"Natural
Parents have NO RIGHTS.... ONLY RESPONSIBILITIES....
"Natural
Parents' Rights now gone with my Homosexual Marriage bill"
16.10 Maximum
Contact & Friendly Parent Rule has to go to conform
to Judicial Practice, or Judges may be held in criminal BREACH OF TRUST"
FYI,
the ideas that the State assigns
Rights &
Responsibilities to it's Citizen is straight from pre-war Nazi
Germany. Under the British system rights are not
State-given, but God Given.
Buying
into the Court's position that what rights remain are Children's Rights,
is buying into the same position that "<Natural> Parents have no
rights", and Canadian Children are at birth the property of the Courts.
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and they will
likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these days".
This is
completely FALSE. The Judges are Agents of the Crown
and they BY DEFINITION Judges
are WITHOUT CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
1649, only PARLIAMENT
has the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was only observed
and documented by individuals sent out by the newly Norman Crown after
the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the laws and
customs of the various peoples of Britain.. This was done with a
view to aggregate existing customs which may vary across the land,
into a unified body of Laws. The Authority quoted by the Commoners
in their administration of
Common Law were frequently direct quotations from the
Bible and principles
of
Danelaw
The process of documentation took only a couple of
hundred years, and the product was a STATIC body of Law which was
historical, popular, and has served in the intervening centuries as a
Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for "Fairness".
It does NOT change.
Instead their position to promote the "rights" of
a "Parent" in the widest sense of the word, making NO distinction
between NATURAL PARENTS and wannaabe
Legal Parents. They have bowed to
University of Victoria's
assertion that the SCC's
Trociuk Decision"endorses a
Heterosexual View of the Family and must be ignored",
legitimizing the ongoing
Child
Trafficking by the State which views
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in the
lucrative Child Adoption
Market They refuse to be hampered by prior obligations to that
pesky Natural Parent who thinks they can
Veto an Adoption.
It appears that many
"Fathers Rights" groups commonly fall in with the United Nations and
Liberal Irwin Cotler's assertion that
the
Child's Right is to be protected, but the Natural Parent has
"NO RIGHTS", making the State, not
the Natural Parents the Protector of
the Child..
Without
Cause or Consent, no Child shall be removed from a Natural Parent!!!
Svend Robinson (right) cries while being supported by his partner
Max Riveron. Robinson claimed "stress" caused him to steal
the jewelry he intended to give his boyfriend. Robinson continues
to practice law in BC following a deal cut with his
Special Prosecutor.
Svend's
Bill C250 added Homosexuals to the super class of groups in Canada's
retarded "Hate Law". who
can destroy in Criminal Court regular Canadians for exercising
Free Speech.
Even France has rejected Homo-marriage (preferring
France's homosexuals to emigrate to Canada?!). International societies
of Women Judges & Lawyers appear to have designated Canada as the
globe's Homosexual habitat of choice:
Meijers Latest news about globalizing Homo-Marriage & Homo-Parenting;
Coming up: 26-29 June 2005, Toronto, Canada, the conference of the
International Lesbian and Gay Law Association (ILGLaw),
Fabian Society, Communitarian
"Wolves in Sheep's' Clothing"
Globalizing National Socialism (Nazism) since 1884
In June 1989,
Gisele Marie Goudreault, 46 disobeyed a court order to hand her son
Orey over to his father, Rod Steinmann of Ponoka, who had been awarded
custody. She fled with the boy to Mexico and lived there for four months
before moving to California. ... Justice Peter Martin condemned
Goudreault's behaviour,
which prevented Orey and his father from being together during the
child's formative years. "They had the right to know and
love each other. "That possibility was totally and irrevocably
destroyed," Martin said. "What this woman did to this man and this
child is every parent's nightmare."2004-02-19
US teen 'discovers own kidnap', BBC
Darrel
should be able to sue Justice Southin PERSONALLY for DAMAGES, but will
that ever happen? All members of the Law Societies have sworn
their First Allegiance to their Society members.
