron says he protested his being assessed by
his Judges' wife, but
Dr. Dena Orr insisted her professionalism was sufficient to
permit her to assess Byron.
Assessment, of course
determines a patients treatment, medications, and the Conditions
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.