<Horrors!>
"Provincial
Legislatures may impose a presumption of Joint
Custody... and perpetuate the domination of men over
women"
In
1991,
Anne McLellan's, then professor of law at the
University of Alberta, wrote a discussion paper for
the
Alberta Advisory Council on Women's Issues entitled,
"Women and the Process of Constitutional Reform"
In this paper, she argued that constitutional devolution
of federal government powers to the provinces would give
provincial governments
control over the
family, such that certain proceedings
in separation and
divorce would fall under provincial jurisdiction by
virtue of the province's power over property and civil
rights. Such devolution she believes would
result
in
joint custody
after divorce -
a calamity."
Justice minister Anne McLellan
wrote:
"If, through constitutional reform, divorce became a
matter of exclusive provincial jurisdiction, provinces
could then legislate comprehensively in the area of "the
family." Some provincial legislatures may choose to
impose a presumption of joint custody and require
mandatory
mediation in the resolution of family
disputes."..."an increasing number of commentators now
suggest that joint custody may simply perpetuate the
influence and domination of men over the lives of
women."
In light of
Anne McLellan's views about fathers and divorce in
her paper
"Women and the Process of Constitutional Reform"
I do not see how Canadians can trust
Anne McLellan Minister of Justice and Attorney
General of Canada to make changes to the Divorce Act as
needed and implement recommendations of the Special
Joint Committee of the Senate and the House of Commons
"For The Sake of the children". In fact she will keep
alive the popular misconception that "mother knows best
and father pays best".
Anne McLellan
and the Liberal Party of Canada claim they are
“committed to protecting Canada’s children from sexual
predators”. Their voting record and history of political
and judicial appointments suggests otherwise.
Sadly the pro-pedophile lobby, with the help of Liberal
politicians, certain judges, some media and some
academics, has succeeded in eroding our nation’s laws
protecting children. While the majority of
Canadians
want the age of
consent raised from the ridiculous low age of 14,
a small number of people are becoming confused regarding
these matters.
For those who
are confused
we want to assure you, children engaging in sexual
activity with adults is harmful and potentially deadly.
Liberal politicians, gay activist lobby groups, Liberal
judges and their friends in the media claim children
should have the “right” to engage in sodomy and sexual
intercourse with adults. This pro-pedophile
drift in our government and judiciary has more to do
with catering to the desires of homosexual activist
groups like EGALE,
pornographers like John
Robin Sharpe, and perverts like Defense Minister
Bill Graham than about caring for the well being of
children.
Here is a
summary of symptoms taken from various child abuse
websites and medical journals detailing what happens to
children when they engage in sexual activity with
adults. This evidence was presented to the Liberal
government when Canada’s age of consent law was being
debated. After reviewing the evidence, Anne McLellan
(and an overwhelming majority of Liberals) voted in
favour of legalizing sexual activity between adults and
children as young as age 14.
Symptoms of childhood sexual
abuse:
Inappropriate interest in, or knowledge of, sexual
acts
Sexually
Transmitted Diseases, HIV/AIDS
Rectal/genital injuries
Avoidance of
things related to sexuality, or rejection of own
genitals or bodies
Nightmares
and bed wetting
Drastic
changes in appetite
Over
compliance or excessive aggression
Fear of a
particular person or family member
Withdrawal,
secretiveness or depression
Suicidal
behaviour
Eating
disorders
Self-injury
Does Anne McLellan and a majority
of Liberal’s believe a perceived right to sodomy and
other forms of sexual expression is more important than
protecting children from harm? Look at the Liberal
voting and appointment record and decide for yourself.
1. In spite of credible
revelations dating back to April 2002 about Bill Graham,
a sex addicted bi-sexual, sodomizing a 15 year old male
prostitute named Lawrence Metherel, Paul Martin allowed
Graham to remain Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister - and
eventually named him to the portfolio of Minister of
Defense. Anne McLellan is aware of the “affair” and
refuses to comment on her colleague’s alleged child
abuse.
2. On Sept. 28/2005 a vote was held in
Parliament to raise the age of consent from 14 (one of
the lowest age of consents in the world) to 16 (an age
which many still consider too low). Evidence of American
sex tourists traveling to Canada to exploit 14 and 15
year olds was presented in Parliament. A story about a
14 year old mentally challenged girl in Red Deer being
victimized by a 40 year old man and her parents being
powerless to prevent the abuse was presented. Even
though the medical and psychological harm of anal and
genital intercourse was discussed, Bill Graham, Paul
Martin, and Anne McLellan, on Sept. 28th, voted against
raising the age of consent to 16.
3. Paul Martin lied about
public accountability and open and meaningful
consultation when it comes to appointments to Canada’s
Supreme Court. Instead, with no meaningful consultation,
he appointed a radical left wing and pro-homosexual
activist by the name of Rosalie Abella. Abella’s claim
to fame was acquitting a 23 year old man of sodomizing a
14 year old girl. Journalist Rory Leishman commented, in
the Oct 2004 issue of Interim Publications, on her
notorious ruling:
“Abella, with the support of two colleagues on the
Ontario Court of Appeal, let the man off on the ground
that the Criminal Code violates the alleged equality
rights of sodomites in s. 15 of the Canadian Charter of
Rights and Freedom, by stipulating age 18 as the minimum
age of consent for sodomy, but only 14 as the minimum
age of consent to all other sexual acts. “In my view,”
wrote Abella, “s. 159 (of the Criminal Code) arbitrarily
disadvantages gay men by denying to them until they are
eighteen a choice available at the age of fourteen to
those who are not gay, namely, their choice of sexual
expression with a consenting partner to whom they are
not married. Anal intercourse is a basic form of sexual
expression for gay men.”
Note that the man charged in this
case was not gay. Typically, that was of no account to
Abella. She views the Charter as a license to roam far
beyond the facts of the dispute under adjudication for
the purpose of changing the law to conform to her
personal, ideological convictions.”
This perverted ruling obviously
impressed Paul Martin. He appointed Abella to the
Supreme Court of Canada!
4. While serving as
Minister of Justice, Anne McLellan refused to
investigate a cover up of child sexual abuse
by RCMP officers at the Kingsclear
Training School for Boys. Multiple witnesses named RCMP
Staff Sgt. Clifford McCann as their abuser - but he
was never charged. Conservative MP Peter Goldring
questioned McLellan about this travesty of justice and
was bluntly told by McLellan that she intended to do
“absolutely nothing” about the RCMP cover up of child
sexual abuse at Kingsclear Training School.
We could say more but this should suffice if you care
about the well being of children. Morally we have a
responsibility to protect our children from predators,
even if the state declares 14 year olds to be fair game
for adults who want to have sex with them. We plead with
the government, police, and courts to protect our
children and vigorously prosecute pedophiles who use
children, including those who are 14 and 15 years old.
If the police, courts and government are unwilling to
protect our children we declare in no uncertain terms
that it is the responsibility of parents to protect
their children from harm, using all means necessary
including violence to ensure predators have no access to
their children. Please write a letter to the editor of
the newspaper of your choice to let both the politicians
and greater community know you will stand with the
vulnerable children, even when Anne McLellan and the
Liberal government does not.
For more information, contact Bill
Whatcott,
Executive Director of the Social Reformation:
bill_whatcott@yahoo.com
This flyer is being distributed in
memory of John McCarthy and Martin Kruze, two fourteen
year old boys who were sodomized by homosexuals at the
Toronto Maple Leaf Gardens in the late 1970s.
At age 34 Martin Kruze committed suicide. John McCarthy
turned to a life of drugs and alcohol to numb his pain.
Martin’s abuser, Gordon Stuckless was sentenced to 5
years in prison after being convicted of multiple sex
offenses. If Stuckless restricted his activities to 14
year olds we are not convinced he would spend a day
behind bars today.
“It would be better to have a millstone hanged around
one’s neck, and be thrown into the sea, than to cause
one of these little ones to stumble.” - Jesus
Christ
Yuri Bezmenov: Ideological Subversion has
Four Stages
"WWII was started by Hitler, Stalin and
American multinationals,
"Useful Idiot"
University Professors, Leftists & Homosexuals will be lined
up against a wall and shot."
Ideological Subversion's Four Stages:
Demoralization:
15-20 years to eradicate morals in youth and train them in
Marxist thinking. Positions of power in government,
civil service, business, educational system... occupied by
Leftists, Dissidents and half-baked intellectuals.
Essentially complete now in US <& Canada!!>.
Irreversible within a generation.
Destabilization of economy, foreign relations &
defense systems: 2 - 5 years.
Crisis: perhaps only 6 weeks
Normalization: Shooting the Dissidents & Useful
Idiots, taking power.
In
"Women and the Process of Constitutional Reform"
McLellan warns that
<Horrors!>
"Provincial
Legislatures may impose a presumption of Joint Custody... and
perpetuate the domination of men over women"
Domestic Violence Scam & Women's Studies'
Hate
Propaganda
".... The Steering Committee of the WHO Study agreed that interviews
with men should not be included ..."
"In situations where very low levels of violence are documented or
there are results that are otherwise not expected, the findings should
be discussed with key informants and different community groups before
being widely disseminated."
Rockefeller Foundation is a Sponsor of the World
Health Organization
Ontario Court of
Appeal from the mid 1990’s to the mid 2000’s. Records from 7 judges are compared
for over 140 family law cases. ...
It can be concluded
a man had a 96.4 % chance of losing on all issues, but a
woman had a 92.9 % chance of winning on at least some issues when appearing
before
Justice
Rosalie Abella .."
Ask a lawyer what "Common Law" is and they
will likely tell you it is
"Judge Made Law", and expand up this to say
"Common Law is whatever the Judges are commonly saying these days".
This is completely FALSE. The Judges are
Agents of the Crown and they BY DEFINITION Judges are WITHOUT
CAPACITY to make any law whatsoever. Since
1649, only PARLIAMENT has
the Capacity to make Law.
British Common law was NOT created by Judges, it was only
observed and documented by individuals sent out by the newly
Norman Crown after the
Norman Conquest of 1066 to observe and codify the laws
and customs of the various peoples of Britain.. This was done with a view to aggregate
existing customs which may vary across the land, into a unified
body of Laws.
The Authority quoted by the Commoners in their administration of
Common Law
were frequently direct quotations from the
Bible and
principles of
Danelaw
The process of documentation took
only a couple of hundred years, and the product was a STATIC
body of Law which was historical, popular, and has served in the
intervening centuries as a Benchmark against which
Statutory Law may be measured for
"Fairness".
It does NOT change.
If you don't want to go nuts in the Family Law Industry, you'd
better prepare yourself to recognize
Peck's previously
undescribed psychological class of what he calls "Evil" people.
"M. Scott Peck, M.D. <Psychiatrist> wrote a most important book for
our times,
People of the Lie, The Hope For Healing Human Evil, published in
1983 by Simon & Schuster. It’s a study of human evil. Peck said he
chose the title “because lying is both a cause and a
manifestation of evil. It is partly by their lying that we recognize
the evil.”
Peck’s analysis of the Mylai massacre, its massive cover-up and the
deceptions made by our government in the Viet Nam war should not be
missed for its lessons for us today."
Disclaimer: EqualParenting-BC.Ca encourages exercising democratic
rights such as the freedom of expression, but does not by association or
reference to other materials condone or sanction violence or hatred.
Canadian
children as State Property and merchandise for sale in the
lucrative 
